Search Results: Wikipedia:NACRFC
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Non-admin closure
Sabtu, 2026-07-18 13:04:20discussion, such as voluminous talk page archives. Shortcut WP:NACRFCWP:NACRFC Any uninvolved editor can close a request for comment or RfC. However, these...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive347
Minggu, 2024-05-19 16:58:01only issue is WP:BADNAC, what do you think we should do in light of WP:NACRFC? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:29, 30 September 2022 (UTC) Its a BADNAC because...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Non-admin closure/draft
Sabtu, 2021-11-27 14:55:53discussion, such as voluminous talk page archives. Shortcut WP:NACRFCWP:NACRFC Any uninvolved editor can close a request for comment or RfC. However, these...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive342
Jumat, 2022-07-22 04:12:23proposal. I.e., overturn to no consensus. No issue with the {{nac}}; per WP:NACRFC, ny non-admin close of an RfC should not be overturned if the only reason...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 23
Senin, 2026-03-16 07:14:44determined by counting votes. The closer (who need not be an admin, see WP:NACRFC) considers the strengths of the points put forward by both sides; they may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive382
Selasa, 2026-08-11 19:00:37consensus, although implicit, had already been reached. I agree with WP:NACRFC (an essay specifically covering non-admin closures like this one) when it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive362
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 22:35:25deliver an appropriate closing statement, as needed. I recognize that per WP:NACRFC, a non-admin close of an RfC should not be overturned if the only reason...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive381
Sabtu, 2026-07-25 19:00:13the fact that it was a non-admin closure to a controversial topic See WP:NACRFC. Thanks, Feeglgeef (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2026 (UTC) Responding to #4, it's...
Click to read more »