Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:08, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I want to know whom to write for copyright permission for a picture published on your site wikipedia? ~2026-40952-76 (talk) 11:46, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Can you tell me which picture? Chaud321 (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I see your paid editing declaration, so I have made this only a username block. However, I would note that your use of the terms "personal pages" and "company pages" is incorrect; Wikipedia has articles about companies and people, they do not belong to the subjects, who have no more rights to them than any other editor. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

You will need to not edit articles directly. If memory serves, you need to list all those who have paid you to edit. You will need to suggest edits. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.-- Dlohcierekim 14:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Chaud321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

chaud321 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Thanks for the advice! I was unaware of that policy about appearing to represent a group or organization or website. Here is a new username to switch out. Can we associate it with my past contributions? Thanks! (Note: See my paid disclosure and conflict of interest statements.) 76.27.177.119 (talk) 13:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Accept. Unblocked. Welcome back, Yes -- Dlohcierekim 14:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

globally renamed HTM Editor to Chaud321-- Dlohcierekim 14:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Dlohcierekim: Thanks very much! Chaud321 (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

As the review editor for this last series of requests, I'd like to offer my input to your request for editor assistance. In your recent request you had asked for news items concerning the company's funding rounds to be added in detail to the article. While the broad strokes have been included, other details were not. The sources offered have been news coverage of the company. While news coverage can be a useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy details do not qualify for inclusion. Routine news reporting of announcement details on funding rounds may seem important to the company, but for others they may be seen as insufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

In this case, Booster views each successful funding round as validation of the company and its officers – a validation which represents the startup's quest to bring a viable, successful product to their respective marketplace. Booster views these as representational of its core value and thus should be mentioned in their article. However, Wikipedia is not the place to promote a company's validation.

It's important to remember that even when a company is notable, not all events they are involved in are. News reporting about a company's achieved funding rounds can be flattering and provide needed validation, but using all of these sources with every fleshed-out nuance would lead to over-detailed articles that look like a diary. Not every source of income is significant enough to be included in a company's article.

In the case of Booster, the main funding achivements have been graphed in the article, while the SEC report used as the source is linked in the reference for the reader to investigate further where each amount came from. Being only 4 years-old, it's important for the company to remember that as they grow, more information will inevitably make it to the article. I look forward to your continued helpful suggestions, and I appreciate all of your assistance in helping to improve this important article. Regards,  Spintendo  11:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Lucid, from its old location at User:Chaud321/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sagotreespirit were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Avoid using PR language (especially in the Awards and Recognition section): WP:IBA. Avoid using direct quotes due to the risk of running into copyright violations. Company may be too new to meet notability requirements: WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucid (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucid (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 16:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lucid (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

AiFi (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE and WP:BIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caroline Winnett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Caroline Winnett, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Clarityfiend: Thank you for the guidance and review! I have beefed up the article Draft:Caroline_Winnett and resubmitted with two new sections and more citations/references to the subject from local and international sources. Her role as the director of a global accelerator is similar to Sam Altman head of Y Combinator.

Chaud321 (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Caroline Winnett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 00:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Cairo2k18: I'm honored! Thank you.

Steve Gu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Destroyer🌀🌀 14:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Destroyeraa: Thank you so much!

No problem. The draft was very well-written! ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 14:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status. As per WP:Paid, please provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Thank you, GSS ^💬 17:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

GSS Yes! Please note that on my user page User:Chaud321 I list my employer as https://hottomato.net/, whose clients I assist. I do not advertise anywhere however, and my employer also does not advertise my Wikipedia services anywhere, as Wikipedia is not a primary business offering, so I have nothing additional to disclose at this time. Thanks for checking though!

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sadads (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Sadads: Thank you so much!

Chaud321 (talk) 14:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles: Han Jin (businessman) Booster_Fuels AiFi Draft:Ying_Zheng_(computer_scientist) Steve_Gu Berkeley SkyDeck Caroline_Winnett Solar_Impulse_Foundation Bertrand_Piccard

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The submission as well as added sources are talking about Junzi Capital Engineering, and Berkeley SkyDeck. I found no independent coverage about the subject. It can be redirected to Berkeley SkyDeck.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chon Tang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chon Tang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@TheBirdsShedTears: Thanks for the detailed feedback! Good to know exactly what is needed to resubmit.

