User talk:CosmLearner

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CosmLearner. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CosmLearner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

I and TheNeutrality have been suspected of being sockpuppets. In the 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence article, TheNeutrality has almost always supported my edits. Similarly, in the 2024 Chittagong unrest article, when another editor reverted my edits, TheNeutrality reverted that editor's changes and rewrote the section in a manner quite similar to mine. This does not mean that TheNeutrality is my, CosmLearner's, sockpuppet. At the article 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence edits of a similar nature were made by editors like Za-ari-masen, AAShemul, Ahammed Saad and Bruno pnm ars and at article 2024 Chittagong unrest the editors Ahammed Saad and LucrativeOffer also manifested in similar ways. This does not necessarily mean that they are sockpuppets of one another. Both articles deal with topics of interest to users in Bangladesh and parts of India. The TheNeutrality account was created; it made an enormous number of edits only on the 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence article initially, and then also on the article, 2024 Chittagong unrest. If you examine TheNeutrality's contribution page, it becomes clear that they supported my edits. But how does this prove sockpuppetry. Perhaps TheNeutrality liked the topics of these two articles and found my edits useful, which is why they supported my contributions to these articles. Since TheNeutrality is not a real name, I cannot recognize them. Some of my friends that live in the neighboring flats may edit Wikipedia. Each one is connected through their independent internet service providers. My residence has an internet connection only to the devices that I use. I adhere to Wikipedia guidelines and am fully aware of the rules about sockpuppetry. I categorically deny the suspicion of being a sockpuppet operator. I request that my account be unblocked and that the changes made to my user page and other areas be reverted to their original state. If you are certain that I am involved in sockpuppetry, I will not make any further requests for unblocking. C⚛smLearner 💬🔬 07:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

There are some occurrences here that are incredibly unlikely to coincidental. This combined with the evidence displayed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CosmLearner makes it improbable to me that you are two different users. I've also blocked a new sock, Mysterious Particle (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI). DatGuyTalkContribs 11:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.