ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for more details.) Shortcuts WP:NOTGOSSIPWP:NOTGOSSIP WP:NOTDIARYWP:NOTDIARY Celebrity gossip and diaries. Even when an individual...

two celebrities. Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTSCANDAL Hkfilmbuff (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Keep, WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTSCANDAL are not the excuses...

WP:NEWSORGS but are instead just blogs, especially odialive.com, and 3) the WP:NOTGOSSIP nature of the pieces. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)...

itself with facts Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOTGOSSIP. None of these claims are supported by reliable sources. Funny Pika! 17:19...

ROBLOX (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wikipedia is WP:NOTGOSSIP. We do not spread rumors or myths about other subjects like this. Jalen...

and the merge. PackMecEng (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTGOSSIP, fails WP:N and may even be WP:POVFORK - pick one. It's gossip based on...

Delete per nom. Me5000 (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Rapper disputes are as interesting as any other neighbourhood disputes...

This section probably doesn't violate either WP:BLP, exactly, or WP:NOTGOSSIP, exactly, but it sure does skirt close to it. Beyond that, it just sucks...

and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Lacks high-quality coverage, WP:1E is also relevant. Kelob2678 (talk)...

JSTOR · TWL) Although the subject is deceased, I think this falls under WP:NOTGOSSIP. This article appears to be a collection of rumors written in an unencyclopedic...

redirect could be an option too. Other events listed in the page fail WP:NOTGOSSIP. Underpaid Intern (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

albums under a label, etc. There is a "controversy" which is basically WP:NOTGOSSIP. CNMall41 (talk) 20:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:N and violates WP:PROMO/WP:NPOV, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and WP:OR. scope_creepTalk 23:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

though. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTGOSSIP. We are in tabloid territory when we are writing about fashion trends...

Wikipedia policies all detailed at WP:NOT (namely WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and especially WP:RUMOUR, since none of the parties involved have confirmed...

telling that this is the only "Rumors about <whatever>"[1] page WP has. WP:NOTGOSSIP (1&3). Anything usefull can be merged to Misinformation and rumors about...

just a rumour with nothing to back it. Possibly also creeping into WP:NOTGOSSIP violation. Couple sources worth a mention at parent article. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping>...

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Delete, including per WP:NOTGOSSIP/WP:NOTDIARY, which encourages us to exclude coverage of gossip and trivia...

from smaller entertainment websites is generally trivial. See also WP:NOTGOSSIP. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC) Delete - horrible...

01:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Who. ----ing. Cares. WP:NOTFB. WP:NOTGOSSIP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Obviously fails...

media that would make it true. This just strikes to me like a bit of WP:NOTGOSSIP hearsay released on a slow news day. Funny Pika! 07:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)...

gossip blogs. Just a reminder, Wikipedia isn't a gossip blog/newspaper WP:NOTGOSSIP. Refs: Only The Citizen is a reliable source, the rest are blogs that...

NineMSN. Some are just straight-up gossip. While I'm conscious of WP:NOTGOSSIP, this is "entertainment news" type gossip which has come from various...

(talk) 02:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC) This whole article is a bloated WP:NOTGOSSIP/WP:ROUTINE hitpiece. At best, this needs selectively merging into the...

show. The whole interaction between Candace and Cardi B sounds like WP:NOTGOSSIP. I also think WP:ROUTINE is relevant considering the few sources that...

soibangla (talk) 21:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTGOSSIP. Just because something is in the news does not mean it becomes a Wikipedia...

party membership, him losing his title) that are different from what WP:NOTGOSSIP refers to, which are articles that focus on celebrity relationship scandals...

people for the neurodiversity cause, and both are speculative... see WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Jytdog (talk) 04:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC) I've been following...

article on something so delicate that comes off as WP:FORUM or even WP:NOTGOSSIP? HĐ (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC) An indiscriminate collection...

Translate). This tabloid content is not suitable for inclusion per WP:NOTGOSSIP. In the section described as a discussion of her television work, the...

