ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Non-free content is used in at least one article. Shortcut WP:NFCC8WP:NFCC8 Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would...

uploaded by Morgan695 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  This fails NFCC8 (reader understanding is hardly helped by "a humorous acknowledgement",...

| history | logs) - uploaded by Tlinsenm (notify | contribs). Fails WP:NFCC8 - does not add substantially to readers' understanding of Heist film Calliopejen1...

increase reader's knowledge and can be redirected to Qarabağ FK instead. Fails NFCC8 --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved as...

respective articles. And the use of 30 non-free files seems to violate WP:NFCC8 ----Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

I'll bring the food (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails NFCC8. In the article, the song itself, "Disciple", is only mentioned in reference...

George Ho (talk) 21:52, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete clear failure of WP:NFCC8; uploader seems to have been a repeat offender in this case and was blocked...

already have several other nonfree images of this individual, fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Image:Frank_Hawks_15.jpg...

copyrighted video used in segment about the video. Textbook example of meeting NFCC8 - any television programme, movie, music video and so on justifies a single...

"large" actually means passes NFCC8, since it "would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic" (NFCC8). That was why, generally...

talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Palm_dogg (notify | contribs). Fails NFCC8, is not described in article, purely decorative (and low quality) image...

uploaded by Moserjames79 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8, the list is informative enough. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:13, 16 April 2025...

my original comment from the user talk page: "I don't think it meets WP:NFCC8 even with the updated rationale. It's a textbook failure of Wikipedia:Non-free...

images in lists cannot be said to meet NFCC8. Stifle (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC) Delete Cleary fails NFCC8 because it adds no understanding to the...

not the subject of this article. Thus, the image fails WP:NFCC1 and WP:NFCC8 Joseph2302 (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

group. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 17:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - doesn't meet WP:NFCC8 on Evergreen Group - the Eva Air logo does not contribute significant insight...

additional significant amount of understanding of the person Laurie Simmons (WP:NFCC8). Consigned (talk) 11:44, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Delete multiple images of her...

marketing section is badly lacking and the image is unreferenced, thus failing nfcc8, as its omission would be detrimental to my understanding Fasach Nua (talk)...

already have several other nonfree images of this individual, fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC) Image:Frank_Hawks_15.jpg...

by CANthony0125 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails. WP:NFCC8, not primary topic --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC) Delete...

Man page, which is central and irreplacable to the topic) are deleted for NFCC8. Both images are side-note illustrations to the topics described that are...

uploads | upload log).  Specific image not discussed in article to meet NFCC8. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC) Comment - Previously discussed...

| uploads | upload log).  This is a soundtrack image which violates WP:NFCC8. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC) You could have deleted...

for its use on the article, it still has to meet all NFCC (especially WP:NFCC8). There are no RS provided which discuss this artwork; it is a purely decorative...

if the license is corrected to fair use, it fails WP:NFCC, specifically NFCC8. Aasim (話す（はなす）) 16:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved as an...

contribs | uploads | upload log).  Used in 4 articles but usage fails WP:NFCC8 as none of it is a primary topic and it's only used to indicate "Reserve...

trouble understanding the article without it. And that's what's required: NFCC8. ╟─TreasuryTag►fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale─╢ 14:26...

reduce ambiguity. — BQZip01 — talk 03:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Delete Fails NFCC8. This does not substantially increase readers' understanding of the topic...

contribs | uploads | upload log). Per GA review, this image does not meet WP:NFCC8. EditorE (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

uploaded by Appsoft4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8. Not primary topic at article and multiple free files are available. Arguably...

basis alone I am a delete !vote. I also question whether this meets WP:NFCC8—the medallions are never mentioned in the prose of National Book Award,...

Quadell (notify | contribs). violates WP:NFCC2 (recent AP photo), possibly WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC) Image:CarmineGalante.jpg...

Gregbard (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Does not meet WP:NFCC8 since it is a person pic used in a list instead of the associated bio. FoxyGrampa75...

second one doesn't significantly improve contextual understanding per WP:NFCC8. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)...

the top of the article dedicated to the work in question") and fails WP:NFCC8 – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails NFCC8, meaning fully conveyed by text. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:20, 14...

a terrible quality image which doesn't help understanding anyway. Fails NFCC8. Black Kite (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

executives meeting up. J Milburn (talk) 00:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  This image does not meet WP:NFCC8 "contextual significance" for the article The Mighty Boosh, about the comedy...

with a specific non-free-use rationale satisfy WP, particularly NFCC1 and NFCC8? Or is this use insufficiently significant, meaning that the photograph...

cutting the ice.jpg shows a similar ship operating in a similar way. WP:NFCC8 Contextual significance: Photo itself is doesn't convey a significant amount...

depicted. Based5290 :3 (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NFCC8. The image is essentially decorative; the prose makes no mention of the...

history | logs) - uploaded by Sarbazeirani (notify | contribs). fails WP:NFCC8 - not necessary to understand FreeRice Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:40, 10 September...

