ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

beliefs of the wider world. Shortcuts WP:PROPORTIONWP:PROPORTION WP:BALASPWP:BALASP WP:ASPECTWP:ASPECT An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects...

23:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Delete Is a WP:BLP1E WP:COATRACK that is WP:BALASPS violating WP:BLP (better explained by John Pack Lambert). -- Green Cardamom...

is that the text violates WP:NPOV. Specifically, it violates WP:DUE, WP:BALASP, and WP:GEVAL. WP:DUE says Undue weight can be given in several ways, including...

side-topic – don't let the side-topic take over the main topic as a WP:BALASPS consideration. Such shifts have often occurred. For example, a person born...

been shown as sources haven't been located, and we do need to factor in WP:BALASP/WP:WEIGHT when merging. If we don't have sources for this content, is it...

sources are found I wonder how a balanced article would look in light of WP:BALASPS. Feedback requested from AFD regulars. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:06, 11...

a way that could be perceived as promotional, that may be undue per WP:BALASPS or WP:NOTPROMOTION. On the other hand, Wayne Rhodes, the first-team All-SEC...

the amount and presentation (or: weight) of criticism in an article: WP:BALASPS: the weight a Wikipedia article gives to criticism of its subject should...

Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Delete I would add that WP:BALASP and WP:PROPORTION are unmet, as the article focuses on several areas of...

much content that would be worth bringing over (especially owing to WP:BALASP), so if there is any merge it should be careful to not import too much material...

observe policies and guidelines such as WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:TRIVIA and WP:BALASPS. In general, recordings are included in a Discography section of the article...

inclusion in any encyclopedia article, and gets cited when WP:DUE or WP:BALASP would be more relevant. Additionally, it gets (mis)cited to claim that subjects...

significant coverage in reliable sources. I think a merge is inappropriate per WP:BALASP, as a merge would give far too much weight to this subsidiary; there's already...

Dream Focus 19:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Delete Appears to violate WP:BALASP. There has been enormous coverage of Donald Trump, and the published material...

unreasonable, but I'm not convinced that this section should exist anyway per WP:BALASP. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:24, 13 August 2025 (UTC) Redirect to...

this particular subsidiary would have been a minor aspect of SHK per WP:BALASP. This is not relevant to the length of the SHK article. For the same reasons...

non-independent source, according to WP:BALASP. I'm not asking about other policies, I'm asking about what BALASP says. It seems to be a common occurrence...

be about the station in general, not just about the bus station. Per WP:BALASPS the article needs to be balanced "with a weight appropriate to the weight...

keep. Where is the History? Financials? Transactions? This entry fails WP:BALASP. And we are talking about Foremost Group, not Elaine Chao.--AhmedFaizP (talk)...

August 2017 (UTC) Comment @Timtempleton: That very Wikipedia page says: "WP:BALASPS: "the weight a Wikipedia article gives to criticism of its subject should...

or keeping the redirect and forcing a mentions, means running into WP:BALASP issues given the lack of any follow up coverage. (Even looked at google...

helpful for its local purpose). So we should go to the policy: say WP:POV, WP:BALASP. Also, cherrypicked quotes from doc (or policy) should be treated with care...

if all of the above named parties did come to an agreement about how WP:BALASPS applies to the subject, the flood of SPAs into the page whinging about...

accusations. In essence, we are seeing a conflict between WP:BALANCE and WP:BALASPS. I am hopeful that through further discussion we can settle this without...

Probably. better to let the independent source (with consideration of BALASP and DUE) do the talking and leave the megaphone at home! NicoR8 (talk) 23:23...

as a group. A summary of destinations at the parent page would be fine BALASP, but doesn't require merging. JoelleJay (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)...

amicable solution to Scottperry's actual problem (which is not with the WP:BALASPS section he keeps reverting to a version before a new consensus was established...

swept under the Republican rug. No anschluss with Young Republicans per WP:BALASP, since it is about twice as lengthy as that article. Clarityfiend (talk)...

that we have uncovered a possible conflict between the WP:BALANCE and WP:BALASPS guidelines. Based on the guidelines I honestly believe we both had at least...

that WP:BALASP matters, and much of the content pertinent to the individual storm would not be pertinent in an article on the season because BALASP alters...

and persevered with adding content contravening UNDUE, NOTNEWS and WP:BALASPS despite lengthy discussions on the talk page demonstrating consensus that...

userTaivolinguist WP:GOODFAITH WP:DIS WP:ETIQ WP:DONTBITE WP:STRUCTURE WP:UNDUE WP:BALASPS WP:IMPARTIAL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okurogluselo (talk...

secondary sources haven't covered an aspect of something, there might be a WP:BALASP issue if primary sources are overused. Here, 18 out of the 116 (or ~16%...

