ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

will have appeared in more reliable sources. Shortcut WP:BLPPRIMARYWP:BLPPRIMARY Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Biography that fails WP:BASIC and WP:BLPPRIMARY. IQinn (talk) 02:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC) IQinn Keep -- Dog bites man...

records (thus WP:BLPPRIMARY). The only significant coverage from non-primary sources is this write up, based heavily on primary and blpprimary documents from...

like "Jeremy's visit to the farm" and the appeals. This breaches WP:BLPPRIMARY, "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

Result: Delisted. TompaDompa (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC) Multiple WP:BLPPRIMARY violations existed in the article. These violations were included in the...

primary sources in articles that are biographies of living persons. See WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY. Short quotations of copyrighted material are allowed...

secondary sources, where available, are usually preferred; further, see WP:BLPPRIMARY. Ancestry.com also hosts user-generated content, which is unreliable....

hosts transcribed primary source documents, which is covered under WP:BLPPRIMARY. The site's birth and death certificate records include the event's date...

authority that has detained this person are quite clearly not independent. WP:BLPPRIMARY is relevant here as well. Fram (talk) 08:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC) You...

insert birthdates using ancestry.com and census birth index violating WP:BLPPRIMARY. Similar diffs [1][2] and [3][4] Switched to the IP address to revert...

some references which are not connected to the person themselves. WP:BLPPRIMARY for example. I'm not suggesting that this person is not notable, and indeed...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) References are primary interviews. Fails WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 18:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Note:...

identify the master and keep a record for the future. Same violations of WP:BLPPRIMARY on same article. In order: [1], [2], [3] NeilN talk to me 21:14, 25 August...

reliability. When using primary source documents from FamilySearch, follow WP:BLPPRIMARY and avoid interpreting them with original research. FamilySearch is a...

witness to a Victorian Supreme Court defamation trial and a court filing—WP:BLPPRIMARY is unequivocal in this matter stating "Do not use trial transcripts and...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

up almost all of the prose. The only sources listed here are either WP:BLPPRIMARY or WP:BLPSPS. Sparkltalk 03:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Fails the most basic requirements for biographies WP:BASIC , WP:BIO, WP:BLPPRIMARY. First part is the interpretation of a primary sources document followed...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails even the most basic requirements for WP:BASIC and WP:BLPPRIMARY. First part is the interpretation of a primary sources document followed...

quite a lot, and as Lazarus is still alive, we cannot do that per WP:BLPPRIMARY. If it is for information unrelated to living people that is fine, but...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP that fails WP:BASIC and WP:BLPPRIMARY. IQinn (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Commment For the past 4 years...

prisoner from Guantanamo Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO, WP:BLPPRIMARY. DBigXray 21:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Refs are all PR, (BCCL agency). Fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 15:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

46.19.175 (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Please read WP:SPS and WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Relisted to...

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BLPPRIMARY as it has not been discussed by a secondary source. Zangar (talk) 03:36...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ANYBIO, WP:BIO and WP:BLPPRIMARY. Full of press-releases and sps sources to support framework with no real...

interview's, made at the begining of the film, in question. They fail WP:BLPPRIMARY. They are not secondary sources, and this is a WP:BLP. Where is the secondary...

Epstein-tag the person. The Epstein files are a WP:PRIMARY source. WP:BLPPRIMARY is very clear to avoid using the Epstein Files as a source. Even if secondary...

one as well, as it's misleading. BLPPRIMARY only applies to living person related things. You can't use BLPPRIMARY to say that all primary sources are...

is no secondary sources on this article and it is a BLP. It fails WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:SIGCOV a scope_creepTalk 15:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC) Delete It's...

particular account said something at a precise time. However, see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which prohibits use of primary sources on their own to source claims...

JSTOR · TWL) Refs are mix of profiles and interviews. Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 00:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) WP:BLPPRIMARY DBigXray 18:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

lieu of a BLP PROD? EricEnfermero (Talk) 19:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY Rathfelder (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Keep I agree with Eric...

kosboot (talk) 00:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Wouldn't that violate WP:BLPPRIMARY? Gamaliel (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Is the DMV a reliable source...

September 2022 (UTC) Since you are active here, please stop violating WP:BLPPRIMARY, which clearly states: "Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

that this is a primary source that could not be used in a BLP per WP:BLPPRIMARY. The gravamen of his statement, if I may be so bold as to summarize it...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

constructing an article largely around primary sources in this way violates WP:BLPPRIMARY. Nick-D (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

can be used provided the restrictions discussed in WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY are obeyed. In all cases, a secondary source is preferred. Some editors...

fails verification for notability. This indicates the topic fails BLP per BLPPRIMARY and BLPSOURCES and GNG. References are not reliable sources per fact checking...

No coverage. Refs are profiles and passing mentions. Fails sigcov and blpprimary. scope_creepTalk 16:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Mr. Stopps to include his age and location in direct violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY which sates: "Do not use public records that include personal details...

violates Wikipedia policy as expressed in WP:NOR and more specifically in WP:BLPPRIMARY: 'Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BLPPRIMARY. Of the 13 references, are either profiles, interviews or company details...

December 2022 (UTC) The article you referenced is nearly a decade old. WP:BLPPRIMARY are not designed for wealthy individuals owning nice cars, houses, etc...

this person, the current version contains a number of violations of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Compliance with that is not optional. Everything sourced to primary sources...

by some members of it. It merely documents that they exist. Also, WP:BLPPRIMARY cautions us: " Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) sourcing dependent on WP:BLPPRIMARY WP:BLPSPS WP:BLPSELFPUB 2 books are self-published, sourcing is largely...

sources and I always exercise caution when using primary sources (WP:BLPPRIMARY). TJMSmith (talk) 16:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Optional question from...

self-published. The only none WP:SPS source was: I was unaware of WP:BLPPRIMARY and since the subject of the article is now complaining that the article...

would have to be preferred. Mangoe (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY says "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

TWL) This article is excessively sourced to the individual's Patreon. WP:BLPPRIMARY allows sources from the individual the article is about, but this definitely...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. This article cites WP:BLPPRIMARY sources which promote a lot of Nazi ideology and activities. If he is...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

and possibly other people who'd think of doing the same, to not add WP:BLPPRIMARY sources (such as COMELEC documents) to the article in regards to BLP information...

generally primary unless it is a article about a model. They fail WP:BLPPRIMARY. Lets look at the first block of 10 references: Ref 1: [1] That is non-RS...

history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:SIGCOV. AldezD (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC) See also Wikipedia:Articles...

18:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC) that is called a primary source, see WP:BLPPRIMARY, and see WP:VIDEOREF about citing videos as for Muzar, different wikis...

Delete -- as per nom and AustralianRupert. Misuse of primary sources WP:BLPPRIMARY Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

February 2014 (UTC) Court decisions/records are unacceptable sources per WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC) Court documents...

investigated the incident without investigating crimes. This also falls under BLPPRIMARY BLPSPS. Complainant also refuses to mention attempts to resolve the dispute...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

charging affidavit hosted by Orlando Police is in compliance with WP:BLPPRIMARY; since it's a BLP article, we need extra care with using high-quality...

research consortium), and we cannot use the DOJ about living people per WP:BLPPRIMARY. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:31, 16 August 2025 (UTC) They have sigcov about...

directly to any of the coverage in the reliable sources and is a form of WP:BLPPRIMARY.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Keep, subject has...

point when their Daily Mail sources are removed; Virginia: violating BLPPRIMARY with a Homeland Security pdf, re-adding that same Twitter post that Laura...

madden national history bee and bowl" provides no results that meet WP:BLPPRIMARY or WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO does not provide guidelines for founders of quiz...

contents of the article and that sourcing of this article, in terms of WP:BLPPRIMARY and RS issues, leaves a lot to be desired (hint - sometimes less is more...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is the subject of coverage by non-WP:RS and WP:BLPPRIMARY sources. No combination of multiple unrelated non-primary sources appears...