Chajeshukarie (notify | contribs). don't need the back cover of a single (NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Image:Vruci_dani_i_vre...

Pickmyusernameidc2022 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Seems to fail WP:NFCC8, does not increase readers knowledge about the topic. Probably the same...

this logo redundant - the logo isn't discussed in the article so fails WP:NFCC8, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...

that: The file will serve an important function in a particular article; (NFCC8)". The function of the file has been demonstrated. You have listed this...

uploaded by Sricsi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8, not necessary for context as one non-free cover is already included. estar8806...

image no longer represents the proposed design, and therefore may fail WP:NFCC8, contextual significance. – Wdchk (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC) The above...

copyrighted video used in segment about the video. Textbook example of meeting NFCC8 - any television programme, movie, music video and so on justifies a single...

free image (despite the uploader's tag) which I believe fails NFCC#1 and NFCC8. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

history | logs) - uploaded by VolatileChemical (notify | contribs). violates NFCC8 - readers can understand the NY Times perfectly well without this Calliopejen1...

uploaded by Jguiii (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Seems to fail NFCC8, not the primary subject of the article and doesn't really increase a reader's...

point which Future Perfect and myself are trying to make is that it fails NFCC8, because readers don't need a perfect mental image of the console in order...

of non-free content, fails WP:NFCC8, hence WP:WIAFA3 Fasach Nua (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC) It does not fail NFCC8 either, however I see you have...

standalone article. Usage does not increase reader's knowledge. Fails WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Frodet (notify | contribs). fails WP:NFCC8, totally nonsensical rationale Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2008...

--TheFEARgod (Ч) 15:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC) I agree w FN. It fails WP:NFCC8 (readers could understand the article perfectly well without this photo)...

talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Vijayr02 (notify | contribs). Fails NFCC8. Non-free rationale does not suffice for the inclusion of image in the article...

(talk) 02:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC) I specifically object to that part per NFCC8; the omission of this image would not be detrimental to the understanding...

history | logs) - uploaded by Plateofshrimp (notify | contribs). violates WP:NFCC8 - does not significantly add to readers' understanding Calliopejen1 (talk)...

screenshot from a TV cartoon series, not embedded in critical analysis, fails NFCC8 Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Image:US_regions.gif (delete...

Writereditor19 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Seems to fail WP:NFCC8, individual fair use logos available in respective articles, addition of...

deletion for files. According to CSD, a file that, for instance, violates NFCC8 does not merit speedy-deletion. (Although, according to NFCC, such a file...

clearly not the subject of sourced commentary. In short, the file violates WP:NFCC8# and WP:NFC#UUI, and should therefore be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:30, 19...

viewers' understanding of the article, and so fails both WP:NFCC1 and WP:NFCC8. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC) Delete: the stamp is clearly...

Haddaway in the "What Is Love" music video as "fail[ing] WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC8". The uploader de-prodded it, so I'm taking this to FFD here. First, (almost...

| contribs | uploads | upload log).  I don't think this image meets WP:NFCC8 - even though it's an interesting photo, its omission would not significantly...

uploaded by Mattrbrt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8. Fair use logo already available locally. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:52, 19 January...

characterization is in line with current practice, the policy should be modified.) NFCC8—agree that it is not valid in articles that aren't Pit of despair. But that...

this verbiage came from? Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC) Delete per NFCC8. Doesn't even remotely increase readers understanding if it's not even significant...

commentary, not required for understanding anything in the article. Fails NFCC8, as so often. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC) Delete (see below)...

case. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Keep, per my interpretation of NFCC8, one image that identifies the subject (that is, an image of a key moment...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete per NFCC8, or as a blatant infringement of fair use laws. This is an obvious violation...

Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NFCC8, doesn't add anything to understanding of topic. Rubbish computer (Talk:...

non-free image in the article, and the only image of the ballet. It passes NFCC8 as far as I can see. - SchroCat (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC) The above...

Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delete Violates NFCC2 and NFCC8. NFCC2 is a little bit iffy but I think still failing. The copyright holder...

uploaded by CLWE (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8 for context and understanding. The picture as it stands is a non-sequitur...

one of several symbols used by protesters. I don't think this meets WP:NFCC8. It could be replaced by File:2026 Zvërnec protests Tirana bulevard June...

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom (WP:NFCC8) and WP:NFCC1. There is no commentary in the article about the image's relevance...