refused medical attention at hospital 3 times as stated in the article; WP:BALASPS" 17:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC) "Chief medical examiner's scientific opinion...

policies in this matter, including WP:Summary style, WP:Page size and WP:BALASPS, as explained below, are quite clearly indicating a split here, and that...

that were true (and I don't think it is, Aircorn has not even mentioned BALASPS), being right is not an excuse for violation 3RR. Jeppiz (talk) 08:42,...

to a further block, a well authored Admin. commentary referring to WP:BALASPS and WP:COATRACK might be useful. Leaky Caldron 09:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)...

edits that is begin ignored like WP:BROADCONCEPT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:UNDUE, WP:BALASPS and WP:QUOTEFARM. As I have said to Malik Shabazz " I do blame myself for...

secondary sources haven't covered an aspect of something, there might be a WP:BALASP issue if primary sources are overused. Here, 18 out of the 116 (or ~16%...

of wiki policies and guidelines, eg WP:RECENTISM, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:BALASPS. sydney has seen many controversial laws implemented over its 200+ year...

has happened, but it doesn't look good. I have pointed them towards WP:BALASPS, but this does not seem to have stopped the behaviour. Unfortunately what...

policy and guidance (WP:consensus, especially, and also WP:undue and WP:BALASPS and the "discuss" of WP:BRD) and then shoves the rest in people's faces...

difference I see is the issue of WP:BALASP: in fact I supported excluding another controversy from the Biden article per WP:BALASP, and I already explained that...

subpages) Apparent violation of WP:PROMOTION, WP:ADV, WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, and WP:BALASPS. Prager University is a website that publishes short videos of speeches...

relevant reliable sources, thus the current version of the article fails WP:BALASPS miserably, and so we're back at "FAs are held to the current standards...

20 September 2024 (UTC) I would oppose merging as such content is not BALASP -- merely being verifiable does not mean something is due in a page, and...

outdated; or they themselves violate WP:IMPARTIAL. Safehaven86 also ignores WP:BALASP. But again... It's also worth noting that Safehaven86 edit-warred at the...

treatment in the body of reliable, published material on the subject (WP:BALASP). We as editors do not get to decide something is part of the authoritarian...

he should not be banned, but you can help to balance his article per WP:BALASPS. Do you think that the writers of all biased material should be banned...

not have created or reinserted such unbalanced negativity or thrown WP:BALASPS out the window. Now I will defer to the community since I think there is...

NOENG has us preferring English when available at the same quality and of BALASP as the sources selected do not reflect the wider world-wide scholarly consensus)...

considerably unbalanced by said users "reliably sourced edits". See WP:NPOV WP:BALASPS WP:UNDUE Instead suggest that Administrators monitor the unbalanced and...

push back on the off-hand dismissal of the applicability of WP:DUE. WP:BALASP, which is a subsection of WP:DUE, notes that An article should not give...

talk page contributions along the lines of policies like WP:WEIGHT and WP:BALASP, as I think he also demonstrates here. I see no serious issue with an editor...

had been in the article for months, were removed. That content added WP:BALASPS to the article and answered two questions a Wikipedia might ask: Why was...

add gun-control content, it is in an effort to achieve NPOV through WP:BALASPS. I hope you will reconsider your proposal, and please feel free to ask...

source; also see WP:V, WP:NPF, WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:UNDUE, WP:BLPSTYLE, WP:BALASP, WP:PROPORTION, WP:BLPPRIMARY. Bezeq2 (talk) 14:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)...

summary with link to Main should be sufficient. This is a discussion of WP:BALASP and WP:PROPORTION specific to this article, and has apparently been going...

allegations to justify excluding them from Wikipedia on the grounds of WP:BALASP, as, in my opinion, WP:V applied and WP:RS was satisfied. When the RfC began...

allegations to justify excluding them from Wikipedia on the grounds of WP:BALASP, as, in my opinion, WP:V applied and WP:RS was satisfied. When the RfC began...

TED video lectures. Per WP:PROMOTION, WP:ADV, WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, and WP:BALASPS. If a mention of the subject's TED or Prager University video lectures...

things in the perspective apparent from available sources (sort of a WP:BALASPS reasoning in the background of my mind I suppose); framing it as a "pseudoscience"...

non-independent source, according to WP:BALASP. I'm not asking about other policies, I'm asking about what BALASP says. It seems to be a common occurrence...

information that does not fit in the Yorick article (for example, because of WP:BALASP) or the Hamlet article, or any one other article, and should be kept as...

oggcast is no longer mentioned in the article (nor should it be, per WP:BALASP), so this isn't a great redirect. Redirecting to Ogg would probably be better...

on only one aspect of the subject (potentially creating WP:UNDUE or WP:BALASP problems); which is a problem with only one cure, namely introducing more...

paragraph). Seems like what you're looking for is the combination of WP:BALASPS with WP:GNG: If UNESCO is the only possible source for the "science and...

problem is that the text violates WP:NPOV. Specifically, it violates DUE, WP:BALASP, and WP:GEVAL. WP:DUE says Undue weight can be given in several ways, including...

to the allegation by the body of reliable sources on the subject (see WP:BALASP). The rest of Reade's biography is not suitable for its own article." Zloyvolsheb...