(Category:2000 births and Deaths in 2023). Hence, but some sources are WP:BLPPRIMARY. MirrorPlanet (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

pieces are primary sources rather than secondary sources, and per WP:BLPPRIMARY (which is under a section about reliable sources within WP:BLP) "Exercise...

extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy." I have not interpreted primary source material. Another...

—Anotherclown (talk) 09:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:BLP, WP:BLPPRIMARY. Misuse of primary sources in a BLP that presents the individual in a...

coverage in his capacity as a representative (fails WP:42). Lots of WP:BLPPRIMARY, too. JFHJr (㊟) 18:38, 21 April 2013 (UTC) He has an article on his career:...

secondary source to cover WP:DUE for covering the open letter at all (per WP:BLPPRIMARY, Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary...

it comes to text, where WP:BLPPRIMARY is intended to prevent this from occurring). Perhaps we need something like BLPPRIMARY for images, in that we required...

after his second marriage.") In its current state, the BLP violates WP:BLPPRIMARY ("Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date...

source primary too... or something like that. And that makes it a WP:BLPPRIMARY issue. Icewhiz continues to repeat this nonsense [15] even after it's...

content to articles? Are you relying on trademark cases that fall under WP:BLPPRIMARY? Isn't keeping the article in the hopes that a reliable source will make...

contrary to WP:BLPPRIMARY. Zad68 01:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Well, we are discussing a deceased person here. But yes, for living persons, WP:BLPPRIMARY applies...

thomson (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Public record is out per WP:BLPPRIMARY. I'd go with Twitter per WP:BLPSELFPUB, if there are other conflicting...

potentially contentious content sourced to a court document pursuant to WP:BLPPRIMARY. Redthoreau has twice restored this content [117][118] in spite of a warning...

sources, which are both disallowed for sensitive BLP information, see WP:BLPPRIMARY). Mz7 (talk) 21:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

against Ashok Chauhan, citing only a Commission ruling (in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Here you remove an accusation of criminality against Arindam Chaudhuri...

can be used provided the restrictions discussed in WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY are obeyed". Specifically, point 3 under Primary sources referring to...

thought that it could be used to augment the secondary sources as per WP:BLPPRIMARY as it was being called fake news. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:15, 15 October...

(talk / contribs) 12:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC) I also think there are WP:BLPPRIMARY concerns with this article. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:25, 6 November...

(WP:NOTADVOCATE). Stuff from the jail web site is not allowed under WP:BLPPRIMARY. The other sources are mostly about a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC like murder, Clemency...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

sources, which, even if in fact true, are violations of WP:BLPSPS and WP:BLPPRIMARY until substantiated by reliable sources. If no reliable sources have promoted...

documents. Several places in Wikipedia (including WP:OR, WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY) caution against drawing any conclusions or performing your own analysis...

are the magazines. Your entire premise for keeping rests on shaky WP:BLPPRIMARY grounds. TheValeyard (talk) 00:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC) As I said when nominating...

August 2022 (UTC) Like I said, I've removed that source before as a WP:BLPPRIMARY violation. Restoring it without consensus would violate WP:BLPRESTORE...

ref #3 is the same as #1, afaik a WP:PRIMARY and unacceptable per WP:BLPPRIMARY ref #4 is an interview and therefore not independent ref #5 is not accessible...

lawsuit, it cannot be included, period, end of sentence. Please read WP:BLPPRIMARY, as I posted on your talk page (which you just blanked), Do not use trial...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

Search results for a marriage license at a county clerk's office. WP:BLPPRIMARY specifically says this kind of source should never be used in this context...

strongly suggest both parties review them, can be found here: WP:PS, WP:BLPPRIMARY Jsharpminor (talk) 02:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC) The actual relevant question...

May - 22 May there was a discussion of the use of a journal article vs. BLPPRIMARY document from an investigating agency for a minor aspect). User has not...

which is what you say, but is a completely different thing. Please see WP:BLPPRIMARY to find what is wrong with this and many other similar articles. Fram...

credits to publicise otherwise unknown private details feels borderline WP:BLPPRIMARY to me. If the subject—who, it should be noted, has a significant online...

violates Wikipedia policy as expressed in WP:NOR and more specifically in WP:BLPPRIMARY: 'Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

individual seemed outspoken, and is now dead, WP:BLP applies, particularly WP:BLPPRIMARY for the court records etc. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC) This...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

opinion? As for "there are no BLP issues", I am rather amazed that WP:BLPPRIMARY is not known to you. Fram (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC) Speedy...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

it's still a primary source, and so those rules apply (especially WP:BLPPRIMARY). I'd try to find something else personally. ~Charmlet -talk- 13:47, 16...

deceased person this sort of record falls under the prohibition in WP:BLPPRIMARY. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Yes, I wasn't so much...

birth referenced by public records at Companies House in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. This was reverted here by me with a clear edit summary mentioning this...

1951". Subsequently in Special:Diff/823920807/next they violated WP:BLPPRIMARY and introduced based on a misreading of this primary source the birth...

child name in an unrelated Wikipedia biography appears not meeting WP:BLPPRIMARY and other problems well known to admins. 4. Verifiability alone is not...

05:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC) <Undent>My two cents: WP:Primary and WP:BLPPRIMARY could usefully be edited to prevent use of primary sources that could...

about you now, for example the 'BLPPRIMARY' edit you mention was this one, where I removed a source which violates BLPPRIMARY. I never said you added the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

"opinion pieces", WP:NOR says opinion pieces are primary sources, and WP:BLPPRIMARY says that primary sources may rarely be used, unless discussed by secondary...

(talk) 09:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC) Thanks. I think it was a violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY once the editor eventually supplied a court petition source but I'm not...

May 2021 Adds a year of birth referenced by this, in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Where is the evidence "Kate Osborne" and this "Katharine Helen Osborne"...

(UTC) Changed to keep - see rationale below Delete - Does not meet the WP:BLPPRIMARY. Every single mention is a primary source, and the one of them that linked...

context. The niche use I was alluding to in that case is described in WP:BLPPRIMARY: Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

secondary sources, where available, are usually preferred; further, see WP:BLPPRIMARY. Ancestry.com also hosts user-generated content, which is unreliable....

sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion." From WP:BLPPRIMARY: "Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources." From WP:BLPREMOVE:...

based entirely on a primary source (state contribution records). See WP:BLPPRIMARY. EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Page: The Salesman (2016...

(talk) 20:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC) The article does run up against WP:BLPPRIMARY, but it is patently obvious that the information is being presented accurately...

(talk) 12:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC) I removed that because WP:BLPPRIMARY explicitly says you're not supposed to use public documents as sources...

relating to BLPs. As they were adding dates of birth in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, it is hardly an unreasonable notification. 15:46, 03 May is the notification...

examined the first 20 references. There is 3 interviews that fail WP:BLPPRIMARY, lots of passing mentions and several profiles, one of which is quite...

User:Darkness Shines, where Neo attempted to argue that WP:PRIMARY (including WP:BLPPRIMARY) don't apply here, despite the fact that they apply everywhere in Wikipedia...

informed in was a violation of BLPPRIMARY, and in my removal of the content involved I [70] explained in was a BLPPRIMARY issue. this violates principle...

information in numerous BLPs, if their edit summary is accurate then WP:BLPPRIMARY also applies and there's gonna be a lot of cleanup in order for us after...

so it's made completely clear: the most relevant alphabet soup is WP:BLPPRIMARY, which explicitly says, with emphasis in the original... Do not use trial...

September 2019 (UTC) In the meantime, Jack continues to edit war violating WP:BLPPRIMARY this time.[56] Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC) Yes...

about this individual by reliable secondary sources. See also WP:BLP, WP:BLPPRIMARY, author=OARDEC. IQinn (talk) 07:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC) See...

please see WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC) @The Bushranger: Thank you for raising the WP:BLPPRIMARY point. Please...

sources (maybe also Breitbart) had brought up this restraining order. WP:BLPPRIMARY does allow for the referencing of primary sources if they support details...

