ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

any person with a corresponding title and name. Shortcuts MOS:DABRLMOS:DABRL MOS:DABREDMOS:DABRED A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should...

2014 (UTC) Keep See MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Clearly not true that none are notable - one has article, others meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. It is...

-Drdisque (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Keep – The consensus at MOS:DABRL is that red links, if linked at other pages as they are for the politician...

article is created. [roux � x] 10:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per MOS:DABRL that red link shouldn't even be in the DAB page, which leaves a disambiguation...

orphaned except for this disambiguation page and therefore violates MOS:DABRL, but that's a minor issue.Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)...

2013 (UTC) Speedy keep Phantom Creeps does meet MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL about the stuntman, and there are 3 valid entries (one just added) plus...

Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Keep All meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION, and are helpful to the reader. The page contains bluelinks...

acceptable as it is a redlink (MOS:DABRL). Bbb23 (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Keep The redlink certainly meets MOS:DABRL guidelines. However, per WP:TWODABS...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

2010 (UTC) I count five blue links, one in each description. See also MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC) keep as...

2014 (UTC) Speedy keep User:Ubiquity should read MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. 6 valid entries and valid see also. Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)...

User:Boleyn3 in that attempt is: "Dab page with no entries which meet MOS:DABRL" Propaniac (talk) 15:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Delete As noted above, User:Boleyn3...

(talk) 19:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Found 2 more entries which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION, and there's actually a few more. Boleyn (talk) 19:15,...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

experienced dab editor who knows better. Station1 knows this complies with MOS:DABRL and every other aspect of wp:MOSDAB policy! Station1 and i have worked together...

MOS:DABRL alreadys takes care of this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Delete. Heh, I remember created the MOS:DABRL shortcut...

off here) 14:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Keep 2 valid entries, both meeting MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION; and 2 valid see alsos. I could have understood a merge...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

(talk) 00:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Keep several entries, all meeting MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)...

topics. If there is only one article, it isn't all that ambiguous. MOS:DABRL suggests that one blue link with all red links isn't desired. -- Mufka (u)...

unneeded disambiguation page that doesn't lead anywhere. According to MOS:DABRL, "a disambiguation shouldn't be made up completely of red links, because...

the entries satisfy the guideline on red links on disambiguation pages WP:DABRL - they all have at least one link from an article that mentions them (WP:DABMENTION)...

Tavix |  Talk  19:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC) Keep Four valid entries (per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION, two very valid see alsos, easily misspelt as Sharon...

July 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete neither entry have an article or meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

speedy category G8? Chris (talk) 17:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC) By applying WP:DABRL and removing the redlinks, we would be left with an article that meets WP:CSD#A1...

September 2014 (UTC) Keep. All of the entries satisfy WP:DABMENTION and WP:DABRL. older ≠ wiser 19:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Actually, this AfD turns out...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

should have been deleted per mos:dabrl, which I have now done. The 2nd entry does meet MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL, it just needed the blue link changed...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

Keep now meets requirements, with 2 articles and others which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Keep: now a valid...

topic with the same article Ante Pavelić (1869–1938), regardless of MOS:DABRL. It won't be more complex to depict multiple topics from the same article...

This page disambiguates three topics, but two of them are red links. MOS:DABRL says A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included...

clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per MOS:DABRL. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

contained no blue-links and only redlinks. I got rid of these according to WP:DABRL and this discussion yesterday so that the page could then be speedied, which...

Robeson Home. ℳøℕø 04:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Keep both entries do meet MOS:DABRL, although neither seem particularly notable. Boleyn2 (talk) 09:03, 25 April...

to be valid, it needs a 'Stephen Kirk' who has an article, who meets MOS:DABRL, or meets MOS:DABMENTION. This page has several, plus in the 'see also'...

16 December 2019 (UTC) Redirect' per above. 2nd entry doesn't meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC) Delete. Bois...

nightclubs with the same name. Since the nightclubs is not notable, per MOS:DABRL it shouldn't be included as there isn't a chance of there being an article...

Bassist, and Bass Player (magazine). The third is a redlink, which per MOS:DABRL is acceptable since it has incoming links from multiple other articles requesting...

