User talk:Fastily/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fastily. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This file had a consensus of 4:2 to keep it. So why was it deleted? X.One ^SOS 06:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-31T06:26:00.000Z","author":"Secret of success","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T06:26:00.000Z-Don_2_poster","replies":["c-Fastily-2011-12-31T08:15:00.000Z-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T06:26:00.000Z"],"displayName":"X.One"}}-->

I don't count !votes, I weigh the strength of arguments against one another. As far as I could tell, the keep !votes failed to address the concerns raised by the delete !votes and the nominator. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-31T08:15:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2011-12-31T08:15:00.000Z-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T06:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T14:36:00.000Z-Fastily-2011-12-31T08:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm sorry, but one user had asked us to cover the notability of the poster from a reliable source and I gave one listing out all the 3d posters of the film! What other argument was there? Could you please restore it so that I could take a better look? Thanks. X.One ^SOS 14:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-31T14:36:00.000Z","author":"Secret of success","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T14:36:00.000Z-Fastily-2011-12-31T08:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T07:08:00.000Z-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T14:36:00.000Z"],"displayName":"X.One"}}-->

Specifically, the keep !votes based arguments solely on WP:ILIKEIT, instead of addressing/refuting the concerns made by the nominator, which was that the file failed to meet WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. You're welcome to try and convince me otherwise, but I will reconsider only if you are able to explain how the arguments to keep the file made in the debate refute the nominator's concerns. And no, I cannot return this file for you to view. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T07:08:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T07:08:00.000Z-Secret_of_success-2011-12-31T14:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-Secret_of_success-2012-01-01T08:48:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T07:08:00.000Z"]}}-->

I apologize if I seemed too impatient. Coming to the debate, the criterion "NFCC#3a" says that multiple images should not convey equivalent significant information. As this is a 3d poster, it can be significantly distinguished from the 2d poster. As usually happening in western countries, in India this film has not been shot directly in 3d, but actually converted using a special technology. A poster, by definition is a screenshot of a film modified to add text and other visual effects to promote it. Due to its indirect conversion, which is one of the first in India, the poster conveys the above statement, without neglecting the fact that this is not the usual style seen in 3d films. The 3d resolution requires special lenses to view it, but one can easily make out the difference even without a 3d glass. Per "NFCC#8", its omission would indeed be detrimental to the understanding, as the world is not very familiar with what exactly 3d conversion leads to, and this is the result of it. Hope I made it clear. Again, I apologize for impatience. And a happy 2012 to you! Thanks. X.One ^SOS 08:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T08:48:00.000Z","author":"Secret of success","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Secret_of_success-2012-01-01T08:48:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T07:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T16:31:00.000Z-Secret_of_success-2012-01-01T08:48:00.000Z"],"displayName":"X.One"}}-->

The poster does not show the process of making it 3D, it does not make any particular effort to illustrate the difference between 2D and 3D, it's not in 3D itself, it's just a screenshot of the film with the word 3D on it. If it is true that this is one of the first films to be shot in 3D, and this fact is covered in reliable, third party sources, it still would not justify the use of the second movie poster. It might justify a screenshot of the movie in theaters, showing what the projection looks like without 3D glasses, as that would illustrate the concept in a way that the movie poster did not do. I'm not saying that this isn't important, I'm saying that there are other, better ways to illustrate this, and that we have to be extra careful in selecting non-free media. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T16:31:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T16:31:00.000Z-Secret_of_success-2012-01-01T08:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Secret_of_success-2012-01-02T08:36:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T16:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

The poster is clearly in 3d itself, look at it clearly. The source says that it is in 3D, you can differentiate it from the 2d poster. It illustrates the projection without glasses. Period. What is the doubt here? X.One ^SOS 08:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T08:36:00.000Z","author":"Secret of success","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Secret_of_success-2012-01-02T08:36:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T16:31:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"X.One"}}-->

Hello, Fastily! I'm afraid that I have to report User:Ryulong to you.I don't know why, but he is removing images from articles like Tom and Jerry, Pantaloon Retail India, Rural area.Examples include this, or this.I'm not all all interested in edit-wars, so any advice.I would probably be getting out of the argument going on at Pantaloon Retail India.Bye.Dipankan ^{In the woods?} 12:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T12:28:00.000Z","author":"Dipankan001","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dipankan001-2012-01-01T12:28:00.000Z-User:Ryulong","replies":["c-Ryulong-2012-01-01T21:24:00.000Z-Dipankan001-2012-01-01T12:28:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Dipankan"}}-->

The photo on Tom and Jerry is a derivative work and is going to be deleted from the commons. I may be mistaken, but I do not think the photo of that store front is allowed on the Commons either, but I will let that discussion follow through. And finally, that photo of a "Rural area" is a poor quality photo. The other photos on rural area are fine. It does not need a blurry photo of a grassy field in India.—Ryulong (竜龙) 21:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:24:00.000Z","author":"Ryulong","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ryulong-2012-01-01T21:24:00.000Z-Dipankan001-2012-01-01T12:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Hurricanefan25-2012-01-01T22:36:00.000Z-Ryulong-2012-01-01T21:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

Dipankan, I think that you may be seeking adminship; the first thing you should understand is copyright, as your file mover permission was removed for a lack of understanding of the subject. HurricaneFan25 — 22:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T22:36:00.000Z","author":"Hurricanefan25","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Hurricanefan25-2012-01-01T22:36:00.000Z-Ryulong-2012-01-01T21:24:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"HurricaneFan"}}-->

Dear sir,

I am working for this NGO "Parivartann- Change for better". I just wanted to put one page on wiki just for information. Anybody who know this organization can edit them. Please allow me to create one simple page.

You have deleted that page under G8. As I am a new guy in wiki, I am clueless even after going through the details. Please help me to rectify my errors.

Thank you, Gurupad Hegde, Hyderabad, INDIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gshguru (talk • contribs) 14:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T14:51:00.000Z","author":"Gshguru","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gshguru-2012-01-01T14:51:00.000Z-Parivartann","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:52:00.000Z-Gshguru-2012-01-01T14:51:00.000Z"]}}-->

The article was moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parivartann. The admin you're looking for is User:Qwyrxian -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 20:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T20:52:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:52:00.000Z-Gshguru-2012-01-01T14:51:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,

You deleted American International School of Vienna, due to: (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://newkai.com/reviews/ais/)

I am the owner and author of the said text on newkai.com and the author of the original text on Wikipedia. Does this still make it copyright infringement? Can I infringe on my own copyright? What do I need to do to get this article restored? -newkai t-c 15:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T15:35:00.000Z","author":"Newkai","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Newkai-2012-01-01T15:35:00.000Z-Speedy_Deletion_of_American_International_School_of_Vienna","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:52:00.000Z-Newkai-2012-01-01T15:35:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G12 -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 20:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T20:52:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:52:00.000Z-Newkai-2012-01-01T15:35:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The alleged "copyrighted material" at http://www.wellsclan.us/History/generatn/21regmnt.htm was not material created by that website, but was an extract from Dyer, Frederick H. A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion (Des Moines, IA: Dyer Pub. Co.), 1908. "Dyer's" is a text in the public domain, and is commonly used as a (or the) source document for most of the Wikipedia entries for Union regiments from the American Civil War. My article in Wikipedia used an extract from "Dyer's" (and stated as much), as did the author of the page at the wellsclan.us website (working separately). The wellsclan.us website in question states that the information on that page is an extract from "Dyer's", as was the deleted page on the 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry. There were NO plagiarism, and NO copyright infringement. The two documents were created separately extracting the same document which is now in the public domain. Please reinstate the deleted Wiki page for the 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry.

I stand ready to provide any addition information you might require.--WSS Regt Historian (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T19:07:00.000Z","author":"WSS Regt Historian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-WSS_Regt_Historian-2012-01-01T19:07:00.000Z-Speedy_Deletion_of_21st_Missouri_Volunteer_Infantry","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:53:00.000Z-WSS_Regt_Historian-2012-01-01T19:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Very well then, go ahead and recreate the article. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 20:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T20:53:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:53:00.000Z-WSS_Regt_Historian-2012-01-01T19:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Following up to your last statement "Very well then, go ahead and recreate the article"...Does this mean that my work was irrecoverably destroyed without discussion? And, what is to prevent the individual who initiated this process from having the restored articles, or other articles which use "Dyers" from being similary destroyed? The process is not transpartent on this end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.7.60 (talk) 21:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:14:00.000Z","author":"76.205.7.60","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-76.205.7.60-2012-01-01T21:14:00.000Z-Speedy_Deletion_of_21st_Missouri_Volunteer_Infantry","replies":["c-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:35:00.000Z-76.205.7.60-2012-01-01T21:14:00.000Z","c-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:41:00.000Z-76.205.7.60-2012-01-01T21:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Fastily: Are you standing by your WP:CSD#G12 deletion? If you are disputing User:WSS Regt Historian's claim, please say so. If not, please restore the article. Thincat (talk) 21:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:35:00.000Z","author":"Thincat","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:35:00.000Z-76.205.7.60-2012-01-01T21:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you. I hope the categorisation as unambiguous copyright infringement was a momentary aberration. Thincat (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:41:00.000Z","author":"Thincat","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:41:00.000Z-76.205.7.60-2012-01-01T21:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I've restored this, as its deletion isn't non-controversial. The redirect is in active use; I discovered it had been deleted when I tried to tag an image with Twinkle, and found it dead. It is still linked from WP:CSD. I myself believe it is probably a useful redirect, as an easy shortcut to remember, and would prefer to see it go through deletion debate if you think it needs to go away. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T20:29:00.000Z","author":"Moonriddengirl","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-01T20:29:00.000Z-Template:Db-unfree","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:55:00.000Z-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-01T20:29:00.000Z"]}}-->

The problem with using {{Db-unfree}} in twinkle is that it doesn't fill in the date parameters required by {{Di-orphaned fair use}} (the redirect target of Template:Db-unfree). I'll file a bug report to get this fixed. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 20:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T20:55:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:55:00.000Z-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-01T20:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-01T21:02:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks. I hate to lose easy-to-remember redirects, but if for some reason it can't be fixed, maybe Twinkle can be reconfigured and the pages that suggest the template be changed to the template to work. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:02:00.000Z","author":"Moonriddengirl","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-01T21:02:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T20:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

It looks to me that the Melatonin article is using the pronunciation sound file you have nominated at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_29#File:Melatonin-pronunciation.ogg for being orphaned and of no forseeable use. Am I missing something? Are you missing something? It was not orphaned when a bot tagged it as being so. I cannot find the file on Commons. I do not understand the corresponding Fbot activity[1]. This also applies at least to the next few nominations you have made. I do not have the ability to do mass checking. Can you double-check and let be know what is going wrong? Thincat (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:27:00.000Z","author":"Thincat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:27:00.000Z-File:Melatonin-pronunciation.ogg,_etc,_etc","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T21:45:00.000Z-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

As a matter of fact, I was. Thanks for letting me know. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 21:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:45:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T21:45:00.000Z-Thincat-2012-01-01T21:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Fastily, please undo your deletion of CtC. It's a shorthand that I use personally (which is why I created it), and which I use as a personal shortlist (since no one else uses CtC, the 'what links here' function takes me to a list of files I personally vetted for transfer). Obviously with the drive starting now the timing on this couldn't be worse. I realize that this is a strange request, but I don't see the harm in it. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:46:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:46:00.000Z-Please_undo_your_deletion_of_Template:CtC","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T21:47:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

You mean, you actually use that?? Freak. ;) -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 21:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:47:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T21:47:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T21:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

Apparently you got rid of more than just my shorthand, I see FSII knocked out a few others as well. Just so you know, I am rather miffed that you didn't even leave me a deletion notice. Aside from the fact that you really can't do what you just did, I'd have defended it at the deletion forum, and had it looked like it was going sour, I'd have copied over the list to a sandbox page before you had FSII scatter things to the far winds. Grrrr... Sven Manguard Wha? 21:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T21:52:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T21:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-01T22:09:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

>.< It was meant to assist Fbot Task 14, but I'll see if I can create an exemption for CtC. Again, I had no idea that you were using that to track your contributions... -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 22:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T22:09:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-01T22:09:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-01T21:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-02T01:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T22:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

It's okay, you don't need to make an exception. There might be a problem, however, when all of the other people who use the shorthand templates go to use them and find they don't work. My suggestion is that you re-create the shorthand templates, and program a bot that catches instances of the shorthands being added and converts them to the proper template. A BRFA should be pretty easy for that, I think. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T01:18:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-02T01:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-01T22:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

There's a discussion on my talk page I'm sure you will be interested in - involving Category:Non-free images with orphaned versions more than 7 days old. --SPhilbrick(Talk) 22:28, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T22:28:00.000Z","author":"Sphilbrick","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sphilbrick-2012-01-01T22:28:00.000Z-Category:Non-free_images_with_orphaned_versions_more_than_7_days_old.","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for that. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 23:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-01T23:37:00.000Z","author":"Catfish Jim","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Catfish_Jim-2012-01-01T23:37:00.000Z-Nice_catch","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T03:47:00.000Z-Catfish_Jim-2012-01-01T23:37:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Catfish"}}-->

Sure thing. Best, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 03:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T03:47:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T03:47:00.000Z-Catfish_Jim-2012-01-01T23:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Why you deleted the article & He is really famous Russian journalist and he was brave during latest protests - he refused to speak on air if media will keep silence!--94.228.193.11 (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T04:31:00.000Z","author":"94.228.193.11","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-94.228.193.11-2012-01-02T04:31:00.000Z-Alexey_Pivovarov","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T05:33:00.000Z-94.228.193.11-2012-01-02T04:31:00.000Z","c-94.228.193.11-2012-01-03T02:30:00.000Z-94.228.193.11-2012-01-02T04:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#PROD -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T05:33:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T05:33:00.000Z-94.228.193.11-2012-01-02T04:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• Thank you for useless link, but I want to see your answer here. Or deletion was just your vandalism?--94.228.193.11 (talk) 02:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T02:30:00.000Z","author":"94.228.193.11","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-94.228.193.11-2012-01-03T02:30:00.000Z-94.228.193.11-2012-01-02T04:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Fastily, look at this article [[2]]. It's an autobiography of another Wikipedian user. Please delete it. Abhijay ^☎(Тalk)/_{✍ (My Deeds)} 05:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T05:45:00.000Z","author":"Abhijay","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Abhijay-2012-01-02T05:45:00.000Z-Query","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T05:47:00.000Z-Abhijay-2012-01-02T05:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T05:47:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T05:47:00.000Z-Abhijay-2012-01-02T05:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-Abhijay-2012-01-02T07:13:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T05:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

Fastily, I have a concern to raise about. Apparently in December 2011, User:PurpleHeartEditor was blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of User:Asgardian, whereas he claims that he isn't and has actually said so that he isn't. May I request he be unblocked, or should he continue to be blocked? Abhijay ^☎(Тalk)/_{✍ (My Deeds)} 07:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T07:13:00.000Z","author":"Abhijay","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Abhijay-2012-01-02T07:13:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T05:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:27:00.000Z-Abhijay-2012-01-02T07:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

Checkuser evidence (accessible to admins with the checkuser right) suggests otherwise. If User:PurpleHeartEditor/User:Asgardian wants to be unblocked, he will have to appeal directly to the arbitration committee. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 19:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T19:27:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:27:00.000Z-Abhijay-2012-01-02T07:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, A few days ago I informed you about user 46.196.33.96/ 88.247.101.165 that he is simply destroys the article Ben Gurion Airport. You warned him and he does'nt listen. I'd love if you help me again.--Friends147 (talk) 10:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T10:33:00.000Z","author":"Friends147","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Friends147-2012-01-02T10:33:00.000Z-Problems_with_user_46.196.33.96_and_88.247.101.165_AGAIN!!!!!!!","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z-Friends147-2012-01-02T10:33:00.000Z"]}}-->

All the IP did this time was add a link to qantas.com. If you don't mind my asking, what's wrong with it? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 19:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z-Friends147-2012-01-02T10:33:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

What are talking about? Which qantas? i mean to the article Ben Gurion Airport (in Tel Aviv)! he delete everytime things from the article without proof (i have) and if i'm show him my right proof he just ignore.I'm really don't understand why did you get me wrong.--Friends147 (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T00:03:00.000Z","author":"Friends147","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Friends147-2012-01-03T00:03:00.000Z-Problems_with_user_46.196.33.96_and_88.247.101.165_AGAIN!!!!!!!","replies":[]}}-->

Please consider taking this issue to the Administrator's noticeboard. I think they may be able to help you with such an issue of long standing abuse.

If you are in fact carefully reviewing the files that you nominate, why did you nominate a national anthem, a recording of a Walt Whitman poem, and recordings of multiple Wikipedia articles for deletion? Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T14:56:00.000Z","author":"Calliopejen1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Calliopejen1-2012-01-02T14:56:00.000Z-Sound_file_nominations","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z-Calliopejen1-2012-01-02T14:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

I am personally of the belief that these files should be deleted, so I nominated them for deletion to see if others agreed with me. In case you haven't noticed, I am perfectly open to opposing opinions; if someone finds a file to be useful, I'll be happy to default to keep/move to commons. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 19:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z-Calliopejen1-2012-01-02T14:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-Calliopejen1-2012-01-03T01:56:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z","c-Bulwersator-2012-01-02T19:47:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z"]}}-->

So in your view, the national anthem of Malaysia as performed by the US Navy band should have been deleted? Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T01:56:00.000Z","author":"Calliopejen1","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Calliopejen1-2012-01-03T01:56:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Really, error rate is very high ( Apollo12 - Strollingonthemoononeday.ogg or K-V Street Video1.ogg ). Quality of typical sound/video hosted on wikipedia is low but it is not valid reason to nominate everything Bulwersator (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T19:47:00.000Z","author":"Bulwersator","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Bulwersator-2012-01-02T19:47:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:49:00.000Z-Bulwersator-2012-01-02T19:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

Those are both...files on Commons. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 19:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T19:49:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:49:00.000Z-Bulwersator-2012-01-02T19:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Calliopejen1-2012-01-03T01:55:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:49:00.000Z"]}}-->

Um, they are on commons because you moved them there after you nominated them for deletion, and then others pointed out that your nominations were bad. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T01:55:00.000Z","author":"Calliopejen1","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Calliopejen1-2012-01-03T01:55:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-02T19:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:12:00.000Z-Calliopejen1-2012-01-03T01:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Wrong. I stand by what I nominated. If I thought otherwise, I would have withdrawn the noms a long time ago. Since you obviously ignored what I had to say, I will repeat myself one more time: I have listened to all these files and am of the opinion that they are not useful to the project, so I have nominated them for community review. As always, you are welcome to disagree and voice your opinion at FFD. However, please refrain from making this a personal matter. I do not appreciate your rude, condescending messages and the disruptive banners you placed on FfD pages. I have always found you to be reasonable and well-mannered, but your recent behavior is rather unbecoming of an administrator. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T07:12:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:12:00.000Z-Calliopejen1-2012-01-03T01:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This seems good to me (although my other two suggestions still stand). I was already using this system in fact, because Twinkle's batch unprotect feature is nifty, so I already have my unprotections spread over four pages. So yeah, sounds good to me, maybe get more than one admin to "subscribe" to these? - Jarry1250 ^{[Deliberation needed]} 22:17, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T22:17:00.000Z","author":"Jarry1250","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jarry1250-2012-01-02T22:17:00.000Z-Unprotection","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:13:00.000Z-Jarry1250-2012-01-02T22:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

I was planning on having the bot notify the unprotecting admin via talk page message. I suppose we could set up a page for admins to watch, but IMO, that seems a bit unnecessarily complicated. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:13, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T07:13:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:13:00.000Z-Jarry1250-2012-01-02T22:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I noticed you deleted a category similar to this and I would like to request restoring that please. Although this category is empty at the moment it is used as a administrative category and may or may not have items in it at any given time as they are identified or found. Thanks. --Kumioko (talk) 22:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-02T22:21:00.000Z","author":"Kumioko","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kumioko-2012-01-02T22:21:00.000Z-Category:Photographs_of_the_American_Old_West","replies":["c-Kumioko-2012-01-03T04:16:00.000Z-Kumioko-2012-01-02T22:21:00.000Z"]}}-->

I tried to be patient thinking you were busy but since you have been working and responding to other questions since I left mine I think your ignoring me so I guess I will just recreate the category. I shouldn't have to recreate a maintenance category like this just because it doesn't have an image in it at the moment. I guess I will have to go through and mark the 800+ maintenance categories with the big ugly Admins please don't delete me if I'm empty banner. --Kumioko (talk) 04:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T04:16:00.000Z","author":"Kumioko","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kumioko-2012-01-03T04:16:00.000Z-Kumioko-2012-01-02T22:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:19:00.000Z-Kumioko-2012-01-03T04:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

I find it rather irrational that you gave me only six hours to respond before assuming that your message was going to be ignored. For the record, Wikipedia:There is no deadline, and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a volunteer service. I respond to talk page queries as soon as I have time. Have patience! -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T07:19:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:19:00.000Z-Kumioko-2012-01-03T04:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Kumioko-2012-01-03T12:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

Frankly as an experienced editor you should have known better than to delete that category anyway since its obviously a maintenance category. I shouldn't have to tag hundreds of categories with an unnecessary gaudy message when the purpose of the category is obvious but yet this is the 10th time just in the last couple months I've had to restore one of these because some admin has deleted it without going through a proper CFD process. And just because Wikipedia:There is no deadline, and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a volunteer service is true of others time as well. --Kumioko (talk) 12:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T12:18:00.000Z","author":"Kumioko","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Kumioko-2012-01-03T12:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:19:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

No sooner after Johnny de Brest was deleted again that it was recreated. Same old spam, from the same user, it appears. Can you delete it again, and salt it please? --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T02:54:00.000Z","author":"Ohconfucius","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ohconfucius-2012-01-03T02:54:00.000Z-salting","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:34:00.000Z-Ohconfucius-2012-01-03T02:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

That won't be necessary. If User:BergHollywood recreates the page again, let me know and we'll remedy this with blocks, not salts. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T07:34:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:34:00.000Z-Ohconfucius-2012-01-03T02:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

