ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

draft bearing this notice before seeking to delete it. Shortcut WP:NMFDWP:NMFD Drafts that do not meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion can still...

the few times that I will actually !vote Keep on NMFD grounds. If the argument for deletion is only NMFD, then that is no argument. Robert McClenon (talk)...

applies. Legacypac (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Keep. Nomination fails WP:NMFD. Plausibly notable dead composer. Not stale. Inactive user is not a deletion...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep . Per WP:NMFD (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 09:56, 9 November 2017...

violates WP:NMFD, the nominator has made no valid rationale for deletion, Speedy keep. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC) If WP:NMFD prevents us...

17:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:NMFD. SK2242 (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Keep per per WP:NMFD. No need to bring such pages here. — Godsy (TALKCONT)...

significant improvement DGG ( talk ) 19:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD. Meets the repeated, disruptive submissions clause and will likely never...

should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: keep per WP:NMFD and SmokeyJoe. Killiondude (talk) 06:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Draft:Lionzera (edit...

number. You can ask me why here. 17:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:NMFD. SK2242 (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Keep since drafts are not checked...

Jalen D. Folf (talk • contribs) 20:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Keep. Per WP:NMFD, MfD is not for making Wikipedia-notability judgements. Submitted once, User:Dan_arndt...

WP:NMFD. MfD does not examine notability. Drafts are not required to meet the GNG. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Failing...

17:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:NMFD. SK2242 (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Keep per per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 11:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)...

the backlog. Legacypac (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Decline per WP:NMFD. Plausibly notable anyway. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)...

quite similar.) Nominators are reminded that there is no need to bring WP:NMFD situations to MfD. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet 16:31, 17 April 2021...

not notability. Drafts cannot be deleted for not being notable - see WP:NMFD. Having said that, I don't think this company is notable, so this draft will...

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per SmokeyJoe and WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. This arguably falls...

before the second submission. Notability isn't a primary concern here per WP:NMFD. The topic itself is fairly new, a better claim that it is notable may be...

to this page. The result of the discussion was: procedural close . Per WP:NMFD, drafts are not open for "notability" deletion discussions. If a reviewer...

per WP:NMFD, though I have no doubt it will be G13'd. — csc-1 16:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC) WP:BLP is policy that is active in all namespaces. NMFD does...

WP:NFF is a notability criterion, which does not apply in draft space per WP:NMFD. Plausible topic. VQuakr (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC) With respect...

that was not the case. Looking back, I think it was silly that I cited WP:NMFD as if it were a policy when I forgot to verify whether it is or is not. I...

will start the page Legacypac (talk) 13:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Keep. WP:NMFD; an uphill battle is not the same thing as implausibility. Some college players...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: keep. Ignore by WP:NMFD (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Draft:Microsoft...

Draft:Total Fruit Island (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ See WP:NMFD. This was a web series inspired by Battle for Dream Island back when it was...

Keep per WP:NMFD. Do not bring drafts to MfD due to a notability concern. Leave for G13. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC) NMFD applies when...

considerably after each decline. So, time to delete it then? Good lord. Besides, WP:NMFD is a thing and the only reason cited for deletion here is an article notability...

The result of the discussion was: keep. Consensus is that this is a WP:NMFD "should never have been nominated" case. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet...

to develop their own process. WP:NMFD happened for a reason. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC) NMFD is not even policy. Legacypac (talk)...

(UTC) Keep - I didn't say it was the only time that I would !vote on WP:NMFD grounds. Harmless. I would favor introducing some standard of notability...

mainspace article. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and leave for WP:G13. MfD is not well used to discuss notability or COI....

this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD, especially due to the statement that it is likely the subject will become...

specified in WP:NMFD, and so the suggested reason for deletion does not apply. I am not here arguing against the recent changes to WP:NMFD, rather I am citing...

which does not apply in draft space per WP:NMFD. Plausible topic. VQuakr (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC) WP:NMFD is no policy, just a poorly summarized...

English. Lard Almighty (talk) 09:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Keep, please read WP:NMFD. Sun8908 Talk 10:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC) My bad. Withdrawn. Lard Almighty...

does not apply in draft space per WP:NMFD. Plausible topic. VQuakr (talk) 01:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:08, 6 September...

May not meet WP:NBIO. —PaleoNeonate – 19:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Per WP:NMFD, notability requirements such as NBIO do not apply to draft space. I've nominated...

that fails N and V Legacypac (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Unambiguously doesn't fail WP:V, and plausible as a draft. VQuakr (talk)...

2018 (UTC) No BLP violations. No offensive promotion. Speedy close per WP:NMFD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC) Although, User:TonyBallioni might...

Draft:Alanna Arrington (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:NMFD.Resubmission without imoprovement. ∯WBGconverse 05:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)...

Wikipedia-notable. However, MfD is not for examining notability. See WP:NMFD and WP:NDRAFT. Leave it for standard WP:AfC processing. SmokeyJoe (talk)...

indicating (I think hindex more like 40 is the threshold). At MfD it fails WP:NMFD, the author keeps working on it, and resubmissions are but following the...

logs)Unsourced BLP. Adam9007 (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD, otherwise just leave it for WP:G13. — csc-1 03:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)...

doesn't meet WP:BIO SoundwavTheOG (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Only two days old and submitted once. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:53, 7 July 2018...

unsourced Legacypac (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Speedy close WP:NMFD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...

the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined...

--Frontman830 (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — csc-1 14:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Notability is not considered in regard to drafts...

22:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC) I'm not relying on the specific wording of NMFD. DUD is just bad advice that encourages people to work on crap topics in...

abandoned in Draft space Legacypac (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. VQuakr (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

this EdNg07 but notability explicitly does not apply to draftspace,see WP:NMFD. Indeed WP:drafts are not checked for notability or sanity, now can you please...

(talk) 21:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Keep looks like a draft, not a resume. WP:NMFD. VQuakr (talk) 07:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Delete, that is clearly a resume...

notable company. Csgir (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC) Speedy close per WP:NMFD. If not notable, the standard G13 process will handle it. —SmokeyJoe (talk)...

ref abandoned page Legacypac (talk) 08:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Appears plausible. VQuakr (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Delete, vanity...

again. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...

reject. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 06:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep: Per WP:NMFD, notability is not a reason to delete a draft. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:30, 29...

not coming back to improve Legacypac (talk) 06:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC) WP:NMFD. However, since this miscellany appears to be leftover from a cut and paste...

(UTC) Non-notable bio Legacypac (talk) 22:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Update remove vanity bio/FAKEARTICE...

log? It is rarely productive to bring non-G11s to MfD. “Not notable”? WP:NMFD. Notability is not required in draftspace. “Advertisements masquerading as...

or speedy renomination here (though I would suggest taking a look at WP:NMFD before taking the latter road). (non-admin closure) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:44...

restored less then a month ago, and notability isn't a concern here per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 20:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

2017" is the majority of the page's content. Wording is neutral. Taking WP:NMFD into consideration, letting this likely go per G13 seems to be the best course...

stuff he is sifting. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Keep. WP:NMFD. VQuakr (talk) 06:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

write about yourself. Legacypac (talk) 00:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Decline WP:NMFD. Not a plausible autobiography. The subject is possibly notable, is successful...

not a dictionary Kaseng55 (talk) 16:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD, WP:NOTDIC doesn't mean we don't have articles on notable words (see Category:Pejorative...

draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD unless it rises to the level of G11. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:53, 1 September...

—SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Keep per SmokeyJoe and WP:NMFD. The creator is blocked, but someone might salvage the draft. — Godsy (TALKCONT)...

(talk) 17:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC) Keep sources available online and "likely" WP:NMFD. Plausibly useful. VQuakr (talk) 04:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC) Comment not really...

draftspace is a proper place to attempt to write an article. See also WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC) It's copyvio. That trumps a...

if it is not submitted it can be ignored and taken care of by g13. No WP:NMFD reason to delete has been given, it has not been tendentiously resubmitted...

this is clearly not a serious attempt at an article, also note that per WP:NMFD drafts are not evaluated for notability. — csc-1 03:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)...

last year. "Old draft" is not a reason to delete; nor is notability per WP:NMFD. VQuakr (talk) 02:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

not for meme Kaseng55 (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NMFD. — csc-1 17:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Memes that are notable can have articles...

Wikipedia. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If it is speediable, speedy it. Maybe the author believes it will become...

(UTC) Agreed; notability itself is not a reason to list something here - WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

rejecting. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD.— Godsy (TALKCONT) 09:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...

goat feed. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...

without a notability claim. Legacypac (talk) 01:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Keep. WP:NMFD. If this were a notability discussion, one might point out that the subject...

me otherwise. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD: "Drafts are not subject to article deletion criteria like 'no context' or...

WP:NACTOR is a secondary notability guideline. WP:NMFD. VQuakr (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC) your link to WP:NMFD ignores the substantial caveats in the underlying...

notability issues getting moved to mainspace but not impossible. See WP:NMFD given that nomination only cited a notability guideline and a notability...

and was abandoned. SWinxy (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If nothing comes of it, it will meet G13. No need to bring such things here...

meeting, the WP:GNG. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. May be due for a shot at the more perilous survival landscape of the mainspace...

and was abandoned. SWinxy (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If nothing comes of it, it will meet G13. No need to bring such things here...

Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 08:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC) @Kiteinthewind: See WP:NMFD; notability guidelines do not apply to drafts. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:47,...

per WP:NMFD. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Keep, this meets WP:GNG.VR talk 14:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. SK2242...

and was abandoned. SWinxy (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If nothing comes of it, it will meet G13. No need to bring such things here...

WP:NMFD — Godsy (TALKCONT) 14:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Actually, a draft can be deleted if it is hopelessly not going to meet notability. per WP:NMFD...

and was abandoned. SWinxy (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If nothing comes of it, it will meet G13. No need to bring such things here...

(talk) 15:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC) Ignore until G13-eligible. Decline per WP:NMFD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC) Redirect the page at Doom...

may add them later. Likely not notable, but that is not a concern per WP:NMFD. G13 will shatter this if nothing comes of it. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:42,...

diddling. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:TIND. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:57, 4 September 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

examination. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NMFD, doesn't appear to be a hoax. — csc-1 00:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC) The above...

standalone notability. Raymie (t • c) 04:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep - No draft here...

Kailash29792 (talk) 09:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NMFD, save it for WP:G13. — csc-1 16:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per above...

notability under PROF Legacypac (talk) 02:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC) Keep. WP:NMFD. Also, likely meets WP:NACADEMIC #5. VQuakr (talk) 22:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)...

in DraftSpace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

offensive. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:NOTCENSORED. This may not be suitable for a standalone article but...

nominator. CoolSkittle (talk) 14:31, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Delete per everyone above...

MfD nomination that only cites notability concerns defaults to Keep per WP:NMFD. The draft is only 3 days old; no need to rush a draft to deletion. VQuakr...

another reason. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:NDRAFT. The timekeeper of G13 works with little sand; it will be deletable...

is absent. Lack of notability is not a reason to delete a draft (see WP:NMFD), and perceived low likelihood of the draft being finished is also not a...

wrong process. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Decline per WP:NMFD. MfD is not for discussing notability. Plausibly notable. COI is abhavioural...

15:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Delete four declines is somewhat borderline in WP:NMFD terms for repeated resubmission, but given the total improvement between...

Redirect, WP:SRE. "Not notable" is not a reason to bring a draft to MfD, per WP:NMFD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Duplicate of extraterrestrial...

MFD'd. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:55, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Comment – Appears to be...

January 2023 (UTC) Keep. I don't think this is the right venue as - per WP:NMFD, drafts don't have to demonstrate notability (non-notable drafts just don't...

page[citation needed] 13:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC) keep in draft per WP:NMFD. MfD is not for discussion the notability of drafts. Leave for AfC processes...

2018 (UTC) DES appears unaware of the recent RFC approved changes to WP:NMFD. They should retract their criticism of this nomination. This page is one...

article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Close per WP:NMFD. Not promotion or WEBHOSTing. Hopeless, but non-harmful. It needs Rejection...

use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 01:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — csc-1 02:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC) Delete as a bad joke, and made up in...

any info). realsanix (Hello!) 02:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Notability is not a concern here and it might get translated. If not, the...

McClenon (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Soft delete per G13. See also WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

serious concern. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:TIND. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 20:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

boot. ShinyDialga777 (talk) 19:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD as tendentiously resubmitted, turned away 5 times including two rejections...

than mainspace page Dexxtrall (talk) 23:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD/WP:NDRAFT. User:Ahthga YramTalk with me! I want to change my name! 01:04...

notability or sanity. Vaticidalprophet 04:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. WP:NDRAFT looks intriguing; going to give it a thorough...

and was abandoned. SWinxy (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If nothing comes of it, it will meet G13. No need to bring such things here...

deal with him. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Happy to reconsider if there are other concerns. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:55...

the June 6 AfD close Legacypac (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Eastmain must have seen something promising in the draft because they recently...

in draftspace. Adam9007 (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. G13 exists, so there is no need to speedy or bring here. — Godsy (TALKCONT)...

mainspace is acceptable in this case. Notability is not a concern per WP:NMFD. Thus, I believe the only viable concern that has been expressed is that...

notability of the local non profit is just not there. Per the changes to WP:NMFD I am bringing this for deletion discussion. Legacypac (talk) 10:47, 9 October...

