User talk:Bagunceiro
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Many thanks for the revert - I clicked when I shouldn't have clicked (distractions!! ...) Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC) @Denisarona: Been there, done that ;-) Bagunceiro (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC) Hello, Bagunceiro. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Henrique Bernadelli, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Henrique Bernadelli to be deleted, please add a reference to the article. If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page. Thanks, TheMagikCow (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC) November 2014Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chamber of Deputies (Brazil) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC) Re: GoianáIt doesn't make much sense to call any Brazilian city both "a town and a municipality". The way it was written, it seemed like "town" and "municipality" were two different things, or that it is possible to be a "town" or a "municipality" in Brazil. However, Brazil is officially divided in states and municipalities, so that's why I've been changing thousands of articles that were wrongly created following this formula: "Name of the city is a town and municipality in the state of...". The correct definition of any Brazilian city is "municipality". We have no "towns", the closest word for that would be "city", which is a generic and frequently informal term for any city in the world. Victão Lopes Fala! 02:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC) Reference errors on 24 AprilHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Brazilian StatesHi Bagunceiro, I updated all of the images of the states so that they looked more modern and standardised. I'll be happy to take any considerations about changing the colours if you had any. Santiago — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantiagoFrancoRamos (talk • contribs) 08:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC) Pound SterlingAlthough I appreciate your good faith on the article, the previous version was misleading, I'll mode the discussion from Twobell's talk page to the article talk page. (N0n3up (talk) 18:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)) ANI noticeThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hi, Removing prodThankfully another editor is working on the article now to source it. Hopefully you will do the same. In the future, please don't remove prods [1] unless you are also going to improve the article. :) - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Bagunceiro!Bagunceiro,
Date articlesHi. Please have a look at Boomer Vial's edit history - a concerted campaign to add as many American actors as possible to these articles as he can, regardless of notability, and he's even doing it in alphabetical order. Deb (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 20 MarchHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Hello, you are incorrect - the island of Ireland is not British and the pound sterling is not the currency in the Republic of Ireland. Regards Denisarona (talk) 04:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC) @Denisarona: The island of Ireland has nothing to do with the case, and the republic even less so. I assume you must be confusing the term British Islands with British Isles; a different thing altogether. United Kingdom is incorrect in this case since the sterling zone includes (as shown on the map) the Channel Islands and Mann; neither of which are part of the UK. I suppose it might not be a bad idea to spell it out as "the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Mann" or similar, but that is a bit wordy. Bagunceiro (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Bagunceiro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Undoing my revision on National Days?You undid my revision suggesting the Home Nations of the UK each have their own national day, why? St. Andrew's Day, St. George's Day, St. David's Day & St. Patrick's Day (with the possible addition of the anniversary of the Battle of the Boyne for certain communities in NI) are national days - in the traditional sense - of Scotland, England, Wales and (all-)Ireland respectively. I'm not precious about this edit, just curious about your revision. On what basis do you reject this notion? - R160K (talk) 23:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC) @R160K: Well, simply because, with the exception of St Andrew's day, they are not "national days". They are the feast days of the patron saints but that is not the same thing. Bagunceiro (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Bagunceiro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Bagunceiro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |