User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2022/May

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lee Vilenski. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Congratulations, Lee Vilenski! The article you nominated, 2021 World Snooker Championship, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article, "about the 2021 version of the World Snooker Championship. Third times the charm!"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

The article Neville Chamberlain (police officer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Neville Chamberlain (police officer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 14:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I added this article to Wikipedia:Good articles/Warfare. Feel free to move it somewhere else if you want. There are probably several categories it could go in. Steelkamp (talk) 14:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Also note that I would be very grateful for a review of one of my GAN's as I am just below the Wikicup cut-off for the next round. Steelkamp (talk) 14:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Anything in particular? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Clarkson railway station, Perth. It is a nearly 2 month old nomination and almost all the sources would be accessible to you. Any of them really though. Steelkamp (talk) 14:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Lee. In relation to your request for feedback on the review, I'd say it was happy and pleasant. Steelkamp (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

This is a 20 year show with a huge fanbase. There are numerous issues with the changes you're making. There are *multiple* discussion threads on the survivor subreddit pointing out all of the issues with the changes you're making, but the community at large is especially attached to the color charts. I understand that people who are color blind need other indicators to get information, but there is no reason to remove the colors for everyone else.

The color tribe charts and voting charts are important to the show. They indicate at a glance how much control someone had over a vote and in multiple tribe switch seasons, they're especially helpful to track a contestant's journey through multiple tribes.

Additionally, there is survivor lore around tribe colors, including stats on which tribe colors are most popular and most cursed. Using the actual tribe colors on the wiki is important.

Additionally, it is inappropriate to make the main photo the DVD cover instead of the season logo. You are spoiling every season but 1 by doing so, and not giving people the opportunity to visit the page without being immediately spoiled by the photo alone.

Overall the changes you're making are bad. Bad for the fandom, and just largely harder to follow. Please stop. We beg you. 173.67.8.6 (talk) 21:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a fan site. We are an encyclopaedia. We have rules around how tables should be displayed. I haven't been changing the logos on these pages, but they are protected by WP:SPOILER. The survivor "fandom" seems to believe that this website is a fansite designed for "lore". Using the actual tribe colors on the wiki is important. - it simply isn't. There is incalculable amount of articles on teams that have a dedicated colour, but shouldn't just have that at every opportunity.

Quite frankly, the survivor Reddit is not Wikipedia, where we have rules in place to keep things both accessible and readable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Rather than have this conversation as a split over many pages, I've created a suitable thread at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Survivor_task_force#MOS_fixes_for_tables. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Going to have to agree with the user above, these changes have made the Survivor pages uglier and harder to follow. Your dubious citation of color standards and lack of peer review has upended a system that was put in place over a decade before you decided to butt in. You are literally the only person that takes issue with the way the pages looked before. Bachwiz18 (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm simply not the only person, as you have been conflating my edits on one series of tables with an overhaul of other tables and DVD logos. My talk page is not the location to discuss these changes, see WT:TV#‎Reality tv show progression and other tables, MOS and WP:ACCESS Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

I would just liked to add to the consensus that you are making the survivor pages difficult to read by removing colors. I get there is a MOS but I'm assuming there's some room for common sense there as well.

Also, the DVD cover you are using as main images usually only feature players that make it past the merge and the winner (so if they aren't on there you know they don't win). I think the season logo's were more than sufficient to represent here.

Thanks 184.144.82.200 (talk) 14:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

I haven't been changing the images used on these pages. Please comment on the current discussions rather than bombard my talk page at WT:TV#‎Reality tv show progression and other tables, MOS and WP:ACCESS Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 09:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Why the sunbeam old fashioned bread is hardly ever fresh in the stores anymore all the stores i go to the bread comes in hard and be stall in less than a week after purchasing ive started buying other bread that's fresher but I love my sunbeam bread better --Gmoney28456 (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kamila Khodjaeva and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 3#Kamila Khodjaeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tvx1 23:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

The article Survivor: Cook Islands you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Survivor: Cook Islands for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Panini! • 🥪 22:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hermann Göring on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Lee Vilenski, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Peter Ebdon. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. -JML1148 (talk) 23:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Lee Vilenski. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Peter Ebdon at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! -JML1148 (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Administrator changes Colin M David.Monniaux • Fribbler • Grue • Kpjas • West.andrew.g

CheckUser changes Ks0stm Oversighter changes Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
• Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.

