ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

without unlisting or removing the actual discussion. Shortcuts WP:CSKWP:CSK WP:SKCRITWP:SKCRIT A discussion be closed as speedy keep in the following...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. as per WP:CSK #3. (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:25, 16 August 2021...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #2. Nom's only edits are creating AfDs for this and Paletten. AleatoryPonderings...

02:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK. The deletion rationale is completely erroneous (CSK#3) and the discussion is at the wrong deletion...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was redirect to FK ČSK Čelarevo. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:19, 18 November...

per WP:CSK#1. No deletion rationale is being proposed here. AfD is not cleanup. User:Let'srun 18:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1 or WP:CSK#3...

name. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Canadian School of Kuwait (CSK) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. As according to WP:CSK, point 1, a rationale has to be offered at AfD otherwise it may be speedily...

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: cricketguruu.com/ipl-2020-csk-squad-2020/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2020-09-10 03:52:35 (UTC): User Divyesh67...

restricting the table of contents to just the second heading level. " as CSK[2])" put ref outside parenthesis. "Mahendra Singh Dhoni [4] " don't have...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #1 - no rationale given for deletion nomination (non-admin closure) ‡ El...

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: cricketguruu.com/ipl-2020-csk-squad-2020/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2020-09-10 03:52:35 (UTC): User Divyesh67...

151.164 (t - c; 11) to w:de:CSK - CAD Systeme Kluwetasch (diff - DELETED) - Link: www.cskl.de/fileadmin/templates/img/csk/csk_logo.png (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed...

Nizhny Novgorod from de:SKIF Nischni Nowgorod HC SKIF, Luzhniki Moscow, CSK VSS Moscow, Viking Moscow, SKIF Moscow, SKIF Nizhni Novgorod SKSO Yekaterinburg...

merged in other criteria Wikipedia:CRD, criteria for redactions Wikipedia:CSK, criteria for speedy kept page. Wikipedia:R#DELETE, criteria for delete redirect...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #2. Nom's only edits are creating AfDs for this and Fredrik Svensk. AleatoryPonderings...

made such big rivalry like season 2 semifinal knockout or a fan burning csk flag. and few close matches in season 5 and 6. Only by writing atleast 2...

rationale here. Oblivy (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3 – I don't see anything resembling a rationale for deletion in the nomination...

22 November 2023 (UTC) Quality of reasoning can fall under CSK criterion 3. Absence is CSK 1, and you are correct that would not apply. There is indeed...

block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) DevenCSK (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...

than once.🆔 APO Discuss✍ 05:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK # 2–3. No valid reason for deletion has been given. @AppoWeb: Please stop...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:CSK #2 (non-admin closure) ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2026 (UTC) [Hide...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#3. Logogram9, if you want to nominate the redirect for deletion, use WP:RFD...

block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Tamilan CSK (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...

rationale for deletion has been provided here meaning this is eligible for WP:CSK closure, and the nominator has !voted to keep. An AfD cannot be opened for...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: nom is a blocked sockpuppet. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep as per WP:CSK #4. Delete votes were discounted as per zzuuzz’s comment. (non-admin closure)...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#4. ✗plicit 14:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. The nominator was evading a block (WP:CSK#4), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. (non-admin closure)...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

(UTC) Speedy keep as per WP:CSK point 1 cited by Joseph2302. Seany91 (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC) Leep passes GNG and CSK.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:50,...

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a sockpuppet, and closed per WP:CSK. – bradv🍁 23:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...

page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. The nominator was evading a block (WP:CSK#4), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. (non-admin closure)...

the AfD as 'speedy keep'. The process is standard and is explained in WP:CSK and WP:WITHDRAWN. Nsk92 (talk) 15:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Done! Thanks...

page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. The nominator was evading a block (WP:CSK#4), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. (non-admin closure)...

suggest that nomination was either frivolous or bad faith. Closing under WP:CSK criterion 3. Kinu t/c 05:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep as per WP:CSK #3. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC) AfDs...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. CSK#1, nominator fails to advance any argument for deletion. (non-admin closure)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy Keep per 'WP:CSK#5.(non-admin closure)  Ryan Vesey 03:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Operation...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: nom is a blocked sockpuppet. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. The nominator was evading a block (WP:CSK#4), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. (non-admin closure)...

should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOWCLOSE & WP:CSK#6. (non-admin closure) CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#1, the nominator only suggested a merge (rather than deletion or redirection)...

frivolous AfD. – robertsky (talk) 10:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC) Speedy keep under WP:CSK #1 or #3. No objectives to it being re-nominated though properly. -Kj cheetham...

substantive comments about the article were made, so this falls under WP:CSK#4. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 00:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: the nominator is a sock of a blocked user and no one else has commented...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK no. 1 (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:52, 7 March...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: nominator is globally locked as an LTA, and no one else has commented...

page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. The nominator was evading a block (WP:CSK#4), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. (non-admin closure)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎ per WP:CSK #4. ✗plicit 06:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#4. ✗plicit 23:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK crit. 4. No prejudice against speedy renomination by a user who's not evading...

Frost (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Keep, possibly speedy keep per WP:CSK #3 unless someone explains what's wrong with the seemingly independent, in-depth...

sufficient wp:sigcov.Dtt1 (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC) after reading WP:CSK suggested by @Doomsdayer520: I made it Keep from Speedy Keep. Dtt1Talk 08:47...

substantive comments about the article were made, so this falls under WP:CSK#4. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 23:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4; the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a previously blocked...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK no. 1: Nomination withdrawn and no opposing !votes (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian...

WP:CSK#6, since it's linked from the main page. TompaDompa (talk) 18:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC) Well according to the strict definition of WP:CSK#6, it...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #1. (non-admin closure)‎ Jfire (talk) 05:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC) [Hide...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: the nominator is a blocked sockpuppet and all other !votes are to keep...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep‎ (WP:CSK #1). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. No rationale for deletion given (WP:CSK#3). SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

deletion are completely erroneous and this should be speedily kept under WP:CSK#3. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep per WP:CSK, criteria 1, nomination withdrawn and no other delete opinions expressed...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#3; no accurate deletion rationale presented (talk page is not an orphan)...

improvement. Obvious COI from creator User:Writercsk (subject is "known as CSK" per the article). I wasn't able to locate any significant coverage of him...

(UTC) Speedy Keep due to absence of deletion rationale, as per C1 of WP:CSK CT55555 (talk) 00:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:SOAP, blatant pre-release...

false. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1: no valid rationale for deletion has been given. BilletsMauves€500 18:10...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep as per WP:CSK #3. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC) [Hide...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK no. 3; clearly the nominator has not looked, as suggested, at the French...

