ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Shortcuts WP:VE:NAMEDREFSWP:VE:NAMEDREFS WP:VE/NAMEDREFSWP:VE/NAMEDREFS WP:VECRUFTWP:VECRUFT This is a Wikipedia project page for those interested in the...

tool there are a number of citations that can be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS: i.e, Fischer p. 230, and Dwyer p. 244. — AustralianRupert (talk) 10:26...

11 appear to be to the same source, they could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; the web sources cited in Citations # 1 and 13 should be embedded so the...

to be the same (Staff Vol 1 p. 11) and should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; Citations # 57 and 58 (Tarrant, p. 282) appear to be the same and should...

have an accessdate; refs 8, 9 and 15 could be consolidated with the WP:NAMEDREF there is information in the lead that isn't in the body, for instance the...

the old days editors did not usually make the extra effort to use WP:NAMEDREFS and repeat references multiple times or make multiple specific page references...

[1]  Done citations to the same source should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; many of the citations are currently just barelinked urls, these could...

Changed box details citations # 15 and 16 could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS as they appear the same. changed thought I had caught all these. Anyway...

the same reference is used multiple times it can be combined into a WP:NAMEDREF don't use all caps in titles per WP:ALLCAPS the External links section...

2009 (UTC) Duplicate references/citations should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS. I think I saw at least one (Carpenters encyclopedia of Carpenters);  Done...

Inglorious Basterds"; citations # 35 and 36 should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS as you consolidate others (van der Bijl, p.49 ); the date ranges in the...

infobox not mentioned in article text? Combine identical refs - see WP:NAMEDREFS Publisher for ref 12? Ref 14: what is "w/e"? Need consistent formatting...

references that are to the same page number could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS, although I don't think this is a requirement for a higher rating (I might...

which does not seem sufficient. If you need to repeat citations, the WP:NAMEDREF function works well breadth of sourcing: currently the article references...

here be "division"? citations 38 & 41 could probably be combined as a WP:NAMEDREF is there a corresponding long citation for "WO 167/262"? Also, I suggest...

"McLaughlin, p. 299" (Citations # 11 and 14) could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS as you've done this already for McLaughlin p. 146; Good catch, done.--Sturmvogel...

again? There are ways to add multiple links to the same footnote; see WP:NAMEDREFS for details. But the draft also has other problems, for example with its...

listed in the References. If you want to use named references, see WP:NAMEDREFS. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC) Craftronics365 (talk ·...

(1907), Vol 2, p. 372"] are the same and could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; In the lead, I think that the opening paragraph should mention the parties...

comment added by 98.212.144.72 (talk) 20:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 20:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Please remove again......

understand this question completely, perhaps this is what you need: WP:NAMEDREFS. There is much information also at WP:CITE and the full page at the previous...

(UTC) " Sondhaus, p. 90" is repeated in the citations, but should be a namedref like the others Good catch, fixed. Thanks AR! Parsecboy (talk) 15:56, 7...

41 appear to be the same and should therefore be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS (you've done this with others, e.g. # 37, etc.); fixed In the Citations...

Citation #7 and 10 look the same and could probably be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; the capitalisation of the book title "Battleships and battle cruisers"...

should be able to support more content than just two sentences. See WP:NAMEDREFS for how to cite a source more than once. If you want to contrast the draft...

to the same source (Tarrant, p. 195) and could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS (you've done this for a few others already). — AustralianRupert (talk)...

& 8 appear to be the same, and probably should be consolidated as WP:NAMEDREFS done "Gazan's division lost over 40 percent of its men, colors, and several...

As per Yellow Monkey's comment these should be consolidated using WP:NAMEDREFS; As per my comment in the Armed Forces of the Empire of Brazil review...

you are discussing. Meters (talk) 08:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS Meters (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Thanks, I was able to successfully...

can always clean them up later. The most pertinent documentation is WP:NAMEDREFS. I combined the two references to Tenhovaara as an example. I've also...

improvement I strongly suggest is that you learn about how you can use WP:NAMEDREF to avoid repeating the same reference multiple times. This will make your...

use the same source for multiple paragraphs, I would suggest using a WP:NAMEDREF and repeating the citation as that will make it clear where the information...

wikimedia category Proposing changes to results of a multiple use of a namedref? Picture thumbnail doing weird stuff Cite document - Unnecessary error...

better, so here's a few helpful links for that: WP:CITE, WP:CITEX, WP:NAMEDREFS As for the structure, I think it looks great. Although I don't believe...

04:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC) Sure you can! Read the instructions at WP:NAMEDREFS and look at reference #1 in the same article as an example. GoingBatty...

12:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Thanks, Osborne 12:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC) i need some help 4 a lost...

December 2009 (UTC) Citations # 12 and 18 could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS as you have done with the others. Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 00:42, 26 December...

name="author" />. See also {{Refref}} and WP:CITE.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC) WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 00:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)...

REFB. And if you want to cite the same source more than once, please use NAMEDREF which keeps the footnote list clean and tidy. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk)...

be looking for WP:NAMEDREF. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC) Thank you, Tenryuu, though I think that WP:NAMEDREF could explain the...

tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. "Architecture", "Garden Inspired by Gertrude Jekyll"...

(talk) 23:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Please follow the instructions at WP:NAMEDREFS. GoingBatty (talk) 01:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Fixed FWIW editor has been...

but doesn't indicate its sourcing; Some sources are consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS, but others are not (for example 41 and 42 "Branded as Rebels"; Some of...

this the same as citation 62 (Cooper)? If so, I suggest just using a WP:NAMEDREF suggest sorting the Bibliography alphabetically by surname Done. AustralianRupert...

than one where an already defined reference we reused by name. See WP:NAMEDREF. --ColinFine (talk) 19:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC) "List of people who have...

</ref>, not with </ref name>. See Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:NAMEDREFS for further information. Deor (talk) 09:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC) greetings:...

16 and 18 appear to be the same and should be consolidated with a WP:NAMEDREFS (as it has been done already with some others); Citations # 17 and 18...

to the article must either accompany a reference or be tagged using WP:NAMEDREFS. AldezD (talk) 02:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC) You keep saying that, but where...

115.70.23.77 (talk) 01:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC) Combined references per WP:NAMEDREFS. GoingBatty (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC) Thanks for including that...

2023 (UTC) Hello, Srbernadette. Please check out the instructions at WP:NAMEDREFS. Cullen328 (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)  Done - I've done it for you...

to the cite error tool, this ref might need to be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS: "First Submerged Circumnavigation 1960, p. B-5.", can you please check...

help Maya Frida Barr (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Take a look at WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Does anyone here know if there...

once, but use it within a named reference. All the details are at WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC) No; I am using three different...

and then a very brief reference tag is used elsewhere. Please see WP:NAMEDREFS and try it yourself. Cullen328 (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Thanks...

41 appear to be the same and should therefore be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS (you've done this with others, e.g. # 37, etc.); fixed In the Citations...

and then a very brief reference tag is used elsewhere. Please see WP:NAMEDREFS and try it yourself. Cullen328 (talk) Maurice Magnus (talk) 03:12, 12...

article. If you are trying to use the same ref more than once, see WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 20:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Yes, CTJF83 20:55, 2 June 2011...

July 2022 (UTC) Hello, VersaceSpace. Follow the procedure described at WP:NAMEDREF. Cullen328 (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC) @VersaceSpace Fixed for you...

example ;) ––FormalDude talk 06:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC) You can read WP:NAMEDREFS for the instructions on how to do this. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk)...

added by TheInformation14 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC) That's all explained at WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 20:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)...

editorial discretion). But you don't have to repeat the citation - see WP:NAMEDREF for how to reuse citations. ColinFine (talk) 10:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)...

everything including a possible page number to be identical then see WP:NAMEDREFS. If you want to change page numbers then see Help:Footnotes#Citing one...

sources used in the last sections as references for this. You could use WP:NAMEDREFS if you want to avoid extra citations. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:55, 24...

Knowland"; Citations # 6 and 48 "Moreman, p.13" should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; Citations # 22 and 63 "Chappell, p.15" should be consolidated per above;...

having to duplicate all of the bibliographic details. Please read WP:NAMEDREFS for the details. You need to be very precise with the syntax. A single...

(talk) 16:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Hello, IP user. This is explained in WP:NAMEDREF. When a reference is added to an article, it may optionally be given a...

2015 (UTC) @QuentinUK: You replaced an opening named-ref tag (see WP:NAMEDREFS) with a plain <ref> tag, which left a reference further down in the article...

reviewed relevant policy/guideline pages WP:REFNAME, WP:CITEFOOT, and WP:NAMEDREFS, in regard to merging duplicate references. Each of these explains that...

