ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

of Kitty Genovese is appropriate. Shortcuts WP:BASICWP:BASIC WP:NBASICWP:NBASIC People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in...

to escape WP:A7, I'm not seeing enough for WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:NBASIC. I have searched for sources and conclude that the ones currently cited...

RAJU(T) 15:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC) Keep Before WP:NACTOR there is WP:NBASIC and she has significant coverage in reliable sources. Mujinga (talk) 16:57...

performance in an election does not affect their notability if they already meet NBASIC, which Orlins does based on the links provided by Andrevan, as well as this...

to meet at least WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC) None of the sources provide deep coverage to meet NBASIC Cinder painter (talk)...

significant coverage that means a large majority of the players pass WP:NBASIC. It is clear that the current list of 'notable' leagues is far too large...

notability. Included source table examining the sources in the article. WP:NBASIC: Sources are not reliable, not independent, or lack significant coverage...

TrangaBellam (talk) 06:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Argument for keep: Appears to meet WP:NBASIC notability guideline. Has at least one bio (Krishnakumar, 2007), plus is...

notability is based on her being a controversial child artist. Passes WP:NBASIC, with significant coverage found in the references at pt:Melody_(cantora)...

JSTOR · TWL) Has never played in a WP:FPL game and does not appear to pass WP:NBASIC according to the sources in the article as well as searches in Google News...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:COLLATH / WP:NBASIC. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

gonna go keep on this one. Appears to meet WP:NBASIC. Policy-based rationale follows. The rules: Per NBASIC People are presumed notable if they have received...

JSTOR · TWL) Sources only have fleeting reference to his name. Fails WP:NBASIC rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Strong & speedy keep Even sources provided on the article alone establish WP:NBASIC, let alone the numerous (mostly in Bengali) out there which aren't included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The individual fails WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG; there are not multiple independent reliable sources that cover...

WP:NBASIC, the latter the minimum notability requirement for individuals. IMO, should be redirected to Survivor: Nicaragua. In case he fails NBASIC, failing...

series.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC) Keep – meets WP:NBASIC and unlikely that she won't meet WP:NACTOR in very short order. —Joeyconnick...

that mean he also meets WP:NBASIC, which is what an individual like Sheehan is supposed to pass? I did mention WP:NBASIC because it's required for any...

surprised but the consensus here is that this individual's coverage meets WP:NBASIC Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...

Lancet, Congressional Record, and The New York Times meet WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. VickKiang (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Keep as above + WP:NEXIST...

him, couldnt find any information on him, but his own website. Fails [WP:NBASIC]] and WP:ANYBIO. Further, seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO. --RealPharmer3 (talk)...

Thesixserra (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Delete doesn't meet WP:NBASIC, nothing in RS more than MD & CEO of the bank, needs depth of coverage as...

September 2023 (UTC) Keep, there are plenty of sources here for WP:NBASIC. Note that NBASIC allows us to combine non-significant coverage from multiple sources...

(eliminated). Nonetheless, I'm too cautious about this person's compliance with WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG. I'm even hesitant to consider him a "notable" podcaster just...

Keep: As per above, passes WP:NBASIC. Taabii (talk) 11:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC) Keep per Lobbymaster and Monhiroe, meets the NBASIC criterion, with significant...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Delete: Article clearly fails WP:NBASIC. Chronos.Zx (talk) 15:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Comment I can not find any substantial...

Baseball. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Keep - Meets NBASIC; besides the sources already in the article, there are articles about Leonard...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. The two sources in the article appear to be biographies put out...

is not notable enough to have an article. Does not meet criteria for WP:NBASIC / WP:ANYBIO RealPharmer3 (talk) RealPharmer3 (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2023...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This individual appears to fail WP:NBASIC, which presumes notability only when multiple published secondary sources...

JSTOR · TWL) Brazilian artist and academic. The sources do not satisfy WP:NBASIC: we have some basic web profiles, a feature or two for his art projects...

July 2023 (UTC) Keep per Siroxo and Indefensible above as meeting both NBASIC and MUSICBIO. It would be a bit surprising IMO if an Afghan singer with...

verified by other sources. I think that this is on the verge of GNG and NBASIC bar, but your mileage may vary. No such user (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2023...

NBIO / NBASIC; it does not have the authority to overrule the authority on which it is based! (i.e. SPORTCRIT does not have more power than NBASIC); per...

reliable sources independent of the subject here, as needed to satisfy WP:NBASIC. No reason to think he satisfies WP:SINGER either. Dionysodorus (talk) 13:12...

in the article) [1][2], but even with those, I don't think it meets WP:NBASIC. The first one is based on an interview. The second one does quote Hudson...

fails WP:GNG/WP:NBASIC. The sources in the article as of the time of posting do not demonstrate that this person passes WP:GNG/WP:NBASIC and can be described...

While the story is long and detailed, it alone is not sufficient for WP:NBASIC because it fails the multiple element. Ljleppan (talk) 08:14, 26 June 2022...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy WP:NBASIC. – Meena • 14:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

only has one passing match report mention. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

significant coverage that suggests notability. Subject does not meet WP:NBASIC. ––FormalDude talk 13:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

24 October 2021 (UTC) Delete I can’t see that he meets WP:NACTOR or WP:NBASIC. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

there would be online coverage if he were truly notable enough to bass WP:NBASIC. — Mhawk10 (talk) 08:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Delete, seems to be a fairly...

were not citing NBASIC, you were citing GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC) This isn't a legal forum, I paraphrased NBASIC - which obviously...

far enough to meet NBASIC. Skynxnex (talk) 16:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC) Keep Sources provided by Geezygee and Skynxnex satisfy WP:NBASIC.Jacona (talk) 00:58...

EcoWizard (talk) 06:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC) Keep. She clearly passes WP:NBASIC based off of the coverage... in the article's sources. The Mint piece, while...

JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to pass notability under either WP:NPROF or WP:NBASIC. Seems to just run her own practice and do self-promotional things. Mason...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NARTIST, none of the current sources are reliable and independent...

there are sufficient appropriate sources to establish notability under WP:NBASIC. The sources cited are all brief mentions in passing, except for two newspaper...

Persian name, I was unable to find any evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

fail WP:SPORTCRIT. The other potentially relevant notability criteria (WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG) have the same standard of multiple independent reliable sources...

of Pakistan per WP:BIOSPECIAL, as the subject currently does not meet WP:NBASIC but meets one of more of the additional criteria. If WP:SIGCOV is found...

many players with this name but this particular Bonsu appears to fail WP:NBASIC. The two references provided are trivial mentions of the subject and searches...

BabbaQ: Even if she meets NPRODUCER, what about WP:NBASIC? Per WP:BIOSPECIAL, if she fails NBASIC more importantly, what can be alternatively done to...

combine the paragraphs to establish notability (which is allowed per WP:NBASIC), we have a good case to be made here. The consensus you're referring to...

passing mention, it is not enough for a Wikipedia article on its own per WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG. Google News has no hits, DDG has only user-generated content...

7 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. I don't see anything here that meets WP:NBASIC: just brief profiles and passing mentions. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:56, 7...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPOL. I cannot find coverage that satisfies WP:NBASIC. This page has been repeatedly recreated by socks in the past at various...

or primary sources (like interviews) don't demonstrate notability per WP:NBASIC or WP:CREATIVE in the slightest. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 19:58, 27 December...

son confers zero notability and this article on it's own merits fails WP:NBASIC. Per WP:OTHERSTUFF, just because other non-notable articles have thus far...

Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC) Delete - Clearly fails WP:NBASIC Not much WP:SIGCOV available and reliable sources are to lacking deep coverage...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NBASIC or WP:NMUSIC. ––FormalDude talk 22:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

that this author meets WP:NBASIC, or that the author whose article this was before it was hijacked per Duffbeerforme met WP:NBASIC either. Dionysodorus (talk)...

limited references, and seems to be WP:PROMO. I believe this subject fails WP:NBASIC. Sebastien1118 (talk) 20:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

Delete. Nothing significant or demonstrating notability with respect to WP:NBASIC or WP:CREATIVE without seriously stretching. (Update: adding missed signature...

Our World. The three sources that provide WP:SIGCOV are enough to meet WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Keep per above...

(UTC) Keep: the sources in the article are enough to demonstrate an WP:NBASIC pass. They're clustered a bit in 2015, but Ortega has been the subject of...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This individual appears to fail WP:NBASIC and WP:ENTERTAINER. Out of the sources currently in the article, the only...

Football Database which are far from meeting the requirements of GNG and WP:NBASIC. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Lollywood but nothing truly detailed. No evidence of WP:CREATIVE or WP:NBASIC. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP:NBASIC is met from the sources presented by others, and my own online searching is not able to find anything that would contribute towards WP:NBASIC....

Bungle (talk • contribs) 08:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Keep. First, the rule: WP:NBASIC reminds us that People are presumed notable if they have received significant...

consensus here is that coverage of this article subject does establish WP:NBASIC although there is a vocal opposition to this interpretation. If editors...

Olympics#Shooting - Potentially relevant guidelines/policies include WP:GNG, WP:NBASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:NOLYMPIC. There is no specific notability...

Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC) Keep  – passes WP:NBASIC. Quite controversial and well known name in Punjab's politics. Many IND...

seeing from the notability point of view, then it certainly doesn't pass WP:NBASIC. There could be a chance of WP:UPE as well, since articles like this (whose...

a decent consensus to keep from editors arguing Gerard meets NAUTHOR or NBASIC. (non-admin closure) SWinxy (talk) 02:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [Hide this...

this book about Pud Galvin. Based on these sources, I believe he meets NBASIC, and in any case I don't think deleting this article would improve Wikipedia...

14:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Keep Subject passes WP:JOURNALIST and WP:NBASIC. Ikemefuna Umeadi (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

independent RS, so I am fairly confident that this individual fails WP:NBASIC and should be deleted per WP:DEL-REASON#8. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 21:12...

with citing two different articles in it. If you're making reference to WP:NBASIC, which requires sources to be intellectually independent of each other,...

fails WP:NCRIC and I can't find sources indicating that they would pass WP:NBASIC. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

18:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. The individual appears to fail WP:NBASIC; I am unable to find reliable sources that indicate that this is a notable...

of notability is given here, nor does the individual appear to pass WP:NBASIC. It seems to be the case that the creator of the page removed a CSD tag...

article passes the notability guideline for people, which states under WP:NBASIC, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple...

notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Delete, not an NBASIC or NENT pass. It is my opinion that articles like this—that have been repeatedly...

on a footballer that doesn't meet any relevant guidelines (WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC). Google News has nothing. A Singaporean source search only comes up with...

April 2026 (UTC) Keep as she has coverage in reliable sources, meeting WP:NBASIC. ~2026-19196-78 (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2026 (UTC) You added three new articles...

located, but I saw a lot of other shorter ones so I think this might pass WP:NBASIC - I may expand this later. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC) @Nerd1a4i:...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This priest appears to fail WP:NPOL, WP:NBASIC, and WP:ANYBIO. On a side note, reference 4 in the article do not appear...

of whether coverage prompted by the Skoda Prize meets the threshold for NBASIC from whether the prize meets ANYBIO.) We also have this piece in the Hindustan...

section about him in this article about his children, I think Esposito meets NBASIC, which specifically says "multiple independent sources may be combined to...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not meeting WP:NBASIC, and tagged since February 2024 for notability, missing multiple independent...

Waterfield Advisors are also noteworthy. The subject meets the criteria under WP:NBASIC.Lobbymaster (talk) 09:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC) @Lobbymaster is a Wikipedia:SPA...

Oaktree b, the MLB.com article, and this article, I believe Singer meets WP:NBASIC. Hatman31 (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Comment - Also, in terms...

there must be multiple notability-contributing sources to establish WP:NBASIC. NicolausPrime (talk) 22:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Passing mentions...

WP:SIGCOV doesn't say anything about "local coverage", and neither does WP:NBASIC. Hatman31 (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC) Keep, meets GNG per Hatman31...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject appears to fail WP:NBASIC Headphase (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Aviationwikiflight to piece together to pass notability guidelines. As per WP:NBASIC, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple...

provide coverage about the subject, there is also [[5]], which allows for WP:NBASIC to be met. Let'srun (talk) 20:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC) Delete. Nowhere...

reliable/independent sources or claim of notability in the article. Fails NBASIC. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 23:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks the in-depth needed coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC) Delete – No evidence of notability...

sources failing WP:INDEPENDENT. And even if they are RSs it fails WPGNG or WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 07:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

far and on this bio in David Nemec's Rank and File, I believe Drake meets NBASIC. Hatman31 (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. I'm seeing enough coverage...

selection of them the article (from a one sentence stub). Person meeting WP:NBASIC with coverage that is much, much more than barrel mentions. Made main contributions...

TWL) Submitting to AfD due to subject's questionable notability per WP:NBASIC. The article's secondary sources are mainly about Peloton and include the...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not seem to meet WP:NBASIC - most of the cited sources have only trivial coverage or are not independent...

contributing towards notability, so these obviously don't help meet WP:NBASIC. "Voice of the Cape" is a local religious community radio station, and "Politics...

WP:ANYBIO nor WP:NJOURNALIST. The sources also appear to easily fail WP:NBASIC and I cannot find sources online that indicate that this criteria is passed...

this individual by multiple independent RS, so this individual fails WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG. I have no objection to redirecting his page to the roster section...

inherited notability. Such case, the article fails WP:NPOL, WP:ANYBIO and WP:NBASIC (unless of course in-depth coverage could be uncovered which I suspect doesn't...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:NBASIC. The only sources found are databases and passing mentions. Tails Wx 03:10...

Redirect to Alef Aeronautics: since that is what he is known for. Fails WP:NBASIC. Interviews do not count towards notability. All other coverage focuses...

is not LinkedIn; no WP:SIGCOV about the subject. The individual fails WP:NBASIC, and as a result I'm inclined towards deletion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:26...

unreliable and promotional content, the result is a stub that does not meet WP:NBASIC. My search did not turn up any additional sources that could suggest notability...

enough independent coverage within them and others to at least meet WP:NBASIC. S0091 (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC) @S0091: Just curious, could...

significant coverage in multiple independent sources, as required for WP:NBASIC. There is nothing that would satisfy WP:MUSICBIO either. Dionysodorus (talk)...

individual outside of WP:SPS. There is no indication that he passes WP:NBASIC or WP:NARTIST. This might well be a WP:G11, but we're already this far along...

have only passing references to him and have insufficient depth for WP:NBASIC. I have not found any additional reliable sources with a web search. Verbcatcher...

