Why Intelligent Design Fails

Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism
AuthorMatt Young and Taner Edis
LanguageEnglish
SubjectIntelligent design
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherRutgers University Press
Publication dateJune 25, 2004
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover)
Pages238
ISBN081353433X
OCLC53038740
LC ClassBL240.3

Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism is a 2004 anthology edited by physicists Matt Young and Taner Edis. It was published on June 25 by Rutgers University Press.

Contents

According to the publisher, "Why Intelligent Design Fails assembles a team of physicists, biologists, computer scientists, mathematicians, and archaeologists to examine intelligent design from a scientific perspective. Contributors take intelligent design's two most famous claims - irreducible complexity and information-based arguments - and show that neither challenges Darwinian evolution."[1]

Reception

Massimo Pigliucci said in Evolution that the book is a "good extended treatment" of the subject and that "[a]ll in all, the [book] ought to be a vade mecum [guidebook] for graduate students and colleagues who are serious about understanding ID...."[2]

Arthur Falk, of Western Michigan University, said, "Not only is the books largely successful, but several articles provide interesting updates of evolution science for nonprofessionals, quite apart from this debate.... Teachers of science, even at the high school level, will enjoy using Gishlick's do-it-yourself demonstration of the mechanics of flight, starting with an uncooked chicken.... I found myself skeptical of the two articles that deal with the creationists' exploitation of physics -- in particular, the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the problem of the "fine tuning" of physical constants."[3]

Mike Holderness noted in New Scientist, "Each of the 13 chapters of Why Intelligent Design Fails is a patient and clear specialist rebuttal of [relevant claims], in fields from molecular biology to the philosophy of science. It is an essential tool for anyone inclined to resist the wedge."[4]

References

  1. ^ "Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism". WorldCat. OCLC. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
  2. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2005). "More Than You Ever Wanted to Know about Intelligent Design". Evolution. 59 (12): 2717–2720. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
  3. ^ Falk, Arthur (September 2005). "Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 80 (3): 350. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
  4. ^ Holderness, Mike (17 July 2004). "Ex Nihilo". New Scientist. Retrieved 16 August 2026.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.