User talk:Danners430

This is Danners430's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 10 days

This user's mind-reading skills are not so good. Please leave an edit summary. What did you do? This user includes edit summaries in their contributions and thinks that everybody should use them as well.

This user has publicly declared that he has a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Strathspey Railway (preserved). This user has publicly declared that he has a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles: North Yorkshire Moors Railway List of rolling stock preserved on the North Yorkshire Moors Railway

Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him!

Hi Danners,

Good morning, I noticed that you reversed most of the deletion of my edits by a certain IP user, I would like to say thanks!

The reason he left me was a little bit confusing, as he mentioned the “consensus” and being not very friendly threatening me for banning my account from editing.

What do you think? Yuezhi Huang (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore it. Users making threats like that will only serve them poorly. It is on the user who claims there is consensus to provide evidence of said consensus - all they have to do is link the discussion that took place, and both of us would stop (although I'd be in support of opening a new discussion if such consensus did exist). As of right now, they're simply mass reverting perfectly good edits with no good reason as far as anyone can see. Danners430 (talk) 12:28, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, glad to have someone on this side cause what he has done was very confusing. Do I have somebody to talk to in case the worst thing happens? Like an administrator or a coordinatior? Yuezhi Huang (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They physically can't block you, don't worry - only administrators can. If things get out of hand, take a look at the guidelines at WP:DR - and in the worst case, WP:ANI. Danners430 (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! I’m new to the community and glad to hear something from an experienced contributor! Have a good one! Yuezhi Huang (talk) 12:42, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, as stated we do not add aircraft images in infoboxes. This has been practiced here for the last 10 plus years. Feel free to talk about it at the Aviation portal if you want to question that practice. There is a reason why out of several thousand airline articles only a hand full (without any exaggeration) will have a picture there - the reason being we don’t do it. For the sake of consistency you cannot start doing so (albeit with mostly very low quality images) on a hand full of articles. Blaming someone for vandalism without being familiar with the editing standards of certain subtopics and therefore damaging well maintained articles is neither fair nor acceptable - especially if the new user that started doing so himself edited several articles without providing mandatory sources or citations which clearly can be considered vandalism. Best regards. 2A02:3033:26B:D6B6:C01A:9A6B:C082:EFF8 (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are the only one claiming there is consensus - therefor it’s up to you to provide the link to that consensus - as of right now, I cannot find it. Stop edit warring and provide the consensus - and if it doesn’t exist, then start a discussion in the relevant project talk page to get a consensus. Danners430 (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing saying images besides the logo are not permitted in airline articles. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Archive 22#Aircraft images in airline infoboxes CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]