User talk:Angus77
possible conflict of interest
hello, based upon your edit history, it appears you may have a conflict of interest in editing the articles you have edited. please see WP:COI for more information. Anastrophe (talk) 22:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Anastrophe, I agree with the revert based on the content, but being a single-purpose account is not the same thing as having a conflict of interest. That said: Angus77, if you work for Secure64 --- a not-unreasonable assumption, given how much detail you have about them, can I ask you to please carefully read this page before continuing to edit anything about DNS products or Secure64? Thanks for contributing! --- tqbf 22:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- well, not to be pedantic, but that's why i used the words "may have" in my first sentence, to acknowledge that there is no certainty. Anastrophe (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- There is now! Mea culpa. Do you want to do a once-over on Secure64 Software, or do you not care? (Note: I have a relatively trivial COI here as well, but I do not work for or have equity in this company). --- tqbf 23:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- i'll check out the article when i get a chance. if it's grossly out of compliance with WP policies i may take a few stabs at it, but otherwise i have bigger fish to fry. at least, i keep telling myself that when i'm wasting hours reverting vandalism here on wp. Anastrophe (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's a bit vendor-y, but if you want to take my word for it, it's not going to get out of hand. You do have better things to do. =) --- tqbf 00:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- i'll check out the article when i get a chance. if it's grossly out of compliance with WP policies i may take a few stabs at it, but otherwise i have bigger fish to fry. at least, i keep telling myself that when i'm wasting hours reverting vandalism here on wp. Anastrophe (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- There is now! Mea culpa. Do you want to do a once-over on Secure64 Software, or do you not care? (Note: I have a relatively trivial COI here as well, but I do not work for or have equity in this company). --- tqbf 23:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- well, not to be pedantic, but that's why i used the words "may have" in my first sentence, to acknowledge that there is no certainty. Anastrophe (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Anastrophe, I agree with the revert based on the content, but being a single-purpose account is not the same thing as having a conflict of interest. That said: Angus77, if you work for Secure64 --- a not-unreasonable assumption, given how much detail you have about them, can I ask you to please carefully read this page before continuing to edit anything about DNS products or Secure64? Thanks for contributing! --- tqbf 22:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.