(talk) 23:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails Notability and WP:NOTGOSSIP The majority of this article is about their obsession with looking Korean...

show. The whole interaction between Candace and Cardi B sounds like WP:NOTGOSSIP. I also think WP:ROUTINE is relevant considering the few sources that...

scope. As the first AfD discussion suggested, neither WP:NOTNEWS nor WP:NOTGOSSIP necessarily preclude this article's existence, given that the topic, even...

articles beginning "Coming out of" even if they do meet WP:GNG per WP:NOTGOSSIP.--Launchballer 10:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEVENT, WP:SUSTAINED...

additional in this article that could justifiably be merged there (per WP:NOTGOSSIP). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosbif73 (talk • contribs) 11:54...

evidence Bosworth actually believes/said that. Clear violation of WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NEWSORG ("Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should include information...

This is a coatrack, it could be scandal mongering a la WP:SOAP a.k.a. WP:NOTGOSSIP with the current title. The topic of the content, IMHO, doesn't even rise...

notability. We need better quality sources than these. WP:NOTNEWS/ WP:NOTGOSSIP applies.4meter4 (talk) 04:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC) NOTNEWS focuses on events...

think this comes under WP:NOT, in particular WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA and WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTDIRECTORY then I despair. Draftifying is pointless; it won't...

money, or that others spout in reaction, and WP is not a crystal ball, WP:NOTGOSSIP nor, per WP:SOAPBOX, is it a vehicle for Nutt's promotion of his venture...

responses. Therefore, the article's relevance persists. The argument of WP:NOTGOSSIP does not hold up. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, and that is...

high quality sources), per WP:REDFLAG, per Wikipedia's WP:BLP and WP:NOTGOSSIP policy, avoid directly using these sources and it is advised to use more...

encyclopedic context. Within the same section of the policy, there is also WP:NOTGOSSIP, e.g. Not every facet of a celebrity's life, personal details, matches...

per WP:LISTCRIT (what constitutes "unrealized" is horribly vague), WP:NOTGOSSIP (so-and-so was rumored to be working on such-and-such), and the really...

the press belongs in Wikipedia. WP:NOT has a specific clause about WP:NOTGOSSIP. And as for the number of daily pageviews meaning anything at all in our...

citing WP:NOTGOSSIP. I did the right thing. I brought it up on the talk page with WP:ROC and pointed out that the citation of WP:NOTGOSSIP is incredibly...

the article. —Xezbeth (talk) 17:40, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTGOSSIP Avengers 4 rumors. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)...

guidelines! Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a forum ,WP:PERSONAL, Wikipedia:NOTGOSSIP,Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning, WP:CIVIL --Miraclexix (talk)...

particular field so the only thing we have in our hand is gossip and rumors WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NEWSORG that generates to often a specific point-of-view and thus...

become its own article. -- Banjeboi 00:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Seriously, we're debating this? --Philosopher Let us reason together...

notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. SpinningSpark 11:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC) I agree...

source material." Further, I would also contend that we're getting into WP:NOTGOSSIP territory with many/most of these sources. I would second JoelleJay's...

notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. There is nothing of substance in the news coverage. --Викидим (talk)...

("pointless trivia" and the like) but some are grounded in policies like WP:NOTGOSSIP, potentially (potentially, because they are not unrebutted) valid WP:RS...

non-signicant legal dispute is tabloid fodder and should not be used per WP:NOTGOSSIP and policy at WP:BLPGOSSIP. 4meter4 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Comment...

qualify for inclusion and Wikipedia is not written in news style. WP:NOTGOSSIP: Not every facet of a celebrity's life, personal details, matches played...

not uniquely of interest to swifties, but in my opinion it breaks WP:NOTGOSSIP. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Delete -- (merge...

14:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid, it is WP:NOTGOSSIP, and it is WP:NOTNEWS, e.g. most newsworthy events do not qualify for...

independently notable enough to meet the GNG and NOT tests (particularly NOTGOSSIP). Even if one were to consider that he did meet those conditions, there...