(which has been cleaned up by User:PamD and perhaps others). Please see MOS:DABRL which, if I recall correctly, provides the clarification that a redlink...

incoming links to its red links, but the other two did, meeting both MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. I also found another entry which meets both, so this...

guidelines to be a valid dab entry, you need to meet MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL. Both the musician and the footballer meet these guidelines. There is also...

2014 (UTC) Eihter way, it's three valid entries, as the redlink meets MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Keep, seems...

CiphriusKane (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC) See MOS:DABENTRY, MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION...dabs are indexes of where someone/something has an article...

Smartyllama (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Delete last 2 don't meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC) The above...

redlink meets MOS:DABRL, so three valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 13:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Sorry, but I have had a look at MOS:DABRL and it's not clear...

Whpq (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Keep User:Kudpung, please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

station is created. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep. WP:DABRL in its current form is one of the most brain-dead guidelines Wikipedia has...

20:26, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Keep Joeykai, please see MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. 4 valid entries, plus 2 valid see alsos. Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 11 April...

confusion. As for the other entries, I deleted one which didn't meet MOS:DABRL so there is only a see also to a similar name; if they genuinely could be...

listing them? Timmyshin (talk) 19:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. If, after reading them, you believe that the skier and...

current conditions) 17:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Keep both entries meet MOS:DABRL and so are valid. This dab helps people find pages which mention these women...

October 2012 (UTC) Keep 3 valid entries, all with article or meeting MOS:DABRL. Clearly meets guidelines. If you disagree with the guidelines, that's a...

that are contained in our articles. This has 3 valid entries - see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION, GeoffreyT2000, and please consider withdrawing nomination...

February 2015 (UTC) *Keep Gidonb, the htree redlinks now clearly meet MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION (that wasn't clear for them before you nominated this)...

JHunterJ (talk) 00:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC) The exact MOS page is at MOS:DABRL, actually.  :) But my question was about PatGallacher's reasoning.—S Marshall...

October 2015 (UTC) Comment I looked for other Peter Stranges who meet MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION or have articles and added 2 more entries. There are others...

15:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep All entries have articles or meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 17:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

expected to lead." mikeman67 (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Keep per MOS:DABRL#Red_links. I ran the what links here test on the three red links; two of...

link doesn't mention being known as 'Dumbo'; all others don't meet MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Delete Redirect-at first I thought...

encyclopedia. PamD 09:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) I fixed the red links per MOS:DABRL and a critical typo, so it seems legit, there's WP:POTENTIAL. The separate...

don't need articles to be a valid entry, just to meet MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Reywas92Talk 19:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC) No it won't. Red links must satisfy WP:DABRL to be included on disambiguaton pages. For set indices, a reference is sufficient...

April 2018 (UTC) Keep Several valid entries, with articles or meeting MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. If someone types 'Roger Mitchell' into Wikipedia, they...

(talk) 19:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC) Keep both entries are valid, per MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 06:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Keep I just used this dab page...

23:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep User:The Banner, have you read MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION? Valid dab page, 2 valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 16:13...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails MOS:DABENTRY and MOS:DABRL. Has only two entries, one of which is a redlink. Bbb23 (talk) 22:03, 20...

- Eldereft (cont.) 21:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete per MOS:DABRL as it states that an article with only one blue link is unnecessary because...

guidelines for disambiguation pages, had you seen MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL? The journalist's entry jst needed tidying. I created the article, it only...

en wiki on disambiguation pages. Redlinks are fine, but need to meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION, and this didn't. Therefore, the blue link could have...

please do so and add them to the dab. But as it stands, neither meet MOS:DABRL and so can't really be taken into account. As it's a navigational tool rather...

08:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Keep I found more entries which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. There are also several partial matches which are ambiguous...

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. User:Emeraude, when you've looked other the relevant...

(entries don't need to have extant articles to be valid dab entries - see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION.) What could possibly be gained by deleting this page...

is no existing article with the title, the list entries all satisfy WP:DABRL and there is a blue link for each entry that provides a reader with information...

entries looked for before nomination? This has 3 valid entries (one per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION) and a valid see also. If there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC...

contains the Macumber source and information from it). This complies with MOS:DABRL. The disambiguation page is not to include any sources or photos. It will...