See this article history: [108] A clear and unambiguous violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Parkjenmin (talk · contribs ·...

Radiohist (talk • contribs) 00:30, 19 May 2013 No, they aren't: See WP:BLPPRIMARY. I see you've started a thread on the same subject at Wikipedia:Reliable...

January 2018 (UTC) See WP:DOB The first two are primary sources, so WP:BLPPRIMARY applies to them. The third is a website that uses user-submitted content...

registration records to establish a political candidate's party affiliation? WP:BLPPRIMARY says: "Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial...

gift then reports it using PR agency is not a valid source. It fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 08:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC) It's not a PR agency-written...

"primary sources" for a DOB. However until they change the policy at WP:BLPPRIMARY specifically prohibiting them, they don't have a leg to stand on. I've...

conclusion that these were poorly sourced WP:BLP articles violating WP:BLPPRIMARY. And ALL of these Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons articles have...

(+another copy: 09:36, 2 September 2021) Posting material in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:NOTAFORUM. If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence...

transcripts, assuming they are correctly translated, is also problematic per WP:BLPPRIMARY, especially considering that the activist site itself said that "Later...

quite reasonably: just give a few basic statements, especially since WP:BLPPRIMARY all but forbids using primary sources about living people, and isn't pretty...

22 February 2014 (UTC) As for being "in a court record", remember WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC) The discussion...

23:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC) Agreed. I also support Ronnotel's actions, per BLPPRIMARY. A team of anons have been trying to force this stuff into the article...

whether secondary sources have discussed them. That is part of the point of BLPPRIMARY -- to prevent editors from adding original research to BLPs based on issues...

block log) First reported here. Given final warning for blatantly violating WP:BLPPRIMARY here by me. Re-inserted same material today [145]. Seems to be here for...

citation to the source. [70] I remove the unsourced BLP violation per WP:BLPPRIMARY. [71] On the talk page Miradre then suggests[72] using an extract in the...

Don't fall prey to the G.I.F.T., and you might want to take a look at WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Thank you...

a person court documents are explicitly disallowed as sources per WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC) My view on...

but it is sourced only to primary sources, which is a violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Although I wouldn't normally pick which version to lock, I am considering...

with you, you STILL haven't provided a reliable secondary sources. WP:BLPPRIMARY is abundantly clear that a reliable secondary source is required. Do that...

intimate financial details taken from a primary source then it's not, per WP:BLPPRIMARY. PS queries like this are best placed at WP:BLPN. GiantSnowman 16:03,...

subsection. "you can't use primary court case documents in a BLP (WP:BLPPRIMARY)..."Endwise (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)"|date=June 2022}} Avica1998...

Aloneinthewild (talk) 11:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Hm, let's see...WP:NOTNEWS...WP:BLPPRIMARY...perhaps others. Biographical material (like everything else) must be...

May 2017 (UTC) I must be missing something. Neither WP:PRIMARY nor WP:BLPPRIMARY says that. Certain primary sources, e.g., trial transcripts, are indeed...

think this one definitely needs secondary sourcing, Drmies? I reviewed WP:BLPPRIMARY and the subsequent couple of sections in that policy, and since this is...

details is using (in part) a court judgement as a source - which is a WP:BLPPRIMARY violation and should be removed (at least what isn't sourced elsewhere)...

However, I wouldn't have used a court document had I been aware of WP:BLPPRIMARY. I have WP:PROD'd the article in question as a result. If someone wishes...

rollbacker to retain BLP violation without discussion per WP:ONUS (and WP:BLPPRIMARY) to retain such information. They threatened blocks for vandalism even...

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:UNDUE, WP:BLPSTYLE, WP:BALASP, WP:PROPORTION, WP:BLPPRIMARY. Bezeq2 (talk) 14:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC) I have restored the RFC....

with an edit summary of Undid revision 1043133543 by Mikele99 (talk) WP:BLPPRIMARY, see also Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#infotextmanuscripts...

covered in a secondary manner- see archive(book form),NYT, I removed WP:BLPPRIMARY/WP:OR from his page (sourced to a 'court transcript, that didn't support...

User:Cassiopeia who at least initially edited completed inappropriate. Per WP:BLPPRIMARY and to a lesser extent WP:BLPNAME we do not rely on primary sources no...

data are not acceptable at the sole sources for any information per WP:BLPPRIMARY. I'm not sure why we're even talking about it anyway. You claim Reuters...

Jones (talk) 20:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC) You might also wish to review WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY before trying to restore the use Companies House records...

24 August 2017 (UTC) The point is that we need to start enforcing WP:BLPPRIMARY rather than tolerating news reports. These kids never heard of the Peloponnesian...

with a paragraph containing the date of birth of the subject, but WP:BLPPRIMARY prohibits using primary sources for this kind of information and instead...

years before he was born. For this and this, the IP is right - per WP:BLPPRIMARY "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

since it seems to rely heavily on court documents in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Nil Einne (talk) 06:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

the incidents to a version from over a year ago, which also contained BLPPRIMARY violations, and in doing so removed up to a hundred (wild guess there...

named account or two, are using primary sources in contravention of WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY for date of birth, place of birth, and birth_name. There...

WP:BLP (a) that is based only on a primary source, in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, and (b) is based on a source that does even not name the person at issue...

second diff has less to do with Steeletrap’s topicban and more to do with BLPPRIMARY and WP:BANEX. The third diff has nothing to do with the tban. Sanctions...

December 2022 (UTC) The article you referenced is nearly a decade old. WP:BLPPRIMARY are not designed for wealthy individuals owning nice cars, houses, etc...

precluded by the Biographies of living persons policy (BLP), specifically WP:BLPPRIMARY." This redirect is an unsourced BLP violation. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 01:14...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Biography that fails WP:BASIC and WP:BLPPRIMARY. IQinn (talk) 02:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC) IQinn Keep -- Dog bites man...

Her schooling is attributed to the school she attended, which fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. The random YouTube links I've clicked on in the article are not from...

you violated WP:BLPCRIME. Your edits to this article also violate WP:BLPPRIMARY. @Armeym please read through WP:BLP if you plan to continue making edits...

cited a primary-source court document, in direct contravention of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Greider is not notable for her personal life, and given that the article...

Schonbrun, for example. THF (talk) 23:07, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Per WP:BLPPRIMARY claims about living people cannot be sourced directly to court documents...

statement, as primary court docs are never tolerated in BLP's, see WP:BLPPRIMARY. Jonathanwallace (talk) 04:48, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Jeff Andrus (edit |...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources are either WP:BLPPRIMARY or blogs. A quick before shows no significant or sustained coverage in...

(talk • contribs) 09:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC) My understanding is that WP:BLPPRIMARY precludes the use of any official records for personal info so only reliable...

WP:SPS for an article. Sumbuddi (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY is pretty unequivocal about this: "Do not use trial transcripts and other...

use in support of certain types of personal content as explained in WP:BLPPRIMARY, but they are not helpful at all in establishing Wikipedia notability...

brochure article. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No effective references. Fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 11:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

sourced to a reliable primary source. That is against our BLP policy WP:BLPPRIMARY which specifically says "Do not use public records that include personal...

standards, and I would finish that sentence "...but their use is banned by WP:BLPPRIMARY. We don't actually require fact-checking. We especially don't require...

cautious about basing large passages on them.". This leads us back to WP:BLPPRIMARY that states: "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable...

(maybe distinguishing them as "independent primary sources"), but WP:BLPPRIMARY would greatly restrict their usage in the most problematic articles. Red...

WP:PRIMARY, along with a few extensions for specific situations like WP:BLPPRIMARY. For the kind of information you mention in your question (track listings...