Thanks for providing the diffs, I hope Juzumaru knows about WP:RGW and WP:NOTGOSSIP. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 14:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 126/Hijiri88's...

"there is no definitive proof on this subject, only speculation" and WP:NOTGOSSIP. Naue7 (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC) Even if this is a BLP issue...

Gawker has always been 'gossip blog', hence it comes in conflict with WP:NOTGOSSIP. ― Padenton|✉   04:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Sure, Gawker is still in some...

girlfriend despite the fact that one of the policies of Wikipedia is WP:NOTGOSSIP? Are you shitting me kidding? Trillfendi (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)...

and the merge. PackMecEng (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTGOSSIP, fails WP:N and may even be WP:POVFORK - pick one. It's gossip based on...

@IgnatiusofLondon) I don't really see a need to try to amend NOTGOSSIP again. NOTGOSSIP is basically an anti-trivia policy on celebs and athletes to keep...

significance." Ravenswing 01:28, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Delete and redirect per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Wikipedia is not a gossip column. cookiemonster755 (talk) 13:29, 4 August...

our policies and guidelines. The application of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:NOTGOSSIP may also help trim content, and WP:NOTNEWS and its relationship to WP:BLP1E...

existed and plus this is not the place for trivia and gossip (see WP:NOTGOSSIP), like really, why would we care whether the father attended the subject's...

two celebrities. Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTSCANDAL Hkfilmbuff (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Keep, WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTSCANDAL are not the excuses...

significant RS coverage. (t · c) buidhe 08:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC) WP:NOTGOSSIP ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Do not retarget...

possibly WP:FRINGE. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTGOSSIP --Cybercobra (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC) I bluelinked the missing...

is WP:NOTGOSSIP (read it!) and also somewhat WP:NOTNEWS. These efforts to extend the storms into WP don't fit perfectly into either but NOTGOSSIP is closest...

guidelines! Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a forum ,WP:PERSONAL, Wikipedia:NOTGOSSIP,Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning, WP:CIVIL --Miraclexix (talk)...

soibangla (talk) 21:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTGOSSIP. Just because something is in the news does not mean it becomes a Wikipedia...

Translate). This tabloid content is not suitable for inclusion per WP:NOTGOSSIP. In the section described as a discussion of her television work, the...

WP:NEWSORGS but are instead just blogs, especially odialive.com, and 3) the WP:NOTGOSSIP nature of the pieces. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)...

any kind of articles named "Rumors about..." become questionable per WP:NOTGOSSIP. The Sesame Street article is 50kB size ,and this rumors content fork...

August 2019 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:BLP, WP:BLPCRIME, WP:TOOSOON, and WP:NOTGOSSIP. This case might in the future have a lasting impact, and Yaniv herself...

money, or that others spout in reaction, and WP is not a crystal ball, WP:NOTGOSSIP nor, per WP:SOAPBOX, is it a vehicle for Nutt's promotion of his venture...

European elections, in which immigration is an hot topic), for sure it is WP:NOTGOSSIP. P1221 (talk) 08:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Keep - This is an important event...

media that would make it true. This just strikes to me like a bit of WP:NOTGOSSIP hearsay released on a slow news day. Funny Pika! 07:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)...

independently notable enough to meet the GNG and NOT tests (particularly NOTGOSSIP). Even if one were to consider that he did meet those conditions, there...

particular field so the only thing we have in our hand is gossip and rumors WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NEWSORG that generates to often a specific point-of-view and thus...

