User talk:SummeRStorM79

Welcome to Wikipedia, SummeRStorM79! Thank you for your contributions. I am HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding these edits, there are several issues. First, you haven't provided a reliable source, and if you need help understanding this concept, please see WP:V and WP:CITE. Second, even if there is a reliable source supporting this material, I'm not sure it needs to be in the Cedar Point article. This article contains a lot of information as it stands now, and what you're trying to add may be better suited at the HalloWeekends article for minor details like this. If you really want it in the Cedar Point article, then I suggest you start a new discussion on the article's talk page. We can discuss it further there. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 06:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cedar Point. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Fast Lane (Cedar Fair) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Maverick, Skyhawk, Gemini and Giant Wheel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I didn't realize I'd added links. That certainly was not my intention. I only wanted to edit the article to reflect the most up-to-date info. Sorry if I caused a problem. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are recently-posted discussions at WikiProject Amusement Parks you may be interested in contributing to, located here: WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion at WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Status field for Amusement Park infoboxes. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Could you explain, please? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 03:02, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your recent edit at Phantom's Revenge, and noticed that you didn't provide a source. I've left it in place for now, but please add a citation. If you need help, see Help:Introduction to referencing or ask at the Teahouse. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Gone. I only saw your message to me about my edit on Phantom's Revenge just now,so please forgive me? I did not intend to itnore you. I just added a citation. I hope it is acceptable. It was from a local news channel in Pittsburgh (I believe KDKA). Do I always need a citation when adding content? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 17:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, please excuse the typos (should be '[just now, so...] & 'ignore') in the message above. I'm usually better at proofreading things before posting. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SummeRStorM79! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reference., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SummeRStorM79! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.

Adog (Talk・Cont) 02:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SummeRStorM79. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!

Note: You recieved this notification because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Harobouri ^{T • C (he/him)} 16:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erich Anderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conundrum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the link. I meant for that to be a link to that episode's page, but apparently I didn't do it correctly. If another editor with more experience can adjust it, that's fine. I'm nearing 1,000 edits, but there are still many aspects of editing that I'm very inexperienced at. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 06:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SummeRStorM79 (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I'm an amusement park/roller coaster lover and I've been working on various articles about them. This project in particular, Operation B&M, has seemingly been abandoned for about a decade now and I'd like to rescue it. I'm finding active users (particularly those with interests in park/coaster articles) who may be interested in helping out. No worries if you aren't interested! Therguy10 (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I would be interested. I'm not sure what needs done here, but I am definitely an amusement park/coaster lover! My home park is Kennywood in West Mifflin, PA, but my most favorite park is Cedar Point!! Unfortunately, I have not been there since late July of 2019, but have been itching for a return trip! Anyhoo, please let me know what this Operation B&M thing entails, ok? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 22:30, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok awesome! Here’s the jist:

The project was to bring every B&M manufactured roller coaster up to “Good Status.” While the project seemed successful in the past, it did became abandoned :(. I’m sure you’d be useful with this considering your love for parks and coasters. In fact, some coasters you may have ridden (ex: Valravn or Rougarou) need the help!

So I’m gathering active editors (you would not believe how many editors on that project are inactive!) that have an interest in this type of stuff to help out! If it is indeed something you’d be interested in, I’d let you know when I have enough editors and the official reviving will start! Therguy10 (talk) 00:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and by the way…..yes, you should totally go back to Cedar Point! :) Therguy10 (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, as far as Cedar Point, I've been trying. The whole virus thing did not help, plus there's the monetary aspect of it. I'm hoping to try for next year. Siren's Curse looks like it'll be pretty neat (I've never ridden a tilt coaster). I've ridden Top Thrill Dragster, just hoping they can fix the issues with Top Thrill 2 to get it running again. Sadly, as for 2024, no coaster rides for me. Very disappointing, because I LOVE coasters of ANY type. My last park visit was late July of 2023 to Kings Island. That was my 2nd time there. Went with a friend, we had a great time. 24 coaster rides! Ok, as for Operation B&M, please keep me in the loop? I'm not sure what I could do to help improve the pages, but I'd be willing! SummeRStorM79 (talk) 01:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that’s so cool! Kings Island is my “home park” and I visit Cedar Point occasionally too! (Maybe one or two visits a year?) Buying the All-Park Passport is well worth it. I’m super curious to see how it changes with the merger with Six Flags, though! But yes you should absolutely go back to CP! (And I’m stoked for Siren’s Curse too….I have also never ridden a tilt)