(UTC) Amkgp, you may close this discussion yourself as Speedy Keep per WP:CSK #1 :) --Dps04 (talk) Dps04 (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was procedural close per WP:CSK, nominated by a sockpuppet of a blocked user. ✗plicit 03:21, 12 May 2021...

have not placed a G5 tag on the page as User:Curbon7 commented, however WP:CSK(4) may apply.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 09:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC) The...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#1, the nominator only suggested a merge rather than deletion or redirection...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. Just merge it. – Joe (talk) 07:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep  – as per #1 of WP:CSK, FMSky fails to advance any argument whatsoever. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk)...

reason for deletion; see WP:NDRAFT etc. (I don't think this is eligible under CSK #4: reading the SPI, the nominator hasn't actually been confirmed to be a...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1, which applies when the nominator "fails to advance any argument for deletion...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: the nomination has been withdrawn and there are no other !votes to delete...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Closing per WP:CSK #4, any editor in good standing can renominate if required. (non-admin closure)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #2 (non-admin closure). Mephistophelian (contact) 05:04, 1 November 2012...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC) Procedural keep per WP:CSK#1 and/or WP:CSK#3—no valid deletion rationale is given. I do not have the time to...

substantive comments about the article were made, so this falls under WP:CSK#4. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 00:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

nomination.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep: per WP:CSK#3. Clearly meets WP:BAND#C2 three times. Toddst1 (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2020...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

closure) as withdrawn by nominator with no other support for deletion WP:CSK#1 Pi (Talk to me!) 03:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

there. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:CSK#1. No rationale is given for deletion. If the nominator believes that the...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. The nominator "fails to advance any argument for deletion"; merges can...

doesn't apply now because multiple people have voted delete in good faith WP:CSK - hako9 (talk) 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NACTOR. Geschichte...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#4 as the nominator was a sockpuppet of a blocked user and all non-keep participants...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: the nominator "fails to advance any argument for deletion or redirection...

Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. No valid rationale for deletion is presented-- afd is not cleanup, if...

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a sockpuppet, and closed per WP:CSK. – bradv🍁 23:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...

🆔 APO Discuss✍ 05:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per Mccapra, WP:CSK #2–3, and the absence of any rationale for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk)...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Closing per WP:CSK #4, any editor in good standing can renominate if required. (non-admin closure)...

this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Closed per WP:CSK#1. No identifiable deletion rationale. If you wish to boldly merge the contents...

page, and no other editors have recommended deletion or redirection (WP:CSK#1). (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 05:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Closing per WP:CSK #4, any editor in good standing can renominate if required. (non-admin closure)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. per WP:CSK#1, the nomination has been withdrawn. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:12, 28 January...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #4 applies as this was created by a block evading sockpuppet. There is no...

March 2026 (UTC) Since this is linked from DYK, does this fall under WP:CSK criterion 6? If so, can this be speedy kept? I am bad at usernames (talk...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. AfD is not the place to propose mergers; see WP:PAM for that. (non-admin...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #4 applies as this was created by a block evading sockpuppet. There is no...

Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep WP:CSK #3. No policy-based reason for deletion, and AfD is not cleanup. Clearly...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Closing per WP:CSK #4, any editor in good standing can renominate if required. (non-admin closure)...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1 – withdrawn by the nominator with no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep per CSK#1. Owen× ☎ 11:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #1 Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:25, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Keep Not sure why...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

discussions. Shadow311 (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep WP:CSK #1. Nominator has not given any policy-based reasons for deletion. Deletion...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:31...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

Per IrishGuy, this iis a textbook example of speedy keep. Straight from WP:CSK: "nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Closing per WP:CSK #4, any editor in good standing can renominate if required. (non-admin closure)...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per (at least) WP:CSK #4. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:46, 17 October 2021...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Nomination withdrawn by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Dps04 (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#2, as the nomination was made purely to complain about the subject. All other...

— Updatepedia (talk) 12:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1: the nominator has only proposed to merge the article. BilletsMauves€500...

the talk page of the nominator after they blanked this page, I think WP:CSK criteria 2 is relevant. CT55555 (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Comment...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Closing per WP:CSK #4, any editor in good standing can renominate if required. (non-admin closure)...

was speedy keep. Nominator withdrawal, no deletion contributions (per WP:CSK). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 02:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:34...

links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.cricketworldcuplivescores.com/2019/03/csk-vs-rcb-live-score.html (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed all 2 additions....

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK#3. (non-admin closure) I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 04:04, 2 May...

the page in question, and nobody has suggested a deletion rationale, WP:CSK#1.) --ais523 12:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Talk:Interstate 885 (NC) (edit | subject...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#1, absence of a deletion rationale as nominator has withdrawn their rationale...

May 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep (as creator) - the nomination falls under WP:CSK #1 with no policy based rationale given. The entire article is sourced, and...

03:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Speedy Keep currently linked on the main page (WP:CSK #6) Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 03:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per criteria #4 of WP:CSK; AfD was initiated by a sock. (non-admin closure) --Prothe1st (leave me a...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy Keep per WP:CSK criterion #2. Bad-faith nomination by permanently blocked, self-described...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy Keep per WP:CSK point 1 and WP:EARLY; nominator believes best process forward is to WP:CLEANUP...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. CSK no. 1 (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:39, 4 July...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4. The nominator was blocked at the time they made the nomination. Sir Sputnik...

1996 is not that far in the past, buddy. Also, speedy per what item of WP:CSK? Best, Walwal20 talk ▾ contribs 15:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC) Guy's name...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #1 (non-admin closure) Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 04:01...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. This meets WP:CSK #3 and #4 as a completely erroneous nomination created by a block-evading...

rational. —Farix (t | c) 11:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#2. This nomination is unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #4 applies as this was created by a block evading sockpuppet and there is...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator per WP:CSK#1, I will plan to improve the article to include more data and place it in...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1, as no deletion rationale has been provided and none has been brought forth...

to Wikipedia, Wizardics; however, I have to vote speedy keep here per WP:CSK 1 & 3, since you have not provided a valid reason for deletion. Please thoroughly...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎ per WP:CSK#4. ✗plicit 11:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Nomination withdrawn by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Dps04 (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎ per WP:CSK #1 (non-admin closure) AviationFreak💬 17:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [Hide this...

(UTC) Actually, it would be more accurate for me to !vote Speedy Keep per WP:CSK: the nomination rationale is that secondary sources are needed for a BLP...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #4 applies as this was created by a block evading sockpuppet. There is no...

be deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 21:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3, as No accurate deletion rationale has been provided. It is self-evidently...

thing goes with WP:CSK, not SNOW.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 16:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC) WP:SNOW is an essay. WP:CSK is a guideline. But...

(UTC) Since another editor has suggested delete, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Delete bold claims like "one...

been presented. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep: WP:CSK#1 applies as no deletion rationale has been presented. Let'srun (talk) 21:11...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#3 as an erroneous nomination. The project not being finished yet is not a...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎. Per WP:CSK #1, absence of delete rationale. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:00, 22...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Nomination withdrawn by the nominator. (non-admin closure) Dps04 (talk)...

this page. The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure per WP:CSK and WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 07:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Nouvelle Fédération-Board...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

(UTC) Speedy keep. The nomination is so deficient as to be eligible for WP:CSK #1. Moreover, Netherzone's great work indicates that the subject of this...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎. WP:CSK #1 (non-admin closure) Jfire (talk) 22:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [Hide this...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep: WP:CSK#3. Those three articles are obviously about different topics. Li Keqiang...

