ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:NFILMWP:NFILM WP:NFWP:NF...

Reporting statistics of link heritage.nf.ca; 0 records. heritage.nf.ca: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...

NF Magazine is a bi-monthly magazine that centers upon various Nintendo products such as the Wii U, Nintendo 3DS, Wii, and Nintendo DS....

sci-hub.it.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...

Reporting statistics of link iaindustrie.fr.nf; 0 records. iaindustrie.fr.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr •...

Reporting statistics of link gaygrancanaria.es.nf; 0 records. gaygrancanaria.es.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr...

sci-hub.ar.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...

Link is not on the whitelist. Link is not on the monitor list. schylaske.co.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr •...

bestdeal.in.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...

123moviesworld.free.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...

This case was moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sundae1970 from Yasmin NF (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there....

revids of this page may contain data pertaining other additions. koktel.biz.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr •...

Reporting statistics of link nn.nf; 0 records. nn.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits...

JavierNF (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki ·...

xpatcat.co.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...

acnenomoresystem.co.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...

Link is not on the whitelist. Link is not on the monitor list. schylaske.co.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr •...

was delete. — ξxplicit 02:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC) User:Jacchigua/Sandbox/NF-κB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:STALEDRAFT since 2010...

encouraged to look to subject-specific notability guidelines (SNGs) such as WP:NF to see if an article's assertions are at least verifiable in reliable sources...

page. The result was delete both.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC) N.F. Houck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...

just meet WP:NF [1] [2] [3]. Will see what can be done and report back. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NF clearly on...

nf" (282, 32855, 0, 0) www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=688760599&ref=nf" (282, 32855, 0, 0) www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1094612891&ref=nf" (282...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable student film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 03:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Keep. I removed the initial tag for...

(diff - undo) - Link: www.hm-walks.co.uk/walks_nf.htm. * Links added in this diff: www.hm-walks.co.uk/walks_nf.htm (20, 19, 19, 1) 2010-03-17 22:25:33 (UTC):...

does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 12:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC) Keep - 1) Not sure this is a "film," and therefore not even sure WP:NF applies. On the other...

asserted, fails Wikipedia:NF. Tryptofeng (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Delete Non notable film, agree fails Wikipedia:NF. Paste Talk 18:08, 6 January...

substantially more convincing than the others. MQS comments that it meets WP:NF with no discussion of why or how. Tokyogirl79 and Frmorrison reference the...

Delete unnotable film spammed here by the film's "producer". Fails WP:N and WP:NF. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Note: This...

unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Keep The cast alone means that it meets WP:NF. The nom should take a look...

article that makes it in the WaPo or NYT does not need a Wikipedia entry. nf utvol (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2026 (UTC) Redirect to Swatting#2020 Tennessee...

WP:NF and received a long review in The Jakarta Post. Appears to have been made by notable filmmakers and actors. By the rationale in note 7 to WP:NF, should...

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

JSTOR · TWL) Film does not have stand-alone notability, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 16:36, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Keep- The film is notable as of references...

account of the NF based on considerable fieldwork and interviews with members. Although Walker was not himself sympathetic to the NF, his book is actually...

reliable sources. It currently fails WP:NF. SCHMIDT, Michael Q. 20:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC) Delete: It fails WP:NF with no significant coverage. SL93 (talk)...

has lasting articles on de and fr Wikipedia is evidence of this. $nf->{'user'}; $nf->{'talk'}; 21:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC) The 1st link is a blog, albeit...

(View log) Delete NN fanfilm. Fails to meet notability requirements of WP:NF. Previous PROD was contested on the grounds that Terry Pratchett appears in...

own field. I have been updating NF-related pages and I find that my edits go unchallenged, which worries me. Here are NF-related pages that I have edited...

views) – (View log) It is unclear why this film passes the standards of WP:NF. PROD was removed without comment. -- Sent here as part of the Notability...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NF have it. ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 13:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC) I-59 South...

2015 (UTC) Delete Despite the sources found this article does not meet WP:NF, the sources found only give trivial litle blurbs with no significant coverage...

Non-notable film, no significant independent coverage from reliable sources, per WP:NF, deproded without addressing concerns BOVINEBOY2008 11:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no significant coverage for this film. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 15:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NF. No awards or substantial coverage. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)...

meets WP:NF and WP:GNG. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Comment: Could you be more specific in how the subject now meets WP:NF? I agree that...

block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Yasmin NF (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...

com/movies/177590/Trans Delete: Per Niteshift36 and Drawn Some. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC) http://www.villagevoice...

is trivial mentions. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Delete without prejudice as failing WP:NF. This short film screened at festivals...

not really amount to worldwide distribution as this might be intended by WP:NF to refer to the theatrical release. If those concerns cannot be addressed...

locatetv and other sites like it, a BBC site, and a program guide. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC) The film has over 200 hits in...

were posted, and the keep !vote demonstrates the topic's notability per WP:NF. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 06:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Orphaned article on a non-notable short film, fails WP:NF and WP:GNG. Created by Studio108 (talk · contribs) on two edits, the user...

JSTOR · TWL) A contested WP:PROD. This article fails all the criteria at WP:NF. It has a page at Rotten Tomatoes, but apparently there are no significant...

Delete - Per WP:NF. The article does not show or demonstrate any nobility. It also contains a source that directly conflicts with WP:NF ("Examples of coverage...

2008 (UTC) Delete (Retracted previous Keep vote) nf utvol (talk) 03:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC) nf utvol is the article creator and only contributor...

to this page.‎ The result was Delete Checking through the page history for NF, there does appear to be a consensus for the current standard on proposed...

does not meet WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 11:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. Deb (talk) 10:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:NF. No evidence of notability...

links. No significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Fails WP:NF and WP:N. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Strong...

no proof that the film meets notability criteria #1, #2, #4 and #5 of WP:NF. The article does state that the film has won an award from American Society...

television film, does not have significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Keep per meeting WP:NF through coverage in independent sources. Yes, the article as first nominated...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no coverage that would make this pass WP:NF. Non-notable film. SL93 (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Comment: I did...

film, no notable secondary coverage, only blog mentions, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 00:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC) I think this is significant in the...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Appears to fail WP:NF - future film that has not commenced principal photography. ukexpat (talk)...

Non-notable student film uploaded on YouTube. No indication of meeting WP:NF nor WP:N, unable to locate any independent third party reliable sources about...

sections you talk about the NF in the past tense as well as the present: "The National Front is a British Nationalist party" but "NF members typically referred...

November 2014 (UTC) Delete for a short while per a current failure of WP:NF. I gave the article some needed teaks, so when notability is finally established...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Film that I do not think meet WP:NF. There was something in the local paper about it[1], and reviews on speciailist...

significant coverage for this film. Two of the actors are notable, but WP:NF says "The film features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, asserts no notability, and has no references. Girolamo Savonarola 03:10,...

05:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Also, NF gives rough guidelines that are intended to be used, which does not mean that "NF is the standard to be used". Bigger...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to meet either WP:GNG or the specific WP:NF guideline. — Dædαlus Contribs 02:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Keep. Rotten Tomatoes...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacking notability, fails WP:V, all the news coverage are NF-Board statistics. Hammersfan (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Note: This...

to the article, this has only been shown in private screenings. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 02:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No significant coverage per WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 08:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found nothing to show notability. This film fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

TWL) This documentary film does not appear to meet notability through WP:NF (or general notability). It seems to fail prong 1 because, as the article...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable television film, no significant coverage, per WP:NF and WP:GNG BOVINEBOY2008 09:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

be a suitable article topic"). These items work together to establish WP:NF ("Claims of notability must adhere to Wikipedia's policy on Verifiability;...

should be made to this page. The result was Withdrawn (non-admin closure)‎. nf utvol (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

2007 (UTC) Keep, the Somaliland national football team is a full member of NF-Board and they have played a noteworthy match. This is an African Football...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Lacking notability, fails WP:V, all the news coverage are NF-Board statistics. Hammersfan, 04/10/09 19.54 BST Note: This discussion has...

(talk) 01:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Strong Keep, obviously notable and meets WP:NF. Well discussed in numerous news sources that were easily found in a quick...

back one it meets WP:NF. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk)...

North America1000 17:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Delete: Yes, it fails WP:NF and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 02:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

TWL) I found no significant coverage for this direct-to-video film. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 18:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

This page is for WP:AWB developers to test RETF-related stuff. <Typo word="fuckfuckfuck" find="nf" replace="nF" />...

blockbuster... it meets WP:NF by having screened in a festival 5 years after initial release,[1] and has coverage.... just enough to pass WP:NF, even if stubby....

for "A Date with Fear" and "Asit Kaul" brings up just four hits. Fails WP:NF; prod removed without explanation. PC78 (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NF OlEnglish (Talk) 11:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

@Clarityfiend that discusses the topic as a grouping. (non-admin closure) nf utvol (talk) 02:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

do it. Fails WP:NF without a blink. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 13:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Delete as above, doesn't even hint at passing NF at this point. Skier...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no significant coverage for this film. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 03:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(UTC) Comment Nomination is not among the criteria for notability set in WP:NF. 舎利弗 (talk) 18:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Weak delete Weak keep - I suspect this...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no coverage. Not even a single review. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

notability guidelines per WP:NF. Girolamo Savonarola 20:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Delete Unable to find any relevant Ghits to support WP:NF notability. NO IMDB...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unnotable film. Fails WP:NF. Prodded by one editor with note of "no evidence of notability - not even...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Comment. There's a snippet...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG & WP:NF. Only source listed or found on a web search is IMDB, which is not sufficient...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF Girolamo Savonarola 02:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. A movie that has...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable porn film fails WP:NF. No award wins, no RS. Pax 05:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Not notable, independent film with absolutely no third-party coverage. WP:NF and WP:GNG. BOVINEBOY2008 22:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Delete - No coverage...

references listed and none to be found, a non notable film that fails WP:NF. Paste Let’s have a chat. 09:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

The only sources that I can find for this movie is this and this. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC) I am currently looking for other...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found nothing to show notability. This film fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 01:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Delete. There are no reviews, no news...

Qwghlm 00:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Comment, being an associate member of the NF-Board (see here) is, in my eyes, some sort of claim of notability, but I am...

met WP:NF. If an editor wishes it userfied to them for possible improvements, they need only ask and show me the additional sources that meet WP:NF. Schmidt...

AFD is here. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 01:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: no significant independent 3rd party notability WP:NF. JamesBurns (talk) 05:40...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC) Solid Keep. Topic meets WP:NF as being a completed film that has been the subject of multiple articles before...

coverage to meet WP:NF it's return might be considered. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Delete - far short of meeting WP:NF. May become notable...

archived by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 7 August 2024 [1]. Nominator(s): nf utvol (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC) This article is about a rural, sparsely...

future film notability per WP:NF. Girolamo Savonarola 20:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Delete No 3rd party references to support WP:NF, no IMDB or AMG listing....

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film (WP:NF). Evil saltine (talk) 06:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC) Delete per above. I'm actually...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to meet WP:NF and has no references. The article is currently just a plot synopsis. Sunmist3...

template. Its text is the same WP:NFCC-1. All NF-images must comply with it. All NF-license tags allude to it. All NF-rationables must point to this apect. For...

(talk) 14:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Merge or Redirect to Tim Asch. Per WP:NF, "An article on the film should be created only if there is enough information...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, unreferenced, does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 05:49, 20 October...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:NF, all coverage is just reproduction of the same press release, no independent...

University, creating a new section "Presidents." nf utvol (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2025 (UTC) Withdrawn by nom. nf utvol (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2025 (UTC) Note:...

Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC) Delete per failing WP:NF. Should not be confused with the other Django a Japanese short film of 2014...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

no record this film was officially released in theaters anywhere. Fails WP:NF. Also note that the name of the user who created this article is the same...

Delete: although I've done some work to the article, it still doesn't meet WP:NF or WP:PORNBIO. Thine Antique Pen 19:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Delete. The only...

de/pt/2007/11/02/a0091.nf/text taz.de/. 2007-12-16 06:05:28: User en:84.191.55.155 (talk - contribs) to en:Polyamory (diff). Links: www.taz.de/pt/2007/11/02/a0091.nf/text...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not as per WP:N and WP:NF - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 12:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC) This AfD nomination...

reviews. But as it stands, it misses out on WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)...

required by criterion #3 of WP:NF. Other than the awards won at the non-notable festival, the film fails all other NF criteria. I have also been unable...