2023 (UTC) Keep several valid entries, all meeting MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL. If someone is looking for a Larry Greene, this will be WP:USEFUL. Boleyn...

[TALK][CONTRIBS] 02:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - this falls clearly under MOS:DABRL "A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included...

have their own articles, with two entries meeting MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL . Boleyn (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

17:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Keep all meet criteria at MOS:DABMENTION, MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABENTRY. Boleyn (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Comment MOS:DABMENTION...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per MOS:DABRL and because there is only one link this actually points to. The See also...

Treasure Island#Minor characters), per JHunterJ and FunnyPika. Also per MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION. -- Trevj (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC) The above...

to see if there were any other valid entry, meeting MOS:DABMENTION, MOS:DABRL or with an article, that just hadn't been added to the dab as yet. I added...

indeed, to be notable) to be a valid entry, se MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC) For an overall page with a bunch...

with several entries, either with articles or meeting MOS:DABMENTION/MOS:DABRL. Your suggestion to merge its contents belongs on the talk page. Boleyn...

existing set of guidelines - Wikipedia:Red link is also a guideline (as is MOS:DABRL). --Joy (talk) 08:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC) Leaning keep per Joy. There are...

deemed wikipedia-notable. Note red-link NRHP entries are permitted by MOS:DABRL and should be retained, but red-link entries should be edited to include...

at WP:RfD as it's unnecessary. PamD 16:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC) Keep. MOS:DABRL also applies. This is probably a WP:SPEEDYKEEP against criterion 1 given...

12:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Comment It doesn't meet dab guidelines - MOS:DABRL, which is the threshold for disambiguation pages. If you think he's notable...

move album to base name. Only one entry which has an article, or meets MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION; now the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC after the AfD deletion...

2024 (UTC) Most if not all of the entries fail both WP:DABMENTION and WP:DABRL and would be removed if merged. As such, merging is functionally equivalent...

disambiguation is to refer users to other Wikipedia pages." See also MOS:DABRL. I have deleted these in the past under G6. That does not mean necessarily...

couldn't be redlinked because they don't meet MOS:DABRL and the politician doesn't meet MOS:DABRL either. None of the others are valid entries, although...

org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Jerzy_Miller_(poet) which is empty, so the MOS:DABRL standard isn't met. However, pl:Jerzy Miller indicates more possibly notable...

logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Disambiguation page, delete per MOS:DABRL second paragraph. Guy0307 (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Keep That is a...

let's note for the record that none of these three entries here satisfy WP:DABRL because no other article in the English Wikipedia mentions these people...

move Lingdian (band) to the primary page. As first entry doesn't meet MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION or have an article, this would meet the criteria for speedy...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The first and third entries should be deleted per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. The creator asserts that there is some controversy over...

absolutely do need dabs when they don't have an article, that is what MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION cover. Readers are looking for information on a 'Gilbert...

while others are not. Also, the disambiguation fails for the most part MOS:DABRL as a disambiguation should point to other articles, not a random assortment...

that a properly supporting bluelink must be included in the entry, per MOS:DABRL. How frequently do you add or reformat hatnotes to articles? Are hatnotes...

(talk) 13:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Keep certainly the first 3 entries meet MOS:DABRL, although the later ones appear to be partial matches. Boleyn2 (talk) 14:18...

notability requirements. It's not clear what to do from WP:DAB and MOS:DABRL. Perhaps {{Otheruses4}} or {{For}} in the lead section of person2, with...

a {{redirect}} hatnote could be added to the author's article. The MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION sections cover those types of entries. -- JHunterJ (talk)...

Dabs are indexes - the people on them need to meet MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL - they do NOT need to meet notability. If someone types in Ryan Stephenson...

12:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Comment It doesn't meet dab guidelines - MOS:DABRL, which is the threshold for disambiguation pages. If you think he's notable...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete neither entry meets mos:dabrl, so it is a dab with no valid links Boleyn3 (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2010...

used by specialists tests and so are suitable dab entries. One other MOS:DABRL topic which shows up prominently in search results is the Thina River, a...

articles), it needs an article of its own, or mention in an article (see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION). Only one entry here is currently valid. As for what...