(UTC) Since Bearian has also suggested deletion, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. This can be closed per WP:CSK #4 as all non-banned editors have opined to keep. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1–2 (non-admin closure) Mephistophelian (contact) 00:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)...

creation/deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep: per WP:CSK#3. Encourage the nominee to read WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Let'srun (talk) 02:06...

No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep‎ per WP:CSK#1, withdrawn. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

WP:NOTDICT. —Tamfang (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2025 (UTC) Speedy Keep: Per WP:CSK#3, no accurate deletion rationale has been expressed. Let'srun (talk) 12:00...

19:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per StAnselm; borderline speedy per WP:CSK #3. I have a bit of trouble believing that WP:BEFORE was done, since a seconds-long...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1, nomination withdrawn and no other deletion opinions present. (Merge is...

nomination (but another editor added a substantive comment so this is not WP:CSK#4). In the end, no editors in good standing have advanced an argument for...

(talk • contributions) 16:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3. With all due respect I don't see how you can read the references and...

23:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Would you please enlighten me on which of the WP:CSK it meets? I only nominated ot because the article made no assertion of notability...

nominator may consider withdrawing and speedy keeping this discussion per WP:CSK#1, as the subject article no longer exists. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of...

Google anyway. XOR'easter (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Speedy Keep WP:CSK#3 —siroχo 06:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1–2 (non-admin closure) Mephistophelian (contact) 00:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:29, 31 December 2025 (UTC) ●Speedy Keep per WP:CSK: ”Absence of a deletion rationale.”.--~2025-44054-98 (talk) 11:02, 31 December...

2026 (UTC) The nomination does not qualify for a speedy keep closure per WP:CSK. Please amend your !vote or risk having it discarded. Owen× ☎ 15:29, 19 June...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2023...

GuideguildATX (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Recommend speedy close per WP:CSK item 3, No accurate deletion or merge rationale has been provided. No criticism...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per criteria #4 of WP:CSK; AfD was initiated by a sock. (non-admin closure) --Prothe1st (leave me a...

Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep WP:CSK #3. No policy-based reason for deletion, and AfD is not cleanup. Clearly...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy keep per CSK#4 (non-admin closure) UpTheOctave! • 8va? 18:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC) [Hide...

* Pppery * it has begun... 16:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3. WP:ONEOTHER refers to one other topic, not one other article. This is...

nominator's comment applied to the article in its current state would be CSK no. 3. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:17, 11 October...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep‎. WP:CSK, unclear rationale for deletion. Goldsztajn (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2025 (UTC)...

nominator may consider withdrawing and speedy keeping this discussion per WP:CSK#1, as the subject article no longer exists. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: nom is a blocked sockpuppet. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk)...

chance in hell of passing, and could just as well be also speedily kept by WP:CSK no. 3 (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:42, 24 June...

16:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep Absence of delete rationale WP:CSK CT55555(talk) 05:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC) Keep: Clearly passes WP:GNG and...

Kingdom. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:34, 10 May 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep - CSK 3. The nomination is erroneous. We don’t delete existing content and all...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep‎ per WP:CSK #1. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

else the AfD should be closed due to poor reasoning. See #1 and #3 at WP:CSK. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC) The problem...

Could you please provide one, else this nomination should be closed under WP:CSK#1. This appears to be a reasonably sourced article on a company, the machine...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Speedy Keep. Per WP:CSK #1, when nominator "fails to advance an argument for deletion". Nor is there...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep‎. Per WP:CSK#3, no valid rationale for deletion has been presented, if nothing else. Eddie891...

Jumpytoo Talk 20:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep per above and WP:CSK #1. The nominator is not making a case for the article's deletion, but effectively...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per criteria #4 of WP:CSK; AfD was initiated by a sock. (non-admin closure) --Prothe1st (leave me a...

(UTC) Comment, don't think it qualifies for a speedy keep per point 1 of WP:CSK. Hack (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC) Thanks Hack for the clarification...

Since other editors have suggested delete/redirect, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Redirect per nom and Bearian...

Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep WP:CSK #3. No policy-based reason for deletion, and AfD is not cleanup. Clearly...

deletion rationale. Toughpigs (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep: WP:CSK#1 applies here as there isn't any rationale for deletion. Let'srun (talk)...

"Speedy keep"? The two are very different. If Speedy keep, under which WP:CSK criterion? Owen× ☎ 11:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Keep Having "standard coverage"...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK, no one actually wants this deleted, and the idea of merging or redirecting...

about that country. Geschichte (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Which WP:CSK reason is being invoked here? –dlthewave ☎ 01:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC) #3...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #3: no accurate deletion rationale has been provided‎. (non-admin closure)...

draftspace has been presented, this is a speedy keep situation (item #3 of WP:CSK). Martinp (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Keep - as not a reason to delete...

after sources provided. Article cleanup encouraged. Non-admin closure per WP:CSK (and to mitigate backlog). Serpent's Choice 07:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎ per WP:CSK R1§3 (non-admin closure) AviationFreak💬 15:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [Hide...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1(3). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 19:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)...

need. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 02:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. I suggest merging lunar lander to this article, as lunar lander is a type...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per criteria #4 of WP:CSK; AfD was initiated by a sock. (non-admin closure) --Prothe1st (leave me a...

speedy keep per nominator withdrawal and no recommendations for delete (WP:CSK). While there is a suggestion of a move to List of mayors of Sandwich, that...

20:11:47 (UTC): w:ko:User:Trunaava (t - c; 22) to w:ko:첸나이 슈퍼 킹스 (diff  !top) - Link: cricbuzzipl.in/csk-team/ (R/Xmeta/L) Displayed all 2 additions....

rchives/Miscellaneous/2010 December 8 Buildings Why did O'Reilly buy out CSK? 67.188.104.24 (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC) I have an I6 Auto '89...

!vote. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. BilletsMauves€500 11:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...

--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep: Per WP:CSK, Absence of a deletion rationale. Nomination is a single, unnecessarily bitey...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep‎. per WP:CSK#1, nomination has been withdrawn Eddie891 Talk Work 14:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎ per WP:CSK (withdrawn nomination, no delete !votes). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn...

Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:25, 23 January 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. BilletsMauves€500 11:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC) This same article, with...

this page. The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn, satisfies WP:CSK. Regards, (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)...

2007 (UTC) Delete per Calton. "Speedy close" arguments are invalid per WP:CSK and WP:NOT a democracy. >Radiant< 15:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per...

