User talk:ErrorModelling

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perception Error Model (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Shocksingularity were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Parenthetical citation is deprecated on Wikipedia. See WP:PAREN
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Shocksingularity (talk) 06:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi,
Thanks for your review on my submission.
Regarding parenthetical citations: The article uses inline citations with <ref> tags, not parenthetical citations. According to WP:PAREN, "This does not affect short citations that use <ref> tags, which are not inline parenthetical references." The guideline prohibits citations in the format (Smith 2010, p. 1) placed directly in article text, which this article does not use.
I was unclear about your concerns - were there any particular parts of the article you found to be problematic?
Kind Regards, ErrorModelling (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
In this case, I mean stuff like "Innes and Ramamoorthy (2023)". On Wikipedia, rather than citing like this, you would say it in prose, ie "in a 2023 article by Craig Innes and Subramanian Ramamoorthy..."
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any more concerns or questions. Shocksingularity (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I removed the citations you mentioned. I agree - the article flows much better as prose.
Was there anything else you thought could be improved in order to get the article approved?
Kind Regards, ErrorModelling (talk) 16:46, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, ErrorModelling! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shocksingularity (talk) 06:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perception Error Model has been accepted

Perception Error Model, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Shocksingularity (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.