Consensus indicates that a logo used on the article of its subject passes NFCC8. ViperSnake151 19:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Could you provide a reference...

don't ordinarily use news images without an extremely good reason) and WP:NFCC8 (readers can understand who wears a shirt without seeing a picture of it)...

be made to this section. The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails NFCC8. The text gives one line to the TV series this image was taken from. Image:LiveRayPalmer...

Non-free content is used in at least one article. Shortcut WP:NFCC8WP:NFCC8 Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would...

(talk) 20:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Removed from the sandbox. It does not fail NFCC8 in the list as the list includes an image of every unclassified X-Plane;...

does it meet NFCC 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Keep. NFCC8 states: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence...

years old and not on the national scene. None of the fair use pictures pass NFCC8 - they just show what she looks like. YellowMonkey (click here to choose...

September 2008 (UTC) Also let me add that if this is nonfree, it fails WP:NFCC8 and WP:NFCC1 - first of all, we don't need to have a photo of a sculpture...

history | logs) - uploaded by 172 (notify | contribs). AP photo, fails WP:NFCC8 (we could understand kennan w/o this photo perfectly well) Calliopejen1...

in 2018 and 2023 is not subject to sourced commentary. (so also fails WP:NFCC8 per WP:NFC#CS)" Uploader's contest summary was: "The reason there are two...

more explicit case should be made on the info page, and in relation to NFCC8 in the caption, which doesn't exist yet. What do you mean by this? The map...

talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cvene64 (notify | contribs). fails WP:NFCC8 - does not significantly increase readers' understanding of val kilmer Calliopejen1...

by PNG crusade bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). fails WP:NFCC8 -- no need to see a photo of the fire to understand that the building burned...

uploaded by Zeddawg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8. Don't see how this increases the understanding of the topic. A shirtless...

would be detrimental to [the] understanding [of the article topic]" (WP:NFCC8). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Just for...

log). non-free image (not created by the us govt as claimed), fails WP:NFCC8 bc it doesn't help the reader understand the company much Calliopejen1 (talk)...

editorial weight is not a compelling reason for the image in the sense of NFCC8. The only relevant factor here is whether it's needed for understanding...

—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails NFCC8 any which way. Stifle (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Delete, there are...

purpose it serves is not present. Regardless, I think this would fail WP:NFCC8 as it does not "significantly increase reader's understanding" especially...

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Also note that IMO it fails WP:NFCC8 because it doesn't depict much that couldn't be described in words (many...

does not significantly add to readers' understanding as required by WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

subject's] unlawful conduct" in a certain semi-notable public incident. Fails NFCC8: non-free images are unsuitable instruments for backing up historical claims...

free image (despite the uploader's tag) which I believe fails NFCC#1 and NFCC8. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

used in the infobox (because the winners image is in it), Fails Wikipedia:NFCC8, (Apologies if I didn't need to FFD this but I wasn't sure if WP:CSD F7...

should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was: delete. NFCC8 concerns have not been addresses, seems like Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions)...

range of topics (if indeed any at all), personality rights issues, fails WP:NFCC8, etc. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC) Image:My_album_my_band...

files really needed on their respective pages? Seems to be brushing WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 08:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Delete. It seems these screenshots...

characters :p -- lucasbfr talk 15:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails NFCC8 in all cases. Takver and CharlesGillingham's keep !votes are predicated...

Doesn't meet WP:NFCC2 (a free version could realistically be created) and WP:NFCC8 (doesn't add significant understanding to the subject/article Louisiana...

handed control to her son. A non-free image will require it to satisfy NFCC8, but in reality all it does is show what here face looks like. YellowMonkey...

uploads | upload log). non-free logo (though labeled PD), does not meet WP:NFCC8 when used in biography article Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)...

passing in one sentence) without seeing a photo of the book. This image fails NFCC8. Mangostar (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Image removed. --Eustress (talk)...

is not significant content about this book in the article, so it fails NFCC8. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC) Comment: If we can establish...

unnecessary and does not add significantly to readers' understanding (WP:NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Image:Nousoul.jpg (delete...

by Etrepan (notify | contribs). non-commercial use only, probably fails NFCC8 if nonfree (don't need to see an image of him... he was not an actor or...

Delete Not even a screenshot, but a promotional photograph that does fail NFCC8 by a mile; doesn't add any understanding to the episode linked outside of...

improved Bangkok's full city name among Thais, the nominated file fails NFCC8, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. Many Thais who...

because does not contribute significantly to readers' understanding (WP:NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...

providing any sort of critical commentary on the image. Fails NFCC1 and NFCC8. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:14, 16 January 2026 (UTC) Weak delete...

words and does not need the cartoon to be adequately described. Fails WP:NFCC8 It is also used in the article to push a particular POV against Greek attitudes...

not necessary for understanding the plot summary it accompanies. Fails NFCC8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

replaceable- I'm merely suggesting it may not be necessary (NFCC1 versus NFCC8). However, I accept that the other two images were more problematic, and...