October 2021 (UTC) Delete doesn't appear to meet WP:NPROF, WP:NAUTHOR, or WP:NBASIC. No independent sources found. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2021...

meet WP:NACTOR. On top of that, I can't find sourcing that would cover WP:NBASIC. And, in any case, an article that focuses solely on a living individual...

24 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks the in-depth coverage needed to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

coverage beyond institutional profiles. Does not clearly meet WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. Shinadamina (talk) 04:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC) @Shinadamina: Can you elaborate...

sources found on Newspapers.com ([1] [2] [3] etc.) contribute to pass WP:NBASIC. (Side note: appears that the page should be moved to Tonya S. Holly.) Hameltion...

18:54, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. No sources that would satisfy WP:NBASIC, and no reason to think he meets WP:ACADEMIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:15...

towards notability, but more independent coverage is needed to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(talk) 15:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh...

Well, WP:NBASIC and WP:N should apply as well. Even if she might meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:BIOSPECIAL matters more, especially if she fails NBASIC. George Ho...

2023 (UTC) Delete. Basically no sources that we use that contribute to WP:NBASIC or WP:NCORP. Skynxnex (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

JSTOR · TWL) Article about a non-notable individual that does not meet WP:NBASIC and WP:ANYBIO. As written, the article contains substantial evidence of...

received a well-known and significant award or honor'. She also passes WP:NBASIC because there are multiple reliable secondary sources about her. I agree...

WP:GNG that includes subject-specific notability and NBIO that includes NBASIC and ANYBIO. A withdrawn governorship bid does not even warrant honorable...

02:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NMUSICIAN and also fails WP:NBASIC by quite some way. Not even one reliable, independent source located. All...

August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks coverage in independent sources to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NBASIC, WP:ENTERTAINER, WP:NACTOR, and WP:ANYBIO. There's also an apparent COI...

nothing special and definitely not enough to establish notability. Fails WP:NBASIC, of all 37 sources used in her article only two are secondary, the first...

19 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Insufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I can find nothing to indicate they pass WP:NBASIC or WP:GNG. They appear to be just another politician who stood for election...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC. Unable to find coverage from reliable sources which is both independent...

from that era), I think the sourcing is now strong enough to keep under WP:NBASIC ("If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then...

00:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks independent coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Naftali"  // Timothy :: talk  06:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC) Keep. We have WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG-level coverage of this individual, as he has been covered by multiple...

writing and 45 producing credits to his name. At the very least, passes WP:NBASIC. Keep. Based on the Emmy nominations alone he meets the basic criteria for...

notability as a real estate agent and an account executive per WP:N and WP:NBASIC (and WP:BIOSPECIAL). Also, I'm unconvinced that being a Bachelorette runner-up...

significant coverage in multiple independent sources, as required for WP:NBASIC. There is nothing that would satisfy WP:MUSICBIO either. Dionysodorus (talk)...

Azerbaijan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. I was only able to find brief mentions of, and quotes from, the subject...

independent SIGCOV outside of the already-cited MLive.com article. Fails NBASIC. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 23:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

privacy issue here that should be accounted for. However, she fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NJOURNALIST as far as I can tell, so I'm inclined to delete the page...

21:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC) Delete: clearly does not meet the standards of WP:NBASIC. ––FormalDude talk 15:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC) Delete The problem is the...

(talk) 08:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Delete - individual does not pass NBASIC Nosebagbear (talk) 14:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Delete Beyond the major...

standard than what is generally accepted in AfDs. Like many editors, I find NBASIC overly permissive, and believe we should require BLPs receive SIGCOV as...

reliable, independent, and non-trivial sources demonstrating a passing of WP:NBASIC or other NBIO criteria. VickKiang (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) I...

the individual. Therefore the sources don't seem to support that the WP:NBASIC threshold is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC) The above...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC, isn't notable as they're the wife of someone who was a ruler. Dr vulpes...

the coverage present in the article alone is enough to clearly pass WP:NBASIC. If this coverage were only in the coverage of one event there would be...

covered here by WNCT-TV. On balance, I think this adds up to a pass of NBASIC/ANYBIO. Hatman31 (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC) keep passes WP:GNG...

things. Oaktree b (talk) 02:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NAUTHOR. I can't find significant coverage in secondary sources of...

the recently removed guideline WP:NFOOTBALL but no evidence of passing WP:NBASIC. No relevant coverage in the hits at Google News or an Indonesian source...

21:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. No sources sufficient to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Could possibly be redirected to The Hollywood Standard, but not sure if...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NBASIC, you could also use WP:G7. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. All of the coverage that I could find in reliable sources, such as The...

(talk) 03:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

one interview and a load of passing mentions: none of this satisfies WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...

played - there are many more. What you have quoted as WP:NBASIC is actually WP:GNG. WP:NBASIC states that "If the depth of coverage in any given source...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet NBASIC. Majority of the sources are not significant or reliable. ––FormalDude talk...

multiple. I am not seeing an NBASIC pass here. But a source analysis is welcome. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC) NBASIC does mention that quote...

coverage above plus more under subject's Korean name "이두행": "이두행". The bar for NBASIC is met. --Habst (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Which pieces of coverage...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPOL and WP:NBASIC. Nothing has changed since the last two AfDs as far as I can tell. C F A...

2024 (UTC) Delete, fails all relevant notability guidelines of WP:GNG, WP:NBASIC and WP:NCORP in its current status. All sources are PR distributed material...

23:15, 28 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet WP:NGYMNAST or WP:NBASIC. Jfire (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. There is some minor coverage of Turner, [1] & [2], but not really enough...

passing mentions.-KH-1 (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NBASIC, references are blog news, interviews and profiles. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:42...

profiles for the artist or his projects, and so appear not to satisfy WP:NBASIC. I can see no evidence that he has been recognised by multiple independent...

Pershkoviski (talk) 20:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC) Delete No reliable sources. WP:NBASIC. 128.6.36.94 (talk) 20:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

multiple reliable sources independent of the subject, as required under WP:NBASIC. I can't see anything to satisfy WP:MUSICIAN either. Dionysodorus (talk)...

7 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. The individual appears to fail WP:NBASIC in addition to WP:NSOCCER from the sourcing I can find. — Mikehawk10 (talk)...

notability and one cannot find substantial secondary coverage. WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC not satisfied. Textcurator (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

article, or on the basis of a quick Google search, that would satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

may be notable, but I think that he (as an individual) doesn't pass WP:NBASIC. Janhrach (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

establishing notability, but I don't think this is sufficient to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

food reviews of others. None of what I found meets WP:NJOURNALIST or WP:NBASIC. TarnishedPathtalk 02:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...

last few hours. Consensus of this discussion is that the subject meets WP:NBASIC, the article is not an attack page, and that sufficient coverage in independent...

for resources on Irmas provides little indication of notability per WP:NBASIC. The three citations are all reviews of films associated with the subject...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Comprehensively fails WP:NBASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. There is nothing to indicate that "Skymit...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No-notable yoga master and author, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:AUTHOR. Refs are primary and unreliable, notability doesn't establish...

the state of sourcing in an article. As the individual appears to pass WP:NBASIC, and this clearly isn't a WP:BLP1E or WP:BIO1E situation, the only conclusion...

