Best response condition - The best response condition says: any i in the support of x must be a pure best response to the mixed strategy y if x is to be a best response against y . An equilibrium (x,y) is given if x is a best response to y and y is a best response to x.source.
Connect4 Perfect play stuff (fhourstone, Valena, Mustrum)
Kuhn’s theorem (a player who has perfect recall can always replace a mixed strategy by an equivalent behaviour strategy)
Hi! You indicated an interest in the Klee-Minty cube. A variant of this cube appears as an example on which the Criss-cross algorithm for linear optimization visits all the corners (like Dantzig's simplex algorithm does). The criss-cross article is new, and it has been nominated for Did You Know?. Your comments and suggestions and corrections would be especially valuable. Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 03:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, BlueNovember. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, BlueNovember. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XConsortium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]