Person (talk • contribs) 19:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC) Also dealt with at WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC) You might also look at Template:Rp...

time. Best Wishes AnkhMorpork (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 21:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC) When in the printable version...

--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC) All explained at WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 14:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC) Is the Texas City Dike...

simply be shortened. --Olduch (talk) 23:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC) Would WP:NAMEDREFS work there? I have seen a reference to a bot-generated title, I think...

TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC) (ec)From Wikipedia:NAMEDREFS#Footnotes:_using_a_source_more_than_once: Names may not be purely numeric...

multiple times or just multiple pages from the same domain? But WP:OPCIT, WP:NAMEDREFS, and WP:DUPREF might help. Though for some references there might already...

but if you do want to use the same ref multiple times, please see WP:NAMEDREFS for guidance. Also note that although he may have won the constituency...

tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. ...I've just done that, to your draft, for "Grandy,...

citation 31 and 32 appear to be the same -- please consolidate using a WP:NAMEDREF, or differentiate with separate page numbers is the ground clearance figure...

(except in the lead). If you are citing the same source multiple times, see NAMEDREFS. But if there is only one suitable source for the content of an article...

copy-edit to improve clarity and flow Combine identical references per WP:NAMEDREFS "Battered by tempests, attacked by pirates and finally forced aground...

to have been added in your edits. The process to deal with it is at WP:NAMEDREFS. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC) I have already logged...

welcome. If I'm understanding you correctly, then yes it is possible. See WP:NAMEDREF and WP:OPCIT. Regards, Zindor (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC) @Zindor:...

reference, hence the error. I have removed the code for now. Please see WP:NAMEDREFS for further assistance.--ukexpat (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks...

name was removed, but the reference was invoked in another place. See WP:NAMEDREFS. --  Gadget850 talk 16:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC) It's been so long since...

addition the multiple entries (like the a b c) are generated by using namedrefs. Take a look at Help:Referencing for beginners for more information.Naraht...

tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. It begins, The mysterious Sam Pa is believed to be the...

will try that. Thanks. Carsonmc (talk) 02:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC) WP:NAMEDREFS explains it. – ukexpat (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC) Do you cite...

increase their visibility])"; Source 4: Repeat of the source above; see WP:NAMEDREFS for how to fix this, for any useful sources you might cite multiple times;...

fine, just make sure to not name the two references the same thing (WP:NAMEDREF). One reference should contain a link to the archive, while the other shouldn't...

source Mossypiglet (talk) 23:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC) It's explained at WP:NAMEDREFS. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Hello- How do...

Their use on Wikpedia is frowned upon as they lead to confusion. WP:NAMEDREFS are preferred. – ukexpat (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Is there a Tool...

been removed. --David Biddulph (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC) On WP:NAMEDREFS, it says to include a given reference within <ref name>...</ref> tags...

wikipedias give different results when a source is used more than once using namedrefs. The English language version looks like 4 ^ a b c reference here. The...

that gives the illusion of substance and weight (by not following WP:NAMEDREFS. Og of Bashan (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC) That's a pretty bold statement...

is common to cite the same source multiple times in an article: see WP:NAMEDREF for how to do it. As to your second question: definitely. The requirement...

good quality source can be used multiple times in an article. See WP:NAMEDREFS for an explanation of the coding. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:06, 12...

references, to avoid inflating the 'References' section unnecessarily; see WP:NAMEDREFS for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Thank...

guide. --Kateshortforbob 16:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Similar stuff at WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 16:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC) thanks a lot! —Preceding unsigned...

Purplewowies (talk · contribs) has combined the references for you; see WP:NAMEDREFS for guidance on this. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:44, 5 December 2011...

help! —Untitledmind72 (talk) 01:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Take a look at WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 02:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC) I want to add a name to the...

The numbering (and relative ordering) is subject to change when the WP:NAMEDREFS are moved around in the article as a whole. I agree it might not be that...

an opening tag and a closing tag, but if there is I don't know it. WP:NAMEDREFS says the syntax to define a named footnote is <ref name="name">content</ref>...

then ideally you would avoid these by using named references (see WP:NAMEDREFS), but it's not a cardinal sin if you don't. If you mean repeating sources...

that gives the illusion of substance and weight (by not following WP:NAMEDREFS. Og of Bashan (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC) That's a pretty bold statement...

18:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC) Hello, Was Kisevalter Nash?. Take a look at WP:NAMEDREFS, which describes another option. Cullen328 (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2023...

course of course. Thanks. Kenmcl2 (talk) 02:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREF. In short, instead of putting fact 1<ref>Source</ref> and fact 2<ref>Source</ref>...

first time you use it, and thereafter refer to it by name. Please see WP:NAMEDREFS. --ColinFine (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC) I recently contributed...

the same reference are certainly allowed, though it's neater to use WP:NAMEDREFS to combine them The incubator is long dead. articles for creation is the...

addressed: could the citations that are the same be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS? (I don't know if is necessarily a requirement, so I won't oppose on this...

comment added by Mikerooney (talk • contribs) 22:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC) WP:NAMEDREFS. May I ask where you looked? You can't improve our help pages unless we...

an error when one tries to do that (by using #tag:ref or {{refn}} and namedrefs not appearing in the article text). I edited one article (Krishnamurti's...

--Senra (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC) All further explained at WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Also note that the full...

Citing the same source multiple times would ideally be done using WP:NAMEDREFS, yes, but not doing so wouldn't be a reason to decline a draft. -- DoubleGrazing...

added a refname for the Eagle bio and used that namedref where it appeared in the article (see WP:NAMEDREFS). I think this one is well worth a nomination...

23:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC) You wanted {{doi|... instead of {{doi:... per {{doi}}, and see WP:NAMEDREFS. 75.166.200.250 (talk) 01:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)...

61-2); citations that have the same content could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS (an example of citations that could be consolidated are citations #21...

information. --ColinFine (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC) And see also WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2012 (UTC) I have some nice photos...

m=l+1; m<namedRefs.length; m++) { if (namedRefs[m]==namedRefs[l]) { Duplicates++ namedRefs.splice(m...

05:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC) While you're waiting for review, please read NAMEDREF and consolidate multiple citations to the same source. It might not make...

use the same source for multiple paragraphs, I would suggest using a WP:NAMEDREF and repeating the citation as that will make it clear where the information...

raw link in the body and combined the duplicative references (see WP:NAMEDREFS). Now, go use some of the many better sources you can find through a search...

The relevant policy/guideline pages are WP:REFNAME, WP:CITEFOOT, and WP:NAMEDREFS. Grouping duplicate references is highly preferable to leaving them ungrouped...

creating a reference tag? Osomite (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC) Does WP:NAMEDREFS or Help:Referencing help?--ukexpat (talk) 19:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC) If...

Sorry. 115.70.23.77 (talk) 03:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Please read Wikipedia:NAMEDREF thoroughly. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC) @IP 115.70...

@StrongALPHA. That should be done using a named reference, as explained at WP:NAMEDREF. Come back with follow-up questions if you need to. Mike Turnbull (talk)...

(yes, I know that could be counted with multiple entries using the same namedref as 1 or many, don't care). I'm also fine on whether this is a continually...

want to avoid the awkward mixture of citation styles, you can use WP:NAMEDREFS to have the source appear just once in the list of references, and use...

January 2024 (UTC) Hi there! For instructions on how to do this, see WP:NAMEDREFS. GoingBatty (talk) 14:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC) I recently replaced one...

(UTC): w:de:User:Se4598 (t - c; 13755) to w:de:Benutzer:Benutzer:Se4598/BA NamedRefs/complex/10 (diff  top?) - Link: www.openpr.com/news/236440/Canadian-b...

(note the closing slash (/)): <ref name="Newton2003"/> See more at WP:NAMEDREFS. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC) I have...

reference?Amanda Smalls 18:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Hey @Amanda Smalls: WP:NAMEDREFS is what you're looking for. To put it simply, you give a reference a name...

referencing there now. You can find more information on what I did at WP:NAMEDREFS. As it says there, the first instance of the reference you use the first...

do so if the source supports several statements in the article (see WP:NAMEDREFS for advice). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC) helpful...

used to be used in the early days, but are really discouraged now. WP:NAMEDREF says, Names must not be purely numeric; they should have semantic value...

tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result. You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>...

cite the same source multiple times by naming your references: see WP:NAMEDREFS. --ColinFine (talk) 11:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Thanks ColinFine. That...

by name whenever it is used again. The wiki syntax is explained at WP:NAMEDREFS. Be careful since a tiny error will mess things up. Cullen328 Let's discuss...

Angelandlinda (talk • contribs) 02:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Please see WP:NAMEDREFS. The long and short of it is that the first time you use a reference you...