(talk) 21:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Delete on account of subject...

in multiple reliable and independent sources, of the kind needed for WP:NBASIC. I can't see anything that meets WP:ARTIST either. Dionysodorus (talk) 14:37...

Spider) 18:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC) Delete - no evidence of notability...

Lacking significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Doesn't meet WP:NBASIC. Frost 15:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

appears almost certainly enough to write a good article in compliance with WP:NBASIC. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

amount to significant coverage in sources independent of the subject per WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:09, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Delete-would have to...

(American TV series) season 20 would suffice. Indeed, WP:BIOSPECIAL and WP:NBASIC still apply, regardless of WP:NACTOR... or WP:ANYBIO. Even reappearing in...

Oregon. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:33, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NBASIC, or alternatively WP:ORGCRIT TheAlienAdventures (talk) 23:10, 23 September...

nom, business blog posts, brief mention in few reliable sources, fails WP:NBASIC M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...

they're mere interviews. Otherwise, no other sources found that are WP:NBASIC nor WP:MUSICBIO-worthy, both in English or Hindi languages. ~ Tails Wx 19:14...

author's voice are enough to meet sigcov. I'm definitely a Keep on this per WP:NBASIC, with the sources mentioned in this discussion being enough to demonstrate...

☎ ✎ 19:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. No evidence that he meets WP:NBASIC, WP:POLITICIAN, or WP:ACADEMIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2025...

interpretation of NBASIC. If that's how it's intended to be read, it contradicts itself. Hatman31 (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC) How? NBASIC explicitly...

that this passes WP:NAUTHOR, never mind WP:NACADEMICS. Thus falls to WP:NBASIC which, again, the sources appear to not reach. Only sources that have even...

insufficiently comprehensive to reach the significant aspect of NBASIC. The subject thus fails NBASIC. At the same time, there are credible arguments that the...

𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 05:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOL. Nothin at all in RS. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:03, 29 January 2023...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG (WP:NBASIC).--Анатолий Росдашин (talk) 17:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

11:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC) Weak keep I feel a bit iffy every time the WP:NBASIC requirement for "multiple" is reached with exactly two sources, especially...

America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NENTERTAINER. I did not find significant coverage or any reliable...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject doesn't meet WP:NBASIC or WP:ENT. I have removed some poorly sourced personal information, but...

citations for the statements made; there's certainly nothing to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Also, the subject has a feminine forename (and appears to be a woman on...

Beccaynr. Jfire (talk) 04:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) Keep - Meets WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC per Beccaynr, though that lede could use some trimming as far as the WP:CITEOVERKILL...

pass to an article - Akk articles need to meet GNG or at the very least NBASIC. –Davey2010Talk 13:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Most? ? Really? How many do we...

multiple reliable sources independent of the subject, as required by WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

has been the subject of coverage in his own right that would satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NBASIC. Only claim to fame is being a member of Tangerine Dream. Notability is...

coverage in independent secondary sources, of the kind that would satisfy WP:NBASIC. The source cited above by Ravage Metal is just a bio by a publisher who...

company is potentially notable, but the individual doesn't seem to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

what I can find. My search for sources similarly turns off a fail for WP:NBASIC, so I don't think that this individual is notable. — Mhawk10 (talk) 07:00...

addition to his own diary) significant coverage? To the extent that WP:NBASIC is met? In "Marriage in Ireland, 1660–1925" (2020), Luddy and O'Dowd (pages...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not finding significant coverage as required by WP:NBASIC. Most of the articles I'm finding are about other topics that mention him...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC) Delete: per nom, fails WP:NBASIC. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Even WP:NBASIC is mostly impossible. As such, non-notable pastor. Vanderwaalforces (talk)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC. Article lacks any citations and only contains one external link to the...

JSTOR · TWL) Notability doesn't established, fails to meet WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NBASIC, primary sources, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources. M.Ashraf333...

2026 (UTC) Redirect to Konqueror#Web browser as WP:ATD. Doesn't pass WP:NBASIC. It surprises me that the article has made it through 2 AfDs already. WidgetKid...

the subject in her own right by independent sources, as required by WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 16:52, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete — Subject still...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG (WP:NBASIC).--Анатолий Росдашин (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC) Automated comment:...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOET. Nothing in the article, or in a Google search, describes why...

reading of NBIO is this. If WP:NBASIC is met, then this biography should not be merged or redirected to another article. NBASIC is only not met if the coverage...

December 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG criteria in WP:NBIO, WP:NBASIC and WP:ANYBIO criteria. Limited material for WP:V. QEnigma talk 07:47, 27...

Spider) 08:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Osarjusz (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC) Keep. Frank Bayard passes WP:NBASIC by attaining significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources...

article's description, but I don't think that person meets WP:NMUSICBIO or WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC) The above...

unfortunately I don't see any independent significant coverage to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Possibly WP:TOOSOON but presently not notable. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:53...

information about him (not signficant coverage but could contribute to WP:NBASIC), and so does this book. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:20, 14 May 2026 (UTC)...

startup founders according to the Tech In Asia database. Subject meets WP:NBASIC & WP:ANYBIO. There are more coverage Fortune India, Hindustan Times, Entrepreneur...

demonstrated if an article on a person is to be included on Wikipedia per WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG (WP:NBASIC). Closest I could get to finding sources that establish notability for this...

players. It's etter than nothing, but don't seem sufficient to pass WP:NBASIC. Fram (talk) 16:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC) Thank you, WP:NFOOTY indeed was limited...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Notability doesn't established, fails to meet WP:NBASIC, no in-depth presence in reliable sources, primary and unreliable sources...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG (WP:NBASIC).--Анатолий Росдашин (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC) Automated comment:...

✗plicit 13:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC) Keep more sources added and now pass WP:NBASIC for multiple mentions in several credible and reliable independent third...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NBASIC. There's this, a no-byline, likely promotional piece, and this, an interview...

notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:NBASIC.dsrprj (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Current sourcing is obviously deficient, and I was not able to find GNG or NBASIC meeting references per a search. The roles are especially minor and fails...

believe WP:NPOL overrides WP:NBASIC (which is a copy of WP:GNG). Unless you think there is a reason to disregard NBASIC/GNG. Muhandes (talk) 19:31, 21...

director and producer of non-notable short films, fails per WP:DIRECTOR and WP:NBASIC. I can't find any reliable sources about her short films and awards won...

somewhat routine but still offer enough significant coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. It's not like he's a losing candidate; he was elected as mayor of a large...

primary-source interviews--none of which contribute towards meeting WP:NBASIC. AccessWire is a public relations wire service. Face2Face Africa is owned...

adequate sourcing. Tone is pretty promotional too. Delete Does not pass WP:NBASIC and does not meet the bar for WP:ANYBIO or any other additional criteria...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails notability requirements under WP:NBASIC as none of the sources have significant coverage of the individual and a...

23:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC) The comparable guideline for persons is WP:NBASIC, which McCaffery clearly passes as well.Frank Anchor 14:13, 7 October 2022...

14:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks independent coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Delete I can only find promotional...

relating to his legal practice give him passing mentions not enough to pass WP:NBASIC. Santa Saana (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

contribs) 15:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG Whitemancanjump23...

DMySon (talk) 02:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC) Delete- lacks notability, WP:NBASIC. RS6784 (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

subject talked about himself. I would say that the article does not meet WP:NBASIC due to a lack of independent coverage, and would note that the creator of...

sources. The few ones that look reliable are not enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

coverage by reliable sources for this individual. Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:NBASIC. A draft also exists at Draft:David Combs. Frost 17:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)...

coverage in reliable sources is lacking. Does not meet WP:NSPORT or WP:NBASIC. Frost 05:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC. Only claim to notability seems to be as (presumptive?) holder of a hereditary...

reliable sources independent of the subject, of the kind required to meet WP:NBASIC. Nor is there anything in the artist's achievements or exhibitions that...

songs to big music celebs and his fashion. No sufficient notability per WP:NBASIC and WP:MUSICBIO. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC) The above...

find significant coverage of this artist, so the artist appears to fail WP:NBASIC. Looking at the various criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, he doesn't appear to pass...

WP:NSPORT and I am unable to find coverage that suggests he would pass WP:NBASIC despite a thorough online search. As such, I believe him to be non-notable...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:NBASIC, have minor coverage due to her recent death, otherwise not significant...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC. Mostly press releases and trivial mentions. The only potentially useful...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Meets WP:ANYBIO but not WP:NBASIC; thus, per WP:BIOSPECIAL, I suggest merging or preferably redirecting to...

significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, the subject passes WP:NBASIC. The guideline also says "If the depth of coverage in any given source is...

(talk) 09:25, 13 September 2025 (UTC) Keep, per coverage found. Meets WP:NBASIC. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC) Withdraw/Keep per the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC to be a stand alone article. Mekomo (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2025 (UTC)...

tangible thing. Does WP have notability criteria for concepts, other than WP:NBASIC? 73.127.147.187 (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2022 (UTC) I see that "impermanence"...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Teague fails WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG; I couldn't find any reliable sources with significant coverage...

notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOET. I was unable to find significant, independent coverage of...

multiple reliable sources independent of the subject for the purpose of WP:NBASIC, nor anything that would satisfy WP:AUTHOR. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:50, 7...

Bearian (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. No obvious sign that WP:NBASIC or WP:JOURNALIST is met. Dionysodorus (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2025 (UTC)...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet NBASIC, only claim to notability appears to be inherited from CPUSA. A BEFORE search...

régime de Vichy", and the State Council plaque should be sufficient for WP:NBASIC. There are other short mentions, perhaps some longer ones, on GScholar....

referring to the subject in his own right, of the kind that would meet WP:NBASIC. Also, this person is a minor nineteenth-century criminal; merely being...

to be written for promotional purposes and fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. Sources make up mostly of self published or press releases with the exception...

nomination work. Article has nothing to pass WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. Patre23 (talk) 11:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

12:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails notability guidelines as per WP:NBASIC. Redtree21 (talk) 12:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Comment the article is pretty...

Delete. No significant coverage in sources independent of the subject, so WP:NBASIC is not satisfied. Dionysodorus (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC) The...

managed Tems from their early career to Grammy Award. This manager meets WP:NBASIC when all sources that discuss him are combined. Some of those sources are...

doesn't apply, then how about WP:BIO1E, WP:PAGEDECIDE, WP:NBASIC, and/or WP:BIOSPECIAL? (Failing NBASIC but meeting WP:NACTOR still doesn't make him an exception...

ping me. GiantSnowman 18:48, 27 June 2025 (UTC) Delete, doesn't meet WP:NBASIC or WP:GNG as a lot of the sources are quite trivial or not significantly...

reliable. Sgubaldo (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NACTOR. Available sources are just passing mentions, I did not find...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable entrepreneur that fails WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. Sources are passing mentions. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)...

Eddie891 Talk Work 16:25, 6 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Subject fails WP:NBASIC. मल्ल (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2026 (UTC) Comment: The subject is a friend of...

Michigan and Penn. there's arguably enough for a decent biography / pass of WP:NBASIC in my opinion considering the obit which is at least one piece of sigcov...

being "laughable" how about clearly explaining why this person passes WP:NBASIC WP:NARTIST or WP:NACTOR and what sources support them passing. 163.1.15...

Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Keep: meets WP:NBASIC. Promotional content can be removed. No reason to delete an article on a...

he was eliminated from. I hope I'm wrong about him not complying with WP:NBASIC and WP:N, and I hope I'm wrong about him being notable for only being the...

reliable sources on this subject, nor is there enough (see WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC). Additionally, for the information that is there, it seems to revel on...

her career. Beccaynr (talk) 01:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Keep as she meets WP:NBASIC. Beccaynr dug up some good sources. I'd add this in-depth piece from the...

16:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Significant coverage is the similar language in WP:NBASIC, which applies to people. Slywriter (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Here's...

in particular nothing that even gestures in the general direction of WP:NBASIC. -- Visviva (talk) 00:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NENTERTAINER. I was unable to find significant coverage of this dancer...

failed to find any significant coverage of this biography article to meet WP:NBASIC. The most I could find were blog reviews of his books and interviews, which...

team competitors) and many others. One could certainly write a quality, WP:NBASIC-compliant article here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2025 (UTC) Keep...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACADEMIC. On NBASIC, in the article at time of nomination there were four...

reliable sources. Muneebll (talk) 12:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC) Keep - per WP:NBASIC and WP:ANYBIO. The subject has significant coverage in multiple reliable...

(talk) 14:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

2 July 2026 (UTC) Keep: The article subject appears to meet WP:GNG/WP:NBASIC through multiple independent secondary sources with substantial coverage...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NBASIC. In hopes of meeting WP:NAUTHOR, I searched multiple sites for book reviews...

assumption that WP:NACTORS suffices, this person must also comply with WP:NBASIC per WP:BIOSPECIAL. I've still yet to see reliable independent sources verify...

rather than setting rules or attempting to establish any variances from WP:NBASIC and NSPORT in general. Shortcuts WP:NCURLWP:NCURL WP:NCURLINGWP:NCURLING...

clear. KlayCax (talk) 22:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. IMHO WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC are easily met, The New York Times is definitely RS, Antiques (magazine)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:GNG (specifically WP:SIGCOV), WP:NBASIC, or WP:FILMMAKER. There is no mention of any films actually made, and the...

[4]which are enough to prove this person's notability and clearly passes WP:NBASIC SATavr (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2025 (UTC) Keep [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. I...

[[3]], [[4]], [[5]], and [[6]]. I'd say there is enough here for a WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG pass. Let'srun (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC) Keep - per above...

secondary sources. This clearly satisfies WP:GNG as well as WP:NGOLF and WP:NBASIC. From the looks, the coverage is both substantial, independent, and also...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC, there is passing coverage of Mao but nothing about him directly. He is...

improved sources after nomination. The current sources meet at least WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

badly sourced article about a musician was apparently brought up to WP:NBASIC standards using similar minor independent publications from around the US...

lack WP:SIGCOV of the actor. This actor fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. I did not find significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources on the...

editing" - Arjayay (talk) 21:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR.—Alalch E. 17:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails...

represents significant coverage in multiple independent sources per WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

Delete Does not make a claim that satisfies WP:ARTIST. Does not pass WP:NBASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Existing sources are 100% primary. I searched the web and...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:COLLATH / WP:NBASIC. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

nothing was found mentioning or discussing the subject failing WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 16:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. I can't see anything that would meet WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete: no WP:SIGCOV...

significant coverage in multiple independent sources, as required to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I believe that the subject fails WP:NBASIC, the notability criteria for biographies. I have checked all 25 references...

notability, so he'd have to pass some other notability guideline (such as WP:NBASIC) to be notable. To a bit of my surprise, I was unable to find significant...

