ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people can check that facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined...

292). ECREE is frequently invoked to discredit research dealing with scientific anomalies or any claim that falls outside the mainstream.[...] ECREE has...

User of Wikipedia guidelines. Per WP:Exceptional, WP: Extraordinary and WP:Ecree, his content would require multiple mainstream sources to offset the 5 that...

292). ECREE is frequently invoked to discredit research dealing with scientific anomalies or any claim that falls outside the mainstream.[...] ECREE has...

consensus. You’ve acknowledged that WP:ECREE applies but seem loath to apply the actual evidentiary standards of WP:ECREE: Claims contradicted by the prevailing...

well, in particular, Mary Murphy's views on gender/racial bias in applying ECREE (p. 272). Added. ~ HAL333 15:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Have you searched...

events points to the likelihood of hitting the bullseye something of an ECREE situation. I find your attempt to pooh-pooh skeptics a bit remarkable (Mark...

(talk) 17:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC) "A form of language" would still have WP:ECREE issues, though. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Not as an attributed...

not violate policies and it adds encyclopedia value. I also believe WP:ECREE applies. The Doreen Granpeesheh is currently barely more than a stub article...

links | watch | logs | views) Article uncritically parrots some pretty WP:ECREE claims about "base reality" to alien abductions. Pasulka is one of those...

Gadling (talk) 11:36, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Spencer's claims themselves are WP:ECREE-able, but the fact that he makes such claims and he has been given a platform...

job is to relay accepted knowledge as published in the best sources. WP:ECREE is a useful check in case of "surprising" claims. Bon courage (talk) 17:29...

single paper. This is an argument about WP:DUE rather than unreliability. ECREE issues fall under both V (and through it, RS and RSN) as well as NPOV (and...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) which skirts ever-so-close to the WP:ECREE border. I don't think it quite crosses over into problematic territory,...

contextualization and makes some pretty outlandish (in the sense of WP:ECREE claims! jps (talk) 23:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC) Yeah, what led me to tag it...

then I wouldn't find this a very confidence-inspiring source (see WP:ECREE). Ljleppan (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC) The book cites Wikipedia...

cult-like organisation. It should be one of the last sources used alone for WP:ECREE claims about events in Iran. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)...

someone's name is isn't "extraordinary" or "exceptional" information. WP:ECREE is for allegations about cold fusion or that Wonderpam is a cure for all...

it look a media is state media because MJRC said so You could claim WP:ECREE for the mass edits where MJRC is the only source. 173.206.110.217 (talk)...

one of reliability but always one of weight, dueness, onus and a hint of ECREE. There is no way Rodgers accounts for, or is owed by way of use by others...

statement of that beyond it being a nationalist fantasy runs up against WP:ECREE. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 22:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC) I wrote most of the article and I know...

viewpoint, is still couched. Any exceptional claims also remain covered by WP:ECREE. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC) I have reopened this discussion...

but his own say-so). Given that the entire subject is something of a WP:ECREE game, for obvious reasons, I would argue that Wikipedia has good cause to...

peer-reviewed the paper because of the field itself (e.g. homeopathy). WP:ECREE is also a factor in this; and the idea that dead people meditate is rather...

June 2024 (UTC) Or the WP:PROFRINGE-adjacent lack of understanding of WP:ECREE on topics like panspermia and Dark Matter (which, with credit to Drbogdan...

state the film grossed over ₹200 crore. They do not seem to understand WP:ECREE nor do they acknowledge alternative viewpoints. It seems that their intent...

demographics of a region requires Per WP:Exceptional, WP: Extraordinary and WP:Ecree. Which is why I then asked the user to provide more than one source to irrevocably...

never followed that bad faith mentality. In fact, I mostly based on the ECREE principle in the very few cases I used more dubious sourcing, i.e. only...

well, in particular, Mary Murphy's views on gender/racial bias in applying ECREE (p. 272). Added. ~ HAL333 15:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Have you searched...