This page is provided as an example template, from which other requests can be made. Please do not edit it.

De-adminship of Example

Archives

Archive 1

This page is for the nomination, poll, and closure only. Further discussion is on the talk page.

Note: This page is for the nomination only. All discussion related to this nomination should be in the talk page, commencing after the nomination stage has been certified.

The Arbitration Committee has passed a motion [link] to refer the de-adminship of Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) to the editor community.

Signed: Clerk or Arbitrator signature

We, the undersigned, propose the de-adminship of Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) to the editor community. By signing below, each nominator declares that they have read the policy, and that they meet the requirements of an eligible nominator.

Nominators must give reasons for nominating in the top section on the talk page. The signatures and comments will be certified after 7 days.

Signed

1. Editor #1 signature
2. Editor #2 signature
3. Editor #3 signature
4. Editor #4 signature
5. Editor #5 signature
6. Editor #6 signature
7. Editor #7 signature
8. Editor #8 signature
9. Editor #9 signature
10. Editor #10 signature

Evidence of requisite notices being made

• User talk:Example: [diff link]
• Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous): [diff link]
• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: [diff link]
• Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard: [diff link]

Evidence in support of the nomination

• Required: [diff link]
• Additional: [diff link(s)]

The nomination has not been certified. Discussion is not yet open.

The account Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) should have the sysop flag removed.

1. Nomination 1 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
2. Nomination 2 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
3. Nomination 3 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
4. Nomination 4 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
5. Nomination 5 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
6. Nomination 6 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
7. Nomination 7 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
8. Nomination 8 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
9. Nomination 9 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
10. Nomination 10 (must also sign nomination, above, and provide detailed evidence at talk), signed.
11. Support (only after nominations are complete) Example is a bad admin. Mrs. Example (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose. User:Example has some great contributions. They should remain an admin. Don't Desysop (talk)

1. Neutral Comment, signed.

This section is for the closure only. All discussion should be on the talk page.