31 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (politics) and WP:NBASIC. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC) Delete There is no evidence...

had mentioned the wrong criteria by mistake. At this point, BLP passes WP:NBASIC. Jeraxmoira (talk) 13:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, none of the sources...

20:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Weak keep Although she does not meet the WP:NBASIC criteria, she has acted in multiple films, thus meeting the [WP:ENT]] criteria...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Fails WP:NBASIC. ANYBIO is not applicable. C F A 💬 02:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Delete...

part of additional criteria, so there is an expectance they would meet NBASIC anyway. An individual winning on award, with no reliable SIGCOV to base...

and my search mainly found trivial mentions, therefore IMO WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC are probably failed. However, @Dflaw4: has stated there might be a list...

Estopedist1 (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Delete. No reliable sources WP:NBASIC. Redirect is a good option too I think. 128.6.36.94 (talk) 20:22, 7 May...

individual fails the relevant WP:NSPORT guideline and appears to fail WP:NBASIC based upon my analysis of sources. The article sources do not confer notability...

to meet Criterion 2. None of the criteria remotely apply here. Fails WP:NBASIC: The article has a Bloomberg article that's behind a paywall that I haven't...

Portuguese article about him, and added sources. I suppose it passes WP:NBASIC. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 18:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Delete I looked...

alimony/child support, outrageous parties and opulent houses that he might meet WP:NBASIC as well. Jacona (talk) 00:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC) Keep. The sources are not...

to Military patrol at the 1924 Winter Olympics. Doesn't look to pass WP:NBASIC or WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC) What about the fact...

WP:NBLP or WP:NBAD. Article cites 4 sources total, all of which fail WP:NBASIC. One is just a profile, one leads to nothing, one is just a page of results...

sources uncovered by JTtheOG contain the needed coverage to meet the WP:NBASIC as they provide in-depth coverage of the subject. Let'srun (talk) 17:59...

and India. Thesixserra (talk) 02:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NBASIC, as creator refusing it into the draft, the topic is WP:TOOSOON. M.Ashraf333...

primary except few, winning contests doesn't make her notable. also fails WP:NBASIC M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. I agree with gidonb, I can't find any sources that meet all of the notability...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable politician, who has never won an election. Fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOL. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC) Note:...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:56, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. Nothing to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. per nomination...

with the other sources (e.g., this and this), there's enough to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Cbl62 (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC) Keep, per Cbl62's sources. Maybe...

(talk) 18:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Merge Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. If more sources are found, I would be pleased to reconsider my !vote. MrsSnoozyTurtle...

Keep The coverage is a bit piecemeal, but in total I think it meets WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC and per nom, no significant coverage found. Tails Wx 02:43, 30 November...

François-Xavier Bagnoud. Subject lacks in-depth coverage to meet the WP:NBASIC threshold. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

multiple sources independent of the subject, as required to establish WP:NBASIC, cannot be found in the sources cited or through a quick Google search....

August 2023 (UTC) Keep. Subject is notable and clearly satisfies the WP:NBASIC. —Mevoelo (talk) Keep . The subject meets the WP:GNG However, it can be...

(UTC) Delete: I was unable to find anything that would suggest they pass WP:NBASIC. ––FormalDude (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC) Migrate to Draft I'm...

trivial mentions in blogs and mirrors of this article, so they also fail WP:NBASIC. C F A 💬 23:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Page reads as WP:PROMO. I do...

2021 (UTC) Keep, as he appears to have received enough coverage to pass WP:NBASIC. Sources need not be in English. And, while the argument that we should...

03:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Then I'll change my vote to delete. Fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NACTOR. The subject has no significant coverage in secondary sources...

on the WP page prior to this addition by the creator of this page). WP:NBASIC or WP:GNG is also likewise failed, with the existing references being non-WP:RS...

candidate spans far beyond that; I think that this individual passes WP:NBASIC as a political activist and political party leader, and did so before he...

and 2 - debunking their supposed death. Thus, I believe this violates WP:NBASIC 2.) This person does not appear to be a part of the enduring historical...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable Islamic scholar, fails to meet WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG, had in headlines from very few media due to former PM's marriage...

reliable, specific, secondary sources are still required to establish WP:NBASIC here. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Click on your own JSTOR...

answer has some details about the subject. Other sources combined would pass NBASIC. I am unable to see how the sources are promotional. Piscili (talk) 15:01...

but it's not significant enough to contribute in and of itself towards WP:NBASIC. In my view, we have one significant, in-depth reliable source. If we can...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC. C F A 11:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

example). Unfortunately, I don't think there is enough sourcing for a WP:NBASIC or WP:GNG pass here. GoldRomean (talk) 00:57, 20 March 2026 (UTC) The above...

sustained coverage in secondary sources of the kind required to satisfy WP:NBASIC. I cannot find anything that would establish notability through a quick...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC, I cannot find any article talking about him alone. The sources uses a datebase...

(talk) 21:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. Bri, it seems that Miss Exclusive might be an alternative name for Miss...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NPROF. (NPP action) C F A 16:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC and GNG. Unable to find significant coverage across independent, reliable...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable per WP:ANYBIO WP:NBASIC, references are obscure running mentions or even unrelated. Thanks, Please...

find sourcing on Google and The Wikipedia Library that demonstrate a GNG/NBASIC pass. The films he has directed do not appear to have sourcing that would...

way amount to significant coverage in multiple independent sources per WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete would appear to...

subject only consist of profilic information and routine coverage (see WP:NBASIC and WP:ROUTINE). — Alex26337 (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC) Comment...

his own sake in multiple independent secondary sources, as required by WP:NBASIC. There's also nothing that would satisfy WP:COMPOSER. The films that he...

Keep as the subject meets the notability criteria for biographies under WP:NBASIC. The sources provided satisfy the requirements of WP:SIGCOV, and the article...

discussions. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NBASIC, nothing at all in reliable sources. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:19, 30 January...

