ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

also refer to: Wikipedia:Persondata Wikipedia:Database reports Wikipedia:NOTDB This page is a list of project pages associated with the same title or shortcut...

Square Thing (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Please could you address WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST concerns. For example, where are the independent, non-database...

JSTOR · TWL) I propose merging to Urban agglomerations in India because of WP:NOTDB. A cut-off at a million is chosen for no set reason, and there is nothing...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

been open a month and I see two main point of disagreements: a) Whether WP:NOTDB applies and b) Whether there is sufficient sourcing to be able to improve...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB. No analysis or summary is offered; the article is just a long bulleted...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No explanation of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:12, 12 September...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:25, 12...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

additional coverage in reliable sources, only passing mentions. Essentially NOTDB vio, aside from the two unsourced sentences in the lead. QuietHere (talk...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB makes it so that lists that are WP:FORK'd from other lists, just to be arranged...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTDB this is a one-of-a-kind list of the 110th Congress (2007-2009). It was created...

WP:NLIST. I have not found significant coverage of this topic. Also fails WP:NOTDB; including all of the results for all of the mayoral elections would make...

and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and failing WP:NLIST for lack of secondary WP:SIGCOV (this has not been...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB|. If the reader wants all the Rajya Sabha members that've ever served, they...

Virginia judicial election articles for 1978, 1980, and 1982 all fail WP:NOTDB. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

fails GNG. NP2026 (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB issue, which also probably fails WP:GNG. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:20, 1...

Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:07, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

2025 (UTC) Once again, Wikipedia is not about everything. Along with that, NOTDB says that Wikipedia is not a collection of data for something like this...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

fails GNG. NP2026 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:NOTDB, fails GNG, and why the heck would anyone care about a list of six-man football...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST HerrHeulsuse (talk) 13:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From a contested PROD. Per WP:NOTDB, this is a collection of information that belongs in quite a few other pages...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Also fails WP:NOTDB. I would also support a redirect to Badminton at the 1975 SEAP Games. Sportsfan...

August 2025 (UTC) Delete Interesting? Yes. Encyclopedic? No. BADFORK, and NOTDB, given that there are no sources talking about the subject. And I'm not...

Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Fails WP:NLIST. Some parts of the whole statistics...

because it is the only squad list for a Sultan Azlan Shah Cup year page. WP:NOTDB may apply as well, and I am not opposed to deletion either – the creator...

Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:17, 12...

material. Oaktree b (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC) Delete not notable, WP:NOTDB, not human-written (almost certainly unreviewed LLM-generated content):...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:19, 12...

Lists. QuietCicada chirp 13:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB. This is much more suited for something like TV Tropes. ~ Matthewrb Let's...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Indirect statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:08, 12 September...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 13:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

contribs) 15:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Delete under WP:CROSSCAT and WP:NOTDB -- This exactly the kind of complex, intersectional list that makes it so...

Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:10, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Sofia-province. NP2026 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

propose merging to List of states and union territories of India because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Indian states by a numeral characteristic, which is not...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I don't see what a redirect would solve, since a full list of songs is...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Delete per precedent at C.D. Primeiro de Agosto past squads. This fails WP:NOTDB and doesn't meet WP:NLIST. Toadspike [Talk] 10:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)...

helpful.  // Timothy :: talk  14:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Delete by NLIST or NOTDB. Less detailed tables would have worked with a detailed article on the MATA...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Stated inclusion criteria does not match title. mikeblas (talk) 15:26,...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weak statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:04, 12 September...

article, even if it was notable. It seems to come under WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDB. There are 1000+ articles about individual Indian train services (though...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 16:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Significant referencing problems. mikeblas (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2024...

existing by itself is not a good page for our readers for various reasons. WP:NOTDB means that random lists should not exist on Wikipedia, because it is not...

existing by itself is not a good page for our readers for various reasons. WP:NOTDB means that random lists should not exist on Wikipedia, because it is not...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

It is debatable how relevant this information would be anyway as per WP:NOTDB. ElooB (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

significant coverages, they are all superficial. It fails WP:GNG, also WP:NOTDB. Nihonjinatny (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weak statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:29, 12 September...

Felinaex (purr / pawprints) 18:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a failure of WP:NOTDB, containing no prose context; and as wholly redundant in scope to Religions...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

is notable. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB clearly random trivia with no real importantce Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:10...

except a list of tour dates, which are not inherently worth keeping per WP:NOTDB. Astaire (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weakly defined inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 14:05, 12 September...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Delete. NOTDB, NOTINDISCRIMINATE. These are simply mirrors of primary corporate sources...

scenario. I do not believe this topic is notable and does not comply with WP:NOTDB. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Delete. This article reads...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTSTATS, this should be deleted. This is the type of things you...

17:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Delete This strikes me as a failure of WP:NOTDB, since the sourcing is all to state minimum standards and none of the sources...

restructured, but the subject easily passes WP:GNG and I don't see it failing WP:NOTDB or any other part of WP:NOT. --Richard Yin (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2024...

editor. Fails almost everything: WP:GNG, WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTDB , WP:SYNTH and perhaps a few more. A brief discussion at WikiProject Physics...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possibility fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDB as the article is just his motorsports results with a low amount of sources...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No inclusion criteria, very weak referencing. mikeblas (talk) 14:43, 12...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

notability (only other sources I could find were primary source interviews) + NOTDB vio. PROD rejected due to number of incoming links, but I don't see why...

list is accurate. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and per criteria for WP:NLIST. Subject is not discussed as a group or set...

buttons. So this article is just duplicating an external dataset. Per WP:NOTDB, this list article adds nothing. It shouldn't have been added to the original...

and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDB Traumnovelle (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

China (specifically [[Provinces of China#List of provinces|]]) because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Chinese provinces by a numeral characteristic, which is...

as the content of the lists aren't notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Other problems exist: Verifiability varies, but many of these are poorly...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weakly defined inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 14:19, 12 September...

WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is the equivalent of copying down all the cities in the airline's...

Brickyard_400#Past_winners. Combining this information in a massive list violates WP:NOTDB. Carson Wentz (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Keep; while there are...

that AfD). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per NOTDB. Did consider a redirect yet the name is too confusing. gidonb (talk) 23:44...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Weakly stated inclusion criteria does not match title. mikeblas (talk)...

existing by itself is not a good page for our readers for various reasons. WP:NOTDB means that random lists should not exist on Wikipedia, because it is not...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From a contested PROD. Per WP:NOTDB, this is a collection of information that belongs in quite a few other pages...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Contains only events since the end of 2019, only concerts. Completely unreferenced...

(talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by HerrHeulsuse (t · c): WP:DUP, WP:NOPAGE, WP:NOTDB Categories for discussion 12 Aug 2026 – Category:Kuwait user templates...

salting. Nate • (chatter) 23:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB, and MrSchimf's comments above. Also, is it starting to snow in here? ~...

✎ 18:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Delete. The list of songs falls under WP:NOTDB and the rest of it can go in 2024 Democratic National Convention. Astaire...

(talk) 09:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: Per nom, but also because WP:NOTDB. This definitely leans more into an indiscriminate list of Pinterest-related...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

(talk · edit · hist) was PRODed by HerrHeulsuse (t · c): WP:DUP, WP:NOPAGE, WP:NOTDB Categories for discussion 12 Aug 2026 – Category:Kuwait user templates...

meet NLIST if we are presuming the title to be a qualifyer, violation of NOTDB otherwise. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC) So, I can merge...

debate camps which definitely does not belong in the encyclopaedia (WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY). However, it could become an actual article. I am seeing...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The reason why this list is WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTDB and WP:CRIME, for some major Nazi Party figures (per WP:NLIST and WP:GNG)...

(Talk) 12:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Delete. This is a clear example of WP:NOTDB. To know where Lion Air and its subsidiaries are flying as of August 2024...

to merge the lead but the the full list of awards is a violation of WP:NOTDB and doesn't pass WP:NLIST. (I'll note that the aforementioned proposal wasn't...

large fanbase. - Altenmann >talk 13:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Delete, per WP:NOTDB. Even the wikipedia "article" (sub-section of a larger article) has a very...

assuming it was still on offer in August 2024. I agree that WP:IINFO/WP:NOTDB is probably a bigger issue. FOARP (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Delete...

article. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: Wikipedia:NOTDB - doesn't meet WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC. — ERcheck (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)...

Olympians" meets WP:NLIST while being compliant with WP:NOT (and its subunits WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIR). The wording of these guideline has, regrettably, been wikilawyered...

encyclopedic topic and more an editorialized aggregation of negative material. WP:NOTDB – The article increasingly resembles an indiscriminate catalog of statements...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in...

User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 13:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just a collection of passenger data for a few random years. It...

China (specifically [[Provinces of China#List of provinces|]]) because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Chinese provinces by a numeral characteristic, which is...

