Wikipedia:NACEXP

Search Results: Wikipedia:NACEXP

Redirect to:

Wikipedia:Non-admin closure#Editors who are experienced

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

From a shortcut: This is a redirect from a shortcut in any namespace to a page in any namespace.
- Shortcuts are wikilinked on community pages, talk pages, and edit summaries, but not in mainspace articles.

To a project page: This is a redirect from any page inside or outside of project (Wikipedia: or WP:) space to any page within the project namespace (not to a project talk page). The above category link leads to a list of redirects from inside project space. Redirects from outside project space are automatically sorted to Category:Redirects to project namespace.

To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Wikipedia:Non-admin closure

Sabtu, 2026-07-18 13:04:20

understands their mistakes, and will not repeat them. Shortcut WP:NACEXPWP:NACEXP Administrators, as experienced editors who have passed a community review...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Non-admin closure/draft

Sabtu, 2021-11-27 14:55:53

can close discussions, please check the list below. Shortcut WP:NACEXPWP:NACEXP As experienced editors who have passed a community review, administrators...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive306

Selasa, 2025-09-23 21:36:14

who should not have closed this discussion: MattLongCT does not meet WP:NACEXP WP:BADNAC#2 and WP:NACPIT#1; this close was inevitably controversial...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1073

Jumat, 2024-03-01 21:40:13

years, with 40k+ edits. I haven't done a thorough review, but I think WP:NACEXP has been met based on my cursory review. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:26, 29 July...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1064

Sabtu, 2026-07-11 08:00:37

00:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC) I've reopened the discussion per WP:BADNAC and WP:NACEXP. It is technically not appropriate for a non-admin to force-close and collapse...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 March

Kamis, 2019-02-28 07:01:05

relatively new and inexperienced with the process. I would argue that per WP:NACEXP this user should not be closing ANY TFD discussions. I also want to be very...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2017 October

Selasa, 2022-05-17 11:33:47

controversial case [21] – which NACs are not supposed to close. Please read WP:NACEXP carefully, along with first law of holes. You've barely been here two months...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 March 8

Kamis, 2021-08-19 15:45:29

relatively new and inexperienced with the process. I would argue that per WP:NACEXP this user should not be closing ANY TFD discussions. I also want to be very...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Recall petition signature threshold and length

Rabu, 2026-02-04 22:42:41

if the arguments would be spurious. Ideally a non-admin that passes WP:NACEXP would close this. CNC (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2026 (UTC) That this section...

Click to read more »