(View log) Fails WP:NF, asserts no notability, and has no references. Girolamo Savonarola 03:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NF and WP:N. If the...

as members of the NF board, is that they are non-notable, but the fact that they ARE recognised by an affiliation (in this case, NF-Board means they should...

meeting WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Delete per the above; I cannot find sources to show that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NF.  Gong show...

Fhofrdhrag pbzzragf fubhyq or znqr ba gur nccebcevngr qvfphffvba cntr (fhpu nf gur negvpyr'f gnyx cntr be va n qryrgvba erivrj). Ab shegure rqvgf fubhyq...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable small independent film. Does not meet WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 16:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

15:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep as just barely, barely meeting WP:NF. I will myself have a hand at removing author's COI, POV and ADVERT to bring...

Near You. Girolamo Savonarola 23:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NF and WP:CRYSTAL. Even IMDb, which I do not suggest relying upon, identifies...

Pine (film) and Cold Glass. No sources, nothing in Google or IMDb; fails WP:NF. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF, WP:TOOSOON. PROD tag was removed. No RS were found. Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 08:33...

log) Delete NN unreleased film per WP:NF Mayalld (talk) 11:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom under WP:NF. I tried to access the website from the...

films by and starring unknowns. We can allow a return only when and if WP:NF can be met. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NF_(rapper)&diff=880059375&oldid=880054846 68: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NF_%28rapper%29&type=revision&d...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Delete. WP:NF is failed and this has no coverage to overcome WP:NFF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q...

notable film critic, feels the film is notable. However, both GNG and WP:NF make clear that more than one film critic writing in depth on the film is...

that said that the film won an award, but it didn't say what award. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. No RS. Pax 05:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet WP:NF, can't be attributed to reliable sources. NasssaNser 04:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)...

Non-notable television film, does not have significant coverage, does not meet WP:NF nor WP:GNG BOVINEBOY2008 20:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Delete per failing WP:NF. The film apparently exists, and may have won an award... but failed to receive...

page. The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ nf utvol (talk) 12:50, 30 September 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

Qwghlm 00:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Comment, being an associate member of the NF-Board (see here) is, in my eyes, some sort of claim of notability, but I am...

after this review on what I will do with them. But as of now, this fails WP:NF. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 20:38, 21 July...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete as failing WP:NF. Had there been an article on the award-winning young director, I might have...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per WP:NF -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC) (As Nominator)...

this film. The only source in the article is the official website. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:N and WP:NF, violates WP:BALL, and to conclude it's existence on Wikipedia constitutes...

Delete. Lacking any sort of reliable coverage, this youtube video fails WP:NF. As the film lacks any notability, we might at best consider a redirect to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF — Abhishek  Talk 06:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

TWL) Does not assert the importance of the topic, does not appear to meet WP:NF. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 22:30, 15 April 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(appears unreliable) and the second review is an unreliable source. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, no WP:SIGCOV, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 13:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

coverage and the only review in the article is to an unreliable source. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 02:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Declined PROD. Fails WP:NF. Basically a student film that has been entered in a YouTube festival, but...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, no independent coverage, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

deletion discussions. sst✈ 05:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC) Keep per meeting WP:NF. While authorship is a concern, the film topic is notable none-the-less and...

--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Strong Keep per topic meeting WP:NF. Very poor WP:BEFORE accompanied with a nomination statement easily disproved...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF, no other indication of notability by WP:NFO BOVINEBOY2008 15:28, 4 September...

Allmovie does not confer notability, and IMDB is user-edited. Film fails WP:NF and WP:N. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Keep...

deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 16:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NF. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 16:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC) (Find sources: Google (books ·...

Sources that I found were sites like IMDB, user reviews, and torrents. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. Only 78 votes on IMDb EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)...

discussions. North America1000 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NF and THEN redirect title to Robin Bain#Filmography as the one place where it...

soon. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:14, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Delete Clear failure of WP:NF fuzzy510 (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

deserve its own article" kind of make this AFD a little confusing. WP:NF is WP:NF. Just sayin'. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC) Keep and...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no notability per WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Delete Fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC) Delete without prejudice toward recreation if/when film meets WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL...

the only link provided is self published by someone who is a member of the NF-Board (the association who claims this non-team as a member). This link mentions...

timed 13:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Delete - this film fails WP:NF in every way.--90.0.130.131 (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Note: This...

discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NF —Mike Allen 08:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:TOOSOON... waaaay too...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete for failing WP:NF. What also needs addressing is Author's user page is identical to the article...

WP:NF is met. Y Schmidt, Michael Q. 15:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC) And as the topic is notable but the contributor apparently misunderstands WP:NF and...

TWL) Non-notable film, no secondary independent coverage, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 00:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

15 July 2013 (UTC) I don't see it meet any criteria of WP:NF.There is no IMDB listing in WP:NF.I think just listing in IMDB is not sufficient.After a web...

to find sources". Following the guideline of WP:NF, I found "the required sources"... meeting WP:NF, WP:GNG, and thus WP:N. Thank you. MichaelQSchmidt...

Delete Fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC) Delete without prejudice toward recreation if film can meet WP:NF after its release...

TWL) Non-notable film, does not have significant coverage, does not meet WP:NF or WP:GNG BOVINEBOY2008 01:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

meet WP:NF. Sorry Versace1608... we look to WP:NFF only if a film is completed and not yet released. Allow undeletion or recreation only when WP:NF can be...

be improved or that the film will achieve any actual notability. Fails WP:NF.   Will Beback  talk  01:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Delete In a word: "Yuck...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, no independent coverage, does not meet WP:NF, deproded with no explanation nor improvement BOVINEBOY2008 11:08, 27 April...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF and does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 04:09, 17 October 2007...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF FunkyCanute (talk) 23:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC) Delete. Fails notability standards...

discussions. North America1000 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NF and THEN redirect title to Robin Bain#Filmography as the one place where it...

in the reliable sources. Fails WP:NF. Not-to-be-confused with this one, Happy Journey, another movie, seems to pass NF and GNG as well ([1], [2], [3])....

crappy documentary, THAT has it meet WP:NF . Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Nope, doesn't. Read WP:NF#Other evidence of notability again....

