ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

is not used. Shortcuts MOS:BOLDALTNAMESMOS:BOLDALTNAMES MOS:BOLDSYNMOS:BOLDSYN Only the first occurrence of the title and significant alternative names...

independent entity. Inappropriate bolding in lead Actually, no, per MOS:BOLDSYN, the abbreviation and alternate names should be in boldface. There are...

37.152.231.50 (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC) See MOS:BOLD and MOS:BOLDSYN. We only apply boldface, ever, for very specific reasons. Redundantly highlighting...

into the article. (Indeed, they will argue that is is "required" per MOS:BOLDSYN, and thus be trying to pit one guideline against the other, which is not...

misinterpretation of what BOLDSYN said. The exact same text is required to be boldfaced by BOLDTITLE, immediately above BOLDSYN. You can't play guideline...

notice posted to user's talk page: [68] Comments: Per WP:OFFICIAL and WP:BOLDSYN, it makes sense to have Malcolm X Park included in the title and bolded...

but if [[(]] redirects there, I understood that it had to be bold? (MOS:BOLDSYN --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC) I'm saying that...

guidelines that are clear about the matter (WP:NCGN#Alternative names/MOS:BOLDSYN). He then carried out another revert [119] pointing to his answer on the...

as "USA" except in a reference in its' own main article's lead as a MOS:BOLDSYN). There were probably others.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:37, 6 July 2018...

strict preference one way or the other. Yes, the example on the general MOS:BOLDSYN guideline lists the article title first, but it is not specific on which...

bolded. The French abbreviation should be included, but not bolded. See MOS:BOLDSYN and MOS:FORLANG. Naturally, there are exceptions. For instance, Médecins...

(UTC) @Biology AD I bolded the altname in the first sentence, per MOS:BOLDSYN. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC) I don't donate because...

more inline with the writing conventions of Wikipedia. As stated in MOS:BOLDSYN, significant alternative names should also be in boldface. Regardless of...

independent entity. Inappropriate bolding in lead Actually, no, per MOS:BOLDSYN, the abbreviation and alternate names should be in boldface. There are...

necessarily common) terms for the subject of an article, which is covered by MOS:BOLDSYN. I think this is at risk of setting a poor precedent (and somewhat ignores...

MOS:LEDE (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section (exists?) No 505 MOS:BOLDSYN (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section (exists?) No 506 MOS:LEADALT...

necessarily common) terms for the subject of an article, which is covered by MOS:BOLDSYN. I think this is at risk of setting a poor precedent (and somewhat ignores...

whatever) names back-to-back in the lead. We do this for reader benefit (MOS:BOLDSYN, "Am I at the right article? Why was I redirected here?"), but it also...

FLAGPLACEHOLDER 205 LDSJARGON 205 NUMBERRANGES 204 OUTUNIVERSE 204 SERIAL COMMA 204 BOLDSYN 204 INUNIVERSE 204 TABLECAPTION 204 NUMBERRANGE 204 DABANCHOR 204 DABIMG...

January 2024 (UTC) Partly done @Red-tailed hawk: MOS:BOLDTITLE and MOS:BOLDSYN are necessarily exceptions to MOS:AVOIDBOLD. You didn't just now notice...

the lead. "Parich Khel" should be bolded in the first sentence, per MOS:BOLDSYN. You linked a few times to Khel, which is actually a disambiguation page...

D'n'B-t -- 11:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) @ExclusiveEditor The guidance is at MOS:BOLDSYN, which says that bolding is reserved for significant alternative names...

deliberately or inadvertently, ignored or misinterpreted guidelines such as MOS:BOLDSYN (such as here) Even before they moved a years-long stable article that...