ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

non-notable bio Legacypac (talk) 05:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSOCIAL. VQuakr (talk) 05:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

cannot see how this plays any part in creating Wikipedia. It looks like WP:NOTSOCIAL to me - and it has just been cited as WP:OTHERSTUFF on WP:Teahouse/Questions#Navigation...

similar text, are the user's only contributions. The text seems to be WP:NOTSOCIAL material. jp×g 06:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom. --Asmodea...

Yes. Yes, we do. Reyk YO! 08:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSOCIAL. VQuakr (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Delete- no possible chance...

| watch | logs) This page should be deleted, as it conflicts with WP:NOTSOCIAL. E Super Maker (😲 shout) 20:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC) Weak Keep - It...

cunts? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:49, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTSOCIAL Wikipedia is not a social club. We should not be adding non-collaboratory...

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:AUTOBIO, WP:NOTSOCIAL, WP:NOTHERE. Gwen Hope (talk) (contrib) 05:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)...

player? Really? --Church Talk 23:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTSOCIAL. VQuakr (talk) 23:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Spicy (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG. Also, WP:NOTSOCIAL. KidAd (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This debate has been added...

(UTC) Comment, potential grounds for deletion are WP:USERCATYES and WP:NOTSOCIAL (3rd bullet point). Before making up my mind I would like to hear from...

is allowed, an unofficial Steam page should also be. You linked to WP:NOTSOCIAL to justify this, but indeed the Discord page is quite for social purposes...

imagine was a Malvolio reverting it with an edit summary like "see WP:NOTSOCIAL". Shortcut WP:VALIDFPWP:VALIDFP Although Wikipedia editors should be allowed...

page or in a deletion review). The result of the discussion was keep. WP:NOTSOCIAL does not concern formatting but rather the aim of Wikipedia and there...

doesn't need bloggy RSS (or "Share on Facebook", etc.) buttons anyway; WP:NOTSOCIAL.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  04:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC) The above...

to engage on their Talk, yet seeks maximal attn. EOLE79 seemed more WP:NOTSOCIAL oriented; the European IP(s) are the down-low version. EOLE79: Master...

2020 (UTC) Mohit Raj 2, I'm afraid Wikipedia is not social media. WP:NOTSOCIAL Fiddle Faddle 16:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC) Kinman1996 (talk · contribs)...

07:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC) There's no such feature. @Sudeb Halder: see WP:NOTSOCIAL.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC) @Sudeb Halder: You can't...

watch | logs) 103.25.248.239 (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTSOCIAL. From the draft it appears like english isn't your fist language, perhaps...

supported (as you noted) by core policies WP:NPOV, WP:NOTSOAPBOX, WP:NOTSOCIAL etc, there are huge numbers of editors who have vested large chunks of...

history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:UCAT and WP:NOTSOCIAL. Previous categories of Wikpedians by sporting activity have been deleted:...

are all WP:ILIKEIT, and contravene both the guideline and the policy WP:NOTSOCIAL. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Bullshit...

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cory Burkus. Keeping in mind WP:NOTSOCIAL & WP:NOTWEBHOST this content belongs to a large group of 15+ drafts about...

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK/WP:NOTSOCIAL Wikipedia is not a social club. -- 70.24.246.233 (talk) 06:50, 26 January...

the sensibilities of editors who appear not to have read the policy WP:NOTSOCIAL? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC) "Your...

since it makes no sense for any other kind of categorization), then WP:NOTSOCIAL Wikipedia is not a social network, so stop using it as one -- 65.92.246...

January 2020 (UTC) Delete. I really don't understand how we got from WP:NOTSOCIAL to this tsunami of userboxes for everything under the sun. --Gonnym (talk)...

notable? Theroadislong (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC) @Emon Chuwdhury:, WP:NOTSOCIAL if you are trying to find work or make friends take it to a social media...

your contribs to this site is building a social network (contrary to WP:NOTSOCIAL) ... but your decision to spend your energies getting outraged about the...

genuinely notable according to Wikipedia's policies. Please consider WP:NOTSOCIAL, Wikipedia is not a social networking site, you might prefer something...

transclusions · logs · subpages) While I doubt this meets the intent of WP:NOTSOCIAL, this template has regardless not caught on with only some 3 uses. Izno...

having any interest in editing in it that field, which contravenes WP:NOTSOCIAL. This is exactly the same set of issues raised at WP:CFD 2018 December...

vaghani (talk) 09:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Aniket vaghani, Please read WP:NOTSOCIAL which is why your submission has been rejected Fiddle Faddle 09:30, 8...

make money to promote something. For an article (not yust "page", WP:NOTSOCIAL) to be created sucessfully, it would require multiple reliable independent...

local issue, that seems to break WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTSOCIAL and WP:DISCLAIMERS -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)...

anything treating Wikipedia as a video game should be removed, similar to WP:NOTSOCIAL. And WP:NOTANARCHY for that matter. See also the youtube link showing...

world about themselves, please review the autobiography policy and WP:NOTSOCIAL. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC) IqbalBarbhuiya10 (talk · contribs)...

