Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Warsaw, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

Thanks for your contributions. We really appreciate your attempts to change Wikipedia for the better and in making it more appealing visually. However, could you please refrain from spontaneous editing of infoboxes and galleries on Poland's city pages? Most of them do not require any changes, especially the large cities. The collages for Kraków and Warsaw are already well-constructed. Merangs (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@WScnin: - I really do not appreciate you cluttering articles with images. Some edits to galleries (for example with Kraków) are not an improvement, especially that previous images were customised to correspond to one another. I suggest you halt the POV editing of infoboxes per your liking. Merangs (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

In the current arrangement of photos, the middle rows do not align in the same way as in other cities. Additionally, the first photo should be the most representative because it is the one visible in the thumbnail (see London, Berlin, Turin, Prague). I will not make any further changes. WScnin (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

@WScnin: - The alignment of the images can vary between articles and there is no guideline for it, but it is better if the photos are stylistically similar and uniform in one infobox. Ideal pictures are the ones taken on the same day or around the same time. This is exemplified at Berlin article, where the photos are from the evening/early night period. Regarding thumbnail, other photographs are shown first on Google searches so really it is a minor issue. Nonetheless, I would like to thank you for your other contributions and for updating some images in other related pages. I am worried that the number of images in Warsaw is overwhelming, especially in the 'religion' section. Merangs (talk) 14:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply