ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

biophysical environment". Shortcuts MOS:FIRSTMOS:FIRST MOS:LEADSENTENCEMOS:LEADSENTENCE The first sentence should introduce the topic, and tell the nonspecialist...

introduce a list with "This is a list..." or "This list of Xs..."; check WP:LEADSENTENCE for more details. No need to bold image captions, check WP:CAPTION for...

page: I only looked at the first two sentences of the lead. Per MOS:LEADSENTENCE this does not "tell the nonspecialist reader what or who the subject...

article creators remains that a concise statement of notability (MOS:LEADSENTENCE) will save an article from PROD and AfD. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:27, 13...

good shape, Gog. I have a few comments: the lead needs work. Per MOS:LEADSENTENCE, the first sentence needs to properly introduce the article. Suggest...

consists of 20 skaters and 3 goaltenders. should be rephrased per MOS:LEADSENTENCE. Modified. Again, I followed the basic idea of the above-mentioned articles...

should all of this be bold? That's the storm's official name, so per WP:LEADSENTENCE I believe it's correct for the full title to be in bold. – Juliancolton | Talk...

consists of 20 skaters and 3 goaltenders. should be rephrased per MOS:LEADSENTENCE. Modified. Again, I followed the basic idea of the above-mentioned articles...

an article, it's improper to say "This article describes...", see WP:LEADSENTENCE. The lead should not speak about the article itself but should instead...

primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified. See WP:LEADSENTENCE for guidance that applies to other elements, such as reputable directors...

an article, it's improper to say "This article describes...", see WP:LEADSENTENCE. The lead should not speak about the article itself but should instead...

claim to significance should appear in the first sentence. (See MOS:LEADSENTENCE) Don't expect the NPP to read the entire article, or check the sources...

Definition and notability should be in the first sentence. As per WP:LEADSENTENCE, The article should begin with a short declarative sentence, answering...

followed? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC) WP:LEADSENTENCE says: "When the page title is used as the subject of the first sentence...

the bolded repetition of the article title, not a requirement of WP:LEADSENTENCE. On the article talk page, Tamfang suggested "The effects on human society...

Live" and then the second sentence would talk about his creation. WP:LEADSENTENCE is relevant here. There's room for a few more details in the lead. None...

is no mention of statement in lead sentence in source ref #3 (See MOS:LEADSENTENCE on how lead sentences should read). Ref #2 is WP:PRIMARY, so a better...

intended to supplement WP:MOSINTRO, but in practice they conflict with WP:LEADSENTENCE and possibly Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies. Contrast this with...

complete responsibility of the sock edits. His edit[61] clearly violated WP:LEADSENTENCE, which specifically states that the first sentence should generally match...

Wikipedia rule while making edits in Muse (disambiguation)? Read MOS:LEADSENTENCE If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first sentence...

Keep , it's used several times in the article (although not in theWP:LEADSENTENCE); that's easily fixed but to do so now might prejudice the outcome here)...

Whispered (talk) 23:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC) The applicable guideline is WP:LEADSENTENCE and it says nothing about a comma. You're correct, it's bad punctuation...

introduce a list with "This is a list..." or "This list of Xs..."; check WP:LEADSENTENCE for more details. You can just remove that and start with the second...

@Giants, I moved the wikilink. I believe the sentence now complies with WP:LEADSENTENCE. – Lionel (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC) Okay. In that case, can we...

the page title should be the subject of the first sentence." in WP:LEADSENTENCE than many other options. Marginally less concise than "Support for abortion...

problems I see with that is the sample first sentence. To perhaps follow WP:LEADSENTENCE more closely, it should more accurately define the subject, rather than...

However, I think the third example isn't really okay because the WP:LEADSENTENCE suggests, "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first...

(UTC) I don't think this use of quotes is correct, per MOS:TERM or MOS:LEADSENTENCE - can you confirm? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)...

first paragraph in the lead? It looks a bit awkard. It is required (MOS:LEADSENTENCE) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC) I wonder why the Awards...

nationality and anything else relevant that could be reliably sourced. Per WP:LEADSENTENCE, the article shouldn't be introduced as "This is a list of..." Watch...

in effect, summarise the entire article by defining its scope per WP:LEADSENTENCE. I've tried rewriting the first sentence, see what you think now. Prioryman...

mind, and that's how I interpret it. Secondly, your own words, the WP:LEADSENTENCE defines it as: "A female is a human with a gender identity that is the...

draft article is actually about. It might be helpful for you to read MOS:LEADSENTENCE. I also see lots of sentences that aren't supported with references,...

mind, and that's how I interpret it. Secondly, your own words, the WP:LEADSENTENCE defines it as: "A female is a human with a gender identity that is the...

(though the lead should summarize the article as a whole) - please see WP:LEADSENTENCE. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the comments...

differences. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Lead, and the sections MOS:LEADSENTENCE and MOS:LEADPARAGRAPH, as well as the rest of that recommendation. One...

article creators remains that a concise statement of notability (MOS:LEADSENTENCE) will save an article from PROD and AfD. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:27, 13...

"Raja Alan Singh Meena...", as that is the Wikipedia guideline per MOS:LEADSENTENCE. You mention that "Historian Colonel James Tod has written about Alan...

December 2018 (UTC) In this edit I think I correctly interpreted MOS:LEADSENTENCE. I don't think the statistics about the size of the market belong in...

lede still starts 'The informal term "Soviet Empire" is used by...' (WP:LEADSENTENCE recommends using the article title, with exceptions) not 'Soviet imperialism...

was. This is a hard article to write a first sentence for, but per WP:LEADSENTENCE the title doesn't have to appear verbatim, so I think we could go with...

