Search Results: Wikipedia:NOTAD


Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
Minggu, 2026-08-09 05:34:56

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Goose Egg Game (card game)
Selasa, 2025-11-18 20:55:02

meet WP:GNG, and at best, is a premature article. Probably some sort of WP:NOTAD, considering the game has a Kickstarter project up. Only independent source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rural marketing
Selasa, 2025-11-18 14:20:51

(talk) 03:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Delete: Seems to just be a violation of WP:NOTAD turned into something that reads more like a vague encyclopedia article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Foundry
Rabu, 2025-12-03 04:54:51

comment. SportingFlyer (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTAD Coolabahapple (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal resume (United States)
Sabtu, 2026-08-01 20:29:23

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per Wikipedia:NOTAD HerrHeulsuse (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete - no sources, don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freshers-Job.com
Senin, 2025-12-01 02:32:22

2017 (UTC) The article also seems to be written like a ad, violating WP:NOTAD. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 05:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Speedy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tik Tok short video
Rabu, 2025-12-03 08:04:25

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTAD, WP:OR. Fails WP:GNG and WP:N. The creator has been indef blocked before...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Auto Repair Shop Management Systems
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 22:16:43

November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. As stated, it fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTAD. --My Pants Metal (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTDIRECTORY...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East of England Broadband Network
Rabu, 2025-12-03 05:07:06

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, WP:N, WP:NOTAD and WP:UK. Promotional content in areas, as well of made-up things somewhat...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracksplit car racing
Jumat, 2026-01-09 19:40:13

written by Joosten. No independent sources found. I'd say this one fails WP:NOTAD, among other things. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 00:12, 26 January...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish Tutors Hong Kong
Minggu, 2025-11-16 01:11:08

November 2015 (UTC) Delete: If a company failed WP:N, it also usually have WP:NOTAD problem. --Thomas.Lu (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC) (Note: I am moving...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer39
Kamis, 2026-01-08 16:40:01

minor papers, raises money for notable companies, advertorial, scream WP:NOTAD, look it just isnt WP:N. maybe in the future.Boomgaylove (talk) 00:00, 22...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sports clubs named after a sponsor
Senin, 2025-12-15 04:00:08

Would the policies at WP:SAL assist you in that? @Joseph2302:, It's not a NOTAD case, its just a collection of clubs that changed their name after a sponsor...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ucodelite
Senin, 2025-12-22 10:43:15

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NSOFT (more broadly, GNG) and has some NOTAD plus not NPOV language. BEFORE search turns up no possible reliable sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cram.com
Senin, 2025-12-01 00:17:22

og síðan flett í gegnum spjöldin í tölvunni. Það sem meira er, þú getur notað spjaldskrárlista sem aðrir hafa sett saman og sparar þér því alla vinnuna...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LocalBitcoins (2nd nomination)
Minggu, 2025-11-23 14:31:51

advertising is irrelevant in this case, since nothing in the article violates WP:NOTAD. That WP:GNG is only a guideline is not a reason to ignore it. --Joshua...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive235
Selasa, 2025-01-21 01:58:18

construct a page for his company. Again, Advertising and Marketing. WP:NOTAD. The fact that you are ignorant of the relevant policy is really quite meaningless...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 February 18
Selasa, 2022-04-05 17:01:04

minor papers, raises money for notable companies, advertorial, scream WP:NOTAD, look it just isnt WP:N. maybe in the future.Boomgaylove (talk) 00:00, 22...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 10
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:07:22

(talk) 03:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Delete: Seems to just be a violation of WP:NOTAD turned into something that reads more like a vague encyclopedia article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:22:16

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, WP:N, WP:NOTAD and WP:UK. Promotional content in areas, as well of made-up things somewhat...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:08:54

meet WP:GNG, and at best, is a premature article. Probably some sort of WP:NOTAD, considering the game has a Kickstarter project up. Only independent source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 October 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:32:14

2017 (UTC) The article also seems to be written like a ad, violating WP:NOTAD. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 05:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Speedy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:51:47

og síðan flett í gegnum spjöldin í tölvunni. Það sem meira er, þú getur notað spjaldskrárlista sem aðrir hafa sett saman og sparar þér því alla vinnuna...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 31
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:18:38

advertising is irrelevant in this case, since nothing in the article violates WP:NOTAD. That WP:GNG is only a guideline is not a reason to ignore it. --Joshua...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:13:42

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTAD, WP:OR. Fails WP:GNG and WP:N. The creator has been indef blocked before...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 19
Senin, 2022-03-28 17:54:11

Would the policies at WP:SAL assist you in that? @Joseph2302:, It's not a NOTAD case, its just a collection of clubs that changed their name after a sponsor...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:22:48

comment. SportingFlyer (talk) 01:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTAD Coolabahapple (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 18
Minggu, 2021-11-28 04:58:24

November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. As stated, it fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTAD. --My Pants Metal (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTDIRECTORY...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 January 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:44:19

written by Joosten. No independent sources found. I'd say this one fails WP:NOTAD, among other things. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 00:12, 26 January...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:31:12

November 2015 (UTC) Delete: If a company failed WP:N, it also usually have WP:NOTAD problem. --Thomas.Lu (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC) (Note: I am moving...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 July 25
Minggu, 2026-08-02 13:48:46

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per Wikipedia:NOTAD HerrHeulsuse (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete - no sources, don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 17
Kamis, 2024-04-25 20:55:14

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails NSOFT (more broadly, GNG) and has some NOTAD plus not NPOV language. BEFORE search turns up no possible reliable sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1211
Selasa, 2024-10-01 04:45:32

adding promotional content to the article, which is in violation of WP:NOTAD. And, by the way, other companies don't add information to the article,...

Click to read more »