Wikipedia doesn't accept those definitions. More importantly, see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which outright bans the use of "public records that include personal...

the information by including it here (and it would be a violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY to depend on court records as the sole source for any BLP content). In...

the actual BLPPRIMARY guidelines, which states that primary sources can be used to augment a secondary source covering the matter. BLPPRIMARY says absolutely...

other way to meet Verifiability standards." You should also look at WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPCAT. Regards, Jonathan A Jones (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2015...

cannot be used as reliable sources as they are easily doctored and fail WP:BLPPRIMARY, regardless of whether they are presented on or off Wikipedia. OTRS agents...

have missed something. These are also obviously primary sources (and BLPPRIMARY), but I'm not sure that it is correct to say that these are "inappropriate...

death were added shortly after, however in 2016 it would have violated WP:BLPPRIMARY (there is no evidence in the primary document that the person mentioned...

that coroner's report, and even if it were, it would fall foul of WP:BLPPRIMARY. It's a mess.) --JN466 00:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC) K. bring it up on...

name-calling using primary rather than secondary sources as required by WP:BLPPRIMARY. I see no redeeming features to this article. Yworo (talk) 17:58, 9 March...

question is whether the birth record should be used at all, in light of WP:BLPPRIMARY: "Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date...

16 June 2020 (UTC) I removed Timtempleton's ref (and some more) per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Per current references, the article should be deleted. Gråbergs Gråa...

This is a bias (and non-notable) article about a living person. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. QuackGuru (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Keep; while I have mixed...

Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC) The relevant policy is WP:BLPPRIMARY, which says not to use public documents and records as sources for statements...

individuals' own accounts of their captivity, which is borderline WP:BLPPRIMARY. The current coverage of these individuals at Gaza war hostage crisis...

of that source (which was used with caution as per instructions at WP:BLPPRIMARY) don't, in my opinion, warrant the deletion of the entire article. My...

pretty much agree with the others that this video is a problem per WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPSPS. Interviews, even print interviews, are WP:PRIMARY sources...

issues, court documents are fine." But WP:BLPPRIMARY does not support that. Why should we interpret WP:BLPPRIMARY beyond what it explicitly states? Flyer22...

Delete -- as per nom and AustralianRupert. Misuse of primary sources WP:BLPPRIMARY Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

alumni newspaper - contains only "Clarice E. Phelps, 2003" - possibly a WP:BLPPRIMARY issue (as one can not be sure this is the same Phelps). ref3 - tnstate...

policy not name of spouse). The marriage certificate, however, falls on WP:BLPPRIMARY. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC) I would like to...

discussion of that primary material in reliable secondary sources. See WP:BLPPRIMARY Fladrif (talk) 23:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC) Well, it's perfectly acceptable...

don't establish notability, but they may be used within the limits of WP:BLPPRIMARY. For instance, it may be appropriate to cite them for supplemental details...

individual seemed outspoken, and is now dead, WP:BLP applies, particularly WP:BLPPRIMARY for the court records etc. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC) This...

records (thus WP:BLPPRIMARY). The only significant coverage from non-primary sources is this write up, based heavily on primary and blpprimary documents from...

WP:CALC, "Routine calculations do not count as original research"..) per WP:BLPPRIMARY: "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary...

based off the primary source website FreeBMD. I removed it based on WP:BLPPRIMARY, since her real name is not available in any other third-party sources...

reference and reference 3, yet reference 1 is an interview, that fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. It is not independent. Ref 2. The GROGNARD Files That is a blog. It is...

(personal or otherwise) are generally considered to be WP:PRIMARY (or WP:BLPPRIMARY) types of sources, and there are lots of restrictions placed on how they...

record to make what he/she called a pertinent point, whereas I followed WP:BLPPRIMARY and substituted a secondary source rather than another court document...

want to tell. I tell it as I saw it." This is just a primary source; WP:BLPPRIMARY. It's a charity, not a reliable publisher. Reliable publisher, but unless...

making regular updates to this article that I believe violate WP:NOR, WP:BLPPRIMARY, and WP:NPOV. Unless I’m deeply mistaken about WP:BLP, this should be...

ThanxMwinog2777 (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC) No, Mwinog2777, don't use them. WP:BLPPRIMARY (part of the WP:BLP policy page) says "Do not use trial transcripts and...

persons is taged with a specific identifier. These identifiers, like WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:WELLKNOWN, WP:BLPSOURCES are the ones that should be used when discussing...

fellows/awards that are only found in primary sources contradicting WP:BLPPRIMARY and self published sources FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)...

removed his middle names, cited only to the London Gazette, arguably a WP:BLPPRIMARY source, but it was restored by the article creator. WP:BLPPRIVACY states...

This is a bias (and non-notable) article about a living person. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. QuackGuru (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Keep; while I have mixed...

(talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC) A good SPS would work, but WP:BLPPRIMARY? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC) @Nick Moyes: - @Galendalia:...

October 2013 (UTC) Which runs headlong into WP:BLPPRIMARY. A significant reason for the existence of BLPPRIMARY is that there is all sorts of stuff in public...

this person, the current version contains a number of violations of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Compliance with that is not optional. Everything sourced to primary sources...

is no secondary sources on this article and it is a BLP. It fails WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:SIGCOV a scope_creepTalk 15:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC) Delete It's...

critical of certain attorneys sourced only to judge's opinions, citing WP:BLPPRIMARY: "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

(talk) 00:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC) To the contrary. This falls under WP:BLPPRIMARY (assuming the person is still alive): "Do not use trial transcripts and...

he wrote the text about himself at least partly himself. See also WP:BLPPRIMARY. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the...

authority that has detained this person are quite clearly not independent. WP:BLPPRIMARY is relevant here as well. Fram (talk) 08:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC) You...

purports to have seen "her birth record," which is a patent violation of BLPPRIMARY. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC) I didn't go deeper...

the sources (see "Policy" paragraph on WP:PRIMARY). In other cases, WP:BLPPRIMARY becomes an issue. In still other cases, the source we are citing is not...

extra caution when handling primary sources about living people. and WP:BLPPRIMARY (which is linked to from WP:PRIMARY) says, in relevant part Do not use...

primary sources, and especially when it concerns living people (see WP:BLPPRIMARY). But using this document as a source for just the fact of the divorce...

lieu of a BLP PROD? EricEnfermero (Talk) 19:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY Rathfelder (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Keep I agree with Eric...

page discussions on the issue. 11. Primary and SPS are used by me as per BLPPRIMARY and SPS in our Verifiability policy. The sources have been used to confirm...

dealing with article content about any living person as explained in WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPSPS. You might want to ask about the reliability of the source...

it is currently written: "Some of these sources may be usable under WP:BLPPRIMARY, but secondary sources, where available, are usually preferred". There's...

State Department document it's based on, which may be excluded by WP:BLPPRIMARY. We need extra-good RS to put "contentious material about living persons"...

discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. WP:BLPPRIMARY states 'Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other...

Instagram post, not a gossip site). Please read WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPPRIMARY carefully. 3) "I'll resubmit it with the same references and more over...

February 2020 (UTC) QuiteUnusual As in General Register Office? Since WP:BLPPRIMARY doesn't apply, I have no problem with you using that as a ref (I'm not...

specifically link to WP:BLPPRIVACY? This child's coverage is mainly WP:BLPPRIMARY reports from the Swedish royal family's website, with the rest being WP:ROUTINE...

constructing an article largely around primary sources in this way violates WP:BLPPRIMARY. Nick-D (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

marriage and census records. Some of these sources may be usable under WP:BLPPRIMARY, but secondary sources, where available, are usually preferred. Ancestry...

after his second marriage.") In its current state, the BLP violates WP:BLPPRIMARY ("Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date...

alumni newspaper - contains only "Clarice E. Phelps, 2003" - possibly a WP:BLPPRIMARY issue (as one can not be sure this is the same Phelps). ref3 - tnstate...

of the reasons we have BLPPRIMARY, we don't trust ourselves to read these sources correctly. And if you don't think BLPPRIMARY applies (I disagree), what...

usability as a source would be highly restricted per WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:BLPPRIMARY. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC) Hi Marchjuly, Thank you...