JSTOR · TWL) The sources given do not amount to significant coverage under WP:NBASIC. The Telegraph and Argus article cited is clearly just a profile created...

rabbis, and are not of the kind that would establish notability under WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 10:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC) Delete: fails per WP:NBASIC and WP:NPOL, primary and unreliable sources. ToI is independent source but...

notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. I couldn't find any sources to establish notability of the subject. The...

notability guideline. Shortcuts WP:PW/NCRITWP:PW/NCRIT WP:PW/NBASICWP:PW/NBASIC WP:PW/NBASICCRITWP:PW/NBASICCRIT A person is presumed to be notable if they...

and Pakistan. –DMartin (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Comment:At previous...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG. Subjects lacks significant in-depth coverage from independent...

notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:NBASIC. I've found two reliable English language sources and one Urdu language...

coverage. The second offline ref might be decent (or not) but per GNG or NBASIC multiple is usually needed. Unfortunately, my WP:BEFORE mainly found trivial...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NMODEL nor WP:NBASIC. I went through and cut everything that wasn't verified in the citations...

herself, and a staff-written obit of Patten from 2004. We've got an WP:NBASIC pass for Patten, but a GNG fail on the school, and there are a number of...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPOL and WP:NBASIC; never won an election and there is no non-routine coverage outside of his...

meaningless given the absence of coverage about his winning of them; WP:NBASIC requires significant coverage in multiple sources. If an award falls in...

is good, but I couldn't find anything else. Ambassadors have to meet WP:NBASIC like everyone else. I wouldn't be surprised if more coverage exists but...

would satisfy WP:NBASIC. Unlike this time, I would individually nominate each one for deletion that fails WP:NSOCCER and WP:NBASIC, assuming there are...

2024 (UTC) It seems to me that the 50 ish refs do make the subject pass WP:NBASIC, could you specify the guideline that you are using to determine if they...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject of this article fails to meet WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG as a standalone article. Since it is concerning events during...

Spider) 16:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC) Delete unsourced BLP fails WP:NACTOR/WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG. At least two accounts and probably 1 or more anon editors appear...

unreliable and have only passing mentions about the individual, this fails WP:NBASIC, possibly stands on only insignificant WP:1E. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 17:17...

2023 (UTC) Delete Insufficient coverage in independent sources to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Keep this article, this personality...

02:53, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. Nothing sufficient to satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NBIO...

does not show even the slightest sign of references that would meet WP:NBASIC, and Google does not show up anything better. This is a totally unsourced...

or WP:GNG, because the coverage is trivial (to adopt the language of WP:NBASIC). That said, it is possible that I have missed something, so always happy...

find independent sources with significant coverage suitable to meet WP:NBASIC, and I cannot find evidence to pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPROF. I have looked...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as fails WP:NBASIC. Three sources all from the 10th July with same image and similar content...

and totally non-notable person. Sources are only self-published. Fails WP:NBASIC, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Delete...

any significant coverage of him, so he does not meet WP:GNG (or even WP:NBASIC). He appears to have had a significant role in only one film, Undead - his...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:JUDGE or NBASIC. She is a family court judge. GNG is not fulfilled, as all other sourcing...

and WP:PROF, probably wikipedia should not have a article on it, fails WP:NBASIC. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 01:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG...

(talk) 14:09, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Keep: Three articles is enough for WP:NBASIC. 🄻🄰 14:29, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

give minor coverage and those are insignificant to meet WP:GNG and or WP:NBASIC. Mekomo (talk) 07:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Per that he fails all four of the criteria. We can then fallback to WP:NBASIC to consider if he is notable per that. There are a number of sources mentioning...

29 April 2019 (UTC) Keep per the sources indicated by 137.97.184.23, GNG/NBASIC notability established. Given that the individual could get as high as possible...

elaborate on why he fails N. The sources in the article demonstrate WP:NBASIC to me. He was also interviewed in BBC Radio as an expert. SWinxy (talk)...

Jevansen (talk) 04:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC) Delete - a long way short of WP:NBASIC Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

does not pass the criteria listed by the nominator and specifically WP:NBASIC TheAlienAdventures (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC) Delete — (moderate...

The Advocate, The Standard, and Deadline, there's clear evidence of a GNG/NBASIC pass. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:53, 12 June 2022‎ (UTC) The...

international award [1]. This, along with the sources Lamona included meets WP:NBASIC. Comment An "international award" means almost nothing. Awards and award...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC. No significant coverage. C F A 💬 22:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Note:...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability per WP:NBASIC. C F A 💬 14:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(UTC) Delete - not nearly enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, nor WP:NBASIC. Onel5969 TT me 16:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per the points already made...

was excellent and detailed, one source is not sufficient for WP:GNG/WP:NBASIC. Google books doesn't show anything useful at least in the first pages....

the primary (or one of the primary) subjects of the articles; reaches WP:NBASIC. Klbrain (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Keep. Definitely notable, I found...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NBASIC or WP:GNG. Existing sources do not have WP:SIGCOV or are written by his...

require OR to extract the content, which means we're still short of WP:NBASIC. To the extent it might be a borderline case, it seems to me WP:BLP and...

on top of these, makes me believe that this article's subject passes WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG, and I see no persuasive reason to delete. — Red-tailed hawk (nest)...

(UTC) Delete: Minor criminal; no sources available that remotely satisfy WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Keep: Meets WP:BIO. Referenced...

21:42, 3 June 2025 (UTC) Keep. The subject is clearly notable as per WP:NBASIC, as being a director general of Industrial Training Fund (which had significant...

coverage. The Lapin Kansa story is good, but one source does not multiple (WP:NBASIC/WP:SPORTBASIC) make. The single para at ski.fi doesn't change that calculus...

the narrow confines of WP:ABOUTSELF but not suitable for satisfying WP:NBASIC, and (2) clearly does not satisfy WP:SIGCOV. Even if the Metro were a suitable...

✎ 04:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC) Keep. It passes WP:NCORP, WP:GNG, or WP:NBASIC. All sources used are from reliable, independent third-party media organizations...

minimum and possibly into a GA if given the chance (in accordance with WP:NBASIC – If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then...

company founder), there is insufficient biographical coverage to establish WP:NBASIC (other than press releases and other coverage about his company, the biographical...

(UTC) What is the best you could find in the Mediearkivet to satisfy WP:NBASIC? Jähmefyysikko (talk) 14:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Delete. A single well-cited...

that remotely amount to significant coverage in reliable sources under WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 17:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Keep. Meets WP:BIO. Referenced...

evidence of any significant coverage in multiple secondary sources per WP:NBASIC and no evidence of any particular notability under the criteria of WP:ANYBIO...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable academic, fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NACADEMIC SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 14:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)...

journal article, a bit of coverage of him here and here. Clearly passes WP:NBASIC and arguably WP:GNG. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)...

April 2025 (UTC) Delete not seeing sources that get them close to even WP:NBASIC and the promotional nature of the sources say it all. CPDJay (talk) 16:59...

secondary coverage, 1 major role, and maybe won a minor award, doesn't meet WP:NBASIC or WP:NACTOR. --Mika1h (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Delete : Fails WP:GNG...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable businessman, fails to meet WP:NBASIC, no in-depth presence in independent reliable sources, all are unreliable...

significant coverage in independent, reliable sources in order to meet WP:NBASIC. C F A 💬 14:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

(talk) 00:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

2024 (UTC) Keep sources noted above by Ganesha811 are enough to pass WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG, as they all have significant coverage of the subject. ~ Tails Wx...

undocumented from the article, prove this person to be non-notable (i.e., fails WP:NBASIC). Additionally, per the nominator's information, additional action may be...

with the following rationale "Additional secondary source added; meets NBASIC". I am afraid I disagree, the new source seems like a brief press release...

After thinking about this for awhile, I think I'll go with a part-IAR/GNG/NBASIC Weak Keep on this one. So, to start, this guy played nine games of Major...

Darling ☔ (talk · contribs) 23:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails NBASIC, particularly the intellectual independence requirement. Mach61 (talk) 01:08...

for me. Newimpartial (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NBASIC, no secondary coverage. I don't think he meets WP:NAUTHOR either, only major...

articles (De Stentor for instance). Many more sources can be listed. WP:NBASIC certainly apply: If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial...

back to WP:NBASIC, but WP:FILMMAKER helpfully lets us dispense with the elaborate exercise of finding and weighing sources against NBASIC in order to...

contribute toward proving the notability of a subject", according to WP:NBASIC. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 10:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NMUSIC. Article only references self-published sources. WP:BEFORE...

sources uncovered by JTtheOG contain the needed coverage to meet the WP:NBASIC. It doesn't matter if those souces are immediately added to the article...

work with. (And to the extent this might still be a borderline case under NBASIC, while Dryden is certainly not a reliable source, such an indicator of contemporary...

divisions and/or other sports may also meet notability guidelines via WP:NBASIC. @Dr vulpes: Passing GNG, as here, is all that's required. Q3 in the NSPORTS...

references, as is Newsweek, but I assume that this is just enough for a WP:NBASIC profile. StonyBrook babble 01:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC) Keep - the references...

significant independent coverage to grant notability through WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NBASIC. No significant coverage found, I did find this but it's a routine announcement...

article for deletion primarily due to WP:NACTOR. Then I realize that WP:NBASIC and WP:GNG (or WP:N itself) matter more, especially per WP:BIOSPECIAL. I...

(talk) 23:39, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Delete. I see no evidence that WP:GNG/WP:NBASIC is met based off of the sources presented here or in the article. I have...

Sanomat, Times of India, Dagbladet 1, Dagbladet 2). It looks like we meet WP:NBASIC based on the coverage. He is certainly known because of recent videos, but...

covering her. Some people argue about the depth of the sources, however per WP:NBASIC If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple...

multiple paragraphs of WP:SIGCOV regarding the subject, and is enough for a WP:NBASIC pass. Let'srun (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NBASIC (most sources fail due to lacking WP:SIGCOV or are not independent; see...

not reliable (Business Insider). Keeping this article would go against WP:NBASIC. This BLP stub has not been improved in more than a year and I believe the...

Observer (Bangladesh) 5and more. Which makes the subject at least pass the WP:NBASIC. He has also been covered for his Album from The Bangladesh Today 6as well...

of Survivor: Edge of Extinction, and hasn't made him meet WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. I even discussed this with the closing admin who insisted that reliable...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NBASIC; didn't find any reliable sources that contain significant coverage of him...

here but the complaint was sourcing issues, which I addressed. GNG and NBASIC are both passed and he is not a BIO1E. There are dozens of pages in books...

Australia (series 10) per LibStar and the nominator. And just to review WP:NBASIC, the sources need to be "substantial" in coverage. Neither the headlines...

(UTC) Keep - based on the sources presented above, Bates appears to meet WP:NBASIC, and the article should be kept rather than deleted per WP:NEXIST. Hatman31...

(talk) 05:11, 22 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NBASIC. Majority coverage comes from sources that are unreliable to establish notability...

coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject sufficient to meet WP:NBASIC. Dionysodorus (talk) 19:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC) Delete -- In addition...

cheetham (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Delete. The individual fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NMUSIC and the tone of the article is promotional. — Red-tailed hawk (nest)...

(talk • contribs • global count) 16:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per NBASIC and INVALIDBIO. The subject is a minor who has received coverage as a subject...

referring to the subject in his own right, of the kind that would meet WP:NBASIC. Also, this person is a minor nineteenth-century criminal; merely being...

(i.e., "article"). If there had been at least something approaching WP:NBASIC-type coverage enabling us to write a paragraph of prose, that would have...

notability" is dependent on sourcing requirements being satisfied per GNG, NBASIC, ANYBIO. Someone who is barely notable is a red flag. -- Otr500 (talk) 19:50...

the refs are from reliable scholarly journals, thus meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBASIC. VickKiang (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

minor actor of no note. I've failed to find enough to convince me of WP:NBASIC. Even if enough sources could be found the current article is an unsourced...

substantial, and a WP:BEFORE check pulls up very little of definite WP:NBASIC substance besides chance mentions in publications. /over.throws/✎ 03:27...

(talk) 17:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC) Delete - not enough to support...

Read! Talk! 23:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:GNG or even WP:NBASIC. Being a member of the royal family does not confer notability; they have...

those websites/news stories contributes to her notability under WP:NBIO/WP:NBASIC? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC) Hunter is notable...

better than this. Overall, I don't see what case can be made for her for WP:NBASIC or other notability criteria. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 22:31, 27 December 2022...

addition to GNG there's also one other possible route to notability: WP:NBASIC, which states that If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial...

this, this, and some other routine coverage. Likely not enough to meet WP:NBASIC but I would not be surprised if there was more coverage out there. I just...

high-quality, reliable sources. The sources you mentioned do not meet WP:NBASIC, which requires that people are presumed notable only if they have received...

Sufficient volume of coverage in reliable sources to at least pass WP:NBASIC. —Alalch E. 23:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) Keep. Significant non-primary coverage...

won't be the last. Ajf773 (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2025 (UTC) Keep. WP:NBASIC is clearly met. Even if no single thing that Arps has done (sharing the...

Despite winning Britain's Got Talent, I'm not sure Venn is notable per WP:NBASIC or WP:ANYBIO. They definitely don't pass WP:ENT. The current sources don't...

(talk) 20:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Keep. The individual passes WP:SIGCOV/WP:NBASIC as having been the subject of significant coverage multiple independent...

2025 (UTC) Weak Keep. I think the coverage we have is just enough for GNG/NBASIC given the circumstances; I feel like if we did better searches we'd find...

16:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC) Weak Keep, we probably have enough to write an NBASIC-compliant article, and the Rank and File is sufficient for SPORTCRIT. BeanieFan11...

2023 (UTC) Redirect to Hololive Production until it becomes clear that WP:NBASIC is met. Any future recreation, however, will need to tone down on the primary...

2023 for notability, lacks SIGCOV in independent sources, does not meet NBASIC or NPOLITICIAN.Current sourcing in the article is primarily to bylines and...

reliable, specific, secondary sources are still required to establish WP:NBASIC here. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Click on your own JSTOR...

in NBIO or WP:N, to delete or merge articles that do not meet the GNG/NBASIC: this is one of the urban legends of Wikipedia. And setting Time Lords aside...

activism in helping Ukrainian hospitals and patients. Clearly passes WP:NBASIC: multiple independent sources covering multiple aspects of her activism...

referring to the subject in his own right, of the kind that would meet WP:NBASIC. Also, this person is a minor nineteenth-century criminal; merely being...

notability. It's not the most clear cut, but this can pass a generous read of WP:NBASIC. Some of the interviews are pretty fluffy and not much use, but there should...

coverage of this subject. At the very least, there is enough to meet WP:NBASIC. Let'srun (talk) 20:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

which is in-depth coverage of Ecker; given this, I believe he meets WP:NBASIC, so I vote keep. Hatman31 (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Relisted to...

mentioned in several reliable third-party publications and may meet WP:NBASIC if deeper search is performed. Mekomo (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC) Being...

to have attracted any kind of coverage that would suggest they pass WP:NBASIC. Doing a bit of searching around turns up a fair few results from Warhammer...