User talk:Buidhe/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Buidhe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The article Anton Schmid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anton Schmid for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of K.e.coffman -- K.e.coffman (talk) 04:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@K.e.coffman: Many thanks for reviewing the article! Catrìona (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

It was a pleasure. I read about Schmid in Wette’s book, about a year or two ago, and I thought: wouldn’t it be great if Schmid’s page was better than it was back then? But I never got around to it. It was heartening to see so much improvement happed to the article. I’m also impressed with how quickly you can develop articles to high standards. Very nicely done! (Also thank you for leaving helpful messages on my Talk page in response to editors inquiring about their drafts). K.e.coffman (talk) 22:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Maurice Rossel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maurice Rossel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 00:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

The article Fredy Hirsch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fredy Hirsch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 01:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stefan Baretzki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Catrìona, once more I'm coming to you for some advice. I've been working on Draft:List of German far-right publications and publishers since 1945 but I'm not sure as to what would be the best article title for the list. List of German far-right publications and publishers since 1945 might be to vague as this could potentially also include books, which I have not covered as there would be just far to many of those to list! Any suggestions from your side? Turismond (talk) 00:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@Turismond: Great work on this list! I think the word you are looking for is "periodicals". It also seems like two separate lists: List of German far-right periodicals (post-1945) and List of German far-right publishers (post-1945). List of German far-right books (post-1945) might also be a valid list, depending on the inclusion criteria. Catrìona (talk) 03:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Catrìona. Splitting it makes sense, good idea. Turismond (talk) 06:09, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for recently reviewing the article I'm trying to submit for consideration: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Bawiec During your review, you rejected the article on the basis that the subject doesn't show significant coverage in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject as referenced in guidelines on the notability of music-related topics. However, this subject isn't a performer but a composer. So, rather than falling under the Criteria for musicians and ensembles it should be evaluated under the Criteria for composers and lyricists. Under these criteria, the subject meets the majority of the criterions, particularly #2 as having written multiple musicals, and #4 having been nominated and awarded numerous awards for various works. I have updated the article draft to include his more recent musical theatre works and relevant citations. Would you be kind enough to re-evaluate the article under the new criteria? Thank you. --Bluestar2003 (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@Bluestar2003: It looks like he might be notable under the criteria you mentioned, but you'll need to cite a reliable independent source for the assertion of notability (French Wikipedia cannot be used as a source). Coincidentally, do you have a conflict of interest with Bawiec? Catrìona (talk) 00:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

• KevinBahr8 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jordan Yale Levine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I was going to go back and edit my draft here for an article on Jordan Yale Levine, since there are a few other sources I wanted to add. But before I went to the trouble of editing it, I wanted to know if these sources would be enough to qualify it for a page: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/yale-productions-partners-afm-fate-james-francos-pretenders-1156453 https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/afm-2017-producer-jordan-yale-levine-avoid-hotels-mosh-pit-lobby-1053631 http://heedmag.com/2015/05/13/film-producer-jordan-yale-levine-talks-humble-beginnings-success-jay-z-more/ https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-best-friend-to-have-in-hollywood-president-of_us_57fb51fce4b0d786aa52b7e6

If I add in these sources and work them into the article, would this be enough to qualify it for a page?

KevinBahr8 (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@KevinBahr8: Thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately, I don't think that these sources establish Levine's notability. Interviews are not an independent source, and a HuffPost contributor probably cannot be used to establish notability (since Forbes contributors can't, either). Catrìona (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)