February 2014 (UTC) Court decisions/records are unacceptable sources per WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC) Court documents...

(talk) 12:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC) I removed that because WP:BLPPRIMARY explicitly says you're not supposed to use public documents as sources...

the article relies heavily on primary sources in violation of Wikipedia:BLPPRIMARY. BLP emphasizes that "[w]e must get the article right." We are unable...

madden national history bee and bowl" provides no results that meet WP:BLPPRIMARY or WP:SIGCOV. WP:BIO does not provide guidelines for founders of quiz...

the source (except in BLPs, where even this should be avoided [see WP:BLPPRIMARY]). A tertiary source generally does nothing more than sum up the secondary...

event". Use of primary sources in a BLP is strongly discouraged (see WP:BLPPRIMARY). These two may not use my phrase "citation by example", but when examples...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) BLP that fails WP:BASIC and WP:BLPPRIMARY. IQinn (talk) 07:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Commment For the past 4 years...

appeal. The using of court documents as RS may need to be assessed per WP:BLPPRIMARY, but a general summary of this incident seems appropriate for the article...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) References are primary interviews. Fails WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 18:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Note:...

some references which are not connected to the person themselves. WP:BLPPRIMARY for example. I'm not suggesting that this person is not notable, and indeed...

about this individual by reliable secondary sources. See also WP:BLP, WP:BLPPRIMARY, author=OARDEC. IQinn (talk) 07:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC) See...

consensus to blacklist. In cases where a primary source is being linked, WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:PRIMARY are obviously still controlling as to if the source is...

(UTC) Changed to keep - see rationale below Delete - Does not meet the WP:BLPPRIMARY. Every single mention is a primary source, and the one of them that linked...

of that source (which was used with caution as per instructions at WP:BLPPRIMARY) don't, in my opinion, warrant the deletion of the entire article. My...

creator disagrees with my interpretation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, and says: I'm not sure that the WP:BLPPRIMARY is indicating that you can't use court documents...

event". Use of primary sources in a BLP is strongly discouraged (see WP:BLPPRIMARY). These two may not use my phrase "citation by example", but when examples...

self-published. The only none WP:SPS source was: I was unaware of WP:BLPPRIMARY and since the subject of the article is now complaining that the article...

archived on that site. This falls squarely under the prohibition of WP:BLPPRIMARY, which says, "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or...

source documents from Geni.com can be used when appropriate under WP:BLPPRIMARY to support a reliable secondary source, but take care not to use original...

non-starter. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Have you even read WP:BLPPRIMARY? We do not cite court documents as references for convictions in BLPs...

by some members of it. It merely documents that they exist. Also, WP:BLPPRIMARY cautions us: " Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or...

the article relies heavily on primary sources in violation of Wikipedia:BLPPRIMARY. BLP emphasizes that "[w]e must get the article right." We are unable...

—Anotherclown (talk) 09:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:BLP, WP:BLPPRIMARY. Misuse of primary sources in a BLP that presents the individual in a...

JSTOR · TWL) Fails even the most basic requirements for WP:BASIC and WP:BLPPRIMARY. First part is the interpretation of a primary sources document followed...

December 2019 (UTC) A BLP that is based on primary sources violates the WP:BLPPRIMARY part of WP:BLP, and the WP:PSTS and WP:SYNTH parts of WP:NOR. – Levivich...

(talk / contribs) 12:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC) I also think there are WP:BLPPRIMARY concerns with this article. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:25, 6 November...

No coverage. Refs are profiles and passing mentions. Fails sigcov and blpprimary. scope_creepTalk 16:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

within policy? Thanks. User:Doug Weller 13:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY says Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial...

that this is a primary source that could not be used in a BLP per WP:BLPPRIMARY. The gravamen of his statement, if I may be so bold as to summarize it...

Further, Comment there are several entries in this list that use WP:BLPPRIMARY even as this is against wikipedia policy. I also encourage the reading...

(WP:BLPSELFPUB), like subjects website or (confirmed) social media. Not WP:BLPPRIMARY stuff. But there is no problem with not having a DOB in an article. Gråbergs...

by secondary sources? No. Does WP:DUE apply to facts Yes. See also WP:BLPPRIMARY. The congressional record is a primary source. A group writing about their...

1951". Subsequently in Special:Diff/823920807/next they violated WP:BLPPRIMARY and introduced based on a misreading of this primary source the birth...

Further, Comment there are several entries in this list that use WP:BLPPRIMARY even as this is against wikipedia policy. I also encourage the reading...

to the public, but if the person is still alive, you can't use it (WP:BLPPRIMARY). Jc3s5h (talk) 18:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Dear Wikipedia , The Shishu...

up almost all of the prose. The only sources listed here are either WP:BLPPRIMARY or WP:BLPSPS. Sparkltalk 03:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

use, particularly when it involves claims about living persons per WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPSPS. Even what you posted above about the ship's captain might...

AfDs were all in the 2000s. HOWEVER the article does have numerous WP:BLPPRIMARY issues which need to be fixed. She is covered in this scholarly article...

name-calling using primary rather than secondary sources as required by WP:BLPPRIMARY. I see no redeeming features to this article. Yworo (talk) 17:58, 9 March...

are the magazines. Your entire premise for keeping rests on shaky WP:BLPPRIMARY grounds. TheValeyard (talk) 00:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC) As I said when nominating...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BLPPRIMARY. Of the 13 references, are either profiles, interviews or company details...

the lawsuit as this was sourced only to a legal document, which under BLPPRIMARY is not allowed as a source. I left a message on the talk page explaining...

sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) WP:BLPPRIMARY DBigXray 18:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

all. This is a very strict guideline that you can read about here: WP:BLPPRIMARY. Also about the award, there is almost no information about it. Searching...

(WP:NOTADVOCATE). Stuff from the jail web site is not allowed under WP:BLPPRIMARY. The other sources are mostly about a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC like murder, Clemency...

directly to any of the coverage in the reliable sources and is a form of WP:BLPPRIMARY.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Keep, subject has...

WP:BLPPRIMARY. We just have a table from UCI and a press release from Sport Integrity Australia, two primary sources. Even if this survives BLPPRIMARY scrutiny...

Mr. Stopps to include his age and location in direct violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY which sates: "Do not use public records that include personal details...

specifically link to WP:BLPPRIVACY? This child's coverage is mainly WP:BLPPRIMARY reports from the Swedish royal family's website, with the rest being WP:ROUTINE...

interview's, made at the begining of the film, in question. They fail WP:BLPPRIMARY. They are not secondary sources, and this is a WP:BLP. Where is the secondary...

reference and reference 3, yet reference 1 is an interview, that fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. It is not independent. Ref 2. The GROGNARD Files That is a blog. It is...

fails verification for notability. This indicates the topic fails BLP per BLPPRIMARY and BLPSOURCES and GNG. References are not reliable sources per fact checking...

all. This is a very strict guideline that you can read about here: WP:BLPPRIMARY. Also about the award, there is almost no information about it. Searching...

the Teahouse. In general, no such sources are not acceptable. See WP:BLPPRIMARY which says: Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not...

prisoner from Guantanamo Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO, WP:BLPPRIMARY. DBigXray 21:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy." I have not interpreted primary source material. Another...

that coroner's report, and even if it were, it would fall foul of WP:BLPPRIMARY. It's a mess.) --JN466 00:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC) K. bring it up on...