McClenon (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Retain in some form per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Keep per Robert McClenon:...

me otherwise. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Drafts are given leeway. Notability may not have yet been established; draftspace...

long now. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD as repeatedly resubmitted, declined twice and rejected three times. That's...

2018 (UTC) After examining sources, the artist looks not notable, but WP:NMFD. Can’t criticise the newcomer for resubmissions when every decline leaves...

become a valid article. Cu rent notability is not relevant here as per WP:NMFD. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 07:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

sources. Calm down. Egaoblai (talk) 10:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and Egaoblai. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Comment I understand...

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per SmokeyJoe and WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Weak Keep - This draft...

book author... Davidelit (Talk) 04:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. @Davidelit: How is Iq84l an "editor with [a] similar name to [the] book...

additions. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. The rolling rites of G13 will desecrate this if nothing comes of it anyhow...

McClenon (talk) 04:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC) Keep per those above and WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. WP:SKEEP#1&WP:NMFD: Lack of notability is explicitly not one of the deletion reasons that apply...

he is obsessed). Orange Mike | Talk 16:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Graeme Bartlett must have seen something promising in the draft because...

one-liners. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

this comment) "stale". A2soup (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 14:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

2021 (UTC) Keep notability explicitly does not apply to draftspace see WP:NMFD. If submitted as is it will be declined. If not submitted it can be ignored...

acceptance. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Note: The creator has been...

a draft (or sandbox) to MfD should be a rare case. In particular, per WP:NMFD notability does not apply to drafts. Please also review WP:BITE. VQuakr (talk)...

16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Keep valid draft on a non-notable topic, per WP:NMFD.—Alalch E. 07:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:NDRAFT. MfD is not for curating...

useful for that. -SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. It may get translated; otherwise, the G13 roomba will navigate to there...

is non-neutrally written. 14:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. It has never been rejected; at least give them feedback...

Promotional material Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. WP:TOOSOON is a reason for it to be in draftspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:57...

Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. That something was deleted from the mainspace has little bearing here. If...

for you relax on the rush to deletion. Notability is not relelvant per WP:NMFD. VQuakr (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Incorrect - the Draft will be...

event. GiantSnowman 11:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Decline and close per WP:NMFD. In RfCs, the community has clearly said that drafts should not be deleted...

for now. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. No reason for deletion has been presented. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:42, 19...

I will withdraw this but do you think it would be possible to update WP:NMFD with a new wording? Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply)...

submitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Additionally, not being edited in "the last three month[s]" is not a reason...

like advertisement. Yann (talk) 16:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. If it has problems that make it speediable, then speedy it. Otherwise, G13...

September 2021 (UTC) Keep notability does not apply to draft space see WP:NMFD, nor is likely to be vandalised a DELREASON. Sure it's junk in it's present...

McClenon (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per those above and WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

clearer. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Decline per WP:NMFD. MfD is not for evaluating ntoability questions. RE: waste of time? Solution:...

WP:NBOOK. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. The authors may believe it will become notable shortly. If that is not realized...

valid draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 20:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

That is not reason to delete a page. "Fails WP:ACTOR" fails WP:NMFD. I would like to see quick action taking against Undeclared Paid Editors...

and others'. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 17:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC) The above...

suggested. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 05:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

draft is still being actively worked on, and therefore does not meet WP:NMFD. Bradv 00:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Keep. Author appears to be attempting to...

deleting yet. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:19, 20 April 2019 (UTC) Delete: ignore all rules,...

Fails WP:CRYSTALBALL Kaseng55 (talk) 04:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD; no need to list such things here. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:47, 29 March 2021...

page about them. Legacypac (talk) 23:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Decline. WP:NMFD. Not quite G11-worthy. MfD is not for making notability decisions on drafts...

find or wait for additional sources is perfectly appropriate. As per WP:NMFD notability is not a relevant issue in draft space. No policy-based reason...

notability reasons. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. This is not a venue to debate notability. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 14:12, 15 July...

It has only been declined twice so may be too early to delete? I think WP:NMFD applies here? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:46, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Delete:...

(whence this MfD). -- Taku (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

as tendentiously resubmitted. Declined and rejected four times each. WP:NMFD allows deletion in these circumstances and it's time for this to go. Regards...

subject but, worse, violating WP:NOTMEMORIAL. (XfD nomination rooted in WP:NMFD.) Drmies (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC) Delete. I was just looking at this...

resubmitted. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NMFD, as it hasn't been resubmitted following the rejection. — csc-1 02:01, 15...

