ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:THEREISNORUSHWP:THEREISNORUSH WP:TINDWP:TIND WP:NORUSHWP:NORUSH WP:NOHURRYWP:NOHURRY WP:DEADLINEWP:DEADLINE...

(talk) 08:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Comment Suggesting that there is WP:NORUSH and we show some WP:COMMONSENSE and simply sit on this for a fortnight or...

camp that contains two international fixtures. There was WP:NOHARM and WP:NORUSH in showing some WP:COMMONSENSE and wait a few days to see what happens before...

prod and began working on the article, the AfD was placed immediately. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Comment: I will address your...

useful for me.CptVikram•[@píng mє] 07:58, 13 August 2026 (UTC) There's WP:NORUSH. This is a noticeboard that many admins patrol. Bugging multiple admins...

reason given by nominator, I take it as a bad faith nomination, quoting WP:NORUSH. Optakeover(Talk) 16:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC) Perhaps I am misunderstanding...

and at that time we can have an article about it here. But there's WP:NORUSH, so no need to keep the article in its current form. Safehaven86 (talk)...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:NORUSH. I'm not sure exactly whether or not this article should be kept but it's...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:NORUSH, We can afford to take our time to improve articles, to wait before deleting...

as the article circulates the community. Frogzrool (talk) Delete per WP:NORUSH We can afford to take our time, to consider matters, to wait before creating...

substantive sources. Reywas92Talk 20:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH. The lack of sources in the article is not a reason for AfD. Sources exist...

at the IIHF World U18 Championship. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC) @Lightburst: NORUSH pertains to articles that likely pass GNG...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:NORUSH -- We can afford to take our time to improve articles, to wait before deleting...

transactions. I think we have enough for WP:BARE and more will follow. WP:NORUSH. Wm335td (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

deleting article only to restore in a few weeks. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH instead of Wikipedia:Waste of Time. Deleting this article only to recreate...

wikilawyer demands. The judge shakes her head: "No FORUMSHOPPING." "There is NORUSH!" argues the wikilawyer. The judge shakes her head: "The deadline is NOW...

this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is WP:NORUSH. This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's...

debut. Nominators need to show some WP:COMMONSENSE and remember there is WP:NORUSH. 23:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...

guideline. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC) WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH trump WP:NFOOTBALL. It's virtually assured we'll be undeleting the article...

deleted, would likely recreate soon. WP:COMMONSENSE suggests that there is WP:NORUSH and we can afford to wait a few weeks, and see if the article is indeed...

intent to send everything else old to MfD over the years, as there is WP:NORUSH. It's not just me involved in Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts, we'll...

the previous films has a quality article to read. I know that there is WP:NORUSH but it still put a smile on my fact to know that this has happened. Emir...

acceptable results, and number 2 was chosen. What's issue? There is WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Delete no claim to notability. Per...

the previous films has a quality article to read. I know that there is WP:NORUSH but it still put a smile on my fact to know that this has happened. Emir...

and there is WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC) And then if he doesn't play then the article hangs around. WP:NORUSH is an essay, and...

wholesale from another website, I think WP:TNT is a better choice than WP:NORUSH. This article was once Armenians social protection system: Historical Review...

November 2019 (UTC) Weak Keep it is in draft where it belongs for now. WP:NORUSH Wm335td (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

— HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC) Delete: WP:NORUSH View One. ...creating an article without establishing the basis of the content...

if it's still getting WP:SIGCOV I will support recreation. See also WP:NORUSH. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

rejection of a draft that met WP:GNG (with a clear need of expansion but WP:NORUSH), maybe one of the worst ones I have seen. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:55, 22...

Hasteur (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC) A month is plenty of time? WP:NORUSH. –Fredddie™ 01:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

nominator and 25 minutes later there was an AfD. Alacrity is not necessary. WP:NORUSH WP:SIGCOV exists LA Times, San Francisco Gate, Irish Examiner, The incident...

call-ups in a week or two, will be interesting to see - suggest also apply WP:NORUSH to see what happens. Nfitz (talk) 07:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Someone needs...

to delete - one day after the article was started we push to delete? WP:NORUSH. This is a pre-internet subject and not all sources will be WP:GHITS Wm335td...

matter if those souces are immediately added to the article, as there is WP:NORUSH. Let'srun (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) Keep Subject looks notable...

starting deletion discussions on articles like this, rather than applying WP:NORUSH and seeing what the line-up looks like. Nfitz (talk) 13:30, 26 June 2019...

deleting article only to restore in a few weeks. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH instead of Wikipedia:Waste of Time. Deleting this article only to recreate...

Maltese archives necessary to verify this, and can't wait (violating WP:NORUSH) to discuss it with the author, I don't feel you shouldn't be editing in...

this draft forever.Catfurball (talk) 19:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Keep WP:NORUSH we do not rush to delete. This was created a few days ago and there is time...

Television. Berantral (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC) Draftify WP:NORUSH, two years away from release and we haven't gotten any footage from the...

closing admin really can't wait (why not, I don't know, because there is WP:NORUSH, move to draftspace. Nfitz (talk) 03:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC) I suggest you...

the article, but that can be done over time in a WP:WIP project with WP:NORUSH. Here are the sources mentioned for convenience: -2pou (talk) 15:02, 30...

article was started yesterday. Prodded yesterday. And then AfD'd today. WP:NORUSH. The article has WP:RS and considering it is barely a day old, the nominator...

started deleted because they chose to step away for a long time. There is WP:NORUSH for the simple reason that editors are volunteers who have lives outside...