(talk) 16:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Delete the list of destinations. Per WP:NOTDB we shouldn't be maintaining a database of every place this airline has flown...

everything on this page. FOARP (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is no more than Emirates SkyCargo's destination map in list form....

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely unencyclopedic article, pretty clear case of WP:NOTDB. Seems like something that should be on wikivoyage. OrbitalVoid49 (talk)...

(talk) 02:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOR, WP:LISTN, WP:NOTDB. Far too open-ended and undefined to be a proper list. Attempts to make...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

merged into the actor's article. I think it violates WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTDB since most of the arguments in favour of keeping the article can be seen...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

context-less list of names and ages of the dead, which runs afoul of WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. There's been a long tradition of not keeping lists like...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a mirror of airline databases like FlightConnections...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

JSTOR · TWL) I propose merging to Urban agglomerations in India because of WP:NOTDB. A cut-off at a million is chosen for no set reason, and there is nothing...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

about this series. This shouldn't even be renamed to a series because of WP:NOTDB, so we shouldn't immediately try to be as inclusive as possible. This is...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, concerning WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOTDB issues. Absolutiva 01:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

seems to me this is a valid yet excessively detailed list that fails WP:NOTDB on its face but is also a valid list, so I'm not really sure what to suggest...

please place my !vote firmly in the delete column under WP:NOTMEMORIAL and NOTDB. There is simply no policy basis for these articles to have been created...

December 2025 (UTC) Delete this article. It is a patent violation of WP:NOTDB, and has accuracy concerns to boot: it does not appear to accurately reflect...

should stay as Bills-Titans rivalry per WP:NOTDB. NotJamestack (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTDB isn't a disqualifier for such a change. It...

encyclopedic JuniperChill (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTADVERT. MK at your service. 03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) (To be clear...

setting the precedent of adding a non-noteble topic will make Wikipedia:NOTDB problems in the future. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC) I...

Square Thing (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Please could you address WP:NOTDB and WP:NLIST concerns. For example, where are the independent, non-database...

showcasing of unreferenced planned events, products, or releases Raw data WP:NOTDB WP:RAWDATA The indiscriminate listing of data Directory WP:NOTDIRECTORY...

this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I'm unconvinced by the sources offered above. What we have here is a random...

March 2024 (UTC) Delete as egregious eclipse cruft. And if you like, per WP:NOTDB and as a WP:CROSSCAT. Does it matter if an eclipse 1000 years ago was visible...

with barely any substance. "Series" articles are flawed at best, and WP:NOTDB at the most egregious. Rivalry articles should and do tell a story about...

unexplained statistics", or an "exhaustive log of software updates" (what NOTDB applies to)? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC) With the present...

However, even if we discontinue this practice, we are still left with the NOTDB argument, which is my main argument. Sunnya343 (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2024...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. mikeblas (talk) 16:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

JSTOR · TWL) I propose merging to Urban agglomerations in India because of WP:NOTDB. A cut-off at a million is chosen for no set reason, and there is nothing...

database can be reliable and provide in-depth information. What the WP:NOTDB policy says to avoid is Statistics that lack context or explanation. And...

deleted outright. Reywas92Talk 23:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just the airline's route map in list form. Also an exhaustive list...

article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTDB; Wikipedia is not a repository for bibliographical data. The issue of notability...

specific coverage on the game individually. Might as well be a failure at WP:NOTDB as well. Propose re-establishing the redirect back to List of Roblox games...

(UTC) Delete, first because it seems to not pass WP:NLIST, but also per WP:NOTDB type of concerns. Also telling here is the sole opening prose of this list:...

policy/guideline perspective. Arguments for Option 1 are grounded in GNG and NOTDB, a notability guideline and policy, respectively. Option 2's arguments are...

existing by itself is not a good page for our readers for various reasons. WP:NOTDB means that random lists should not exist on Wikipedia, because it is not...

aside "...and I believe the intersection of lists of sportspeople with NOTDB is ripe for a community-wide RfC". Creating an RfC focused on one specific...

said about a place other than its name, coordinates, and population. WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTEVERYTHING apply here. If more information can be found about...

presence of that prose does not change the fact that the list goes against WP:NOTDB. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Keep - The list mentioned also...

to be a list of "people named in file", which would also make this a WP:NOTDB reason to delete. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2026...