Delete per nom. Me5000 (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Rapper disputes are as interesting as any other neighbourhood disputes...

show. The whole interaction between Candace and Cardi B sounds like WP:NOTGOSSIP. I also think WP:ROUTINE is relevant considering the few sources that...

mostly referring to are WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:SOAP and WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTGOSSIP. Your claims of indiscriminateness are in my opinion flawed. Reading the...

our policies and guidelines. The application of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:NOTGOSSIP may also help trim content, and WP:NOTNEWS and its relationship to WP:BLP1E...

per WP:LISTCRIT (what constitutes "unrealized" is horribly vague), WP:NOTGOSSIP (so-and-so was rumored to be working on such-and-such), and the really...

provoke public interest and excitement at the expense of accuracy. WP:NOTGOSSIP applies. In no way does the yourobserver.com story or its attached interview...

redirect could be an option too. Other events listed in the page fail WP:NOTGOSSIP. Underpaid Intern (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

per WP:What Wikipedia is not, specifically its sections WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Having an article for something as routine and...

become its own article. -- Banjeboi 00:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Seriously, we're debating this? --Philosopher Let us reason together...

("pointless trivia" and the like) but some are grounded in policies like WP:NOTGOSSIP, potentially (potentially, because they are not unrebutted) valid WP:RS...

non-signicant legal dispute is tabloid fodder and should not be used per WP:NOTGOSSIP and policy at WP:BLPGOSSIP. 4meter4 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Comment...

fortunately, Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is also not a gossip column (wp:notgossip) or in the business of scandal mongering (wp:notscandal) to garner an...

encyclopedic context. Within the same section of the policy, there is also WP:NOTGOSSIP, e.g. Not every facet of a celebrity's life, personal details, matches...

the press belongs in Wikipedia. WP:NOT has a specific clause about WP:NOTGOSSIP. And as for the number of daily pageviews meaning anything at all in our...

any kind of articles named "Rumors about..." become questionable per WP:NOTGOSSIP. The Sesame Street article is 50kB size ,and this rumors content fork...

2012 argue that the material is not encyclopedic (WP:NOTDIARY and WP:NOTGOSSIP) and WP:UNDUE. The material was recently rewritten to resolve WP:V and...

think this comes under WP:NOT, in particular WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA and WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTDIRECTORY then I despair. Draftifying is pointless; it won't...

(talk) 23:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails Notability and WP:NOTGOSSIP The majority of this article is about their obsession with looking Korean...

telling that this is the only "Rumors about <whatever>"[14] page WP has. WP:NOTGOSSIP (1&3). Anything usefull can be merged to Misinformation and rumors about...

JSTOR · TWL) Although the subject is deceased, I think this falls under WP:NOTGOSSIP. This article appears to be a collection of rumors written in an unencyclopedic...

and speculation. Editors should be cautious, since WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP tell us to avoid gossip. Many of the articles are summaries of other sources...

article on something so delicate that comes off as WP:FORUM or even WP:NOTGOSSIP? HĐ (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC) An indiscriminate collection...

evidence Bosworth actually believes/said that. Clear violation of WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NEWSORG ("Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should include information...

notability. We need better quality sources than these. WP:NOTNEWS/ WP:NOTGOSSIP applies.4meter4 (talk) 04:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC) NOTNEWS focuses on events...

people for the neurodiversity cause, and both are speculative... see WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Jytdog (talk) 04:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC) I've been following...

are not a newspaper, and not part of the blogosphere. = WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP. The actual significance of this event will not be known for a long time...

August 2019 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:BLP, WP:BLPCRIME, WP:TOOSOON, and WP:NOTGOSSIP. This case might in the future have a lasting impact, and Yaniv herself...

fortunately, Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is also not a gossip column (wp:notgossip) or in the business of scandal mongering (wp:notscandal) to garner an...

girlfriend despite the fact that one of the policies of Wikipedia is WP:NOTGOSSIP? Are you shitting me kidding? Trillfendi (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)...

then it's not under GOSSIP. The only thing in there that applies is NOTGOSSIP: "Not every facet of a celebrity's life, personal details, matches played...

NineMSN. Some are just straight-up gossip. While I'm conscious of WP:NOTGOSSIP, this is "entertainment news" type gossip which has come from various...