WP:V/WP:NOR reasons (WP:CALC notwithstanding), but for WP:NPOV (in particular WP:BALASP) reasons: we can extract basically limitless statistical information from...

coverage of different aspects of the same topic per WP:WEIGHT (especially WP:BALASP). The controversy described in Lochtegate is an aspect of either Ryan Lochte...

2013 (UTC) Re environmental impact section: The relevant policy is WP:BALASPS (part of WP:NPOV). The examples given there are "discussion of isolated...

rules that guide us are the usual ones, including WP:DUE, WP:BALANCE and WP:BALASP -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC) Closing note: This removal...

establish the central importance of substantial equivalence (WP:NEUTRAL>WP:BALASPS). A factually accurate and NEUTRAL GM food safety summary should make two...

primary/non-independent sources, leading to issues with WP:OR, WP:WEIGHT, and WP:BALASP, all part of the GA criteria. Pinging discussion participants @JoelleJay...

content. George Ho (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Neither WP:DUE nor WP:BALASP say anything about editors' interpretations, so no, it won't do. AstonishingTunesAdmirer...

Georgia, Mhorg turned into "ethnic Georgians"), and defiantly ignored WP:BALASP. Such things in articles about a living person is pretty bad, so when I...

unsigned comment added by J0eg0d (talk • contribs) 07:05, 21 May 2015 WP:BALASPS / WP:VALID we do not strive for a "balanced" narrative. we strive for a...

November 2016 (UTC) (edit conflict) MOS:SELFREF, MOS:CURRENT, and probably WP:BALASP section of WP:NPOV. Though using "As of (date)" instead of "At present"...

arguments presented in terms of policy (of which it seems that WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASPS are perhaps the most significant in this case) will be considered by the...

think the first is clearer, but if you think the second is required by WP:BALASPS, as Kingofaces does, you must be accepting that there is an effective RS...

doesn't offer much stopping power for anything other than small game. The WP:BALASP policy states "An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects...

Dream Focus 19:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Delete Appears to violate WP:BALASP. There has been enormous coverage of Donald Trump, and the published material...

coverage of different aspects of the same topic per WP:WEIGHT (especially WP:BALASP). The controversy described in Lochtegate is an aspect of either Ryan Lochte...

WP:V/WP:NOR reasons (WP:CALC notwithstanding), but for WP:NPOV (in particular WP:BALASP) reasons: we can extract basically limitless statistical information from...

of these necessarily requires encyclopedic coverage per WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASPS when put in context with her entire career (recentism as well as sensationalism...

cherry-picking or showcasing in a disproportionate manner (WP:ADVOCACY, WP:BALASP). The article was previously discussed at BLPN, touching on some similar...

policy and guidelines. Vivekachudamani have you actually read WP:UNDUE , WP:BALASPS, WP:VALID? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)...

sources are found I wonder how a balanced article would look in light of WP:BALASPS. Feedback requested from AFD regulars. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:06, 11...

materials which means there coverage in that article should be brief per WP:BALASP. I know this is not the desired outcome by editors who have an interest...

disrespect of WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:V:, or bluntly violating WP:UNDUE, WP:BALASP, WP:GEVAL. The main instrument in feigning credibility seems to consist...

to the allegation by the body of reliable sources on the subject (see WP:BALASP). The rest of Reade's biography is not suitable for its own article." Zloyvolsheb...

Others think the draft devotes too much attention to certain claims for WP:BALASPS, and that view can at least be engaged. I've started a parallel discussion...

Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Delete I would add that WP:BALASP and WP:PROPORTION are unmet, as the article focuses on several areas of...

19:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC) The relevant policy is WP:BALANCED and WP:BALASP. Ruslik_Zero 19:51, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Many Wikipedia articles have...

a way that could be perceived as promotional, that may be undue per WP:BALASPS or WP:NOTPROMOTION. On the other hand, Wayne Rhodes, the first-team All-SEC...