—Mikemoral♪♫ 23:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Keep Minor children's film sure, but meets WP:NF in having screened in festivals and/or retrospectives more than five years...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Suspected WP:HOAX/WP:MADEUP/WP:NF – no ghits, no sources, no nuffink. matt (talk) 16:11, 25 September 2011 (UTC)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Comment: I'm having some...

are not "all NF Board statistics"; they have been taken from several different sources. In any case, why should statistics from the NF Board be discounted...

is a jurisdiction-specific value for that name. Note that the jurisdiction NF will produce the same results as NL. The abbreviation N-W is used for the...

after initial release." at WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC) Keep Per the above delete voter, passes WP:NF.Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:23, 12...

not seeing how this film is notable, gSearch are false positives. fails WP:NF. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

23 December 2009 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NF. Search finds nothing but articles about...

on Wikipolicy or participant consensus. Shortcut WP:SNOOKER/NFWP:SNOOKER/NF In some international professional and amateur competition, snooker players...

– Elisson • T • C • 14:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC) The article states : "The NF-Board seeks to work with FIFA to be a temporary organisation for football...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod was removed. This film fails WP:NF and is obviously self-promotion (look at the username of the page's creator)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnotable film, does not meet WP:NF. No information on production, no significant coverage in media. May be WP:TOOSOON...

20 February 2012 (UTC) I did not agree that it fails WP:GNG, anyways WP:NF "The film represents a unique accomplishment in cinema, is a milestone in...

through modified search parameters to find critical analysis enough to meet WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:25, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unnotable children's film. Fails WP:NF. Already deleted twice, but CSD was declined because it was speedied before...

immediately. - Mgm|(talk) 14:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Delete As failing WP:NF. I have just myself visited to article to remove WP:ADVERT, WP:COI, and WP:POV...

(How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 05:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NF. Really no reliable sources or information to back up this article. No prejudice...

proper notability per WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 16:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC) Article issues have now been addressed. In my opinion, WP:NF has been met. Schmidt...

2009 (UTC) Keep - NF team are very notable indeed. As it happens, they were meant to play in the 2006 Viva World Cup organised by the NF board, see this...

sources are not(all) being used, this Argentinian film appears to meet WP:NF. Though released in 1968, it apparently has Spanish-language (and some Italian-language)...

documentary film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources per WP:NF and WP:GNG BOVINEBOY2008 18:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Rana" "Nur Uddin Mollah" "Jiaul Hoque" "Habibur Islam" Delete for failing WP:NF. Assuming the thing exists and was released in Assam as asserted, I could...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Automated comment: This AfD was...

only on Forest Service materials; I don't know any specifics for Shoshone NF, but I know that there is serious debate in much of the West over whether...

coverage, much less any verifiability, in reliable sources and thus fails WP:NF. Interestingly, it is sourced to an official blogspot and something called...

JavierNF (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki ·...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, fails WP:NF. — Abhishek  Talk 02:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

it's a start. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Delete WP:NF fails and the sources are not reliables Hidzoko (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2014...

TWL) Non-notable film, no independent secondary coverage, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 10:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(UTC) Question - The last AFD resulted in a keep based upon a section of WP:NF that has since changed ("The film was successfully distributed domestically...

See [1]. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Delete; fails WP:NF. WegianWarrior (talk) 17:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

book coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NF per sources found and offered by Joe Chill. See WP:NRVE. While certainly a...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete: This article fails WP:NF, as it is not a notable film deserving of its own article. - The article is...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film per WP:NF, WP:Conflict of interest by creator (see http://www.myspace.com/lilkeefee)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete as failing both WP:NF and more importantly, WP:V. This thing may well exist, but finds mention only...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:GNG and WP:NF as no reliable sources show up on Google Search and news. Citrusbowler (talk)...

(when he he actually looked he would have found multiple sources to meet WP:NF through WP:GNG), 5. seems to be unaware of WP:NRVE's instruction that topic...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 11:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not Not as per WP:NF and WP:GNG - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 09:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC) Note:...

found in internet searches, that this film meets any of the criteria of WP:NF. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Delete - has no indication...

discussions. NorthAmerica1000 14:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NF among many others. When I was young these porn versions of mainstream films...

quandry. Looking to the applicable guideline, the film is weak on meeting WP:NF. But as it does speak toward the foundation and the project, we can have a...

only secondary source is a college newsletter article, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 13:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Keep per meeting WP:GNG and thus WP:NF. Wikipedia does not care if the film was a tax scam just so long as it gets...

the nomination steps explained in WP:AFD, and then spend time studying WP:NF and WP:DEL#REASON, as a film's controversial topic, it being released through...

coverage by independent sources or other indications of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 17:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

film has no coverage other than on commercial websites, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 17:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

to meet WP:NF or it does not. Let's just look and see. Schmidt, Michael Q. 01:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC) STRONG Keep per easily meeting WP:NF. I do not know...

Meets WP:NF. Brunei Times has a substantive article telling us that this is "Brunei's very first full-length movie to be shown in cinemas" Per WP:NF, THAT...

weak. Both keep votes mentioned NF Board teams as though they were all equal. As this team has never played in an NF Board competition I fail to see the...

faith media search, I do not find evidence that this film meets the GNG or NF. Bongomatic 14:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

TWL) Fails WP:NF; zero coverage outside Wikia. Blackguard 02:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Delete No significant third party coverage, fails NF. --Fauzan✆ talk✉...

did some research. My conclusion is that the topic does meet WP:GNG and WP:NF.[1][2] While yes, the article will benefit from being tagged for cleanup,...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no significant coverage per WP:NF. As a straight to video film in a country that is not well known for films...

can't find any reliable sources that show that this short film passes WP:NF. Iowateen (talk) 06:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

speedy delete. Per CSD#G7. Article's author has shown understanding of WP:NF and its requirement for WP:RS. With no sources outside of Facebook speaking...