JJK2000, as it is, this nomination is arguably eligible for speedy keep per WP:CSK#1 and even #3. You seem to know of WP:AFDHOWTO, but what about the preceding...

ITalk to my owner:Online 16:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. If you want to object to a proposed deletion, remove the tag from the...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was ‎ speedy keep WP:CSK #2c. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2026 (UTC) User:Triptych...

Kings–Sunrisers Hyderabad rivalry which is similarly sparse? That claims SRH are CSK's 3rd biggest rivals, which, if true, would make KXIP their 4th biggest! Spike...

to this page. The result was speedy keep‎. Nominator withdrawal, per WP:CSK. Goldsztajn (talk) 11:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK (withdrawn nomination). Satisfies WP:NPOL. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn...

The Transhumanist   07:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC) @The Transhumanist: Please read WP:CSK: no speedy keep criterion applies here. Other-stuff-has-not been-deleted...

includes controversies and owners [21:07] <Dipankan001> Did anyone notice the CSK GA? [21:07] <Vibhijain> so lets talk about statistics [21:08] <Tito_> Not...

made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. This can be closed per WP:CSK #4 as all non-banned editors have opined to keep. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk...

clear keep. Esolo5002 (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Keep: Borderline WP:CSK#3 as this is not a list article, tv guide, or database. Sources exist for...

made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. This can be closed per WP:CSK #4 as all non-banned editors have opined to keep. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎. CSK#1 - Absence of delete rationale. Neither the nominator, nor anyone else,...

notable and the nominatino presents no valid deletion rationale, so per WP:CSK#1 this should be closed. Katzrockso (talk) 11:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)...

no consensus. The nomination does not qualify for a "speedy keep" per WP:CSK, but some legitimate arguments have been brought up against deletion. Owen×...

(talk • contribs) 19:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Speedy Keep: per WP:CSK#1 or WP:CSK#3. No deletion rationale is being proposed here. User:Let'srun 19:29...

first !vote, this could have been procedurally closed as speedy keep under CSK#1 or #3. We don't nominate pages for keeping. Feel free to speedy renominate...

deleting it. 8ty3hree (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep per CSK 5. Linked to the main page. 8ty3hree (talk) 22:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)...

policy to find grounds for sending this to AfD. Speedy keep based upon WP:CSK 1, and 3. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:05, 17 September 2025 (UTC) I don't know how...

keep" votes, for which the nomination clearly does not qualify under WP:CSK, there is still consensus to keep the page. Owen× ☎ 13:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)...

edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep: Failure of WP:CSK; neither the nominator nor the editor they were starting the AfD on behalf...

been presented. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep: WP:CSK#1 applies as no deletion rationale has been presented. Let'srun (talk) 21:10...

GBooks search result suggests that this is a real thing. I don't think WP:CSK applies because the nomination suggests WP:OR concerns, which is a core policy...

made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. This can be closed per WP:CSK #4 as all non-banned editors have opined to keep. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk...

2026 (UTC) We are allowed to speedy keep, if we wish, in the case of WP:CSK #4, where the only contributor is a banned editor evading their ban. My only...

watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.cricketworldcuplivescores.com/2019/03/csk-vs-rcb-live-score.html (R/Xmeta/L) 2020-01-10 15:16:42 (UTC): User Fahim1739...

side had finished third at the league table with 16 points", or how about "CSK started their IPL 2011 campaign with a thrilling win against Kolkata Knight...

talk page concerns regarding recent nominations; this lead to point 2. of CSK, that the nomination is disruptive from an editor that lacks communication...

WP:CSK. If closed now, this would only end up on WP:DRV. ~ trialsanderrors 17:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Comment and Question: I read this on WP:CSK "nominations...

rationale. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3. If the nominator actually read the article instead of assuming everything...

The result was speedy keep. A little bit per WP:SNOW, but mostly per WP:CSK no. 3 - "The nomination is completely erroneous. No accurate deletion rationale...

this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎. Closing this on the basis of WP:CSK #3 - a call for deletion with no other explanation or a call for splitting...

reasons in the nomination apply anymore, should this be a speedy keep under WP:CSK reason 1? Ikjbagl (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG. The...

page, makes me wonder if the page is a candidate for speedy keep under WP:CSK point 3 "No accurate deletion rationale has been provided." CohenTheBohemian...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎. Per WP:CSK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete or redirect !votes. Thank...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. Per WP:CSK #3, the nomination was completely erroneous, appearing to be along the lines...

think it's a hoax. ~ A412 talk! 17:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:CSK #3. No arguments for deletion that are not clearly erroneous. ~ A412 talk...

Relisting comment: Notability is not an argument for speedy keep per WP:CSK. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:55, 29 June...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep‎ . Per WP:CSK#1, this nomination has been withdrawn and there are no outstanding !votes...

other keeps. --IHTS (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. There is a difference between a merge and a BLAR, and the nominator has...

nomination lacks a coherent deletion rationale, therefore qualifying per WP:CSK#1. Issues raised in the nomination are better addressed editorially on the...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: crichead.com/csk-team-2023-players-list/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2023-01-27 06:45:25 (UTC): User...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:CSK. The same proposal was made by the same nominator at CfD 2018 April 3, and...

Dysfunction (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Speedy Keep based upon WP:CSK #1 & #3. The nomination is not based upon any of the standard notability...

obvious keep.--JayHenry 08:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Okay, I just reread WP:CSK and in light of the fact that others agree it should be deleted I agree it...

RAJU(T) 07:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC) *Requesting speedy keep - Under WP:CSK 2.d - No deletion rationale is presented. This is not an AfD issue. -- Sirfurboy🏄...

keep: Nomination/BEFORE has various issues and entitled to speedy under WP:CSK 2. Allegations of deProdder ZengaONE as WP:SPA behind the back here and not...

I don't believe this qualifies for a "speedy keep" under any of the WP:CSK criteria. That said, after three weeks, we have no quorum for deletion, and...

2 May 2007 (UTC) 11:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy Keep: per clause 2 at WP:CSK. This is a bad faith nomination (a charge I do not make lightly) as a violation...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC) Keep or speedy keep per CSK#3: There is plenty of media coverage, with the best being an article from...

a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: WP:CSK#1 has been superseded because of a !vote for deletion since the last relist...

While it is only a single publication, it makes the nomination fail WP:CSK#3. Open to changing this if the nomination is revised to show exactly why...

that doesn't really factor in either way. I'm tempted to suggest that WP:CSK#3 applies. XOR'easter (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep -...

on the creator's talk page): SmokeyJoe is correct that the letter of WP:CSK #1 is met when merger is proposed, and (as this discussion shows) bringing...

no consensus. The nomination does not qualify for a "speedy keep" per WP:CSK, but some legitimate arguments have been brought up against deletion. Owen×...