WP:ITSADRAFT. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

(UTC) Delete per nom, clear explanation as to why this isn't a case of WP:NMFD. — csc-1 02:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...

DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Drafts are a place to learn and this may eventually shape into something...

Among Us for POTUS (talk) 02:03, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Keep. Please see WP:NMFD—drafts are not required to demonstrate notability, and because of WP:G13...

improved. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. Has potential. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 11:37, 11 February 2021...

meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy. as WP:NMFD now requires to make a draft deletable for repeated resubmisisons? DES (talk)DESiegel...

actually notable. Legacypac (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:NODEADLINE. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Comment...

links | watch | logs)​ Drafts aren't typically eligible for deletion per WP:NMFD so I can't say I feel very passionately about this MfD, but this one in particular...

them? Amisom (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC) I haven't, because, as pr WP:NMFD it isn't relevant here -- notability is not up for discussion here. There...

fine. IronManCap (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Keep and ignore per WP:NMFD. If this were submitted it would need to be declined, otherwise it should...

hard work will be lost. A2soup (talk) 03:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and because the creator intends to work on it in what is a proper place for...

months if no one works on it. ~ GB fan 10:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Comment - See...

concern. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 13:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

coverage spans 85 years. VQuakr (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and VQuakr. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 14:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

Robert and Liz that it is not helpful to nominate stale drafts at MfD: see WP:NMFD. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Thanks for the widespread...

their deletion. Vaticidalprophet 09:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD, see above comments about G13. — csc-1 04:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Keep -...

and left for g13. Notability explicitly does not apply to draftspace WP:NMFD, and WP:RAGPICKING is a waste of time. Regards, 213.193.27.121 (talk) 15:56...

history. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC) Delete both per WP:NMFD as repeatedly resubmitted. Each has been turned away seven times with a total...

for g13. If tendentiously resubmitted then go ahead and nominate per WP:NMFD. Remember, WP:drafts are not checked for notability or sanity and WP:RAGPICKING...

territory and it will clearly never meet the requirements for mainspace. WP:NMFD pretty clearly allows deletion in these circumstances. Regards, 31.41.45...

to be notable. Legacypac (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and SmokeyJoe. Not being "edited in roughly 2.5 months" is not a reason for...

history first. Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:NDRAFT. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC) Weak Delete...

Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 17:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and DESiegel. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep -...

2019 (UTC) “Not notable” is not a reason for deletion in userspace. See WP:NMFD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC) A 23 year old workpractice...

2017 (UTC) Keep and trout nominator. We don't do notability at MFD per WP:NMFD, but if this were AfD the nomination still would be troutworthy given that...

support as well. Historyday01 (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. May resume production etc. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 11:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)...

ignore. Zmbro notability explicitly does not apply to draftspace, see WP:NMFD; nor are pages are deleted because the user was subsequently blocked, note...

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:24, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Yikes. Delete per WP:NMFD. I'd say the LLM usage and WP:DEL14 count for a deletion reason, and it is...

of this MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...

— pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 21:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:55, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Keep I am actively improving...

Reviewing this would be hard and will waste even more time. Decline per WP:NMFD. Remove the AfC tags and talk to the author. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:58, 20...

second submission. Secondly, notability isn't a primary concern here per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 20:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC) Delete as advertisement. --Calton...

this a lost cause? Legacypac (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC) Keep WP:NMFD; not terribly likely they will be able to convince an AFCer that it meets...

comments on the draft describe why it has not been accepted. Delete per WP:NMFD Legacypac (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Comment Horrible draft, but...

for less than 48 hours and has not been resubmitted tendentiously so WP:NMFD applies. The editor should be given time to establish notability, or the...

Delete COI + Not notable. SK2242 (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Redirect/Merge to Draft:Claudio...

death of G13. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and because it can be allowed the "natural death of G13." No need to discuss...

article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and because it should be allowed the mercy of G13. No need to discuss pages...

opposed to an "S". — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Drafts are given leeway (unless they are causing problems, which this one...

G13'd in 6 months. JC7V (talk) 07:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Also, not rejected but declined. COI doesn't necessitate deletion, if that...

main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Weak Keep per WP:NMFD. Weak because if this had been redirected to the mainspace version as drafts...

notability guidelines is not considered sufficient reason to delete a draft (WP:NMFD). (non-admin closure) —Alalch E. 00:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Draft:Betsy...

WP:HOAX, and WP:G3. No point in waiting for G13 per the criteria at WP:NMFD. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 04:29, 3 August 2025 (UTC) Delete...

encyclopedic topic at some point. Hut 8.5 09:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and those above. One purpose of draftspace is to house content not yet appropriate...