Despite the article needing work (an addressable issue), this film meets WP:NF and WP:GNG. A little looking shows it reviewed in Film Threat [1] and production...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per failing WP:NF. It "may" be completed, but lacks enough coverage in reliable sources to meet...

One bat • One hammer) 19:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:V and WP:NF, especially WP:NFF - Rex92, you need to read those links, and WP:YFA. JohnCD...

of in Telegraph India and Hindustan Times but nowhere else. WP:GNG and WP:NF and WP:BIO are currently failed. If more coverage is forthcoming, a WP:REFUND...

not completely unsourcable,[1] this 45 second safety film does not meet WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

coverage in reliable sources, and in lacking such can be seen as failing WP:NF and simply being TOO SOON. Allow it back if standards are ever met. Schmidt...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Strong delete - Having read WP:NF, this film seems to fail notability guidelines. The film currently is not...

immediately recreated with copyvio removed, however, still fails notability per WP:NF and WP:GNG. Respectfully, Cindamuse (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG, WP:NF. joe deckertalk to me 14:56, 23 April 2012 (UTC) The Adelaide Question (edit |...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) WP:NF no RS for this film, only reference is dead link and i can not find any independent...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete for lacking the coverage to meet WP:NF. As it exists, it might be mentioned in articles on Burton Richardson, Ronnie...

Kambhampati Komal Jha Arjun Kalyaan Praveen Lakkaraju Keep per meeting WP:NF, even if only to India. And sorry DGG, awards are not needed to assure notability...

either lyrics or music for a notable composition". He has collaborated with NF in the composing of three very notable albums which peaked at #1, #7, and...

toward delete. DreamGuy (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC) !Vote changed to keep: I think...

2009 (UTC) Delete: The only source that I found for this is Amazon. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 04:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

in reliable sources for this short film. It appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NF.  Gongshow   talk 19:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

referenced in the article only contains passing mentions of the company. nf utvol (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

which, again, could be expected of any professor at a research university. nf utvol (talk) 17:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.skanelandsfotbollsforbund.com/2011/05/nf-board-press-release.html (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2011-06-24 19:46:12 (UTC): User...

for this film. No one that had a part in the film has an article. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC) KeepMerge/redirect...

article starter said that the film is obscure on the talk page. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF and WP:NPOV. Passes gng though. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC) Weak...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 09:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film has little to no secondary coverage, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 14:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete - IMDB isn't a reliable source...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnnotable film. Fails WP:NF and WP:N Prod removed by creator with statement that "it is notable" without...

Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC) Redirect to Nathan Phillips...

up previously). SuaveArt (talk) 04:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Keep – per WP:NF: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage...

February 2015 (UTC) Keep. Even if only through Italian language sources, WP:NF is met. Simply having "only one source" is not a proper deletion rationale...

production company, citations do not offer significant coverage of the film per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 22:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

other assertion of notability. Cannot see it meets any of the standards of WP:NF SeaphotoTalk 00:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC) Keep - Michael Q Schmidt has done...

NE-8 NE-9 NF0 NF1 NF2 NF3 NF4 NF5 NF6 NF7 NF8 NF9 | NF-0 NF-1 NF-2 NF-3 NF-4 NF-5 NF-6 NF-7 NF-8 NF-9 NG0 NG1 NG2 NG3 NG4 NG5 NG6 NG7 NG8 NG9 | NG-0 NG-1...

but would welcome any additional source locations and information. Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 13:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC) A quick comment: the major highways...

discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. nf utvol (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Keep – A reliable source is a reliable...

meeting WP:NF and WP:GNG. (See, even I won't try to save 'em all). Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Delete: per WP:CS and WP:NF. South Bay...

JSTOR · TWL) Deproded without explanation, non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 12:52, 20 September 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found nothing significant about this film. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

than qualifies under WP:GNG and thus WP:NF: Here are a few of the non-trivial, in-depth reviews that show, per WP:NF, "significant coverage in reliable sources...

ANYTHING about this film in any reliable source. Allow back only if/when WP:NF is met. Article content currently supported only by its Official website and...

a press release. Brought to AFD after redirect to Shoe Show was reverted. nf utvol (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

that it's been mentioned, a redirect to Moland House would be a good ATD. nf utvol (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Film that does not come close to meeting WP:NF or GNG. --Non-Dropframe talk 01:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Delete-as well as a...

deletion aside from the nominator but I'm afraid the nominator is right about WP:NF. It could be argued that by being screened at a notable festival counts as...

Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC) STRONG keep Easily meets WP:GNG and WP:NF. Apparently the nominator judged the current article (yes, needs cleanup and...

establish notability UltraMagnusspeak 11:39, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Per WP:NF, IMDB can't be used as evidence of a film's notability. A Quest For Knowledge...

scores, or routine announcements. Bringing to AFD after it was de-PROD'd. nf utvol (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

continue working on the article... as it now tickles the requirements of WP:NF and I have more to add. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 13:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Update...

covering this which is odd for a movie with "critical acclaim". Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 21:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

• Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Keep per just meeting WP:NF. Sorry Dougweller, among those "50" were Dread Central and Twitch Film......

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Delete per failure of WP:NF and WP:V. I just cleaned up a bunch of bluelinks that led to the wrong articles...

coverage to meet both the cautions of WP:NFF and the coverage required by WP:NF. Flat-out deletion of a completed Lifetime film does not serve the project...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnnotable film. Fails WP:NF and WP:N Prod removed by creator with statement that "it is notable" without...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) per WP:NF, lacking significant coverage by independent reliable sources, reviews cited...

attention of the press or media... but this one did not, and so it fails WP:NF. Failing NF is not and should not be a CSD criteria, but rather simply a reason...

fail WP:GNG and WP:NF.  Gong show 09:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC) Delete While this short film exists, a lack of coverage fails WP:NF. I might have suggested...

Reporting statistics of link a.nf; 0 records. a.nf: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits...