February 2026 (UTC) The nomination does not qualify for speedy keep per WP:CSK. Owen× ☎ 23:33, 9 February 2026 (UTC) number 3 applies "The nomination is...

editing? If so, by retracting your nom we can speedy close this AfD using WP:CSK rationale #1. — Charles Stewart (talk) 23:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Procedural...

is very good. Chidgk1 (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep - WP:CSK criteria 1: absence of deletion rationale. The nom hasn't completed WP:BEFORE...

notability. Mccapra (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep: per WP:CSK#3. Nominator's "rationale" falls under WP:IDONTLIKEIT. This is a valid topic...

fairly obvious that this is a disruptive escalation of a content dispute. WP:CSK#2d applies. TompaDompa (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Keep - this is an...

Mumbai arun b_1992 (talk · contribs) - a huge fan of team India..also support CSK..love to watch gibbs, astle(different,no??!!) Arunprasad89 (talk · contribs)...

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3. I smell a hidden agenda. Anyone else? KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:43...

it up. MediaKyle (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep: Per WP:CSK #1. There may be content issues with the current version of the article,...

different. Calix2099 (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep: per WP:CSK#2. Nomination appears to be disruptive to express a personal disagreement...

that there are no independent sources is totally incorrect and fails WP:CSK#3. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC) This article has been unmaintained...

notability guidelines, and I think it should be considered Speedy Keep per WP:CSK#1. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 07:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC) Keep...

—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 05:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep: per WP:CSK #1. Nominator's argument is a textbook case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. The purpose...

Admin note: The nomination does not qualify for a "speedy keep" close per WP:CSK. Please amend your !vote, or risk having it discarded. Owen× ☎ 15:33, 19...

Admin note: the nomination is not eligible for a speedy keep closure per WP:CSK. Please amend your !vote or risk having it discarded. Owen× ☎ 13:01, 6 July...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: crichead.com/csk-team-2023-players-list/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2023-01-27 06:45:25 (UTC): User...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:CSK#3. The nomination rationale seems to be AI-generated and is entirely erroneous...

objections, I would advise that they withdraw this nomination so the admin can CSK this. Failing that, perhaps a snowball closure is in order.Tamsier (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK criterion #3 - no accurate deletion rationale has been provided. The LLM-generated...

page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC) File:Csk clt20.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs). Delete Uploader has a history...

requested it be kept. --Dennisthe2 08:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC) The WP:CSK criteria also requires that nobody other than the nominator recommends that...

Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1: I concur with David Eppstein. The premise of WP:BIODELETE requires a lack...

--Adamant1 (talk) 03:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC) @Adamant1: There's just WP:CSK#4, which does not apply if other editors have made substantive comments....

Template:Cripl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Cripl-CSK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Cripl-DC (talk ·...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#3. Nomination rationale was solely unfounded aspersions that the redirect...

suggestion that the article be speedily kept, on what basis do you believe WP:CSK to have been met? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Relax...

discussions to result in redirects. Therefore I suggest SK this under WP:CSK. However, I want to emphasize that such retaliatory behavior is not acceptable...

procedural/speedy keep in that the nomination lacks grounds for deletion WP:CSK. NPOL is criteria for inclusion, not exclusion. Not satisfying NPOL does...

Coolabahapple (talk) 00:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3; if I understood well, the nominator proposed deletion more like a WP:TNT...

know about the highest total in IPL match by going to the stats page of CSK or any other team. Team records stay within the team. While this list is...

and I look forward to seeing the article's progression. However, per WP:CSK#1, we cannot completely close this discussion as a speedy keep before checking...

Company. p. 95. ISBN 978-0786432752. Speedy Keep per BD2412's thoughts above. CSK#3: The nomination is completely erroneous. No accurate deletion rationale...

--Moscow Connection (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #2c. This was kept a month ago, and no basis has been identified for revisiting...

history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Franchise cricket team data CSK (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Franchise cricket...

pass of the WP:GNG. FWIW, personally, I do not see speedy keep criteria WP:CSK being met here (in this case, the main ones being: there is a deletion rationale...

GuideguildATX (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2026 (UTC) Recommend speedy close per WP:CSK item 3, No accurate deletion or merge rationale has been provided. No criticism...

block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) DevenCSK (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...

(diff  !top) - Link: www.ipltickets.net/chennai-super-kings-team-players-list-csk-team-squad-ipl/ (R/Xmeta/L) 2018-04-03 10:09:24 (UTC): User...

a deletion review). The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#2: Nomination apparently made to attack a user over allegedly "useless" edits...

history of Goguryeo. -- Visviva 01:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Revised per WP:CSK#Applicability. Clearly the nominator is not the only proponent of deletion...

October 2012 (UTC) Comment: This should have been closed as speedy keep per WP:CSK#5. However, the link is now off the main page so the point is now moot. Still...

2010-03-07 16:14:54 (UTC): User 91.150.97.235 (talk - contribs; 16) to FK ČSK Pivara (diff - undo) - Link: www.srpskistadioni.in.rs/eng/fc_cskpivara.html...

18:37, 30 March 2026 (UTC) NALBUM is not a speedy-keep criterion per WP:CSK. Do you have other criteria to disqualify the nomination? Owen× ☎ 14:44,...

protection can be lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC) Page: CSK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#2 C: Same page nominated, same (lack of) arguments, previous RfD on this...

English. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep per CSK #3. Each entry is a valid redirect from a foreign-language term, which necessitates...

to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. WP:CSK#1 and WP:CSK#3: No (accurate) reason was provided to delete this userspace redirect...

LSG, SRH, RR) and 1 player retirement / release of another 1 franchise (CSK) have already taken place. There was also news of another 2 support staff...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#3: No accurate deletion rationale has been provided. (non-admin closure)...

02:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK. The deletion rationale is completely erroneous (CSK#3) and the discussion is at the wrong deletion...

(CSK) was involved in Talk:RRR (film)#Regarding RRR Title expansion and the controversy surrounding it discussion where all the editors, except CSK, agreed...

CRS CRT CRU CRV CRW CRX CRY CRZ CSA CSB CSC CSD CSE CSF CSG CSH CSI CSJ CSK CSL CSM CSN CSO CSP CSQ CSR CSS CST CSU CSV CSW CSX CSY CSZ CTA CTB CTC CTD...

deletion and have less notability and citations: MagnaFlow_Performance_Exhaust, CSK_Auto, Pep_Boys, JC_Whitney, Western_Auto. VIP_Parts,_Tires_and_Service, Carquest...

(gene)|CRP', 'CRX' : 'CRX (gene)|CRX', 'CS' : 'CS (gene)|CS', 'CSK' : 'CSK (gene)|CSK', 'CST3' : 'CST3 (gene)|CST3', 'CST6' : 'CST6 (gene)|CST6', 'CST7'...

speedy keep. The nominator retracted their nomination rationale, thus WP:CSK#1: absence of deletion rationale. Only vote here is a keep. (non-admin closure)...

with the description page. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC) File:Csk logo.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs). School logo likely not owned by...

rationale has been presented yet, so this can legitimate be closed under WP:CSK#1 absent any !delete or !redirect rationales (which is currently the case)...

that the nomination does not qualify for a speedy keep closure under WP:CSK. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:36, 21 March...