Keep for now and see if it can be made into something beyond WP:NOTDICT WP:NORUSH Wm335td (talk) 21:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC) @Wm335td:, are you saying that...

improvement though. Not sure it's a matter of WP:TOOSOON, would counter that WP:NORUSH may be a more appropriate way of thinking about it. Missjastersgarden (talk)...

current media coverage is increasing the amount of material as we speak. WP:NORUSH means that we can let this be for a few months until the situation stabilizes...

deleting article only to restore in a few weeks. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH instead of Wikipedia:Waste of Time. Deleting this article only to recreate...

forks. dci | TALK 18:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NORUSH. Once the "charm" has worn off, and people move on to the next flavor-of-the-week...

has been met, and I'll add it tot he article. I think we should apply WP:NORUSH to this. Alternatively, the article should be moved to Draft - as surely...

this one is. I have been editing all day so I needed to stop a minute. WP:NORUSH. This is a 15 year old Podcast Here is partial interview with Def Leopard's...

contribute to their expansion. But I am comforted in that regard by WP:NORUSH. I'm a member of WikiProject Skateboarding - a project with two active members...

this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is WP:NORUSH. This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's...

returns to give some more context on the image. Currently treating this as WP:NORUSH. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC) My internet access...

hundred year history so it has potential to be expanded. Cf. WP:NOTPAPER, WP:NORUSH & WP:POTENTIAL. -Arb. (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Nominating after...

go ahead and delete it, there is always WP:REFUND. On the other hand, WP:NORUSH implies that 'soon' by on-wiki standards rather than by everyday-english...

vessel, as per the various lists covering the Empire ships. There is WP:NORUSH to write the articles on the individual ships, and the redlinks do show...

Southend United F.C. in less than 6 days. I'd suggest that we apply WP:NORUSH and relist this for another week, or else we may end up draftifying it,...

material and being able to transcribe it appropriately... Good thing WP:NORUSH... -2pou (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) What exactly are you seeing...

(UTC) keep As the Turkish article isn't unsourced (not 'uncited') and WP:NORUSH still applies, I find the deletion nomination unconvincing. Andy Dingley...

you can more fully evaluate whether coverage is insufficient? There is WP:NORUSH for merging. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 13:55, 13 July 2025...

of the first team days before the season starts instead of applying WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

this list will get to the point where it is truly useful. Still, if WP:NORUSH means what it says, the incompleteness of the list is not grounds for deletion...

WP:TOOSOON there is no article until it happens . Making an article early. WP:NORUSH what is happeniong? Just trying to be first? I did not even vote, I made...

| TALK 18:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC) STRONG Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NORUSH. Once the "charm" has worn off, and people move on to the next flavor-of-the-week...

one has fleshed out the article isn't a reason for deletion, there's WP:NORUSH. —  dainomite   20:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Keep. Decline of an incorrect...

written. Wikipedia is a work in progress [4] and there is no deadline WP:NORUSH. I quote from the latter: "We can afford to take our time to improve articles...

editors must try to add more items to get closer to complete. There is WP:NORUSH. DeVerm (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC) The article gives a simplistic...

this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH and NEXIST (reliable sources exist even if not in the article) Here is one...

non-event, depending on your perspective). Under the principle of the essay WP:NORUSH, let's give this a month or three to let the facts settle. We might learn...

deleting whole sections. The "there is no deadline" is for the whole of WP. WP:NORUSH gives specific guidance over the deletion of content. I quote: "Wikipedia...

issues/removed irrelevant sourcing, there'll be some decision for this relisting. WP:NORUSH! --valereee (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC) I suggested that Usedtobecool...

11:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, I wish editors would keep in mind WP:NORUSH for these things. Within an hour of the article being created false information...

damaging is being disingenuous. As people like to often claim there is WP:NORUSH when keeping articles, the inverse is also true. There is no rush to have...

be.--Wuerzele (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC) @Wuerzele: Please see WP:NORUSH and WP:NOTFINISHED. That said, nomination for deletion can lead to vast...

2019 (UTC) Keep agree with others, don't see the point in deleting now. WP:NORUSH. The date also may be relevant to our readers. Wm335td (talk) 20:49, 2 November...

(talk) 00:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Keep - This draft belongs in draft WP:NORUSH. Lightburst (talk) 14:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC) delete (weak) - Drafts...

concerned. This is simply news, not encyclopedic content and there is WP:NORUSH. Bruxton (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Keep it's a major notable event...

be on the shy side of requisite wp:admin civility, especially given WP:NORUSH. I've now added the sources. As to nom's "otherstuff", I point him to WP:OTHERSTUFF...

thirty-two point groups" by Koster, Dimmock, Wheeler & Statz. There's WP:NORUSH for Petergans (and others) to amplify material from the sources. Mathsci...

not GNG, so there's no immediate need for deletion, and we can apply WP:NORUSH and review this without prejudice when such archives become readily available...

still not being met. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NORUSH I see that the article was recently deleted and I have read the arguments...

useful for me.CptVikram•[@píng mє] 07:58, 13 August 2026 (UTC) There's WP:NORUSH. This is a noticeboard that many admins patrol. Bugging multiple admins...

WP:TOOSOON and we are better off waiting for the game's release. There is WP:NORUSH to make an article about it. It's most likely "nobody batted an eye" simply...

wikilawyer demands. The judge shakes her head: "No FORUMSHOPPING." "There is NORUSH!" argues the wikilawyer. The judge shakes her head: "The deadline is NOW...

which could be dealt with without a greater consensus, but there is WP:NORUSH. Putting everything else on pause while we systematically prioritize and...

does not meet the WP:GNG as this is currently written. WP:TOOSOON and WP:NORUSH should be heeded. User:Let'srun 15:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) The above...

vindicated here, and I know he wasn't acting in bad faith, but some WP:AGF or WP:NORUSH toward me would have been nice. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)...