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Delete, including per WP:NOTGOSSIP/WP:NOTDIARY, which encourages us to exclude coverage of gossip and trivia...

provoke public interest and excitement at the expense of accuracy. WP:NOTGOSSIP applies. In no way does the yourobserver.com story or its attached interview...

gossip that Luder got into a dispute with his neighbors about some cat. WP:NOTGOSSIP. Jytdog (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Agreed. But that's why this...

itself with facts Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NOTGOSSIP. None of these claims are supported by reliable sources. Funny Pika! 17:19...

gg and Tubefilter), Nickiswift which is a tabloid gossip website (WP:NOTGOSSIP), and AZcentral which is likely the only reliable source of the lot. Add...

whole article is mostly speculations and gossip. Obviously, Wiki is WP:NOTGOSSIP and not WP:FUTURE. Grahaml35 (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC) Comment...

on the relevant policies and guidelines being applied. WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP aka WP:SOAPBOX, WP:UNDUE,etc. Editorial judgement matters, as always....

are not a newspaper, and not part of the blogosphere. = WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP. The actual significance of this event will not be known for a long time...

publishes celebrity gossip, which is discouraged in WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP. For what it's worth, this magazine tends to publish more positive (and...

This is a coatrack, it could be scandal mongering a la WP:SOAP a.k.a. WP:NOTGOSSIP with the current title. The topic of the content, IMHO, doesn't even rise...

gossip site". It should generally be avoided per WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP. We've previously blacklisted gossip blogs (such as Just Jared, mentioned...

per WP:What Wikipedia is not, specifically its sections WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Having an article for something as routine and...

several other WP policies and guidelines as well, including WP:NOT (WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:INDISCRIMINATE), WP:NPOV/WP:UNDUE, WP:SYNTH. Much of the content and...

mostly referring to are WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:SOAP and WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTGOSSIP. Your claims of indiscriminateness are in my opinion flawed. Reading the...

gossip about [(bernie vs hilary) vs trump], and we are an encyclopedia, NOTGOSSIP/NOTTABLOID and NOTNEWS On yet another level of analysis, someone would...

"CELEBRITY GOSSIPY BIO", and should be avoided per WP:BLPGOSSIP and WP:NOTGOSSIP. — Newslinger talk 19:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC) No As per the arguments...

it. Dependent on whether you consider that the content may violate WP:NOTGOSSIP or similar concerns (therefore preferably shouldn't be immediately visible...

WP:NOTWHOSWHO offers some guidance on this (related to BLP1E), as does NOTGOSSIP, which licenses selective exclusion of facts. We don't need to detail...

can't do it because they do not exist. I know Wiki is WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:RUMOUR, and WP:NOTCATALOG. I am not implying or stating that is. None...

watch | logs | views) The section "Personal life" seems to violate WP:NOTGOSSIP and some BLP issues. I'm inclined to remove it entirely, but I'd like...

April 2013 (UTC) I respectfully point out that WP:BLPGOSSIP (and also WP:NOTGOSSIP) is intended to stop people from inserting unverifiable and irrelevant...

They even vandalize the notes! If I have to edit war with people over WP:NOTGOSSIP I’m doing it for the betterment of the article, not to disrupt or own...

every facet of his life needs to be included even if verified per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC) Yet more junk celebrity...

the justification for this under BLP? I have other issues with this per NOTGOSSIP, but I was reading the version above (which I did not write - see below)...

which editors raised WP:BLP concerns under WP:WEIGHT, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP etc. about mentioning an arrest. Right now, the content has been deleted...

even if reliably sourced. With a nod to WP:BLP, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:1E, WP:NOTGOSSIP etc. Jonathanwallace (talk) 12:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC) Yes, I agree...

This section probably doesn't violate either WP:BLP, exactly, or WP:NOTGOSSIP, exactly, but it sure does skirt close to it. Beyond that, it just sucks...

with fashion with fire works and the whole nine yards... but Really? WP:NOTGOSSIP. The Resident Anthropologist (Talk / contribs) 01:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)...

popularity vs notability nicely. Just what makes Barron notable? Gossip? WP:NOTGOSSIP. His possible future? WP:NOTCRYSTAL. I'll add that WP:BLP needs to followed...

to pushing her against a wall, and they divorced.". But again, WP is NOTGOSSIP. Bottom line, the proposed content is gutter crawling trash. 08:07, 8...

