ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article...

points:- Prose The form of your first sentence is specifically rejected by WP:MOSBEGIN. Furthermore, the next sentence: "For the purposes of this list..." etc...

Islamabad in the past 100 years" is exactly repeated in the rainfall chart. WP:MOSBEGIN says: "If the page is a list, do not introduce the list as "This is a list...

demonstrates its failure to be encyclopedic in its first five words; from WP:MOSBEGIN: “If the page is a list, do not introduce the list as "This is a list of...

statement of the definition, something like " Idée Fixe is ...", as per WP:MOSBEGIN.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 19:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Perhaps a minor...

is an outstanding summary of Nazi Germany, and a textbook example of WP:MOSBEGIN in practice "The return to economic stability gave the regime enormous...

into a short first paragraph. In my opinion that style accords with WP:MOSBEGIN. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC) PS: I'm as much to blame...

subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Also please see WP:MOSBEGIN about the first paragraph of the lead: The first paragraph should define...

ruined the article. He refused to understand or to agree with others on WP:MOSBEGIN, WP:STYLE, WP:SYN, WP:RS, MOS:IMAGES, WP:IG, and purpose of "See also"...

subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Also please see WP:MOSBEGIN about the first paragraph of the lead: The first paragraph should define...

states that "Both dictionaries and encyclopedias contain definitions". WP:MOSBEGIN states that "The first paragraph should define the topic". The provision...

section). Not entirely sure that I agree with this. My understanding of WP:MOSBEGIN is that the opening paragraph of the article needs to establish context...

paragraph should summarize the entire content of the article - please see WP:MOSBEGIN. Given the length of the article, I'd suggest adding an entirely new introductory...

reviewers at FAC to iron out all these questions. - Dank (push to talk) WP:MOSBEGIN recommends that the first paragraph should provide a definition and overview...

demonstrates its failure to be encyclopedic in its first five words; from WP:MOSBEGIN: “If the page is a list, do not introduce the list as "This is a list of...

God we don't need to resort to IAR to solve this; the guidelines at WP:MOSBEGIN are actually quite reasonable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)...

statement of the definition, something like " Idée Fixe is ...", as per WP:MOSBEGIN.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 19:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Perhaps a minor...

states that "Both dictionaries and encyclopedias contain definitions". WP:MOSBEGIN states that "The first paragraph should define the topic". The provision...

Lede: I think the first sentence should be changed in accordance with WP:MOSBEGIN: it should refer to the sinking as the most significant connected event...

Karluk" into it. Perhaps you can break it up into two sentences? Per WP:MOSBEGIN, you don't really have to include the title verbatim. --Der Wohltemperierte...

belief that the site is conservative (NPOV violation and Undue Weight). WP:MOSBEGIN - The primary aspects of the lead are summary in nature, this particular...

paragraph should define the topic with a neutral point of view"; see "WP:MOSBEGIN". The 2012 genetic study seems to upturn a traditional apple cart. I am...

section). Not entirely sure that I agree with this. My understanding of WP:MOSBEGIN is that the opening paragraph of the article needs to establish context...

work recently, but would say that the current lead is consistent with WP:MOSBEGIN. Between Norwegian, Norse, and Scandanavian diaspora - I can find about...

promotion of discrimination against LGBT people," based on WP:MOSINTRO and WP:MOSBEGIN. While there may be support for Still's version further down in the article...

paragraph should summarize the entire content of the article - please see WP:MOSBEGIN. Given the length of the article, I'd suggest adding an entirely new introductory...

paragraph should define the topic with a neutral point of view"; see "WP:MOSBEGIN". The 2012 genetic study seems to upturn a traditional apple cart. I am...

biographies follow this general pattern which is also supported by WP:MOSBEGIN which part of WP:LEAD. MilborneOne (talk) 17:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)...

someone else on the talk. It goes again Manual of Style, if one looks at WP:MOSBEGIN. Belorn (talk) 08:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC) First, you have twice stated...

reviewers at FAC to iron out all these questions. - Dank (push to talk) WP:MOSBEGIN recommends that the first paragraph should provide a definition and overview...

Lede: I think the first sentence should be changed in accordance with WP:MOSBEGIN: it should refer to the sinking as the most significant connected event...

is an outstanding summary of Nazi Germany, and a textbook example of WP:MOSBEGIN in practice "The return to economic stability gave the regime enormous...

points:- Prose The form of your first sentence is specifically rejected by WP:MOSBEGIN. Furthermore, the next sentence: "For the purposes of this list..." etc...

into a short first paragraph. In my opinion that style accords with WP:MOSBEGIN. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2011 (UTC) PS: I'm as much to blame...

Karluk" into it. Perhaps you can break it up into two sentences? Per WP:MOSBEGIN, you don't really have to include the title verbatim. --Der Wohltemperierte...

Style/1 WP:Manual of Style 2012-02-23 2004-07-28 3 40 3 44 Help:MOSBEGIN WP:MOSBEGIN Help:Introduction to the Manual of Style/All WP:Manual of Style/Lead...