(UTC) Redlinks are allowed (not encouraged) on disambiguation pages. See WP:DABRL. Basically, the redlink needs to be in use in articles other than the disambiguation...

need a few minutes to clean it up to meet MOSDAB guidelines fully, MOS:DABRL in particular. Question: did i see indication that there was a previous...

notability or even mentioned in the articles per se so it clearly violates MOS:DABRL Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Delete:...

looking for entries not on there, but which do have an article, or meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. Pinging Pppery, Shhhnotsoloud, Mathglot and NmWTfs85lXusaybq...

the console, The Family Game, The Family Game (game show), and maybe WP:DABRLs like "Family-friendly board game, a category of board games". 59.149.124...

no incoming links So these entries on any such DAB page would fail MOS:DABRL, and removing them would leave nothing to disambiguate, i.e. the one-entry...

dab pages have NRHP redlink entries, some not fully compliant with MOS:DABRL policy, which really bothers some editors. This drive will fix those and...

Autofix 1 O More than one red link on a line MOS:DABRL 1,003 0.37% No 2 N Red link with no blue link MOS:DABRL 29,058 10.78% No 3 M Multiple blues link on...

redlink being created in context in some article per requirement of wp:DABRL. Fight churn, which turns off prospective and experienced editors. Fight...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

confusion. I also note that the other patriarch's entry currently fails WP:DABRL, so it shouldn't even be listed there (but I'll leave it for now). -- Tavix...

structure. There is a standard for keeping redlinks on DAB pages, at MOS:DABRL, which basically requires a supporting bluelink to document that the topic...

Ears) 06:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC) The redlink is fine on the dab page (see WP:DABRL). Please take a deep breath, assume some good faith that experienced editors...

mainly useful when the "correct" target article doesn't exist yet. Since MOS:DABRL is fervently adhered to, a template like this one is the obvious interim...

with edit summary: Instead of leaving rude edit summaries, please read MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. This was Joe's response, undoing all my edits with the...

an article that shows the same redlink in context. More specifics at MOS:DABRL. From time to time it seems surprising to an editor, but it is further acceptable...

at the wrong person. HupHollandHup (talk) 16:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC) MOS:DABRL refers to what to do about redlinks on disambiguation pages, not hatnotes...

complete understanding of WP:MOSDAB and is making up own conditions for MOS:DABRL and even after being asked for clarification defending this own creations...

that they don't come up as redlinks on disambiguation pages", which per WP:DABRL is unnecessary. I think that that discussion may have found a resolution...

14:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC) Keep given that the entries which meet WP:DABRL should not have been removed from the disambiguation page so I restored...

with edit summary: Instead of leaving rude edit summaries, please read MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. This was Joe's response, undoing all my edits with the...

I did here to John Breen. These were reverted and I was pointed to MOS:DABRL#Red_links. Which after reading is totally understandable but it still doesn't...

those two links is not a partial, and the other was perfectly fine per WP:DABRL. What you thought a partial is simply a transliteration of the district's...

a bluelink or as a redlink with a supporting bluelink as required by wp:DABRL) and at other list-articles such as a list of rectories or Elks buildings...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Mos:dabrlMos:dabrl → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages  ([[Talk:Mos:dabrl|talk]] · links · history ·...

guidelines to be a valid dab entry, you need to meet MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL. Both the musician and the footballer meet these guidelines. There is also...

people? Robert McClenon (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC) I believe so. WP:DABRL covers the subject, but the same page also says "A disambiguation page should...

WP:PRIMARYRED (The existing article is not automatically the primary topic). The WP:DABRL-compliant entry for the news site on such a dab page would be something...

2010 (UTC) I count five blue links, one in each description. See also MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC) keep as...

idea. Agathoclea (talk) 15:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC) You are right, per MOS:DABRL, redlinks are allowed. Allowing references would be useful to verify the...

by the same name can be compiled as a disambiguation page (unless the WP:DABRL guideline is in the way, but that's a whole other can of worms). A set index...

Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Dab page equivalent MOS:DABRL discourages entries where the blue link does not mention the term. Whatever...

enough to have an article? Roger (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC) See MOS:DABRL.--ukexpat (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2012 (UTC) I and another contributor created...

little eh. --NE2 11:43, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Redlinks may be fine, see MOS:DABRL. — Kusma talk 11:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Redlinks are fine if they'd...

