User talk:Bencemac

Welcome

Hello, Bencemac, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Bencemac, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata page deleted

Hi Bencemac, Thank you for bringing the spam/advertising issue to my attention. I am actually not trying to advertise or sell a product, I am just trying to improve the representation of female philosophers on Wikidata and Wikipedia (a similar project on female scientists was undertaken by Emily Temple-Wood and Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight for which they were both awarded Wikipedian of the Year in 2016). Can you give me some advice as to how I could describe my project on my Wikidata page so that it will not simply be deleted and dismissed as advertising? - DiotimaLives (talk) 22:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

IPBE

Hi Bencemac - if you could IPBE me on wikidata, that'd be fab. thx --Tagishsimon (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Tagishsimon: Let me know that if you do not need the right anymore. Bencemac (talk) 08:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
I will; but is there any issue with keeping it? I travel enough that it'd be a pain to keep losing an hour trying to get back into wikidata. --Tagishsimon (talk) 08:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Then global block IP exemption is what you are searching. :) Local solutions are not the best if the problem is global, in my opinion. Bencemac (talk) 08:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Bencemac. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

DJ Felix

I've declined your speedy deletion for DJ Felix, which you nominated for speedy deletion as db-madeup. Please review WP:CSD#A11: people are not eligible for speedy deletion under this criterion. Captain Calm (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear Captain Calm, it's cross-wiki spam, already removed from hiwiki. Could you please spare me some time and remove it? Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 09:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's not eligible for speedy deletion on grounds of zero notability or spam, but you can take it to WP:AFD if you think he doesn't meet notability guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Bencemac! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edit-a-thon articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
I have moved to to Draft space as Draft:Shakespeare (Pasternak poem). I'm going to check this and the others from the group , but it may take a while. DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabyl Lahlou (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nabyl Lahlou instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bencemac! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tagansky Hamlet (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Hamlet. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: User:Writer 46/sandbox

Hello Bencemac. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Writer 46/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Notabiliuty is not a speedy deletion criteria, especially in a sandbox. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:47, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm an idiot...

Facepalm Facepalm Thank you for fixing my error on Template:Infobox court. I need to be more careful. That was an insanely dumb typo in my part... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:52, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

You are not. And thanks for the correction! Bencemac (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.