(according to the article it's a scan from the 1962 catalog), fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Keep. Image was originally...

which it is used. -Nard 12:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Keep Appears to pass NFCC8 on both articles. Resolute 14:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC) Keep. Clear relationship...

the picture is so bad I couldn't really tell what it even was of.) Fails NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Comment. The nomination...

WP:PAGEDECIDE doesn't seem relevant to whether an image should be included, whereas NFCC8 states "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence...

history | logs) - uploaded by The_Mystery_Man (notify | contribs). fails WP:NFCC8: it is not necessary to see what the principal looked like to understand...

understand Nicaragua perfectly well without seeing this image, fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is...

| logs) - uploaded by Brant_Jones (notify | contribs). does not meet WP:NFCC8 - readers do not need to see this to understand article Calliopejen1 (talk)...

--TheImaCow (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NFCC8, since the image is inserted in the article without context and is not discussed...

for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs). Clearly not self-made, fails WP:NFCC8 (I just removed it from Bush Doctrine) Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:17, 14 September...

(talk) 10:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Absolutely not. There is policy that NFCC8 must be tested in every single case. There is no blanket allowance, and...

we're back again. Delete as per my previous rationales — irredeemably fails NFCC8 as it does not contribute to readers' understanding of the article. I know...

understanding. (I say that as someone who votes delete in probably most NFCC8 disputes.) However, I think it could probably be reduced from 20 seconds...

by Geo Swan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Doesn't meet WP:NFCC8 contextual significance: This image doesn't convey significant insight -...

actually about this issue precisely (and you'll notice that the change to NFCC8 has been unilaterally rejected so far). As I said above, the problem here...

that: The file will serve an important function in a particular article; (NFCC8) It cannot be replaced by any other, free illustration that might yet be...

kissing. Your argument reflects the second most common misinterpretation of NFCC8-compliance we see on deletion discussions (the first one being an image...

add captions explaining this logo, obviously the main issue here is still NFCC8, everybody here has different views on what is significant. I believe that...

in the Miles Davis article, where it was even less justified). Fails WP:NFCC8 - does not significantly increase readers' understanding. Just because this...

Codename Lisa (talk) 15:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Delete, doesn't meet the NFCC8 requirements. Stifle (talk) 14:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC) I'd suspect that...

diving career, I strongly but respectfully disagree that this file fails NFCC8. HouseBlastertalk 22:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC) "A photo posted by state police...

situation. I am quite aware that a significant number of these probably fail NFCC8, but if you don't check properly, mass nominations are always subject to...

reasearch. 67.85.125.17 (talk) 04:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC) It does not meet NFCC8. Seeing what he looked like at the time is not so contextually that we need...

equivalent, and it has no commercial value. The only potential issue is whether NFCC8 is satisfied, but I'd argue that "what did this person look like?" is almost...

equivalent, and it has no commercial value. The only potential issue is whether NFCC8 is satisfied, but I'd argue that "what did this person look like?" is almost...

addition to NFCC#2 and NFCC#1 concerns, this one might run up against #NFCC8. I honestly think it's going to be rare that non-free content is justified...

--Stefan2 (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC) That's an improper reading of NFCC8. The image is contextually significant for the reasons described in the...

being used in the article the rationale was written for, and would fail NFCC8 in it anyway. ÷seresin 00:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Delete Image is taken...

as to their willingness to license us the poster. But the invocation of NFCC8 is clearly, um, bull. Mangoe (talk) 02:16, 13 October 2011 (UTC) Is there...

not surprised? George Ho (talk) 09:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC) Delete fails NFCC8 . nonfree media should only be used in articles that exist, not what could...

what I can do. I also don't believe that the fair use images satisfy WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Your help would be appreciated...

homage as well as a character homage. I think it's on the right side of NFCC8. Sceptre (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Please make sure that all sentences...

song was consumed by the public. I am confused by this interpretation of NFCC8; is non-free content not allowed in article sections? I don't understand...

that make you neutral? Even if it passes WP:NFCC2, it still has to pass NFCC8 as well. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC) Well, since you...

argument is slightly weaker since it's such an old image. Mostly, fails WP:NFCC8 - while the image relates to a historic event, it does not itself illustrate...

(UTC) Strong delete- fails NFCC2, as it is a current press image, and fails NFCC8, as what he looked like when shouting this is not of any importance. Yes...

2008 (UTC) Can we put the point across that if you remove an image per NFCC8, you better be prepared to explain why? I think the whole "NFCC work is...

illustration by means of their logos; can easily be covered by text alone; fails NFCC8. Uploader has been edit-warring removing semi-speedy tags four times. Fut...

domain in india/pakistan (see templates). if it is nonfree, it fails WP:NFCC8 - we have many other photos of gandhi, and this one does not significantly...

non-free image is no longer needed. Fails WP:NFCC1 - has been replaced - and NFCC8. Just because people said his mugshot was creepy doesn't mean it needs to...

release, all duly sourced and useful to reader understanding (or whatever NFCC8 says these days) — the iconic banana, an image with the banana sticker peeled...

adequately explain that with text, so this image fails WP:NFCC1 and WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC) Ok then.... I agree....

subject. PhilKnight (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails NFCC8. Stifle (talk) 18:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Weak keep. Hayden's marriage...

facilitates the understanding of the amount of clipping greatly. The problem with NFCC8 is the phrasing "significantly increase": how much is significant? Wikipedia...

{Talk / Edits} 10:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC) Comment: I meant NFCC1 and not NFCC8. Struck that in my rationale above. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:12...

16:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC) I've removed the two images. They clearly fail NFCC8, and also NFCC3a because they're already used in their own articles. Black...

completely unavailable. walk victor falk talk 17:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC) NFCC8 discussions aren't evaluated according to what this or that reader might...

| history | logs) - uploaded by TsarSteve (notify | contribs). fails WP:NFCC8 - used in an article about the newspaper, not in the article about the photo...

but that doesn't make it a us govt work. the image doesn't satisfy WP:NFCC8 in the article - the card isn't mentioned in the article, and even if we...

updated." There is absolutely no further, sourced commentary about it. NFCC8 requires that a non-free image's presence "significantly increase readers'...

(delete | talk | history | links | Upon A Monster screenshot.jpg logs) – NFCC8, orphan, shows trademark characters in a commercial product. Text flows...

of the incident, as it is low-quality and unclear. As a side note, the NFCC8 discussion is moot because the source information is invalid, as the only...

Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 20:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NFCC8. Can understand collaboration without seeing this not terribly enlightening...

advertisement, does not significantly contribute to readers' understanding (WP:NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...

(notify | contribs | uploads). I believe that this image fails NFCC1 and NFCC8. There does not appear to be any significant discussion of this image or...

much as the next commenter, and it's a nice photo, but it simply fails WP:NFCC8 - that is, readers could understand Barack Obama and Ann Dunham perfectly...

jpg, which attracted many editors and closed as failing WP:NFCC8. This image is functionally identical to the old one, almost to the point...

released to the media in 2018. Definitely not a failure of the criteria of NFCC8. The removal of this image "would be detrimental" for that fact.--Kieronoldham...

replying {u - t? - uselessc} 16:21, 6 August 2025 (UTC) Delete, failing NFCC8, numerous colours used and the selection of these meets the TOO. Stifle...

possibly require more detail than this in order to get the gist of it (NFCC8). Yeah. ╟─TreasuryTag►stannator─╢ 16:13, 15 May 2011 (UTC) Delete Words...

uploaded by We_hope (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). fails WP:NFCC8 (does not significantly add to readers' understanding) and WP:NFCC1 (could...

Norton flags the website as unsafe) I am not convinced the image satisfies NFCC8. It's a grainy, small, black and white image, and the image in the infobox...

as given in the plot summary. The article itself is a mere stub. Fails NFCC8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Keep The image is of an episode...

the intricacies of image use is not the strongest. As far as I am aware, NFCC8 concerns contextual significance and I think, in a scandal carrying his...

of the topic Monarchy of Australia than any other photo of Charles (WP:NFCC8); the only unique understanding that it conveys is the understanding of...

created c. 2000.[4] So delete as an imaginary modern rendering that fails WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Okay, great job getting this...

--evrik (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC) This is a clear violation of NFLISTS/NFCC8 and as such the discussion was closed correctly. Black Kite (talk) 18:29...

replaceable by text (WP:NFCC#1). --Stefan2 (talk) 00:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC) NFCC8 doesn't require a specific level of discussion, it requires that their removal...

now I see where it is discussed in the text, but regardless it fails WP:NFCC8 - its omission would not be detrimental to readers' understanding. It's...

the 1700s. does not significantly increase readers' understanding per WP:NFCC8. also potentially replaceable by something created contemporaneously with...

I'm just going to nominate this photo for deletion bc I believe it fails NFCC8 and NFCC1. This may end this nomination, so interested parties should comment...

Itisbatgirl (notify | contribs). only used in actress article, fails WP:NFCC8 (doesn't significantly add to readers' understanding) Calliopejen1 (talk)...