174.99.36.246 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) contacted me and Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) about making a file for North Carolina. Contribs are in some of the same articles Oldus66 edited. Looks like a duck... –Fredddie™ 03:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T03:23:00.000Z","author":"Fredddie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fredddie-2012-01-03T03:23:00.000Z-Possibly_User:Oldus66_again","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:36:00.000Z-Fredddie-2012-01-03T03:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

Blocked – for a period of 3 months hope that helps. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T07:36:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-03T07:36:00.000Z-Fredddie-2012-01-03T03:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Please take a look at this page and what anonymous has done there. It is non-cooperative editor who obviously wants to prevent anyone else from editing the article. Alliumnsk (talk) 08:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T08:11:00.000Z","author":"Alliumnsk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Alliumnsk-2012-01-03T08:11:00.000Z-Talk:Nikon_1_series","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-03T09:04:00.000Z-Alliumnsk-2012-01-03T08:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

Warned user. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 09:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T09:04:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-03T09:04:00.000Z-Alliumnsk-2012-01-03T08:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-77.185.11.84-2012-01-03T09:22:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-03T09:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm surprised. You gave no reasons. 77.185.11.84 (talk) 09:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T09:22:00.000Z","author":"77.185.11.84","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-77.185.11.84-2012-01-03T09:22:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-03T09:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

restored from archive for (delayed) reply

Could I ask you to explain the above closure more. It seems to me that, in your closure, you make no mention of our "policy" of respecting the copyright of countries even when there are not copyright relations and so the images are PD in the US (I discuss this more fully at the PUF). The reason I ask is that your closure is being used as some sort of precedence at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 22#Template:PD-Iran in US. I think they are mistaken in this usage and are confusing law with policy and not recognising that policy can go further than law. If you closed the discussion simply because they are PD and PUF isn't the place to discuss whether their use is allowed within policy then this will obviously have quite a different meaning to if you closed the discussion meaning the images are PD and we can use them within policy. If you did intend the second sort of closure I would ask for an explanation of while you think their use is allowed given what is stated at WP:C and in the e-mail. I do not think that a PUF discussion is the appropriate venue to be having such a discussion so I think an RfC should be held - that is of course unless I've missed some previous discussion. Dpmuk (talk) 00:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-31T00:53:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2011-12-31T00:53:00.000Z-PUF_Closure:_Footage_of_US_RQ-170_from_Iranian_sources","replies":["c-Fastily-2011-12-31T07:27:00.000Z-Dpmuk-2011-12-31T00:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hm, yes, in that PUF discussion, I was definitely only evaluating the copyright status of files in the US. The scope of WP:PUF is restricted to determining the copyright status of files and not whether a file is within policy. Your concerns are valid however, and this should be raised at WP:FFD and/or WP:RfC. At any rate, if I'm not mistaken, there is currently no policy that discusses copyright with regards to nations the US has no copyright relations with. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-31T07:27:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2011-12-31T07:27:00.000Z-Dpmuk-2011-12-31T00:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dpmuk-2012-01-03T09:19:00.000Z-Fastily-2011-12-31T07:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry for the delayed reply to this but I've been visiting friends and family over Christmas and new year and not had a chance to reply. I believe the situation is unclear as to whether there is a policy, hence the reason I've used it in quotes when I first use it. This topic appears to be in a bit of a weird situation thanks to when it was last considered (2005). WP:C is a policy and makes reference to the fact that we should respect copyright in this situation. That said WP:C discusses legal issues and this isn't one so it's in a weird place. I also doubt there has ever been a full discussion of the issue as WP:C refers to an e-mail from Jimbo from a time when, I believe, his word was largely taken as what should be done. I also think that the position stated at WP:C is at odds with how we now treat images more generally where we use images that are PD in the US but copyrighted in their country of origin. Given all the above I think we need a discussion to clarify the situation and I plan on starting an RfC on the issue in the next couple of days. In the meantime I don't think we should be encouraging the use of such images as it will create work if the RfC decides we shouldn't use them, but at the same time I don't think we need worry about deleting existing images, even though, in my opinion, deletion of such images is justified by WP:C. Dpmuk (talk) 09:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T09:19:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-03T09:19:00.000Z-Fastily-2011-12-31T07:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Commons/Drives. --Leyo 13:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T13:08:00.000Z","author":"Leyo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Leyo-2012-01-04T13:08:00.000Z-Files_in_Category:Move_to_Commons_Priority_Candidates_that_are_already_on_Common","replies":[]}}-->

Please could you undelete the Two Envelopes Problem subsidiary Talk page "sources". The chronological list of all publications on this topic is a vital resource for editors of this page. For some time it had been a subsidiary page to the main article but a consensus had been reached that it should be moved out of main article space. But not deleted altogether. Richard Gill (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T12:50:00.000Z","author":"Gill110951","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gill110951-2012-01-03T12:50:00.000Z-Please_undelete_Talk:Two_Envelopes_Problem\/sources","replies":["c-Bulwersator-2012-01-03T12:52:00.000Z-Gill110951-2012-01-03T12:50:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Richard Gill"}}-->

• This page was never deleted Bulwersator (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T12:52:00.000Z","author":"Bulwersator","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Bulwersator-2012-01-03T12:52:00.000Z-Gill110951-2012-01-03T12:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gill110951-2012-01-03T14:05:00.000Z-Bulwersator-2012-01-03T12:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

Dear Bulwersator, to be precise, I think that Two envelopes problem/sources has been deleted, and that this deletion automatically also destroyed Talk:Two envelopes problem/sources.

I had been trying to move the former to the latter, since the former had been up for merge or deletion for some time. The actual consensus was to move the page to a subpage of the talk page of the main article.

If that is impossible, please put a recent version of Two envelopes problem/sources back in my user space, or iNic's. Richard Gill (talk) 14:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T14:05:00.000Z","author":"Gill110951","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gill110951-2012-01-03T14:05:00.000Z-Bulwersator-2012-01-03T12:52:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Richard Gill"}}-->

Here is the notice at Two envelopes problem/sources:

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

07:59, 3 January 2012 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "Two envelopes problem/sources" ‎ (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace)

12:38, 17 August 2011 RHaworth (talk | contribs) moved Two envelopes problem/sources to User:INic/sandbox [without redirect] ‎ (revert)

The day before, I had moved the content of Two envelopes problem/sources to Talk:Two envelopes problem/sources, and replaced it with a redirect to the main article. Richard Gill (talk) 14:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T14:24:00.000Z","author":"Gill110951","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gill110951-2012-01-03T14:24:00.000Z-Please_undelete_Talk:Two_Envelopes_Problem\/sources","replies":["c-INic-2012-01-04T04:38:00.000Z-Gill110951-2012-01-03T14:24:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Richard Gill"}}-->

I think we lost it. :-( iNic (talk) 04:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T04:38:00.000Z","author":"INic","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-INic-2012-01-04T04:38:00.000Z-Gill110951-2012-01-03T14:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily, or Bulwersator, can you temporarily recover Two envelopes problem/sources for us? I hope it has not been lost forever. Richard Gill (talk) 07:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:44:00.000Z","author":"Gill110951","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gill110951-2012-01-04T07:44:00.000Z-Please_undelete_Talk:Two_Envelopes_Problem\/sources","replies":[],"displayName":"Richard Gill"}}-->

Wondering why Marc Ecko's Wikipedia page was deleted. I noticed that you listed the reason as Unambiguous advertising and promotion. However, Wikipedia:CSD G11. explains that articles written from a neutral point of view don't apply under that criterion. If indeed you believe there is bias, please restore the page so we can fix it - Marc Ecko is clearly a notable enough public figure that he should be included. Transatlanick (talk) 14:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T14:58:00.000Z","author":"Transatlanick","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Transatlanick-2012-01-03T14:58:00.000Z-Deletion_of_Marc_Ecko","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:00:00.000Z-Transatlanick-2012-01-03T14:58:00.000Z"]}}-->

Marc Ecko? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:00:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:00:00.000Z-Transatlanick-2012-01-03T14:58:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This file, which you've deleted twice, is back. [3] Nelsondenis248 brought this to a "request for undeletion," which is for noncontroversial requests, rather than bringing this to deletion review, and apparently the administrator who undeleted it was not aware of the history of this file. I've raised the issue on his/her talk page. ScottyBerg (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T15:09:00.000Z","author":"ScottyBerg","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ScottyBerg-2012-01-03T15:09:00.000Z-Nelson_Dennis.jpg,_again","replies":[]}}-->

It's been re-deleted. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T18:03:00.000Z","author":"ScottyBerg","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ScottyBerg-2012-01-03T18:03:00.000Z-Nelson_Dennis.jpg,_again","replies":["c-MGA73-2012-01-03T18:50:00.000Z-ScottyBerg-2012-01-03T18:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

Perhaps you could comment on commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Denis_Photo-1.jpg --MGA73 (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T18:50:00.000Z","author":"MGA73","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-MGA73-2012-01-03T18:50:00.000Z-ScottyBerg-2012-01-03T18:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-ScottyBerg-2012-01-03T20:19:00.000Z-MGA73-2012-01-03T18:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks very much. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T20:19:00.000Z","author":"ScottyBerg","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-ScottyBerg-2012-01-03T20:19:00.000Z-MGA73-2012-01-03T18:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Why have you removed the article about the Långaryd family. It is NOT hoax. The family's is in Guinness Book of World Records in two places so it is wrong to say that the family is just a fiction. One can argue whether it is correct to call it a family by definition, but the concept is a reality.

Read more about the family at http://langarydsslakten.se/english.htm

--Magol (talk) 16:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T16:23:00.000Z","author":"Magol","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Magol-2012-01-03T16:23:00.000Z-L\u00e5ngaryd_family","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:00:00.000Z-Magol-2012-01-03T16:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#PROD -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:00:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:00:00.000Z-Magol-2012-01-03T16:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I was wondering if you could please say why this image of a painting made by someone who died over 70 years ago was deleted? I seem to remember applying a PD Art tag when I uploaded it.Rodolph (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T20:37:00.000Z","author":"Rodolph","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rodolph-2012-01-03T20:37:00.000Z-File:RodolphFaneDeSalisbyGSWatson.jpg","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:02:00.000Z-Rodolph-2012-01-03T20:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

Since you added an OTRS pending tag to the file, let's wait for the OTRS team to process the email you sent. Once they do that, the file will be automatically restored. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:02:00.000Z-Rodolph-2012-01-03T20:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Rodolph-2012-01-07T22:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

thank you. Rodolph (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T22:18:00.000Z","author":"Rodolph","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Rodolph-2012-01-07T22:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. I had Use case diagram watchlisted, and IIRC, I remember other users having contributed to it. Whenever you have a minute, could you userify it at User:Mann_jess/Use_case_diagram? I'd like to see if any of it is salvageable for a new article. Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Mann jess","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:36:00.000Z-Use_Case_Diagram","replies":["c-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:37:00.000Z-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:36:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Jess"}}-->

BTW, no rush on this. I won't be able to get to it for another day or so anyway. So, this request is very much "at your leisure". :) Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T00:37:00.000Z","author":"Mann jess","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:37:00.000Z-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:08:00.000Z-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:37:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Jess"}}-->

Unfortunately, content deleted under G12 cannot be userfied. I'm afraid there's not much I can do; the page and its previous versions were a pretty blatant copyvios. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:08:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:08:00.000Z-Mann_jess-2012-01-04T00:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, I have been asked to re-examine the file you recently deleted of File:Cuthbert covercropped.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). I would like to restore the image and add {{Non-free promotional}} for the missing license, which appears to have been missed as an oversight. In consideration that the book is the earliest in existence for Europe and the image is being used by the British Library trustees as part of a campaign to purchase the artefact for £9m, is there any other reason that this image was problematic that needs to be fixed? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 04:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T04:32:00.000Z","author":"F\u00e6","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-F\u00e6-2012-01-04T04:32:00.000Z-Cuthbert_covercropped.jpg","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:09:00.000Z-F\u00e6-2012-01-04T04:32:00.000Z"]}}-->

As far as I can see, no. Feel free to restore. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:09:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:09:00.000Z-F\u00e6-2012-01-04T04:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-F\u00e6-2012-01-04T05:31:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks, now done. --Fæ (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:31:00.000Z","author":"F\u00e6","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-F\u00e6-2012-01-04T05:31:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

It looks like you deleted File:Cg logo reduced.jpg at 23:37 and it was recreated again at 23:45 but for some reason I cannot determine where I can view the log. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T04:56:00.000Z","author":"Ww2censor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T04:56:00.000Z-Image_recreation","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:10:00.000Z-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T04:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

[4]? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:10:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:10:00.000Z-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T04:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T05:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks, but how do I get to an image log on a normal image page? However, the deleted image now exists again. ww2censor (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:28:00.000Z","author":"Ww2censor","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T05:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T05:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

History -> "View logs for this page" (Directly underneath "Revision history of....", upper right corner). Is that what you were referring to? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T05:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T06:08:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

I thought I knew my way around the pages better than that. Thanks again. ww2censor (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T06:08:00.000Z","author":"Ww2censor","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ww2censor-2012-01-04T06:08:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

FYI. =) --slakr^\ talk / 05:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z","author":"Slakr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Slakr-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Bots\/Requests_for_approval\/Fbot_15","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:39:00.000Z-Slakr-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah, yes, I'll get around to that in a bit. Thanks for letting me know. Best, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:39:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:39:00.000Z-Slakr-2012-01-04T05:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Could you please undelete File:Senior Trooper insignia.jpg? This file was originally created and uploaded by User:SGT141 on November 15, 2007. It was edited/revised by User:DanTD on November 23, 2007. The image had or should have had license and release information nearly identical to File:Master Trooper logo.jpg which is a candidate for transfer to commons. The image File:Senior Trooper insignia.jpg was used the the articles Senior trooper and Louisiana State Police. I do not have a copy of the file to re-upload, and therefore ask that you please undelete this photo so that I may fix whatever issues there seems to be with the license tags, release information, etc. Sf46 (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T06:13:00.000Z","author":"Sf46","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sf46-2012-01-04T06:13:00.000Z-Please_un_delete_page","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T06:23:00.000Z-Sf46-2012-01-04T06:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 06:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T06:23:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T06:23:00.000Z-Sf46-2012-01-04T06:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Please hold off on deleting the voice userboxes - I am in the process of a restore. Requested at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Double_sharp&oldid=469467839#Voice_Userboxes Thanks  7  07:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:05:00.000Z","author":"7","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-7-2012-01-04T07:05:00.000Z-Too_fast","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:18:00.000Z-7-2012-01-04T07:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

I trust you left a similar message for User:Ronhjones, yes? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:18:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:18:00.000Z-7-2012-01-04T07:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-7-2012-01-04T07:31:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

No - Ronhjones was tagging them back in Dec... I just was giving you a headsup because you were deleting them faster than I could remove the CSD tags after restoring them. Regards.  7  07:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:31:00.000Z","author":"7","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-7-2012-01-04T07:31:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:18:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:35:00.000Z-7-2012-01-04T07:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah, I see. That makes sense then. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:35:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:35:00.000Z-7-2012-01-04T07:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

We note that you have deleted the page:

National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority

The reason code was G11 which I understand refers to unambiguous promotion - this was not our intention.

We will recreate the page and attempt to provide more useful text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.153.243.230 (talk) 07:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:15:00.000Z","author":"203.153.243.230","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-203.153.243.230-2012-01-04T07:15:00.000Z-Deletion_not_warranted","replies":[]}}-->

Can you restore me the diffs of File:Utopian Dances cover.jpg because I wanted to demonstrate a bug in FTCG here.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 08:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T08:17:00.000Z","author":"Ankit Maity","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T08:17:00.000Z-Restoration_request","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T08:23:00.000Z-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T08:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Can't restore it, but I'll give you a screencap - File:FTCGBugTemporary.png -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 08:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T08:23:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T08:23:00.000Z-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T08:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T10:44:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T08:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank You.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 10:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T10:44:00.000Z","author":"Ankit Maity","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T10:44:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T08:23:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily

Here is a reformulation of my recent request concerning deletion of Talk:Two envelopes problem/sources.

Bulwersator responded to my request, saying that the page had not been deleted. What has happened is, I think, is the following. Two envelopes problem/sources has been deleted, and this deletion has automatically also destroyed Talk:Two envelopes problem/sources. I had been trying to move the former to the latter, since the former had been up for merge or deletion for some time. The actual consensus was to move the page to a subpage of the talk page of the main article.

To be precise, the day before, I had moved the content of Two envelopes problem/sources to Talk:Two envelopes problem/sources, and replaced it with a redirect to the main article, in line with another sub-Talk-page, Talk:Two envelopes problem/Arguments. I was stupid enough not to keep a personal back-up copy.

If undeletion is impossible, please put a recent version of Two envelopes problem/sources back in my user space, or iNic's. Or has it now gone forever? Richard Gill (talk) 09:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T09:07:00.000Z","author":"Gill110951","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gill110951-2012-01-04T09:07:00.000Z-Please_undelete_Two_envelopes_problem\/sources","replies":[],"displayName":"Richard Gill"}}-->

PS. Here is the notice at Two envelopes problem/sources:

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

07:59, 3 January 2012 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "Two envelopes problem/sources" ‎ (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace)

12:38, 17 August 2011 RHaworth (talk | contribs) moved Two envelopes problem/sources to User:INic/sandbox [without redirect] ‎ (revert)

Is this it? Click here to view it -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 09:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T09:46:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T09:46:00.000Z-Please_undelete_Two_envelopes_problem\/sources","replies":[]}}-->

please reconsider, these wrongful deletions. these are in strict accordance with the NFCC. there can be no non-free alternative to 3D art. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 00:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T00:17:00.000Z","author":"Slowking4","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Slowking4-2012-01-03T00:17:00.000Z-deletion_of_Iroquois-di-suvero.jpg_&_File:800px-Occidental_Avenue_South_(Seattle","replies":["c-Leyo-2012-01-03T09:12:00.000Z-Slowking4-2012-01-03T00:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Did you intentionally transfer Commons:File:Occidental Avenue South (Seattle, Washington).jpg to en.wikipedia in a clumsy way? --Leyo 09:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T09:12:00.000Z","author":"Leyo","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Leyo-2012-01-03T09:12:00.000Z-Slowking4-2012-01-03T00:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Slowking4-2012-01-03T17:28:00.000Z-Leyo-2012-01-03T09:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

thank you; @leyo - well, there is no bot, as the other way. the image upload is so clunky, i'm surprised anything gets done. perhaps the elegance will increase when the upload wizard rewrite is done. what we need is an upload that lets you choose where it goes based on a dialogue. meta data is in history but there is no way to capture it from commons. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 17:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T17:28:00.000Z","author":"Slowking4","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Slowking4-2012-01-03T17:28:00.000Z-Leyo-2012-01-03T09:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-Leyo-2012-01-03T17:34:00.000Z-Slowking4-2012-01-03T17:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

I refer to the “800px-” in the file name that normally occurs when folks transfer the preview version instead of the full size. In your case the low resolution is wanted, but probably not this ugly file name. --Leyo 17:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T17:34:00.000Z","author":"Leyo","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Leyo-2012-01-03T17:34:00.000Z-Slowking4-2012-01-03T17:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Slowking4-2012-01-05T03:22:00.000Z-Leyo-2012-01-03T17:34:00.000Z"]}}-->

that's what it names it, when i download from commons. i could change the name, but why when it goes to the smaller size, not that the reduce size bot cares. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T03:22:00.000Z","author":"Slowking4","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Slowking4-2012-01-05T03:22:00.000Z-Leyo-2012-01-03T17:34:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I will inform you when the bug is solved.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 10:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T10:45:00.000Z","author":"Ankit Maity","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T10:45:00.000Z-Restoration_request_2","replies":["c-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T11:16:00.000Z-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T10:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

It can be deleted now.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 11:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T11:16:00.000Z","author":"Ankit Maity","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T11:16:00.000Z-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T10:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:25:00.000Z-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T11:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:25:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:25:00.000Z-Ankit_Maity-2012-01-04T11:16:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• Hi, what is the reason for deletion of article about contemporary georgian artist Ketevan Kalandadze? Maxim Sablev (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T11:45:00.000Z","author":"Maxim Sablev","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Maxim_Sablev-2012-01-04T11:45:00.000Z-Ketevan_Kalandadze","replies":[]}}-->

"no ref added". Looks like the editor who tagged the page forgot to enter their reasoning into the deletion template. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:27:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:27:00.000Z-Ketevan_Kalandadze","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I found second publication in major media covering Silent Life movie. Here are the link to both publications mentioning the movie. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/ef444a56-24dd-11e1-bfb3-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1iPu7iOoj

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15674340

May I ask you to restore article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silent_Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by MisterFirst (talk • contribs) 14:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T14:55:00.000Z","author":"MisterFirst","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MisterFirst-2012-01-04T14:55:00.000Z-Silent_Life_restoration_request","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:28:00.000Z-MisterFirst-2012-01-04T14:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G4 -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:28:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:28:00.000Z-MisterFirst-2012-01-04T14:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily,

Happy New Year. I noticed that my article University of Oxford Georgian Society has been deleted as a similar one has been deleted previously. I have specifically redrafted the new article to address all the issues that were in the Oxford Georgian Society article (specifically removed sections on the current society, its president etc, basically all the info that does not have at least 2-3 reliable sources). I think its an interesting article and there are tens of wiki pages on other oxford university socities, so its not the topic that was an issue but content, that has been fixed - its all well documentted and cited. Please let me know if its possible to reinstate the page and I'll be happy to run you through the changes made.