Chaud321 (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ying Zheng (computer scientist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chon Tang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ying Zheng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article AiFi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article, does not meet WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chon Tang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Chaud321, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages in your personal sandbox, such as User:Chaud321/sandbox, are not allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:USERNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is not an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories twice in the past week, do not readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption if it doesn't stop, such as page protection or deletion and/or the temporary or permanent suspension of your editing privileges. Bearcat (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Bearcat, wow...I had no idea that was the case! My apologies. I am doing everything I can to follow the rules, and happy to receive guidance. I thought that Sandboxes and Drafts were restricted spaces and not connected to the mainspace. Thank you for the links and instructions! Chaud321 (talk) 14:17, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I re-added the categories to my other pending draft Draft:Solace_Health with colons ahead of each category as you recommended. Will continue this practice going forward. Chaud321 (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, MSK, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Yoshi Mobility to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

msk 03:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi MSK! It is nice to meet you. Please allow me to provide irrefutable proof that Draft:Yoshi_Mobility is original work. Between June 15 (see history) and June 30 (see history) I saved 349 incremental revisions to Draft:Yoshi_Mobility in my sandbox. As a matter of principle, I do not use LLMs to compose my drafts. I can say truthfully that I did not use LLMs to complete Draft:Yoshi_Mobility. I welcome your scrutiny of my Sandbox history that records the timestamped, step-by-step, research and citation-focused, entirely human process by which I pieced together this draft article over a period of 15 days. I look forward to hearing what my next steps should be.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Chaud321 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Hot Tomato Marketing on behalf of Yoshi Mobility.

Chaud321 (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi MSK, thank you for the incorrect decline! Separately, can you help me get Draft:Yoshi_Mobility back into the AfC submissions waiting for review? Unfortunately, Draft:Yoshi_Mobility is showing up as a declined AfC submission, even though the incorrect decline has now been removed. Thank you so much for your help! Chaud321 (talk) 16:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

MSK, ignore my previous request; Draft:Yoshi_Mobility the has been put back in the waiting queue! All set. Chaud321 (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Dafootballguy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Yoshi Mobility to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 03:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dafootballguy! It's nice to meet you. You posted that the draft does "not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people."

I think this may be a mistake because Yoshi Mobility is not a person; Yoshi Mobility is a company.

I'd be happy to review Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). The article contains seven sources that fit all four criteria for organizational notability (significant, independent, reliable, secondary). The seven sources are:

• Bloomberg
• Business Insider
• The Washington Post
• Forbes
• Entrepreneur
• VentureBeat
• CNBC

I believe that Draft:Yoshi_Mobility strongly passes the notability criteria for organizations and companies. Happy to discuss it more!

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Chaud321 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Hot Tomato Marketing on behalf of Yoshi Mobility.

Chaud321 (talk) 13:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dafootballguy, I went to a Wikipedia live help session and received some good instruction on the article's notability, in particularly the quality of the sources (or lack thereof). Draft:Yoshi_Mobility has received significant text cuts; reduction in primary sources, articles lacking provenance (as in a named author), and trade press; and the addition of The Guardian as another reputable source. The article also includes Business Insider, Entrepreneur, The Washington Post, Bloomberg, VentureBeat, and CNBC, with emphasis on the best coverage. (Forbes citations have been removed due to the authors being contributors.) New TechCrunch references were authored by staff writers. It is my belief that the draft now better aligns with Wikipedia's standards of notability. Thank you for your input!

Chaud321 (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Accesscrawl, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

The draft has improved, but the sources still don't pass WP:NCORP. most of the coverage is routine reporting about funding, partnerships and product launches. Significant independent coverage about the company itself would help.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Yoshi Mobility to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Accesscrawl (talk) 03:59, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Accesscrawl, thank you for the encouragement that the draft is improving!

Per your recommendations, the Draft:Yoshi_Mobility length has been significantly reduced to focus on the most significant independent coverage:

• Sources Business Insider, Entrepreneur, and The Washington Post provide independent, extensive coverage of the company as the main story subject.
• The new fire marshal paragraph citing Bloomberg and The Guardian adheres to the [notability principle] that "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material."
• Sources TechCrunch and the Nashville Business Journal provide factual context.
• Only two primary sources are included.

Chaud321 (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yoshi Mobility, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Absurdum4242, incredibly delighted to see this today. Thank you for your positive review and approval!

Chaud321 (talk) 16:46, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Chaud321You did a great job bringing it up the the standard required 👍 Absurdum4242 (talk) 00:28, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!

Chaud321 (talk) 13:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, CherryPie94, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Potentially notable, but all the sources here are about fundraising and that's WP:CORPROUTINE.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Solace Health to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 03:59, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply