ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

or in bad faith, is grounds for immediate blocking. Shortcuts WP:BLPRSWP:BLPRS WP:BLPSOURCESWP:BLPSOURCES WP:BLPSOURCEWP:BLPSOURCE Wikipedia's sourcing...

TWL) Unreferenced BLP whose only source is a primary source. This fails WP:BLPRS criteria making the article meet criteria 9 for deletion at WP:DEL-REASON...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:BLPRS, WP:SIGCOV. Married to an actress WP:BIORELATED. Qualifies as WP:PROMO....

relies on sources of doubtful reliability and independence. Does not meet WP:BLPRS. Mccapra (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

pieces in outlets of doubtful independence and reliability. Does not pass WP:BLPRS. Mccapra (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

and Martin Dixon-Green. I think we should be especially careful about WP:BLPRS given that these are young people (tho, Dixon-Martin has no age listed)...

July 2023 (UTC) Delete: can't find any in-depth coverage that meets WP:BLPRS online. article reads like a promo/resume. ARandomName123 (talk) 01:47,...

empathism from the article. I don't think its source was adequate for WP:BLPRS. That leaves his professorial position and his books. Among edited volumes...

those sources and replaced them with better sources where applicable. WP:BLPRS is very clear about using reliable sources only. 11WB (talk) 19:05, 26 December...

in 2006, where the policies were more lax. Either way, does not meet WP:BLPRS either. - RichT|C|E-Mail 10:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

deletion because unsourced information should be removed imminently per WP:BLPRS. The only thing close to an independent source is clearly a fan-site. However...

improve. The draft article needs better sourcing to demonstrate notability. See WP:GNG and WP:BLPRS. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)...

reasoning. WP:BLPRS makes it clear that unsourced information should be removed. Either you or Masato.harada should proceed citing WP:BLPRS and or WP:RS...

username as they are not Alani Santamarina and also advised on WP:N, WP:BLPRS and WP:PSCOI - - RichT|C|E-Mail 09:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Vinod ingle (talk ·...

lot of the sources aren't at par with what I'd expect when looking for WP:BLPRS, I do believe there are atleast three reliable sources that satisfy the...

in good faith, though I can't say I personally agree after reviewing WP:BLPRS, especially since the source is not tied to potentially contentious statements...

verifable and well sourced as seen WP:BLPRS. Since this article fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT and violates WP:BLPRS Mongillo does not warrant a dedicated article...

close relationship between Hutchins and Jenner is not confirmed as per WP:BLPRS afaics. Count Count (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Delete for now - They...

citation or as common evidence for a biography of a living person WP:BLP, WP:BLPRS If you remove these citations in addition to the IMDB citations, it leaves...

complying with WP:SYNTH, WP:OR, WP:BLPRS nor WP:V, among others. Two that are especially relevant here are WP:V and WP:BLPRS. Instead of quoting both,I'll...

violating WP:BLP, WP:QS and other verifiability issues, WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:IS, WP:BLPRS, WP:REDFLAG, WP:BIO (notability), and other policies that would mandate...

which are unsourced and thus fails WP:VERIFY. WP:BLP, and specifically WP:BLPRS, means that we have to have sources for any information which is potentially...

proposed text does does not meet the requirements of WP:ABOUTSELF or WP:BLPRS because it contains claims about other living persons: "You who came from...

passing mentions) and meet the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and WP:BLPRS standards. Rather than calling me a spammer, post a response next to each...

to Diffs of the user's reverts 16:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC) "Rvv per WP:BLPRS" 08:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC) "Only two reliable sources are cited in this...

the creation of a BLP article based on one of the worst violations of WP:BLPRS I've seen for some time - it's deleted now, so you won't be able to see...

still seeing well-meaning edits that don't meet the requirements of WP:BLPRS. Would this article be a good candidate for pending changes protection?...

certainly not me, is going to use Miranda Yardley as a source anywhere near BLPRS. But I'd also point out that Fiona Robertson, the National Women's and Equalities...

inappropriate information in WP:BLP articles, including that unsupported by WP:BLPRS may be removed. This must be done in accordance with policy, however (others...

dubious practice in the case of direct quotes). The source is not a WP:BLPRS for such a negative editorial opinion. [180], 06:15, 17 December 2020: Tagged...

not completely clear to me which are the limits for a reliable source WP:BLPRS and whats is relevant infomartion about a living person who is not just...

to redirect the page or not, why? The greatest issue I could see is WP:BLPRS, yet, to the extent that could be corroborated so far, has been corroborated...

the Russian state, which is itself an actor in US politics, violates WP:BLPRS and is sanctionable. I can see the argument for it, but I'd like to have...

working on fixing it. You can remove it right now if you think it fails WP:BLPRS but it only becomes a matter that requires protection (by a different admin)...

with existing policies such as WP:RSCONTEXT, WP:PARITY, WP:FRINGE, and WP:BLPRS. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC) The following discussion is closed...

English source that was provided and tell me whether you think it meets WP:BLPRS, or whether it's just a nationalist rant. I suspect the these partisan sources...

determining things through consensus building. Additionally, to quote WP:BLPRS, any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to...

elaborate in terms of stratifying the "literature" than what we have now at WP:BLPRS). I have no idea what the community went though to get MEDRS built, but...

doesn't count. I think that consensus has been established. In light of WP:BLPRS, I have decided to remove all material that implies or depends upon the...

thank for their assistance) also attempted to deal with the issue. I see WP:BLPRS, WP:COI and WP:SOCK issues, among others. Also, there are a couple more...

November 2022 (UTC) @David Fuchs: I know Dronebogus didn't bring it up, but WP:BLPRS and WP:BLPTALK apply here. RAN1 (talk) 04:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC) I think...

what shortcut that is). The rest are not meeting sourcing policy (e.g. WP:BLPRS) and have POV issues. However, I'm not seeing where this was discussed with...

more reliable source references to the Zeyan Shafiq as per WP:RS and WP:BLPRS and WP:SIGCOV. It should meet the basic WP:GNG to fit in. Regarding paid...

an in-line reference. This is non-negotiable. Please have a read of WP:BLPRS and WP:INCITE, and for a tutorial on citing see WP:INTREFVE. Qcne (talk)...

{{Blp1source}}, {{Blp more sources}}, {{BLP+}}, {{BLP more citations}}, {{BLPR}}, {{Blpr}}, {{BLP citations needed}}, {{BLP more citations needed}}, {{+blp}}...

Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 14:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC) Delete the wp:WP:BLPRS is not satisfied with used sources.Also as WP:BLP1E say, Wikipedia is not...

important figure [...] by peers standard, but that too has to be attested in a BLPRS. I can't find evidence that he (and some number of other people?) won an...

while for me, so I honestly don't know the answer, but looking over WP:BLPRS, I have some concerns about artnet, flavorwire or even the Huffington Post...

pieces in outlets of doubtful independence and reliability. Does not pass WP:BLPRS. Mccapra (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Idegon (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC) @John from Idegon: Reading WP:BLPRS, "all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged...

more reliable source references to the Zeyan Shafiq as per WP:RS and WP:BLPRS and WP:SIGCOV. It should meet the basic WP:GNG to fit in. Regarding paid...

Musical Express (NME) [ https://www.nme.com/ ] meet the requirements of WP:BLPRS? Claimed to be a reliable source for BLP information at Talk:Cavetown (musician)‎#RfC...

violating WP:BLP, WP:QS and other verifiability issues, WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:IS, WP:BLPRS, WP:REDFLAG, WP:BIO (notability), and other policies that would mandate...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:BLPRS, WP:SIGCOV. Married to an actress WP:BIORELATED. Qualifies as WP:PROMO....

in 2006, where the policies were more lax. Either way, does not meet WP:BLPRS either. - RichT|C|E-Mail 10:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

in good faith, though I can't say I personally agree after reviewing WP:BLPRS, especially since the source is not tied to potentially contentious statements...

and Martin Dixon-Green. I think we should be especially careful about WP:BLPRS given that these are young people (tho, Dixon-Martin has no age listed)...

discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. As per WP:BLPRS, for reliability on English Wikipedia, the biographical section is less...

WP:BLPRS. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Again, Does The Spinoff [ https://thespinoff.co.nz ] meet the requirements of WP:BLPRS? --Guy...

unsourced with zero in-line citations. This is strictly against the WP:BLPRS guidelines. So your draft would fail on this aspect too. Qcne (talk) 08:17...

citation or as common evidence for a biography of a living person WP:BLP, WP:BLPRS If you remove these citations in addition to the IMDB citations, it leaves...

while for me, so I honestly don't know the answer, but looking over WP:BLPRS, I have some concerns about artnet, flavorwire or even the Huffington Post...

Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 14:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC) Delete the wp:WP:BLPRS is not satisfied with used sources.Also as WP:BLP1E say, Wikipedia is not...

Pretty much, yes. Re: "is the huffington post a reliable source for this WP:BLPRS claim? Per WP:RSP the answer is no. Can you find a better source? --Guy...

exceeding other income. 5 An annual publication from People, so might fail WP:BLPRS. 7 & 8 O Books was the original name and is now an imprint of John Hunt...

important figure [...] by peers standard, but that too has to be attested in a BLPRS. I can't find evidence that he (and some number of other people?) won an...

reliable, independent sources to indicate sustained coverage over time. See WP:BLPRS and WP:NRV. Nobody here is saying that her work isn't important, only that...

is the Daily Beast, then it simply doesn't meet the requirements of a WP:BLPRS. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 03:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Agreed. Tabloids such as...

not demonize or attack specific people. This doesn't mean that BLP and BLPRS are not potential concerns. —PaleoNeonate – 04:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)...

reliable source, as Wikipedia doesn't go just off of what you know. See WP:BLPRS. ––FormalDude talk 11:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC) In addition to what's already...

attributed opinions about entertainment products (films and games) and is not WP:BLPRS about people, or WP:RS for any other topic. Are there instances where you...

claims that "WP:BLPRS is clear that BLP articles must not exist if they do not cite reliable sources." I'm not sure what part of BLPRS the closer is citing...

coverage that you are quoting are not used on Wikipedia. Please read WP:BLPRS and WP:RS. Venkat TL (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Restore The subject...

this included "contentious material" I'd have a different opinion (per WP:BLPRS). Basically, I think that your views on WP:GNG vs WP:SNG is somewhat out-of-step...

noticeably, deliberate violations of WP:COPYVIO, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:BLPRS, and WP:NPOV. We shouldn't be letting our hatred of politicians write this...

blacklist. WP:BLP is the policy governing biographies of living persons, and WP:BLPRS calls for a strict reading of the verifiability policy and reliable sources...

view of better analysis is generally considered WP:UNDUE. When it's a WP:BLPRS issue, even generally reliable sources that are not considered by all of...

violation likely to be challenged again and again in the future per WP:BLPRS to say that they are dead when no reliable source can verify that they are...

RSN archive 190 you said you think filmibeat.com should not be used as a BLPRS. What do you think of its use in these articles? - Brianhe (talk) 19:15...

claims that "WP:BLPRS is clear that BLP articles must not exist if they do not cite reliable sources." I'm not sure what part of BLPRS the closer is citing...

inserting the claims to Mitski's Wikipedia entry. It also seems to violate WP:BLPRS, because any reputable sources that have been cited are ones reporting the...

"controversy" section you keep adding has not be reliably sourced; per WP:BLPRS, obscure pop culture sites are not appropriate sources for biographies of...

sexuality based on a Tweet, which does not support the information. Per WP:BLPRS. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Declined – Warn the user appropriately...

coverage that you are quoting are not used on Wikipedia. Please read WP:BLPRS and WP:RS. Venkat TL (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Restore The subject...

titillating claims. You more have to look at this in terms of WP:BLPBALANCE, WP:BLPRS, WP:BLPGOSSIP (and feedback loops), and WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE. Most of the...

this included "contentious material" I'd have a different opinion (per WP:BLPRS). Basically, I think that your views on WP:GNG vs WP:SNG is somewhat out-of-step...

promotion or how-to, or if it's to support rants against people (not WP:BLPRS), it should be avoided... It's also still possible to WP:ATTRIBUTE despite...

never received the BLP ds/alert so I'll issue one with a mention of WP:BLPRS. —PaleoNeonate – 22:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Seth Andrews#Views on religion...

violate this policy on WP:BLPPRIVACY for birth dates. Also, the misuse of WP:BLPRS and WP:BLPPRIMARY as well. --49.150.96.127 (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2021...

Lifeline cancellation of clementine ford's speech under violations of WP:BLPRS, WP:BLPSPS and WP:GRAPEVINE. These links should all be removed as they are...

November 2021 (UTC) Support blurb now. I respect the application of WP:BLPRS to this project. However, it's counterintuitive to demand further refinement...

so many Wiki policies in general, and for a WP:BLP in particular. See WP:BLPRS, WP:BLPSPS & WP:PRIMARY (source third party letters to editor). Also WP:SYN...

in the article. JunoSpriteRocket (talk) 18:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC) Per WP:BLPRS, "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly...

deprecated source (i.e. unreliable beyond doubt), and is unsuited to BLPs (WP:BLPRS). It's actually weird that you would insist, because there is an explicit...

think that above source is usable? I had difficulty finding related WP:BLPRS and posted a comment on the article's talk page. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate –...

twitter accusations themselves. This is a clear violation of BLPCRIME, BLPRS, BLPPRIMARY, and SPS. I have removed the section, but have a feeling it...

immediately and without discussion"? In my opinion, it is a clear misuse of BLPRS rules. Aren't there any other options to contest information some users...

I removed some material from this article per WP:BLPRS and was instantly summarily reverted. I don't wanna get into an edit war even though I'm following...

WP:DUE by consensus and that is well cited to reliable sources (WP:CITE, WP:BLPRS), if those sources are retracted because of errors they made, the related...

BLPs, so such inclusion requires a citation to a reliable source (per WP:BLPRS and WP:CATV), and the WP:ONUS is on those seeking inclusion to demonstrate...

(talk) 21:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC) But it can be all or nothing. That's why WP:BLPRS and WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE and WP:PROVEIT exist as policies. It's not my job...

what I understand). Here we can finally discuss policy, namely WP:DUE, WP:BLPRS (particularly WP:BLPREMOVE), and WP:RS/QUOTE. We need to remember that subjects...

contentious material about a living person must be removed immediately. · WP:BLPRS: Behindwoods.com is not a reliable source for contentious biographical claims...

is unacceptable. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC) WP:BLPRS and WP:BLPREMOVE say that contentious material must be cited with a reliable...

with an unnamed editor a top-tier source? BTW, the relevant policy is WP:BLPRS.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 12:48, 10 March 2026 (UTC)...

about living persons. CGTN's descriptions of living persons would fail WP:BLPRS (which "applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or...

TWL) Unreferenced BLP whose only source is a primary source. This fails WP:BLPRS criteria making the article meet criteria 9 for deletion at WP:DEL-REASON...

September 2025 (UTC) I understand and I agree! After reading WP:BLP and WP:BLPRS I felt that the source was questionable at best for such a sensitive issue...

lot of the sources aren't at par with what I'd expect when looking for WP:BLPRS, I do believe there are atleast three reliable sources that satisfy the...

diff). Could someone with knowledge of this policy please explain why WP:BLPRS doesn't apply in this case or perform an extended confirmed WP:BLPREMOVE...

(talk) 07:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC) With respect to contentious material, WP:BLPRS notes "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly...

gossip, and using edit summaries variously referring to BLP, BLPGOSSIP, BLPRS, BLPREMOVE, and lastly ONUS. Discussions on both talk pages have not resolved...

ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC) A key policy is WP:BLPRS considering many of the files released by the DOJ were tip-line submissions...

1969 rather than 1970" is either unduly self-serving or exceptional. WP:BLPRS requires only a "reliable, published source"; it doesn't say that it must...

sourcing definitely qualifies as "poorly sourced" and removed-on-sight per WP:BLPRS. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC) We should always used the best...

uncritical. In the current state. It is a blatant violation of WP:OR and WP:BLPRS. My attempts to ask for Reliable sources and rationale behind the statement...

reliable, independent sources to indicate sustained coverage over time. See WP:BLPRS and WP:NRV. Nobody here is saying that her work isn't important, only that...

by two users [18][19][20]. Is this WP:OR? And is it compatible with WP:BLPRS? Note the following: The text of the source doesn't mention Katchanovski...

tag? Thanks, FactOrOpinion (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC) Per WP:BLPRS, contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced...

those sources and replaced them with better sources where applicable. WP:BLPRS is very clear about using reliable sources only. 11WB (talk) 19:05, 26 December...

must be on grounds listed within the BLP policy i.e. does not comply with BLPRS not does not comply with ONUS, or does not comply with VNOT. I'll admit...

replace them with other reliable sources per the relevant policy at WP:BLPRS (such as the timing of a show's official ending credits, BTVA, official...

people, we should immediately remove any material sourced in that way (WP:BLPRS) You are yet to demonstrate that we should change our minds. Szmenderowiecki...

against using sources that attribute material to anonymous sources and WP:BLPRS states that When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have...

July 2026 (UTC) To update, I have removed the section after re-reading WP:BLPRS. I still think it would benefit from someone more experienced but maybe...

deletion because unsourced information should be removed imminently per WP:BLPRS. The only thing close to an independent source is clearly a fan-site. However...

"marginally reliable source", is poor sourcing, and thus shouldn't be used as WP:BLPRS. Perhaps we should expand WP:MREL to say that explicitly, but most editors...

July 2023 (UTC) Delete: can't find any in-depth coverage that meets WP:BLPRS online. article reads like a promo/resume. ARandomName123 (talk) 01:47,...

person is no reason to retain the material. See, and feel free to cite, WP:BLPRS. -- Hoary (talk) 23:23, 7 February 2026 (UTC) Thank you. Coffeeurbanite...

December 2024 (UTC) Thank you for the question, @Sparkle & Fade. Per WP:BLPRS (specifically: contentious material about living persons that is unsourced...

'unsourced claims' regarding controversy should be deleted immediately, per WP:BLPRS. AndyTheGrump (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Ok, thanks for that. For...

have to place the references in the article, supporting each statement (WP:BLPRS might help in this instance). Also remember that Wikipedia is not a crystal...

which are unsourced and thus fails WP:VERIFY. WP:BLP, and specifically WP:BLPRS, means that we have to have sources for any information which is potentially...

empathism from the article. I don't think its source was adequate for WP:BLPRS. That leaves his professorial position and his books. Among edited volumes...

people must (with a few exceptions, not relevant here) be sourced, see WP:BLPRS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:11, 6 June...

brand-new Ymberlen account.[29] I removed the text from the article per WP:BLPRS because I think it beats WP:3RR. See Special:Diff/1244038066 if you are...

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources as "generally unreliable". WP:BLPRS applies to noticeboards too. Could you please respond to the concerns raised...

recognize WP:RGW. Once again - since the content is in violation of WP:BLPRS I don't think my reversion would run afoul of the 3 revert rule, but I also...

provenance is the basis for all claims of DSD and this is so far away from WP:BLPRS, WP:MEDRS and, frankly, the assumption of medical privacy as to be wholly...

somewhere) do not meet the criteria for a good quality reliable source. WP:BLPRS states all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged...

Bbno$ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Persistent WP:BLPRS issues from new and unregistered users adding unconfirmed information without...

BLP policy being violated with just a few comments (not understanding WP:BLPRS, WP:BLPSPS, WP:BALANCE). Sennecaster (Chat) 21:13, 30 December 2025 (UTC)...

blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Violated WP:BLPRS, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV in Anas al-Sharif, given a logged CTOP warning [110] by...

the sections above. While these sources are clearly inappropriate per WP:BLPRS, the claims being cited aren't particularly controversial or damaging, so...