2007 (UTC) Comment This nomination doesn't fit any of the criteria in WP:CSK. Deranged bulbasaur 11:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Keep When I saw this, my first...

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: atrendhub.com/sports/mi-csk-ipl-final-twitter-reaction/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2019-05-29 09:49:26 (UTC):...

—👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 19:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC) Strong keep or speedy keep per CSK#3 as the nomination statement is completely erroneous. Cannot find any evidence...

Jolielover, the organisation clearly meets WP:GNG. I say speedy keep per WP:CSK criterium 3 because while a rationale has been given, it bears no relation...

keep" votes. The nomination does not qualify for a speedy close under WP:CSK, as I commented after I reopened and relisted this discussion. I also discarded...

here. @Francis Schonken: I will not withdraw this nomination, and per WP:CSK it is no longer in my gift to do so. Please see what consensus emerges, and...

no sense, but it was found very quickly to not be nonsense. Thus, cue WP:CSK#3: No accurate deletion rationale has been provided. (non-admin closure)...

Report Checkpoint CNBC Great Stuff (CNBC) Open Exchange (CNBC) 4 Template:CSK ZSU Kyiv -> FC CSKA Kyiv records FC CSKA Kyiv season 2008-09 History of CSKA...

note that the nomination does not qualify for a speedy keep closure per WP:CSK. If you wish to argue for retention based on notability, rather than potentially...

a deletion review). The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK. Nominator proposes to withdraw, in favor of subsequent nomination below...

deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC) File:CSK Group.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs). corporate logo; no source; if...

interpretation of the fact that non-admins should defer to admins in closing AfDs. WP:CSK states "Although closing AfD discussions that end with an outcome of "keep"...

to understand that the clearly defined, very narrow criteria listed at WP:CSK apply to hardly any, if not none, of the AFDs where you !vote this way. Hijiri...

advice first. CMummert · talk 14:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Reverted. Per WP:CSK, a debate is not a speedy keep if people other than the nominator argue for...

2007 (UTC) Please see WP:CSK. >Radiant< 14:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC) I guess I should clarify, is there a way to apply WP:CSK without having to engage...

inappropriate for the following reasons: Their close rationale cited WP:CSK and they quoted #3: The nomination is completely erroneous. No accurate deletion...

official ISO-3166 country code  Czech Republic {{CZE}}  Czechoslovakia {{CSK}} or {{TCH}}  Denmark {{DNK}} or {{DEN}}  Djibouti {{DJI}}  Dominica {{DMA}}...

Abedin 19:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC) @Mehedi Abedin: Please note that, per WP:CSK#4, "if subsequent editors added substantive comments in good faith before...

(he) talk contribs subpages 06:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3. As stated in the lede, from 1898 to 1932 also called Porto Rico in English...

are more widely discussed as a rivalry than the currently existing CSK-MI and CSK-RCB rivalries are discussed in the media. I think you guys are just...

by many editors was CSK#2 (disruptive nomination) and I additionally supported the suggestion to close more along the lines of CSK#4 (block evasion by...

closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efik language as a speedy keep (WP:CSK #1, #2.1, #2.2, and #2.4) and subsequently came under fire. Mephtalk 23:45...

arguments calling for "speedy keep" (apparently the !voters are unversed in WP:CSK policy), none of which have addressed the policy concern of WINAD. The Evil...

February 2022 (UTC) Template:2018 IPL-CSK-Batting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:2018 IPL-CSK-Bowling (talk · history · transclusions ·...

If you wanted more input, ask a WikiProject or WP:FTN. Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. Katzrockso (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2026 (UTC) That is exactly within the scope...

Keep per DreamGuy. Smmurphy(Talk) 03:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Please read WP:CSK before the next time you feel like commenting in an AFD. Otto4711 04:13,...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #2. Nom's only edits are creating AfDs for this and Fredrik Svensk. AleatoryPonderings...

fits one of the already defined categories of "speedy delete." There is no CSK, just CSD. Festina lente, as the man said. Speedy keep, of all things, should...

The next day BrownHairedGirl closed the discussion as "speedy keep per WP:CSK. The same proposal was made by the same nominator at CfD 2018 April 3, and...

in August he promised he would not do it again. I also suspect that File:Csk clt20.jpg is a stolen image as well. I'm quite concerned about a number of...

16 April 2021 (UTC) Confirmed continued socking, most recently with Dhoni.csk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log ·...

nominator is temporarily inactive. You can read the speedy close criteria at WP:CSK, but in short, they are 1) The nomination is withdrawn or the nomination...

(talk) 13:48, 24 April 2026 (UTC) This situation seems pretty close to WP:CSK #3 - no deletion rationale has been offered other than WP:NEWLLM, which no...

sections, Template:CSKA Moscow sections, Template:Partizan sections, Template:CSK ZSU sections... who built based on that logic). The follow of note of commons...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was: speedy close per WP:CSK as nomination by banned editor. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:33...

closers should be reminded that there are few exceptions to that principle (WP:CSK, WP:SNOW and occasionally cautiously WP:IAR) Davey2010's incivilty, which...

Ish (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Can we close these discussions? WP:CSK clearly states that we can close these kinds of nominations early. Scorpions13256...

relisting a discussion started by yourself is a non-no, other than when WP:CSK applies. WP:INVOLVED apples applies to any editor performing admin functions...

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: atrendhub.com/sports/mi-csk-ipl-final-twitter-reaction/ (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2019-05-29 09:49:26 (UTC):...

(UTC) What Wikipedia:Speedy keep rationale are you referring to? See WP:CSK (Criteria for Speedy Keep). Axolitl (talk | contribs) 23:11, 1 August 2026...

crs crt cru crv crw crx cry crz csa csb csc csd cse csf csg csh csi csj csk csl csm csn cso csp csq csr css cst csu csv csw csx csy csz cta ctb ctc ctd...

be made to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. WP:CSK#4: Nominated by a blocked or banned user in violation of their block or ban...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#1: withdrawn by nominator; nobody else has commented. (non-admin closure)...

(which I believe to be erroneous), I am recommending a Speedy Keep, per WP:CSK points 1 & 3. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 00:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

8 October 2023 (UTC) Speedy Keep per Espresso Addict's thoughts above. CSK#3: The nomination is completely erroneous. No accurate deletion rationale...

Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3, as well put by User:Spiderone. Notable referee. gidonb (talk) 23:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3 - could User:Clasher7...

January 2007 (UTC) Note that such "procedural" arguments are invalid, per WP:CSK, WP:CREEP and WP:NOT a bureaucracy. >Radiant< 10:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)...

