User talk:FunPika

This article is trying to be split to match interwiki articles, he put in alot of effort in making all the content stay intact. Please don't revert him ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 15:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I also added him to Huggle's whitelist. FunPika 15:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Would it be possible for some of my AfC reviews to be examined by you? User Ryan Vesey raised some concerns and I would like to receive third-party opinions on this. Please highlight any errors in my talk page. Thank you for your trouble! Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I am not actually completely new to Wikipedia as I have been making edits for a while and my IP address seems to change frequently. I have not created an account yet but may be convinced to create one soon.

I noticed that you reverted my 4im warning to the vandal on List of prison deaths, so does this mean that I was too severe? Have I been too severe with other user warnings too?

Thanks for the welcome again! 174.138.193.65 (talk) 21:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I considered the use of 4im on a first offense to be too severe. According to Wikipedia:WikiProject_user_warnings/Usage_and_layout#Multi-level_templates_for_vandalism, in general vandalism warnings should start with a level 1, 2, or 3 template depending on how blatant the vandalism is (although I personally will start with 1 in almost all cases). That page is not very clear on the appropriate use of 4im warnings to me, although personally I would use them if someone continues to vandalize after a previous block. Also, I would indeed strongly suggest making an account if you are interesting in fighting vandalism, since with an account you will be able to use tools such as Twinkle and Rollback (in the case of Rollback it must be requested at WP:PERM and an admin will likely look for a large volume of vandalism reverts on an account before granting it) to quickly revert vandalism. FunPika 01:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can only imagine that this was the result of you trying to cope with an edit conflict.

Please be more careful. :| — Scott • talk 11:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. Please see here ANI

This article needs improvement, and you may have been involved with this article. There have been random changes that may affect the page's Featured Article status. Soon I'll nominate it for FA Review if issues aren't resolved. George Ho (talk) 07:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry my little sister knows computers very well and she might of changed it to get me in trouble. I am so sorry and will be more careful next time.

68.9.32.149 (talk) 19:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)someone[reply]

Hi FunPika, and thanks for writing Module:TimeAgo! I've put it up live, so your code is now being used in 120,000 pages. I did tweak a couple of things - see the page history for my comments. If any of the comments aren't clear, please feel free to ask me about them. Also, be careful about leaving whitespace in the template invocation - in this revision of the sandbox you left a line break between #invoke and the noinclude tags, and that was included in the template output. But I really couldn't find much to complain about in your code - thank you for helping to further the Lua cause, and let me know if you have any questions about converting templates in the future. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 04:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean to get in the way on the G7 tagging. Thanks for reverting my warning on the author page, I was just going over there to fix that and found you'd already done it for me. Cheers! Geoff ^{Who, me?} 00:43, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for helping with the defunct templates. I've updated the AWB code to remove a problem where it would incorrect remove the website field in the Cite web template. That fix + some others are in the new version of the AWB code here- Once again, thanks for your help. - X201 (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FunPika! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FunPika. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 04:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 04:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FunPika. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Emailconfirmed users. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Emailconfirmed users redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FunPika! Since you're currently not active at ACC, policy requires me to remove the account creator user right from your account. Let an ACC tool admin know at any time if you wish to return; I'll add the account creator user right back to your account no problem. I hope you're doing well and that we speak again soon. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FunPika. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FunPika. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:FunPika/Userboxes/User celeron, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FunPika/Userboxes/User celeron and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:FunPika/Userboxes/User celeron during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pokémon RPGs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FunPika! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:PCP. Since you had some involvement with the Template:PCP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Magioladitis (talk) 07:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PediaPress. This is to advise you that the article is up for AfD once again. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 18:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is notice that you have one or more registered bot accounts that will be retired and deactivated. See Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Inactive_bots_-_February_2022. Should you wish to reactivate your bot please reply there within the week. Else, no action is needed. Should you wish to reactivate the bot in the future, please file a request at WP:BRFA. Best regards, — xaosflux ^Talk 10:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]