August 2017 (UTC) Comment @Timtempleton: That very Wikipedia page says: "WP:BALASPS: "the weight a Wikipedia article gives to criticism of its subject should...

be about the station in general, not just about the bus station. Per WP:BALASPS the article needs to be balanced "with a weight appropriate to the weight...

to be one-sided and defamatory statements (WP:YESPOV, WP:IMPARTIAL, WP:BALASPS), written by authors I believe had anti-GMO, anti-biotech agendas. I felt...

this particular subsidiary would have been a minor aspect of SHK per WP:BALASP. This is not relevant to the length of the SHK article. For the same reasons...

encyclopedic, so I would object to a merge. If any given destination is actually BALASP then it can be discussed in the main article, but nothing in this list is...

apply. Thanks, userdude 04:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC) UserDude, does WP:BALASP work? Usedtobecool TALK ✨ 05:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Thanks, that's great...

think the first is clearer, but if you think the second is required by WP:BALASPS, as Kingofaces does, you must be accepting that there is an effective RS...

disrespect of WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:V:, or bluntly violating WP:UNDUE, WP:BALASP, WP:GEVAL. The main instrument in feigning credibility seems to consist...

much content that would be worth bringing over (especially owing to WP:BALASP), so if there is any merge it should be careful to not import too much material...

23:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Delete Is a WP:BLP1E WP:COATRACK that is WP:BALASPS violating WP:BLP (better explained by John Pack Lambert). -- Green Cardamom...

article mentions only his nationality? The big takeaway from the policy WP:BALASP is An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects of its subject...

encyclopedic entry, but not to the killing. It would also introduce WP:NPOV/WP:BALASP concerns in providing a full biography for one of the main parties but not...

keep. Where is the History? Financials? Transactions? This entry fails WP:BALASP. And we are talking about Foremost Group, not Elaine Chao.--AhmedFaizP (talk)...

whatever it is). (Kudos to TKD for finding the most relevant policy: WP:BALASPS.) —Ben Kovitz (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC) It depends a lot on context...

As for due weight, that is supposed to be determined by sources per WP:BALASP. The comment made headlines and continues to do so. That is why to ignore...

arguments presented in terms of policy (of which it seems that WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASPS are perhaps the most significant in this case) will be considered by the...

even if you only present archaic requirements in a table, it meets WP:BALASPS: "...strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance...

08:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC) I think this is more of a question of WP:BALASP than WP:RS (which this is).Icewhiz (talk) 08:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)...

org as long as (1) it appears to be noteworthy and does not violate WP:BALASPS and (2) the coverage as a whole does not rely primarily on any combination...

(talk) 10:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Another way to look at it is that, per WP:BALASP, part of the due weight section of the NPOV policy, articles should strive...

current infobox covers were published. In accordance to WP:DUE and WP:BALASPS however, there would be no weight on the original German release, which...

the encylopaedia. We do not need to create a false balance here (see WP:BALASPS). RGloucester — ☎ 13:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC) There was a violent overthrow...

January 2025 (UTC) What would the table and prose be sourced to to qualify as BALASP? We have no coverage of "5-wicket hauls" as a topic, so how would we justify...

problem of WP:DUE and WP:BALASP. Incorporate the information alongside every other part of the history, and remove any WP:BALASP violations. Not opposed...

death WP:NOT#NEWS, with There is no deadline WP:RECENTISM WP:EXCEPTIONAL WP:BALASP WP:Neutral point of view, especially key Is there anything else? When there...

would probably get published in something more weighty than a blog. See WP:BALASPS. —Ben Kovitz (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC) DeLong's blog is posted...

removed from the plaque because they consider it "tabloidey" or, citing WP:BALASPS or WP:UNDUE, that too much of the article would then be focused on this...

variants that are in the article. Another argument says that WP:DUE and WP:BALASPS actually prohibit any mention of the shooting. I think that a notable crime...

account of a single historian's refutation POV is WP:UNDUE and contravenes WP:BALASP. The historian in question is already well represented in the content. --Iryna...

directly from official sites. This extra info on athletes further fails BALASP as it is not proportional to the weight given to that info in published...

rules that guide us are the usual ones, including WP:DUE, WP:BALANCE and WP:BALASP -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC) Closing note: This removal...

(talk) 18:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC) The relevant policy point would be WP:BALASP: significance is determined by weighing the sources talking about one aspect...

reliable for that material and (b) that material meets both DUE and WP:BALASP for that Wikipedia article. What is the difference in valid use between...

frame things as they are seen by the mainstream academics in the area WP:BALASPS / WP:VALID / WP:FRINGE. the tendentious editing has now spread beyond just...

sources is certainly appropriate, while being mindful of WP:BLPVIO and WP:BALASP policies. Good luck with that! — JFG talk 15:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC) At...

16:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC) Support the removal of the section, for WP:BALASP reasons, given the limited, and unsustained, coverage. I don't, however...

basically no other sources talk about that particular opinion (WP:WEIGHT/WP:BALASP). On a separate note, the fact that google news indexes a website is not...

event committed sexual assault, which would violate WP:BLPCRIME and WP:BALASP. Also, besides the lede, the only prose in the article that is actually...

each aspect with a weight appropriate to the weight of that aspect" (WP:BALASPS), the tweets and only two surveys quite biased sources, and breaking (especially...

does not have significance to the article topic and irrelevant as per WP:BALASP. No RS, tying Tigtanakert to the history of the Agdam is available. There...

describing the subject explain his child porn conviction might be a WP:BALASPS/WP:UNDUE problem. Wanted to get some additional feedback on this. Swarm...

reviews, as an earlier version of the article from about a year ago does. WP:BALASP indicates that this minor issue should not get too much ink -- the simple...

listed. If it's difficult to do that in the main article because of WP:BALASP or WP:RECENT, the sub-article makes sense. But then the sub-article needs...

of text on article talk page However, user has not taken WP:NOPV and WP:BALASP into consideration and has also made more insertion in discussed text. It...

int'l authorities, etc. Finally, the shortness of the article creates WP:BALASP concerns because so much is tied to corruption. GreatCaesarsGhost 11:09...

level of detail in all sections. Refer to guidelines WP:SUMMARY STYLE, WP:BALASP, and WP:SUBARTICLE. Summary: This is not an obstacle to FA status ... I'm...

take up less of my time!User1956a (talk) (restart indent) According to WP:BALASP, "An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects of its subject...

item for discussion on WP:SOURCES, WP:QS, WP:EXCEPTIONAL, WP:BALANCE, WP:BALASPS WP:RS "Question for administrator Regarding CIFS quote violation of multiple...

it's WP:VER, and article content stemming from cited material meets WP:BALASP, there really is very little more to say on the matter that doesn't stink...

the argument was conveniently changed to WP:UNDUE, and later on to WP:BALASPS. But the fact remains that the NJT authority's actions and policies are...

was inappropriate for documenting the subject of that article. Per WP:BALASPS, Discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject...

with some sport-specific treatments of winning streaks addressed when BALASP. Lists of winning streaks should be in separate list articles by sport and...

the article subject's history, and hence I think is unsuitable as per WP:BALASPS; second, it is not worded in a neutral way; and third, I have a general...

“an outright lie.” “All significant viewpoints” need to be represented.WP:BALASP 2) The current lead is also not enough representative summary of Oppenheim's...

I'd argue keeping the biography in the event article are WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASP concerns: certainly some discussion of the alleged killer is relevant in...

and 20% disjoint quotes on isolated performances -- how can we capture BALASP if separate pieces of information have not been independently contextualized...

2013 (UTC) Re environmental impact section: The relevant policy is WP:BALASPS (part of WP:NPOV). The examples given there are "discussion of isolated...

a BLP, the Littman article has major WP:NPOV issues of balance under WP:BALASP and WP:NOTNEWS. Its content is primarily about one study she published,...

her bio. Nblund talk 00:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC) (It'a not WP:DUE but WP:BALASP which applies. One covers opinion while the other covers facts, although...

current infobox covers were published. In accordance to WP:DUE and WP:BALASPS however, there would be no weight on the original German release, which...

into a COATRACK that dwarfs material about Reid's career. But, from WP:BALASP, "An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects of its subject...

(UTC) I would consider the whole of the section at WP:DUE, particularly WP:BALASPS; and the essay WP:COATRACK. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 01:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)...

"depth and prominence" for different facts in article is covered by WP:BALASP, but that policy covers "discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news...

pick it up from here. I take it you are implicitly referring to the WP:BALASP subsection of WP:UNDUE. Is that correct? I appreciate that you are "not...

Early discussion In addition to WP:DUE, WP:BALASP and WP:EXCEPTIONAL may also apply. EXCEPTIONAL says, "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality...

relevant reliable sources, thus the current version of the article fails WP:BALASPS miserably, and so we're back at "FAs are held to the current standards...

specifically WP:PROMOTION, WP:ADV, WP:ELPOV, WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, and WP:BALASPS. I could certainly see a Prager U lecture being cited as a primary source...

"destination tables should only be included when supported by SIRS and BALASP". The RfC is treating this as essentially a "MoS for airport articles" issue...

that a sample of his broadcast was used in a TV mini-series seems non-BALASP). I think it's plenty good enough now. GCG (talk) 19:35, 14 January 2018...