MIESIANIACAL 17:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) delete, per nomination, fails NFCC8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC) That doesn't follow. The image...

reader. ww2censor is also correct about the traditional view of stamps and NFCC8. ÷seresin 01:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

(UTC) It's not a problem of sourcing, it's a matter of whether it meets WP:NFCC8. I don't think any reader would understand the 2002 Tonys any less without...

contribs). not necessary to see dead body to understand article, fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Delete - per nom. - Fastily...

simply do not see what Shell says there is to see in this image... Fails NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC) Image:Dubai Millennium...

uploaded by Staxringold (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). Fails WP:NFCC8. Nothing really special depicted here, just Kennedy looking normal in front...

game's art. — PyTom (talk) 03:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Delete, fails NFCC8. Stifle (talk) 10:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Fails fair use criteria...

text--again, text which can easily convey what is shown by the image. Fails NFCC8. I agree that Jbmurray is confounding the importance of the event with the...

violates the NFCC - just because someone says it does, doesn't mean it does. NFCC8 is a really subjective criterion, and simply stating that the NFCC is broken...

history | logs) - uploaded by Cantarevolare (notify | contribs). fails WP:NFCC8 - we already have one cover of vogue in the article, and the interpretation...

an article. Jay32183 (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Delete, fails NFCC8. Stifle (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

about with a blurry but generic-looking scientific thing. Fails NFCC1 and NFCC8. ╟─TreasuryTag►belonger─╢ 09:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...

(they charge for this use, we are basically stealing this from them) and NFCC8 (this photo doesn't significantly add to the readers' understanding, seeing...

was declined. Stifle (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Keep, I see no NFCC8 problem here, his Press Your Luck record was a notable feat for daytime...

use. Market role is to sell the right to use this image. Also possibly NFCC8. Does not add to the understanding of the perfect game ViperSnake151  Talk ...

There is nothing notable about his appearance in this mugshot. Fails WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC) The above comment reflects...

photo of the first guider-in-chief to understand Our Chalet - fails WP:NFCC8 Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is...

understand he was shot. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC) Delete it fails NFCC8 and the copyright belongs to Gazeta Shqiptare.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk...

all per NFCC3a (multiple non-free files used where one would suffice) and NFCC8 (omitting the images would not be detrimental to readers' understanding...

that potential justification for a FU image is null. The second issue is NFCC8, which stipulates that lack of a FU image in an article must be detrimental...

upload log). iOS icon for a variant of the Cut the Rope video game. Fails NFCC8 as not required to understand the article, also no longer used (I've removed...

photos of this living person get past NFCC1, they still have to get past NFCC8. Also, if the article meets FA status, does it really matter what the motivation...

to readers' understanding beyond description in article text (fails WP:NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC) I am fine with deletion,...

April 2009 (UTC) delete - doesn't add enough understanding to overcome NFCC8. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Keep: Sure the line: In...

easier than pissing in the shower, and twice as fun. Whether you can fix NFCC8 problems is an unrelated question. WilyD 16:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC) Videmius...

unlikely). Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 18:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Even if it met WP:NFCC8 (is that what you're addressing?), it would still fail WP:NFCC10 and possible...

permission,[NFCC4] be encyclopedic,[NFCC5] significantly enhance the article,[NFCC8] and comply with Wikipedia's media policy.[NFCC6] Non-free content must...

January 2010 (UTC) Keep with same rationale as the OSXBoxes file below -- NFCC8 assertion is tenuous at best. I don't see how showing pictures of the shrinkwrap...

can understand the pact without seeing an image of men sitting. Fails WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC) Keep The saying "A picture...

of episode. Screenshot of the g'day't glowbugs would come closer to pass NFCC8, otoh.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

correctly identify the copyright holder. Even if we were, it would fail NFCC8 (significance). Stifle (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Note to closing...

by contemporary sculptor, no freedom of panorama in bulgaria, fails WP:NFCC8 if nonfree Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

ladies, I'm the Cavalry closes the discussion as speedy delete: "...per NFCC8, or as a blatant infringement of fair use laws." [50] At 21:48 on 12 July...

more educational, since it informs readers who made the belt. I agree that NFCC8 is questionable, but think it meets that. Likely a moot point soon, though...

didn't really say what you said. --Damiens.rf 18:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC) NFCC8 is easily met - this is a photo of a combat aircraft (a P-3 Orion maritime...

2020 (UTC) Comment That's not how WP:Logo is deemed appropriate. It meets NFCC8 because of the contextual significance as one of the primary identifier...

history | logs) - uploaded by Soggybread (notify | contribs). violates WP:NFCC8: while this image is irreplaceable, it is not needed to understand the topic...

uploaded by Aubernas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8 & WP:NFCC1. Building still exists for a CC file to be produced. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦»...

21:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Also the screenshot of the memorial group fails NFCC8, because we can understand the concept perfectly well w/o seeing a picture...

uploaded by Thx2005 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).  Fails WP:NFCC8. A pre-renovation image isn't a strong rationale to license this as a fair...