2014 (UTC) Keep See MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Clearly not true that none are notable - one has article, others meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. It is...

Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Keep All meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION, and are helpful to the reader. The page contains bluelinks...

off here) 14:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Keep 2 valid entries, both meeting MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION; and 2 valid see alsos. I could have understood a merge...

contained no blue-links and only redlinks. I got rid of these according to WP:DABRL and this discussion yesterday so that the page could then be speedied, which...

red link is used in other articles and an article is possible. See MOS:DABRL. Fences&Windows 21:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC) And I wrote a stub at Tom Rapoport...

(UTC) A red main link is not a valid reason to delete a dab entry (see MOS:DABRL). Granted, the bluelinked article that went with it didn't refer to "chimera"...

Disambiguation pages can/do include redlinked entries. Those should comply with MOS:DABRL, i.e. be supported by a bluelink to an article that shows the redlink in...

MOS:DABRL, on the page and ready to be added. Now has two blue links plus valid see also. First entry should be deleted as doesn't meet MOS:DABRL and...

(which has been cleaned up by User:PamD and perhaps others). Please see MOS:DABRL which, if I recall correctly, provides the clarification that a redlink...

for him to be linked and have it at the DAB page in compliance with WP:DABRL. I put born XXXX as I couldn't find a WP:RS for his birth year, so a different...

ongoing maintenance of the dab pages to update (for example, to follow MOS:DABRL it is proper to include an explanatory phrase such as "listed on the NRHP...

current conditions) 17:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC) Keep both entries meet MOS:DABRL and so are valid. This dab helps people find pages which mention these women...

contains the Macumber source and information from it). This complies with MOS:DABRL. The disambiguation page is not to include any sources or photos. It will...

topics. If there is only one article, it isn't all that ambiguous. MOS:DABRL suggests that one blue link with all red links isn't desired. -- Mufka (u)...

shouldn't include entries not mentioned in other Wikipedia articles (see MOS:DABRL), which is the main difference between List of lakes named Fish Lake and...

interesting interpretation of MOS:DABRL. No need for this page. Eusebeus (talk) 20:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Keep According to MOS:DABRL: A link to a non-existent...

article is created. [roux � x] 10:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per MOS:DABRL that red link shouldn't even be in the DAB page, which leaves a disambiguation...

there is a valid wikipedia article topic of that name (spelled out at MOS:DABRL). The redlink in the dab is valid only if there is a supportable mainspace...

Cemetery, not Home of Peace) should not have all those redlinks, per MOS:DABRL, because they do not disambiguate anything on WP and therefore lead nowhere...

User:Boleyn3 in that attempt is: "Dab page with no entries which meet MOS:DABRL" Propaniac (talk) 15:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Delete As noted above, User:Boleyn3...

17:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Keep all meet criteria at MOS:DABMENTION, MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABENTRY. Boleyn (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Comment MOS:DABMENTION...

are discouraged on disambiguation pages, with a few exceptions. See MOS:DABRL. older ≠ wiser 18:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC) But your example didn't include...

should have been deleted per mos:dabrl, which I have now done. The 2nd entry does meet MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL, it just needed the blue link changed...

how is a reader supposed to find out if this isn't just a hoax? Also MOS:DABRL says redlinks should only be used, if an article links to it. In this case...

experienced dab editor who knows better. Station1 knows this complies with MOS:DABRL and every other aspect of wp:MOSDAB policy! Station1 and i have worked together...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete neither entry meets mos:dabrl, so it is a dab with no valid links Boleyn3 (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2010...

need a few minutes to clean it up to meet MOSDAB guidelines fully, MOS:DABRL in particular. Question: did i see indication that there was a previous...

Reywas92Talk 19:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC) No it won't. Red links must satisfy WP:DABRL to be included on disambiguaton pages. For set indices, a reference is sufficient...