April 2014 (UTC) The Gallup poll info was added on 31 March 2014 for WP:BALASPS.[31] The sentence/paragraph in question has been reworded since then, but...

included. Even if a reliable secondary source can be found, WP:REDFLAG and WP:BALASP would favor exclusion, unless it was routinely mentioned in detailed accounts...

because I think Wikipedia's norms around this implicitly contradict WP:BALASP. - RIHG The tenses in "stipulated that considerable structural work must...

the encylopaedia. We do not need to create a false balance here (see WP:BALASPS). RGloucester — ☎ 13:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC) There was a violent overthrow...

should be Bopomofo and Wade-Giles in the template without considering WP:BALASP. This leads me to believe they are advocating for equal status of the various...

Roswell UFO incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Did you know that if we simply state that what crashed in...

consider whether the content is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia per WP:BALASPS in light of the high volume of non-investigative content it publishes....

about Benjamin, not Phillips and This level of detail is unbalanced, per WP:BALASP, and off-topic. We're well in the weeds if we're documenting every tweet...

as subsection of "Reception and Influence" – I'd shorten that: per WP:BALASPS it seems to give more weight to the gender/sexuality aspect in reception...

encyclopedic entry, but not to the killing. It would also introduce WP:NPOV/WP:BALASP concerns in providing a full biography for one of the main parties but not...

covered by SYNTH is not ubiquitous. Regarding NPOV/Balancing aspects (WP:BALASP), that can only be decided in the context of a whole article - I don't think...

separate sections for separate theories is a recipe for WP:GEVAL and WP:BALASPS. One needs to give adequate weight to each theory, in line with what reliable...

told when pointed to policies (in this case primarily WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASPS), or not wanting to understand what they're being told. Just like on SIG...

article, it also needs trimming the allegation-by-allegation detail per BALASP. Much of section appears to be drawn from single Reporter-Herald article...

better source would be preferable. I've removed the YouTube link, but on WP:BALASP grounds rather than reliability. That some random YouTuber made a video...

requirement for secondary independent RS demonstrating that such info is BALASP. Enforce the policy requirement that articles (and large swathes of articles)...

whatsoever in the NYT article) does not necessarily make it BALASP. Something actually being BALASP for a page does not mean it should be in the infobox. And...

you check the footnote in the proposal, the second wikilink is to the WP:BALASP part of NPOV. We already have a consensus from the previous RfC (see the...

Antisemitism during the Gaza war (where problems with the article are chiefly WP:BALASP-related). The majority of the body of the article is series of paragraphs...

appropriate procedure to address, as delicately as possible, a question re WP:BALASP and WP:PROPORTION on the Bon Secours Sisters page. The material in dispute...

will indeed violate WP:NPOV. So, In accordance with WP:NPOV, WP:DUE, WP:BALASPS and WP:RS, I am against the inclusion of an cropped part of an interview...

Just because there is criticism doesn't mean it warrants inclusion, (WP:BALASP:"For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports...

topics that can be used for inclusion in the biographical article, per WP:BALASPS. User:Sfarney (signing as "Grammar'sLittleHelper") was aware of the fairly...

been shown as sources haven't been located, and we do need to factor in WP:BALASP/WP:WEIGHT when merging. If we don't have sources for this content, is it...

understand what RS means, or what is secondary or independent, or the concept of BALASP; a company's wiki page will certainly have a "knowledge gap" that is filled...

is appropriately WP:DUE and reflects the sort of balance required by WP:BALASP - which can sometimes be hard to establish when people are cramming a bunch...

(talk) 10:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Another way to look at it is that, per WP:BALASP, part of the due weight section of the NPOV policy, articles should strive...

that might have intended to be a reference to WP:BALASP? People often conflate WP:DUE and WP:BALASP - I’m not actually sure why they are distinct, it...

primary/non-independent sources, leading to issues with WP:OR, WP:WEIGHT, and WP:BALASP, all part of the GA criteria. Pinging discussion participants @JoelleJay...

should be included per BALASP. We have a new editor who read the article and felt that the content in question, in effect, failed BALASP and BLP concerns (my...

the source is reliable, but over if including the information follows WP:BALASP. WP:VNOT is relevant here: "While information must be verifiable for inclusion...

something is relevant to the article isn't a reliability issue, see WP:BALASP (is Lineups ranking something worth including). -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested...

connection between GHM and Fatah. Should we also mention Fatah too? Per BALASP, we should treat the aspect that is the connection with Fatah with a weight...

swept under the Republican rug. No anschluss with Young Republicans per WP:BALASP, since it is about twice as lengthy as that article. Clarityfiend (talk)...

positions, they are a matter of NPOV not reliability, see WP:DUE and WP:BALASP. Because something can be verified doesn't necessitate it's inclusion, rather...

would be able to distinguish it from novel ideas. If a concept is actually BALASP for understanding an article topic, why would it only be published in blogs/preprints...

sources have reported on it then it might be best to not include it (WP:BALASP). If it has been reported on in other reliable secondary sources that explain...