(talk) 11:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC) Delete very much above TOO, and fails NFCC8 per nom. HouseBlastertalk 12:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC) The above is preserved...

and there is no criticism of this image anywhere. Clearly in violation of NFCC8. J Milburn (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Weak delete: I've bounced back...

that: The file will serve an important function in a particular article; (NFCC8)". Adding the image DOES improve the reader's understanding of the article...

contribs | uploads | upload log).  I am not seeing how this image meets WP:NFCC8. The Guardian is not being discussed in the article (Al-Qaeda), and even...

Doc talk 09:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Could you comment on why this passes NFCC8? Your keep rationale addresses a straw man (relationship of featured articles...

event. Fails any number of NFCC: no source, no explanation how it meets NFCC8, no meaningful rationale. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC) The above...

the stadium image would be better, but not convinced that it still meets NFCC8. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Keep Text being unreadable...

specify its original creator and copyright status. This in addition to the NFCC8 problem – not clear what information value it actually contributes to the...

because the article constitutes critical commentary about the work, and with NFCC8, because cover art is normally an integral part of the work – readers must...

things) which doesn't show those things is nearly useless. These clearly meet NFCC8, though sourced commentary would make for a much stronger case. Hobit (talk)...

sources on it and the fact the video section is a one-liner). Clearly fails NFCC8. –Davey2010Talk 15:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

citing/linking NFCC8 and then speedying the images as non-free orphaned? __meco (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Safest way for NFCC8 vios is IfD. Simply...

files per WP:NFCC8" completely misses the point of NFCC8. You cannot just look at an image for one second and decide "oh, this fails NFCC8". (This is what...

photo. —teb728 t c 05:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Obvious delete, this fails NFCC8 about as obviously as it gets. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Delete...

isn't currently used (removed here), but IMHO could be) it fails WP:NFCC#NFCC8 for Nickelodeon (Philippines), the only place it is currently in use. Andy...

important in order to understand this important but simple fact? According to NFCC8, the image itself (not simply the fact it illustrates) must make a crucial...

here fail NFCC3a (because they are excessive, being used elswhere), and NFCC8 (because there is no critical commentary, because this article is merely...

my team can't win the game, so I'm going to deflate the ball". As for NFCC8 lovers, how can you possibly, even remotely possibly, tell me what increases...

rationale". A "fair use rationale" in this case means "delete me per NFCC8" because NFCC8 (which is designed to protect commercial copyright holders) is very...

must be said that at least some of the 'keep' arguments failed to address NFCC8 – ie. they failed to rebut the point made by those lobbying for deletion...

'delete'—neither of the 'keep' votes remotely addressed NFCC1, and neither addressed NFCC8. The first one was a strange combination of WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS...

☼ 14:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC) Overturn to keep, largely per Sandstein. NFCC8 is not a licence to supervote.—S Marshall T/C 11:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)...

go. This isn't an article about the logo and they aren't discussed per NFCC8 in any way that passes the criteria. Black Kite kite (talk) 20:34, 20 June...

of the article. I am not necessarily convinced on the NFCC1 point, but NFCC8 is clearly not met. Stifle (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Endorse. GijsVisser (talk ·...

readers to see the back of his gravestone in the article, so it fails WP:NFCC8. HOWEVER, the front is not copyrighted. Let's just crop the image and keep...

licensing tags are just plain wrong and we don't need to make any case under NFCC8. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) What's the evidence that the Chilean government provided...

think we need more information. Stamps are copyrighted, and on Wikipedia NFCC8 is taken very seriously and given great weight. I do accept that the image...

important in order to understand this important but simple fact? According to NFCC8, the image itself (not simply the fact it illustrates) must make a crucial...

different. My personal opinion would be that the image doesn't comply with NFCC8, but the time for me to have said that was at the IFD itself. Overturn deletion...

2008 (UTC) NFCC8 is not WP:BLP. This is far from the first time I've seen an admin unilaterally declare that an image does not meet NFCC8. This is an...

files per WP:NFCC8" completely misses the point of NFCC8. You cannot just look at an image for one second and decide "oh, this fails NFCC8". (This is what...

increased the viewer's knowledge of the episode, thus ensuring that they fail NFCC8. It would have course have been different had the article been about the...

artist. Jheald (talk) 23:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC) The problem is that NFCC8 isn't a bright line. I'd say it is _well_ over the line here and I'm somewhat...

showing what the person looked like is deemed to be sufficient to pass NFCC8, provided that commercial interests of the copyright holder aren't infringed...

bottom of the article to merely illustrate the first season. Thus fails WP:NFCC8 as it isn't really contextually significant. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -...

think we need more information. Stamps are copyrighted, and on Wikipedia NFCC8 is taken very seriously and given great weight. I do accept that the image...

must be said that at least some of the 'keep' arguments failed to address NFCC8 – ie. they failed to rebut the point made by those lobbying for deletion...