JSTOR · TWL) Refs are mix of profiles and interviews. Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 00:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

content to articles? Are you relying on trademark cases that fall under WP:BLPPRIMARY? Isn't keeping the article in the hopes that a reliable source will make...

gift then reports it using PR agency is not a valid source. It fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 08:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC) It's not a PR agency-written...

would have to be preferred. Mangoe (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY says "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

WP:SOURCEACCESS. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC) According to WP:BLPPRIMARY public records which include personal information such as date of birth...

brochure article. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No effective references. Fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 11:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

examined the first 20 references. There is 3 interviews that fail WP:BLPPRIMARY, lots of passing mentions and several profiles, one of which is quite...

(talk) 10:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Banned by the all too often ignored WP:BLPPRIMARY which says: " Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or...

thought that it could be used to augment the secondary sources as per WP:BLPPRIMARY as it was being called fake news. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:15, 15 October...

policy, no original research, and the other sourcing policies." --WP:BLPPRIMARY This is right above WP:BLPSPS, which says "Never use self-published sources—including...

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Refs are all PR, (BCCL agency). Fails WP:BLPPRIMARY. scope_creepTalk 15:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

December 2019 (UTC) A BLP that is based on primary sources violates the WP:BLPPRIMARY part of WP:BLP, and the WP:PSTS and WP:SYNTH parts of WP:NOR. – Levivich...

August 2022 (UTC) Like I said, I've removed that source before as a WP:BLPPRIMARY violation. Restoring it without consensus would violate WP:BLPRESTORE...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ANYBIO, WP:BIO and WP:BLPPRIMARY. Full of press-releases and sps sources to support framework with no real...

charged (according to a cited WP:BLPPRIMARY). The accusations are properly sourced (except maybe for the WP:BLPPRIMARY) and as such the whole article has...

record to make what he/she called a pertinent point, whereas I followed WP:BLPPRIMARY and substituted a secondary source rather than another court document...

which is what you say, but is a completely different thing. Please see WP:BLPPRIMARY to find what is wrong with this and many other similar articles. Fram...

generally primary unless it is a article about a model. They fail WP:BLPPRIMARY. Lets look at the first block of 10 references: Ref 1: [11] That is non-RS...

equated with court records and trial transcripts and thus is violating WP:BLPPRIMARY and, by extension, WP:NOR. I would like to settle this issue here, with...

birthdate, given her clearly expressed wishes not to have it widely known. WP:BLPPRIMARY says, don't use primary sources for this purpose, only use secondary sources...

information. I'm not sure if there is previous consensus is regarding WP:BLPPRIMARY and high schools. Siawase (talk) 19:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC) This news wire...

46.19.175 (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC) Please read WP:SPS and WP:BLPPRIMARY. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Relisted to...

comment added by Radiohist (talk • contribs) 00:26, 19 May 2013 See WP:BLPPRIMARY: "Exercise caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts...

5 January 2018 (UTC) Would the use of a court document not violate WP:BLPPRIMARY? -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Primary sources...

sources, which, even if in fact true, are violations of WP:BLPSPS and WP:BLPPRIMARY until substantiated by reliable sources. If no reliable sources have promoted...

links | watch | logs | views) Quick question about application of WP:BLPPRIMARY. This ref from a state government agency is being used as a reference...

want to tell. I tell it as I saw it." This is just a primary source; WP:BLPPRIMARY. It's a charity, not a reliable publisher. Reliable publisher, but unless...

Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." and WP:BLPPRIMARY says "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

personal details such date of birth regarding a living person. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC) This is a WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT...

♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BLPPRIMARY as it has not been discussed by a secondary source. Zangar (talk) 03:36...

private or negative. Orthogonal1 (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY allows for self-published/primary sources where they are about the primary...

contents of the article and that sourcing of this article, in terms of WP:BLPPRIMARY and RS issues, leaves a lot to be desired (hint - sometimes less is more...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Mainly based on WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLP1E. Not salvageable as the person is WP:NPF with not enough...

police report mentioning her date of birth is unacceptable as per WP:BLPPRIMARY. These are all policies, not guidelines, and so are not subject to editorial...

a deal in Russia," as I noted below. The issue here isn't that it's a BLPPRIMARY violation (it isn't); the problem is that the WP editor who introduced...

cautious about basing large passages on them.". This leads us back to WP:BLPPRIMARY that states: "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable...

coverage in his capacity as a representative (fails WP:42). Lots of WP:BLPPRIMARY, too. JFHJr (㊟) 18:38, 21 April 2013 (UTC) He has an article on his career:...

of user contributions (like an open wiki), which should be avoided. WP:BLPPRIMARY allows limited use of Geni's primary source documents to support a reliable...

reliable for his place of birth? And if it is reliable, would it violate WP:BLPPRIMARY? Nightscream (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Unreliable. The source...

so I checked in about this over at the OTRS noticeboard. And while WP:BLPPRIMARY suggests a birth certificate not be depended upon, WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:SELFPUB...

material about a living person, I don't think you can use it at all. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. If you can tell us which article you are talking about and how you want...

information" 01:24, 9 August 2012: "WP only allows allmusic, per WP:PSTS and WP:BLPPRIMARY. If you don't agree, you'll need to change the policies in place here...

records such as birth and death certificates are usually allowed under WP:BLPPRIMARY as long as they're used to support a secondary source instead of interpreted...

governed by WP:BLP policy. In this instance, the applicable policy is WP:BLPPRIMARY. That policy says specifically not to use public documents "to support...

Infirmary is in Blackburn. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY applies here; and yes, where the birth was registered is not the same...

people then public records such as court documents are prohibited per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Betty Logan (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Bingo. Court documents are...

general, a reliable source and if the restrictions imposed by PRIMARY and BLPPRIMARY are observed. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)...

policies I just listed. -- Avi (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY: Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

Instagram post, not a gossip site). Please read WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPPRIMARY carefully. 3) "I'll resubmit it with the same references and more over...

controversial claims using the the IslamQA.info website and this seems to fail WP:BLPPRIMARY. Thanks RookTaker (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC) This book makes...

cover the breaking news here, and this article as is is a massive WP:BLPPRIMARY violation. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2026 (UTC) UTC) Keep - good...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME. This article cites WP:BLPPRIMARY sources which promote a lot of Nazi ideology and activities. If he is...

sure that part of MOSLAW is a good idea at all. Finally, remember that BLPPRIMARY further limits the use of primary sources for information about or referring...

source and it is often used to make claims about living persons. Yet WP:BLPPRIMARY strongly discourages using primary sources alone for BLP material. But...

insight. I'd argue that both sources are ok; per WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY, the government source is only supporting statements of direct fact (in...

Hough." I had removed the childs name per WP:BLPPRIVACY as well as per WP:BLPPRIMARY as other than tabloids no one reported on the child and Chloe herself...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) sourcing dependent on WP:BLPPRIMARY WP:BLPSPS WP:BLPSELFPUB 2 books are self-published, sourcing is largely...

vio becomes possible (essentially - treating Ahmed's words on Fox as WP:BLPPRIMARY vs. Sarsour). Icewhiz (talk) 09:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC) @Chrisvls:...

16 April 2012 (UTC) Be careful with using birth cirtificates. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC) While it says...

source is neither self-published nor a primary source, as WP:BLPSPS and WP:BLPPRIMARY preclude self-published or primary sources being used as sources for information...

get rid of there. __ E L A Q U E A T E 19:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY is clear. Primary sources like that are not allowed for supporting claims...

Niteshift36 (talk) 19:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC) That just came up above and WP:BLPPRIMARY says we cannot use these sources for living persons. OR and neutrality...

none at all. SarahStierch (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2012 (UTC) See WP:BLPPRIMARY. We shouldn't be using primary documents to support private personal details...

making them aware of this issue, but Wikipedia is not for advocacy. WP:BLPPRIMARY specifically states that "trial transcripts and other court records, or...

their legal name). General Ization Talk 22:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY is extremely clear that we do not source information from primary sources/public...