Best regards,

David — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.172.3.95 (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T15:48:00.000Z","author":"118.172.3.95","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-118.172.3.95-2012-01-04T15:48:00.000Z-University_of_Oxford_Georgian_Society","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:28:00.000Z-118.172.3.95-2012-01-04T15:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G4 -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:28:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:28:00.000Z-118.172.3.95-2012-01-04T15:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, could you take a look at user WhoSays edits on Eric Saade, I think that the user has made the article into an unsourced and commentary version deleting alot of sourced material on December 25. If you find that to be so too please take some action as the user has been warned several times now. Sincerely.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T17:24:00.000Z","author":"BabbaQ","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BabbaQ-2012-01-04T17:24:00.000Z-Hi","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z-BabbaQ-2012-01-04T17:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

Warned user. The last time they made such edits was on December 29th. If the user makes unsourced claims or adds OR again, let me know and I'll block. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z-BabbaQ-2012-01-04T17:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily, This is Ryan, the Dakota Curling Club President, I believe the information on http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/dakota-curling-club/history.html was taken from wikipedia and not the other way around. For example, compare the information for the St. Paul Curling Club with that on spiritus-temporis. Likewise compare the Geographic information for St Paul with that on spiritus-temporis and you'll see that the spiritus temporis is nearly identical to parts of the wikipedia entry. In fact, spiritus temporis says they get their data from publicly available sources, probably including wikipedia. Please undelete our wikipedia page Dakota Curling Club entry. Thanks, Ryan DCCLeagueMgr (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z","author":"DCCLeagueMgr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z-Please_undelete_Dakota_Curling_Club","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G12 -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Silliest deletion I ever heard of. All of the information was there when I uploaded it. Now I have to do it all over again, assuming I can find it on my hard drive. What a waste. No wonder the number of editors is going downhill. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T20:20:00.000Z","author":"GeorgeLouis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GeorgeLouis-2012-01-04T20:20:00.000Z-File:Frazier_Peak_directional_sign.jpg","replies":["c-Zscout370-2012-01-04T20:32:00.000Z-GeorgeLouis-2012-01-04T20:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

We can restore images, so you don't need to find it on your hard drive. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T20:32:00.000Z","author":"Zscout370","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Zscout370-2012-01-04T20:32:00.000Z-GeorgeLouis-2012-01-04T20:20:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User:Zscout370"}}-->

It is cool that you work on the ogg-files so that we can get rid of the junk and move the good files for Commons. However, there is a problem with some of the files. It is not possible to see that they are used unless you check "what links here". So I checked the files you nominated for deletion and moved some of the files that was in use to Commons.

As an example you could check Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_26#File:Gettherebeforedark.ogg. There is nothing under File:Gettherebeforedark.ogg#File usage but under What links here.

The problem also make the bot tag used files as orphan. --MGA73 (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T20:58:00.000Z","author":"MGA73","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MGA73-2012-01-04T20:58:00.000Z-(Un)used_ogg-files","replies":["c-Alpha_Quadrant-2012-01-04T21:41:00.000Z-MGA73-2012-01-04T20:58:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker) That particular file is incorrectly licensed. The description at G.I. Joe Adventure Team#Commander Voice suggests that the original uploader copied off of the original recording. There is no evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder. As to the file tagging, if a file just has links to it, then it is not in use. The orphaned tag is meant to allow us to keep track of files with no transclusions. As many orphaned files are on orphaned file lists, if we discounted files with mere links, we would miss quite a few files that don't have any real translusions. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 21:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T21:41:00.000Z","author":"Alpha Quadrant","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Alpha_Quadrant-2012-01-04T21:41:00.000Z-MGA73-2012-01-04T20:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-MGA73-2012-01-04T22:01:00.000Z-Alpha_Quadrant-2012-01-04T21:41:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Alpha_Quadrant"}}-->

If someone incorrectly uses a file via a link instead of a real translusion then in my opinion the solution is not to delete the file but to correct the article.

Most of the files that was in use was used via a template and not just a plain link. Example File:Winnipeg.ogg that is used via {{IPAc-en|audio=Winnipeg.ogg|ˈ|w|ɪ|n|ɪ|p|ɛ|ɡ}}. If that is not a valid use then we should delete the IPAc-en template.

So my point is just that it is best to check "what links here" before a file is nominated for deletion as unused.

If the file is unfree I think it is better to delete it as unfree than as unused/unusable. --MGA73 (talk) 22:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T22:01:00.000Z","author":"MGA73","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-MGA73-2012-01-04T22:01:00.000Z-Alpha_Quadrant-2012-01-04T21:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:34:00.000Z-MGA73-2012-01-04T22:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

Alright, I'll see what I can do -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:34:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:34:00.000Z-MGA73-2012-01-04T22:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I removed all of the copyright infringing text yet the article was still deleted. Just wanted to know if there was another reason that the article was deleted, Thanks.1906cubs (talk) 00:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T00:47:00.000Z","author":"1906cubs","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-1906cubs-2012-01-05T00:47:00.000Z-1994_Cotton_Bowl","replies":["c-Nolelover-2012-01-05T00:58:00.000Z-1906cubs-2012-01-05T00:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

1906, I will recreate the article without the copyright content in just a minute, and then you can add on as much as you want (provided of course, its not copyright-infringing). Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 00:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T00:58:00.000Z","author":"Nolelover","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Nolelover-2012-01-05T00:58:00.000Z-1906cubs-2012-01-05T00:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-Nolelover-2012-01-05T01:07:00.000Z-Nolelover-2012-01-05T00:58:00.000Z"]}}-->

I have recreated the article. Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 01:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T01:07:00.000Z","author":"Nolelover","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Nolelover-2012-01-05T01:07:00.000Z-Nolelover-2012-01-05T00:58:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This does not seem to satisfy WP:BOTPOL#Good communication, nor does it seem to be to be an appropriate response to someone questioning you about your actions. What, exactly, was rude about Thincat's comments that deserved summary removal instead of a reply? Anomie⚔ 02:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T02:43:00.000Z","author":"Anomie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anomie-2012-01-05T02:43:00.000Z-Bot_operator_communications","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:36:00.000Z-Anomie-2012-01-05T02:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

It wasn't the nicest message. Regardless, I have done or am doing what was asked. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:36:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:36:00.000Z-Anomie-2012-01-05T02:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, I saw that you deleted a page called Tony Colbert, the doctor at Arsenal F.C. which was not created by me but you deleted. I just want to know why you deleted it or what violations the article had (not notable etc). Thanks. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T03:25:00.000Z","author":"Arsenalkid700","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-05T03:25:00.000Z-Tony_Colbert","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:37:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-05T03:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#PROD -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:37:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:37:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-05T03:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily, Did you read the discussion at the talk page contesting the speedy delete nomination of Jehovah's Witness beliefs? The Watchtower Information Service website has clearly lifted content from the Wikipedia page, not the other way round. As the page unambiguously states, their content was added in 2010; the original Wikipedia article was created in 2006 and revised constantly since then. (Much of the information at the specific article on the Watchtower Information Service website is actually my work, written on Wikipedia and then lifted by them.) The 1999 copyright note on the external website clearly referred to the website, not specific pages. The nominator of this supposed copyvio is running a campaign to force the deletion of pages that contain material critical of his religion. Would you please restore the page? BlackCab (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:27:00.000Z","author":"BlackCab","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BlackCab-2012-01-05T04:27:00.000Z-Deletion_of_Jehovah's_Witness_beliefs","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:38:00.000Z-BlackCab-2012-01-05T04:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

Fair enough.  Restored -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:38:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:38:00.000Z-BlackCab-2012-01-05T04:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-173.209.98.181-2012-01-05T04:39:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Appologies, but would you mind restoring the talk page as well? 173.209.98.181 (talk) 04:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:39:00.000Z","author":"173.209.98.181","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-173.209.98.181-2012-01-05T04:39:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:40:00.000Z-173.209.98.181-2012-01-05T04:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Already done? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:40:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:40:00.000Z-173.209.98.181-2012-01-05T04:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-173.209.98.181-2012-01-05T04:42:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:40:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yup, my bad. I saw it wasn't there, but by the time I left the comment, you had brought it back. Sorry! 173.209.98.181 (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:42:00.000Z","author":"173.209.98.181","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-173.209.98.181-2012-01-05T04:42:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:40:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I noticed you restored the page and I was wondering about the results of the investigation of the page with regards to possible copyright infringement. The page that it mirrors seems to give two conflicting dates, which have been the subject of some dispute. The copyright on the page is from 1999, and while it's possible that the page was created on a later date, I can't conclusively say that it was. Is there any way the publishers of the page can be contacted to verify a date the article was written by them , as they obviously do not state that they copied the article directly from Wikipedia, I think it's somewhat presumptuous to assume that they did, and more likely that an individual editor, years ago, chose to copy it from them and claim it as their own. It really is simply a matter of making sure that Wikipedia is not in violation of copyright laws and not as the editor previously stated, "a campaign to force the deletion of pages that contain material critical of his religion." which of itself is a false accusation because this is the only page I have ever nominated for deletion and that because of it's failure to adhere to WP:NPOV and the recently discovered likely copyright infringement. Willietell (talk) 05:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:07:00.000Z","author":"Willietell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:07:00.000Z-Deletion_of_Jehovah's_Witness_beliefs","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:09:00.000Z-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

If that is the case, please consider nominating this page for deletion at WP:AfD -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:09:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:09:00.000Z-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

I already nominated it for deletion, you deleted it, then resorted it at the insistence of User:BlackCab. I believe if you really look at the article this page mirrors http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/doctrine-changes/jehovah-witness-beliefs/ you will notice that the website contains much more information, leading the logical person to conclude that it contains the original material, and that the Wikipedia page plagiarizes it by taking out choice subheadings and using them as the basis for the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_beliefs . While I was trying to discuss the page in talk, one of the editors provided a link to the page, stating that it was an official site of Jehovah's Witnesses. I don't think there can really be any question to the reasonable person that the site contained the article first, though there is a date indicated of 6 July 2009, this date seems to be the date of a revision of the article and not the date of it's original writing. Please investigate further, thanks. Willietell (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:28:00.000Z","author":"Willietell","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-BlackCab-2012-01-05T06:07:00.000Z-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Willietell is wrong. The "Beliefs" page on the external website, which is datestamped July 6, 2009, is evidently a copy of the Wikipedia page Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses before it was split into two separate pages on "Beliefs" and "Practices". It doesn't have the "Defection" section which I added in April 2009,[5] and apart from other minor differences, the external website's text is pretty well a straight lift from that Wikipedia article as it looked around that time. Should Willietell nominate the page as an AfD (which will be his third attempt to have the whole shebang deleted on the grounds that it is "all lies" and now a copyvio) I can examine the evidence in more detail there. Right now Willietell is being a nuisance and wasting other editors' time. BlackCab (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T06:07:00.000Z","author":"BlackCab","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-BlackCab-2012-01-05T06:07:00.000Z-Willietell-2012-01-05T05:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jeffro77-2012-01-05T07:52:00.000Z-BlackCab-2012-01-05T06:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Editors who have been working on the article for several years are well aware that the information on the other website is a mirror of an earlier version of the Wikipedia article. Willietell has been trying to have the article deleted on any grounds he can find because he has difficulty accepting statements made about his religion by secondary sources. First he claimed it is an attack page which was immediately dismissed by an admin, and now he's lied about it being a copyvio. Surely it is time to do something about his disruptive behaviour?!--Jeffro77 (talk) 07:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T07:52:00.000Z","author":"Jeffro77","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Jeffro77-2012-01-05T07:52:00.000Z-BlackCab-2012-01-05T06:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Since you're so excellent at handling RPP, would you please go there and clear the massive backlog (AN got no-one to respond)?Jasper Deng (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:25:00.000Z","author":"Jasper Deng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-05T05:25:00.000Z-RPP_needs_you","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:26:00.000Z-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-05T05:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

>.> -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:26:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:26:00.000Z-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-05T05:25:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:45:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done now. Regards, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:45:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:45:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:26:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey there Fastily, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fastily/TMI.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:40:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2012-01-05T05:40:00.000Z-Non-free_files_in_your_user_space","replies":[]}}-->

Thought I should let you know, I'm not sure what Marek was trying to do with that page. I've notified him at his talk page about it, but I'm guessing it was somehow created in error. Calabe1992 05:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:43:00.000Z","author":"Calabe1992","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Calabe1992-2012-01-05T05:43:00.000Z-Talk:Anastasia_Andrianova","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:45:00.000Z-Calabe1992-2012-01-05T05:43:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Calabe"}}-->

Gone now. Regards, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:45:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T05:45:00.000Z-Calabe1992-2012-01-05T05:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For clearing a massive backlog at RPP. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T05:46:00.000Z","author":"Jasper Deng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-05T05:46:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T06:14:00.000Z-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-05T05:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you!! Glad I was able to help. Best, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 06:14, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T06:14:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T06:14:00.000Z-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-05T05:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

In working on that little task of 'Non-free files with orphaned versions' - I've noticed the first pass(es) of Fbot haven't picked up a goodly number of these files. Sorry I didn't tag them, but will do so in the future if needed to see why the Bot didn't pick them up. Skier Dude (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T06:01:00.000Z","author":"Skier Dude","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skier_Dude-2012-01-05T06:01:00.000Z-Time_for_a_second_(or_more?)_pass_for_Fbot?","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z-Skier_Dude-2012-01-05T06:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

It has been awhile since I last ran that task. The soonest I can run it again will be tomorrow. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z-Skier_Dude-2012-01-05T06:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:16:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Wait a minute...are you referring to Fbot task 8 or Fbot task 11? -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T07:16:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:16:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The Admin's Barnstar

For clearing a massive backlog at RPP and giving my bot work to do. :D →Στc. 06:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T06:42:00.000Z","author":"\u03a3","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u03a3-2012-01-05T06:42:00.000Z-Another_barnstar_for_you!","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z-\u03a3-2012-01-05T06:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you!!!  :) Cheers, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T07:02:00.000Z-\u03a3-2012-01-05T06:42:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, You've deleted my article about the NALIS Foundation and state it's some ambiguous copyright infringement. It is MY article and its my business to use my paragraphs in other publications I write. I'd really appreciate it if you could possibly put it back and relate it again to the Bulgarian version, because I can't dedicate too much time on writing things like that. Besides the article in the Italian periodical is written LATER than that in WIKI, I didn't copy it for wiki. Perhaps I made a mistake by not signing in when submitting the English version, but the truth is that I forgot my password and how I did it with the Bulgarian one. You can easily contact me via email: ekaterina.dikova@nalis.bg Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Ekaterina Dikova NALIS Project Manager 85.14.25.189 (talk) 09:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T09:02:00.000Z","author":"85.14.25.189","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-85.14.25.189-2012-01-05T09:02:00.000Z-Another_barnstar_for_you!","replies":["c-Abhijay-2012-01-05T09:39:00.000Z-85.14.25.189-2012-01-05T09:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ekaterina, please see WP:OWN. Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 09:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T09:39:00.000Z","author":"Abhijay","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Abhijay-2012-01-05T09:39:00.000Z-85.14.25.189-2012-01-05T09:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I told people only a few hours ago on IRC that I'd give a jar of cookies to the admin who closes this TFD thread. One admin said they would go buy their own jar of cookies. Not only did you do it, you did it in a matter of hours, when I expected it to be sitting for days. Here is a jar of cookies! And thank you :) -- DQ (t) (e) 09:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T09:31:00.000Z","author":"DeltaQuad","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DeltaQuad-2012-01-05T09:31:00.000Z-A_cookie_jar_for_you!","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T10:07:00.000Z-DeltaQuad-2012-01-05T09:31:00.000Z"],"displayName":"DQ"}}-->

Thanks!! Happy to have been able to help. Cheers, FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 10:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T10:07:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T10:07:00.000Z-DeltaQuad-2012-01-05T09:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Michael_Bednarek-2012-01-05T10:57:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T10:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Respect. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T10:57:00.000Z","author":"Michael Bednarek","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Michael_Bednarek-2012-01-05T10:57:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-05T10:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

It's orphaned because I removed it from the article about the artist. The reason why I removed it from the article about the artist is because it's an invalid fair use, because it's not being used in an article about the album, and thus an f7 seems to be valid. Besides, I think it's a hoax. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 21:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-03T21:43:00.000Z","author":"The Mark of the Beast","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-03T21:43:00.000Z-File:Single_Trash.jpg","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:05:00.000Z-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-03T21:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

Then you probably should have tagged it with G3 in the first place. Files meet the criteria for immediate deletion under WP:CSD#F7 if they are using a clearly invalid license tag or if the file is sourced to a news agency in which the file is not the subject of critical commentary in the article which it is linked to. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 05:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T05:05:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:05:00.000Z-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-03T21:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T07:07:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

OK, then I'm confused, because isn't that what f7 is for? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 07:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:07:00.000Z","author":"The Mark of the Beast","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T07:07:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T05:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:26:00.000Z-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T07:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

WP:CSD#F7 actually does a pretty good job explaining what is eligible for deletion under F7. I'll answer specific questions, if you have any after reading the criteria. -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 07:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T07:26:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:26:00.000Z-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T07:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T18:54:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

Non-free images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag. That's why I chose f7. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T18:54:00.000Z","author":"The Mark of the Beast","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T18:54:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-04T07:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T18:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

That criterion only applies to blatantly mistagged files (e.g. a scan of a 2D work of art tagged with {{Non-free software screenshot}}). File:Single Trash.jpg was claimed to be an album cover and resembled an album cover closely enough. It did not meet the criterion for immediate deletion. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z-The_Mark_of_the_Beast-2012-01-04T18:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily, can you please indicate to me the discussion page corresponding to this deletion? I would like this article to be restaured, so as to correct the problems. Thanks in advance, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 12:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T12:17:00.000Z","author":"R\u00e9dacteur Tibet","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-R\u00e9dacteur_Tibet-2012-01-05T12:17:00.000Z-Mind_and_Life_Institute","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:00:00.000Z-R\u00e9dacteur_Tibet-2012-01-05T12:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:00:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:00:00.000Z-R\u00e9dacteur_Tibet-2012-01-05T12:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily,

You deleted the above file...I am a new user and I was not sure exactly what was required to display this image. I have an email from the editor of the newspaper giving the permission... I forwarded this to the address given by wikipedia but something went wrong somewhere... http://www.evangelical-times.org/copyright.php Could you let me know whether I need anything else? Andrewprowell (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC).__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T13:02:00.000Z","author":"Andrewprowell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andrewprowell-2012-01-05T13:02:00.000Z-http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/w\/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Front_Page_o","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:00:00.000Z-Andrewprowell-2012-01-05T13:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#F11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:00:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:00:00.000Z-Andrewprowell-2012-01-05T13:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily, Thank you for your comments on my talk page. May I also nominate IMDB (Internet Movie Database) as a reliable independent source of information, that listed Silent Life (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1099209/), while having also eligibility criteria ( https://resume.imdb.com/help/show_leaf?titleeligibility) protecting the source from the titles out of public interest. Can we base on this coverage as well to include Silent Life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MisterFirst (talk • contribs) 17:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T17:38:00.000Z","author":"MisterFirst","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MisterFirst-2012-01-05T17:38:00.000Z-Silent_Life_movie","replies":["c-Bwilkins-2012-01-05T20:47:00.000Z-MisterFirst-2012-01-05T17:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker) IMDB is user-editable, and thus is not typically considered a reliable source (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T20:47:00.000Z","author":"Bwilkins","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Bwilkins-2012-01-05T20:47:00.000Z-MisterFirst-2012-01-05T17:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

http://toolserver.org/~magnus/catscan_rewrite.php?categories=All+free+media%0D%0AAll+non-free+media&ns[6]=1&ext_image_data=1&doit=1

It would be nice if someone could clear what looks like a small backlog by appropriately tagging :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T20:24:00.000Z","author":"Sfan00 IMG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sfan00_IMG-2012-01-05T20:24:00.000Z-Intersect_of_Free\/Non-free_media","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z-Sfan00_IMG-2012-01-05T20:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

Alright, I'll see what I can do. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z-Sfan00_IMG-2012-01-05T20:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Noticed that "Espial" ^[1] was deleted - I have not seen the original text but would like to add an article on the Espial "TV Browser".

The Espial "TV Browser" is one of many TV Browsers very rapidly coming to market, very different than the Desktop, Mobile or Tablet browsers that are described in Wikipedia based on the unique interface requirements of the viewer (8ft+ more away, remote control), the constrained environments (Set top boxes, game consoles, Blue-ray players and TVs), and the requirement to be as good if not better than desktop browsers.

The Espial TV browser is based on Webkit, and today supports HTML5 more completely than many desktop browsers. Other TV browsers are based on Gecko.

Also noticed that the article "internet browser" only describes desktop and mobile browsers. Tablet browsers and TV Browsers should be added.

To understand the market for TV Browsers - Hulu, YouTube and other media aggregators are adopting TV browsers to display content on these devices, while ALL major TV manufacturers (Hitachi, Sony, Panasonic) are looking to integrate TV browsers on all their platforms to satisfy the need for media/web consumption via the TV screen.

Please advise on what is required to correct the content.