(talk) 23:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC) - fixed 'not a tabloid' link, although WP:NOTGOSSIP also applies. Beccaynr (talk) 02:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Update: I removed...

responses. Therefore, the article's relevance persists. The argument of WP:NOTGOSSIP does not hold up. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, and that is...

like End of the British monarchy. But for now, we've moved beyond WP:NOTGOSSIP into a major issue of public debate here in the UK and it feels foolish...

Wikipedia policies all detailed at WP:NOT (namely WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and especially WP:RUMOUR, since none of the parties involved have confirmed...

to be) better sources. I'm also not convinced that it rises above WP:NOTGOSSIP/WP:NOTNEWS. And multiple editors feel the same way. (I mean, Masem and...

01:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Who. ----ing. Cares. WP:NOTFB. WP:NOTGOSSIP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Obviously fails...

though. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:NOTGOSSIP. We are in tabloid territory when we are writing about fashion trends...

gg and Tubefilter), Nickiswift which is a tabloid gossip website (WP:NOTGOSSIP), and AZcentral which is likely the only reliable source of the lot. Add...

journalism that not only is not reliable for a BLP, but also runs afoul of WP:NOTGOSSIP. Banks Irk (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Apart from individual concerns...

generally deals with my concerns. I'm still not quite sure about how NOTGOSSIP plays in here (if you say it in a song, and a secondary source covers...

article. Cortador (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTGOSSIP Kcmastrpc (talk) 11:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Those aren't applicable here...

article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC) As we know WP:NOTGOSSIP goes out the window when ... there's some juicy gossip. Also, basic standards...

albums under a label, etc. There is a "controversy" which is basically WP:NOTGOSSIP. CNMall41 (talk) 20:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

source material." Further, I would also contend that we're getting into WP:NOTGOSSIP territory with many/most of these sources. I would second JoelleJay's...

notability. The only part that discusses notability is point 4, i.e. WP:NOTGOSSIP / WP:NOTDIARY, which recommends against adding trivia. I'd argue, however...

WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NPOV; that fail other aspects of NOT, like WP:NOTWHOSWHO, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTCRYSTAL, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTSOCIAL, WP:NOTCV, WP:NOTMEMORIAL...

not uniquely of interest to swifties, but in my opinion it breaks WP:NOTGOSSIP. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Delete -- (merge...

14:30, 13 March 2023 (UTC) Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid, it is WP:NOTGOSSIP, and it is WP:NOTNEWS, e.g. most newsworthy events do not qualify for...

topics (not me) should judge what to remove per WP:EXCESSDETAIL and WP:NOTGOSSIP; and in a few places Vietnamese terms or names need to be accompanied...

qualify for inclusion and Wikipedia is not written in news style. WP:NOTGOSSIP: Not every facet of a celebrity's life, personal details, matches played...

additional in this article that could justifiably be merged there (per WP:NOTGOSSIP). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosbif73 (talk • contribs) 11:54...

per WP:LISTCRIT (what constitutes "unrealized" is horribly vague), WP:NOTGOSSIP (so-and-so was rumored to be working on such-and-such), and the really...

from smaller entertainment websites is generally trivial. See also WP:NOTGOSSIP. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC) Delete - horrible...

several other WP policies and guidelines as well, including WP:NOT (WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:INDISCRIMINATE), WP:NPOV/WP:UNDUE, WP:SYNTH. Much of the content and...

corroborate. Definitely not an ideal source and probably runs afoul of WP:NOTGOSSIP, especially if not picked up by better sources citing him at all. -- Patar...