(UTC) Thanks for the ping. The AfD can no longer be speedy closed per WP:CSK#1, since there is now at least one participant arguing for deletion other...

billion people. I voted keep but this is more of a case of Speedy keep per WP:CSK as notability is already established two months back with a consensus to...

Mumbai arun b_1992 (talk · contribs) - a huge fan of team India..also support CSK..love to watch gibbs, astle(different,no??!!) Arunprasad89 (talk · contribs)...

we should be using IOC codes but the more generic ones. So I think TCH -> CSK Is it necessary ? Because IOC codes are the ones used nearly everywhere on...

article history Is this really not bordering 2nd point in WP:Speedy keep → WP:CSK 2. The nomination .. made for .. disruption ? Nom raising 'content dispute'...

in here), but more skills at content should be shown. We are working on CSK in June and I hope that you'll help us to get it to GA (this is an good opportunity...

page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. The nominator was evading a block (WP:CSK#4), see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oficialtowhid. (non-admin closure)...

Kotor; Serbia — VK Bečej, VK Crvena zvezda, VK Partizan; Soviet Union — CSK VMF Moscow, MGU Moscow; Spain — CN Atlètic-Barceloneta, CN Barcelona, CN...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep as per WP:CSK #4. Delete votes were discounted as per zzuuzz’s comment. (non-admin closure)...

fairly obvious that this is a disruptive escalation of a content dispute. WP:CSK#2d applies. TompaDompa (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Keep - this is an...

(UTC) Redirect to FK ČSK Čelarevo possible search term.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC) Redirect to FK ČSK Čelarevo - not likely...

referenced often. For comparison, WP:DSTOPICS got 13 views in the same period, WP:CSK only 10. Thryduulf (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Don't retarget and leave...

nomination (but another editor added a substantive comment so this is not WP:CSK#4). In the end, no editors in good standing have advanced an argument for...

Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:47, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep WP:CSK #3. No policy-based reason for deletion, and AfD is not cleanup. Clearly...

that !vote to "Speedy Keep" should be ignored by the closer, because WP:CSK clearly does not apply. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:42, 30 April...

WP:CSK is met, say for example, the amount of keep !votes are overwhelming within a very short span, then it can be closed as Speedy Keep, see WP:CSK once...

02:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Additionally, this isn't a speedy keep. Per WP:CSK, it only qualifies as speedy keep if: "The nomination was unquestionably...

thing goes with WP:CSK, not SNOW.  --Bowser the Storm Tracker  Chat Me Up 16:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC) WP:SNOW is an essay. WP:CSK is a guideline. But...

founder of CSK died, is that why? Or did O'Reilly just want a corporate takeover? Or what? According to this, O'Reilly bought them in 2008 and CSK's founder...

obvious keep.--JayHenry 08:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Okay, I just reread WP:CSK and in light of the fact that others agree it should be deleted I agree it...

than once.🆔 APO Discuss✍ 05:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK # 2–3. No valid reason for deletion has been given. @AppoWeb: Please stop...

com/vismath4/kaplan/node2.html http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/projects/starpatterns http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/washington/taprats http://www.topics.org.uk/5patterns_taprats...

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a sockpuppet, and closed per WP:CSK. – bradv🍁 23:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Tang Sauce (edit | talk | history | protect |...

alone). ~2026-30415-19 (talk) 07:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#2. Topic is objectively notable, and this is clearly a WP:POINTy, disruptive...

Speedy Keep. No valid reason has been put forward for deletion and, per WP:CSK#1b, this should be speedily closed. The venue to discuss using this image...

(gene)|CRP', 'CRX' : 'CRX (gene)|CRX', 'CS' : 'CS (gene)|CS', 'CSK' : 'CSK (gene)|CSK', 'CST3' : 'CST3 (gene)|CST3', 'CST6' : 'CST6 (gene)|CST6', 'CST7'...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy Keep per 'WP:CSK#5.(non-admin closure)  Ryan Vesey 03:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Operation...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK #1 - no rationale given for deletion nomination (non-admin closure) ‡ El...

Please do not modify it. Target of redirect: CSK Auto Reason: alternate names Source (if applicable): "CSK Auto Corporation to Acquire Grand Auto Supply...

(UTC) Speedy Keep due to absence of deletion rationale, as per C1 of WP:CSK CT55555 (talk) 00:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Delete WP:SOAP, blatant pre-release...

this section. The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator (WP:CSK). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC) Propose...

CS-4 C-Scheme CSCI C/SCSC CSCW CSG CSG-tree csh C shell .cshrc CSID C++SIM CSK Software CSL CSLIP CSM CSMA/CD CSMP CSNET CSO CSP CSP/80 CS/PCode CSP/k CS-Prolog...

for deletion has been provided, I am recommending a Speedy Keep, per WP:CSK point 1. -- Fhsig13 (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Delete - the original...

this page. The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure per WP:CSK and WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 07:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Nouvelle Fédération-Board...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#1, the nominator only suggested a merge (rather than deletion or redirection)...

12:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Comment: Strong keep, possibly speedy per WP:CSK#3: This nomination simply has nothing to do with page deletion policy at...

Keep per DreamGuy. Smmurphy(Talk) 03:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Please read WP:CSK before the next time you feel like commenting in an AFD. Otto4711 04:13,...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK, no one actually wants this deleted, and the idea of merging or redirecting...

nominator is temporarily inactive. You can read the speedy close criteria at WP:CSK, but in short, they are 1) The nomination is withdrawn or the nomination...

controversial person. As such, I suggest this AfD fits criterion 2 of WP:CSK for a Speedy Keep. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 21:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)...

as long as it is based on policies, but it is not binding. And btw, WP:CSK certainly doesn't apply. ~— Preceding unsigned comment added by Trialsanderrors...

Template:COL Template:COLON Template:COM Template:CPV Template:CRI Template:CSK Template:CUB Template:CURRENTDATE Template:CURRENTMINUTE Template:CUW Template:CYM...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK no. 1: Nomination withdrawn and no opposing !votes (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian...

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Canadian School of Kuwait (CSK) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions] reasoning -Vanessa1000...

after sources provided. Article cleanup encouraged. Non-admin closure per WP:CSK (and to mitigate backlog). Serpent's Choice 07:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)...

history of Goguryeo. -- Visviva 01:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Revised per WP:CSK#Applicability. Clearly the nominator is not the only proponent of deletion...

the talk page of the nominator after they blanked this page, I think WP:CSK criteria 2 is relevant. CT55555 (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Comment...

arguments calling for "speedy keep" (apparently the !voters are unversed in WP:CSK policy), none of which have addressed the policy concern of WINAD. The Evil...

2 May 2007 (UTC) 11:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy Keep: per clause 2 at WP:CSK. This is a bad faith nomination (a charge I do not make lightly) as a violation...

2007 (UTC) Comment This nomination doesn't fit any of the criteria in WP:CSK. Deranged bulbasaur 11:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Keep When I saw this, my first...