Thanks

Bmahony (talk) 20:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T20:39:00.000Z","author":"Bmahony","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bmahony-2012-01-05T20:39:00.000Z-\"Espial\"_deletion.","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:03:00.000Z-Bmahony-2012-01-05T20:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

Feel free to. You don't need to ask for my permission to create articles... -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:03:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:03:00.000Z-Bmahony-2012-01-05T20:39:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Fastily, I saw on WP:ADCO that you're willing to help editors who want to expand their knowledge of Files and Copyright. I don't know if full-fledged Admin Coaching is the right 'fit' for me, per se, given that I mainly deal with more gnomish issues and my content creation doesn't seem to be up to the level many RfA !voters expect, and I doubt it ever will be. However, I would very much like to help the project as much as I can. I can learn about Files and Copyrights and apply that information to the non-admin tasks involved with maintaining Files. Is that something that you'd have the time to show me the ropes regarding? Achowat (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T22:01:00.000Z","author":"Achowat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Achowat-2012-01-05T22:01:00.000Z-Media_Files_Instruction","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:20:00.000Z-Achowat-2012-01-05T22:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

If you're not planning on running for adminship, then yeah, my admin coaching program probably isn't right for you. How about this - I'll give you a few pages to read, which should give you a general understanding of media file policy (WP:IUP, WP:NFC, WP:NFCC, WP:DELETE, WP:ICT, WP:FUG, WP:PERMISSION). If you have any questions relating to policy or specific files, feel free to ask me. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:20:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:20:00.000Z-Achowat-2012-01-05T22:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. Why did you delete the page for actress Geraldine Hughes? She is clearly notable. She was the female lead in "Rocky Balboa", a film that grossed over $155 million. She also had a major role in "Grand Torino", along with several other TV and film roles. A Google search results in a massive number of hits. How can she not have achieved notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Atrocity Exhibit (talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T23:31:00.000Z","author":"The Atrocity Exhibit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Atrocity_Exhibit-2012-01-05T23:31:00.000Z-Geraldine_Hughes","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:26:00.000Z-The_Atrocity_Exhibit-2012-01-05T23:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#PROD -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:26:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:26:00.000Z-The_Atrocity_Exhibit-2012-01-05T23:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, I might have accidentally wrote the article in an advertising format, can kindly help to restore and I try to clean it up? Thanks. Zuff (talk) 02:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T02:39:00.000Z","author":"Zuff","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zuff-2012-01-06T02:39:00.000Z-Tanah_Merah_Ferry_Terminal","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:28:00.000Z-Zuff-2012-01-06T02:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

Go for it. Deleted text appended below. Click here to view it. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:28:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:28:00.000Z-Zuff-2012-01-06T02:39:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

May God bless you. 89.210.124.119 (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T05:24:00.000Z","author":"89.210.124.119","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-89.210.124.119-2012-01-06T05:24:00.000Z-Thanks_for_unleashing_me","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for being quick on the A10 speedy. I closed the now moot AFD. How do I redirect the deleted title as a reasonable search term to Treasure Island (2012 TV miniseries) without messing with the current tag that the errant article was A10'd? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T07:21:00.000Z","author":"MichaelQSchmidt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MichaelQSchmidt-2012-01-06T07:21:00.000Z-Question:","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:29:00.000Z-MichaelQSchmidt-2012-01-06T07:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Schmidt,"}}-->

I'm not sure what you mean by that. If you want to create a redirect at the title of the now deleted article, feel free to do so. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:29:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:29:00.000Z-MichaelQSchmidt-2012-01-06T07:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I think you deleted my userpage by mistake. I'm pretty sure I didn't tag it. I've been cleaning out my sandbox. Could you please restore it?Greg Bard (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T07:49:00.000Z","author":"Gregbard","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gregbard-2012-01-06T07:49:00.000Z-User:Gregbard","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T07:51:00.000Z-Gregbard-2012-01-06T07:49:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Greg\u00a0Bard"}}-->

 Restored Sorry about that. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T07:51:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T07:51:00.000Z-Gregbard-2012-01-06T07:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gregbard-2012-01-06T07:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-06T07:51:00.000Z"]}}-->

It's all right. Thanks for taking care of my deletion requests.Greg Bard (talk) 07:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T07:52:00.000Z","author":"Gregbard","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gregbard-2012-01-06T07:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-06T07:51:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Greg\u00a0Bard"}}-->

• I've noticed that lately you've speedily deleted articles that were at AfD but never actually closed the discussions: [6] [7] [8]. Just thought I'd let you know. ;) Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 08:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:25:00.000Z","author":"Erpert","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Erpert-2012-01-06T08:25:00.000Z-AfDs","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:30:00.000Z-Erpert-2012-01-06T08:25:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Who is this guy?"}}-->

Thanks for handling those. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:30:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:30:00.000Z-Erpert-2012-01-06T08:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,

I think you missed the other ones also nominated with File:WashingtonHuskieshelmet.png. Mtking ^(edits) 08:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z","author":"Mtking","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mtking-2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files\/2011_December_23#File:WashingtonHuskieshelmet.pn","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:38:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Mt"}}-->

Whoops. Deleted now. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:38:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:38:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-06T08:33:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

hi, I put the wiki bio page up for speedy deletion. Not 100% convinced yet if this user deserves a wiki bio, but have reconsidered deletion in favor of locking page, and reversion to an Accurate version.

Users: "81.83.157.57", "AMA2010", "2.49.216.202", and "TVNEWS11" appear to be created for the sole purpose of spreading misinformation about this person, erasing CITED information about the topic (ie: my research), and promoting a book and movie about the claims.

I've also contacted Admin C.Fred about this, who has edited the page in the past, requesting page protection and reversion. I tried to undo some of the fake user edits, but it got to be tedious, and i figure you admins can do it easier anyways. Thanks!

Trickietrickie (talk) 10:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T10:57:00.000Z","author":"Trickietrickie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trickietrickie-2012-01-06T10:57:00.000Z-rm_speedy_deletion_of_latif_yahia_page_in_favor_of_lock_request","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:02:00.000Z-Trickietrickie-2012-01-06T10:57:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:TVNEWS11 warned. If they continue to edit war, please report them to WP:AN3 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:02:00.000Z-Trickietrickie-2012-01-06T10:57:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Added a new refrenced, hyperlinked, factful and non-promotionful article. Please feel-free to edit for more detail. But Admins - please stop deleting as this article follows guidelines.

I mean it - this article was meeting guidelines and I will post again - leave it alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Articleperfector (talk • contribs) 21:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:56:00.000Z","author":"Articleperfector","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Articleperfector-2012-01-06T21:56:00.000Z-4Shared","replies":[]}}-->

I am an article writer and you refuse my article's without just cause. You are unfair and bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Articleperfector (talk • contribs) 23:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T23:05:00.000Z","author":"Articleperfector","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Articleperfector-2012-01-06T23:05:00.000Z-4Shared","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RussianLiberal (talk • contribs) 10:01, 4 January 2012‎ (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T10:01:00.000Z","author":"RussianLiberal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RussianLiberal-2012-01-04T10:01:00.000Z-Revengefor_vandalising_the_article","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:03:00.000Z-RussianLiberal-2012-01-04T10:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

Time stamp for archiving. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC) __DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:03:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:03:00.000Z-RussianLiberal-2012-01-04T10:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

...as requested in the TfD discussion. Buffs (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T18:22:00.000Z","author":"Buffs","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buffs-2012-01-05T18:22:00.000Z-Request_Userfy_Template:PD-Letters_Patent","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z-Buffs-2012-01-05T18:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done at User:Buffs/Template:PD-Letters Patent -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z-Buffs-2012-01-05T18:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Buffs-2012-01-06T17:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Bueno. Buffs (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T17:52:00.000Z","author":"Buffs","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Buffs-2012-01-06T17:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-06T08:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi You deleted File:Mobile payments model india.png under F3. Considering I created this image on my own, was the problem that I had chosen to upload it under a license that limited derivatives..etc.? Let me know what needs to be done to restore the image because it acts as a simple pictorial summary for a section of the article. Tanmaig (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC) Tanmaig(talk)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T11:55:00.000Z","author":"Tanmaig","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tanmaig-2012-01-06T11:55:00.000Z-File_(Image)_deleted","replies":["c-RichardOSmith-2012-01-06T14:59:00.000Z-Tanmaig-2012-01-06T11:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

I tagged this image for deletion because I believed it was a copyright violation (image extracted from a copyrighted document and presented as own work). The image description helpfully said where it came from, but now it is deleted I cannot see the source and recheck; if I got that wrong I apologise, and it should be restored. I subsequently also nominated File:Mobile growth india.svg and in this case I definitely was incorrect; the data - not image itself - was taken from a copyrighted document. I have removed the speedy tag from that one. RichardOSmith (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T14:59:00.000Z","author":"RichardOSmith","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-RichardOSmith-2012-01-06T14:59:00.000Z-Tanmaig-2012-01-06T11:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello,

My page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Samara got deleted due to allegedly being advertisement. I would like to know why was it considered advertisement and what makes it advertisement.

I am asking this again since i did not have a straight answer why the page is not acceptable. My intention is to correct it and resubmit it.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Bestler (talk • contribs) 14:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T14:37:00.000Z","author":"Pedro Bestler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pedro_Bestler-2012-01-06T14:37:00.000Z-http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tony_Samara","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:04:00.000Z-Pedro_Bestler-2012-01-06T14:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:04:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:04:00.000Z-Pedro_Bestler-2012-01-06T14:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I thought that you would be able to help rather than simply put what caused the deletion. I need to understand the cause for the deletion, not just a standard reply as that is not going to help. If you are not able to help please let me know of someone else that i can contact to help me understand how to create the same article in a different way so that i don't have to go through this process again. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro Bestler (talk • contribs) 11:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T11:16:00.000Z","author":"Pedro Bestler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pedro_Bestler-2012-01-07T11:16:00.000Z-http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tony_Samara","replies":[]}}-->

Just wondering what was on The Limited before you G6'd it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T20:08:00.000Z","author":"TenPoundHammer","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T20:08:00.000Z-The_Limited","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:07:00.000Z-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T20:08:00.000Z"]}}-->

Deleted text appended below. Click here to view it. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:07:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:07:00.000Z-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T20:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T23:04:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Could you please restore it to that? That G6 doesn't count, since it is not redundant to Limited Brands. The Limited is its own store. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T23:04:00.000Z","author":"TenPoundHammer","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T23:04:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-07T03:34:00.000Z-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T23:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hello, anyone home? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T03:34:00.000Z","author":"TenPoundHammer","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-07T03:34:00.000Z-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-06T23:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:40:00.000Z-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-07T03:34:00.000Z"]}}-->

Patience. You gave me less than four hours to reply. Even the business world does not run so quickly. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T03:40:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:40:00.000Z-TenPoundHammer-2012-01-07T03:34:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This image File:Tim Burton Image425.jpg is just a cropped version of this copyvio File:17566561-17566563-large.jpg you deleted. Can you either delete it or add the source info that I seem to remember was on the deleted image? ww2censor (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T20:56:00.000Z","author":"Ww2censor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ww2censor-2012-01-06T20:56:00.000Z-Copyvio","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:13:00.000Z-Ww2censor-2012-01-06T20:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

We can't use it anyways: the file is non-free and Tim Burton is still alive. Textbook violation of WP:NFCC#1. At any rate, this was the source. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:13:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:13:00.000Z-Ww2censor-2012-01-06T20:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily. Would you consider salting 4shared? its gone through an AfD with the result of delete and has been repeatedly recreated since. It seems that there is little chance that a viable version is going to be created. Just a thought. Best, Sparthorse (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:57:00.000Z","author":"Sparthorse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sparthorse-2012-01-06T21:57:00.000Z-4shared_2","replies":["c-Gaijin42-2012-01-06T22:01:00.000Z-Sparthorse-2012-01-06T21:57:00.000Z"]}}-->

Second the motion. Ive nominated it twice for speedy now, and it looks like its been created and deleted 5 times today. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T22:01:00.000Z","author":"Gaijin42","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Gaijin42-2012-01-06T22:01:00.000Z-Sparthorse-2012-01-06T21:57:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T22:18:00.000Z-Gaijin42-2012-01-06T22:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

I have left a waring for User:Articleperfector. If they recreate the article, we'll remedy this with blocks, not salting. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T22:18:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T22:18:00.000Z-Gaijin42-2012-01-06T22:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mind and Life Institute. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T22:40:00.000Z","author":"R\u00e9dacteur Tibet","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-R\u00e9dacteur_Tibet-2012-01-06T22:40:00.000Z-Deletion_review_for_Mind_and_Life_Institute","replies":["c-Edinburgh_Wanderer-2012-01-06T23:14:00.000Z-R\u00e9dacteur_Tibet-2012-01-06T22:40:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hi would you be able to userfy the page as per request at DRV thanks for your time. Edinburgh Wanderer 23:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T23:14:00.000Z","author":"Edinburgh Wanderer","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Edinburgh_Wanderer-2012-01-06T23:14:00.000Z-R\u00e9dacteur_Tibet-2012-01-06T22:40:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Edinburgh"}}-->

Why did you undelete the categories? I renamed them to use "files" instead of "images". — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T22:50:00.000Z","author":"Train2104","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Train2104-2012-01-06T22:50:00.000Z-Rescaled_fairuse_images","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily, This is Ryan, the Dakota Curling Club President, I believe the information on http://www.spiritus-temporis.com/dakota-curling-club/history.html was taken from wikipedia and not the other way around. For example, compare the information for the St. Paul Curling Club with that on spiritus-temporis. Likewise compare the Geographic information for St Paul with that on spiritus-temporis and you'll see that the spiritus temporis is nearly identical to parts of the wikipedia entry. In fact, spiritus temporis says they get their data from publicly available sources, probably including wikipedia. Please undelete our wikipedia page Dakota Curling Club entry. Thanks, Ryan DCCLeagueMgr (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z","author":"DCCLeagueMgr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z-Dakota_Curling_Club_part_2","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z-1"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G12 -FASTILY ^{Happy 2012!!} 04:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-05T04:33:00.000Z-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-04T18:31:00.000Z-1","replies":[]}}-->

I've read the G12 provision multiple times, but as I said, that other website (spiritus temporis) copied this content out of wikipedia. We (the Dakota Curling Club) wrote the original wikipeida article when we first opened the club. If anything, spiritus temporis is in violation of the Creative Commons license associated with wikipedia for not attributing their work. How do we get the original text and article back? DCCLeagueMgr (talk) 23:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T23:08:00.000Z","author":"DCCLeagueMgr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DCCLeagueMgr-2012-01-06T23:08:00.000Z-Dakota_Curling_Club_part_2","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Did you check the authorship of the page Category talk:A-Class Disability articles before deleting it because an author who had not edited it requested deletion under CSD G7? Did you read the notice I added to the cat page? Did you read the contested deletion section on the talk page? Please restore this, which is needed by WP Disability, or explain to me how a project is supposed responsibly to manage its classification categories. Thanks. --Mirokado (talk) 00:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T00:42:00.000Z","author":"Mirokado","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mirokado-2012-01-07T00:42:00.000Z-deleted_Category_talk:A-Class_Disability_articles","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:48:00.000Z-Mirokado-2012-01-07T00:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

You blanked the page on December 31st, 2011. In accordance with WP:CSD#G7, page blanks by the sole author of a page can be interpreted as a request for deletion by the author. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T00:48:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:48:00.000Z-Mirokado-2012-01-07T00:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mirokado-2012-01-07T01:01:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah, very sorry, you have just removed the talk page! I have spent most of the day worrying about someone trying to delete another article and "must have lost my presence of mind" (link for when you feel like relaxing and a laugh). Yes deleting the talk page was fine as I decided the project template is not helpful for mass-produced pages like that. I think next time I will add the deletion template myself instead of just blanking the page. Thanks and sorry again. --Mirokado (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T01:01:00.000Z","author":"Mirokado","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Mirokado-2012-01-07T01:01:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you! Have a good morning/afternoon/evening/night. fredgandt 02:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T02:25:00.000Z","author":"Fred Gandt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fred_Gandt-2012-01-07T02:25:00.000Z-Fast_by_name...Thanks","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T02:29:00.000Z-Fred_Gandt-2012-01-07T02:25:00.000Z"],"displayName":"fredgandt"}}-->

Sure thing. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T02:29:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T02:29:00.000Z-Fred_Gandt-2012-01-07T02:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Could you please undelete Muscat International Airport. There was a lot of info that has vanished, but I stand by to remove any copy vio material. Thanks, — Abhishek  ^Talk 03:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T03:24:00.000Z","author":"Abhishek191288","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Abhishek191288-2012-01-07T03:24:00.000Z-Undeletion","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:46:00.000Z-Abhishek191288-2012-01-07T03:24:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Abhishek"}}-->

I'm not allowed to userfy or restore copyright-violating material back to the mainspace. You might be able to find the deleted text on way back machine - [9]. Sorry, FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T03:46:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:46:00.000Z-Abhishek191288-2012-01-07T03:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Why did you delete an image that has a fair use rational with "lack of licencing" as the rationale. It's clearly copyrighted. Please restore it. File:Toronto International Airport and Airport Expressway, 1964.png -- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 03:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T03:38:00.000Z","author":"Floydian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Floydian-2012-01-07T03:38:00.000Z-Please_restore_this_and_dig_a_little_before_deleting","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:41:00.000Z-Floydian-2012-01-07T03:38:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u0284\u026do\u028f\u0257ia\u0272"}}-->

Because you didn't supply a license tag at upload. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T03:41:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:41:00.000Z-Floydian-2012-01-07T03:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Floydian-2012-01-07T14:41:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:41:00.000Z"]}}-->

Clearly, it is copyrighted. The licencing is obvious: copyright. Please restore it. Next time, use a human judgment instead of doing what a robot can do. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 14:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T14:41:00.000Z","author":"Floydian","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Floydian-2012-01-07T14:41:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T03:41:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"\u0284\u026do\u028f\u0257ia\u0272"}}-->

Hi,

You deleted the page I created "DirectFix". To be fair I ask that you either re-instate the page or go delete the following pages. If you look at the pages I created and compare it to iFixit you will notice we are the same type of company. I used very similar wording like their page because it is live and not deleted. Please look at their page and then look at mine and if you deleted mine then I ask you to delete theirs and also iResq. Here are the links.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IFixit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IResQ

Regards, Robert Stanley — Preceding unsigned comment added by AXMicro (talk • contribs) 04:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:03:00.000Z","author":"AXMicro","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AXMicro-2012-01-07T04:03:00.000Z-Deleted_DirectFix","replies":["c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:06:00.000Z-AXMicro-2012-01-07T04:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker)That is not considered a valid reason for an article, though.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:06:00.000Z","author":"Jasper Deng","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:06:00.000Z-AXMicro-2012-01-07T04:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gaijin42-2012-01-07T04:08:00.000Z-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker) I can't tell for sure because your page has been deleted, but those pages both have good references. Just copying their wording and content is not enough. you need to satisfy WP:Notability on your own. Gaijin42 (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:08:00.000Z","author":"Gaijin42","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gaijin42-2012-01-07T04:08:00.000Z-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:06:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Here is what we had on our page. We have great references go search us on the internet.........Again this is not fair... our info is just as valid as iFixit yet you are showing favoritism to them by deleting us and not them.

== References ==

== External links ==

== More Info ==

Well, with that you have just declared your conflict of interest. Also, accounts cannot represent groups of people. Please read and observe these guidelines when editing regarding DirectFix.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:23:00.000Z","author":"Jasper Deng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:23:00.000Z-Deleted_DirectFix","replies":[]}}-->

"accounts cannot represent groups of people." Again then you need to delete the page for "iFixit" and "iResq" as they also violate the same issue you have found with my page that I listed. Again if you are stating I am in violation then so are they. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AXMicro (talk • contribs) 04:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:30:00.000Z","author":"AXMicro","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AXMicro-2012-01-07T04:30:00.000Z-Deleted_DirectFix","replies":["c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:33:00.000Z-AXMicro-2012-01-07T04:30:00.000Z"]}}-->

(please stop making new sections for each of your comments) No, the same issue does not exist with those articles, and suggesting they be deleted because your article was deleted is not a valid reason for deletion.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:33:00.000Z","author":"Jasper Deng","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-07T04:33:00.000Z-AXMicro-2012-01-07T04:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey there Fastily, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fastily/TMI.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T05:01:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2012-01-07T05:01:00.000Z-Non-free_files_in_your_user_space_2","replies":[]}}-->

ALL the pages were deleted along with the erroneous page. It has significatn sourced content. Can we please restore the content from 2011 Bolivian prtests [10] per this [11](Lihaas (talk) 07:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)).__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T07:07:00.000Z","author":"Lihaas","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lihaas-2012-01-07T07:07:00.000Z-2011_Bolivian_protests","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T07:14:00.000Z-Lihaas-2012-01-07T07:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah, so that's what you wanted.  Done now. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T07:14:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T07:14:00.000Z-Lihaas-2012-01-07T07:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This editor is community banned from making new pages in their user space. It is listed on the edit restriction list.--Adam in MO Talk 08:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T08:49:00.000Z","author":"Adamfinmo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Adamfinmo-2012-01-07T08:49:00.000Z-Declined_speedy_in_Nmatavka's_user_space","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T08:53:00.000Z-Adamfinmo-2012-01-07T08:49:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Adam in MO"}}-->

My bad. Page deleted. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T08:53:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T08:53:00.000Z-Adamfinmo-2012-01-07T08:49:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Fastily. You have new messages at Arunsingh16's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. How did you do this? You just deleted my page without giving me 3days to explain my side. I felt like you have stepped on my ego as a page creator.!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JmKissme (talk • contribs) 14:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T14:44:00.000Z","author":"JmKissme","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JmKissme-2012-01-07T14:44:00.000Z-U-KISS_1st_Japan_Live_Tour","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:44:00.000Z-JmKissme-2012-01-07T14:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T04:44:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:44:00.000Z-JmKissme-2012-01-07T14:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This and associated pages have been speedily deleted incorrectly. I contested this as soon as I became aware of the issue but my following of 'due process' has been ignored. A simple look at the page history makes it obvious that after 100s of contributions this page does not deserve speedy deletion. How is this recified??Rjstott (talk) 20:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T20:59:00.000Z","author":"Rjstott","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rjstott-2012-01-06T20:59:00.000Z-Muscat_International_Airport","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:11:00.000Z-Rjstott-2012-01-06T20:59:00.000Z"]}}-->

[12]. Revise the body of the article as you had intended. Once you're done, I'll give you the deleted text of the infoboxes, categories, meta-templates, ect, so you can re-create the article. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T21:11:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-06T21:11:00.000Z-Rjstott-2012-01-06T20:59:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Sorry, this doesn't fix it at all. Nor do I or anyone else now have access to the original article to enable recovery on the non-copyvio text. I had no intention of changing it at all, I was just the original author. If there was just one sentence that showed copyvio then this was easily fixed with appropriate identification and edit. Rjstott (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T18:06:00.000Z","author":"Rjstott","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rjstott-2012-01-07T18:06:00.000Z-Muscat_International_Airport","replies":[]}}-->

Have found the text on a wiki mirror but can't spot the copyvio nor can I move the non-wikipedia material easily because of formatting issues. Any chance you can let me have the original wiki entry as a text file that I might re-engineer into the article which is already being re-written from scratchRjstott (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T18:15:00.000Z","author":"Rjstott","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rjstott-2012-01-07T18:15:00.000Z-Muscat_International_Airport","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, if you get a chance, the "Germany in 2011" article still needs merged into "2011 in Germany". I can do the merge if you are not interested in combining them. Thank you and happy new year. Fotaun (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T16:25:00.000Z","author":"Fotaun","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fotaun-2012-01-07T16:25:00.000Z-Needs_merger","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:45:00.000Z-Fotaun-2012-01-07T16:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

It wasn't done yet? My bad, restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T04:45:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:45:00.000Z-Fotaun-2012-01-07T16:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the quick response on the speedy delete requests. With The Wizard Trap, I think that's at least three spammy pages you've taken out shortly after I've marked them. Nick Number (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T18:52:00.000Z","author":"Nick Number","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nick_Number-2012-01-07T18:52:00.000Z-Vroom","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:46:00.000Z-Nick_Number-2012-01-07T18:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sure thing. Happy to have been able to help. Cheers, FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T04:46:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:46:00.000Z-Nick_Number-2012-01-07T18:52:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Are you sure you meant to delete User:Gourami Watcher? I couldn't see any tags on it, even though it was showing up at CAT:SD. Cheers SmartSE (talk) 00:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T00:47:00.000Z","author":"Smartse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Smartse-2012-01-08T00:47:00.000Z-User:Gourami_Watcher","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:47:00.000Z-Smartse-2012-01-08T00:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

I don't think so.  Restored. Thanks for letting me know. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T04:47:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:47:00.000Z-Smartse-2012-01-08T00:47:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Special:Contributions/203.59.158.166

You might as well unblock this or reduce it to a few hours, he's gone through 3 IPs since (as seen here), as these crappy Aussie ISPs are highly dynamic; SPI can't even rangeblock them due to collateral damage. Might as well not risk some poor shmuck getting blocked access within those 3 months, and it's doubtful George will get the IP again.. if you see the amount of one-off IP uses we've tagged as socks already, you'll know that's true enough. He just goes on bugging us daily, no one can do a thing about it really.. can be blocked, change IP just by reseting his modem, and back in 5 mins. Such is life. Ma®©usBritish ^[chat] 02:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T02:09:00.000Z","author":"MarcusBritish","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MarcusBritish-2012-01-08T02:09:00.000Z-Extensive_sock_block","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:48:00.000Z-MarcusBritish-2012-01-08T02:09:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Ma\u00ae\u00a9usBritish"}}-->

Reduced to a week. Hope that's better. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T04:48:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:48:00.000Z-MarcusBritish-2012-01-08T02:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Can you have a look at File:Ross School Logo.png, and restore the deleted history, as a text logo it is not eligible for copyright and therefore the FUR put on by the up loader was in error, if you agree and do restore the history I plan to tag it for moving to commons. Mtking ^(edits) 02:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T02:15:00.000Z","author":"Mtking","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mtking-2012-01-08T02:15:00.000Z-File:Ross_School_Logo.png","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:52:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-08T02:15:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Mt"}}-->

I had a look, and as far as I could tell, there was nothing that needed restoring, so I moved the file to Commons. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T04:52:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T04:52:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-08T02:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Admins can see deleted pages, right? Can you take a look here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Futures Studies and see if there's anything useful to restore? And an editor was particularly interested in who was the first/last active member in that project.