August 2025 (UTC) list of members seems particularly egregious. see WP:NOTDB, but most of the individuals listed are not notable by themselves. Bluethricecreamman...

been open a month and I see two main point of disagreements: a) Whether WP:NOTDB applies and b) Whether there is sufficient sourcing to be able to improve...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

context with explanations from RS; I would thus recommend removing it per WP:NOTDB. Removed. EF5 20:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC) The sectioning could use improvement:...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB|. If the reader wants all the Rajya Sabha members that've ever served, they...

generally argued that the lists are unencyclopedic per WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTDB, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY; that they regularly include unverified information;...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. -- mikeblas (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

fails GNG. NP2026 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nomination, WP:NOTDB. MitYehor📘^talk 08:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

as the content of the lists aren't notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. Other problems exist: Verifiability varies, but many of these are poorly...

2025 (UTC) Once again, Wikipedia is not about everything. Along with that, NOTDB says that Wikipedia is not a collection of data for something like this...

Virginia judicial election articles for 1978, 1980, and 1982 all fail WP:NOTDB. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I don't see what a redirect would solve, since a full list of songs is...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB, if the reader wants an encyclopedic list of Serbian localities, then can...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Delete. NOTDB, NOTINDISCRIMINATE. These are simply mirrors of primary corporate sources...

created as a redirect in mainspace, this is a violation of WP:V. Based on WP:NOTDB, the policy page that Wikipedia should not be hosting unexplained, indiscriminate...

should stay as Bills-Titans rivalry per WP:NOTDB. NotJamestack (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTDB isn't a disqualifier for such a change. It...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Largely unencyclopedic article, pretty clear case of WP:NOTDB. Seems like something that should be on wikivoyage. OrbitalVoid49 (talk)...

additional coverage in reliable sources, only passing mentions. Essentially NOTDB vio, aside from the two unsourced sentences in the lead. QuietHere (talk...

of data taken from airline and airport websites doesn't run afoul of WP:NOTDB. If this standard can't be met for an airport, its table should be replaced...

Olympians" meets WP:NLIST while being compliant with WP:NOT (and its subunits WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIR). The wording of these guideline has, regrettably, been wikilawyered...

deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTDB this is a one-of-a-kind list of the 110th Congress (2007-2009). It was created...

WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is the equivalent of copying down all the cities in the airline's...

this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. I'm unconvinced by the sources offered above. What we have here is a random...

source as a "not-look-dubious media outlet", so please, read WP:DUE & WP:NOTDB. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2024 (UTC) Lack of inclusion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) From a contested PROD. Per WP:NOTDB, this is a collection of information that belongs in quite a few other pages...

merged into the actor's article. I think it violates WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTDB since most of the arguments in favour of keeping the article can be seen...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Also fails WP:NOTDB. I would also support a redirect to Badminton at the 1975 SEAP Games. Sportsfan...

it alphabetically. Regardless, these types are not allowed because of WP:NOTDB| A merge into the main list would be useless, there's nothing useful to...

the intent of the proposal is "anglocentrism". I personally see it as WP:NOTDB issue. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC) @Edward-Woodrow...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB. No analysis or summary is offered; the article is just a long bulleted...

sources (without necessarily citing them though) into this one table. WP:NOTDB is to stop you from just copy-pasting statistics from wherever into articles...

everything on this page. FOARP (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is no more than Emirates SkyCargo's destination map in list form....

WP:NLIST. I have not found significant coverage of this topic. Also fails WP:NOTDB; including all of the results for all of the mayoral elections would make...

Felinaex (purr / pawprints) 18:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a failure of WP:NOTDB, containing no prose context; and as wholly redundant in scope to Religions...

presence of that prose does not change the fact that the list goes against WP:NOTDB. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Keep - The list mentioned also...

please place my !vote firmly in the delete column under WP:NOTMEMORIAL and NOTDB. There is simply no policy basis for these articles to have been created...

explanatory advice, analogous to the non-bolded text in the other elements of the NOTDB list. It is not the actual thing that is disallowed by the policy. The thing...

is notable. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB clearly random trivia with no real importantce Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:10...

to be a list of "people named in file", which would also make this a WP:NOTDB reason to delete. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2026...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDB issue, which also probably fails WP:GNG. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:20, 1...

material. Oaktree b (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC) Delete not notable, WP:NOTDB, not human-written (almost certainly unreviewed LLM-generated content):...

that AfD). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per NOTDB. Did consider a redirect yet the name is too confusing. gidonb (talk) 23:44...

unexplained statistics", or an "exhaustive log of software updates" (what NOTDB applies to)? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC) With the present...

