ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia:Requests for history merge § Complex repair requests. Shortcut WP:NOATTWP:NOATT Not everything copied from one Wikipedia page to another requires attribution...

of the Main Page, it's not a fake article. As a user page, it meets WP:NOATT and does not violate WP:UP#NOT SUITED. Miniapolis 22:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT), so this will not interfere with deletion. The creator has been indefinitely...

Brennan and Mary O'Leary articles respectively) would not seem to meet WP:NOATT. Neither fragment representing "sufficient creativity". And both fragments...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT), so this does not interfere with deletion. The creator has been indefinitely...

no difference between what I said and what you feel I meant to say. WP:NOATT states that not everything requires attribution, which is directly contrary...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT). Also, the templates are organized in Category:NCAA Division III football...

positive. Same author using article as template, no attrib needed per WP:NOATT CrowCaw 22:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC) Webzine World (edit, talk, history...

times (pasted with maint tags). So I'd be ok to close this one as "per WP:NOATT". Opinions? CrowCaw 23:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Sounds good to me, Crow...

creative input to attract copy protection, per WP:NOATT. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC) NOATT references bare references, which these were...

this draft to there and then delete as unnecessary. Pretty sure per WP:NOATT that page history doesn't need to be kept for attribution in a merge scenario...

For what it's worth, "bare references" do not require attribution per WP:NOATT. However, it would be better to just keep this. In fact, I think we should...

editor (based on the page history) this doesn't need to be kept per WP:NOATT (If the re-user is the sole contributor of the text at the other page, attribution...

contents to an article or other page. Such copy-pasting is allowed by WP:NOATT if you are the sole author of the copied content. The sandbox will have...

-- Marchjuly (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC) @Marchjuly: I believe WP:NOATT applies. If so, the draft can be deleted. --NeilN talk to me 22:15, 8 January...

Meena • 09:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC) I believe that the "bare reference" in WP:NOATT means a reference with no accompanying text, rather than a bare URL. If...

admin can check the deleted article to verify this. It also seems that WP:NOATT might apply.- MrX I think confusion here is understandable. The article...

21 January 2022 (UTC) I think you're slightly mistaken on one point; WP:NOATT says If the re-user is the sole contributor of the text at the other page...

October 2018 (UTC) (pinged by Ivanvector) Hi Ivanvector, Please check WP:NOATT (WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed) Which is very...

one who's edited the pages? Abyssal (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Per WP:NOATT, "Not everything copied from one Wikipedia page to another requires attribution...

their sandbox. The copying back to the article however does not per WP:NOATT. (assuming no one else has edited in their sandbox) -DJSasso (talk) 23:44...

space who wrote/worked on the article and who copied it to main - no (WP:NOATT). If multiple editors have worked on the draft and a single editor copies...

the page, I would say it falls within existing rules, especially since WP:NOATT will apply in the event that the page is deleted, helping anyone who is...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT). As mentioned above by Lamona, 2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin is not a good...

WP:CWW says a new article like this one needs to have attribution unless WP:NOATT applies or WP:PATT is satisfied. I got into a discussion with another editor...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT). As mentioned above by Lamona, 2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin is not a good...

page is? Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC) WP:NOATT, although your example of "lizards that are commonly sold in pet shops"...

Brennan and Mary O'Leary articles respectively) would not seem to meet WP:NOATT. Neither fragment representing "sufficient creativity". And both fragments...

the page, I would say it falls within existing rules, especially since WP:NOATT will apply in the event that the page is deleted, helping anyone who is...

editor (based on the page history) this doesn't need to be kept per WP:NOATT (If the re-user is the sole contributor of the text at the other page, attribution...

WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (shortcut WP:NOATT) would likely apply. WP:Editing policy contains zero mentions of "history"...

previous revisions and the editor who copied them over to the target, so WP:NOATT would apply. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC) I ran into some...

WP:CWW says a new article like this one needs to have attribution unless WP:NOATT applies or WP:PATT is satisfied. I got into a discussion with another editor...

N Hans Martin (singer) (3 edits): (+759) Heroes (We Could Be Heroes) N NOATT cutpaste move Sennecaster (Chat) 14:58, 26 March 2025 (UTC) Brandon Beal...

N Outbreakband (3 edits): (+1421)(+191) Heroes (We Could Be) N NOATT cutpaste move mess Sennecaster (Chat) 14:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC) N Wafande...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT), so this does not interfere with deletion. The creator has been indefinitely...

situations in which we don't need to provide attribution are listed at WP:NOATT and I don't think any of them obtain.—S Marshall T/C 12:44, 10 April 2023...

times (pasted with maint tags). So I'd be ok to close this one as "per WP:NOATT". Opinions? CrowCaw 23:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Sounds good to me, Crow...

transmogrified beyond recognition. Jclemens (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC) NOATT seems to make it clear that attribution is needed if material by other contributors...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT). Also, the templates are organized in Category:NCAA Division III football...

one is more of a histmerge request which would also be declined from WP:NOATT - I'm happy to explain further on a talk page" Comments: Extremely aggressive...

with Cryptic that it would be easier to just rewrite the content, per WP:NOATT, attribution is not necessary in that case. But I also don't any harm in...

speaking, not all copying has to be attributed. The guidance on that is at WP:NOATT. Mike Turnbull (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC) Agreed with @Athanelar...

English translation here, I don't think attribution is required (see WP:NOATT). Isn't it only if other editors have written the text that's being translated...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed, guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT) and Scientelensia restoring their own previous edits, I found one edit...

transmogrified beyond recognition. Jclemens (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC) NOATT seems to make it clear that attribution is needed if material by other contributors...

WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (shortcut WP:NOATT) would likely apply. WP:Editing policy contains zero mentions of "history"...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT). Flatscan (talk) 04:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Two follow-up comments: This...

situations in which we don't need to provide attribution are listed at WP:NOATT and I don't think any of them obtain.—S Marshall T/C 12:44, 10 April 2023...

with Cryptic that it would be easier to just rewrite the content, per WP:NOATT, attribution is not necessary in that case. But I also don't any harm in...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed (guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT). Flatscan (talk) 04:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Two follow-up comments: This...

within Wikipedia#Where attribution is not needed, guideline, shortcut WP:NOATT) and Scientelensia restoring their own previous edits, I found one edit...