User talk:Legoktm/December 2013

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Legoktm. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Legoktm:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1900 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013! If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive! If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 23:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

There's been a backlog at WT:DBR since late September. Could you take a look at it? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm unlikely to have any time soon to look at it, sorry. Legoktm (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

08:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Lego, nice page indeed. May I ask whether it's complete? Ed will be back online soon, and we want to publish at the latest on Wednesday US east coast time, this week in particular because of breaking news. Tony (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Tony1, it's pretty much done. Ed had suggested some improvements that I've mostly implemented. And thanks for the copyedit! Legoktm (talk) 19:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello - would you please re-create Big! (redirect)? The special redirect is there intentionally for tracking purposes. Thanks. Dohn joe (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

...tracking what? Legoktm (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Tracking the number of people who visit certain pages from the disambiguation page. It's one way to get some idea of where people go after they land on a dab page. Dohn joe (talk) 05:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Ummm, is there consensus for your analytics project? I'm not a huge fan of this idea, especially without any documentation. Legoktm (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

It's been done before, both by me (see Talk:Doctor Zhivago, for instance) and others (see here, for example). They're meant to be temporary. When I or someone else has a sufficient amount of data, they go away.... Dohn joe (talk) 05:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I went ahead and re-created it, since continuity of results is important. Please don't delete again without letting me know. Thanks. Dohn joe (talk) 17:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

@Dohn joe: Please document this project of yours (or others) somewhere others can verify and understand (Is there an end date to this project? Was there or should there be consensus? Should they be removed at some point? Should all links become redirects on disambiguation pages or only some? Which and who decides?).
Make this documentation discoverable, perhaps group these redirects using a "R from .." template/category and link to said documentation from the category description page.
Different editors, especially experienced ones I imagine, will continue to remove these silly-looking redirects if there is no reasonable way to discover why it is (still) there. Sure we assume good faith and should keep innocent and unknown variations in syntax as-is if in doubt, but resolving redirects itself is generally good. Considering redirects are visible to users (through a "Redirected from .." header on the landing page), people will inevitably notice them (especially experienced editors might get itched) and question their usefulness if there is no way of knowing what they are for. Consider coming up with a way to hide them from the user, since they are only for tracking purposes (perhaps hide the the "Redirected from"-message for these kind of redirects by default, using site css?). Lastly, if you intend to create more in the future, a descriptive edit summary (with a link to the documentation) might be useful. Thanks! Krinkle (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate all those comments, Krinkle. And frankly, I'd implement them all if I knew how. In particular - could you explain how to make them invisible via site css? That's beyond my know-how. I can probably figure out the category/template issue, but would also appreciate guidance there. Thanks. Dohn joe (talk) 20:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I support the use of these, as with the Doctor Zhivago example; I would suggest a 90-day time limit, as that is usually the period of use that gets looked at in proposed page move discussions. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:19, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at WP:AN regarding to get clarification on the topic. The thread is "Notifying users of a sockpuppet discussion".The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/header. Thank you. --···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:11, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

That's pretty silly. Legoktm (talk) 20:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I posted that to the wrong place, I meant to post it to the talk page and I guess I clicked the wrong spot. I forgot for a minute only Arbcom and clerk are allowed to post on the Arbcom Noticeboard. I moved the string to the Arbcom noticeboard talkpage instead. Feel free to revert it again if that's the wrong place. I'm not going to repost it again so that's a good way to stop the discussion before it gets started. Not that I think anything will come of it anyway. The Arbcom has pretty much lost all respect I had for it and I think that is true for the majority of the community as well. Which I am sure is a mutual feeling about me. Sorry if I seem like a jerk today more than normal. Its nothing personal too you. Kumioko (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

@KumiokoCleanStart: The noticeboard is designed for discussion of actual announcements, but editors in the past have started stand-alone threads and I see no reason why you can't too. For future reference, WT:AC would be your other choice; but I would recommend against moving the thread again, simply because the noticeboard talk page seems to the most widely watched. Also, as you say, moving your thread a third time for bureaucracy's sake would be unreasonable. Hope this helps, AGK [•] 23:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. Kumioko (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

08:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TFA Protector Bot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 07:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

Go to any nations page and tell me what you see. - A concerned wiki user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.116.148 (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

What? Legoktm (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

	The Technical Barnstar
	I posted at VP:T and within 13 minutes you provided a wizardly response. I was surprised and amazed. [21] —rybec 06:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC) corrected barnstar is below

I don't deserve any credit, it was all Betacommand. :) Legoktm (talk) 06:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for your collaboration with the banned editor Δ to promptly answer my request at VP:T. —rybec 07:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Requesting a slight modification to the bot's procedures for image uploads. Some of us include en:wp links in our Commons description pages with its {{w}} template. When the bot uploads such a page without modifications, chaos happens because our {{w}} template is a welcome template; see the history of File:Carnegie Free Library in Beaver Falls.jpg, on the Main Page right now, for an example. Could you tell the bot to convert links to brackets, e.g. any time it finds {{w|Wikipedia}} to convert it to [[Wikipedia]]? Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

JianhuiMobile ^talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

JianhuiMobile ^talk 07:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

As far as I know, your bot hasn't done this in a long time. As such, I propose that we integrate archive indexing into lowercase sigmabot III (talk · contribs). My bot can create indices as it archives pages, just as ClueBot does, so the indexes will always be up to date.

However, I am not sure what would be done with pages that transclude the HBC config template but not MiszaBot config.

How does this idea sound? →Σσς. (Sigma) 08:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

:D Legoktm (talk) 08:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

08:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Can you please take a look at User:Titiesfordays2? Rosario Berganza 03:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Blocked, thanks for the note. Legoktm (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Rosario Berganza 04:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

	Happy Holidays!! And thanks for taking care of us!
	From Hafspajen (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 12:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)