Keep for now WP:NORUSH and encourage improvements. Easily improvable and expandable. Wm335td (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC) WP:NORUSH is an essay, not...

navigational aid. Other year lists will be added eventually. There is WP:NORUSH. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC) Delete all There doesn't...

eventually. Q4 doesn't define the timeframe. I'd say that by applying the WP:NORUSH, then the appropriate timeframe to source a player like this, is when Luxembourgish...

team then I wouldn't oppose deletion. Until then I think we can apply WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC) I don't think there's any need...

Relisting per editor requesting more time to track down sources and WP:NORUSH. That said, this is the 2nd relist. I would expect that next week the reviewing...

this isn't. Lamona (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH and we will see what comes Lightburst (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)...

mean Golshan won't be notable in the future. Remember Viewpoint 1 of WP:NORUSH. There will be plenty of opportunity to develop an article for Golshan in...

Wombat (talk) 23:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NEXIST. Oy vey... WP:NORUSH. Obviously the article is not in the best shape, and it should be trimmed...

Clarityfiend (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Keep for now relevant policies WP:NORUSH and WP:NTEMP Wm335td (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC) The first is an...

determination is that this subject is notable. My point is there is time WP:NORUSH and WP:LOCALCONSENSUS may change. Sorry for the confusing !vote rational...

informational or aide in navigation. Wikipedia advises us to do so. There is WP:NORUSH - we can delete this in a few months if we are inclined. That is why I ...

contribs) 18:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC) i.e. the rationale is that there is WP:NORUSH to have these articles and mainspace is not indefinite draft space. RandomCanadian...

the articles have radical mood swings and no progressive direction. WP:NORUSH--Inayity (talk) 12:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC) Note: Here is more of what...

decent Wikipedian, however we should wait until they get more experience. WP:NORUSH does not only apply to content. Candidate also appears to refuse to answer...

even if it was merged like with a biography of Drunvalo Melchizedek. WP:NORUSH and optimistic eventualism in this case. Deletionism sucks; deletion is...

work in progress. Don't rush to edit, it's not a competition. WP:TIND, WP:NORUSH, WP:DEADLINE Mid Vague introductions Explain the subject of the article...

are to be kept. Wikipedia does not have deadlines for completion, see WP:NORUSH, and the assumption is that schools, as they are focal points for community...

eventually all the campaigns should probably have their own articles, but per WP:NORUSH I don't know how soon that'll happen. But if that's the only way to avoid...

(or not be) found. In cases like that, we can remember that there is WP:NORUSH and that Wikipedia articles are not a final draft. Ultimately access to...

involvement in the dispute. Please let the RfC run its course (there is WP:NORUSH here) and then let an uninvolved party close the discussion--it needn't...

seem to have taken as an invitation to violate 44 minutes later. There is NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC) Nobody aside from you seems to...

my taking unilateral action.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC) WP:NORUSH - this has only been open a few hours. Given them a few days, if no damage...

this to be the case. Even if it wasn't, then I think WP:COMMONSENSE,WP:NORUSH, and WP:NORULES trump WP:CRYSTAL. There's no harm to to the project by leaving...

for those threads that would benefit from it. Like, a {complicated} or {norush} tag. Levivich? ! 00:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC) I think for blocks this is...

people not liking it or it not working out as they expected, there is WP:NORUSH. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Oppose in general...

without the articles Gerda creates, I would remind them that there is WP:NORUSH to create them. Mjroots (talk) 11:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC) As per Mr rnddude...

(UTC) I see you are a new editor so I am guessing you have not read WP:NORUSH or WP:NOTNEWS. The BBC is probably right, but we are volunteer based so...

It seems that maybe Piotrus has lost patience and is resorting to A7 WP:NORUSH. The right thing normally happens to an article, it just does not always...

than a blog post for this. Presumably there will be in 24-48 hours. WP:NORUSH. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC) An additional source...

them and avoid each other until a new consensus is reached. There is WP:NORUSH to get this resolved and fixed immediately. Nihlus 05:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)...

votes on the RFC, other than my own. I withdrew my RFC because I'm very NORUSH / There is no deadline about getting an article to the "right version",...

AFDs until people can catch up would have been appropriate, recalling WP:NORUSH. I also noticed commentary he made about this ANI [87], [88] referring to...

announced. Rillington (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC) There is Wikipedia:NORUSH. Theroadislong (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2021 (UTC) True, but there's nothing...

is counter to our beliefs guidelines and policies to rush to delete. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC) Oppose partly per Levivich...

that RANS has its own Category:Russian Academy of Natural Sciences). / WP:NORUSH, WP:NOTIMELIMIT 5Q5|✉ 13:08, 17 August 2025 (UTC) It may be my imagination...

featured section - and had to search it to find it, but there is likely WP:NORUSH. I suggest withdraw the nomination until it is not an FA. - that way there...

then it doesn't exist and cannot exist. WP:IDONTLIKEIT WP:ICANTHEARYOU WP:NORUSH #leavebritneyalone #hakunamatata. — Smuckola(talk) 08:21, 7 November 2015...

vote. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH There is enough no trivial source information in this article's current...

returns to give some more context on the image. Currently treating this as WP:NORUSH. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC) My internet access...

or a few editors imagine (enforce?) some non-existent deadline. Per WP:NORUSH: "it is perfectly acceptable to let the editing process fashion an article...

editor need access to deleted content urgently? As the title of the essay WP:NORUSH goes, "There is no deadline." Lastly, and above all else, there is a legal...

a stink... well this whole project is a WP:WIP and there's honestly WP:NORUSH to completion, in my opinion, if it's actually in the queue to get done...

deleted eventually. People on both sides need to realize that there is WP:NORUSH. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 13:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Sure, support...

created was good is immaterial, I would remind everyone that there is WP:NORUSH to get the material on Wikipedia. If we go without it for a few month, years...

quality is not by itself a reason for deletion. Related to this, check WP:NORUSH. And all of this was your own opinion. But I also see from Talk:Tabarnia...

four-day-old account with 10 dummy edits has identified a topic of critical, NORUSH-superseding importance as a standalone is just not worth the burden placed...

tag for that: {{prose}}. Nothing about the proposal suggests ignoring WP:NORUSH. —swpbT go beyond 16:26, 20 December 2018 (UTC) Oppose - Can we please just...

thing. jp×g🗯️ 07:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Redirect to Ilya Sutskever per WP:NORUSH as Kfein says. Spinout can be discussed on parent article talk page should...

March 2022 (UTC) 03:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Ah, stumbled on it at 4AM: WP:NORUSH == WP:PATIENT? IveGoneAway (talk) 10:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Wait, what...

(talk) 11:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)) Hi, anonymous reader! Please see WP:NORUSH and WP:NOTNEWS. This is an encyclopedia, not a news service. Imagine it...

be a long time. Nfitz (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC) In which case NORUSH and WP:RF apply - i.e., the article can be created when sources are shown...

prod and began working on the article, the AfD was placed immediately. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Comment: I will address your...

certainly someone else will notice that, too. Take it easy, there's WP:NORUSH at Wikipedia. --CiaPan (talk) 07:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Why doesn't the...

here, just give them a chance to help you. And take it easy – there is WP:NORUSH! Happy editing! --CiaPan (talk) 09:11, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Suggestions: Differences...

road whether the subject has true long-term notability... remember, WP:NORUSH. The fact is that people are visiting this page, and I don't see a better...

vote). I'd expect it to be open for at least the rest of the week – WP:NORUSH. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC) Keep You can’t delete...

to English, so I'm quite sure we could safely put 2008 there, but ...WP:NORUSH – we better wait than err. --CiaPan (talk) 12:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC) It's...

A reviewer will look at your draft in due course. Be patient. There is NORUSH. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC) "There's a worldwide virus...

athletes have already started arriving for the games, perhaps they should WP:NORUSH and wait until the event. Nfitz (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted...

article was started yesterday. Prodded yesterday. And then AfD'd today. WP:NORUSH. The article has WP:RS and considering it is barely a day old, the nominator...

non-event, depending on your perspective). Under the principle of the essay WP:NORUSH, let's give this a month or three to let the facts settle. We might learn...

has enough reasons to be kepted as it passes WP:N. Right now there is WP:NORUSH, yet the creation of this discussion might have been rushed a bit. Prior...

contribs) 18:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC) i.e. the rationale is that there is WP:NORUSH to have these articles and mainspace is not indefinite draft space. RandomCanadian...

this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH and NEXIST (reliable sources exist even if not in the article) Here is one...

(talk) 08:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Comment Suggesting that there is WP:NORUSH and we show some WP:COMMONSENSE and simply sit on this for a fortnight or...

camp that contains two international fixtures. There was WP:NOHARM and WP:NORUSH in showing some WP:COMMONSENSE and wait a few days to see what happens before...

at the IIHF World U18 Championship. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC) @Lightburst: NORUSH pertains to articles that likely pass GNG...

12:12, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Generally wikis like enwiki are slow (WP:NORUSH), and "in the news" can be too soon to judge how relevant yet another malware...

starting deletion discussions on articles like this, rather than applying WP:NORUSH and seeing what the line-up looks like. Nfitz (talk) 13:30, 26 June 2019...

improvement though. Not sure it's a matter of WP:TOOSOON, would counter that WP:NORUSH may be a more appropriate way of thinking about it. Missjastersgarden (talk)...

substantive sources. Reywas92Talk 20:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH. The lack of sources in the article is not a reason for AfD. Sources exist...

deleting article only to restore in a few weeks. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH instead of Wikipedia:Waste of Time. Deleting this article only to recreate...

you. --CoryGlee (talk) 12:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC) @CoryGlee: See this: WP:NORUSH. :) It sometimes sounds offensive and sometimes humorous, but it helps to...

Just several hours and you get frustrated? Already?! Calm down, there's WP:NORUSH. --CiaPan (talk) 15:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC) It's not clear to me what...

up in their review queue again without major improvements. Apparently WP:NORUSH is the base law of AfC (Articles for Creation). –84.46.53.0 (talk) 16:19...

requires arguments beginning with WP:, I'll say WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NORUSH, WP:COMMONSENSE, and, most importantly, WP:DOSPAGWYA. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE)...

determination is that this subject is notable. My point is there is time WP:NORUSH and WP:LOCALCONSENSUS may change. Sorry for the confusing !vote rational...

has been met, and I'll add it tot he article. I think we should apply WP:NORUSH to this. Alternatively, the article should be moved to Draft - as surely...

deleting whole sections. The "there is no deadline" is for the whole of WP. WP:NORUSH gives specific guidance over the deletion of content. I quote: "Wikipedia...

today, for details see PewDiePie vs T-Series. The general "rule" is WP:NORUSH and wait with reports until the moving target does not more move very fast...

indexing by search engines, three months after creation. There is really NORUSH, and three months go by in no time as we are busy building the encyclopedia...

Keeping this grossly racist nomination now, doesn't preclude applying WP:NORUSH and examining it in more detail later when people are calmer, and people...

are to be kept. Wikipedia does not have deadlines for completion, see WP:NORUSH, and the assumption is that schools, as they are focal points for community...

have to understand that other editors here are volunteers, and there is WP:NORUSH to make changes to articles, so all I can suggest is that you slow down...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:NORUSH. I'm not sure exactly whether or not this article should be kept but it's...

only sourced to databases. We're talking about this article. There is WP:NORUSH to create articles, and that includes taking the time to find proper sources...

damaging is being disingenuous. As people like to often claim there is WP:NORUSH when keeping articles, the inverse is also true. There is no rush to have...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:NORUSH, We can afford to take our time to improve articles, to wait before deleting...

tricky, they have BLPPROD in addition to PROD, immediately instead of WP:NORUSH, and the TOU for an "office action". –84.46.52.152 (talk) 00:55, 22 January...

the article, but that can be done over time in a WP:WIP project with WP:NORUSH. Here are the sources mentioned for convenience: -2pou (talk) 15:02, 30...

and there is WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC) And then if he doesn't play then the article hangs around. WP:NORUSH is an essay, and...

Consensus when someone objects, Assume good faith and remember there is WP:NORUSH. Good luck & happy editing! --CiaPan (talk) 09:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC) Forgot...

still not being met. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NORUSH I see that the article was recently deleted and I have read the arguments...

Hasteur (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC) A month is plenty of time? WP:NORUSH. –Fredddie™ 01:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

acceptable results, and number 2 was chosen. What's issue? There is WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 17:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Delete no claim to notability. Per...

guideline. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC) WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH trump WP:NFOOTBALL. It's virtually assured we'll be undeleting the article...

Keeping this grossly racist nomination now, doesn't preclude applying WP:NORUSH and examining it in more detail later when people are calmer, and people...

vindicated here, and I know he wasn't acting in bad faith, but some WP:AGF or WP:NORUSH toward me would have been nice. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)...

Wombat (talk) 23:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NEXIST. Oy vey... WP:NORUSH. Obviously the article is not in the best shape, and it should be trimmed...

current media coverage is increasing the amount of material as we speak. WP:NORUSH means that we can let this be for a few months until the situation stabilizes...

material and being able to transcribe it appropriately... Good thing WP:NORUSH... -2pou (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) What exactly are you seeing...

debut. Nominators need to show some WP:COMMONSENSE and remember there is WP:NORUSH. 23:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an...

to delete - one day after the article was started we push to delete? WP:NORUSH. This is a pre-internet subject and not all sources will be WP:GHITS Wm335td...

call-ups in a week or two, will be interesting to see - suggest also apply WP:NORUSH to see what happens. Nfitz (talk) 07:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Someone needs...

forks. dci | TALK 18:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NORUSH. Once the "charm" has worn off, and people move on to the next flavor-of-the-week...

2019 (UTC) Keep agree with others, don't see the point in deleting now. WP:NORUSH. The date also may be relevant to our readers. Wm335td (talk) 20:49, 2 November...

be on the shy side of requisite wp:admin civility, especially given WP:NORUSH. I've now added the sources. As to nom's "otherstuff", I point him to WP:OTHERSTUFF...

eventually. Q4 doesn't define the timeframe. I'd say that by applying the WP:NORUSH, then the appropriate timeframe to source a player like this, is when Luxembourgish...

this list will get to the point where it is truly useful. Still, if WP:NORUSH means what it says, the incompleteness of the list is not grounds for deletion...

closing admin really can't wait (why not, I don't know, because there is WP:NORUSH, move to draftspace. Nfitz (talk) 03:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC) I suggest you...

reason given by nominator, I take it as a bad faith nomination, quoting WP:NORUSH. Optakeover(Talk) 16:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC) Perhaps I am misunderstanding...

deleting article only to restore in a few weeks. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH instead of Wikipedia:Waste of Time. Deleting this article only to recreate...

from the previous discussions, and is based on WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NORUSH, and WP:COMMONSENSE. An article on the next election is fine, I might even...

of the first team days before the season starts instead of applying WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

thirty-two point groups" by Koster, Dimmock, Wheeler & Statz. There's WP:NORUSH for Petergans (and others) to amplify material from the sources. Mathsci...

this one is. I have been editing all day so I needed to stop a minute. WP:NORUSH. This is a 15 year old Podcast Here is partial interview with Def Leopard's...

team then I wouldn't oppose deletion. Until then I think we can apply WP:NORUSH. Nfitz (talk) 14:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC) I don't think there's any need...

wholesale from another website, I think WP:TNT is a better choice than WP:NORUSH. This article was once Armenians social protection system: Historical Review...

featured section - and had to search it to find it, but there is likely WP:NORUSH. I suggest withdraw the nomination until it is not an FA. - that way there...

requires arguments beginning with WP:, I'll say WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NORUSH, WP:COMMONSENSE, and, most importantly, WP:DOSPAGWYA. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE)...

mean Golshan won't be notable in the future. Remember Viewpoint 1 of WP:NORUSH. There will be plenty of opportunity to develop an article for Golshan in...

informational or aide in navigation. Wikipedia advises us to do so. There is WP:NORUSH - we can delete this in a few months if we are inclined. That is why I ...

concerned. This is simply news, not encyclopedic content and there is WP:NORUSH. Bruxton (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Keep it's a major notable event...

if it's still getting WP:SIGCOV I will support recreation. See also WP:NORUSH. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

as the article circulates the community. Frogzrool (talk) Delete per WP:NORUSH We can afford to take our time, to consider matters, to wait before creating...

WP:TOOSOON there is no article until it happens . Making an article early. WP:NORUSH what is happeniong? Just trying to be first? I did not even vote, I made...

Relisting per editor requesting more time to track down sources and WP:NORUSH. That said, this is the 2nd relist. I would expect that next week the reviewing...

athletes have already started arriving for the games, perhaps they should WP:NORUSH and wait until the event. Nfitz (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted...

and at that time we can have an article about it here. But there's WP:NORUSH, so no need to keep the article in its current form. Safehaven86 (talk)...

Keep for now and see if it can be made into something beyond WP:NOTDICT WP:NORUSH Wm335td (talk) 21:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC) @Wm335td:, are you saying that...

this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is WP:NORUSH. This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's...

or a few editors imagine (enforce?) some non-existent deadline. Per WP:NORUSH: "it is perfectly acceptable to let the editing process fashion an article...

from the previous discussions, and is based on WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NORUSH, and WP:COMMONSENSE. An article on the next election is fine, I might even...