- Eldereft (cont.) 21:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Strong Delete per MOS:DABRL as it states that an article with only one blue link is unnecessary because...

clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per MOS:DABRL. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

2013 (UTC) Speedy keep Phantom Creeps does meet MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL about the stuntman, and there are 3 valid entries (one just added) plus...

article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC) See MOS:DABRL. We shouldn't do that unless another article already links to Aaron Goldstein...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The first and third entries should be deleted per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. The creator asserts that there is some controversy over...

bring up from time to time is that for technical compliance with the MOS:DABRL component of MOSDAB, the supporting bluelink, which currently pipelinks...

(talk) 19:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Found 2 more entries which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION, and there's actually a few more. Boleyn (talk) 19:15,...

logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD) Disambiguation page, delete per MOS:DABRL second paragraph. Guy0307 (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Keep That is a...

indeed, to be notable) to be a valid entry, se MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC) For an overall page with a bunch...

September 2014 (UTC) Keep. All of the entries satisfy WP:DABMENTION and WP:DABRL. older ≠ wiser 19:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Actually, this AfD turns out...

16 December 2019 (UTC) Redirect' per above. 2nd entry doesn't meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC) Delete. Bois...

February 2015 (UTC) *Keep Gidonb, the htree redlinks now clearly meet MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION (that wasn't clear for them before you nominated this)...

redlink meets MOS:DABRL, so three valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 13:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Sorry, but I have had a look at MOS:DABRL and it's not clear...

Keep now meets requirements, with 2 articles and others which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Keep: now a valid...

CiphriusKane (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC) See MOS:DABENTRY, MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION...dabs are indexes of where someone/something has an article...

there is a valid wikipedia article topic of that name (spelled out at MOS:DABRL). The redlink in the dab is valid only if there is a supportable mainspace...

please do so and add them to the dab. But as it stands, neither meet MOS:DABRL and so can't really be taken into account. As it's a navigational tool rather...

confusion. As for the other entries, I deleted one which didn't meet MOS:DABRL so there is only a see also to a similar name; if they genuinely could be...

while others are not. Also, the disambiguation fails for the most part MOS:DABRL as a disambiguation should point to other articles, not a random assortment...

2014 (UTC) Speedy keep User:Ubiquity should read MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. 6 valid entries and valid see also. Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)...

unneeded disambiguation page that doesn't lead anywhere. According to MOS:DABRL, "a disambiguation shouldn't be made up completely of red links, because...

20:26, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Keep Joeykai, please see MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. 4 valid entries, plus 2 valid see alsos. Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 11 April...

July 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete neither entry have an article or meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom...

redlinks, as long as they are supported by an appropriate bluelink, per MOS:DABRL. However the disambiguation page at "Signal Mountain" does not serve the...

(talk) 00:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Keep several entries, all meeting MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)...

with several entries, either with articles or meeting MOS:DABMENTION/MOS:DABRL. Your suggestion to merge its contents belongs on the talk page. Boleyn...

entries looked for before nomination? This has 3 valid entries (one per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION) and a valid see also. If there is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC...

Treasure Island#Minor characters), per JHunterJ and FunnyPika. Also per MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION. -- Trevj (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC) The above...

Smartyllama (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Delete last 2 don't meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC) The above...

Disambiguation pages can/do include redlinked entries. Those should comply with MOS:DABRL, i.e. be supported by a bluelink to an article that shows the redlink in...

guidelines, a few redlinks could be added, as long as they comply with MOS:DABRL, i.e. as long as the item is purported to be worthy of an article, somewhere...

at WP:RfD as it's unnecessary. PamD 16:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC) Keep. MOS:DABRL also applies. This is probably a WP:SPEEDYKEEP against criterion 1 given...

to see if there were any other valid entry, meeting MOS:DABMENTION, MOS:DABRL or with an article, that just hadn't been added to the dab as yet. I added...

Dabs are indexes - the people on them need to meet MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL - they do NOT need to meet notability. If someone types in Ryan Stephenson...

(talk) 13:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Keep certainly the first 3 entries meet MOS:DABRL, although the later ones appear to be partial matches. Boleyn2 (talk) 14:18...

October 2015 (UTC) Comment I looked for other Peter Stranges who meet MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION or have articles and added 2 more entries. There are others...

incoming links to its red links, but the other two did, meeting both MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. I also found another entry which meets both, so this...

that are contained in our articles. This has 3 valid entries - see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION, GeoffreyT2000, and please consider withdrawing nomination...

en wiki on disambiguation pages. Redlinks are fine, but need to meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION, and this didn't. Therefore, the blue link could have...