Technical news

• The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
• A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.

Arbitration

• Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maya (given name) on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

On 3 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 World Snooker Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

May songs

I am so impressed to see this in the news, right after the day with the 2021 World Snooker Championship for TFA and 1977 World Snooker Championship for DYK! - I have the quirky today, which is rare ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda Arendt! can't take any credit for the DYK though. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

sometimes nice coincidences happen, planned and unplanned - today performances in Ukraine - for Ukraine - for peace, at the bottom an imaginary set of eight DYK - and more May pics--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2009 European Team Championships on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi, just so you know, I looked at the article and the subject in question and had commented my opinion (justified a delete) in the AfD page linked. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 13:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC) {{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peripatetic groups of Afghanistan on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Dear Mentor, I recently updated the "Nina Menkes" page with valid information, and all my edits were revised. Can you help with this? Im so frustrated. I wanted to do more edits but now Im just discouraged.. thank you -G.G. --GlendaGDWN (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi GlendaGDWN - I'd love to help, but talk:Nina Menkes is a better location for this. Justlettersandnumbers reverted your changes on the page mostly due to the sources you were using not being reliable. Something being valid doesn't mean its suitable for us to include. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

GlendaGDWN, please don't be discouraged! Unfortunately that page has a very long history of inappropriate editing by people apparently connected to, or paid by, the subject. May I gently suggest that you choose a less contentious page to improve? Or that you mention on the talk-page the errors or omissions that you see in it? Thanks! (oh, and hi, Lee V!). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi! Hope you are well! Apologies for the ping, but easier than explaining the individual sources. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
231		Amanda Kimmel (talk)	Add sources
10		FIM Snowcross World Championship (talk)	Add sources
768		Eight-ball (talk)	Add sources
16		World Life Saving Championships (talk)	Add sources
149		Classic Tetris World Championship (talk)	Add sources
58		Pétanque World Championships (talk)	Add sources
62		Jermaine Johnson (footballer) (talk)	Cleanup
23		World Surfing Games (talk)	Cleanup
420		Black Clover (season 2) (talk)	Cleanup
17		World Trail Orienteering Championships (talk)	Expand
10		Men's Roller Derby World Cup (talk)	Expand
52		Animeism (talk)	Expand
4		Skinakas (hypothetical basin) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
7		San Fernando Line (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
202		Crokinole (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
110		Genies in popular culture (talk)	Merge
1,470		Assassination Classroom (talk)	Merge
5		Atlético Nacional (Panama) (talk)	Merge
159		History of Eastern role-playing video games (talk)	Wikify
124		Porter Ranch, Los Angeles (talk)	Wikify
485		Tactical role-playing game (talk)	Wikify
11		Carom3D (talk)	Orphan
13		Ajilesoro (talk)	Orphan
2		Alam Udang Bum (talk)	Orphan
12		Bowlliards (talk)	Stub
278		Ahmad bin Ali Stadium (talk)	Stub
97		Shizuka Ishigami (talk)	Stub
10		Jermaine Taylor (footballer) (talk)	Stub
55		IBSF World Billiards Championship (talk)	Stub
2		Kenkō (crater) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC) {{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations, Lee Vilenski! The list you nominated, Snooker world rankings 2018/2019, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Lee Vilenski. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Survivor: Africa at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Lee, re your request, I've copy-editing only – GOCE is not CLEANUP. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

On 21 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Slosh (cue sport), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the game of slosh shares the name with a English batter and sausage dish? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slosh (cue sport). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Slosh (cue sport)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Slosh (cue sport) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