Clarityfiend (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC) Keep for now relevant policies WP:NORUSH and WP:NTEMP Wm335td (talk) 20:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC) The first is an...

even if it was merged like with a biography of Drunvalo Melchizedek. WP:NORUSH and optimistic eventualism in this case. Deletionism sucks; deletion is...

this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is WP:NORUSH. This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's...

Television. Berantral (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC) Draftify WP:NORUSH, two years away from release and we haven't gotten any footage from the...

be.--Wuerzele (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC) @Wuerzele: Please see WP:NORUSH and WP:NOTFINISHED. That said, nomination for deletion can lead to vast...

recreate it closer to the event. How does two links help navigation? There is NORUSH to create it now. -- Alex_21 TALK 00:12, 1 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per...

referenced suggestions waiting for responses for weeks, but I know, WP:NORUSH. Cantaloupe2 is obviously passionate about NPOV and verifiability, which...

— HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC) Delete: WP:NORUSH View One. ...creating an article without establishing the basis of the content...

only sourced to databases. We're talking about this article. There is WP:NORUSH to create articles, and that includes taking the time to find proper sources...

| TALK 18:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC) STRONG Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NORUSH. Once the "charm" has worn off, and people move on to the next flavor-of-the-week...

contribute to their expansion. But I am comforted in that regard by WP:NORUSH. I'm a member of WikiProject Skateboarding - a project with two active members...

vessel, as per the various lists covering the Empire ships. There is WP:NORUSH to write the articles on the individual ships, and the redlinks do show...

WP:TOOSOON and we are better off waiting for the game's release. There is WP:NORUSH to make an article about it. It's most likely "nobody batted an eye" simply...

deleted, would likely recreate soon. WP:COMMONSENSE suggests that there is WP:NORUSH and we can afford to wait a few weeks, and see if the article is indeed...

deleting article only to restore in a few weeks. Use WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH instead of Wikipedia:Waste of Time. Deleting this article only to recreate...

11:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, I wish editors would keep in mind WP:NORUSH for these things. Within an hour of the article being created false information...

one has fleshed out the article isn't a reason for deletion, there's WP:NORUSH. —  dainomite   20:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Keep. Decline of an incorrect...

issues/removed irrelevant sourcing, there'll be some decision for this relisting. WP:NORUSH! --valereee (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC) I suggested that Usedtobecool...

then it doesn't exist and cannot exist. WP:IDONTLIKEIT WP:ICANTHEARYOU WP:NORUSH #leavebritneyalone #hakunamatata. — Smuckola(talk) 08:21, 7 November 2015...

has enough reasons to be kepted as it passes WP:N. Right now there is WP:NORUSH, yet the creation of this discussion might have been rushed a bit. Prior...

vote. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH There is enough no trivial source information in this article's current...

discussed four days ago here, and the TOOSOON consensus won't change ASAP, cf. NORUSH. –84.46.52.63 (talk) 12:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC) (edit conflict) @Aureliojohn:...

quality is not by itself a reason for deletion. Related to this, check WP:NORUSH. And all of this was your own opinion. But I also see from Talk:Tabarnia...

written. Wikipedia is a work in progress [4] and there is no deadline WP:NORUSH. I quote from the latter: "We can afford to take our time to improve articles...

editors must try to add more items to get closer to complete. There is WP:NORUSH. DeVerm (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC) The article gives a simplistic...

transactions. I think we have enough for WP:BARE and more will follow. WP:NORUSH. Wm335td (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

hundred year history so it has potential to be expanded. Cf. WP:NOTPAPER, WP:NORUSH & WP:POTENTIAL. -Arb. (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Nominating after...

Southend United F.C. in less than 6 days. I'd suggest that we apply WP:NORUSH and relist this for another week, or else we may end up draftifying it,...

realize that tags get left on articles for years, right? You're aware of WP:NORUSH and WP:VOLUNTEER, right? Also, WP:PRODding the articles allows for any editor...

written. Wikipedia is a work in progress [13] and there is no deadline WP:NORUSH. I quote from the latter: "We can afford to take our time to improve articles...

November 2019 (UTC) Actually the discussion appears moot as we have WP:NORUSH and WP:DEADLINENOW, yes those mention articles but the arguments are the...

we could always revisit an article further down the line, as there is WP:NORUSH. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC) I mentioned the...

it certainly appears extremely likely that these articles exist. There's NORUSH - put a pin in it, and perhaps come back in a couple of decades once more...

2023 (UTC) Draftify as excessive WP:ZEAL (the negative corollary to WP:NORUSH) per Siroxo. I would argue to Oeoi that there is a better article here than...

discussion. Goethean has ample opportunity to introduce his position - we're in NORUSH: Here is the full exchange with context for the arbitrators, nothing sensational...

actually certain (WP:CRYSTAL), and we don't even need the article yet (WP:NORUSH). Lastly, the amount of fans Star Wars has does not have any bearing whatsoever...

assuming that users understand what the template means). I know there is WP:NORUSH, but it is time for someone to close this discussion by determining either...

article was started yesterday. Prodded yesterday. And then AfD'd today. WP:NORUSH. The article has WP:RS and considering it is barely a day old, the nominator...

just keep it as a matter of process, and revisit AfD at a better time, per NORUSH. Kingsif (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Weak keep, likely notable given...