The result was Keep. Consensus is that coverage that exists satisfies WP:NF. Michig (talk) 07:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...

wikt:de:Schn�nf (diff - DELETED) - Link: schnuenf.de (R/Xmeta/L) 1970-01-01 00:00:00 (UTC): wikt:de:User:Klermo (t - c; 8) to wikt:de:Schn�nf (diff - DELETED)...

author. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NF, WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Google shows no apparent signs of notability: [1]. — Rankiri...

of the source material"... multiples that appear to meet WP:NF#General principles and WP:NF#Other evidence of notability. I believe it can be improved...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. No reliable coverage and no sources since creation. ElectricBurst(Electron...

I have concluded after my work that this film does meet notability per WP:NF#General principles in that it is verifiable as being part of the curricula...

August 2010 (UTC) Delete. It doesn't satisfy any of the guidelines in WP:NF. Zero reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. "Direct-to-video"[1] = major release? Clarityfiend...

Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Vote changed to keep: Passes WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 13:34, 31 December...

TalkQu 10:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC) Delete for being premature and failing WP:NF. And an aside to User:QuiteUnusual, the article is not so "exclusively promotional"...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod contested. Not as per WP:NF - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 12:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 02:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Commment: If anyone is curious, the...

failing WP:NF. Sorry 19jduryea (filmmaker Joe Duryea with WP:COI?), but existence is not notability. Please go read WP:NAU and then visit WP:NF, WP:RS and...

face-lift but this short film simply does not have the coverage to meet WP:NF. If that ever changes, it can always be resurrected. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:49...

it fails WP:V from your nomination. And note, for a 1935 film to meet WP:NF, the GNG is not the mandate. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)...

content is a collection of material that could be listed elsewhere (List of NF Board members or Football at the Island Games) - it's unclear what gives it...

Propose renaming Category:NF-Board football teams to Category:N.F.-Board football teams or Category:N.F.-Board teams Category:African NF-Board football teams...

blogs, or things unrelated to this film, and as such it appears to fail WP:NF. Unscented (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

JavierNF (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki ·...

name and offer no substantial coverage. No evidence that this film meets WP:NF. PC78 (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

taedwards/maeprevious/1988awardwinner.htm (33, 2, 1, 0) www.penguin.co.uk/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,9780141326696,00.html?strSrchSql=wuthering/Wuthering_...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) STRONG Keep per easily meeting WP:NF. Gene93k is eminently correct. Come on Finngall, L235, and Arjayay The nominator...

links are all dead links. I couldn't find any significant coverage. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 04:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Deadlinks have been addressed. Schmidt...

views) (delete) – (View log) All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

film distribution/promotion. No Major Film Awards either. Not saifisfyng WP:NF as a whole.Dixiku (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

that is an incorrect interpretation. Your "quote" is from a subsection of WP:NF, from part of a list that follows this statement: "The following are attributes...

Malik M. Hussain Swati Umar Daraz Tariq Jamal Delete per currently failing WP:NF. While the film seemsto exist and some of its purported cast and crew can...

Nailed (film) The Thomas Crown Affair 2 (film article that does not meet WP:NF criteria) Town House White Jazz (film) (redirected) Zack and Mira Make a Porno...

(European or not, major or not) it is finally getting the coverage to meet WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC) What awards? What coverage?...

short of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NF.  Gong show 20:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Delete: There is no significant coverage. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 22:55, 7 July 2013...

(UTC) Delete. Nothing seems to have changed since the last deletion. The N.F.-Board lists them and as having played friendly matches, but that does not...

The result was delete. Keep voters unable to show that the criteria of WP:NF are met. MrDirector may have a COI and should be advised to comment, not vote...

The film company exists but fails WP:CORP. The film exists but fails WP:NF. The filmaker and his brother exist but fail WP:BASIC. Clean sweep. Schmidt...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NF. Not only hasn't been commercially released, it apparently hasn't even been...

highly doubt that it is a notable part of their careers. This film fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Keep A movie starring George...

(UTC) Delete. I'm unable to find evidence that this film meets WP:GNG or WP:NF.  Gong show 08:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Delete No evidence of notability. --Dweller...

excellent article about this documentary in Variety and am now convinced that WP:NF is met... even if only just. Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)...

JavierNF (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki ·...

msg me 02:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Delete per being TOO SOON and failing WP:NF. Apparently done as an homage to A Nightmare on Elm Street, it lacks sources...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Keep Nothing special...

film seems to have not garnered any WP:RS that would indicate it meets WP:NF. All I can find are mentions in online forums and such. The film's official...

film, I found only one weak source. Let it come back if/when it can meet WP:NF. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC) Delete Not notable  Chzz  ► ...

might be notable: through it meeting the criteria of WP:GNG and that of WP:NF. While yes, as Cameron's first film, it meets the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability...

links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) No evidence this meets WP:NF, specifically the awards and nominations are not close to meeting #3 "The...

discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NF by being Eric Red's very first film,[1][2] made while he was a student at...

for example. It can be spoken of in the K3 article, but meeting WP:NF is meeting NF, and lacking citations is a reason to add them... not to delete because...

received coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails NF, no significant coverage. - - MrBill3 (talk)...

short film. The article is currently referenced to a press release. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

Kauffman.Dkkicks (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Delete doesn't meet WP:NF criteria, as is stated in the article itself. Teleomatic (talk) 16:23, 12...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. Not a notable film. Only 271 ratings on IMDb and average rating of 4.7/10...

websites linked do not appear, however, to lend notability. (non-admin closure) nf utvol (talk) 20:57, 4 January 2026 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...

that this review was reliable, but it's a self-published website. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

zero coverage in reliable sources; fails the Reliable sources section of WP:NF. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

September 2008 (UTC) Comment: the article now does address the criteria of WP:NF, as assertions of notability have well sourced. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:12...

removed the advert feel of the synopsis. Its just tickling the bar of WP:NF.... just. I have tagged it for WP:RESCUE. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:38, 5 January...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no significant coverage that would make it pass WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

. reviews ARE the expected "persuasive sources for retention" to meet WP:NF. Even with this bit of dreck having coverage in lots of unreliable sources...

does not have significant coverage by independent, reliable sources per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 12:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(talk) 20:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Delete -It simply fails WP:GNG and WP:NF. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC) Delete posting a 5-1/2...

with no references and no independent coverage in reliable sources, per WP:NF and WP:GNG. Not to be confused with Closet Space, an unrelated film. Pianoman320...