--WaltCip-(talk) 19:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Keep per those above and WP:NDRAFT & WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC) Like I pretty much agree...

nor is it borderline speediable so no reason to nominate it here see WP:NMFD. This is junk but draftspace is full of junk, since it's noindexed no one...

blogs. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and WP:TIND. Non-AfC userspace is immune to G13 for various sensible reasons...

waste of editors’ time. —- Taku (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. It likely will not be cleaned up unless someone believes the topic has potential...

notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. The content might be fit for merging somewhere; the draftspace is not solely...

blocked for a week. Magitroopa (talk) 04:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. I removed the bits that seemed unreasonable for a draft. — Godsy (TALKCONT)...

failed AfC review. BOVINEBOY2008 20:32, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD. Draftifying would just lead us back to where we are now. Vegantics (talk)...

nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, but see WP:NMFD; the standards for article deletion are much stricter than those for draft...

Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:38, 23 February 2026 (UTC) See WP:NMFD, which says "Failure to demonstrate that the topic meets notability guidelines...

should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: keep see WP:NMFD (wp:non-admin closure) Serprinss (talk) please ping on reply. 10:42, 30 September...

discussion was: keep . Per Praxidicae, doesn't qualify for deletion under WP:NMFD as it has not been tendentiously resubmitted. We don't delete on pure notability...

not checked for notability or sanity, it's not a g11, nor is there any WP:NMFD reason for deletion. Draftspace is noindexed, if not improved this will be...

harmless draft. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Orangemike but notability explicitly does not apply to draftspace see WP:NMFD. If this were submitted it would need to be declined, if it is not submitted...

independent sources. --Randykitty (talk) 08:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Keep as per WP:NMFD, notability is not relevant in draft space. No valid policy-based reason...

of anything anywhere. VQuakr (talk) 08:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD, A2soup, and VQuakr. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 17:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC) The above...

deletion discussions. Matthew_hk tc 11:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Decline per WP:NMFD. None of the five sources listed are useful. The nominator has not given...

apply to drafts, and shouldn't be the primary concern of mfd nominations; WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC) @Godsy: I know, but no improvements...

👑 Matthew Wellington – 18:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:NDRAFT and WP:NMFD. Notability concerns are not a reason to delete from draftspace, but a reason...

stupid calendar. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. As Robert points out above as well, the carcinogen that is G13 will likely...

rush to delete drafts. VQuakr (talk) 01:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and VQuakr. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC) It was in mainspace...

27 January 2022 (UTC) Why? Fram (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC) WP:NMFD; drafts are not subject to article deletion criteria like "no context," "no...

has not been edited. Notability is not a pertinent primary concern per WP:NMFD. U5 is inapplicable per SmokeyJoe. No applicable grounds for deletion have...

raised, it is reasonable to give this topic some leeway in draftspace per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Keep: The man may or may not...

eight youtube links. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Keep WP:NMFD. The draft doesn't seem so obviously self-serving that G11 applies. Here's...

was also mentioned by multiple participants at the RFC that is cited at WP:NMFD. In this case, however, there is no such consensus. The only other arguments...

of drafts, a well attended RfC clarified that, linked somewhere from WP:NMFD. My suggestion, one yet to be formally adopted although it is actually standard...

something missed by BGGGort2020 (talk) 21:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 11:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

draft. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 13:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC) It probably does, but WP:NMFD. MfD can't handle every draft of dubious notability. Keep. Testing for notability...

current notability is not a reason for deletion in draft space, as per WP:NMFD. Harmless in draft space. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:38, 5 April 2018...

-"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 21:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NDRAFT and WP:NMFD - Draftspace is just the place for someone to attempt to demonstrate the...

the nominator who is causing drama. Whether the subject is notable is WP:NMFD, not a criterion. There is nothing obviously wrong with this draft. It isn't...

refferring to Casspedia hence there is no reason to nominate it here see WP:NMFD. This is junk but nearly everything in draftspace is junk, because it's noindexed...

that it has no mainspace merge target, and that it should be deleted. WP:NMFD says that you should not bring it to MfD to delete because of notability...

--cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 06:35, 8 August 2025 (UTC) Just to quote Wikipedia:NMFD: "Failure to demonstrate that the topic meets notability guidelines is not...

