Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, JavaScript Edition
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Liz Read! Talk! 11:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, JavaScript Edition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The book is notable only in its relation to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Two out of three sources (1 and 3) are primary, source 2 does not mention the book (source is from 2011, and the book is from 2022). It maybe notable enough for ~2 sentences in the SICP article. Artem.G (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Computing. Artem.G (talk) 10:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs This book is an adaption of the original book that is the subject of the article I have linked to. No need for a separate article — Iadmc♫talk 11:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: While there are book reviews (This one in an online journal) [1], I'm not sure this would pass notability for books. Oaktree b (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Even if we had more sources about this edition specifically (this has some usable material, for example), it just wouldn't make sense to give it a separate page. XOR'easter (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.