This is a notice to let you know that I've reported the IP editor seeking Li Jun Li's inclusion in the poster billing on Sinners (2025 film) and committing WP:NPA violations at User talk:Dr vulpes#Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. They've been getting on my nerves. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

No problem. There are some ongoing discussions at Talk:Sinners (2025 film)#Plot summary edits and Talk:Sinners (2025 film)#Edit War Dispute if you are interested. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I don't care what I say, but this film is announced to be produced for television. So I call it a "Nickelodeon Original Film". Just stop the edit war. Okay? Be reliable next time. Akhil K. (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

You be reliable. A Facebook post is not a reliable source. Besides, the film is coming out on Paramount+ first, so it is technically not a "Nickelodeon Original Film." SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

How about coming to Nickelodeon first, then Paramount+. Here's the source: https://deadline.com/2025/05/dora-and-the-search-for-sol-dorado-streaming-premiere-date-1236405074/. Akhil K. (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Then it would premiere on Paramount+ first. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

But still counts as an original film because it also says, "Nickelodeon" and according the article the quote says, "Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado, the latest live-action movie in kids franchise Dora the Explorer, is set to premiere on Paramount+ and Nickelodeon in the U.S. on Wednesday, July 2." Akhil K. (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Well, Good Burger 2 was a Nickelodeon original film, and that uses Nickelodeon Movies. Same with A Really Haunted Loud House. No Time to Spy. The list goes on and on. So keep it as Nickelodeon Movies. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Good Burger 2 is not an original film, but A Really Haunted Loud House and No Time to Spy are. Including other films that are produced for television, if simulcast on Paramount+. Akhil K. (talk) 21:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The point remains. They all used the Nickelodeon Movies logo. That is why it shall remain up. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Lemme explain:

We need a plot summary for the movie. I put that there so that way editors will be encouraged to write a plot summary for the movie. Because frankly, a premise isn't enough. The majority of movies on Wikipedia have plot summaries. HiGuys69420 (talk) 03:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I understand that we need a plot summary. But we don't add that if it's listed under the premise tab. Someone will add a plot eventually.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

the list of pokémon anime characters was actually redirected over this discussion in afd, so that blar wasn't vandalism. thus, to reinstate or recreate it, you'd need to at least address the issues there. at least in my current view, that'd involve finding any sources to establish notability for the cast in general... at all, really consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 20:38, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

M. Billoo 05:55, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reminder, although I have partially changed it back now. Thank you. M. Billoo 01:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Replied, please check. M. Billoo 13:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please check a comment, hope for your response as well. M. Billoo 02:29, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jay Kelly, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please see the section as to why secondary sources are preferred over primary ones. This is for in case you missed my ping. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 02:29, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

• • No, I saw your ping. You make valid points, and I apologize.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your edits have been reverted. Cynthia Erivo is billed first than Ariana Grande and this is supported by numerous reliable sources and should not be changed. If you have an issue with it, discuss it on the page’s talk page. Thank you. Denonia✉ 00:33, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 14:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

We do round the box office total up or down, yes. But that's only for the lead paragraph. We don't round it up or down in the infobox. Multiplivision (talk) 02:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent gross figures are just not constructive. Also, according to MOS:LARGENUM: "Avoid using approximately, about, and similar terms with figures that have merely been approximated or rounded in a normal and expected way" SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 03:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't work that way. We only round if it's over or under 5 in decimals. Multiplivision (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dude, there are decimals. Why do you think I'm rounding up and down? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

You're literally rounding The Bad Guys 2's gross to the nearest whole number (in this case, $240 million), when their worldwide gross is $239.2 million. You're not rounding it up properly. Multiplivision (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm only rounding it up because the amount grown both domestically and internationally are above 5 in the decimal range. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

It does not work that way. Multiplivision (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

How? How does it not work that way? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The worldwide gross for The Bad Guys 2, as of today, is $239,193,810. As per rounding to the nearest number, we round it up to $239.2 million. We don't near it to $240 million. I don't care if the domestic and international grosses round to the nearest number.

