ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Shortcuts WP:NLIWP:NLI WP:LOCALINTWP:LOCALINT WP:TOWNWP:TOWN A local interest is a subject that is likely only to be known by and only to be of interest...

Non-notable filmmaker Orange Mike | Talk 03:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC) from WP:LOCALINT : "Sources from local papers and other materials found within the city...

something at AfD when I clearly didn’t nominate for those reasons. Also WP:LOCALINT which claims local news is good enough by itself for notability is a failed...

other places, but the reference is from Connecticut which goes against WP:LOCALINT. ZabMilenko 06:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

same as a hometown newspaper. WP:LOCALINT addresses this, but as of right now it is just a proposal. Without WP:LOCALINT we have to base this on WP:POLITICIAN...

October 2022 (UTC) Delete - No references except for their own site. WP:LOCALINT, too. I tried to find independent media coverage, but found nothing aprop...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Delete. Seems to be WP:LOCALINT without any of the mainstream documentation that would push it up to meeting...

(talk) 04:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC). Delete. JPL sums this up well as WP:LOCALINT, plus most of the references are web pages. Agricola44 (talk) 20:43, 19...

count towards notability. WP:LOCAL is an essay which says "no", while WP:LOCALINT is a proposed guideline that says "yes", with the talk page discussion...

scores. I couldn't find any in-depth coverage of the topic, even in WP:LOCALINT sources. Therefore I can't find any of our criteria which indicates the...

(talk) 00:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep WP:LOCAL is an essay, WP:LOCALINT a failed proposal. The relevant rule is not one requiring non-local sources...

the interest is at state level, not just (e.g.) a metropolitan area. WP:LOCALINT therefore isn't a problem.Ross-c (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Relisted...

way over the notability hurdle of WP:GNG. Finally, please note that WP:LOCALINT remains a failed essay . -The Gnome (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)...

coverage. WaPo pieces are acceptable whether or not they're local: WP:LOCALINT was rejected. pburka (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Delete clearly...

(UTC) Weak delete. Having some issues finding notability outside of WP:LOCALINT, which is expected of a structure only important to the city of Quincy...

in part focusing on the question of "local" I want to point out that WP:LOCALINT failed, I think, because it was too restrictive. But even if one tries...

wants articles like this and finds them encyclopedic. For instance, WP:LOCALINT failed in part because it was too restrictive. Also, our longstanding policy...

North Carolina would arguably be regional, rather than local. (See also WP:LOCALINT, which argues that matters of merely local significance may still be notable...

alternate festival names, as I should have. I don't ascribe to the essay WP:LOCALINT, so my !vote is at the very least neutral, based on what Michael has turned...

this "regional notability" issue. There is a proposed guideline of WP:LOCALINT but it has not yet received consensus for adoption. Nolamgm (talk) 11:39...

sources must be outside the area they are covering. Are you referencing WP:LOCALINT? If so, that is a failed proposal, and WP:LOCAL is only an essay. As a...

many people are making the claim that there is only "local coverage", WP:LOCALINT defines an entry as a local interest only if 100% of its sources are "local"...

something at AfD when I clearly didn’t nominate for those reasons. Also WP:LOCALINT which claims local news is good enough by itself for notability is a failed...

North Carolina would arguably be regional, rather than local. (See also WP:LOCALINT, which argues that matters of merely local significance may still be notable...

same as a hometown newspaper. WP:LOCALINT addresses this, but as of right now it is just a proposal. Without WP:LOCALINT we have to base this on WP:POLITICIAN...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Delete. Seems to be WP:LOCALINT without any of the mainstream documentation that would push it up to meeting...

coverage. WaPo pieces are acceptable whether or not they're local: WP:LOCALINT was rejected. pburka (talk) 03:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Delete clearly...

(UTC) Weak delete. Having some issues finding notability outside of WP:LOCALINT, which is expected of a structure only important to the city of Quincy...

alternate festival names, as I should have. I don't ascribe to the essay WP:LOCALINT, so my !vote is at the very least neutral, based on what Michael has turned...

way over the notability hurdle of WP:GNG. Finally, please note that WP:LOCALINT remains a failed essay . -The Gnome (talk) 08:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)...

wants articles like this and finds them encyclopedic. For instance, WP:LOCALINT failed in part because it was too restrictive. Also, our longstanding policy...

other places, but the reference is from Connecticut which goes against WP:LOCALINT. ZabMilenko 06:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

in part focusing on the question of "local" I want to point out that WP:LOCALINT failed, I think, because it was too restrictive. But even if one tries...

the interest is at state level, not just (e.g.) a metropolitan area. WP:LOCALINT therefore isn't a problem.Ross-c (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC) Relisted...

this "regional notability" issue. There is a proposed guideline of WP:LOCALINT but it has not yet received consensus for adoption. Nolamgm (talk) 11:39...

October 2022 (UTC) Delete - No references except for their own site. WP:LOCALINT, too. I tried to find independent media coverage, but found nothing aprop...

sources must be outside the area they are covering. Are you referencing WP:LOCALINT? If so, that is a failed proposal, and WP:LOCAL is only an essay. As a...

scores. I couldn't find any in-depth coverage of the topic, even in WP:LOCALINT sources. Therefore I can't find any of our criteria which indicates the...

count towards notability. WP:LOCAL is an essay which says "no", while WP:LOCALINT is a proposed guideline that says "yes", with the talk page discussion...

many people are making the claim that there is only "local coverage", WP:LOCALINT defines an entry as a local interest only if 100% of its sources are "local"...

(talk) 04:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC). Delete. JPL sums this up well as WP:LOCALINT, plus most of the references are web pages. Agricola44 (talk) 20:43, 19...

(talk) 00:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep WP:LOCAL is an essay, WP:LOCALINT a failed proposal. The relevant rule is not one requiring non-local sources...