User talk:Ra2007
D. James Kennedy part II
Please do not reinsert the "Wrong version" image onto the talk page of the D. James Kennedy article. The talk page is not the place to express your displeasure with administrative actions. There are numerous other venues to express your displeasure, such as the Admin Noticeboards or the talk page of the admin who locked the page. Cheers! Baegis (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think your characterization as inflammatory is unfair. It was levity, humor, intended to lighten up. Did you read the actual image? Clearly humorous. Ra2007 (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Any humor purported to be gained through displaying the image is not enough to cancel out the fact it is not helping the article and that it is meant as a veiled personal attack at the admin who justly locked the page. Baegis (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your psychic powers are as defective as your sense of humor. It was not "meant as a veiled personal attack". And, in fact, the locking admin pointed me to the image (and he seems to have a better sense of humor than yours). [1]. You should be more concerned about the notorious orangemarlin trying to stir up trouble.[2] Ra2007 (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Though I never claimed to have any psychic powers, thanks for the...well, thank you for whatever that statement meant. My sense of humor is not tickled by obvious POV pushers, except when they are finally given the boot. And the only time I would ever worry about OrangeMarlin would be if he suddenly begin to allow those of your ilk any leeway. Baegis (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Which POV am I pushing, other than the WP:NPOV? Ra2007 (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Though I never claimed to have any psychic powers, thanks for the...well, thank you for whatever that statement meant. My sense of humor is not tickled by obvious POV pushers, except when they are finally given the boot. And the only time I would ever worry about OrangeMarlin would be if he suddenly begin to allow those of your ilk any leeway. Baegis (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your psychic powers are as defective as your sense of humor. It was not "meant as a veiled personal attack". And, in fact, the locking admin pointed me to the image (and he seems to have a better sense of humor than yours). [1]. You should be more concerned about the notorious orangemarlin trying to stir up trouble.[2] Ra2007 (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Any humor purported to be gained through displaying the image is not enough to cancel out the fact it is not helping the article and that it is meant as a veiled personal attack at the admin who justly locked the page. Baegis (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Eagle eyes
No worries. When I saw that 100kb of text got added to your page, something didn't add up!! Woody (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Anti Christian Movement (China)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Anti Christian Movement (China), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Christian Movement (China). Thank you.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.