mention of this film—nothing remotely rising to the standards of WP:N or NF. Bongomatic 04:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) STRONG Keep per meeting WP:NF... even if most of the many available sources are non-English. IE: [1], [2]...

impartial observer; Seems to be non-notable, references are IMDB (see WP:NF) and local media. "Cultural References" is reading like a long Trivia section...

multiple independent sources offering more-than-trivial information to meet WP:NF. I note that while often preferred, WP:SUBSTANTIAL coverage is not a mandate...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF and does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 03:41, 17 October 2007...

the article is a dead link and I found zero significant coverage. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Delete - A no-budget, unimportant...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF. Girolamo Savonarola 03:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom; no indication...

significant coverage from independent sources, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(delete) – (View log) Non-notable short film that does not appear to meet WP:NF standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete copyvio...

indications his autobiography has sufficient notability to generate an article. nf utvol (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

with actor or citations about the actor/not about the film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 15:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NFILM. Rubbish...

mention here. Otterathome (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC) Keep per meeting WP:NF. To the nominator... other eyes.. other google foo. Your "mention" and two...

expected numbers of matches for users of these genders equal nf × pf and nm × pm, in which nf and nm stand for the numbers of candidates presented to the...

(talk) 18:18, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Redirect to Antonov An-26#2000s as an ATD. nf utvol (talk) 07:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC) Redirect per Nfutvol; at least this...

find enough independent reliable sources to suggest that the film meets WP:NF or that Makonnen meets WP:CREATIVE. (Searches for the film are confused by...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Keep as meeting WP:NF#Other evidence of notability and further expand and source this piece of cinematic...

independent coverage, only sources available are database sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 11:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete nn film per WP:NF Mayalld (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per above. Reads kind of...

enough on the song. Propose delete and merge with The Good Witch (album). nf utvol (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(WP:NOTINHERITED). Article could be largely merged with Jackson, Tennessee. nf utvol (talk) 18:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

authentication credentials. --nenolod (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC) rofl. $nf->{'user'}; $nf->{'talk'}; 00:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC) This is a bullshit case, albeit...

sources (although the film's title certainly makes the search harder). Fails WP:NF. --Non-Dropframe talk 03:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC) I've heard that Horror Society...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Keep per just meeting WP:NF. I note that sources are available, even if not being used as citations. No...

WP:NF: "...a generally accepted standard that editors should follow, though it should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception." WP:NF states...

addition, Matilda Gyllenhaal has an entry in both NF and SBH, and Lars Herman is also listed in NF - ([1] and [2]). --bonadea contributions talk 10:00...

"Pronil Halder", studio Artwood Delete this brand new article per failing WP:NF. While Art Wood studio may have some limited notability, this film does not...

adult-themed sexploitation film by Joseph W. Sarno as just meeting WP:GNG and WP:NF. Was really quite easy to find authored reviews at DVD Verdict. 10k Bullets...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NF. Context, or lack therof, is not a reason for deletion. First Huon's reasoning...

establishes notability. serialrage@ 07:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NF. I am not opposed to moving the article to Aquila92's user space to give him...

User:Jonathonarnold, we have a meeting of WP:NF. Growing commentary and review in reliable sources is what we have and it's enough, as WP:NF does not demand world-wide...

by kids just having fun." Contested PROD. No sources, none found. Fails WP:NF. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

discussions. —Tim Pierce (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Strong Keep. Meets WP:NF for its genre. A film need not have wide theatrical release to be found notable...

found on Google news, Google books, NewsBank and HighBeam. Seems to fail WP:NF notability guidelines. - MrX 13:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Delete - The only...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable television film, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 17:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, unreferenced, no notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola 21:48, 20 October...

nominator. Web and news searches do not turn up anything that'd help satisfy WP:NF. LeaveSleaves 19:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

released on Friday and it could always have been nominated if it did not meet WP:NF after release. Why the rush to delete something that could be suitable in...

national distribution, which is a key factor in WP:NF. The problem is the degree of coverage. WP:NF asks for at least two reviews, but as I noted, that...

04:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Delete: I found no significant coverage per WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 01:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

nom. Quick search turns up only brief mentions or non-independent sources. nf utvol (talk) 07:49, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Keep I realized that the citations...

Pratyush (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC) Delete: it appears to be failing WP:NF. Anup [Talk] 21:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete NN film per WP:NF Mayalld (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Delete Nothing from the article...

delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete NN film per WP:NF Mayalld (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Delete. Totally non-notable. —...

this Spanish-language film having the Spanish language coverage to meet WP:NF: El Dia, Canarias7, El Diario, Cabildo de Gran Canaria, La Voz, Creativa Canaria...

its components. Even the notability claimed for one short isn't up to WP:NF standards (no independent or in-depth cites, film-festival sounds important...

1964, Page 10, and Fri, Feb 05, 1965, Page 13) would contribute to WP:GNG. nf utvol (talk) 03:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC) WP:ANCESTRY Ell22Moore (talk)...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, no references. Girolamo Savonarola 06:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC) Delete, a...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 14:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was merge to N.F.-Board. causa sui (talk) 17:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC) South American Board...

19:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Keep: WP:NF: "Publication of at least two non-trivial articles...

(UTC) Comment Interesting problem. At what point do we disregard Wikipedia:NF#Other_evidence_of_notability #1? Do the Faroe Islands have a film industry...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Might not be notable as per WP:NF.  TOW  05:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...

guidelines. De-PROD'd due to article being recreated following a PROD in 2017. nf utvol (talk) 19:01, 1 April 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

WP:NF. Addressable issues are not a reason to delete. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Keep - the article is imperfect, but meets WP:NF as...

that comes close to WP:GNG is a obituary in Popular Astronomy from 1948. nf utvol (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator. Discovery of...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:14, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

is now officially the national team. It is not fully affiliated with the N.F.-Board yet. The best I can make of this is a case of WP:TOOSOON Martijn Hoekstra...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF. A quick google of the subject didn't result helpful. Anupmehra -Let's talk...

confined to the local press. Unfortunately, I still feel that none of WP:NF#General principles is satisfied. WP≠IMDB. Duja► 13:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)...