Incompetent processes at play, deletion will just hide the evidence. And WP:NMFD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Keep No harm in letting G13...

have been rejected yet. Lack of notability has no bearing on drafts per WP:NMFD. Any reason not to simply let WP:G13 work as it normally does here? ~2026-14944-70...

people Wikipedia covers. -- Taku (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Anachronist must have seen something promising in the draft because they...

that we should delete. DGG ( talk ) 19:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. No repeated submissions. It will likely eventually go per G13; if someone...

reasons. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Keep. WP:NMFD. Old G12 deletions of unrelated versions do not prejudice new draftspace...

than two times".--- Possibly (talk) 21:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD as tendentiously resubmitted, turned away 9 times with a total of 6 declines...

But lack of sources is not a valid reason to delete a draft, as per WP:NMFD. MfD is not intended to determine if a subject is "viable" by which i take...

include. CastJared (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC) Bad nomination. WP:NMFD. Drafts shouldn't be deleted just for failing to show GNG. But also, it probably...

code. There is no valid reason for deletion. It is a run of the mill WP:NMFD fail of a nomination. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC) its a declined...

now enough to establish notability is not relevant here at MFD as per WP:NMFD, but that some of them look good is a further reason to keep. No policy-based...

work in the draftspace). -- Taku (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Per WP:NMFD: Drafts may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion...

behavior or any kind of promotion. We have some guidence at WP:DIPLOMAT and WP:NMFD that applies. Legacypac (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC) Delete as the subject...

Thanks. TopCipher (talk) 17:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC) Keep per Bearcat and WP:NMFD. Some of the references are not unreasonable. I don't find the tone to be...

an already existing, and this happens to be draft space, so WP:NDRAFT/WP:NMFD would apply. — csc-1 22:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Arccosecant I'm aware of those...

Delete as advertising. Legacypac (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Draftspace is the appropriate place to prepare an article on something that...

the DCU, therefore this is unlikely to ever be a viable article as per WP:NMFD. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 04:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC) Delete: While I normally...

but this could not properly be called tendentious editing, so the new WP:NMFD does not seem to apply as a reason for deletion. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs...

Ramin Namdar etc... PRAXIDICAE💕 15:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Keep, per WP:NMFD, "Drafts are not subject to article deletion criteria like "no context,"...

drafts at MfD for notability concerns. That's why we have G13. Also see WP:NMFD SK2242 (talk) 23:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Keep - Drafts are not checked for...

a chance of meeting our notability in our current form, WP:NDRAFT and WP:NMFD are clear that notability guidelines don't apply in draft space. If anything...

for mainspace, so nominating them here is, at best, unproductive. See WP:NMFD, WP:RAGPICKING, WP:BITE etc. My sincere apologies to Bougnole: this isn't...

watch | logs)​ Unnecessary draft for an event that will not happen. Per WP:NMFD, it is textbook "unlikely to ever be a viable article" and meets WP:DEL#REASON...

Among Us for POTUS (talk) 01:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Keep. Please see WP:NMFD—drafts are not subject to mainspace's usual content standards, and because...

the neologism or essay, the latter would have been allowed to stay in WP:NMFD until multiple resubmissions. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:14, 11 February...

(UTC) Elaboration - per "it is unlikely to ever be a viable article" WP:NMFD with consensus at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_149#RfC:_Deletion_of_drafts...

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB resulted in keep because of WP:NMFD, however, this was before it was tendentiously resubmitted. Battle for Dream...

Forcing source-analysis discussions into MfD is flagrant disregard of WP:NMFD and is disruption. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC) Sometimes...

guideline.) --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Okay, then; WP:NMFD applies and that is an explanatory essay based on a standing policy. WaltCip-(talk)...

future TV channel.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Sony SAB tamil is upcoming tamil channel by Sony pictures network India...

BusterD, the essay you reference specifically notes this very process. See WP:NMFD. In 3 months, this page would be eligible for speedy deletion. « Gonzo fan2007...

be ignored. Bring stuff here only when tendentiously resubmitted (see WP:NMFD). Draftspace is noindexed and pages are impossible to find, links are nofollowed...

redirect must be considered before deletion. Debating the matter fails WP:NMFD. I support creation of registered candidate pages, with subsequent merge...

matter. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

does not especially matter (WP:NDRAFT). Per the MfD deletion policy (WP:NMFD), "A draft will be deleted at MfD if there is a consensus that it meets one...

IMO it is clearly out of date and should be revised. Also if you read WP:NMFD it clearly states that notability is not to be used as the primary concern...

reference of this person being married to a Liswati prince. I realise that WP:NMFD states that drafts should only be brought here if they have been repeatedly...