(Talk) 12:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Delete. This is a clear example of WP:NOTDB. To know where Lion Air and its subsidiaries are flying as of August 2024...

database can be reliable and provide in-depth information. What the WP:NOTDB policy says to avoid is Statistics that lack context or explanation. And...

list is accurate. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and per criteria for WP:NLIST. Subject is not discussed as a group or set...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTSTATS, this should be deleted. This is the type of things you...

17:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Delete This strikes me as a failure of WP:NOTDB, since the sourcing is all to state minimum standards and none of the sources...

debate camps which definitely does not belong in the encyclopaedia (WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY). However, it could become an actual article. I am seeing...

Brickyard_400#Past_winners. Combining this information in a massive list violates WP:NOTDB. Carson Wentz (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Keep; while there are...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in...

(talk) 09:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC) Delete: Per nom, but also because WP:NOTDB. This definitely leans more into an indiscriminate list of Pinterest-related...

propose merging to List of states and union territories of India because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Indian states by a numeral characteristic, which is not...

significant coverages, they are all superficial. It fails WP:GNG, also WP:NOTDB. Nihonjinatny (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...

to one or two specific databases, violating WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT, and WP:NOTDB. I looked at a randomly selected subset and they were all of the exact form:...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possibility fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDB as the article is just his motorsports results with a low amount of sources...

Thryduulf (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC) No per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDB. These are things that change all the time. There are websites which do...

restructured, but the subject easily passes WP:GNG and I don't see it failing WP:NOTDB or any other part of WP:NOT. --Richard Yin (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2024...

assuming it was still on offer in August 2024. I agree that WP:IINFO/WP:NOTDB is probably a bigger issue. FOARP (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Delete...

August 2025 (UTC) list of members seems particularly egregious. see WP:NOTDB, but most of the individuals listed are not notable by themselves. Bluethricecreamman...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Fails WP:NLIST. Some parts of the whole statistics...

It is debatable how relevant this information would be anyway as per WP:NOTDB. ElooB (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Lists. QuietCicada chirp 13:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB. This is much more suited for something like TV Tropes. ~ Matthewrb Let's...

Delete per precedent at C.D. Primeiro de Agosto past squads. This fails WP:NOTDB and doesn't meet WP:NLIST. Toadspike [Talk] 10:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)...

there was coverage, I'm guessing it would be a speedy delete per WP:NOT/WP:NOTDB/WP:NOTPROMO/WP:NOTWHOSWHO/WP:BLP1E/WP:LOWPROFILE. If the media cared enough...

August 2025 (UTC) Delete Interesting? Yes. Encyclopedic? No. BADFORK, and NOTDB, given that there are no sources talking about the subject. And I'm not...

except a list of tour dates, which are not inherently worth keeping per WP:NOTDB. Astaire (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

specific coverage on the game individually. Might as well be a failure at WP:NOTDB as well. Propose re-establishing the redirect back to List of Roblox games...

March 2024 (UTC) Delete as egregious eclipse cruft. And if you like, per WP:NOTDB and as a WP:CROSSCAT. Does it matter if an eclipse 1000 years ago was visible...

(UTC) Delete, first because it seems to not pass WP:NLIST, but also per WP:NOTDB type of concerns. Also telling here is the sole opening prose of this list:...

article. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: Wikipedia:NOTDB - doesn't meet WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC. — ERcheck (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)...

salting. Nate • (chatter) 23:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per NLIST and NOTDB, and MrSchimf's comments above. Also, is it starting to snow in here? ~...

and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTDB and failing WP:NLIST for lack of secondary WP:SIGCOV (this has not been...

notability (only other sources I could find were primary source interviews) + NOTDB vio. PROD rejected due to number of incoming links, but I don't see why...

contribs) 15:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Delete under WP:CROSSCAT and WP:NOTDB -- This exactly the kind of complex, intersectional list that makes it so...

WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a mirror of airline databases like FlightConnections...

because it is the only squad list for a Sultan Azlan Shah Cup year page. WP:NOTDB may apply as well, and I am not opposed to deletion either – the creator...

to merge the lead but the the full list of awards is a violation of WP:NOTDB and doesn't pass WP:NLIST. (I'll note that the aforementioned proposal wasn't...

meet NLIST if we are presuming the title to be a qualifyer, violation of NOTDB otherwise. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC) So, I can merge...

January 2025 (UTC) yeah wtf that's def WP:BLPCRIME issue... honestly also WP:NOTDB issue too Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC) they were...

deleted outright. Reywas92Talk 23:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just the airline's route map in list form. Also an exhaustive list...