Tavix |  Talk  19:08, 24 April 2012 (UTC) Keep Four valid entries (per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION, two very valid see alsos, easily misspelt as Sharon...

October 2012 (UTC) Keep 3 valid entries, all with article or meeting MOS:DABRL. Clearly meets guidelines. If you disagree with the guidelines, that's a...

nightclubs with the same name. Since the nightclubs is not notable, per MOS:DABRL it shouldn't be included as there isn't a chance of there being an article...

a {{redirect}} hatnote could be added to the author's article. The MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION sections cover those types of entries. -- JHunterJ (talk)...

redlinks, as long as they are supported by an appropriate bluelink, per MOS:DABRL. However the disambiguation page at "Signal Mountain" does not serve the...

Clarityfiend (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep Please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. User:Emeraude, when you've looked other the relevant...

Mos:DAB, Mos:DP, Mos:Dab, Mos:Dp, Mos:TM, Mos:bio, Mos:co, Mos:dab, Mos:dabrl, Mos:date, Mos:dates, Mos:dp, Mos:head, Mos:layout, Mos:lds, Mos:names,...

15:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep All entries have articles or meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 17:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

JHunterJ (talk) 00:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC) The exact MOS page is at MOS:DABRL, actually.  :) But my question was about PatGallacher's reasoning.—S Marshall...

guidelines for disambiguation pages, had you seen MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL? The journalist's entry jst needed tidying. I created the article, it only...

don't need articles to be a valid entry, just to meet MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

guidelines, a few redlinks could be added, as long as they comply with MOS:DABRL, i.e. as long as the item is purported to be worthy of an article, somewhere...

This page disambiguates three topics, but two of them are red links. MOS:DABRL says A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) MOS:DABRL says that there should be some scope of creation of the red links in a disambiguation...

acceptable as it is a redlink (MOS:DABRL). Bbb23 (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Keep The redlink certainly meets MOS:DABRL guidelines. However, per WP:TWODABS...

[TALK][CONTRIBS] 02:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Delete - this falls clearly under MOS:DABRL "A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included...

(entries don't need to have extant articles to be valid dab entries - see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION.) What could possibly be gained by deleting this page...

move album to base name. Only one entry which has an article, or meets MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION; now the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC after the AfD deletion...

listing them? Timmyshin (talk) 19:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. If, after reading them, you believe that the skier and...

April 2018 (UTC) Keep Several valid entries, with articles or meeting MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. If someone types 'Roger Mitchell' into Wikipedia, they...

redlink being created in context in some article per requirement of wp:DABRL. Fight churn, which turns off prospective and experienced editors. Fight...

expected to lead." mikeman67 (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Keep per MOS:DABRL#Red_links. I ran the what links here test on the three red links; two of...

link doesn't mention being known as 'Dumbo'; all others don't meet MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Delete Redirect-at first I thought...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails MOS:DABENTRY and MOS:DABRL. Has only two entries, one of which is a redlink. Bbb23 (talk) 22:03, 20...

articles), it needs an article of its own, or mention in an article (see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION). Only one entry here is currently valid. As for what...

station is created. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep. WP:DABRL in its current form is one of the most brain-dead guidelines Wikipedia has...

is no existing article with the title, the list entries all satisfy WP:DABRL and there is a blue link for each entry that provides a reader with information...

can always disambiguate these uses, although it'd consist entirely of WP:DABRLs. I'm fine with deletion as well. -- Tavix (talk) 02:23, 12 February 2016...

move Lingdian (band) to the primary page. As first entry doesn't meet MOS:DABRL, MOS:DABMENTION or have an article, this would meet the criteria for speedy...

2014 (UTC) Eihter way, it's three valid entries, as the redlink meets MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Keep, seems...

in disambiguation pages, although they are sometimes warranted. See MOS:DABRL. By the way, it would be great if you fixed your signature by going to Special:Preferences...

23:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep User:The Banner, have you read MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION? Valid dab page, 2 valid entries. Boleyn (talk) 16:13...