(talk) 02:58, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Weak keep (weak per my comment below) per WP:NMFD, i.e. failure to demonstrate that the topic meets notability guidelines is...

and usage. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and SmokeyJoe. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Delete this...

unlikely to ever become an article and they meet a reason for deletion (per WP:NMFD). 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:27, 30 July...

would be almost nothing encyclopedic left. Additionally, while I'm aware of NMFD, the draft has been rejected from AfC since September 2024 for lack of notability...

perhaps because it is archived. Legacypac (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC) WP:NMFD. You were the only one. Bringing notability here is disruption. --SmokeyJoe...

and is liable to eventually lead to another deletion discussion, per WP:NMFD. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC) Draft:CMG...

edge cases if we keep the obvious deletes out of MfD We need to delete WP:NMFD as misguided and an impediment to building a better encyclopedia. 2. Mainspace...

could eventually find sources to satisfy the GNG, and in any case as per WP:NMFD notability is not an issue here. I am willing to WP:AGF on the resubmisisons...

instructions at face value. Not obviously non-notable, and the question fails WP:NMFD. There is a problem. Mfd is not the answer. The answer is to firmly “Reject”...

otherwise no need to take up anyone's time with an mfd, in the absence of an WP:NMFD reason just leave for g13. Regards, 81.177.3.8 (talk) 17:11, 15 September...

time. Thegooduser Let's Chat 02:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy close per WP:NMFD, noting that the nominator doesn't advance any violation from WP:NOT. --SmokeyJoe...

done) davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Notability is not a reason to bring a draft to MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:59...

the word’s prurient. KJP1 (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Setting that aside, significant disagreement about the appropriateness of...

that will never get to mainspace with no changes for over a year, but WP:NMFD tells us notability shouldn't be a primary concern. That leaves the main...

if it fails WP:N. --AussieLegend (✉) 21:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC) See WP:NMFD and this RfC. MfD is not equipped to do an AfD-style analysis on every hopeless...

deadline. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD and Atlantic306's initial sentence. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John...

trust it won't. This is not deletable under oven the recently modified WP:NMFD. "Unsourced" is not a valid reason to delete a draft. Nor is apparent lack...

on draft deletion, including when nomination here is appropriate, see WP:NMFD Deleting pages in other people's userspace Consider explaining your concerns...

Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NMFD. Disagreements about notability can be hashed out if this is moved to the...

— jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 23:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy close per WP:NMFD. Legacypac can’t overturn an RfC in which he was massively and unanimously...

go-to in these cases is WP:NOTWEBHOST after so many resubmissions because WP:NMFD is policy (even though no one really seems to want it to be until the thought...

discussion. Earlier today a community-wide RfC was closed making changes to WP:NMFD. It closed with a pretty strong consensus, there was specific language proposed...

articles. To help provide clarity for this situation, I am proposing WP:NMFD be modified to read the following (updated text in red): Drafts are not subject...

June 2018 (UTC) DES has been busy undermining the recent RFC result on WP:NMFD which this closely relates to. At the same time as they shut down discussion...

finished clearing that backlog yesterday. We really need a new RFC. Citing WP:NMFD over and over is really not helpful and the wording there is far too stingy...

speedy is declined. In other cases, the guidance at e.g. WP:STALEDRAFT, WP:NMFD, or WP:ATD might make a listing innapropriate if something is deemed ineligible...

The RFC at the Village Pump regarding a modification of the language of WP:NMFD has been closed. The result of the discussion was that drafts may be deleted...

nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, but see WP:NMFD; the standards for article deletion are much stricter than those for draft...

experienced editors for an informal review. Due to recent revisions of WP:NMFD the rule now is that A draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined...

on draft deletion, including when nomination here is appropriate, see WP:NMFD Deleting pages in other people's userspace Consider explaining your concerns...

on draft deletion, including when nomination here is appropriate, see WP:NMFD Deleting pages in other people's userspace Consider explaining your concerns...

on draft deletion, including when nomination here is appropriate, see WP:NMFD Deleting pages in other people's userspace Consider explaining your concerns...

Concise Guide to Nine Major Faiths|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=pNmfdAKFpkQC&pg=PA36|accessdate=18 February 2013|year=2010|publisher=Penguin Books...

on draft deletion, including when nomination here is appropriate, see WP:NMFD Deleting pages in other people's userspace Consider explaining your concerns...

context. I take it that generally and solely are doing a lot of work here. WP:NMFD elaborates (emphasis added: Failure to demonstrate that the topic meets notability...

failed AfC review. BOVINEBOY2008 20:32, 14 July 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NMFD. Draftifying would just lead us back to where we are now. Vegantics (talk)...