I've heard of WP:TOOSOON, WP:NOTNOW, WP:NOTNOTNOW, WP:NOTQUITEYET, and WP:NORUSH, but this is the first time I've seen someone argue WP:TOOLATE. – Levivich...

actually certain (WP:CRYSTAL), and we don't even need the article yet (WP:NORUSH). Lastly, the amount of fans Star Wars has does not have any bearing whatsoever...

in death does duty end (talk) 14:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC) As per WP:NORUSH there is no harm in doing this for BuzzFeed nor other sources. Emir of Wikipedia...

actually happens) is just wasting a lot of resources. WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH would suggest that simply retaining the article for few weeks, to see if...

more" for cases with no dissent. Perhaps I'm being overly cautious and WP:NORUSH here, but there is notable dissent to that merge and the previous merge...

rules are set up to say consensus is needed to take action. Otherwise. WP:NORUSH (IK...only an essay) applies. Lightburst (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2019...

for further discussion, but they refused, invoking WP:SNOW. There is WP:NORUSH to close the AFD earlier than the prescribed 7-day period. I note the same...

can be made. If it is a Hoax or cannot be improved it will be deleted. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Under what scenario do you...

are typically on the "front line" of news media, and since there is no WP:NORUSH on Wikipedia, we should wait for more trusted new organisations to cover...

Northern Ireland is talking about this guy, he is CLEARLY notable. Also, WP:NORUSH. KarelOrHarken555 (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

the target about "trollpastas", the redirect can come back no problem. WP:NORUSH, although we should keep our redirects as accurate-to-the-material-in-the-article...

Even if this page isn't relevant, now isn't the time to delete it, per WP:NORUSH DeVosMax [ contribs • talk • created media ] 16:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)...

resolved in 24 hours, but I've always been a strong supporter of the NOTNEWS/norush philsophy and not just on ITN, but that's largely an aside to my main point...

rules are set up to say consensus is needed to take action. Otherwise. WP:NORUSH (IK...only an essay) applies. Lightburst (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2019...

say that here. We write conservatively about living people. There is WP:NORUSH. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC) Wait, the sources cited...

if this wasn't listed here. Intrisit (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC) WP:NORUSH. Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC) @Intrisit: I prefer not to presume...

right. All we participants have to do is shut up and wait patiently. WP:NORUSH, WP:VOLUNTEER, etc. Oh and since there is this whole pandemic thing going...

actually happens) is just wasting a lot of resources. WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NORUSH would suggest that simply retaining the article for few weeks, to see if...

move request result -- 65.92.247.96 (talk) 22:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC) WP:NORUSH… -2pou (talk) 22:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved as an archive...

for further discussion, but they refused, invoking WP:SNOW. There is WP:NORUSH to close the AFD earlier than the prescribed 7-day period. I note the same...

then make edits that are representative of the discussion. There is WP:NORUSH. CorporateM (Talk) 18:12, 10 July 2015 (UTC) *Dear User:CorporateM, I agree...

can be made. If it is a Hoax or cannot be improved it will be deleted. WP:NORUSH Lightburst (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Under what scenario do you...

indicate he was an actor. It now seems reliable enough to declare, although WP:NORUSH. Dl2000 (talk) 04:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Hi all. I've been taking and...

html%20sina.com.hk - Off2riorob (talk) 09:25, 18 May 2011 (UTC) There is WP:NORUSH. Super-injunctions are becoming politically controversial in the UK, and...

on the talk page. ViperFace (talk) 18:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC) MONGO WP:NORUSH applies, it can be sorted -don't make yourself ill over this. JRPG (talk)...

article. Native names are definitely worth mentioning, but there is WP:NORUSH to do so. In the interim, this redirect currently accommodates a term that...

This would be rather close to WP:SNYTH which we don't do. There is WP:NORUSH and the confirmed bands will doubtless appear in an official confirmation...

is free to create an article on the topic on their own time/schedule, WP:NORUSH. However, in the interim, people who search for "trap-a-holics" will not...

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Paradise Chronicle - WP:NORUSH. The rush to mass create these articles and the rush to mass delete them...

sources used on the Wikinews article for some additional sources.) Per WP:NORUSH, I am not proposing that we publish this story now. However, if this proof...

created any new nominations since then. Totally correct that there is WP:NORUSH to address these redirects, which is why I didn't do it all in one singular...

material does not have to happen this week, or this month for that matter, WP:NORUSH). Utopes (talk / cont) 07:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC) The above is preserved...

not GNG, so there's no immediate need for deletion, and we can apply WP:NORUSH and review this without prejudice when such archives become readily available...

can happen at any point within the next 5 days or 50 years. There is WP:NORUSH to add material to any article. But this redirect shouldn't continue to...

It's only been "unearthed" as of today, basically. Compounded with WP:NORUSH to discuss this PNR sooner. We don't "generally keep" cross namespace redirects...

wikilawyer demands. The judge shakes her head: "No FORUMSHOPPING." "There is NORUSH!" argues the wikilawyer. The judge shakes her head: "The deadline is NOW...

Borophagus (talk) 13:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Ha, no worries, and WP:NORUSH applies. It takes 100 days after the last edit until the bot will archive...

synonymous with the target itself". But doesn't need to happen now. We are in WP:NORUSH to finish it. And in the meantime, people who search for a quote, and don't...

being "free grocery stores", whenever they want to do that, there is WP:NORUSH, and then the redirect can be substantiated with content at that point....

it certainly appears extremely likely that these articles exist. There's NORUSH - put a pin in it, and perhaps come back in a couple of decades once more...

Maltese archives necessary to verify this, and can't wait (violating WP:NORUSH) to discuss it with the author, I don't feel you shouldn't be editing in...

road whether the subject has true long-term notability... remember, WP:NORUSH. The fact is that people are visiting this page, and I don't see a better...

and were able to be fixed if you just looked. But despite there being WP:NORUSH, the articles just HAD to be drafted ASAP. It can take me hours to days...

thing. jp×g🗯️ 07:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC) Redirect to Ilya Sutskever per WP:NORUSH as Kfein says. Spinout can be discussed on parent article talk page should...