(talk) 02:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOR, WP:LISTN, WP:NOTDB. Far too open-ended and undefined to be a proper list. Attempts to make...

However, even if we discontinue this practice, we are still left with the NOTDB argument, which is my main argument. Sunnya343 (talk) 16:33, 22 March 2024...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:NOTDB, fails GNG, and why the heck would anyone care about a list of six-man football...

article, even if it was notable. It seems to come under WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTDB. There are 1000+ articles about individual Indian train services (though...

helpful.  // Timothy :: talk  14:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Delete by NLIST or NOTDB. Less detailed tables would have worked with a detailed article on the MATA...

context-less list of names and ages of the dead, which runs afoul of WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. There's been a long tradition of not keeping lists like...

(UTC) Should we consider taking both articles to WP:AFD then due to WP:NOTDB, as you suggested on talk? Or should we try to narrow their coverage first...

editor. Fails almost everything: WP:GNG, WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTDB , WP:SYNTH and perhaps a few more. A brief discussion at WikiProject Physics...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The reason why this list is WP:LISTCRUFT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTDB and WP:CRIME, for some major Nazi Party figures (per WP:NLIST and WP:GNG)...

as the content of the list is not notable as a group. Seems to fail WP:NOTDB. No specific statement of inclusion criteria. mikeblas (talk) 16:19, 12...

encyclopedic JuniperChill (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTADVERT. MK at your service. 03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC) (To be clear...

alternate solution. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC) NOTDB requires the context to be from independent sources. Almost all of the prose...

with barely any substance. "Series" articles are flawed at best, and WP:NOTDB at the most egregious. Rivalry articles should and do tell a story about...

and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDB Traumnovelle (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

wouldn't be notable under GNG is likely a combination of WP:NOTDIC, WP:NOTDB, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and WP:5P1. The problem is that all of those are mostly...

scenario. I do not believe this topic is notable and does not comply with WP:NOTDB. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Delete. This article reads...

December 2025 (UTC) Delete this article. It is a patent violation of WP:NOTDB, and has accuracy concerns to boot: it does not appear to accurately reflect...

China (specifically [[Provinces of China#List of provinces|]]) because WP:NOTDB. This just lists Chinese provinces by a numeral characteristic, which is...

context with explanations from RS; I would thus recommend removing it per WP:NOTDB. Removed. EF5 20:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC) The sectioning could use improvement:...

✎ 18:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC) Delete. The list of songs falls under WP:NOTDB and the rest of it can go in 2024 Democratic National Convention. Astaire...

setting the precedent of adding a non-noteble topic will make Wikipedia:NOTDB problems in the future. Mikeycdiamond (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC) I...

User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 13:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDB. This is just a collection of passenger data for a few random years. It...

explanatory advice, analogous to the non-bolded text in the other elements of the NOTDB list. It is not the actual thing that is disallowed by the policy. The thing...

seems to me this is a valid yet excessively detailed list that fails WP:NOTDB on its face but is also a valid list, so I'm not really sure what to suggest...

said about a place other than its name, coordinates, and population. WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTEVERYTHING apply here. If more information can be found about...

In my mind as much information as possible should be there (within WP:NOTDB reason, obviously)—but the policy of no own research (and un-cited info...

article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTDB; Wikipedia is not a repository for bibliographical data. The issue of notability...

buttons. So this article is just duplicating an external dataset. Per WP:NOTDB, this list article adds nothing. It shouldn't have been added to the original...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, concerning WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOTDB issues. Absolutiva 01:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

encyclopedic value as to override our policies on indiscriminate info, NOTDB, BALANCE, NOTNEWS, and OR. WP:BALANCE is part of NPOV WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NPOV...

in my closure recommended a community-wide RfC about the intersection of NOTDB and NOTDIR with lists of sportspeople. I also explicitly noted that there...

irrelevant. Basically violations of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTDB, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTNEWS. Despite reverts with proper...

become exhaustive under that criteria, and would violate WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTDB. I'm not sure what the solution is there, but it should start with discussion...

there was coverage, I'm guessing it would be a speedy delete per WP:NOT/WP:NOTDB/WP:NOTPROMO/WP:NOTWHOSWHO/WP:BLP1E/WP:LOWPROFILE. If the media cared enough...

class, as a lot of information in the article might be in violation of WP:NOTDB and should be sourced to secondary independent sources. Additionally, not...

to one or two specific databases, violating WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT, and WP:NOTDB. I looked at a randomly selected subset and they were all of the exact form:...