And I will keep you in the loop for Operation B&M! Hopefully I’ll get back with you about it soon….Thanks! Therguy10 (talk) 01:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I am pleased to inform you that Operation B&M will be ready for a "revival" starting on February 1, 2025. If you have any questions feel free to reach me on my talk page! Therguy10 (talk) 17:36, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the question you left on GoneIn60's talk page. I must inform you that Gone seems to have disappeared in October; he had a regular editing log until then - nothing new since.

Regarding your issue, have you tried undoing or reverting the edits you made? You could also consider restoring the article to the version prior to your edits. Hopefully that helps! Therguy10 (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to do that. Would you be able to help? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll revert those past 2 edits you made.

Also, if you have any editing questions relating to this and other stuff, you can also reach the Help Desk or Teahouse, I'm they could help ya! Therguy10 (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks, please do that. The content that was deleted needs to be restored. The Matt Travis content I added is legit & should stay on the page. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 21:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what all I've done but everything looks back to being stable except for one reference. I'm unsure about the Matt Travis content. Therguy10 (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Matt Travis content is accurate & true. It should've stayed. The article isn't right yet. There are still several names that need to be restored. And the Matt Travis content should be restored as well. He deserves as much recognition as any of the other names on there. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 21:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that I'm not sure if the content is still there; the information looked correct. I need to check in to what happened with the reverting, something isn't right Therguy10 (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quick update: It looks like there was a 3rd revision that I did not initially see. This caused the edit-reverter to suffer edit conflict. This seems to be part of why things are broken and info is missing.

Out of the 3 edits you published, which of those 3 do you want to go back to? I'll get a rollbacker to do so and we can fix the problem then. Therguy10 (talk) 21:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just want everything back to the way it was, but with the Matt Travis content added in. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With the 1st edit (when I added the Matt Travis content), I didn't realize that I was apparently over-writing on existing content. I went back & tried to re-add what was deleted. After that edit, I saw that there was an issue with the Reid Flair link (for his death) & that several names were accidentally deleted. It kind of snowballed into an overwhelming headache of errors. I'm sorry for making such a mess. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SummeRStorM79 No worries - I messed up too!

Here is this version , which was the one before you made any edits. Let me know if this is the right one! Therguy10 (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It obviously has the original issues that you tried to fix, but without all of the snowball effect mistakes I made. Therguy10 (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's right, but can we add in the Matt Travis content without causing any problems? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it will need to be added once the roll back is complete. I'm sorry for causing a headache D: Therguy10 (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. How long does the roll back take? Just wondering, because that page hasn't been edited since you were working with it. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would be whenever the admin sees my request. (In this case, Hey man im josh) He's usually pretty active so if it isn't done by tomorrow I'll try to figure something out

Therguy10 (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A rollback is entirely unnecessary in this case, but I think what you're asking for is to simply revert instead. A rollback is a one quick button that's used for vandalism. Never the less, I restored it to that linked version. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh I probably should've done that but I was too worried I'd mess it up again :/ Thanks so much, though! Therguy10 (talk) 13:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help with this! I added the Matt Travis content back in, but I didn't put a source. 2 days ago when I tried adding that content with a source, it messed alot up. Idk if a more experienced editor can add a source for it? It's going on 5 years since Travis' passing, & his name still hadn't been added to this list. As I mentioned before, he is just as deserving a place on there as any of the other wrestlers who have passed away @ a young age over the years. SummeRStorM79 (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! The revival for Operation B&M has officially started! Since you showed interest in participating, I’ve come to let you know. Thanks!

Therguy10 (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you! Ok, cool. Thanks for letting me know. What can I do to start helping? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a good question! A great place to start could be looking at the start-class and C-class articles for spelling & grammar. This is useful to prepare it for higher class editing. (Ex: B, GA, FA) Therguy10 (talk) 21:36, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]