Wikipedia:COMMONTERM

Search Results: Wikipedia:COMMONTERM

Redirect to:

Wikipedia:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

From a shortcut: This is a redirect from a shortcut in any namespace to a page in any namespace.
- Shortcuts are wikilinked on community pages, talk pages, and edit summaries, but not in mainspace articles.

To a project page: This is a redirect from any page inside or outside of project (Wikipedia: or WP:) space to any page within the project namespace (not to a project talk page). The above category link leads to a list of redirects from inside project space. Redirects from outside project space are automatically sorted to Category:Redirects to project namespace.

To an embedded anchor: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to an embedded anchor on the redirect's target page.
- An {{anchor|anchor name}} or {{visible anchor}} template, an HTML element with id="anchor name", or an |id=anchor name parameter can be placed at the beginning of a paragraph, substituted into a section header, or inserted within a table. Anchors may also be old section headers that have since been renamed, in order to preserve existing internal and external links.
- Although section headers of the form ==(Header name)== act as anchors by default, with them use {{R to section}} instead.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Wikipedia:Article titles

Sabtu, 2026-07-18 00:45:13

Shortcuts WP:UCRNWP:UCRN WP:COMMONNAMEWP:COMMONNAME WP:COMMONTERMWP:COMMONTERM In Wikipedia, an article title is a natural-language word or expression...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennial grey

Sabtu, 2026-07-25 05:11:17

article, though understanding that 'millennial grey' is the likely most WP:COMMONTERM for said grey). I imagine there is extensive commentary on it in graphic...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 89

Rabu, 2026-05-13 18:39:30

rhetoric like calling the estate tax a "death tax" and runs dead against WP:COMMONTERM. I have been afraid that this is the source of TFD's opposition to use...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highly sensitive person

Minggu, 2025-11-23 02:39:38

problems, it is perfectly reasonable to choose one of the others." -WP:COMMONTERM, but I'm sure everyone's happy enough to keep "Highly Sensitive Person"...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 January 9

Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:12:47

problems, it is perfectly reasonable to choose one of the others." -WP:COMMONTERM, but I'm sure everyone's happy enough to keep "Highly Sensitive Person"...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Angela Lansbury/archive1

Selasa, 2023-02-28 07:05:23

been removed. I'll re-add it in, as I'm not sure this constitutes a WP:COMMONTERM, but I'm also happy to discuss the issue further with editors who disagree...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 55

Jumat, 2023-03-03 14:55:08

"loophole" is inherently loaded language They have been referred to WP:COMMONTERM, WP:POVTITLE, and WP:POVNAMING, but this hasn't resolved their issues...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 141

Sabtu, 2025-07-26 13:31:26

"official" one should be weighed against how widespread that usage is. See WP:COMMONTERM. Could I ask that parties now ask questions of those handling this dispute...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 July 17

Minggu, 2026-07-26 21:44:13

article, though understanding that 'millennial grey' is the likely most WP:COMMONTERM for said grey). I imagine there is extensive commentary on it in graphic...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2023

Rabu, 2023-03-01 04:47:53

been removed. I'll re-add it in, as I'm not sure this constitutes a WP:COMMONTERM, but I'm also happy to discuss the issue further with editors who disagree...

Click to read more »