Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:
Currently too much of this is a how-to/textbook, and we do not have those, see WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Look at some other pages such as Broyden's method, QM/MM, Anderson acceleration and others. I thnk the whole #SDM Monte-Carlo Algorithm section should be heavily trimmed, perhaps removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Super droplet method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Slayoo!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 13:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Slayoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MPDATA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Latest comment: 2 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Ldm1954, left the following feedback:
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Hi! Thank you for quick reply. I've intended to provide a comment, but the previous conversation was already archived.
In your earlier review, there was a suggestion to entirely remove the algorithm section.
The key change introduced is the renaming of the whole article so that the keyword "algorithm" is in the title.
Moreover, the section on the taxonomy of cloud microphysical models, which was not directly relevant to the algorithm, was moved to the Cloud Physics article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cloud_physics&diff=prev&oldid=1355077412). This way, the scope of the present candidate article is narrowed and the contents better match the (new) title.
There was also a correction in the example implementation addressed, which was spotted in another personal review of the text.
Looking forward to your feedback, thanks for your time.
The Anderson acceleration article - one of the ones you have pointed to - has similar content:
- there is an example implementation provided in MATLAB (here, we use open-source Python),
- there is full definition of the algorithm (here, we define each algorithm step in "Time stepping, candidate pairs and attribute update"),
- there are references to other classes of methods (here, we refer to Smoluchowski equation, as well as bulk- and bin- methods in general),
- a comprehensive selection of literature references is given starting with the original work (also done here).
Concerning the WP:NOTATEXTBOOK:
1. (Instruction manuals and cookbooks) - the provided pseudo-code grade implementation is meant solely for understanding the described algorithm steps; it is not even close to a cookbook as it lacks: parallel processing, multiple-droplet attribute handling, and is neither written in a compiled language nor uses JIT compilation - all of which would be essential to consider it an actually usable implementation.
2. n/a
3. n/a
4. n/a
5. FAQs: no question-answer phrasing is used.
6. Textbooks and annotated texts: Quoting the guidelines: "examples intended to inform rather than instruct may be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia articles".
7. assumption that the reader is well-versed in the topic's field - the text is rich in references to Wikipedia articles on relevant terms, and explains the algorithm in much more verbose manner than what can be found in any of the journal papers on the topic, while stripping the discussion from any technicalities above the minimum needed convey the idea.
8. there is no original research reported here.
IIUC, points 6 and 7 are subjective, and this is where I'd like to ask you for elaboration as per which particular wording/passage contradicts the guidelines.
The article has been renamed to indicate that the scope is the particular algorithm itself, not a method in general.
The discussion on the taxonomy of cloud microphysics models has been moved out to narrow the scope.
I am looking forward to receiving your actionable feedback.
Sorry, that is not how Wikipedia works. You have submitted a draft that does not meet the requirements established by concensus discussions involving thousands of editors. It is your responsibility to rewrite the article. I have already provided you with more guidance than most reviewers would. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
MPDATA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
Getting Started
Tips
Hello, Slayoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MPDATA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