Ikhtiar H (talk) 09:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Further explanation at WP:NAMEDREFS.--ukexpat (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Is there a way to add a...

rather than an "opening" ref tag. See WP:Referencing for beginners and WP:NAMEDREFS for further help.--ukexpat (talk) 15:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC) to add...

for using the same reference more than once and that's explained at WP:NAMEDREFS. Hope this helps.  – ukexpat (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Hi. I am...

first time you use it, and thereafter just referencing it by name. See WP:NAMEDREFS for the details. --ColinFine (talk) 22:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Hello...

_Inc. Esemque (talk) 23:53, 6 August 2015 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS for the references thing. Eman235/talk 00:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Welcome...

resource. BelmarBradley (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC) As to #3, see WP:NAMEDREFS. #4, you sign messages on article and user talk pages and pages like this...

Yes, you can reuse the same source multiple times in an article: see WP:NAMEDREF for how to do it. But, "prov[ing] something's existence" is almost irrelevant...

referenced. It's fine to reference the same source multiple times (see WP:NAMEDREF for how to do it) - but an article which depends almost entirely on a single...

(UTC): w:de:User:Se4598 (t - c; 13755) to w:de:Benutzer:Benutzer:Se4598/BA NamedRefs/complex/8 (diff  top?) - Link: domovina.110mb.com/zivotopisi/budak-mile...

reliable source, and in most cases to an independent reliable source (see WP:NAMEDREF for how to use the same source more than once). --ColinFine (talk) 17:27...

tool there are a number of citations that can be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS: i.e, Fischer p. 230, and Dwyer p. 244. — AustralianRupert (talk) 10:26...

copy-edit to improve clarity and flow Combine identical references per WP:NAMEDREFS "Battered by tempests, attacked by pirates and finally forced aground...

Citation #7 and 10 look the same and could probably be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; the capitalisation of the book title "Battleships and battle cruisers"...

Excellenc1. You can combine multiple references to the same source using WP:NAMEDREF. --ColinFine (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC) Hello Excellenc1. Also if...

potentially it is because you are using a WP:NAMEDREF. Where the ref is slightly different, the namedref won't quite achieve what you intending. The rp...

44 citations are far fewer than that because some are repeated (see WP:NAMEDREF). More seriously, many of them are obviously not reliable (eg Facebook...

but doesn't indicate its sourcing; Some sources are consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS, but others are not (for example 41 and 42 "Branded as Rebels"; Some of...

name, and the other times you just give the name, and no content. See WP:NAMEDREF. --ColinFine (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC) A practical hint - find an...

addressed: could the citations that are the same be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS? (I don't know if is necessarily a requirement, so I won't oppose on this...

audience applause, not a sausage 04:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC) And see WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 20:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Unresolved  – Jezhotwells...

There's a source with <ref name=":0">, which should be changed per WP:NAMEDREFS Changed (also submitted it to the Wishlist a few weeks back, as a perennial...

exists Ghislaine de Give (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS for your first question and the {{Dead link}} template for your second...

don't know why VE does this "genfix", but it shouldn't do so. See WP:NAMEDREFS: "Quotes are optional if the only characters used are letters A–Z, a–z...

Ningishzidda (talk • contribs) 17:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC) Have you read WP:NAMEDREFS? That should tell you what you need to know -- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\[alternative...

to be the same (Staff Vol 1 p. 11) and should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; Citations # 57 and 58 (Tarrant, p. 282) appear to be the same and should...

16 and 18 appear to be the same and should be consolidated with a WP:NAMEDREFS (as it has been done already with some others); Citations # 17 and 18...

to be the same (Staff Vol 1 p. 11) and should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS; Citations # 57 and 58 (Tarrant, p. 282) appear to be the same and should...

Cheers mate! Λuα (Operibus anteire) 20:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC) See WP:NAMEDREFS. – ukexpat (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2009 (UTC) I like the way you fixed it...

sources used in the last sections as references for this. You could use WP:NAMEDREFS if you want to avoid extra citations. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:55, 24...

without any other bells and whistles would be very welcome. See WP:VE/NAMEDREFS for phab tickets about this, and other related info. Mathglot (talk) 07:03...