I'm just going to nominate this photo for deletion bc I believe it fails NFCC8 and NFCC1. This may end this nomination, so interested parties should comment...

rationale". A "fair use rationale" in this case means "delete me per NFCC8" because NFCC8 (which is designed to protect commercial copyright holders) is very...

increased the viewer's knowledge of the episode, thus ensuring that they fail NFCC8. It would have course have been different had the article been about the...

regarding this specific scene, an image illustrating it may be appropriate." NFCC8 says "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly...

around for some time and has way more than 500 edits.) The problem with NFCC8 is that neither of the images themselves actually adds to readers' understanding...

licensing tags are just plain wrong and we don't need to make any case under NFCC8. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) What's the evidence that the Chilean government provided...

☼ 14:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC) Overturn to keep, largely per Sandstein. NFCC8 is not a licence to supervote.—S Marshall T/C 11:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)...

years old and not on the national scene. None of the fair use pictures pass NFCC8 - they just show what she looks like. YellowMonkey (click here to choose...

I've updated the request to use {{Non-free 3D art}} -- I think it meets NFCC8/NFC-CS as it represents a configuration and relative size of a design that...

homage as well as a character homage. I think it's on the right side of NFCC8. Sceptre (talk) 05:38, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Please make sure that all sentences...

readers to see the back of his gravestone in the article, so it fails WP:NFCC8. HOWEVER, the front is not copyrighted. Let's just crop the image and keep...

permission,[NFCC4] be encyclopedic,[NFCC5] significantly enhance the article,[NFCC8] and comply with Wikipedia's media policy.[NFCC6] Non-free content must...

about 8. There's been a lot of debate about it's wording in the past (WP:NFCC8). My personal favorite template to use with these types of images is the...

omission of this picture decrease the readers' understanding of the subject? NFCC8 requires that question to be answered. It wasn't. In FFD debates that concern...

violates the NFCC - just because someone says it does, doesn't mean it does. NFCC8 is a really subjective criterion, and simply stating that the NFCC is broken...

the intricacies of image use is not the strongest. As far as I am aware, NFCC8 concerns contextual significance and I think, in a scandal carrying his...

'delete'—neither of the 'keep' votes remotely addressed NFCC1, and neither addressed NFCC8. The first one was a strange combination of WP:ILIKEIT and WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS...

of the article. I am not necessarily convinced on the NFCC1 point, but NFCC8 is clearly not met. Stifle (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Endorse. GijsVisser (talk ·...

to prevent is being deleted are a) add a fair use rationale (but meeting NFCC8 needs to be addressed in the article), b) see if the photo does have a known...

different. My personal opinion would be that the image doesn't comply with NFCC8, but the time for me to have said that was at the IFD itself. Overturn deletion...

in text - the image isn't crucial for understanding of the subject (WP:NFCC8 "contextual significance"). Consigned (talk) 23:34, 30 January 2026 (UTC)...

that: The file will serve an important function in a particular article; (NFCC8) It cannot be replaced by any other, free illustration that might yet be...

21:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Also the screenshot of the memorial group fails NFCC8, because we can understand the concept perfectly well w/o seeing a picture...

for the fact that the image fails NFCC1 (as it's replaceable by text) and NFCC8 (as its removal would not be detrimental to readers' undertanding of the...

replaceable- I'm merely suggesting it may not be necessary (NFCC1 versus NFCC8). However, I accept that the other two images were more problematic, and...

marketing section is badly lacking and the image is unreferenced, thus failing nfcc8, as its omission would be detrimental to my understanding Fasach Nua (talk)...

more explicit case should be made on the info page, and in relation to NFCC8 in the caption, which doesn't exist yet. What do you mean by this? The map...

of non-free content, fails WP:NFCC8, hence WP:WIAFA3 Fasach Nua (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC) It does not fail NFCC8 either, however I see you have...

what I can do. I also don't believe that the fair use images satisfy WP:NFCC8. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Your help would be appreciated...

respective articles. And the use of 30 non-free files seems to violate WP:NFCC8 ----Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:50, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

found. Remove from Attempted assassination of Donald Trump not meeting NFCC8 "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence...

I’m not sure that this photo qualifies as it I don’t think it passes WP:NFCC8, so I will let someone else offer their opinion. cyberdog958Talk 13:35,...

AfD. In the process, this user has committed excessive violations of WP:NFCC8, as seen on the file pages for the logos they uploaded, as well as on the...

song was consumed by the public. I am confused by this interpretation of NFCC8; is non-free content not allowed in article sections? I don't understand...