See: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/ForesightAndFuturesStudies. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 06:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:10:00.000Z","author":"Jeraphine Gryphon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:10:00.000Z-WP_Futures_revival","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:12:00.000Z-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:10:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Jeraphine\u00a0Gryphon"}}-->

While yes, I can view deleted pages, that will not allow me to determine who the first/last active member of that project was. Sorry, FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:12:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:12:00.000Z-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:19:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

I mean, isn't there a participants list or anything? The guys in the deletion discussion were referring to a certain active member. And besides that, if the project gets revived, is there anything useful to restore from the old page? — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 06:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:19:00.000Z","author":"Jeraphine Gryphon","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:19:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:22:00.000Z-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:19:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Jeraphine\u00a0Gryphon"}}-->

Only two members listed - User:Wendyinfutures and User:FayssalF. There was limited content on that page, which imo, would not be helpful at all if you're seeking to reboot the project. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:22:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:22:00.000Z-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:25:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

THANKYOU. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 06:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:25:00.000Z","author":"Jeraphine Gryphon","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Jeraphine_Gryphon-2012-01-08T06:25:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:22:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Jeraphine\u00a0Gryphon"}}-->

I created the article 'An End to the Means (novel)' but you speedily deleted it based on G12 as the reason. Please explain. Although CorenSearchBot correctly identified http://anendtothemeans.com as the source of the draft Wikipedia article content, procedures in article 'Wikipedia: Donating copyrighted materials' were subsequently followed. The webpage/blog for An End to the Means now contains a statement of release (http://anendtothemeans.com/statement-of-release/). I documented the release on the talk page of the article. Wikipedia did not offer a button 'Click here to contest this speedy deletion'. Request the article 'An End to the Means (novel)' be restored or an explanation/recommendations be provided to improve the article and republish. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DengXiuYuan (talk • contribs) 06:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:20:00.000Z","author":"DengXiuYuan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-08T06:20:00.000Z-Restoration_of_article_'An_End_to_the_Means_(novel)'","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:23:00.000Z-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-08T06:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

By "'Wikipedia: Donating copyrighted materials' were subsequently followed.", do you mean that you sent an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org in accordance with WP:PERMISSION? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:23:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T06:23:00.000Z-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-08T06:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I did not send an e-mail to permissions-en@wikimedia.org because, per the article 'Wikipedia: Donating copyrighted materials' it specifically states to write an e-mail ONLY if you want to allow Wikipedia to use content but DON'T want to put a license statement on the website. I put a statement of release on the website so therefore, did not think an e-mail was necessary. DengXiuYuan (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Hi Fastily, I never received an answer to the above question. Can you please provide an answer or restore the 'An End To the Means (novel)' article? Thank you very much!DengXiuYuan (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T06:29:00.000Z","author":"DengXiuYuan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-08T06:29:00.000Z-Restoration_of_article_'An_End_to_the_Means_(novel)'","replies":[]}}-->

Hello,
The page DHWANI CET was deleted by you by saying that it fall to (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). But DHWANI is most popular and largest social and cultural festival (started in 2001 -in 60^th anniversary of Starting of technical education in Kerala) in kerela which brings almost 50,000 students of different engineering collages across the state/country.Being hosted by College of Engineering, Trivandrum the prime Engineering institute in Kerala,DHWANI attracts people from different sections.

Please restore it and help me to avoid further deletion.

Abilngeorge (talk) 13:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T13:09:00.000Z","author":"Abilngeorge","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Abilngeorge-2012-01-08T13:09:00.000Z-DHWANI_CET","replies":["c-Bwilkins-2012-01-08T13:24:00.000Z-Abilngeorge-2012-01-08T13:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker) As the "article" had already failed WP:PROD, and an AFD is in process, I have restored. Unless the article is brought up to proper standards it will be deleted in a few days. Please read WP:DELETE and comment at the appropriate AFD discussion (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T13:24:00.000Z","author":"Bwilkins","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Bwilkins-2012-01-08T13:24:00.000Z-Abilngeorge-2012-01-08T13:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Do you think it would be possible to either

a) run Fbot task 4 daily at 23:00 UTC for the rest of the month; or

b) give me a copy of task 4 so that I can do it?

I'd like to have it run right before the daily stats are compiled for the drive. Thanks, Sven Manguard Wha? 23:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-06T23:41:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-06T23:41:00.000Z-Fbot_task_4","replies":[]}}-->

P.S. Thanks for the kind words re: the RfA.

I definitely am not able to run the bot daily. Presently, I run it once a week. I'll be happy to give you the program and let you run it, if you're able to secure BRFA approval. And you're most welcome! :) Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T00:53:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:53:00.000Z-Fbot_task_4","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T04:19:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

Here's the thing. It would be so much simpler if I had a copy of task 4, but then again, I could also make use of tasks 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 14, and 15 (and probably whatever else you come up with next). In order for me to be able to use any of them, I think you'd have to do some recoding, and I myself have about the same knowledge of javascript as your average squirrel does, so I can't help, or fix anything that goes wrong. For the once a month that I'd want anything run, it's just as easy to ask you to do it. There's no reason for me to ask you to spend hours coding me in, and then keeping me up to date when the code changes. If it were all on toolserver and I could stick in a password and click a button, it'd save me asking you, but none of your programs are built that way. Nevermind, I guess. Just please have task 4 run daily now, and during future drives. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T04:19:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T04:19:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T00:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-07T07:11:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T04:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

Again, I'm unable to run the bot daily. Believe it or not, it's not that difficult for me to code in a login function as described above, and I'd be happy to do that if you could secure BRFA approval for any of the above tasks. If you're planning on running the bot off the toolserver, I can also supply you with a bash script that will run the program indefinitely. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T07:11:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-07T07:11:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T04:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T13:36:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T07:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

Oh wow, misread... I did not see the "not" in "not able" there at all. Please code Svenbot in for task 4, I'll be filing a BRFA shortly. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T13:36:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T13:36:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-07T07:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T15:38:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T13:36:00.000Z"]}}-->

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Svenbot 2 has been speedy approved, so as soon as you have the code ready, I can start the run. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-07T15:38:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T15:38:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T13:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T22:56:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T15:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Just emailed you the download link. Be sure to download both files and be sure that they're not in your Downloads folder when you run them. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T22:56:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T22:56:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-07T15:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-08T23:53:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T22:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

I emailed you back. Now I understand why you can't run it daily. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T23:53:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-08T23:53:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T22:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there. Was just wondering what we do with this sort of thing? Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 07:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T07:22:00.000Z","author":"Basalisk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Basalisk-2012-01-08T07:22:00.000Z-Question","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:28:00.000Z-Basalisk-2012-01-08T07:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

Well, I guess a PROD would acceptable. AFAIK, we don't speedy articles for being in a foreign language. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:28:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:28:00.000Z-Basalisk-2012-01-08T07:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I notice that you have modified this template. I must congratulate you for that; nevertheless, would you alter the documentation for us, please? Everybody must know about this. I have recently notified the uploader about this. --George Ho (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T10:02:00.000Z","author":"George Ho","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-George_Ho-2012-01-08T10:02:00.000Z-Template:bsr","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:30:00.000Z-George_Ho-2012-01-08T10:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hm, I guess you're right. This isn't very accurate. I'll manually tag instead. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:30:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:30:00.000Z-George_Ho-2012-01-08T10:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• Thanks for doing this history-merge; but afterwards, please log it: see Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen#New requests. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T11:25:00.000Z","author":"Anthony Appleyard","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Anthony_Appleyard-2012-01-08T11:25:00.000Z-Leonard_Betts","replies":[]}}-->

Ah, right, my bad. Thanks for letting me know. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:30:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:30:00.000Z-Leonard_Betts","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily, apologies in advance if I'm missing something, but I wondered why you deleted Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force I believe it contained a list of all the editors signed up to the project. Another editor spotted it and raised the question here. Best Pol430 talk to me 13:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T13:14:00.000Z","author":"Pol430","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pol430-2012-01-08T13:14:00.000Z-Question_2","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:31:00.000Z-Pol430-2012-01-08T13:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

How strange. I could have sworn there was a {{Db-move}}/{{Db-g6}} tag on the page. Guess not :\ Sorry about that. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:31:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:31:00.000Z-Pol430-2012-01-08T13:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

It seems there was a reply that was lost in the shuffle due to not having the ticket number (ticket 2011052510001716) in the subject line. Didn't help that it was sent six months after the initial reply by OTRS. It regards this file so it may provide the requisite permission for restoration. – Adrignola talk 18:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T18:04:00.000Z","author":"Adrignola","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Adrignola-2012-01-08T18:04:00.000Z-File:Marcos_Portugal's_Marriage_of_Figaro,_Bampton_2010.jpg","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:34:00.000Z-Adrignola-2012-01-08T18:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

It certainly does provide the necessary permissions.  Restored -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:34:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:34:00.000Z-Adrignola-2012-01-08T18:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You deleted something still open at AFD claiming it was ‎ (G3: Vandalism). All information was verified by references found. If someone did something to vandalize the page, just check the history, and undo their vandal edit. Dream Focus 22:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T22:46:00.000Z","author":"Dream Focus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dream_Focus-2012-01-08T22:46:00.000Z-List_of_organizations_that_support_the_Stop_Online_Piracy_Act","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T22:48:00.000Z-Dream_Focus-2012-01-08T22:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Whoops. Would you mind re-opening the AfD? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T22:48:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T22:48:00.000Z-Dream_Focus-2012-01-08T22:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Fastily, I'm helping out checking into CCI reviews performed by Katarighe in light of this.

One I'm looking into is the deletion of Anastas nika (not Anastas Nika, which may be related, but is different).

You deleted, as a G12. When I look at the DD, I only see a couple of three word phrases. Neither the article nor the source are in English, so my lack of language skills is hampering me. Given the problems with Katarighe, we are double-checking many edits, including this one. Can you help shed light on why this is a G12?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T00:42:00.000Z","author":"Sphilbrick","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sphilbrick-2012-01-09T00:42:00.000Z-Katarighe_edit_review","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T00:44:00.000Z-Sphilbrick-2012-01-09T00:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

Undeleted. Definitely not a G12. Not sure what happened there :o -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T00:44:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T00:44:00.000Z-Sphilbrick-2012-01-09T00:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sphilbrick-2012-01-09T01:21:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T00:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for your prompt attention.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 01:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T01:21:00.000Z","author":"Sphilbrick","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sphilbrick-2012-01-09T01:21:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T00:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey Fastily, I closed the AFD discussion for Quizlet VS. as a non-admin closure. I hope you don't mind. -- Luke (Talk)

That's fine, thanks for handling that. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T07:09:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:09:00.000Z-WP:AFD","replies":[]}}-->

I notice that you readded a di-nosource tag to this image despite me leaving an explanation of why I'd removed it in the edit log. You then didn't even have the decency to inform me that you'd re-added it. I note that our deletion policy says that when there's disagreement over whether something meets a speedy criteria it's normal to start a discussion rather than re-add the tag. I have now started such a discussion. The description of F4 is overly vague and certainly doesn't describe a situation such as this. However in essence it's purpose is to make sure we can verify that we can legally use a file and as I say in this case we don't need source information to determine this, hence I don't think it's a F4. Feel free to comment at the discussion. Dpmuk (talk) 01:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T01:43:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T01:43:00.000Z-File:CongSpaceMedal.gif","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T01:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

Files, PD or not, must have a verifiable source indicated somewhere on their file description pages. At any rate, the intent was not to edit war with you. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T01:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T07:42:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z","c-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T08:01:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ahh, now if we're talking about being able to verify the 'accuracy' of an image rather than the 'source' of that image then I can see why having a source is useful but the tag you used specifically speaks about copyright concerns and as I explained I don't think there is any copyright concern. Given that the F4 criteria also talks about licenses it's clear it's intent is also copyright concerns not verifiability. To be honest I think F4 is badly wordly and, at best, only just supports the di-nousource tag at all.

At least in terms of articles we don't speedy delete because of lack of verifiability but we do for copyright problems. Given that the image is PD and that the intent of the speedy is about copyright concerns I'd suggest that a speedy tagging shouldn't occur even if strictly within policy, appealing to WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY and WP:IAR (although I am aware of the irony of these arguements when it comes to this image as it probably should be deleted for other reasons). This is why I started an FfD to thy to get wider input. An RfC on F4 may be a better way to go and I'll consider drafting one when I get some time. In short I still think a F4 speedy tag is not correct for this file, although I'd also have no problem with someone taking to FfD. Dpmuk (talk) 07:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T07:42:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T07:42:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

RfC started here. Dpmuk (talk) 08:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T08:01:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-09T08:01:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T07:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey there Fastily, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fastily/TMI.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T05:04:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2012-01-09T05:04:00.000Z-Non-free_files_in_your_user_space_3","replies":[]}}-->

lol, you deleted Talk:Shoukhrat Mitalipov before i could fix the copyright link to the correct one (which i'd noticed before it had finished tagging). - Happysailor ^(Talk) 07:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T07:53:00.000Z","author":"Happysailor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Happysailor-2012-01-09T07:53:00.000Z-Speedy_Gonzales","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T08:54:00.000Z-Happysailor-2012-01-09T07:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry about that. Would you like me to correct the link in the log? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T08:54:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T08:54:00.000Z-Happysailor-2012-01-09T07:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, i understand that I did not choose a license for the images. Which license should I choose as I am working on behalf of Steven Williams at the Chapel recording studios. The images are coming directly from the computer here and I believe the copyright would belong to to Steven Williams. How do I go about re-uploading the images? I have tried but wikipedia doesn't want to let me do so. I am a new assistant at the Chapel studios and new to editing wikipedia pages. How should I proceed?

Dan Lee Martin — Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenChapelWilliams (talk • contribs) 10:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T10:03:00.000Z","author":"StevenChapelWilliams","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-StevenChapelWilliams-2012-01-09T10:03:00.000Z-F4._Deleted_images","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T10:07:00.000Z-StevenChapelWilliams-2012-01-09T10:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

Please see WP:DCP and WP:PERMISSION. Read and follow the instructions there on sending an email to our OTRS team. Once you have done that, the files will be automatically restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T10:07:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T10:07:00.000Z-StevenChapelWilliams-2012-01-09T10:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I requested a postponement of deleting the article because I was getting copyright permission and rewriting it based on feedback from Sparthorse. Why did you have to delete it? Sparthorse was allowing me to try to rectify. I don't appreciate you deleting the page while I'm trying to edit. -[evanomics] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanomics (talk • contribs) 22:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T22:25:00.000Z","author":"Evanomics","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Evanomics-2012-01-09T22:25:00.000Z-why_did_you_delete_my_article","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:39:00.000Z-Evanomics-2012-01-09T22:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

Link the page in question, it's unclear what you're referring to. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T02:39:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:39:00.000Z-Evanomics-2012-01-09T22:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily,

Could you tell us please, why you are deleting everything regarding the game uDigits? This pictures has been made by us, and your article "F11: No evidence of permission for more than 7 days" does not make a sense. Please, contact us explain what do you see wrong with this article. Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
Igoris Vasiliauskas
Lead Designer at uDigits
uWaver Ltd
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chip Wolt (talk • contribs) 10:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T10:24:00.000Z","author":"Chip Wolt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chip_Wolt-2012-01-09T10:24:00.000Z-uDigits","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:40:00.000Z-Chip_Wolt-2012-01-09T10:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#F11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T02:40:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:40:00.000Z-Chip_Wolt-2012-01-09T10:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,

Please will you review your closure of Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_December_27#Template:Unbulleted_list. Though there were more keep !votes than otherwise, each was based on a technical misunderstanding; and each refuted with an explanation. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:17:00.000Z","author":"Pigsonthewing","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-08T20:17:00.000Z-Unbulleted_list","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:51:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-08T20:17:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Andy Mabbett"}}-->

Fair enough. Reclosed as delete. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-08T20:51:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:51:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-08T20:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T11:56:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:51:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T11:56:00.000Z","author":"Pigsonthewing","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T11:56:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-08T20:51:00.000Z","replies":["c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T11:56:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Andy Mabbett"}}-->

Andy did not refute every point. your original closure was correct. Frietjes (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T11:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T20:02:00.000Z-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z","c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T21:33:00.000Z-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

In that case, could you do me a favor and start a WP:DRV on this? I'm not sure what to think now :\ -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T20:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T20:02:00.000Z-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T20:43:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T20:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

sure, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 9#Template:Unbulleted list. Frietjes (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T20:43:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T20:43:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T20:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Nor did I claim to have done so; however, they were all refuted Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T21:33:00.000Z","author":"Pigsonthewing","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T21:33:00.000Z-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:50:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Andy Mabbett"}}-->

Please see Template talk:Foreign character -- PBS (talk) 00:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T00:33:00.000Z","author":"Philip Baird Shearer","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Philip_Baird_Shearer-2012-01-09T00:33:00.000Z-Template:Foreign_character","replies":["c-Smerus-2012-01-09T15:49:00.000Z-Philip_Baird_Shearer-2012-01-09T00:33:00.000Z"],"displayName":"PBS"}}-->

I assume the above relates to the comment I wanted to make, that although the decision was 'delete', the template(s) are still live - or have I missed a trick somewhere?--Smerus (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T15:49:00.000Z","author":"Smerus","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Smerus-2012-01-09T15:49:00.000Z-Philip_Baird_Shearer-2012-01-09T00:33:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

As I understand the process, you have nominated the Koch photograph for deletion in seven days (that is the effect of your categorisation, is it not?). Can you tell me why? I have (with the help of other editors) tried to fulfill all the necessary requirements, and I don;'t have any idea of why, once again, someone wants this photo off the article.Lexysexy (talk) 08:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T08:29:00.000Z","author":"Lexysexy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lexysexy-2012-01-09T08:29:00.000Z-Vickers_Victorias","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T08:55:00.000Z-Lexysexy-2012-01-09T08:29:00.000Z"]}}-->

Please link the file in question. It's unclear what you're referring to. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T08:55:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T08:55:00.000Z-Lexysexy-2012-01-09T08:29:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

File:216 Squadron RAF Vickers Victorias at Ismailia, Egypt, c1929 (A A Koch).jpg

I see that Graeme Bartlett has already intervened. Lexysexy (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T00:02:00.000Z","author":"Lexysexy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lexysexy-2012-01-10T00:02:00.000Z-Vickers_Victorias","replies":[]}}-->

I realize the page Kathleen Chandler was originally created by a banned user, but the topic was notable as a state representative. I was someone who edited and watched the page as well. There was a similar instance with Kathleen Clyde (Chandler's successor) being created by the same user, the page deleted on those grounds, and then restored. --JonRidinger (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T13:27:00.000Z","author":"JonRidinger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JonRidinger-2012-01-09T13:27:00.000Z-Kathleen_Chandler","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:45:00.000Z-JonRidinger-2012-01-09T13:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

Okay then.  Restored -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T18:45:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:45:00.000Z-JonRidinger-2012-01-09T13:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, is there a way to unlink all of the pages that link to an image before deleting it? Your recent deletion of the college helmet files pursuant to Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_31#File:Florida_Gators_football_helmet.gif (among others) has broken the infobox on every page that linked to them, which is a relatively large number. Cleaning up each one individually is a nontrivial effort, and since the file has been deleted, normal members like me can't be sure they've cleaned up every page that used to link to the image in question. It would just be much more helpful if you could unlink pages that use the pictures before deleting them.-Jhortman (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T15:39:00.000Z","author":"Jhortman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jhortman-2012-01-09T15:39:00.000Z-Recent_deletion_of_college_football_helmet_images","replies":["c-Jhortman-2012-01-09T17:16:00.000Z-Jhortman-2012-01-09T15:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

UPDATE: Ok, I see that I can still use the "What links here" link on the deleted pages, so I've tried to go and clean up some of the pages from the images that were already deleted. It's going to be a long process to get manually rid of all of these helmet pictures, though. There are certainly at least 100 of them, and even the least-used ones have at least 2 or more links per picture. It would be much more simple if there were a way to automate it. -Jhortman (talk) 17:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T17:16:00.000Z","author":"Jhortman","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jhortman-2012-01-09T17:16:00.000Z-Jhortman-2012-01-09T15:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z-Jhortman-2012-01-09T17:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

There is actually a bot that removes links to deleted images. Just wait a few days and the bot will get them all. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z-Jhortman-2012-01-09T17:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Jhortman-2012-01-09T20:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ok, thanks. -Jhortman (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T20:28:00.000Z","author":"Jhortman","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Jhortman-2012-01-09T20:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily, a permission to publish the following files File:Gold platet wire for satellites.png File:Tungsten wire GTP.png File:Headquarter GTPC Towanda.png was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org on December 16th 2011 by Mr. Denes Szechenyi, Head of group communications of Plansee Group. Was something wrong with the permission? Can you tell me how to upload the images again? Thank you in advance.