Changed box details citations # 15 and 16 could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS as they appear the same. changed thought I had caught all these. Anyway...

citation 31 and 32 appear to be the same -- please consolidate using a WP:NAMEDREF, or differentiate with separate page numbers is the ground clearance figure...

infobox not mentioned in article text? Combine identical refs - see WP:NAMEDREFS Publisher for ref 12? Ref 14: what is "w/e"? Need consistent formatting...

this the same as citation 62 (Cooper)? If so, I suggest just using a WP:NAMEDREF suggest sorting the Bibliography alphabetically by surname Done. AustralianRupert...

& 8 appear to be the same, and probably should be consolidated as WP:NAMEDREFS done "Gazan's division lost over 40 percent of its men, colors, and several...

template 8bit12man (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2025 (UTC) @8bit12man WP:NAMEDREFS. I can't reach http://dev-isw.bivings.com/ is it the same as https://www...

the same source multiple times, you can use named references, see WP:NAMEDREFS. Whereas if you want to cite specific and different pages of the same...

the old days editors did not usually make the extra effort to use WP:NAMEDREFS and repeat references multiple times or make multiple specific page references...

everything automatically for you. This can also be done in wikitext with WP:NAMEDREFS. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC) Ah ok, thanks, I will...

be implemented now at the discretion of editors. There is WP:LDR, WP:NAMEDREFS and WP:SFN that cover issues raised above. Visual editing tools also help...

that section you see what you expect to see. See WP:REPEATCITE and WP:NAMEDREFS. Polygnotus (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2024 (UTC) If we change our name...

draft has other problems such as repeatedly duplicated references. See WP:NAMEDREFS for how to correct that. Also, this person is supposedly notable for their...

simplest way to show which page(s) are relevant each time is to use WP:NAMEDREFs with the template {{rp}}. See the linked documentation for the details...

QuicoleJR (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC) QuicoleJR, please read WP:NAMEDREFS. In brief, you fully define the reference once, assign it a name, and...

2024 (UTC) What you're looking for is the Named References feature, WP:NAMEDREFS explains how to use them. Amstrad00 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)...

source multiple times using named references. For instructions see: WP:NAMEDREFS If you are citing multiple times from a longer work (books, long journal...

html. Soafy234 (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC) @Soafy234 see WP:NAMEDREFS. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Hi...

(cloudy contribs…) 19:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Full guidance is at WP:NAMEDREFS. Folly Mox (talk) 22:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC) @Blueskiesdry: As far as...

please? Agapanthus49 (talk) 14:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC) @Agapanthus49: WP:NAMEDREFS allow you to re-use citations. Polygnotus (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2024...

at the citations in your draft: 1,2,11 (all the same source: please see NAMEDREF) and 10 are interviews, so not independent sources, and do not contribute...

(talk) 14:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC) References {(edit conflict) Please see WP:NAMEDREF. This reference is defind somewhere else in the article, and merely reused...

should be removed. You can cite a source multiple times if needed, see WP:NAMEDREF for guidance on how to do this without duplicating the citations in the...

just one of the many sources is used somewhere else in the article (WP:NAMEDREF) then it can be much simpler to insert a footnote. Sungodtemple (talk •...

same reference in different places. You will want to take a look at WP:NAMEDREF to "bundle" them, in a sense. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:40, 3 April 2025...

only used on a fraction of them. We are considering to pick up WP:VE:NAMEDREFS as a future project, but we cannot make any promises at this point. Johannes...

27 November 2023 (UTC) @Westwind51000: Welcome to the Teahouse! See WP:NAMEDREF to learn how to use named references more than once in the same article...

single citation, while still being able to cite it multipe times. See WP:NAMEDREF for guidance. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC) Thank you...

in two by type of chapter which means figuring out which ones have the namedref in the other grouping. Not sure I'd done any of this type of thing in userspace...

assigns to a particular reference for the purposes of the article. See WP:NAMEDREF. It's possible that what you are talking about is Harvard referencing,...

2023 (UTC) @The Capitalist forever: No, you used named ref tags. See WP:NAMEDREF for guidance. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC) Nevermind, I...

the same page of a book, then just use the same reference twice. See WP:NAMEDREF for the details of the coding. Follow those instructions carefully. A slight...

May 2024 (UTC) @Fauji Enthusiast: Yes it does reuse references using WP:NAMEDREF RudolfRed (talk) 03:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) It's really easy if you use Visual...

Polygnotus/DuplicateReferences will help you identify duplicate references, and NAMEDREFS are the preferred method for citing the same source multiple times in...

There's a source with <ref name=":0">, which should be changed per WP:NAMEDREFS Changed (also submitted it to the Wishlist a few weeks back, as a perennial...