2014 (UTC) Neat. Didn't know that about Zimmer. And good point about LEADSENTENCE. Something we can address on the talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please...

especially for in the lede. Consider splitting it after Gautama? As per WP:LEADSENTENCE, if someone is particularly famous for 1 particular reason, then it should...

emancipation of his slaves only after his death. This complies with the MOS:LEADSENTENCE and MOS:LEADPARAGRAPH guidelines by setting out the subject in a nutshell...

(talk) 12:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC) BTW, the same editor also violates MOS:LEADSENTENCE in this edit. Thylacoop5 (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC) more wasting...

body of the article. While not related to the TOC positioning issue, WP:LEADSENTENCE specifically reads "The first sentence should tell the nonspecialist...

instead. Tomiĉo (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC) No worries Tomiĉo. MOS:LEADSENTENCE suggests "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first...

January 2024 (UTC) If you don't care for MOS:NOFORCELINK, consider MOS:LEADSENTENCE, which is also part of the MoS and so policy. It starts "The first sentence...

@Giants, I moved the wikilink. I believe the sentence now complies with WP:LEADSENTENCE. – Lionel (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2012 (UTC) Okay. In that case, can we...

article (as the WP:LEAD only covers the most important points, and the WP:LEADSENTENCE even more so), and since the #Terminology section does cover the subtleties...

articles should start with a definition is possible according to MOS:LEADSENTENCE. It's true that the definition is not particularly helpful to readers...

introduce a list with "This is a list..." or "This list of Xs..."; check WP:LEADSENTENCE for more details. You can just remove that and start with the second...

in effect, summarise the entire article by defining its scope per WP:LEADSENTENCE. I've tried rewriting the first sentence, see what you think now. Prioryman...

the event.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 06:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC) MOS:LEADSENTENCE is obviously ignored (that a riot is named after St Scholastica Day occured...

without explanation in the first sentence defiitely conflicts with MOS:LEADSENTENCE. NadVolum (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC) The Convention on the...

(though the lead should summarize the article as a whole) - please see WP:LEADSENTENCE. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the comments...

should all of this be bold? That's the storm's official name, so per WP:LEADSENTENCE I believe it's correct for the full title to be in bold. – Juliancolton | Talk...

emancipation of his slaves only after his death. This complies with the MOS:LEADSENTENCE and MOS:LEADPARAGRAPH guidelines by setting out the subject in a nutshell...

good shape, Gog. I have a few comments: the lead needs work. Per MOS:LEADSENTENCE, the first sentence needs to properly introduce the article. Suggest...

especially for in the lede. Consider splitting it after Gautama? As per WP:LEADSENTENCE, if someone is particularly famous for 1 particular reason, then it should...

the bolded repetition of the article title, not a requirement of WP:LEADSENTENCE. On the article talk page, Tamfang suggested "The effects on human society...

was. This is a hard article to write a first sentence for, but per WP:LEADSENTENCE the title doesn't have to appear verbatim, so I think we could go with...

problems I see with that is the sample first sentence. To perhaps follow WP:LEADSENTENCE more closely, it should more accurately define the subject, rather than...

introduce a list with "This is a list..." or "This list of Xs..."; check WP:LEADSENTENCE for more details. No need to bold image captions, check WP:CAPTION for...

first paragraph in the lead? It looks a bit awkard. It is required (MOS:LEADSENTENCE) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC) I wonder why the Awards...

right that the article would be more engaging this way. However, MOS:LEADSENTENCE clearly states that articles should start with a definition. Following...

January 2024 (UTC) If you don't care for MOS:NOFORCELINK, consider MOS:LEADSENTENCE, which is also part of the MoS and so policy. It starts "The first sentence...

2025 (UTC) @Gecko G: I think(?) you've missed that MOS:FIRST and WP:LEADSENTENCE go to the same place. Ixtal used the latter shortcut in their close....

above that while the information belongs in the lead, the existing MOS:LEADSENTENCE is suboptimal. A rewrite to handle the views/activism on their own rights...

written from a neutral point of view pillar, neutrality policy, & the MOS:LEADSENTENCE & MOS:LEADCLUTTER guidelines. Peaceray (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2024...

180 JNR 180 NUMERAL 180 SNR 180 LONDONDERRY 180 REVEREND 179 RUBY 179 LEADSENTENCE 179 INSTITUTION 179 MILOPCAT 179 IMGREL 179 BOXING/RECORDNOT 179 MILSPECIFIC...

instead. Tomiĉo (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC) No worries Tomiĉo. MOS:LEADSENTENCE suggests "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first...

seems to force being overly superficial (not well in keeping with MOS:LEADSENTENCE). More importantly, "non-organic" is not even a univeral or well-defined...

claim to significance should appear in the first sentence. (See MOS:LEADSENTENCE) Don't expect the NPP to read the entire article, or check the sources...

standard as to when they should be applied, especially when used in the MOS:LEADSENTENCE or as categories. Why does "far-right" appear in the lead sentence of...

into a disagreement with another editor because of this; they cite MOS:LEADSENTENCE to say that all articles should have the exact article title in bold...

14 April 2026 (UTC) Dissoxciate, the title may be okay, but the WP:LEADSENTENCE and the whole focus of the article may not be. Generally speaking, Wikipedia...

wearing a hat. Simonm223 (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2025 (UTC) Maybe MOS:LEADSENTENCE? What I believe the main focus of this RfC is not whether or not he has...