Search Results: Wikipedia:MINORASPECT
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Minggu, 2026-08-02 03:48:49All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Harrington
Minggu, 2025-12-14 05:14:55of superficial coverage of each scandal does not appear WP:DUE per WP:MINORASPECT, For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Arizona and Washington, D.C., hunger strike
Senin, 2025-04-07 00:32:06unless sources about the bills' history specifically mention this (per WP:MINORASPECT). Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 03:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast (2nd nomination)
Minggu, 2025-12-14 03:04:33"Wikipedia is not a newspaper and not a tabloid, particularly for a WP:MINORASPECT of a subject's career." Fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. GhostOfDanGurney...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plantagenet Alliance
Selasa, 2025-12-16 10:10:59attacking . . . WP:SUMMARYSTYLE" to argue that we shouldn't blow up a WP:MINORASPECT of a subject into a separate article bloated with excessively detail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene Byon
Minggu, 2025-12-14 01:54:30not constitute multiple works) but does seem to help show this is a WP:MINORASPECT of her BLP. Beccaynr (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC) These "regional"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 98
Rabu, 2022-11-02 23:46:35advocating the removal claimed their rationale on the grounds of WP:MINORASPECT, although there was long and implicit consensus to preserve the passage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Rushmore in popular culture
Selasa, 2025-12-16 09:07:30WP:OFFTOPIC/WP:COATRACK territory due to how much weight is given to WP:MINORASPECTS) content were removed, there would be very little quality content left...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1105
Sabtu, 2025-06-28 03:45:07was on a Portal/Current Events page, was aware of obscurities like WP:MINORASPECT by edit 16, was filing at WP:ANI by edit 44, and was filing ArbCom cases...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2021 December 7
Sabtu, 2021-12-11 13:00:54reliable sources, see policies like WP:Due weight, more specifically the WP:MINORASPECT section. When writing about living people you also need to be aware of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelli Stavast
Kamis, 2025-09-11 18:12:47Wikipedia is not a newspaper and not a tabloid, particularly for a WP:MINORASPECT of a subject's career. Based on my research, there also appears to be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 3
Jumat, 2022-01-14 07:58:25of superficial coverage of each scandal does not appear WP:DUE per WP:MINORASPECT, For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 18
Minggu, 2021-12-26 16:17:27not constitute multiple works) but does seem to help show this is a WP:MINORASPECT of her BLP. Beccaynr (talk) 12:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC) These "regional"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 2
Kamis, 2022-05-12 07:04:06attacking . . . WP:SUMMARYSTYLE" to argue that we shouldn't blow up a WP:MINORASPECT of a subject into a separate article bloated with excessively detail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 5
Minggu, 2022-05-15 21:04:01WP:OFFTOPIC/WP:COATRACK territory due to how much weight is given to WP:MINORASPECTS) content were removed, there would be very little quality content left...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 26
Sabtu, 2021-11-06 11:19:22"Wikipedia is not a newspaper and not a tabloid, particularly for a WP:MINORASPECT of a subject's career." Fails WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. GhostOfDanGurney...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 15
Rabu, 2021-10-27 02:18:23Wikipedia is not a newspaper and not a tabloid, particularly for a WP:MINORASPECT of a subject's career. Based on my research, there also appears to be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Seven (1995 film)/archive1
Minggu, 2024-03-10 07:05:44it then the same should go for this article (that would make it a WP:MINORASPECT). TompaDompa (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC) It should probably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mars in fiction/archive1
Senin, 2023-07-10 07:06:27WP:FACR 1c for reasons of overemphasizing what per the sources is a WP:MINORASPECT. TompaDompa (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Indeed, non-actionable, I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Zebelyan
Jumat, 2025-12-19 09:00:27Each item derived from routine media is (basically by definition) a WP:MINORASPECT and thus is not encyclopedic to include in the body of an article, which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/March 2024
Senin, 2024-04-01 03:57:47it then the same should go for this article (that would make it a WP:MINORASPECT). TompaDompa (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC) It should probably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 490
Sabtu, 2025-10-18 00:22:57(talk) 19:59, 29 September 2025 (UTC) This is an issue of WP:DUE (also WP:MINORASPECT and WP:VNOT), not of reliability. End of discussion. Not everything credibly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 178
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 08:33:01hard time making a case that WP:MINORASPECT applies. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC) MINORASPECT is exactly the part of DUE I had...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 30
Senin, 2025-04-07 09:28:39unless sources about the bills' history specifically mention this (per WP:MINORASPECT). Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 03:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 83
Kamis, 2025-09-04 00:45:50Content that doesn't belong in an article might be WP:UNDUE or too WP:MINORASPECT, or even excluded because of WP:NOTTRIVIA. But not because it's "unnotable"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 13
Sabtu, 2023-04-22 02:06:42Each item derived from routine media is (basically by definition) a WP:MINORASPECT and thus is not encyclopedic to include in the body of an article, which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 199
Jumat, 2024-05-10 12:47:47deaths are not notable in their own right. Births and deaths are a WP:MINORASPECT of each given year, and they do not warrant such massive coverage in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 70
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 01:53:0917:39, 3 September 2025 (UTC) Looks like, until somewhat recently, WP:MINORASPECT was a subsection of WP:DUE, while now it's a subsection of WP:BALANCE...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1240
Rabu, 2025-04-02 12:28:10made the classic Wikipedian move of citing UNDUE when I really mean WP:MINORASPECT, the adjacent part of the NPOV policy that deals with details/aspects...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 185
Selasa, 2025-01-14 17:43:55sense for inclusion of a deadname to go above and beyond WP:DUE and WP:MINORASPECT. JoelleJay (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC) Oppose per Some1, Trystan...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2023
Minggu, 2023-07-30 19:02:35WP:FACR 1c for reasons of overemphasizing what per the sources is a WP:MINORASPECT. TompaDompa (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Indeed, non-actionable, I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1206
Rabu, 2026-06-03 03:06:35conflicting information. I'm assuming they were likely thinking of WP:MINORASPECTS. Thinking that Graywalls acts in a good faith, I attempted to bring up...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 255
Minggu, 2025-03-30 02:11:13either WP:SPS or fail WP:PUBLICFIGURE, and gives undue focus to a WP:MINORASPECT of the subject. (This is not including the Carlson information) Would...
Click to read more »