The Vidarbha movement includes political activities organised by various individuals, organizations and political parties, for creation of a separate state of Vidarbha, within the republic of India, with Nagpur as the capital. The proposed state corresponds to the eastern 11 districts of the state of Maharashtra. It makes up for 31% of area and 21% of population of the present state of Maharashtra. The area is covered by thick tropical forests and is surplus in electricity, minerals, rice and cotton.
Statehood demand
The Vidarbha region is a centrally located area in India and forms eastern part of Maharashtra state. The earliest demand for a separate state of Vidarbha was raised over 100 years ago, prior to the concept of "Samyukta Maharashtra". As a result of which, the Central Provinces legislature passed a unanimous resolution to create a separate state of 'Mahavidarbha' on 1 October 1938 at Nagpur. Some people celebrate 1 October as 'Vidarbha Day'.[1]
Vidarbha State formation does not occur due to West Maharashtra (Mumbai and Pune) political party Rule.
After merging with the state of Maharashtra, there was a repeated demand for separate statehood, driven by economic considerations and citing the growing developmental backlog.
State Reorganization Commission
The Government of India appointed the first State Reorganisation Committee (SRC) under Chairmanship of Fazal Ali on 29 December 1953.
Vidarbhite leaders at that time, like M S Aney and Brijlal Biyani, submitted a memorandum to State Reorganisation Commission (SRC) for a separate Vidarbha State.
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar supported the "One state - One language" principle for the reorganization of states and opposed the "one language - one state" policy. As a result, he advocated for the formation of at least 2 separate states for Marathi-speaking people instead of a single large state of Maharashtra. He believed that one state should have one language, but also acknowledged the possibility of having two or more separate states with the same language based on the need for efficient administration. He specifically favored the creation of a "Vidarbha State" with Nagpur as its capital, arguing that a single government could not effectively administer such a large state as United Maharashtra.[2]
The Fazal Ali SRC, after considering these memoranda and all other related aspects, favoured a separate Vidarbha State with Nagpur as capital in the year 1956.
But Vidarbha was made part of the new state of Maharashtra in 1960 by the central government, favouring the "One language - One state" principle.
Nagpur Pact
The 1953 Nagpur Pact assures equitable development of all the regions of the proposed Marathi State. Most prominent clause of the Nagpur Pact was: one session of Maharashtra state assembly in Nagpur city every year, with minimum six weeks duration, to discuss issues exclusively related to Vidarbha.
Few notable politicians and others, who rejected to sign this 1953 pact were:
Dhananjay Rao Gadgid, Nagpur
D.V.Gokhale, Wardha
Narayanrao Deshmukh Shirala Amravati
JagannathRao Deshmukh Nerpingalai Amravati
Merger with Maharashtra
On 1 May 1960, the Vidarbha state was merged with a newly formed Maharashtra State, under the agreement known as Nagpur Pact.
Post merger developments
Following the merger, the winter assembly session convenes routinely in Nagpur. Notably, the session does not span the full six weeks as stipulated in the "Nagpur Pact". Furthermore, despite its intended focus on Vidarbha-related matters, the session operates akin to a standard Maharashtra state assembly session by addressing a wide array of issues.[citation needed] Allegations of insufficient development in the Vidarbha region within the context of the unified Maharashtra state have sparked renewed appeals for more balanced development across all regions of the state.
Under these circumstances, the Maharashtra Government appointed a committee, to study regional imbalances in Maharashtra. The committee found that:
"The failure to report to the state assembly every year in terms of the Nagpur Agreement, has been a serious lapse on the part of the state Government. If a report had been made to state legislature, as per the Nagpur Agreement, the matter would have received sustained attention. In the circumstances this did not happen."[4]
Former member of parliament from Nagpur, Banawarilal Purohit floated the Vidarbha Rajya Party in 2004, just before the loksabha elections, with a clear agenda of the separate Vidarbha state.
After declaration of the separate Telangana state by central Government on 9 December 2009,[8] all these and more than 65 other organizations have joined, demanding the separate Vidarbha state. This umbrella group is known as Vidarbha Rajya Sangram Samitee.[9]
The educated middle class in West Vidarbha (Amravati administrative division) says that the concept of a separate Vidarbha is in fact a ploy of Hindi speakers from North-Central India and traders from Gujarati, Marwadi and Jain community. While former want greater access to political power the latter wants to cultivate economic interests.
Vidarbha Bureaucrat says that western area is distributed by party like Nashik MNS, Pune NCP, Mumbai Shiv sena but that Vidarbha is orphan.[citation needed]
Timeline
Advocate general of Maharashtra government Mr Shrihari Aney resigned from his position 23 March 2016. He did so, to be able to support separate Vidarbha movement full-time and wholeheartedly.[1]
Vidarbha Maza, the new political party floated by Rajkumar Tirpude, son of Maharashtra's first deputy chief minister late Nashikrao Tirpude, is ready to contest elections starting from those for municipal councils in the region.[14]
