User talk:Rollinginhisgrave
Response to claims of bias
If you are coming from Talk:Donald Trump/Response to claims of bias and are looking for assistance, leave a comment below, followed by ~~~~ and you will be responded to shortly. Thank youA belated thanks for reviewing St. John's Shaughnessy for GA status. You left lots of good feedback that I will use to improve the article. I appreciate the work you put into the review! Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of History of chocolateThe article History of chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:History of chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:History of chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 13:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Chocolate in savory cookingThe article Chocolate in savory cooking you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chocolate in savory cooking for comments about the article, and Talk:Chocolate in savory cooking/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Royiswariii -- Royiswariii (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Dark chocolateThe article Dark chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dark chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:Dark chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CosXZ -- CosXZ (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of White chocolateThe article White chocolate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:White chocolate and Talk:White chocolate/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Szmenderowiecki -- Szmenderowiecki (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC) WP:GARC: Invitation to review Justiniano BorgoñoHello Rollinginhisgrave, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Justiniano Borgoño. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite. To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #16. GMH Melbourne (talk) 02:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC) Too bitey and dismissiveSo feel free to improve it, provided you don't make it so long that it won't be read. I don't think editors care that much about its tone, we all just got very tired of all the time spent responding to these things. Btw such changes don't require revisiting consensus 61. If you feel a need to "personalize" the response, I don't see a problem with a brief reply in addition to the link. But ~95% of what needs to be said should be said in the response page. ―Mandruss ☎ 10:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Consensus 61 took some selling on my part. Before it passed, shoot on sight was routine for those things. Now we give a full, consistent response that at least tries to be respectful. So there are degrees of dismissiveness and perhaps you can see how my perspective is different on this. ―Mandruss ☎ 11:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
The response page was created in April 2020 with the expectation that it would just "catch on" naturally. When it hadn't done so by May 2023, I proposed #61. It passed, and it's a better world now. ;) ―Mandruss ☎ 01:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Hijacking this thread, what source were you referring to here? URL? ―Mandruss ☎ 12:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
User:TechnoSquirrel69 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: {{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 13:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of White chocolateThe article White chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:White chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:White chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Szmenderowiecki -- Szmenderowiecki (talk) 12:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Reversing consensus 20Re: [1] If you give a man a fish, he will eat today, but teach a man to fish and he will eat forever. I.e., you haven't done them any favors in the long term. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you...
Your thread has been archived
Blond chocolateIt seems like you have quite some edits on chocolate, and I wonder, why have you removed blond chocolate from Types_of_chocolate article, on your edit on September 7th? I wanted to respawn it to the article, but I want to discuss it with you before that. I'd like to give you some arguments for Blonde Chocolate as a Type:
Ruby chocolate is considered as a type, not a milk chocolate variant of ruby cocoa. It also satisfies all the above. So why not blond chocolate? I would appreciate your answer. 141.226.144.100 (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
Your GA nomination of Rogue ChocolatierHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rogue Chocolatier you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) History of chocolateHi -- I saw your response to my comments at the FAC. I'd be happy to help at the article talk page, whenever you get time to work on it again. I think my first suggestion would be to sketch out the overall tree of articles that should ultimately exist in order to get a clearer picture of what belongs in this article. I suspect there's enough material in reliable sources for specialized articles such as history of chocolate manufacturing -- after all we do already have history of Cadbury which would be a child article of that. That would imply that history of chocolate would be in summary style, which is tricky if some of the subarticles haven't been written yet. Anyway, I have the article on my watchlist and look forward to seeing what happens to it. ~~ Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Happy Holiday and Merry Christmas!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Merry Christmas!
~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐!~ メリークリスマス!~ 메리 크리스마스! สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành! Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete! Hello, Rollinginhisgrave! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
Your GA nomination of Rogue ChocolatierThe article Rogue Chocolatier you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rogue Chocolatier and Talk:Rogue Chocolatier/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC) DYK for White chocolateOn 3 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article White chocolate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that white chocolate (pictured) has been used as a coating for vitamin products? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/White chocolate. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, White chocolate), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC) Draft:Chocolate in JapanAre you planning to include cocoa production in Japan in that draft of yours? Because if so, then I'll hold off on my intended writeup of that topic. Cheers. Yue🌙 05:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Where you at?I had the impression you were committed to the sorely needed reduction of Donald Trump—and you're probably the only editor with the personality, knowledge, and skills to accomplish that. Haven't seen you in awhile; was I mistaken, or have you had a change of heart? Never mind that you were an asset there in general. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rogue ChocolatierThe article Rogue Chocolatier you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rogue Chocolatier for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC) BludgeonI think you need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
You are very appreciated!Hey Rollinginhisgrave, there was a recent post on Bluesky highlighting your work on chocolate articles. It has more than 6000 likes and a bunch of replies, almost entirely positive. You have been dubbed "chocolate hero"! Thanks for all you do here, chocolate-related and otherwise. P.S. out of curiosity, whose grave does your username refer to? Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
|