Best regards, Frank_Schramm Frank Schramm (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T15:55:00.000Z","author":"Frank Schramm","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Frank_Schramm-2012-01-09T15:55:00.000Z-Guy_who_doesn't_know_how_to_put_in_a_section_header","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z-Frank_Schramm-2012-01-09T15:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

As long as you followed the instructions at WP:DCP and WP:PERMISSION, there shouldn't be a problem. Once our OTRS team processes the emails you claim to have sent, the files will be automatically restored -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:46:00.000Z-Frank_Schramm-2012-01-09T15:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I'm puzzled by your closing statement for this template: (1) it's a template, not a file, (2) the concern raised by the nominator was that that plainlist works better. However, it has been pointed out that plainlist does not work in image captions, while unbulleted list does work. plainlist has less functionality, which means it cannot be used to replace unbulleted list in some cases. I also argued that by simply adding "class=plainlist" to unbulleted list, there would be no need to orphan it, saving tens of thousands of senseless edits. neither of these ideas points were addressed. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T16:29:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T16:29:00.000Z-Unbulleted_list_2","replies":["c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T19:02:00.000Z-Frietjes-2012-01-09T16:29:00.000Z"]}}-->

It's not clear when you refer to "plainlist" whether you mean the template, or class. {{Plainlist}} was always meant to replace, not duplicate, {{Unbulleted list}}. Another editors have an example, during the TfD, of how to use lists in image captions; which was the only issue you described in the TfD. Since there are only 3763 transclusions {{Unbulleted list}}, and many of those are through parent templates (as was explained in the TfD), we will not need "tens of thousands" of edits, which in any case would not be "senseless ", as we don't need two templates for the same thing.. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T19:02:00.000Z","author":"Pigsonthewing","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T19:02:00.000Z-Frietjes-2012-01-09T16:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:47:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T19:02:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Andy Mabbett"}}-->

you can simply add the plainlist class to "unbulleted list", and there would be no need to orphan the template. the unbulleted list template doesn't have the same restrictions as the "plainlist" template, and can be made to generate the exact same html markup. the syntax for "unbulleted list" is basically the same as "collapsible list", which means it can be be indented when nested inside another template (like an infobox). on the other hand, you cannot indent the internal contents of a plainlist. so, given these differences in input syntax, and the fact that the "plainlist" template cannot be used inside of image captions, I see no reason to get rid of a template which actually works in these cases. in other words, why not just fix unbulleted list? Frietjes (talk) 19:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T19:47:00.000Z","author":"Frietjes","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Frietjes-2012-01-09T19:47:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-09T19:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Had to tag some Paula Stewart files which have Commons move tags. Since they are questionable as PD, should I remove the Commons tags from them? Thanks, We hope (talk) 16:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T16:46:00.000Z","author":"We hope","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-We_hope-2012-01-09T16:46:00.000Z-Remove_Commons_move_tags?","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:50:00.000Z-We_hope-2012-01-09T16:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Certainly, please feel free to. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T18:50:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:50:00.000Z-We_hope-2012-01-09T16:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-We_hope-2012-01-09T18:51:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

Will do-thanks! We hope (talk) 18:51, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T18:51:00.000Z","author":"We hope","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-We_hope-2012-01-09T18:51:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily

In consultation with the tenor and artistic director, Laurence Dale, I was preparing an entry for him on Wikipedia. I can confirm that I hold the copyright for the texts jointly with Mr. Dale. I would be grateful if you would re-consider your decision to delete. I don't see how our proposed entry is any more 'advertisery' than, for example, the entry for Ian Bostridge or other opera directors and singers.

I would be most grateful for your comments. Thank you in advance for your time and trouble.

Brian Galliford — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fdarts (talk • contribs) 20:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T20:04:00.000Z","author":"Fdarts","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fdarts-2012-01-09T20:04:00.000Z-Laurence_Dale","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T20:07:00.000Z-Fdarts-2012-01-09T20:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T20:07:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T20:07:00.000Z-Fdarts-2012-01-09T20:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

No Fan Arts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loanathecat (talk • contribs) 23:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T23:44:00.000Z","author":"Loanathecat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Loanathecat-2012-01-09T23:44:00.000Z-Fan_Arts","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:37:00.000Z-Loanathecat-2012-01-09T23:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Excuse me? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T02:37:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:37:00.000Z-Loanathecat-2012-01-09T23:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily, Icreated the article 'An End to the Means (novel)' on Saturday, but you speedily deleted it based on G12 as the reason. Although CorenSearchBot correctly identified http://anendtothemeans.com as the source of the draft Wikipedia article content, procedures in article 'Wikipedia: Donating copyrighted materials' were subsequently followed. The webpage/blog for An End to the Means now contains a statement of release (http://anendtothemeans.com/statement-of-release/). I documented the release on the talk page of the article. Wikipedia did not offer a button 'Click here to contest this speedy deletion'. I did not send an e-mail to permissions-en@wikimedia.org because, per the article 'Wikipedia: Donating copyrighted materials' it specifically states to write an e-mail ONLY if you want to allow Wikipedia to use content but DON'T want to put a license statement on the website. I put a statement of release on the website so therefore, did not think an e-mail was necessary. Never received a response to the last bit. Request the article 'An End to the Means (novel)' be restored or an explanation/recommendations be provided on how to improve the article and republish. Thank you in advance; appreciate your help!DengXiuYuan (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T01:21:00.000Z","author":"DengXiuYuan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-10T01:21:00.000Z-Restoration_of_'An_End_to_the_Means_(novel)'_article","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:38:00.000Z-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-10T01:21:00.000Z"]}}-->

Fair enough. Page restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T02:38:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:38:00.000Z-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-10T01:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Awesome. Thank you very much Fastily! I greatly appreciate it.DengXiuYuan (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T03:37:00.000Z","author":"DengXiuYuan","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DengXiuYuan-2012-01-10T03:37:00.000Z-Restoration_of_'An_End_to_the_Means_(novel)'_article","replies":[]}}-->

I did not create the article, but I was in the process of providing an argument (see below) to the CSD on Chanking when it was deleted. Would you be able to restore it to the normal Afd process? Thanks! Location (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z","author":"Location","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z-Chanking","replies":["c-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z","c-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:15:00.000Z-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Keep. Various sources touch on the technique and it's importance to funk music: 1) "[ James Brown's 'Brand New Bag'] featured a brand new sound made by choking the guitar neck and strumming percussively to produce a sound Brown called 'chank'." [13] 2) Sound is evident in classic funk hits by James Brown.[14] [15]) 3) The sound derived from this method is attributed as a likely "genesis of reggae".[16][17] 4) Jimmy Nolen, in some sources referred to as "Jimmy 'Chank' Nolen", is credited with introducing the term to the musical vocabulary. 5) ""Despite the fact that Jimmy Nolen defined the guitar style which influenced decades of guitarists and funk groups to follow, including Earth Wind and Fire, Tower of Power, Chic, George Clinton, and more, his influence on other forms of contemporary popular music such as hip hop is often overlooked." and a escription of how the "chicken scratch" or "chanky" sound is made.[18] 6) John Scofield wrote a song entitled "Chank" as a tribute to Nolen.[19] 6) Reference to "chank guitars".[20] Location (talk) 06:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z","author":"Location","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:15:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:15:00.000Z-Location-2012-01-10T06:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Location-2012-01-10T06:16:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

Much obliged! Location (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:16:00.000Z","author":"Location","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Location-2012-01-10T06:16:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastly, Finally I have done some more work. is it already ok? Can u already accept it after so many months?? :) Thank you. Regards,--Pravdaverita (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T22:31:00.000Z","author":"Pravdaverita","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pravdaverita-2012-01-11T22:31:00.000Z-User:Pravdaverita\/Sonorama","replies":[]}}-->

The above image was deleted by you. This image was taken from the following site: http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/bio/132_mkatju.htm their is disclaimer at the very bottom of the page. The disclaimer says this in particular "All the contents of this Site are only for general information or use." The photograph is for general use and can be used without copyright infringement. Please restore the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitakshira (talk • contribs) 13:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T13:42:00.000Z","author":"Mitakshira","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mitakshira-2012-01-11T13:42:00.000Z-deletion_of_image_Justice_Markandey_Katju.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Uh, what licensing information was missing from this file? I thought I was pretty careful about including all that was needed. I got a bot notice [21] and added some more info just to be sure (that bot is extremely unhelpful btw). It would've been nice if you at least notified me before deleting the file.VolunteerMarek 00:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T00:39:00.000Z","author":"Volunteer Marek","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Volunteer_Marek-2012-01-10T00:39:00.000Z-Kelus.jpg","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:36:00.000Z-Volunteer_Marek-2012-01-10T00:39:00.000Z"],"displayName":"VolunteerMarek"}}-->

It's sufficient.  Restored -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T02:36:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:36:00.000Z-Volunteer_Marek-2012-01-10T00:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Volunteer_Marek-2012-01-10T21:16:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:36:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks.VolunteerMarek 21:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T21:16:00.000Z","author":"Volunteer Marek","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Volunteer_Marek-2012-01-10T21:16:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T02:36:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"VolunteerMarek"}}-->

I noticed you recently deleted Category talk:UConn Huskies. You might have missed {{G8-exempt}} on the page. This redirect has been maintained in order to preserve archive links to an RfC over the use of Connecticut versus UConn in the name of the categories for the University of Connecticut athletic teams. If you have no objection I will go ahead and restore the page. –Grondemar 03:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T03:55:00.000Z","author":"Grondemar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Grondemar-2012-01-10T03:55:00.000Z-Category_talk:UConn_Huskies","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:10:00.000Z-Grondemar-2012-01-10T03:55:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u2013"}}-->

I see. Restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:10:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:10:00.000Z-Grondemar-2012-01-10T03:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-Grondemar-2012-01-11T00:50:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks! –Grondemar 00:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T00:50:00.000Z","author":"Grondemar","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Grondemar-2012-01-11T00:50:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:10:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2013"}}-->

Hi Fastily,

First of all, thanks for doing all you do on Wikipedia. I've seen your name come up many times and you have been making great contributions to the project. I was surprised to see that you deleted File:Halperin.JPG; I was the only editor who commented in that discussion other than the nominator, and I argued against deletion. I understand that deletion discussions are not votes, but surely a closure that contradicts the sole comment in the discussion should be preceded by a response countering that comment. Any clarification about why this image was deleted despite the concerns I raised would be appreciated. More importantly, however, I recommend contributing to rather than closing single-comment discussions in the future when the sole comment recommends a different course of action than the one you believe to be correct. You've been doing great work in this area of Wikipedia, so I realize that you closed the discussion in good faith.

Neelix (talk) 04:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T04:58:00.000Z","author":"Neelix","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Neelix-2012-01-10T04:58:00.000Z-Halperin.JPG","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:12:00.000Z-Neelix-2012-01-10T04:58:00.000Z"]}}-->

Facepalm? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:12:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:12:00.000Z-Neelix-2012-01-10T04:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Neelix-2012-01-11T12:13:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks, Fastily! Neelix (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T12:13:00.000Z","author":"Neelix","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Neelix-2012-01-11T12:13:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T06:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 2#Template:Dab button

I do not understand why you closed an ongoing discussion nor why your felt there was consensus for deletion. But, in any case, I'm owed a template for blind tagging of disambiguation link and {{disambiguation needed}} does not qualify. — Dispenser 06:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T06:48:00.000Z","author":"Dispenser","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dispenser-2012-01-10T06:48:00.000Z-A_bit_hasty_in_close_discussion","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:09:00.000Z-Dispenser-2012-01-10T06:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

In closing the discussion, I found that the reasons to delete the template were more compelling than those to keep it. In other words, the strongest argument made the keep votes was that this was part of a trial and visually appealing. The delete votes stated that this was no longer useful to the project since the trial is mostly inactive and visually unappealing. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:09:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:09:00.000Z-Dispenser-2012-01-10T06:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dispenser-2012-01-10T22:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

So far the experiments have been small (~200 articles so far) to test basic workflow and functionality. And as I've reiterated several times and current consensus is that {{disambiguation needed}} is only used when a person has attempted to disambiguate the term and is unable to do so. Examples: "Was it reviewed in the US or UK edition of PlayStation Magazine?", "Is this the same John Smith?", or "Just which Lake City in the US?". Experts then can use a tool to find these issues in their WikiProject. That's of course screwed up if we have bot/blind taggers.

I can partially understand the visual objects, but the Germans think our templates/tags are grossly inappropriate (they're to attract editors, seriously) and no one has put forth a better way to distinguish it from the {{disambiguation needed}}. The current design fits into the visual theme of vector and in the future I'll be upgrading Dab solver to output a more WYSIWYGish interface, which will really helps with editing Tables. — Dispenser 22:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T22:28:00.000Z","author":"Dispenser","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dispenser-2012-01-10T22:28:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily -- Please kindly re-instate the page on Jennifer Su that you had deleted. I indeed exist and have been on Wikipedia for many years now. I moved house and my emails changed, so that is probably why I hadn't received any notice of pending deletion. Your prompt re-instating of Jennifer Su would be very much appreciated.

Thank you so much and wishing you a happy 2012 and upcoming Year of the Dragon.

Kind regards Jennifer

Jennifer Su Anchor, Summit TV and Sky News "The African Business Report" Presenter, 5 FM ("The Hollywood Report" on 5 FM Gareth Cliff Mornings) Presenter, SABC 3 (South African Broadcasting Corporation) www.jennifersu.com Twitter: jennifer_su Facebook official fan page: jen su Former News Anchor of Star News Asia, and RTHK Radio 3 in Hong Kong and also Thai TV Channel 11 Newsline in Bangkok, Thailand

Please feel free if you would like to request additional information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyanewsdesk (talk • contribs) 09:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T09:06:00.000Z","author":"Tonyanewsdesk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tonyanewsdesk-2012-01-10T09:06:00.000Z-Please_re-instate_the_Jennifer_Su_page","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:52:00.000Z-Tonyanewsdesk-2012-01-10T09:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#PROD -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:52:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:52:00.000Z-Tonyanewsdesk-2012-01-10T09:06:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Please will you put a copy of Template:Welcome to Wikipedia CoI, which you just deleted, in my user-space? cheers. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T11:41:00.000Z","author":"Pigsonthewing","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-10T11:41:00.000Z-Welcome_to_Wikipedia_CoI","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-10T11:41:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Andy Mabbett"}}-->

 Done at User:Pigsonthewing/Welcome to Wikipedia CoI. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z-Pigsonthewing-2012-01-10T11:41:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, you deleted "File:CIE logo jpg.jpg" because of reason F4. In your page you said I am welcome to upload again with license information, but wikipedia won't let me. I have permission to use this picture - there is no license on it. It is free to be used. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkurka (talk • contribs) 16:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T16:50:00.000Z","author":"Vkurka","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vkurka-2012-01-10T16:50:00.000Z-File:CIE_logo_jpg.jpg_deletion","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z-Vkurka-2012-01-10T16:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

Click here, fill out the necessary information, and check the box for "Ignore any warnings". -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z-Vkurka-2012-01-10T16:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ukexpat-2012-01-10T20:02:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

And see WP:IOWN for the process to communicate the permission to Wikipedia. – ukexpat (talk) 20:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T20:02:00.000Z","author":"Ukexpat","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ukexpat-2012-01-10T20:02:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily. You deleted this article, but G4 does not apply as the new version of the page was neither identical or unimproved compared to the previous one. Please restore and conduct another AFD if necessary, thanks. 94.9.69.145 (talk) 19:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:18:00.000Z","author":"94.9.69.145","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-94.9.69.145-2012-01-10T19:18:00.000Z-H\u00e5kon_Winther","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:56:00.000Z-94.9.69.145-2012-01-10T19:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

Would you consider starting a DRV? I'd like a few more opinions on this matter before I outright restore it. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:56:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:56:00.000Z-94.9.69.145-2012-01-10T19:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Ok, thanks.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Håkon Winther. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 94.9.69.145 (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T21:09:00.000Z","author":"94.9.69.145","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-94.9.69.145-2012-01-10T21:09:00.000Z-Deletion_review_for_H\u00e5kon_Winther","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the deletions of Title of new article here. Something in the coding of the templates on Talk:List of serial killers by country isn't playing nice with one or more of the scripts I have installed, so if I don't preview the page first, Title of new article here is created when I save rather than my edits being saved to that talk page - very odd. – ukexpat (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:41:00.000Z","author":"Ukexpat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ukexpat-2012-01-10T19:41:00.000Z-Speedy_deletions","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:58:00.000Z-Ukexpat-2012-01-10T19:41:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sure thing. If you can't figure out what's wrong with that script, I guess I'll have to keep deleting the page ;) -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:58:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:58:00.000Z-Ukexpat-2012-01-10T19:41:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Put up some images for the monuments of Dhar, in India, which you flagged. I took these myself and happy to have them shared without any restriction. Be a shame to loose them... could do the transfer to commons and other things that might be needed? I am taken up with work at the moment and don't have time to figure out the system, for which I'm very sorry. thanks. Zippymarmalade.

Could you link the files in question? It's unclear what you're referring to. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:58:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:58:00.000Z-Dhar,_India,_photographs","replies":[]}}-->

My page was deleted with the reason "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" Below is the content of my deleted page.

'Green Planet 4 Kids is an English-language magazine published annually by Regional Maple Leaf Communications Inc. It is illustrated by Canadian artist Bob Hahn and was first published in 2010. The magazine uses a dinosaur group of cartoon characters "The Eco Family" in the form of comic strips that humorously depicts different ideas that ordinary families can implement to live more environmentally friendly. There is an accompanying website greenplanet4kids.com.'

Please advice me which part of this content I should change so it does not sound promotional.

Here are some of the reasons why I think this page should be on the wikipedia (Please advice me if it should be listed in some other section. )

• 260,000 copies of the book were distributed last year alone (in 2011).
• Many schools across Canada use "Green planet for kids" as their co-curriculum material.
• Its accompanying website http://greenplanet4kids.com won families online magazine award http://www.familiesonlinemagazine.com/awardApril10.html.
• Its accompanying ipad app was among top five green apps (http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/gadgets-electronics/stories/five-green-apps-for-your-ipad)

Please let me know if you would like to learn more about this book, and I could send you a free copy of it.