Darrenhusted (talk) 10:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Delete as unable currently to meet WP:NF. If this changes, allow the film back. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 06:05, 17 July...

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NF and WP:OR...Rameshnta909 (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 15:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

television film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF, good candidate as a redirect to an article about Lego Star Wars franchise...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article fails WP:NF. The only critical review I was able to find on this film was this one, and...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 20:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

with WP:V. --Rividian (talk) 21:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC) To go back to WP:NF: I see the review in Variety, but not "full-length reviews by two or more...

Vishwavijay (2016) No coverage, no reviews. No reliable sources. Fails WP:NF in all aspects. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Keep This film...

do with expansion/improvements but I'd say it was notable because of the NF membership. With regards to a rename it is worth pointing out that being a...

film, lacking significant coverage or other indication of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 18:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(history · last edit) from [4]. dab (𒁳) 13:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC) Deana Carter (history · last edit) from [5]. nf utvol 19:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)...

a redirection or a merge to a series article would be appropriate, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 00:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 21:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No significant coverage per WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 09:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC) Agree. Could only find 1 newspaper...

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 12:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

due diligence (sorry Мандичка) finds this topic has the coverage to meet WP:NF. IE: Daily Mail Metro UPI TMZ OC Weekly Fangoria (archive needs to be found)...

films. Jeffro77 (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom, fails WP:NF. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate...

added links, wikified, and sourced.. Long term notability per WP:GNG and WP:NF has been established. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC) The...

(View log) I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 07:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Delete: Complete rubish non-sense...

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage from reliable sources per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

coverage by independent sources or any other indication of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 17:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

relevant is WP:BEFORE to find (even if unused coverage) to show meeting WP:NF per WP:NEXIST. 11:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Schmidt, Michael Q. Relisted to...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 17:26, 23 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is unsourced and it fails WP:NF. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC) Comment. The play looks...

27 November 2011 (UTC) Delete: I found zero significant coverage. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 21:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete per failing WP:NF. Sadly, short films have it quite difficult, and this one has made no mark...

October 2010 (UTC) Delete no significant coverage and thus not notable by WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

glance as a mostly fluff page written by an acquaintance of the subject. nf utvol (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

news story. The linked articles don't go to the correct people. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 17:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Delete, Thought it was a hoax at first...

zombi". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC) Keep per meeting WP:NF, even with most of the coverage being non-English for this Spanish film. Original...

years after original release is an historic notability indicator under WP:NF#Other evidence of notability #2... KeralaTV confirms this 1992 film had commercial...

acts to ignore WP:NF and WP:SIGCOV. While appreciating his intentions, the nominator should understand that it is only when WP:NF and WP:GNG are failed...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable short film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 13:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

only reliable source with significant coverage that I can find. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 19:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC) Keep Three millions people watched...

keep it. - ColdNorthWind2 (talk) 02:38, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Keep. Per WP:NF. This film has received a major award and has received several full length...

Non-notable film, does not have significant third-party coverage, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC) We do also have the Theatrical Poster...

Non-notable film according to my search. Roger Corman rules, but this film fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 09:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

coverage by independent sources or other indications of notability, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

won't find a review of Sound of Music at Evildread or Horror Society. WP:NF is not just about big-budget, highly touted blockbusters. Reviews must be...

film, lacking significant coverage or other indications of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 16:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, unreferenced, does not assert notability. Girolamo Savonarola 06:13, 20 October...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 11:37, 8 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(View log) I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Note to closing admin: If WP:RESCUE...

18:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Delete per TOO SOON. The film exists, but fails WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Delete per above. I tried seeing...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnnotable film. Fails WP:NF and WP:N Prod removed by creator with statement that "it is notable" without...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, no references, no notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola 05:57, 20 October...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, unreferenced, no notability asserted Girolamo Savonarola 06:36, 20 October...

speaking about a planned film, but not enough to merit a separate article per WP:NF or WP:NFF, it is approprpriate to consider other places where sourced information...

(View log) I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Delete I can't find an entry on...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NF, WP:Verifiability. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 14:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC) Note:...

00:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Note - I have started a post relating to how WP:NF relates to fan films such as this at WT:FILM. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 20:38, 8 March...

is a member of Ananda Marga. NF mentions Criterion 3 (significant contribution to a significant religious movement), but NF merely lumps Criterion 3 together...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that the film meets NF & GNG, Closing as keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 00:00, 5 May 2016...

databases, fan sites, blogs, and other what appear to be self-published sites. nf utvol (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Fails WP:NF, does not assert notability, is unreferenced. Girolamo Savonarola 01:00, 19...

notable movie. Delete TheRingess (talk) 21:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NF. No awards, no significant coverage. —dustmite 02:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Delete...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 21:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film per WP:NFFWP:NF, only sources are reproductions of the primary source press release and non-professional...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable unreleased film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 15:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

film, lacking significant coverage or other indications of notability per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 18:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

translate of original Greek However, lack of coverage currently fails WP:NF. I'm fine with userfication to its author, and if/when this one ever gets...

available sources and is only modified by guideline. So please go re-read WP:NF to see the gross error of your assertion.Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:48, 12 December...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF, lacking any other indication of notability per WP:NFO BOVINEBOY2008 21:34...

the history in the unlikely scenario that any additional coverage surfaces. nf utvol (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2026 (UTC) SUPPORT - no brainer [to delete or...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 20:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(talk) 04:09, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Keep for the topic meets both WP:GNG and WP:NF. Why would th nom believe that a DVDd of two of J-Lo's live concerts woud...

for this is sites like IMDB and trivial mentions on Google Books. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 06:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I found no significant coverage per WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC) Delete. Nothing here clearly indicates...

notability. I can not. GtstrickyTalk or C 18:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC) See WP:NF - IMDb is specifically excluded from reliable sources. GregJackP (talk) 18:23...

discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NF. No doubt that it exists... but it has no sourcable notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL...

JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

(π, ν) 17:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Delete: No significant coverage per WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(UTC) Delete Supposedly having screened last month, this short film fails WP:NF. If the author wishes his new article placed in userspace for work on as sources...

independent sources, seems to only have some blog-style reviews online, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 23:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Delete a non-notable film.John Pack...