The article Slosh (cue sport) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Slosh (cue sport) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Red link on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

The article Slosh (cue sport) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Slosh (cue sport) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on 2021 Tour Championship. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

I know that you are going to close this, but I added another example of canvassing to the discussion. I know I should have done it sooner. Apologies if this causes more disruption. I have no intention to continue that discussion on the talk page. Politrukki (talk) 10:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Politrukki - thanks for letting me know. That particular RFC had a real issue with it being spread across many different pages (such as the ones you outlined, previous discussions, and the AN thread). Whilst the above isn't suitable (I'd argue it's also forum shopping), I don't think it broke the validity of the RfC. I hope the closure is treated well, I took quite a while reading through all of the discussions. This sort of thing is best dealt with at the time, rather than to sway the closure of the topic. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• Hi, Lee. Did you miss that the version with the disputed phrase is the longstanding text? Normally no consensus means restore the status quo, so the correct close would "no consensus to remove" the disputed phrase.—S Marshall T/C 21:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

S Marshall Apologies if it wasn't clear! No consensus means no consensus. As you say, in practice this means to retain the information that was present before the RFC. However, the RFC was written in such a way that it wasn't asking if the information should be removed, simply if it was suitable for the lede (probably a poorly worded RFC). There isn't a consensus to remove, as you say, but there also isn't a consensus to keep. The close, practically means to retain the status quo, but doesn't condemn or approve the text. I don't personally like the phrase "no consensus to remove" as it suggests there is a consensus to keep. I hope I've explained that well enough, but happy to look at the exact wording if it's deemed confusing! Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

whoops, forgot to ping S Marshall Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

	The Closer's Barnstar
	Your thoughtful and concise closures at Talk:WSJ and Talk:RP (US) did not go unnoticed. Please accept this token of appreciation for your excellent work. Atsme 💬 📧 23:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2022 Welsh Open (snooker) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Lee Vilenski/Archives/2022,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 823 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 847 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aleksandr Dvornikov on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello guys I have an question for you Who is the best captain Virat kohli or MS Dhoni --Deepesh kafalatiya (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Deepesh kafalatiya - I'm not sure I understand your question. Have you got any questions on how to edit Wikipedia? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello I need gift Card now --Daramola William (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Daramola William - I'm not sure I understand your question. Have you got any questions on how to edit Wikipedia? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Aap kaha se ho sir --Deepesh kafalatiya (talk) 04:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Economics on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

how to write google knowledge panel and a pear immediately --Smallco (talk) 02:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Smallco we don't look after Google knowledge bar. That's something that Google does and may link Wikipedia. Any article created won't show on Google at all until it has been page patrolled. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I want to Add John Delin, and Sam Young both excommunicated from Mormom (LDS) religion to the former members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, former MORMONS.

They are both TRUTH tellers and both are knowledgable and add significant value to the current list. Both are highly visible and creditable. Both have several thousand followers who are also former Mormons. --Sheila M. Strassburg (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Are you trying to get an article written about these people? We need them to be written about in reliable, secondary sources in detail. For more information, see our general notability guidelines. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Lee, it is superfluous to cite each race win, and is never done on other horse race jockey articles, such as Willie Carson, Pat Eddery, Eddie Delahoussaye etc. If there is a dispute, then a reference can then be required, no problem. I don't believe there is any controversy regarding the winners so the tag (IMHO) should be removed. I have used the guidance on When to use (or not use) the "citation needed tag". Best wishes. SethWhales ^talk 22:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

I have added an archived reference as a source at bottom of the "Major wins" section from racingbase.com. SethWhales ^talk 05:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Seth Whales - thanks for adding a source, that was what was required. We don't add references on request - we add them for all information. Something doesn't need to be controversial to require a citation. So long as that source covers all of the wins listed, there's no issue. Other jockeys being similarly poorly sourced isn't great either. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Lee, would you Support it for ITN now? SethWhales ^talk 09:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I already had, after some changes. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Robb Elementary School shooting on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)