Regards, Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick helps (talk • contribs) 22:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T22:26:00.000Z","author":"Nick helps","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nick_helps-2012-01-10T22:26:00.000Z-Green_Planet_4_Kids","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:53:00.000Z-Nick_helps-2012-01-10T22:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T02:53:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:53:00.000Z-Nick_helps-2012-01-10T22:26:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Quick thing: is there a way I can see the Jefferson Academy AZ article that got G11'd? I work on AZ school stuff (including most of the articles on the AZ high schools list), so it might be salvageable. They do have a high school component from what I read when I inserted the redlink. Raymie (t • c) 23:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T23:07:00.000Z","author":"Raymie","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Raymie-2012-01-10T23:07:00.000Z-Jefferson_Academy_AZ","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:56:00.000Z-Raymie-2012-01-10T23:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

Please link the page in question? Jefferson Academy AZ doesn't seem to have ever existed. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T02:56:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:56:00.000Z-Raymie-2012-01-10T23:07:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

On 6 January 2012 you deleted Muhammad Iqbal as "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.disna.us/LIFE_OF_IQBAL.html". On what basis did you come to that conclusion? Gimmetoo (talk) 02:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T02:45:00.000Z","author":"Gimmetoo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T02:45:00.000Z-Muhammad_Iqbal","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:58:00.000Z-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T02:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

Oh? Is it not a copyvio? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T02:58:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:58:00.000Z-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T02:45:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T03:31:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:58:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm wondering what evidence led you to the conclusion that it was. Gimmetoo (talk) 03:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T03:31:00.000Z","author":"Gimmetoo","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T03:31:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:58:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You probably want to get over to DRV and either explain what you were thinking rather persuasively, or withdraw your G4... Honestly, it looks to me like if you did look at diffs, you didn't scroll down far enough to see the paragraphs of additional, sourced content vs. the AfD'ed version. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 03:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T03:04:00.000Z","author":"Jclemens","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jclemens-2012-01-11T03:04:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Deletion_review\/Log\/2012_January_10#H.C3.A5kon_Winther","replies":[]}}-->

Could you undo you deletion of this file. The helmet is copyrighted and there will never be a free use alternative. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 03:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T03:12:00.000Z","author":"CRRaysHead90","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T03:12:00.000Z-File:Tampa_Bay_Buccaneers_helmet_rightface.png","replies":["c-Mtking-2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T03:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Fastily requested I reply here as I nominated the file. The issue is with the website(s) that creates all of these files, they use a template helmet file that is copyrighted to them which they do not release in a CC-BY-SA compatible way and then add a logo to it. As a picture of a helmet can be taken at any game and released CC-BY-SA and a FUR (if needed) made for the element of the image that comprises the logo the images as taken from the helmet websites are replaceable and we cant make a FUR for there use.(for more information see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png) Mtking ^(edits) 03:49, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z","author":"Mtking","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mtking-2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T03:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T06:40:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z","c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:16:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Mt"}}-->

You want us to compromise our ability to illustrate a helmet because you're worried that a helmet template which has been used for 6+ years without complaint you say violates WP:FUR? I think you should have discussed this matter with WP:NFL before you went around tagging the images. And if the template is your concern you should have looked for a free-use template alternative so we could have re-done this properly without compromising the integrity of the quality of the infoboxes. Sometimes you shouldn't go 'directly to speedy deletion and IFD. I think you have handled this wrong. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 06:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T06:40:00.000Z","author":"CRRaysHead90","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T06:40:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mtking-2012-01-11T06:53:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T06:40:00.000Z"]}}-->

The issue has been discussed in a number of locations and I have not gone "directly to speedy" as you put it:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Fair use football helmets in team infoboxes
• Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 28
• Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 29
• Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 30
• Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 31
• Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 1
• Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 January 2

at atleast one other editor although disagreeing with the outcome feels that I did a good job getting overwhelming consensus on the college football helmets question, I have made a number of suggestions as to how these can be replaced, one such example is at West Virginia Mountaineers football. Mtking ^(edits) 06:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T06:53:00.000Z","author":"Mtking","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Mtking-2012-01-11T06:53:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T06:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:04:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-11T06:53:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Mt"}}-->

I really wish you would quit using that LSU helmet discussion, it's not the end all be all on what happens with these images, it's the consensus for that helmet, if you want something to be applied wiki wide I would suggest you start a central discussion so the entire wiki can partake and we can formulate an actual game plan of how to either undo what you have started or find a way to correct the problem you have pointed out. You should not compromise the quality of the articles til then, but that is just my suggestion. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 07:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T07:04:00.000Z","author":"CRRaysHead90","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:04:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-11T06:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mtking-2012-01-11T07:11:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

Well the issue is the helmet template is one that is copyright, WP:NFCC says non-free can only be used when a free alternative can not be sourced or created, and a free alternative can be created so we cant use non-free. Have a chat with User:Moonriddengirl the WP copyright expert if you want more detail. Mtking ^(edits) 07:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T07:11:00.000Z","author":"Mtking","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Mtking-2012-01-11T07:11:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:04:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Mt"}}-->

BTW, I keep seeing you say the helmet templates are copyrighted but I have yet to see you provide the evidence to prove it. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 07:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T07:16:00.000Z","author":"CRRaysHead90","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:16:00.000Z-Mtking-2012-01-11T03:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mtking-2012-01-11T07:51:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

I think that comment shows that you don't understand copyright, you might find WP:COPYOTHERS helpful to explain. Mtking ^(edits) 07:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T07:51:00.000Z","author":"Mtking","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Mtking-2012-01-11T07:51:00.000Z-CRRaysHead90-2012-01-11T07:16:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Mt"}}-->

The rule of Communist Aesthetics was a synthesized concept brought up by my a professor of mine in a history/psychology class. He uses it repeatedly and when other teachers were queried concerning it, they stated roughly the same thing as he. Although it is not readily known within most online communities, it is real. It has been used on my campus (University of Michigan) for many years. I hope that you can see through what may seem like humor in it and leave it be in the case that other students (or others) may use this site as a resource for the unusual rule of Communist Aesthetics. Magnetictanthor (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T05:10:00.000Z","author":"Magnetictanthor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Magnetictanthor-2012-01-11T05:10:00.000Z-deletion_of_page:_The_rule_of_Communist_Aesthetics","replies":["c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-11T05:12:00.000Z-Magnetictanthor-2012-01-11T05:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker)Usage within only a class is not sufficient for verifiability.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T05:12:00.000Z","author":"Jasper Deng","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jasper_Deng-2012-01-11T05:12:00.000Z-Magnetictanthor-2012-01-11T05:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Would you stop being so efficient. I just laid out the reasons for deletion on the talk page and you already deleted it. My gosh. Would you start doing a horrible, crappy job.  :) Bgwhite (talk) 06:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T06:19:00.000Z","author":"Bgwhite","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bgwhite-2012-01-11T06:19:00.000Z-Dale_S","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T07:21:00.000Z-Bgwhite-2012-01-11T06:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hehe, maybe if I had a bot flag, I would :) Cheers, FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T07:21:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T07:21:00.000Z-Bgwhite-2012-01-11T06:19:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I stopped watching the largely inane discussion about deleting {{foreignchar}} some time ago, so I have only just discovered that the final decision was to delete. However, I can't see that much reasoning was given by the closing admin. Since the issue is evidently quite contentious, and there were (arguably) strong arguments on both sides, I was hoping you could give some guidance on how you weighed up the arguments in reaching your conclusion. I am particularly worried, since there were a large number of people who had evidently gravely misunderstood the purpose of the template. --Stemonitis (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T17:03:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-09T17:03:00.000Z-{{Foreignchar}}","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-09T17:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

Well, there's really not that much to say. After reading the debate, weighing arguments against each other, and taking into account the number of valid keep/delete votes, I felt that there was a consensus in favor of deleting the page -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-09T17:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Stemonitis-2012-01-09T19:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","c-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T08:12:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","c-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T20:46:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","c-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:24:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","c-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","c-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:54:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

It was that weighing up that I was really asking about. (I trust you didn't make the mistake of treating it as a vote.) How did you decide which arguments held the greatest weight? Which were they? Which did you discount, and why? --Stemonitis (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-09T19:18:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-09T19:18:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Could you please answer my question? That would be more appropriate than simply ignoring my reasonable requests, and deleting the templates anyway. In simple vote-counting terms the debate may have seemed clear, but there was so much misinformation and misunderstanding that that approach is entirely untenable. You must have weighed up the arguments in some manner, and it would be the responsible course of action, in the interests of transparency, to publish the course of your deliberation. Please give a full explanation of your actions before carrying on with this course of action, for which I can see no real community backing. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T08:12:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T08:12:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T20:03:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T08:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Have patience. I have a big talk page, and it moves quickly. I won't guarantee a timely response, but I will guarantee a response. Let's make this easier for both of us. Tell me, using arguments presented only in the debate, why the !votes to keep are superior to the !votes to delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T20:03:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T20:03:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T08:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I'm not necessarily saying that they are. At the moment, I just want to know how you came to your decision, since you gave no indication when closing the debate. Any anyway, I thought such debates were meant to be about the arguments presented; you can't call them "!votes" (literally, not votes) and then rely on simply counting them to determine the outcome. Indeed, WP:DPAFD explicitly states that such "processes are not decided through a head count" (not my emphasis). Everything you have written so far suggests you were simply totting up votes and following majority rule, with no thought for the strength of argument on either side, which is something of a concern. I don't mind being patient, provided there is some hope of interaction, but you deleted one instance of the template while I was trying to engage you in discussion, and the other template is being actively orphaned as we speak. The only way this can move forward is if you explain your thinking in closing the deletion debate, as you should have done at the time, and frankly, the sooner the better. --Stemonitis (talk) 20:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T20:46:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T20:46:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:10:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T20:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Er, I believe I asked you to explain to me how the arguments of the !keep votes in the discussion were superior to the !votes to delete the templates? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:10:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:10:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-10T20:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

It is not a vote. All the guidelines say so, and I have re-iterated it. When closing a discussion, you do not count heads. You must instead weigh up the arguments. Since you evidently have not done so, I strongly recommend that you go back and un-close the discussion to allow someone who is prepared to do it competently to do so. Your actions in this matter have been disgraceful. You have made an error, and you have compounded it by being uncommunicative, and by pressing ahead with further deletions despite the fact that you know the actions are contested. My requests are not unreasonable and your inability to comply with them would seem to undermine your position as a TfD closing admin; you don't appear to understand the basic precepts of the position. Anyone who treats TfD discussions as a vote is not an appropriate person to close a TfD discussion. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:24:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:24:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:41:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

I thought we were having a collegial discussion here but apparently that was not the case. Go start a DRV. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:41:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:41:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Having failed to get any useful input from yourself here, I have had no choice but to list the template for deletion review. A good admin should always be able to justify his/her actions, which you have been unable to do. The burden of proof does not lie with me to explain why you were wrong, but with you to explain why you were right. Indeed, you should have given that explanation when closing the debate in the first place. I fear the deletion review may end up making you look bad, and it is with regret that I launch the process, but you left me no real choice. Possibly the worst aspect of this débacle was your continuing with deletion despite my concerns; this isn't something I would take action on, but is something you should understand and which I place here for the public record, and it is something that you should think very carefully about should you continue to act as the closing admin in any discussion. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:47:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Bullshit. I only told you to start a DRV due to your poor attitude and rude, immature behavior. If you honestly think you can have my assistance by being a dick, you are sorely mistaken. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:47:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:47:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your personal attacks help me to not feel bad about this, so thanks for that. And as it happens, I had already given up expecting any help from you, as I think I stated above. That is why I started the deletion review (and before your suggestion, incidentally). I also don't think your response here is an appropriate response to criticism for an admin, but that's a separate issue, and as I say, not one I want to get into. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:54:00.000Z","author":"Stemonitis","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:54:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-09T18:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:57:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

That makes no sense at all; there was never anything to feel bad about in the first place >.> At any rate, if that's your best retort, I need not say another word. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:57, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:57:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:57:00.000Z-Stemonitis-2012-01-12T07:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

If anyone is interested, here is the DRV → Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 12. Jared Preston (talk) 08:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T08:21:00.000Z","author":"Jared Preston","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jared_Preston-2012-01-12T08:21:00.000Z-{{Foreignchar}}","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily,

I was a little surprised that there wasn't any discussion before deletion at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_January_2#File:AnimatedTyping_by_Scanning.gif - thought I was in the right place to ask questions :( I'm happy not to contest the deletion; I've got very little experience in such matters, but could you give me some pointers to how I would go about asking questions or starting a discussion in future? I'd like to not be caught out again... Failedwizard (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T09:01:00.000Z","author":"Failedwizard","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T09:01:00.000Z-Um..._hi_(yes,_it's_about_a_deletion)","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:51:00.000Z-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T09:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

The file was a copyright violation (copyrighted Windows content was adapted to create this work), so I'm afraid that in any event, it cannot be restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T19:51:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:51:00.000Z-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T09:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T23:13:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:51:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry - I didn't put that very well... I've got no problems with the deletion, I utterly accept the fact - I'm just wondering how I would go about starting a conversation if it happens again with an image that I think should be kept? Failedwizard (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T23:13:00.000Z","author":"Failedwizard","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T23:13:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-10T19:51:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:08:00.000Z-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T23:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

Check out Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process. That explains the deletion process and !vote system we use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:08:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:08:00.000Z-Failedwizard-2012-01-10T23:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey there Fastily, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Fastily/TMI.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T05:02:00.000Z","author":"DASHBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DASHBot-2012-01-11T05:02:00.000Z-Non-free_files_in_your_user_space_4","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-11T18:27:00.000Z-DASHBot-2012-01-11T05:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

What the heck is this Fastily? I see this message all the time, and never know if I should revert the bot because you have some sort of purpose for "TMI" or what. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:27, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T18:27:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-11T18:27:00.000Z-DASHBot-2012-01-11T05:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:45:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-11T18:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

That page is the result of semi-automated dumps generated from files image-linked to expired PRODs that I delete. In my experience, files linked to expired PRODs often have a host of problems and tend to be FfD/PUF/DR material. It's fine if DASHBot is removing non-free files, because that means that the files are linked to the mainspace or tagged with {{subst:orfud}} -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:45:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:45:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-11T18:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Fastily. I see that you deleted Zanran under CSD G4 (recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion). However, the author of the article has been posting on my talk page about this, saying, amongst other things, that the article is substantially different from that discussed at AfD, and, having looked at both, I agree. My inclination is to restore the article, and let it be taken to another AfD if necessary. Perhaps you would like to look back at it and let me know what you think. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T10:15:00.000Z","author":"JamesBWatson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JamesBWatson-2012-01-11T10:15:00.000Z-Zanran","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:46:00.000Z-JamesBWatson-2012-01-11T10:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

That's reasonable, I agree. Would you like to do the honors? Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:46:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:46:00.000Z-JamesBWatson-2012-01-11T10:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-JamesBWatson-2012-01-12T11:55:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done Thanks. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T11:55:00.000Z","author":"JamesBWatson","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JamesBWatson-2012-01-12T11:55:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, perhaps is time to indefinitly protect Amanda Lindhout new editing conflict going on now between users. And the article has been protected so many times without improvements in behaviour from users overall.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T16:06:00.000Z","author":"BabbaQ","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BabbaQ-2012-01-11T16:06:00.000Z-Hi_2","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:48:00.000Z-BabbaQ-2012-01-11T16:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've just warned Twafotfs for edit-warring. If he continues to edit war, let me know and I'll block -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:48:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:48:00.000Z-BabbaQ-2012-01-11T16:06:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

could you take care of the transclusions listed here per WP:CSD#G8, as I stated in WP:TFD/H? 198.102.153.2 (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T16:10:00.000Z","author":"198.102.153.2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-198.102.153.2-2012-01-11T16:10:00.000Z-clean_up","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:49:00.000Z-198.102.153.2-2012-01-11T16:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:49, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:49:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:49:00.000Z-198.102.153.2-2012-01-11T16:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, Fastily. Just wanted to let you know that, following a question at my talk page, I've pulled up the history of this article and tucked it elsewhere pending a full investigation of copyright concerns. The tagger evidently didn't realize that there was clean content in the history, or I'm sure he would have listed it at WP:CP rather than tagging it for {{Db-g12}}. Some people at the talk page think it may be a reverse infringement, I gather, but I have no opinion on that yet myself. When I have a little more time, I'll do the digging and see what I can find out and what might be salvageable from earlier edits. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T17:38:00.000Z","author":"Moonriddengirl","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-11T17:38:00.000Z-Muhammad_Iqbal_2","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:50:00.000Z-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-11T17:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah, yes, that's definitely fine by me. Thank you for looking into it. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. Best, FASTILY ^(TALK) 20:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:50:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:50:00.000Z-Moonriddengirl-2012-01-11T17:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T20:54:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

You could start by telling us what information you used to come to the conclusion that the wiki article was copied from disna.us, as I asked before. That would make things a lot easier. On the other hand, if you didn't investigate prior to deletion, then saying so would also be helpful. Gimmetoo (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:54:00.000Z","author":"Gimmetoo","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gimmetoo-2012-01-11T20:54:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T20:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

As you have failed to respond, my working hypothesis is that you did not investigate the article prior to deletion. Even if the article were shown to have copyright violations at this point, your failure to investigate, and failure to respond to inquiries, raise serious concerns. Given the numerous similar complaints you've received in the past, I believe your actions display a pattern of misuse of an administrative tool. This is your last chance to reform. Gimmetoo (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T11:25:00.000Z","author":"Gimmetoo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gimmetoo-2012-01-12T11:25:00.000Z-Muhammad_Iqbal_2","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily. You said that this was "housekeeping and non-controversial"

I am fervently opposing the deletion. Did you read the edit summaries? The talk page? This is not a non-controversial deletion.

I am requesting the following: 1. Restoration 2. Listing in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 20:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T20:59:00.000Z","author":"WhisperToMe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-WhisperToMe-2012-01-11T20:59:00.000Z-Nortwest_Airways","replies":[]}}-->

Since that was not a "non-controversial" deletion I started a Redirects for discussion Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_11#Wikipedia:Nortwest_Airways WhisperToMe (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T21:42:00.000Z","author":"WhisperToMe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-WhisperToMe-2012-01-11T21:42:00.000Z-Nortwest_Airways","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T22:00:00.000Z-WhisperToMe-2012-01-11T21:42:00.000Z"]}}-->

Er, okay? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T22:00:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T22:00:00.000Z-WhisperToMe-2012-01-11T21:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-WhisperToMe-2012-01-12T00:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T22:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T00:52:00.000Z","author":"WhisperToMe","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-WhisperToMe-2012-01-12T00:52:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T22:00:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Did you really mean to delete the kidman talk page ?Gaijin42 (talk) 22:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T22:05:00.000Z","author":"Gaijin42","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gaijin42-2012-01-11T22:05:00.000Z-nicole_kidman","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T22:11:00.000Z-Gaijin42-2012-01-11T22:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

No, I believe I meant to delete this one -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T22:11:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T22:11:00.000Z-Gaijin42-2012-01-11T22:05:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You deleted P.L.U.C.k. now how am I going to find out what it stands for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.226.140 (talk) 01:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T01:16:00.000Z","author":"67.61.226.140","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-67.61.226.140-2012-01-12T01:16:00.000Z-Hey.","replies":[]}}-->

Did you look at the talk page of this file prior to deleting it? File talk:HaydenAZ.jpg -- You certainly didn't reply. Copyright owner (the heir) gave proper permission at Flickr. Please restore promptly, and don't jump the gun next time! --Pete Tillman (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T01:44:00.000Z","author":"Tillman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tillman-2012-01-12T01:44:00.000Z-Please_restore_File:HaydenAZ.jpg","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T02:50:00.000Z-Tillman-2012-01-12T01:44:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pete Tillman"}}-->

Yup. The file is not only eligible for deletion under WP:CSD#F11 but also WP:CSD#F3. Do your reading before making frivolous claims. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T02:50:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T02:50:00.000Z-Tillman-2012-01-12T01:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-Tillman-2012-01-12T03:01:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-12T02:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

Did you read the talk page? Do you really want a formal complaint? --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T03:01:00.000Z","author":"Tillman","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Tillman-2012-01-12T03:01:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-12T02:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T03:10:00.000Z-Tillman-2012-01-12T03:01:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pete Tillman"}}-->

If you honestly think that you can have my assistance by being a douchebag, you can gtfo. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T03:10:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T03:10:00.000Z-Tillman-2012-01-12T03:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

By doing research on above topic I obviously wanted to see what does Wikipedia have about it, and I found out you deleted the page as a hoax. I did not create the page, nor I know how to do it. But being from Yugoslavia, and not remembering anything about 'our' space program from my childhood, I wanted to research the topic, after learning about a Slovenian documentary scheduled to release next Spring about that issue (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfJiNPZ38kY). It discusses work of Slovenian rocket scientist Herman Potocnik. I admit I am skeptical about the hypothesis that Tito 'sold' rocket science to Kennedy, and that Verner von Braun built his work on Potocnik's blueprints, but I believe Wikipedia should perhaps have some information about the topic and the film project.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.148.51 (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T02:25:00.000Z","author":"24.91.148.51","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-24.91.148.51-2012-01-12T02:25:00.000Z-Yugoslav_Space_Program","replies":[]}}--> 

What you fail to consider with deleting this page is that while the U.S.A. launched the Apollo program in 1960, this does not mean that negotiations for the Yugoslav data did not begin in 1960. The Talks with the CIA could very well have occurred within the timeframe. I would suggest reinstating the page, however stating that the information has a lack of sources that are YET TO BE RELEASED in the "houston, we have a problem" documentary. Once this documentary is released, you could choose to delete it or not. However, until then, you have no justifiable cause or reason to delete the page.

I received correspondence today saying that you had deleted an image of a worker at the Trinidad Regional Virus Laboratory in 1956 because there was supposedly insufficient data giving permission to use it. As you can see from the correspondence (below) I had already written showing that I did indeed have permission to use it but does not seem to have been taken into account. So, unless you have other reasons (in which case please leave me a note on my Talk Page or email me), would you please reinstate the image? Here is the correspondence giving the data which shows I had permission to use it from the copyright holder - Mr. Paul Greenhall of the Smithsonian Institute. Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T02:53:00.000Z","author":"John Hill","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-John_Hill-2012-01-12T02:53:00.000Z-Please_reinstate_image","replies":[]}}-->

Dear John Hill,

Thank you for your email. Our response follows your message.

12/17/2011 01:32 - John Hill wrote:

> Dear Sir or Madam: > > Apparently User:Ronhjones feels there is some copyright problem with the image File:Greenhall Crawford 1956.jpg. On the image page is a copy of a letter sent to me by Mr. Paul Greenhall, son of Arthur Greenhall who took the picture, who inherited the photo when his Dad died. Paul Greenhall is also the Director of the Greenhall’s Trust – WI and a close friend of mine since we grew up together in Trinidad in the 1950’s and I worked with his father as an assistant (along with Mr. Crawford illustrated in the photo) doing research on rabies there. I wrote to Paul at the time (2007) and he sent me the letter which, as I mentioned is on the file’s page, which gave me permission to “use, reproduce and or duplicate as needed any image that Paul Greenhall provides. If the images are used, the desired citation is: Courtesy of the Greenhall’s Trust – WI. > > This, to me, would seem to satisfy Wikipedia’s requirements. If not – please email Mr. Paul Greenhall at popenstor@aol.com and ask him personally. He is the Curator of Molluscs at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C. I would prefer you do this for 2 reasons: 1. I don’t want to bother him again over a matter he thought he had dealt with sufficiently and I know he is extremely busy. 2. I am sick and bedridden and in constant pain and trying to cope with family and friends over Christmas.So, I would appreciate any help you can give on this matter. > > However, if you can’t do this I will write to him again – but it would have to wait until sometime in January. Please let me know if this is OK and/or if you need me to write to Paul again. > > I have pasted in a copy of his original email giving permission below (which you can also find on the file page. > > Best wishes to everyone at the Wikipedia for the New Year and apologies for not contributing that much recently – I just haven’t been well enough. I really support Wikipedia and its aims and I do appreciate the care that is taken to make sure everything is legit. > > Sincerely, > > John Hill > Cooktown, Australia. > .......................................................................................................

> > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: GREENHAL@si.edu > To: popstentor@aol.com > Sent: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 7:05 AM > Subject: Images for John Hill Australia" > > The photo shows Mr. Crawford who was Arthur Greenhall's Senior Assistant and close friend. John Hill 03:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) > > "John Hill has permission from the Greenhall Family to use, reproduce and or duplicate as needed any image that Paul Greenhall provides. If the images are used, the desired citation is: > Courtesy of the Greenhall's Trust – WI”__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-02-20T03:03:00.000Z","author":"John Hill","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-John_Hill-2007-02-20T03:03:00.000Z-Please_reinstate_image","replies":[]}}-->

Unfortunately the image has already been deleted by the community.

If you would like to know why this material was deleted or how to review this decision, please consult the deletion log at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/delete> and enter the title of the article in the Title field. This will provide details of the user who deleted the article as well as the reason. You can contact the user who deleted the article for further information by clicking the link "talk" after that user's name.

You may also wish to read <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_first_article> for tips on how to write an article that will likely not be deleted.

Yours sincerely, Sarah Stierch

-- Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org --- Disclaimer: all mail to this address is answered by volunteers, and responses are not to be considered an official statement of the Wikimedia Foundation. For official correspondence, please contact the Wikimedia Foundation by certified mail at the address listed on http://www.wikimediafoundation.org ...............................................................................

Whoever gave you permission to use the file on Wikipedia also needs to specify a license for the file to be released under, and a new email with that information needs to be forwarded to OTRS. Until then, the file cannot be restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:57, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T02:57:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T02:57:00.000Z-Please_reinstate_image","replies":[]}}-->

Hello - you recently deleted this article, although the reason you provided makes no sense. Please explain. JKW111 (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T03:08:00.000Z","author":"JKW111","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JKW111-2012-01-12T03:08:00.000Z-M.D.N.A.","replies":[]}}-->

Oh nevermind - i see now, there were two separate articles, although some wikilinks now go to deleted article. JKW111 (talk) 03:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T03:11:00.000Z","author":"JKW111","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JKW111-2012-01-12T03:11:00.000Z-M.D.N.A.","replies":[]}}-->

There is no bad brunches on my tree!!! return michael! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.71.197 (talk) 03:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T03:21:00.000Z","author":"24.1.71.197","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-24.1.71.197-2012-01-12T03:21:00.000Z-M.D.N.A.","replies":[]}}-->

• 152.226.7.211 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)and 152.226.6.204 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) had been inappropriately performing vandalism. Please do something about this.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T04:01:00.000Z","author":"NeoBatfreak","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-NeoBatfreak-2012-01-12T04:01:00.000Z-Vandal_report","replies":[]}}-->

Warned user. If any of the IPs continues to vandalize, let me know and I'll block them. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:06:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:06:00.000Z-Vandal_report","replies":[]}}-->

Read Guo Jing and Beggars' Sect to finding out which pages they have vandalized and I've put up on fixing it.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 07:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:17:00.000Z","author":"NeoBatfreak","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-NeoBatfreak-2012-01-12T07:17:00.000Z-Vandal_report","replies":[]}}-->

Hello Fastly, have you read my previous message? I think the article is already ok, User:Pravdaverita/Sonorama, can u already accept it? Thank you, Regards --Pravdaverita (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-14T13:43:00.000Z","author":"Pravdaverita","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pravdaverita-2012-01-14T13:43:00.000Z-Sonorama","replies":[]}}-->

I am sorry but my temper is really high now. According to wikipedia I (the creator of the article) can contest the proposed deletion. I was actually doing that but then I clicked save and all of a sudden it was gone. Basically you did not give me the chance to contest this deletion. I will act bossy here but please just revive the page because I did not copyright that one section, I rewrote it in my own full words. By the way did you even bother to inspect why it was put up for deletion. I bet you didn't because even the most stupid idiotic people would see that this page was not copyright at all. I actually remember when we went into this situation with the History of Indian football page when I supposedly copyrighted that from an article created after I created this page. This is almost the same case. I am being accused of unjustified copyright and I would love to have my views expressed without you or someone else deleting it without my word. Thank you. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-10T20:27:00.000Z","author":"Arsenalkid700","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-10T20:27:00.000Z-PUNJAB_FOOTBALL_ASSOCIATION","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:52:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-10T20:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

Do you have the revised text of the page? If so, feel free to re-post. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:52, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T02:52:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:52:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-10T20:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-11T03:48:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

I do not have one. I usually would store a copy of the page but I created the PFA page on my London Laptop when I was there. Can you just restore the page and I can revise that one section like when what happened with the history of Indian football page. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 03:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-11T03:48:00.000Z","author":"Arsenalkid700","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-11T03:48:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-11T02:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-12T11:17:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-11T03:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ok you have still not replied. I am just going to guess that you had a lot of people to reply back to and missed my post. Anyway I want to know if the Punjab Football Association page can be recovered. Like I said I can fix it if given the page and I don't have time to recreate it so please if you can, restore the page and the copyright will be fixed. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 11:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T11:17:00.000Z","author":"Arsenalkid700","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-12T11:17:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-11T03:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T01:26:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-12T11:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Have patience. Even the business world does not move this fast. I have a big talk page with many messages and I don't always notice changes that are made to it. For future reference, instead of threatening to be my personal poltergeist, you could move the thread to the bottom of the page, where I'd be more likely to notice it. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T01:26:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T01:26:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-12T11:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-13T01:34:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-13T01:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

Fair enough. I am sorry bout that. Like I probably mentioned before to you or maybe someone else I am very serious when it comes to wikipedia. Also I do have a problem with being impatient. Once again I am sorry about that. I do understand how many questions you get per day and next time I will take your advice. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T01:34:00.000Z","author":"Arsenalkid700","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-13T01:34:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-13T01:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2012-01-13T01:44:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-13T01:34:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker)It's good to know that you are serious about Wikipedia, I myself haven't been able to edit it that often lately. I myself have an impatience issue but I realized that being impatient doesn't get you anywhere except for boiling water. Patience is a virtue. Here's a tip, if you see a speedy deletion tagged on your page, quickly go to edit and copy the source code minus speedy deletion template, go to the talk page and contest it, if the page is gone, at least the source code is in your clipboard and you can create a subpage in your userspace and paste it there, or if it's your article, why not move it to your userspace and remove the template from the page and continue editing it from there. It shouldn't be deleted as long as it's in your userspace. As for you Fastily, I would recommend maybe setting MiszaBot to maybe 12h.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 01:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T01:44:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2012-01-13T01:44:00.000Z-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-13T01:34:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

Hahaha thanks for the advice cyber stalker. :) I will follow your advice as well. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 02:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T02:30:00.000Z","author":"Arsenalkid700","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Arsenalkid700-2012-01-13T02:30:00.000Z-PUNJAB_FOOTBALL_ASSOCIATION","replies":[]}}-->

I noticed you deleted this article because of non notability. I have references that prove that this article is notable Ref 1. As you can see under the team lineups it says Drivers name for Burton Albion, so he has made a professional appearance. Thanks for your time. Zbase4 (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T03:49:00.000Z","author":"Zbase4","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zbase4-2012-01-12T03:49:00.000Z-Callum_Driver","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:04:00.000Z-Zbase4-2012-01-12T03:49:00.000Z"]}}-->

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 12#Callum Driver. Feel free to comment. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:04:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T07:04:00.000Z-Zbase4-2012-01-12T03:49:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I see this article has been deleted as being the same as one previously created. Not so - the difference is that Driver has now made his full football and professional debut with a fully pro side in Burton Albion. This debut is referenced in the article. Please restore the article as notability has now been established and referenced - Thanks.--Egghead06 (talk) 07:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z","author":"Egghead06","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Egghead06-2012-01-12T07:44:00.000Z-Callum_Driver","replies":[]}}-->

Can provide further reliable sources for notability. Otherwise can it be restored please?--Egghead06 (talk) 05:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:53:00.000Z","author":"Egghead06","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Egghead06-2012-01-13T05:53:00.000Z-Callum_Driver","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily

First of all, I would like to thank you for what you are doing on Wikipedia. In fact, I am writing about companies on the translation market tools that are applying the cloud computing. And I begin my work with the product that I know best and the others later. Could you please let me know how can I repair my work and why the other companies information can be published on Wikipedia. I am very appreciated if you let me know the reason so that I can do better and write more article about them. I'm looking forward to hearing from you.

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huy Quoc Nguyen Dang (talk • contribs) 09:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T09:12:00.000Z","author":"Huy Quoc Nguyen Dang","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Huy_Quoc_Nguyen_Dang-2012-01-12T09:12:00.000Z-Delete_the_Article_Wordbee-_translator.","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T19:38:00.000Z-Huy_Quoc_Nguyen_Dang-2012-01-12T09:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G11 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T19:38:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T19:38:00.000Z-Huy_Quoc_Nguyen_Dang-2012-01-12T09:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily,

First of all, I would like to thank you for what you are doing on Wikipedia. I'm writing you because you deleted page of Depositphotos stock photo agency with the reason of "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Could you specify please why you made such a decision. The company has been already established on the stock photography market and serves tens thousands of customers worldwide. Isn't that fact enough for the company to be featured on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mallboro (talk • contribs) 11:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T11:04:00.000Z","author":"Mallboro","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mallboro-2012-01-12T11:04:00.000Z-Deletion_of_Depositphotos_page","replies":["c-JamesBWatson-2012-01-12T12:05:00.000Z-Mallboro-2012-01-12T11:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

If Fastily doesn't mind my commenting, it seems to me that we have here an example of a surprisingly common kind of misunderstanding. As you yourself have pointed out, the reason for deletion was that the article was written as "advertising or promotion", not because the company is not significant enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. It may be that the subject is perfectly suitable for an article to be written about it, but that particular article was not written like an advertisement, and so was unacceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T12:05:00.000Z","author":"JamesBWatson","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JamesBWatson-2012-01-12T12:05:00.000Z-Mallboro-2012-01-12T11:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi James. Thank you for clarifying this for me. I wrote Depositphotos article in a style that very similar to pre-existed articles of Depositphotos' competitors. It will be very helpful if you can tell me what part of the article made it look like an advertisement. Thank you in advance. Mallboro (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC).__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T15:01:00.000Z","author":"Mallboro","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mallboro-2012-01-12T15:01:00.000Z-Deletion_of_Depositphotos_page","replies":["c-Bwilkins-2012-01-12T17:13:00.000Z-Mallboro-2012-01-12T15:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

(talk page stalker) Well, the fact that prices for the photos are listed, how one becomes a contributor. Oh, and the fact that the only reference is its own website. If this is based on other articles, I'll warn you about WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS because it looks like we'll have to purge some "competitors" as well (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T17:13:00.000Z","author":"Bwilkins","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Bwilkins-2012-01-12T17:13:00.000Z-Mallboro-2012-01-12T15:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, please read this: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-August/027373.html 87.236.209.23 (talk) 12:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T12:59:00.000Z","author":"87.236.209.23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-87.236.209.23-2012-01-12T12:59:00.000Z-File:U.S._RQ-170_on_display_in_Iran_1.jpg","replies":["c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z-87.236.209.23-2012-01-12T12:59:00.000Z"]}}-->

That's immiterial. What's important here is that there is no source and no license for that file. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z-87.236.209.23-2012-01-12T12:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dpmuk-2012-01-12T15:46:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z","c-Dpmuk-2012-01-12T15:51:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z","c-Dpmuk-2012-01-12T16:12:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z"]}}-->

If you're posting that mailing list link because of the recent PUF discussion then it was raised there and Fastily has also acknowledged to me on this page that when he closed the PUF he was only determining whether the image was unfree (which it clearly isn't as it's PD) not whether we should use it. I do intend to start a RfC on whether we can use such images as that e-mail seems out of keeping with current practice but it's the most recent thing we've got and still referenced at WP:C. I've removed the speedy tag as I don't feel it's appropriate. Take to WP:FfD if desired. Dpmuk (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T15:46:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-12T15:46:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Oh and there is a source in the upload comment. I'm going to assume good faith that the article does give the Iranian government as the source of the photo (given the language I can't tell) as it does seem the highly probable source. If that's the case it's PD, which is the reason for the deleted PD-Iran in US tag. It's definitely PD so not a G12 we just need to sort out whether we should (rather than can) be using it. Off to start a RfC. Dpmuk (talk) 15:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T15:51:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-12T15:51:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

RfC started here. I will try and do more notifications later. Dpmuk (talk) 16:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T16:12:00.000Z","author":"Dpmuk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dpmuk-2012-01-12T16:12:00.000Z-Sven_Manguard-2012-01-12T14:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily,

Thank you very much for your response. I believe there was a misunderstanding which I would like to clear up - the article Oxford University Georgian Society was not simply reposted and hence in violation of G4. I have specifically addressed the issues raised under the Oxford Georgian Society Discussion page, and the article University of Oxford Georgian Society is now well referenced and cited with numerous external sources and reading materials, which was the issue with the previous article (anything that only has one reference has been removed). I believe its an interesting topic that has tens of analogous articles on Wikipedia (Oxford University Polish Society, Oxford University Greek Society, Oxford University Russian Society etc). I would thus like to kindly ask for the article Oxford University Georgian Society to be reinstated. Please let me know if you require any additional information / clarification.

Best regards,

--81.159.130.123 (talk) 15:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T15:32:00.000Z","author":"81.159.130.123","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-81.159.130.123-2012-01-12T15:32:00.000Z-University_of_Oxford_Georgian_Society_2","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, I went through the link you sent, and rewrote the article. I wanted to get other editor's opinion, but unfortunately WP:RFF is currently inactive. I am posting the content here before uploading it on main wiki page. Can you please have a look at it and let me know if this is okay now.

Green Planet For Kids is a Canadian magazine about green living ideas. It covers following areas Water Electricity Heating and cooling RRR (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) Yard and garden Transportation, and Environmental choices

This annually published magazine started in 2010, and 260,000 copies were distributed across Canada in 2011. The magazine uses a dinosaur group of cartoon characters in the form of comic strips to depicts different green ideas. It has an accompanying website, and an ipad app — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick helps (talk • contribs) 15:44, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T15:44:00.000Z","author":"Nick helps","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nick_helps-2012-01-12T15:44:00.000Z-Green_Planet_4_Kids_2","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T19:41:00.000Z-Nick_helps-2012-01-12T15:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry, I just updated the link. It'll take you somewhere where you can get another opinion. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T19:41:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T19:41:00.000Z-Nick_helps-2012-01-12T15:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Could you take care of this? thank you. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 15:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T15:53:00.000Z","author":"198.102.153.2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-198.102.153.2-2012-01-12T15:53:00.000Z-newline_at_the_top_of_geobox","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-12T19:42:00.000Z-198.102.153.2-2012-01-12T15:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

 Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T19:42:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-12T19:42:00.000Z-198.102.153.2-2012-01-12T15:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

What was the reason of deleting page: 'Bestselling cars of all time'. I suppose you, or someone else might have thought that if there already is 'List of bestselling automobiles' & 'List of bestselling automobiles' such page as 'Bestselling cars of all time' is usles. But as a metter of a fact it was completely different content! It might have been unnoticed for someone who isn't interested in such topics. Once again, I'm politely asking to recreate that page.

I'm looking forward for your answer.

(edit conflict)(talk page stalker) The reason given for the deletion: "G7 One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page" I'm not an Admin so I can not see who the author is but, even if it's Fastily, if an author request deletion there's not much an admin can do. Mlpearc powwow 17:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T17:13:00.000Z","author":"Mlpearc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mlpearc-2012-01-12T17:13:00.000Z-Deletion_of_'Bestselling_cars_of_all_time'","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Fastily,

On December 2, 2011 you deleted File:Nelson_Denis.jpg pursuant to this PUF discussion: [22]

The following day on December 3, 2011, as part of an Administrator's Noticeboard discussion [23], you provided me the following, and very helpful, guidelines:

• I recommended that you send an email to OTRS, which you did. When the email you sent is processed, and if the permissions are valid, the file will be restored. Frankly, I've done everything I can for you... -FASTILY (TALK) 20:55, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Your guidelines were followed. OTRS has verified and approved the permission as valid. The photo file has been restored. [24]

Thank you for your guidance in this matter. It was very helpful, and greatly appreciated. Nelsondenis248 (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T22:18:00.000Z","author":"Nelsondenis248","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nelsondenis248-2012-01-12T22:18:00.000Z-Thank_you,_Fastily_-_OTRS_review_and_approval","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T04:55:00.000Z-Nelsondenis248-2012-01-12T22:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm glad to hear that it worked out. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T04:55:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T04:55:00.000Z-Nelsondenis248-2012-01-12T22:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Unambiguous copyright infringement, eh? Can I point out that I got the majority of the information in the article was sourced from Wikipedia and some from the audio podcast of Big Finish (I think it was early November 2011) and from a brief bio.

Given the 90% of Wikipedia is material taken from other sources and then redrafted, I think you decision to target my little article seems a little churlish. Has Miss Olsson offended you in anyway? Did you ask for an autograph and she slighted you? Or do you have a particular disdain for voice actors?

I'd have to assume all of those, because the decision to delete the article without suggestion of amendment would appear to breach the very spirit of Wikipedia, the "peoples encyclopedia", providing us with a real glimpse into what is effectively a cabal of like minded people. Or am I wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ascolti (talk • contribs) 23:18, 12 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-12T23:18:00.000Z","author":"Ascolti","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ascolti-2012-01-12T23:18:00.000Z-Katarina_Olsson","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T01:15:00.000Z-Ascolti-2012-01-12T23:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

User:Fastily/E#G12 -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T01:15:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T01:15:00.000Z-Ascolti-2012-01-12T23:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for deleting these two articles today. Best, A Sniper (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T03:34:00.000Z","author":"A Sniper","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A_Sniper-2012-01-13T03:34:00.000Z-Tymon_Kruidenier,_et_al","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T04:55:00.000Z-A_Sniper-2012-01-13T03:34:00.000Z"]}}-->

No problem, happy to have been able to help. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T04:55:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T04:55:00.000Z-A_Sniper-2012-01-13T03:34:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I don't see how this article could possibly qualify as unambiguous advertising or promotion, and it has previously survived a deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Miller). I think it should be restored. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:01:00.000Z","author":"Bongwarrior","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bongwarrior-2012-01-13T05:01:00.000Z-Mac_Miller","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:02:00.000Z-Bongwarrior-2012-01-13T05:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry, didn't realize you had already declined the speedy.  Restored -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:02:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:02:00.000Z-Bongwarrior-2012-01-13T05:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bongwarrior-2012-01-13T05:03:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:03:00.000Z","author":"Bongwarrior","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Bongwarrior-2012-01-13T05:03:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This editor has been around since 2007, and has almost 70,000 edits, but it looks like he's created 30 or 40 articles of the type I tagged tonight and you deleted: an article about a non-notable actor that consists of a generic single sentence lede followed by a filmography straight out of IMDB. These are all actors who played bit parts, many or most of which they weren't even credited for, so they're clearly non-notable, as least as far as the data from IMDB shows, and the articles don't pass our notability requirements.

I've never come across a situation quite like this, so I don't know what the best thing to do here is. Any ideas? Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:29:00.000Z","author":"Beyond My Ken","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Beyond_My_Ken-2012-01-13T05:29:00.000Z-User:Lord_Cornwallis","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:38:00.000Z-Beyond_My_Ken-2012-01-13T05:29:00.000Z"]}}-->

I would recommend leaving a note on the editor's talk page (I see you've already done that here), and politely ask them to stop creating such articles. If they refuse or recreate the articles, this can be remedied with continued warnings and subsequent blocks as necessary. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:38:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:38:00.000Z-Beyond_My_Ken-2012-01-13T05:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-Beyond_My_Ken-2012-01-13T05:43:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

OK, thanks, that's what I'll do. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:43:00.000Z","author":"Beyond My Ken","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Beyond_My_Ken-2012-01-13T05:43:00.000Z-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

While you were deleting Holiday Plaza, I was editing it to remove the attack part. The whole thing wasn't an attack article, so I think that editing is better than speedy deletion. I did, however, tag the article for notability and prod it. However, I don't really care that much, and don't particularly mind if you re-delete what I put. If not, and if it survives prod, then we should undelete the rest of the history for attribution purposes. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:41:00.000Z","author":"Qwyrxian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Qwyrxian-2012-01-13T05:41:00.000Z-Holiday_Plaza","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:43:00.000Z-Qwyrxian-2012-01-13T05:41:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah, sorry about that. Please feel free to undelete as necessary. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T05:43:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T05:43:00.000Z-Qwyrxian-2012-01-13T05:41:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Fastily, You deleted 'File:Harry-barr-epping-1948.jpg' with your reason F11. I was the author and uploader and had followed the directions on the deletion request by sending an email to permissions@wikimedia.org on 02/01/2012. I received a response back today 13/01/2012 asking me to use a specific email template. Of course it is too late now so I'm not sure what to do. Do I reupload the file or can you restore it? Benlevy1 (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T08:30:00.000Z","author":"Benlevy1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Benlevy1-2012-01-13T08:30:00.000Z-Holiday_Plaza","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T10:43:00.000Z-Benlevy1-2012-01-13T08:30:00.000Z"]}}-->

Continue the email correspondence. Once you provide the necessary details/release of permission to our OTRS team, the file will be automatically restored. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T10:43:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T10:43:00.000Z-Benlevy1-2012-01-13T08:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The Admin's Barnstar

Deleting articles is a sure-fire way of drawing editorial fire ("How dare you delete my article on something I drew on a napkin in 1992?") but rarely will you get commended for it. To rectify the balance: a barnstar, for performing this much-needed and underappreciated task quietly and diligently. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T10:30:00.000Z","author":"Yunshui","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yunshui-2012-01-13T10:30:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!_2","replies":["c-Fastily-2012-01-13T10:42:00.000Z-Yunshui-2012-01-13T10:30:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you!! I really appreciate it :) Cheers, FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-13T10:42:00.000Z","author":"Fastily","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Fastily-2012-01-13T10:42:00.000Z-Yunshui-2012-01-13T10:30:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->