This is how it is supposed to be done:

$82,593,605 (domestic) → $82.6 million (rounding to nearest decimal, being 6)

$156,600,205 (international) → $156.6 million (stays the same because there are no numbers exceeding)

$239,193,810 (worldwide) → $239.2 million (rounding to nearest decimal, being 2) Multiplivision (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

In addition, per the lead paragraph, we round it to the nearest whole number, with it being $239 million flat. Multiplivision (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unabom (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Do you have updated sources for the box office? The referenced cites in the text and infobox both link to the $992M figure. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Right here: https://deadline.com/2025/12/box-office-zootopia-2-five-nights-at-freddys-2-ella-mccay-1236647494/ SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:00, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Why did you undo MikeAllen's edit? He said specifically "too soon no reviews are even discussed in article". Also, how come you put "negative" reviews on Scream 7 when Scream 3 received a similar RT score and is credited as having "mixed" reviews? NarutoSan6000 (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

As they usually do. It's borderline disruptive. Mike Allen 22:06, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

How is it too soon to add that the film received negative reviews?

Also, the reason why Scream 3 is mixed and Scream 7 is negative is because of their Metacritic scores, which label them as mixed or negative. 3 has a 56, meaning mixed, while 7 has a 39, meaning negative. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

oh so we just go by the Metacritic consensus in the lead? that should be clarified then. Mike Allen 22:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I mean, that was my thought. I always thought that's how it went, unless I'm misremembering something. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:00, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay, can you put "on metacritic" next to your edit then? That's how you clarify something. Also when you reverted Mike's edit you again forgot to use an edit summary. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 01:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's my bad. I keep doing that. I did put that it was per Metacritic in the arrow. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. NarutoSan6000 (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I suggest you read this:

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Full points (periods) NarutoSan6000 (talk) 08:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The film is currently untitled, it was called Shiver but not anymore, if you read the new article. KingArti (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yep. Just saw that. Let me try and change it back. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Flowervale Street. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 08:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Frankly, I don't care about this because it's going to blow past $170 million worldwide anyway, but... why did you change this back to $170 million when the citation it is using doesn't show that? Further, look at this; shows $168 million. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's Box Office Mojo. Did you check here? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, because at the time that cite hadn't been provided, and the one that was was not in congruence with the provided figures. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:49, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Well, usually we have two sources, The Numbers and Box Office Mojo. Numbers updates daily, while idk BOM's update schedule. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 04:56, 28 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

You know from me putting Miles "Tails" Prower in and on between Amy Rose and Knuckles the Echidna. ~2026-17806-98 (talk) 09:15, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why did you even want to do that in the first place? We have a billing block, and she is not listed in between Bell and Elba. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 25 § Untitled Spider-Man: No Way Home sequel until a consensus is reached. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:46, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

What I meant by "unsourced" was that the citation did not support your removal of production companies, which were all mentioned in the source cited, and addition of John Cohen Productions (which I don't think even exists). Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 16:30, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I thought every company that's listed under "in association with" only helped out with finances and didn't help make the movie at all. Is that not right? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that is true, but that's not the case in this scenario. The source in question is DNEG's page for the film, which listed all of the companies as "production companies" and mentions nothing about financers. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 16:40, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's the thing. What if that website considers financiers production companies by accident? Who's to say that they are actually right in this scenario and not Paramount? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:56, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

That's a good point. Maybe the production companies should be based on multiple sources rather than just one. I'll have a look and try something. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:34, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, that would be preferred, if Paramount's website isn't proof enough SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit has been done. I've only just now noticed that "in association with" was explicitly said in the article despite me having worked on this article since it was a draft in 2024. That's my bad, lol. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 18:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, lol. No worries SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 18:11, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Are you sure about the website? Cause it works fine for me. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh. I realised what I did wrong; I included part of the comment syntax in the link. My mistake once again. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 20:22, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A Little Slice of Hell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, SomeAnotherCastaway. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foster the Snowman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Violent Night 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A unsupported parameter error. References show this error when you use a parameter name that does not exist. Please replace the parameter with one that the template supports, or remove it if no such parameter exists. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • "Dominic Lewis Scoring Tommy Wirkola's 'Violent Night 2'". August 4, 2026. Retrieved August 5, 2026. {{cite web}}: |first= missing |last= (help); Unknown parameter |Last= ignored (|last= suggested) (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply