Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Albirex Niigata Singapore FC. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Reverting a page to an earlier version that is significantly more unsourced & harassment of an editor aren't very constructive behaviors. Riklik1984 (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Sembawang Rangers FC, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jurong_FC&diff=prev&oldid=1358251563

Also vandalised this article Эльдар Шукоров (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 16:39, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]