I would rather us go through them in a sensible and non-rushed way (WP:NORUSH), such as holding contests to improve the notable ones while steadily nominating...

than year is that exceptional, that shouldn't be an issue at all. Also WP:NORUSH comes to mind. CNC (talk) 19:52, 26 September 2025 (UTC) Option A. In the...

just keep it as a matter of process, and revisit AfD at a better time, per NORUSH. Kingsif (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Weak keep, likely notable given...

more eyes on it. As I noted over at your subsection of the RfC, there's NORUSH. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC) The RFC's been...

become available, considering it is still WP:TOOSOON, although there is WP:NORUSH to publish an article in mainspace. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:24, 17 October...

does not meet the WP:GNG as this is currently written. WP:TOOSOON and WP:NORUSH should be heeded. User:Let'srun 15:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) The above...

It's certainly one of those situations where I appreciate that there is WP:NORUSH. SnowRise let's rap 13:40, 18 May 2025 (UTC) On a separate procedural note...

matter if those souces are immediately added to the article, as there is WP:NORUSH. Let'srun (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) Keep Subject looks notable...

and I'll advise editors to take a step back to calm down as there is WP:NORUSH, but I'd also like to point out that there is an active debate on the talk...

2023 (UTC) Draftify as excessive WP:ZEAL (the negative corollary to WP:NORUSH) per Siroxo. I would argue to Oeoi that there is a better article here than...

we could always revisit an article further down the line, as there is WP:NORUSH. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC) I mentioned the...

against the liking of DN) have asked for patience and cited the essay WP:NORUSH. Happy to continue to work on consensus building at the article's talk page...

Northern Ireland is talking about this guy, he is CLEARLY notable. Also, WP:NORUSH. KarelOrHarken555 (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

strike my comment above. Simonm223 (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC) WP:NORUSH; something may eventually be written. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:28, 17 June...

Even if this page isn't relevant, now isn't the time to delete it, per WP:NORUSH DeVosMax [ contribs • talk • created media ] 16:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)...

this isn't. Lamona (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC) Keep for now WP:NORUSH and we will see what comes Lightburst (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)...

vote). I'd expect it to be open for at least the rest of the week – WP:NORUSH. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC) Keep You can’t delete...

actually deleted. JayCubby 15:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC) @JayCubby - There is WP:NORUSH KatoKungLee (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2025 (UTC) So? It is not up to those who...

to his specific role, claimed or otherwise, vis-a-vis AATIP. Perhaps WP:NORUSH also applies here: as additional, reliable sources emerge over time, this...

backlog and closers try to close older discussions first. Second, see WP:NORUSH. Third, see WP:VOLUNTEER. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:08, 28 February...

realize that tags get left on articles for years, right? You're aware of WP:NORUSH and WP:VOLUNTEER, right? Also, WP:PRODding the articles allows for any editor...

that RANS has its own Category:Russian Academy of Natural Sciences). / WP:NORUSH, WP:NOTIMELIMIT 5Q5|✉ 13:08, 17 August 2025 (UTC) It may be my imagination...

(UTC) keep As the Turkish article isn't unsourced (not 'uncited') and WP:NORUSH still applies, I find the deletion nomination unconvincing. Andy Dingley...

navigational aid. Other year lists will be added eventually. There is WP:NORUSH. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC) Delete all There doesn't...

consensus. We should not be choosy in when consensus is followed. Still WP:NORUSH. If you think a more thorough discussion is warranted, then start one, or...

you can more fully evaluate whether coverage is insufficient? There is WP:NORUSH for merging. Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 13:55, 13 July 2025...

external sources. Please take the time to go through them – there is WP:NORUSH on Wikipedia, and it's always easier to learn from manuals than from our...

to the hardest core of the advocacy of a change in policy here that WP:NORUSH applies at least as much to policy as to local editorial issues. I know...

hours giving you space to continue editing - Remember that there is WP:NORUSH, though! We all have a responsibility to disengage when we feel that things...

disengaged because I took a Wikibreak, also keeping in mind that, per WP:NORUSH, Rome wasn't built in a day. However, recently the narrative "I see a neologism...

submitted for review, and will be reviewed when someone gets to it. WP:NORUSH. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC) This is the Teahouse...

perspective and the somewhat aggressive responses to both reviewers. There is WP:NORUSH for passing the GAN until good faith reviews suggest the content is well...

November 2023 (UTC) Vigor and swiftness ITN would do best without. There is WP:NORUSH. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC) I do think it...

between the addition of a comment and the bot signing it (15 minutes? 30? WP:NORUSH), so recent changes patrollers are able to revert/rollback even if they...

not being convinced that it was the wrong decision. Further, there is WP:NORUSH to fix this problem, though I do hope we do not lose a useful new editor...

going through to defend them - Again, please see WP:MASSNOM. There's WP:NORUSH here. People shouldn't feel like they have to pick and choose what AfD debates...

the numbers you need to form a firm consensus here, but there's really WP:NORUSH. And honestly, particularly not in this case. I doubt that one reader out...

seems to be an AboutSelf violation,] which was only responded to with WP:NORUSH Something may eventually be written [|1] . Now we're past the first NPOVN...

effort to learn the ropes and contribute constructively. Please remember WP:NORUSH. One thing that has helped me greatly as an editor over the years are to...

conduct flawless here. At the end of the day, both of you lost site of WP:NORUSH on this one. When you deleted the table content, Davey absolutely should...

this article deleted or redirected and has been very vocal but there is WP:NORUSH. Lightburst (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC) Thanks for the message @Star...

but Wikipedia is about more than sheer accuracy. I think the essay WP:NORUSH is instructive in this case; while we shouldn't be complacent, we can still...

discussed with disinterested deliberation on relevant article talk pages and WP:NORUSH. Sennalen (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Considering the policy aspect...

become available, considering it is still WP:TOOSOON, although there is WP:NORUSH to publish an article in mainspace. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:24, 17 October...

temporary draftification actually would help jps and Bon courage feel WP:NORUSH to delete what they don't like, it could be a pragmatic mitigation. There...