Fleshbot article, which was removed and not archived elsewhere. Going by WP:NOTGOSSIP, I feel like this is something readers to her article would have a reasonable...

with encyclopedic relevance. Pehaps you where thinking of WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTGOSSIP. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 18:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC) You’re treating multiple incidents...

significance." Ravenswing 01:28, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Delete and redirect per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Wikipedia is not a gossip column. cookiemonster755 (talk) 13:29, 4 August...

and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. Lacks high-quality coverage, WP:1E is also relevant. Kelob2678 (talk)...

list what amounts to a bunch of unsubstantiated celebrity gossip. WP:NOTGOSSIP is relevant. I think the closure focused too much on the number of !votes...

sources seem to be framing it as a rumour ([34][35]), which fails WP:NOTGOSSIP in addition to BLP sourcing concerns. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions...

notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP. There is nothing of substance in the news coverage. --Викидим (talk)...

existed and plus this is not the place for trivia and gossip (see WP:NOTGOSSIP), like really, why would we care whether the father attended the subject's...

relying upon what I think is a misinterpretation of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTGOSSIP in order to selectively exclude unflattering information about the subject—including...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:N and violates WP:PROMO/WP:NPOV, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and WP:OR. scope_creepTalk 23:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP:NOTWHOSWHO offers some guidance on this (related to BLP1E), as does NOTGOSSIP, which licenses selective exclusion of facts. We don't need to detail...

articles beginning "Coming out of" even if they do meet WP:GNG per WP:NOTGOSSIP.--Launchballer 10:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NEVENT, WP:SUSTAINED...

with encyclopedic relevance. Pehaps you where thinking of WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTGOSSIP. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 18:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC) You’re treating multiple incidents...

like End of the British monarchy. But for now, we've moved beyond WP:NOTGOSSIP into a major issue of public debate here in the UK and it feels foolish...

whole article is mostly speculations and gossip. Obviously, Wiki is WP:NOTGOSSIP and not WP:FUTURE. Grahaml35 (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC) Comment...

popularity vs notability nicely. Just what makes Barron notable? Gossip? WP:NOTGOSSIP. His possible future? WP:NOTCRYSTAL. I'll add that WP:BLP needs to followed...

European elections, in which immigration is an hot topic), for sure it is WP:NOTGOSSIP. P1221 (talk) 08:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Keep - This is an important event...

(talk) 02:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC) This whole article is a bloated WP:NOTGOSSIP/WP:ROUTINE hitpiece. At best, this needs selectively merging into the...

per WP:LISTCRIT (what constitutes "unrealized" is horribly vague), WP:NOTGOSSIP (so-and-so was rumored to be working on such-and-such), and the really...

can't do it because they do not exist. I know Wiki is WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:RUMOUR, and WP:NOTCATALOG. I am not implying or stating that is. None...

party membership, him losing his title) that are different from what WP:NOTGOSSIP refers to, which are articles that focus on celebrity relationship scandals...

just a rumour with nothing to back it. Possibly also creeping into WP:NOTGOSSIP violation. Couple sources worth a mention at parent article. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping>...

notability. The only part that discusses notability is point 4, i.e. WP:NOTGOSSIP / WP:NOTDIARY, which recommends against adding trivia. I'd argue, however...

list what amounts to a bunch of unsubstantiated celebrity gossip. WP:NOTGOSSIP is relevant. I think the closure focused too much on the number of !votes...

another type of work such as a newspaper (WP:NOTNEWS), gossip column (WP:NOTGOSSIP) or statsbook (WP:NOTSTATS). For example, "Not every facet of a celebrity's...

the best course of action would be to point them in the direction of WP:NOTGOSSIP, and tell them that Wikipedia doesn't care either way, since it doesn't...

community consensus has shaped its application. Yes, WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTGOSSIP, and the rest of WP:BLP all matter — and I’ve cited or echoed each of...

Basically violations of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:NOTDB, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTNEWS. Despite reverts with proper explanations...

"coat", per COATRACK). Similarly, it fails WP:NOTNEWS, specifically 1) WP:NOTGOSSIP, because Dalla and Nijjar's connection was also only alleged. ― "Ghost...