Coolabahapple (talk) 00:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3; if I understood well, the nominator proposed deletion more like a WP:TNT...

sufficient wp:sigcov.Dtt1 (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC) after reading WP:CSK suggested by @Doomsdayer520: I made it Keep from Speedy Keep. Dtt1Talk 08:47...

(talk • contributions) 16:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3. With all due respect I don't see how you can read the references and...

--Adamant1 (talk) 03:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC) @Adamant1: There's just WP:CSK#4, which does not apply if other editors have made substantive comments....

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4; the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a previously blocked...

improvement. Obvious COI from creator User:Writercsk (subject is "known as CSK" per the article). I wasn't able to locate any significant coverage of him...

to some users. For example the existence of WP:SK does not mean that WP:CSK and WP:KEEP fail their purpose. Thryduulf (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)...

19:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per StAnselm; borderline speedy per WP:CSK #3. I have a bit of trouble believing that WP:BEFORE was done, since a seconds-long...

Per IrishGuy, this iis a textbook example of speedy keep. Straight from WP:CSK: "nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1, which applies when the nominator "fails to advance any argument for deletion...

name. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Canadian School of Kuwait (CSK) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. As according to WP:CSK, point 1, a rationale has to be offered at AfD otherwise it may be speedily...

be deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 21:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3, as No accurate deletion rationale has been provided. It is self-evidently...

Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Keep or Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1b. There is no new deletion rationale presented in this nomination compared...

02:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Additionally, this isn't a speedy keep. Per WP:CSK, it only qualifies as speedy keep if: "The nomination was unquestionably...

there. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:CSK#1. No rationale is given for deletion. If the nominator believes that the...

Jumpytoo Talk 20:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep per above and WP:CSK #1. The nominator is not making a case for the article's deletion, but effectively...

12:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Comment: Strong keep, possibly speedy per WP:CSK#3: This nomination simply has nothing to do with page deletion policy at...

are more widely discussed as a rivalry than the currently existing CSK-MI and CSK-RCB rivalries are discussed in the media. I think you guys are just...

closure) as withdrawn by nominator with no other support for deletion WP:CSK#1 Pi (Talk to me!) 03:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Owen Holland (academic) (edit |...

Alpha 771 22:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Please familiarize yourself with WP:CSK. Also note that the previous nom was in September, not November, and that...

23:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Would you please enlighten me on which of the WP:CSK it meets? I only nominated ot because the article made no assertion of notability...

GBooks search result suggests that this is a real thing. I don't think WP:CSK applies because the nomination suggests WP:OR concerns, which is a core policy...

Since other editors have suggested delete/redirect, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Redirect per nom and Bearian...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: the nominator is a sock of a blocked user and no one else has commented...

nomination.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep: per WP:CSK#3. Clearly meets WP:BAND#C2 three times. Toddst1 (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2020...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4: the nominator is a blocked sockpuppet and all other !votes are to keep...

(UTC) Since another editor has suggested delete, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Delete bold claims like "one...

(UTC) Amkgp, you may close this discussion yourself as Speedy Keep per WP:CSK #1 :) --Dps04 (talk) Dps04 (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:34...

else the AfD should be closed due to poor reasoning. See #1 and #3 at WP:CSK. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC) The problem...

reasons in the nomination apply anymore, should this be a speedy keep under WP:CSK reason 1? Ikjbagl (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG. The...

2,800 6582 Template:AstDys 2,800 6583 Template:C-cmn 2,800 6584 Template:CSK 2,800 6585 Template:Calendar/styles.css 2,800 6586 Template:Certification...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. Just merge it. – Joe (talk) 07:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC) Ki the Earth...

1996 is not that far in the past, buddy. Also, speedy per what item of WP:CSK? Best, Walwal20 talk ▾ contribs 15:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC) Guy's name...

nominator's comment applied to the article in its current state would be CSK no. 3. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:17, 11 October...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#4. ✗plicit 23:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK #3. I smell a hidden agenda. Anyone else? KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:43...

erroneous one provided by the nominator, I am recommending a Speedy Keep, per WP:CSK Applicability point 3 (erroneous nomination rationale). -- Fhsig13 (talk)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. per WP:CSK#1, the nomination has been withdrawn. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:12, 28 January...

rationale. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#3. If the nominator actually read the article instead of assuming everything...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was procedural close per WP:CSK, nominated by a sockpuppet of a blocked user. ✗plicit 03:21, 12 May 2021...

Frost (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Keep, possibly speedy keep per WP:CSK #3 unless someone explains what's wrong with the seemingly independent, in-depth...

(UTC) Actually, it would be more accurate for me to !vote Speedy Keep per WP:CSK: the nomination rationale is that secondary sources are needed for a BLP...

WP:CSK#6, since it's linked from the main page. TompaDompa (talk) 18:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC) Well according to the strict definition of WP:CSK#6, it...

process. I'm not sure you can even do that via MfD. This might fall under WP:CSK #5, not sure. Also, the purpose of this page is not the a "drama board",...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#4. ✗plicit 14:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Ekkaphong Jongkesakorn (edit | talk |...

RAJU(T) 07:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC) *Requesting speedy keep - Under WP:CSK 2.d - No deletion rationale is presented. This is not an AfD issue. -- Sirfurboy🏄...

1937) 1901–02 Southampton F.C. season Leonardo Mancuso Simone Pontiggia ČSK Uherský Brod 1994–95 Czech 2. Liga Martin Svědík Tomáš Kaplan Brice Ntambwe...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:CSK no. 3; clearly the nominator has not looked, as suggested, at the French...

Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:CSK#1. No valid rationale for deletion is presented-- afd is not cleanup, if...

doesn't apply now because multiple people have voted delete in good faith WP:CSK - hako9 (talk) 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NACTOR. Geschichte...

the AfD as 'speedy keep'. The process is standard and is explained in WP:CSK and WP:WITHDRAWN. Nsk92 (talk) 15:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Done! Thanks...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. CSK#1, nominator fails to advance any argument for deletion. (non-admin closure)...

substantive comments about the article were made, so this falls under WP:CSK#4. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 00:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Angels Arc...

page, and no other editors have recommended deletion or redirection (WP:CSK#1). (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 05:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC) Glance (company)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #4. The nominator was blocked at the time they made the nomination. Sir Sputnik...

lider.sfu-kras.ru/info.php?id=3. * Links added in this diff: my.sfu-kras.ru/csk (48, 7, 7, 1) www.lider.sfu-kras.ru/info.php?id=3 (48, 2, 2, 1) 2009-03-26...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:CSK#1, absence of a deletion rationale as nominator has withdrawn their rationale...

deletion and have less notability and citations: MagnaFlow_Performance_Exhaust, CSK_Auto, Pep_Boys, JC_Whitney, Western_Auto. VIP_Parts,_Tires_and_Service, Carquest...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK#3 as an erroneous nomination. The project not being finished yet is not a...