(UTC) @Britishfinance: absolutely true. AUU's remark made me think of WP:NOTSOCIAL, you see, and it didn't seem to fit. ——SN54129 18:36, 4 November 2019...

JOKE-applicable, since it is not empty, as it is being used to categorize users. WP:NOTSOCIAL Wikipedia is not a social site, we should not be categorizing users by...

viewed as a sort of social media by many people, our protestations of NOTSOCIAL notwithstanding. After that preamble, here's my response. Criticism of...

add a persistent value to our common project. BTW, please also see WP:NOTSOCIAL – Wikipedia is not a social media, we don't host any profiles for people...

September 2012 (UTC) You cannot "generalise" this template into a generic WP:NOTSOCIAL warning as that isn't what it's for in the first place. So this whole...

leaving warnings on his Talk page. Nenoniel has also left inappropriate WP:NOTSOCIAL comments on my personal Talk page. Muzilon (talk) 00:37, 29 June 2019...

unblocks are cheap and so are reblocks). I propose a reminder to follow NOTSOCIAL and perhaps some restriction from unnecessary user talkpage edits (i.e...

complains". Liken the lack of a bulleted list of negative actions to WP:NOTSOCIAL. Carl Fredrik talk 20:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC) CFCF I hope you did not...

late at this point to continue, and that you should probably keep WP:NOTSOCIAL a little more in mind. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)...

page wasn't the right approach to the legitimate question of whether WP:NOTSOCIAL should restrict the existence of meetup organization pages on enwiki....

07:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Comment - Wikipedia is not a social network (WP:NOTSOCIAL) and along with that goes all trappings of social networks, including...

30 October 2021 (UTC) Strong Delete – not what userspace is meant for (NOTSOCIAL/NOTWEBHOST/NOTESSAY), especially when it involves real users and sockpuppets...

they should be struck out or ignored. There is NO rule that I see at WP:NOTSOCIAL that would forbid a share button. There are some privacy concerns above...

categories should not be used as "bottom-of-the-page" notices or the policy WP:NOTSOCIAL. And you want the programming resources of he community and/or WMF to...

2017 (UTC) Wikipedia is most definitely not a social media site. See WP:NOTSOCIAL. While you can link your account with an email address (and I see that...

every single thing, that potentially has a social aspect to it, with a NOTSOCIAL link is even more so a fallacy. The world is not that simple. We are not...

a social club would apply to collecting points/barnstars/whatever. WP:NOTSOCIAL would seem to illustrate what Wikipedia is for (the creation of knowledge...

on earth would you want to use such silly things on Wikipedia? See WP:NOTSOCIAL. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC) Emojis are a...

98 (talk) 03:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Sorry, but oppose for now per WP:NOTSOCIAL. Remove the "article notes" and "reviews" (first screenshot), since we're...

I think you have mistaken Wikipedia for a social media platform, which it is not (see WP:NOTSOCIAL). —[AlanM1(talk)]— 01:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)...

just my opinion. Ignatzmice•talk 17:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC) (Keeping WP:NOTSOCIAL in mind) some editors add others in Facebook or Google Plus. I have got...

Oppose as being overly consuming of server resources, WP:NOTAFORUM, and WP:NOTSOCIAL. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) I think that this proposal...

discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. See WP:NOTSOCIAL 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:34, 5 November...

media" site, where people put up pages about themselves. Please see WP:NOTSOCIAL. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 19:08, 10 September 2019 (UTC) How to delete a page ...

(UTC) Christine: In case it wasn't clear, please click on these links: WP:NOTSOCIAL, WP:NOTPROMO, and WP:OUT. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 18:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)...

you want to read about what the users above are saying, here it is: WP:NOTSOCIAL. Thanks. William2001(talk) 04:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC) Dear all, How can...

social media site, or promotion platform. Please see WP:NOTFORUM, WP:NOTSOCIAL, WP:PROMO, etc.. Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 22:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)...

straight to MFD and it would be subsequently deleted. Probably because of WP:NOTSOCIAL (our objective is to write pages and the groups we form here [at least]...

contribs) 15:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC) Hello Prazkhanal, see WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTSOCIAL. You need to meet the criteria laid out at WP:Notability (people) before...

or even just socializing. (There is actually an anti-social policy! WP:NOTSOCIAL) That is why, I believe that the IRC channel #wikipedia-en connect is...

what reliable sources have written about various subjects. Please see WP:NOTSOCIAL and the other sections of that page. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 17:22, 5 July 2020...

above users are saying regarding your userpage, please take a look at WP:NOTSOCIAL. Thanks. William2001(talk) 22:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC) Could you please add...

and discover each other. LDW5432 (talk) 19:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTSOCIAL much? * Pppery * it has begun... 19:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose....

entertainment instead of dispute resolution. This is a long-standing NOTSOCIAL / NOTGAME / NOTFORUM / NOTBATTLEGROUND issue that the community doesn't...

arguments made in past attempts, and current rationale doesn't hold water. WP:Notsocial isn't meant to prevent people from expressing approval or disapproval...

Spicy (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG. Also, WP:NOTSOCIAL. KidAd (talk) 17:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This debate has been added...

contribs) 21:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC) This falls squarely into WP:NOTSOCIAL territory if not also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. --Izno (talk) 22:17, 23 September...

been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:NOUSERSWP:NOUSERS WP:NOCOMMUNITYWP:NOCOMMUNITY WP:NOTACOMMUNITYWP:NOTACOMMUNITY WP:NOTSOCIALWP:NOTSOCIAL...

would be because the page merely provided information. Wikipedia is [{WP:NOTSOCIAL|not social media]] to just post biographies; this is an encyclopedia....

mention, there's also the WP:VILLAGEPUMP! But you might want to see also WP:NOTSOCIAL and its brother WP:NOTFORUM. General chit-chat is not a goal of Wikipedia...

Groovy (talk • contribs) I presume Gandalf the Groovy meant to link to WP:NOTSOCIAL, a subesction of WP:NOT. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)...

Facebook, Twitter, and the endless social media, a social community (WP:NOTSOCIAL) or venue for personal interests or identity. Therefore, the fourth pillar...

and the networking arguments run counter to long-standing policy at WP:NOTSOCIAL. So I attach little wight to those arguments, and as a result I find a...

discussing matters directly related to Wikipedia, and nothing else. See WP:NOTSOCIAL for further explanation of this. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:42, 17 September...

September 2021 (UTC) @Mlik point Just stick to the former, please. See WP:NOTSOCIAL. The Nick Moyes (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC) @Mlik point: If you're...

editors, and autism is a clearly-recognised community. But in the end WP:NOTSOCIAL applies; there isn't a clear reason I can think of for people specifically...

like WP:NOTWHOSWHO, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTCRYSTAL, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTSOCIAL, WP:NOTCV, WP:NOTMEMORIAL, WP:NOTADVICE, and so on; that are self-sourced...

However I have no idea how to do this in a way that doesn't violate WP:NOTSOCIAL or otherwise proves unhelpful (I most certainly do not want Wikipedia...

appreciation messages on talk pages and focus more on building articles. See WP:NOTSOCIAL. Ahri Boy (talk) 04:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC) It’s not on talk pages, it’s...

to each other or chatting about general stuff. Please read Wikipedia:NOTSOCIAL and Wikipedia:USERTALK if you want to find out more. You've only made...

userspace, templatespace or elsewhere, essentially per WP:NOTADVOCACY, WP:NOTSOCIAL and as being generally not conducive to editing. And I suggest that we...

we're not here for that purpose, nor do we want to encourage it. See WP:NOTSOCIAL. Some people do use off-wiki sites, but I can't comment on any of those...

edits 22:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC) Thanks, so do we! But remember WP:NOTSOCIAL, you can help build articles if you can! Ahri Boy (talk) 07:34, 10 December...

09:55, 3 July 2026 (UTC) Talking casually is fine (as long as you heed WP:NOTSOCIAL). As for your article idea, you need only prove it’s notable in order...

signatures if they wish, but the existence of such doesn't go against WP:NOTSOCIAL. Custom signatures make it easier (in many cases) to identify which user...

that it could forbid statements such as "I like dogs" - arguably a WP:NOTSOCIAL violation, but not something we should really be concerned about editors...

What is your Wikipedia-related reason for wanting this? Please read WP:NOTSOCIAL. ColinFine (talk) 18:28, 9 July 2026 (UTC) IP editor. I have reverted...

15:34, 3 March 2026 (UTC) We might want to stop talking. After all, WP:NOTSOCIAL exists. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 15:35, 3 March...

(talk) 06:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC) Please see WP:EMERGENCY. Remember, WP:NOTSOCIAL. Ahri Boy (talk) 05:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC) I’m sorry, I wasn’t feeling...

individuals such as myself. Anyways, have a nice day! :transheart:, plus WP:NOTSOCIAL communications with other soyjak party users on their talk pages: see...

think you have us confused with Facebook. Please read WP:BOSS and WP:NOTSOCIAL. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) I laughed so hard....