February 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation pages can also have red links per MOS:DABRL. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC) A "See also" list item...

examples violating DABRL can be found); if you are a particular stickler for rules, you might have unlinked them, thus satisfying DABRL, although I don't...

processes. Note disambig page red-link entries are permitted explicitly by MOS:DABRL and should be retained, but should be edited to include a supporting blue-link...

some would argue the links added were actually fine and belong (see MOS:DABRL). I'm not sure I agree with the idea we should have unlinked or red-linked...

that a properly supporting bluelink must be included in the entry, per MOS:DABRL. How frequently do you add or reformat hatnotes to articles? Are hatnotes...

am not sure. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC) WP:DABRL can support redlinked articles if there is a target bluelink article that...

November 2010 (UTC) I was cleaning redlinks from the disambig page CAF per MOS:DABRL: diff. I consider this a minor edit, although it changes the page content...

general, thus making this a good page to make a disambiguation page. WP:DABRL would cover using {{ill}} for the two historical figures. -- 65.92.246.77...

(zh:棠溪站) and Tangxi railway station (Jinhua) (zh:湯溪站), both of which meet WP:DABRL now (I added a mention of the former at Guangzhou Baiyun railway station...

entries are "further information pages", but they are valid entries per WP:DABRL and/or WP:DABMENTION. Furthermore, this was at AfD at the time of deletion...

XMASTREE 79 ABBR 79 COMP 72 TT 72 Date 71 Film 71 Headings 71 Imgloc 71 Dabrl 71 Dates 71 Overlink 71 Names 71 Bio 71 Poss 71 Head 71 Pn 71 Layout 71...

looking for entries not on there, but which do have an article, or meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION. Pinging Pppery, Shhhnotsoloud, Mathglot and NmWTfs85lXusaybq...

(links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages (exists?) No 402 MOS:DABRL (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages (exists?) No 403...

to be valid, it needs a 'Stephen Kirk' who has an article, who meets MOS:DABRL, or meets MOS:DABMENTION. This page has several, plus in the 'see also'...

DABACRO 213 DABINITIALS 213 DABINITS 213 DABNOENTRY 213 NICKS 213 SAWW 213 Dabrl 213 ALIAS 212 LEGALNAME 212 BOXING/WEIGHT 212 STAGENAME 212 COMMONNAMEBIO...

2024 (UTC) Most if not all of the entries fail both WP:DABMENTION and WP:DABRL and would be removed if merged. As such, merging is functionally equivalent...

link it from somewhere else to make sure we're not making it up, per WP:DABRL. --Joy (talk) 09:31, 21 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. There...

the entries satisfy the guideline on red links on disambiguation pages WP:DABRL - they all have at least one link from an article that mentions them (WP:DABMENTION)...

2023 (UTC) Keep several valid entries, all meeting MOS:DABMENTION or MOS:DABRL. If someone is looking for a Larry Greene, this will be WP:USEFUL. Boleyn...

encyclopedia. PamD 09:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) I fixed the red links per MOS:DABRL and a critical typo, so it seems legit, there's WP:POTENTIAL. The separate...

08:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Keep I found more entries which meet MOS:DABRL / MOS:DABMENTION. There are also several partial matches which are ambiguous...

notability or even mentioned in the articles per se so it clearly violates MOS:DABRL Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Delete:...

absolutely do need dabs when they don't have an article, that is what MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION cover. Readers are looking for information on a 'Gilbert...

org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Jerzy_Miller_(poet) which is empty, so the MOS:DABRL standard isn't met. However, pl:Jerzy Miller indicates more possibly notable...

let's note for the record that none of these three entries here satisfy WP:DABRL because no other article in the English Wikipedia mentions these people...

existing set of guidelines - Wikipedia:Red link is also a guideline (as is MOS:DABRL). --Joy (talk) 08:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC) Leaning keep per Joy. There are...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per MOS:DABRL and because there is only one link this actually points to. The See also...

have their own articles, with two entries meeting MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL . Boleyn (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

entries are "further information pages", but they are valid entries per WP:DABRL and/or WP:DABMENTION. Furthermore, this was at AfD at the time of deletion...