ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

WP:NOTBUREAUWP:NOTBUREAU WP:NOTLAWWP:NOTLAW WP:NOTSTATUTEWP:NOTSTATUTE Wikipedia is not a battleground. ~~~~ Disruptive editing can occur on...

contributors over-avoid leaving any ambiguity by using more words (see WP:NOTSTATUTE/GUIDE). Even capable authors recognize the risk of distortion through...

files NOTSOAPBOX (WP:NOTSOAPBOX) – Wikipedia is not a soapbox NOTSTATUTE (WP:NOTSTATUTE) – Wikipedia is not governed by statute NOTSTUPID (WP:NOTSTUPID)...

This "party" goes against core Wikipedia policies WP:NOTFREESPEECH, WP:NOTSTATUTE, etc. All related pages should also be deleted. 67.119.15.30 (talk) 18:59...

punishment for a set law. Am I the only one who thinks that way, did I miss WP:NOTSTATUTE being removed?Camelbinky (talk) 03:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC) As previously...

handling of the issue by some participants here. The existence of NOTBURO, NOTSTATUTE, IAR, etc. show (IMO) that we're supposed to care more about adhering...

giving a forum for those that agree with things like IAR, consensus, wp:notstatute, and common sense. It is a liberal view of Wikipedia as a place where...

a policy, both policies and guidelines are meaningless because of WP:NOTSTATUTE, a policy; and even if they weren't, they'd be meaningless because of...

reading of statute indicates they also are that. I'm quite happy with WP:NOTSTATUTE and WP:IAR however. There are quite enough nit picking rule followers...

because: a) they make the page look too much like code of statutes, and WP:NOTSTATUTE, of course, and b) If you provide anchors, someone might wiklink to them...

poor understanding of Wikipedia. Here, for your own convenience, from WP:NOTSTATUTE which is a policy: "Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the...

discussions instead of having a bot make the decision. See for example WP:NOTSTATUTE, which says basically says policy documents what comes out of consensus...

pillar, not to be rubberized, and acting as if AfC traditions were WP:NOTSTATUTE. Was this okay? Yes... as long as Kafziel's actions really *were* improving...

discussions instead of having a bot make the decision. See for example WP:NOTSTATUTE, which says basically says policy documents what comes out of consensus...

reverting those seems fine if anything is left of them by now. Anyway, WP:NOTSTATUTE. Situational adaptation is good. 67.119.12.141 (talk) 00:34, 4 February...

because they are part of a legal system, are bound by precedent, etc. Per NOTSTATUTE we are not in a legal system: we have to deal with actual facts on the...

policies" need to get a clue about the nature of Wikipedia policy. See WP:NOTSTATUTE. Editors who bring Wikipedia into disrepute should be banned, however...

things. I say that's spinach, and a violation of common sense and WP:NOTSTATUTE policies. I can't imagine ordinary editors actually agreeing that this...