Elkerton. WP:COMMONNAME doesn't require use of the official name and WP:BLPPRIMARY says to not use public documents as primary sources. If a reliable published...

extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy. On C The Journal articles from of the American Psychoanalytic...

2020 (UTC) No, this suggestion would be a violation of WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY. Original research is not a substitute for secondary reliable sourcing...

in general would take over, which makes it more of a content dispute. BLPPRIMARY exists to make sure editors don't engage in original research and synthesis...

OR if the salary is simply listed, but it would definitely violate WP:BLPPRIMARY IMO. Especially for tax records and similar. On the more general issue...

the wording of BLPPRIMARY is as you say, to avoid the use of fan-crufty or damaging material from court cases in BLPs, why does BLPPRIMARY not say that...

Thanks. David in DC (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC) In short, no. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. Court records should not be used as references for anything related to...

00:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC) Regarding citations to court documents, see WP:BLPPRIMARY It is not used to support anything at all. Supported by the otherc supplied...

are completely banned as sources in biographies of living persons by WP:BLPPRIMARY, as they should be. Contrary to your statements above, affidavits also...

reliable but primary source, content that complied with WP:PRIMARY, WP:BLPPRIMARY, WP:BLPSPS, WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:OR, I would revert them, warn them and...

used as a citation source? I ask just in case it might fall foul of WP:BLPPRIMARY, and be classed as a public record. I am thinking of this link for use...

citing only to the court record (an unpublished opinion) violates WP:BLPPRIMARY. Apparently, that hasn't penetrated.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2012...

suitable for a birth date since it sounds like it's a violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, some sort of birth record e.g. from a hospital or US state or something...

second source is a free replacement based on the same information. WP:BLPPRIMARY says we shouldn't make assertions about living people based on public...

documents are not ok. For a corporation, there is no set policy I can see. WP:BLPPRIMARY says: "Exercise caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts...

for this information in order to use it in a Wikipedia article, see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which explicitly cautions against using such material. AndyTheGrump (talk)...

conclusion that these were poorly sourced WP:BLP articles violating WP:BLPPRIMARY. And ALL of these Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons articles have...

00:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC) Regarding citations to court documents, see WP:BLPPRIMARY It is not used to support anything at all. Supported by the otherc supplied...

it isn't policy. Policy is at WP:OR/WP:PRIMARY, and importantly at WP:BLPPRIMARY. An iPhone-photo of a document, uploaded by an anoymous user to Wikipedia...

January 2021 (UTC) @IdreamofJeanie:, Almost entirely correct: Per WP:BLPPRIMARY, producing court papers won't help document this position. We need significant...

the source of this information is a clear and blatant violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. It's no different than using court documents, birth certificates, or...

this question, but did notice the following tangentially related in WP:BLPPRIMARY: Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public...

based on reliable secondary sources without reading anything into the WP:BLPPRIMARY source? If not, what is gained by stating they did not announce the date...

three competing sources. One we cannot use, because it would violate WP:BLPPRIMARY (nonetheless, good find as well). The second seems to be valid in the...

only info from her official website is her height); and anyway, per WP:BLPPRIMARY, primary sources can't always be excluded. "All the other stuff is just...

WP:BLP#Avoid_misuse_of_primary_sources. Tom Reedy (talk) 04:03, 7 December 2019 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY is explicit in saying "Do not use public records that include personal...

suitable here. Richard Nevell (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY Hi, simple question. So, there's a dispute over this edit. The edit claims...

(talk) 12:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC) I think this might fall under WP:BLPPRIMARY, which says Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use...

in Anita Sarkeesian is not a statement of fact, is an WP:RSOPINION. WP:BLPPRIMARY advices us to "exercise extreme caution in using primary sources"; and...

is the RS and not the BLP noticeboard, but this seems to fall under WP:BLPPRIMARY. Also, consider two things: Do we really need to know where this person...

records, tax records, phone books, or any other primary source covered by BLPPRIMARY and BLPPRIVACY. I recommend removing them at once, leaving a clear indication...

then they are (with minor carveouts for augmentation) disallowed per WP:BLPPRIMARY.Icewhiz (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC) They superb documents for research...

Mohamedou Ould Slahi is a detainee at Guantanamo. An editor is claiming that BLPPRIMARY#Misuse_of_primary_sources prevents using U.S. District and Circuit Court...

optimistic scenario, it would be considered a "source" that is WP:BLPSPS, WP:BLPPRIMARY or a combination of the two which makes its claims not really reliable...

January 2017 (UTC) Read WP:BLPSPS - basically wordpress blog = no. WP:BLPPRIMARY would also generally prevent the use of leaked documents (as a primary...

attacking Hays, their bitter enemy. The correct guideline here is WP:BLPPRIMARY, which says no legal documents. Instead, we rely on third party discussion...

on editors' interpretations of primary sources such as these. See WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:PRIMARY for the relevant policies. Hut 8.5 18:00, 19 November 2020...

only source is a blog post and the subject's personal website per WP:BLPPRIMARY and other parts of BLP. It looks the initial investigation etc in 2016...

Court records in particular are explicitly forbidden as sources by WP:BLPPRIMARY. If someone's only "claim to fame" is allegations like these then we shouldn't...

subject of Roger Kimball's views on Trump". Looking at WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY, there is no overt prohibition on primary sources, merely a stipulation...

However (and now somewhat off topic) I wanted to remind everyone that WP:BLPPRIMARY clearly authorizes the use of self published material so long as it isn't...

marriage and census records. Some of these sources may be usable under WP:BLPPRIMARY, but secondary sources, where available, are usually preferred. Ancestry...

not a question of reliability. Primary sources cannot be used per WP:BLPPRIMARY. The policy is very clear. Slp1 (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC) It’s...

or may not have done, then do not use them as the sole source per WP:BLPPRIMARY which says "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other...

Dáil records. We should never use primary sources in that was per WP:BLPPRIMARY. As to whether Village Magazine is enough, I would lean no especially...

State Department document it's based on, which may be excluded by WP:BLPPRIMARY. We need extra-good RS to put "contentious material about living persons"...

into Original Research. -- GreenC Thinking about this further: Under WP:BLPPRIMARY, we should not use court records to support assertions about a living...

to be written about it. As for Valentino himself, WP:INTERVIEWS are WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPSELFPUB types of sources that might be acceptable in support...

on WP:BLPPRIVACY for birth dates. Also, the misuse of WP:BLPRS and WP:BLPPRIMARY as well. --49.150.96.127 (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC) Atlanta (magazine)...

support text about bankruptcy, etc. I've tried to make the point about WP:BLPPRIMARY, to no avail; I'm currently at the limit of 3RR... Nomoskedasticity (talk)...

articles about living people needs to be done with extreme care per WP:BLPPRIMARY. Finally, since you seem to have just started editing yesterday and the...

reliable secondary source or of the written decision on the case. WP:BLPPRIMARY specifically requires us to exercise extreme caution in using primary...

most of these are primary sources, and many of which run afoul of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Zaereth (talk) 03:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC) I one hundred percent understand...

court doc, offering context and explanation. Also, please take note of WP:BLPPRIMARY, specifically "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or...

material on this page supposedly based on court documents, contrary to WP:BLPPRIMARY (see [7] and [8]) apparently misunderstanding the role of primary and...

primary, which is inappropriate for contentious statements in a BLP (see WP:BLPPRIMARY). Please do not revert without consensus as that would violate WP:BLPREMOVE...

articles about living people, but they need to be used carefully per WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPSELFPUB. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC) is there...

then it's probably undue and/or synth to cite it directly. I assume WP:BLPPRIMARY could apply here as well. Nblund talk 15:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC) No it...

was obtained from a primary source (such as government records). See WP:BLPPRIMARY. 2) The subject is a minor. 3) The information is wrong, and they (or...

Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#Resolving_conflicts_between_WP:BLPPRIMARY_&_WP:BLPEDIT/. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:57, 21 December 2022 (UTC)...

Regarding the Press TV source, it is primary source material. On this, WP:BLPPRIMARY states: "Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable...

provided meets the guidelines regarding reliable sources at-least 1 isWP:BLPPRIMARY. Theworm777 (talk) 11:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Sarah Marie Johnson (edit |...

prudent to correct.. Nickmxp (talk) 00:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC) Per WP:BLPPRIMARY: "Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial...

Particularly with court documents, you must be extremely careful. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. It is always best to use secondary sources. It's very easy to get into...

(talk • contribs) 01:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC) I removed some per WP:BLPPRIMARY. There may be more BLP-violations in there, and WP:PROPORTION should be...

Sportfan5000 (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Blatant disregard for WP:BLPPRIMARY. Good job removing it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)...

(talk) 20:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC) That's a primary source, and per WP:BLPPRIMARY, extreme care should be exercised when using primary sources in a biography...

11:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC) Best practice is to avoid court documents as WP:BLPPRIMARY sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other...

nor is it a reasonable approach. Contrary to what you're saying, WP:BLPPRIMARY does not bar primary sources - it merely exhorts us to use extreme caution...

one entry is a non-notable murder cited entirely to a court case / WP:BLPPRIMARY violating sources. Others are literally "guy who believed in UFOs killed...

Catfishingongoogledoc, you should check these links: WP:BLP, WP:THESUN and WP:BLPPRIMARY. They apply to convicted criminals as well. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...

WP:Verifiability and WP:BLPPRIMARY, while WP:EXCEPTIONAL has some influence in this ongoing dispute. I quote from WP:BLPPRIMARY: Exercise extreme caution...

claiming this, but you have not provided any evidence for it, and per WP:BLPPRIMARY Do not use public records that include personal details. Hemiauchenia...

the Medical Corps of the navy, which the article subject is). While WP:BLPPRIMARY does not outright proscribe the use of primary sources in biographies...

it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Does it fail WP:BLPPRIMARY? Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC) @Bretonbanquet: Yes...

blank sections and random non-notable people who do not meet WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:SIGCOV. AldezD (talk) 12:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC) Not done The article...

documents ... what do the secondary reliable reports say? Please see WP:BLPPRIMARY - lookinf at the article there are a lot of primary PDF's and a court...

judge or a jury has done so.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:22, 10 August 2012 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY currently forbids the citation of any public record that contains personal...

8 November 2017 (UTC) Could someone check this bio with respect to WP:BLPPRIMARY? Sorry I can't look at it more at the moment. Best, --joe deckertalk 01:58...

AfD now. – Teratix ₵ 08:08, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Bender235 is violating WP:BLPPRIMARY by edit-warring to include a primary-sourced birthdate on BLP Bryna Kra...

talk page a link to a scan of it. I have rev-deleted that, because of WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIVACY. Apart from the privacy aspect, the WP:RSN archives...

record of the same type that WP:BLPPRIMARY tells us to avoid. The court website is to be avoided, period, per WP:BLPPRIMARY. —C.Fred (talk) 04:48, 14 February...

involved. I think the lack of reliable non-primary sources would invoke WP:BLPPRIMARY. Unfortunately, it looks like a mess to strike/redact all the back and...

a soapbox or to right great wrongs. As for your specific allegations, BLPPRIMARY says that court documents and other public documents cannot be used as...

2018 (UTC) You've got other problems there - sourcing problems. See WP:BLPPRIMARY. For privacy reasons, we limit ourselves to birth information already...

4 July 2015 (UTC) I removed everything cited to a court case per WP:BLPPRIMARY and virtually all of it was negative. I also removed comments that reflected...

in this case? NewWorldOrder2017 (talk) 01:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY is applicable here - Do not use public records that include personal details...

they claim to be verified by a non-reliable source, which falls under WP:BLPPRIMARY. I first got wind of this via a topic started on the article's talk page...

caution" as per WP:BLPPRIMARY, and I want to check my WP:NOR logic. The first paragraph about 2001 Australian federal election is WP:BLPPRIMARY but strait-forward...

material from the talk page of this article that was in violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY. Extra eyes welcome. --JN466 20:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Sahar Sarid (edit |...

I agree that the primary-sourced stuff about RICO doesn't belong - WP:BLPPRIMARY clearly prohibits using court documents, etc. as sources in BLPs. However...

(UTC) I've removed several citations to prison and court records per WP:BLPPRIMARY. I've also re-worded "without trial" to hew better to its source: he was...

Seems like a cut-and-dried case of WP:BLPPRIMARY to me. — Strongjam (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC) WP:BLPPRIMARY merely advises caution when using primary...

BLPs, as they are primary documents. However, I've just been reading WP:BLPPRIMARY and it seems that might not be the case. It all depends what "assertion"...

Additionally, using a databased trademark filing is a violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, as that is a public document. Do not brush aside legitimate concerns...

problem with sourcing, even with these names redacted. In violation of WP:BLPPRIMARY, the list cites a '(notarized) Declaration' as a source regarding two...

Court records in particular are explicitly forbidden as sources by WP:BLPPRIMARY. If someone's only "claim to fame" is allegations like these then we shouldn't...

only info from her official website is her height); and anyway, per WP:BLPPRIMARY, primary sources can't always be excluded. "All the other stuff is just...

brought to my attention that a source had been included that broke WP:BLPPRIMARY, namely public records from ITSA, the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia...

be used unless they have been discussed by a secondary source. See WP:BLPPRIMARY full text included with my highlights: "Exercise extreme caution in using...

raw video is a primary source, which is not to be used in a BLP per WP:BLPPRIMARY; (ii) the transcription and editing of a portion of the video by the editor...

glance to me that was a clear and simple violation of WP:PRIMARY and/or WP:BLPPRIMARY, since the controversy at Arxiv is sourced to Arxiv itself, and there...

reasons, we avoid using court documents as references. Please review WP:BLPPRIMARY for the exact policy language. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:18...

for over a year. This time it was unfounded allegations (violating WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPCRIME) that a related party was an abuser, which made it two...

post [18] is being used as a source here [19], I believe it violates BLPPRIMARY, OR and FRINGE (since it implies that the grand jury was only involved...

January 2013 (UTC) Court documents should generally not be used; see WP:BLPPRIMARY. That said, there are some valid references to allegations of witness...

directly [23] constitutes an abuse of primary sources contrary to WP:BLPPRIMARY (as seen on the pro-Russian propaganda site 'Off-Guardian' [24] [25] [26]...

of unreferenced information, as well as one source which violated WP:BLPPRIMARY. I've also tagged for more sources and added to my watchlist. GiantSnowman...

Domestic Violence Registry being used as a source!?! That looks like a clear BLPPRIMARY violation. I would say that, in the interest of BLP, this article should...

Lepidoptera (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC) On the contrary, please see WP:BLPPRIMARY. And while you're there, WP:BLPCRIME will be useful too. §FreeRangeFrogcroak...

article Democracy Now!. Previously Miradre had blantantly violated WP:BLPPRIMARY by adding content to Democracy Now! about Amy Goodman drawn from a public...

bio. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 23:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Comment (WP:BLPPRIMARY) concerns: there are bio details only supported by autobiographies and...

On RS grounds, we can include the photo as a 'primary source' under WP:BLPPRIMARY. Finally, chain of custody for a free image becomes trivial once initial...

associated with her) over some negative information. WP:UNDUE and WP:BLPPRIMARY concerns. I've asked User:Mcc1270 to comment here, and the other account...

traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses." BLPPRIMARY - SummerPhD (talk) 14:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC) It may be worth noting that...

poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. WP:BLPPRIMARY Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts...

removed a large amount of biographical details provided by FreeBMD per WP:BLPPRIMARY (he's probably deceased, but since he could be living, he has BLP protections)...