opinion should be included isn't a reliability matter. As WP:DUE and WP:BALASP are part of WP:NPOV. For reference see also recent attempted changes to...

as secondary sources don't show it's an important detail of her life (WP:BALASP/WP:HTRIV). -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 13:47, 13 October 2025...

that WP:BALASP matters, and much of the content pertinent to the individual storm would not be pertinent in an article on the season because BALASP alters...

would think it undue, but that's not a reliability issue as WP:DUE / WP:BALASP are part of WP:NPOV. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 22:36, 11 February...

characteristic of the biography. This appears to conflict with WP:LEAD, WP:UNDUE, WP:BALASP, and WP:BLP. Policy concerns - WP:LEAD – The introduction should summarize...

theorist" in a lead or a 20,000 byte "controversies" section that would make WP:BALASP cry (the latter being something that's permeated the project well beyond...

on that concept in the policy. There is a lot of distinctions, BALANCE, BALASP, etc. but the fundamental difficulty remains: how to evaluate the weight...

they actually mean "BALASP". LightNightLights (talk • contribs) 11:11, 11 September 2025 (UTC) Until sometime last year, IIRC, WP:BALASP was a subsection...

weighing his testimony with all the other sources and details (WP:DUE/WP:BALASP). Such matters are part of WP:NPOV and are beyond the scope of this noticeboard...

and not SYNTH, I don't think there is ever a situation where it would be BALASP to include in an article. JoelleJay (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)...

general opinion, sounds like the kind of detail that could be excluded per WP:BALASP. Ultimately it would be something to discuss on the articles talk page....

I'd argue keeping the biography in the event article are WP:UNDUE and WP:BALASP concerns: certainly some discussion of the alleged killer is relevant in...

problem of WP:DUE and WP:BALASP. Incorporate the information alongside every other part of the history, and remove any WP:BALASP violations. Not opposed...

research papers, it certainly should not have its own article and likely isn't BALASP anywhere else either. JoelleJay (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) I believe...

rather that it's effectively an indiscriminate database, so useless for WP:BALASP purposes. Someone else has to cover these liveries to prove they merit mention...

zealotry. This only serves to facilitate violations of WP:IMPARTIAL and WP:BALASP through heavy insertion of negative-toned content. There is nothing at WP:FRINGE/N...

chairman of Winnipeg Downtown Biz so it should probably be left out per WP:BALASP (having said that the Globe and Mail mention it in one an article I found...

lighting poll failed may be undue (but that's not a reliability issue, see WP:BALASP). -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 17:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC) There...

them or de-emphasize or omit some facts that are unimportant to them. WP:BALASP only says we should strive to treat each aspect with a weight proportional...

And even info that would be nominally acceptable through WP:CALC is not BALASP if you're making a whole table column out of calculations not present in...

This especially becomes an issue on whether a given detail is actually BALASP if the only source reporting it is an official government record (which...

doesn't effect reliability, and yet not due inclusion because of his bias (WP:BALASP). As an example he could reliably report an incident, even if he frames...

20 September 2024 (UTC) I would oppose merging as such content is not BALASP -- merely being verifiable does not mean something is due in a page, and...

2026 (UTC) I contest that my will and want to enforce WP:IMPARTIAL and WP:BALASP is equivalent to that of three standard editors. So that's three people...

reliable, but whether some is pertinent for inclusion is a matter of WP:DUE/WP:BALASP. e.g. will the article be neutral with or without Ashley's opinions and...

(UTC) If an award isn't covered by secondary independent sources, how is it BALASP on the page? JoelleJay (talk) 02:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC) exactly. Had it...

encyclopedic, so I would object to a merge. If any given destination is actually BALASP then it can be discussed in the main article, but nothing in this list is...

as a group. A summary of destinations at the parent page would be fine BALASP, but doesn't require merging. JoelleJay (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)...

facts right, and we can avoid citing it for analysis, but an application of BALASP can convey a message which reliability is a relevant consideration for:...

used to confirm whether something meets the requirements of WP:DUE and WP:BALASP. If a fact can only be cited to a primary source, there's a very good chance...

January 2025 (UTC) What would the table and prose be sourced to to qualify as BALASP? We have no coverage of "5-wicket hauls" as a topic, so how would we justify...

that is not relevant to the article/article section has low weight (or BALASP). When the material is removed the justification should be something like...

20:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC) It's not how you work? It's called WP:DUE and WP:BALASP. It's not optional. DeCausa (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC) I understand...

information that does not fit in the Yorick article (for example, because of WP:BALASP) or the Hamlet article, or any one other article, and should be kept as...

probably goes to show that detail shouldn't be included (WP:WEIGHT / WP:BALASP). That other news sources decide not to include certain details may well...

that is inherently WP:DUE for inclusion. See the second paragraph of WP:BALASP, which states: In addition to describing why the subject is notable (e.g...

in some articles. Non-independent sources often help us comply with WP:BALASP (e.g., by giving us a birth year or birth place for a BLP) and sometimes...

significant coverage in reliable sources. I think a merge is inappropriate per WP:BALASP, as a merge would give far too much weight to this subsidiary; there's already...

07:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC) For large blocs/entire pages of content to be BALASP, we most certainly do need "someone else besides the airline" to confirm...

demonstrates "significance" helps us meet the requirements of WP:DUE and WP:BALASP. Also, naming a source in the prose of the article is a type of Wikipedia:Inline...

necessary to demonstrate that the content should be included per WP:VNOT/WP:BALASP/WP:DUE. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC) @The Bushranger:...

views) Appreciate input to the thread I opened here: Talk:Emma Barnett#WP:BALASP. DeCausa (talk) 15:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC) THE WIKI AGE FOR AUSTIN LANE...

information. That being said, WP:NPOV (specifically, WP:DUE, but also WP:BALASP) should be considered when attempts are made to say exactly what brand/model...

support side should have been given more weight as their sources applied WP:BALASP and were better-quality sources as well, as can be seen from the examples...

directly from official sites. This extra info on athletes further fails BALASP as it is not proportional to the weight given to that info in published...

or keeping the redirect and forcing a mentions, means running into WP:BALASP issues given the lack of any follow up coverage. (Even looked at google...

criticisms and controversies. We already have a policy regarding this at WP:BALASP, and resolving neutrality issues has been one of my main projects this year...

the NIH, it's about how to apply existing community wide norms on DUE, BALASP, RS, FALSEBALANCE, etc to one particular claim. The more people that participate...

materials which means there coverage in that article should be brief per WP:BALASP. I know this is not the desired outcome by editors who have an interest...

with some sport-specific treatments of winning streaks addressed when BALASP. Lists of winning streaks should be in separate list articles by sport and...

applies. Doug Weller talk 13:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Yes, or possibly WP:BALASP. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 13:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Is this...

level of detail in all sections. Refer to guidelines WP:SUMMARY STYLE, WP:BALASP, and WP:SUBARTICLE. Summary: This is not an obstacle to FA status ... I'm...

May 2026 (UTC) Oppose. Reliable sources decide what is included per WP:BALASP. If people are making inclusion arguments without citing sources, then their...

saying for a while. I believe reaction bloat is already disallowed per WP:BALASP and in some cases MOS:TRIVIA. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 23:30, 13 June 2025...

2025 (UTC) This isn't a weasel word situation, this would be closer to WP:BALASP or judging WP:DUEWEIGHT. But attribution still applies here. Who says it...

Wikipedians will use WP:DUE to cover this, but the better NPOV section is WP:BALASP. There's not a lot of explicit direction, and this is very much up to editorial...

independent coverage of a flag (not just mentions), then a picture might be BALASP somewhere else in the article, but definitely NOT the infobox. JoelleJay...

Bryson case. This allowance is also necessary to comply with WP:NPOV and WP:BALASP. I would note that this is already how things should function in practice;...

much WP:WEIGHT sources give to various aspects. Consider WP:SCOPE and WP:BALASP. These are all top level articles on the subject of persecution of these...

merging all the content would not be appropriate as it would not be WP:BALASP. However a full article on the subject is also not appropriate if it can...

should we? Based on this, I also support this proposal on the grounds of WP:BALASP; we are giving undue weight to an aspect of the topic that reliable sources...

further context into. Masem (t) 01:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC) It can be, per WP:BALASP. The most significant point, based on its weight in reliable sources, is...

and 20% disjoint quotes on isolated performances -- how can we capture BALASP if separate pieces of information have not been independently contextualized...

unreasonable, but I'm not convinced that this section should exist anyway per WP:BALASP. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:24, 13 August 2025 (UTC) Redirect to...

Wikipedia. I think this WP:POV. I used it too essay WP:CRIT & rule WP:BALASPS. I also see personal attacks on me in the post above. 『Shiro Neko』Обг....

ideologically opposed to a party in a dispute is a failure to adhere to NPOV (WP:BALASP, WP:BIASED). After seeing the above, I saw Snokalok add text saying Following...

16:56, 16 November 2025 (UTC) It's expanded now,[22] but there's an NPOV WP:BALASP issue with more text on his death than career. Not expecting a WP:GA, but...

consensus had not been reached, and while my primary concern was WP:DUE and WP:BALASP, there were aspects I felt were completely WP:UNDUE especially with regards...

07:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC) For large blocs/entire pages of content to be BALASP, we most certainly do need "someone else besides the airline" to confirm...